Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 69 references

A compact fused-silica Torsional-X seismometer is projected to improve lunar gravitational-wave strain sensitivity by nearly an order of magnitude around 0.1 Hz, potentially opening the decihertz band to intermediate-mass black-hole binarie

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 22:34 UTC pith:AUXLXGUW

load-bearing objection A serious instrument-concept paper with a working prototype; the headline sensitivity gain hinges on an assumed loss angle that is currently ~700x optimistic. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.15683 v1 pith:AUXLXGUW submitted 2026-07-17 astro-ph.IM

Torsional-X Seismometer for Lunar Decihertz Gravitational-Wave Detection

Yulin Xia , Denis Martynov , Huan Yang , Haixing Miao This is my paper
classification astro-ph.IM
keywords torsional seismometerlunar gravitational-wave detectiondecihertz bandfused silicatorsional pendulummechanical losselectrostatic actuationsuspension thermal noise
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper proposes the Torsional-X (TX) seismometer, a compact fused-silica pendulum for a lunar gravitational-wave observatory that would cover the decihertz band between ground- and space-based detectors. The design converts horizontal ground motion into a slow torsional oscillation through an off-center mass suspended by two high-tension fibers, enabling a 4.6 mHz resonance with a loss angle near 10^-7. The paper argues that such a device would reach acceleration noise around 10^-15 m/s²/√Hz at 0.1 Hz, improving strain sensitivity of existing lunar seismometer concepts by nearly an order of magnitude. A room-temperature prototype validates the operating principle, though its measured loss (Q ≈ 1.4×10^4) remains above the assumed target.

Core claim

The central claim is that the TX architecture—a torsional pendulum with an offset rotating mass and a dual-fiber, high-tension fused-silica suspension—can realize a millihertz-scale torsional resonance while raising the translational mode to a few hertz. With a fused-silica loss angle of 10^-7, the thermal noise floor at 0.1 Hz falls to roughly 10^-15 m/s²/√Hz, which projects to about a tenfold gain in strain sensitivity around 0.1 Hz compared to earlier lunar seismometer concepts. The paper demonstrates a room-temperature vacuum prototype that confirms the mechanical working principle, reports a quality factor of 1.4×10^4, and attributes the remaining loss gap to clamping at the metal-silic

What carries the argument

The Torsional-X (TX) suspension: a monolithic fused-silica pendulum whose mass center is deliberately offset from the rotation axis so that horizontal acceleration produces a yaw torque (the garden-gate idea). Two symmetrically tilted fibers, pulled to high tension, counteract the static gravitational torque from the offset mass and raise the horizontal pendulum mode to about 4 Hz, while leaving the torsional mode at 4.6 mHz; the high tension also introduces a dissipation dilution factor of about 10^-3 that suppresses horizontal thermal noise.

Load-bearing premise

The projected tenfold sensitivity gain depends on a fully monolithic fused-silica suspension reaching a mechanical loss angle near 10^-7 at room temperature; the prototype loss angle is about 7×10^-5, so if monolithic fabrication cannot close this gap, the advantage shrinks or disappears.

What would settle it

Measure the ringdown time (or thermal-noise floor) of a monolithic fused-silica TX suspension with a torsional resonance near 4.6 mHz at 300 K. If the loss angle is above roughly 3×10^-7 (Q below 3×10^6) or the acceleration noise at 0.1 Hz exceeds the value projected by the paper's Eq. (2) with that loss, the central claim fails.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the projected noise floor is reached, a compact TX payload could serve as the core seismometer of a lunar decihertz gravitational-wave antenna, bringing intermediate-mass black-hole binaries within range.
  • The demonstrated prototype shows that fiber-suspended torsion pendulums can be read out at the required level at room temperature, retiring a key feasibility question for the concept.
  • The subsystem analysis sets concrete budgets—quasi-static leveling below about 0.36 microradians, temperature stability at the 10^-7–10^-2 K/√Hz level, and subdominant electrostatic actuation noise—so that a realistic lunar instrument can be engineered to meet the target.
  • The concept avoids cryogenic operation, since fused-silica's low loss is exploited at room temperature, simplifying thermal design of a lunar station.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial: If the monolithic fused-silica version does not actually reach the assumed loss angle of 10^-7—possible if clamping losses persist or surface losses dominate—the order-of-magnitude improvement collapses; the single most valuable follow-up measurement is a direct ringdown of a monolithic TX at millihertz frequencies.
  • Editorial: The TX geometry might be adapted to terrestrial sub-hertz seismic isolation, e.g., for future ground-based gravitational-wave detector upgrades or for low-frequency seismology, where similar noise floors are sought.
  • Editorial: A three-axis lunar station could combine two horizontal TX units and one vertical unit; cross-coupling and readout interaction among units is a natural testable extension of the prototype.
  • Editorial: The paper's sensitivity curve depends on the lunar response model; if the thick-crust amplification is confirmed, the TX gain could be even larger, but if resonant amplification varies with location, the improvement may be site-dependent.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a compact monolithic fused-silica torsional-X (TX) seismometer for the lunar gravitational-wave antenna (LGWA) concept, targeting the decihertz band (∼0.1–10 Hz). The design uses a high-tension dual-fiber suspension with a center-of-mass offset to convert horizontal acceleration into torsional motion, achieving a designed 4.6 mHz torsional resonance. With an assumed fused-silica loss angle φ=10⁻⁷, the authors project a nearly order-of-magnitude strain sensitivity improvement over existing lunar seismometer concepts around 0.1 Hz (Eq. (2), Fig. 2). They report a room-temperature vacuum prototype with a measured torsional resonance at 0.10 Hz and Q=1.4×10⁴ (φ=7.3×10⁻⁵), which validates the operating principle and basic optomechanical dynamics. The paper then derives requirements for electrostatic actuation, leveling, and temperature stability for a future lunar implementation.

Significance. If the projected sensitivity were realized, the TX architecture would provide a compact, room-temperature seismometer capable of accessing decihertz gravitational-wave sources that are largely unexplored. The work includes a clear derivation of the thermal-noise limit via the fluctuation-dissipation theorem, a prototype ring-down confirming a low-frequency torsional mode with Q=1.4×10⁴, a cross-calibration against a commercial broadband seismometer, and a useful subsystem-requirement analysis. The open data and analysis scripts are a strength. However, the central performance claim is a projection resting on unmeasured quantities—especially the loss angle φ=10⁻⁷ and the millihertz-scale resonance—so the headline sensitivity improvement is not yet demonstrated.

major comments (3)
  1. [Table I and Eq. (2); Proof-of-principle section] The headline sensitivity gain is gated by the assumed effective fused-silica loss angle φ=10⁻⁷. The only loss measurement presented in the paper is the prototype Q=1.4×10⁴, i.e., φ=7.3×10⁻⁵. Since the thermal-noise floor in Eq. (2) scales as √φ in amplitude, this factor-730 gap implies an amplitude penalty of ~27. Even if the order-of-magnitude improvement at 0.1 Hz is taken from Fig. 2(b), replacing the assumed φ with the measured prototype value would shrink the projected improvement to well below an order of magnitude. The paper must either provide direct low-frequency loss measurements approaching 10⁻⁷, or significantly qualify the sensitivity projection.
  2. [Table I and 'From prototype to lunar instrument'] There is an unresolved inconsistency between the chosen tungsten test mass and the proposed route to φ=10⁻⁷ via a 'fully monolithic fused-silica implementation.' The lunar design specifies a tungsten test mass (m=1.2 kg, l_c=10 cm). A fully monolithic fused-silica structure would require either replacing the tungsten with fused silica—which changes m, I, and l_c and thus f_θ and the transduction—or demonstrating a low-loss tungsten–silica joint. Neither is specified. The claim that the loss gap is 'likely dominated by clamping loss at the current metal–silica interfaces' and would be eliminated by a monolithic design therefore lacks a concrete design path for the flight configuration.
  3. [Table I and 'Design concept and science goal'] The target torsional frequency f_θ=4.6 mHz is more than an order of magnitude below the measured prototype frequency of 0.10 Hz, yet no measurement, finite-element analysis, or detailed scaling argument is provided to show that the Table I parameters (fiber length 6.5 cm, radius 50 µm, tilt 2.4°, stress 3 GPa) yield this value. Since the low-frequency thermal-noise suppression in Eq. (2) depends directly on f_θ², and the readout noise in Eq. (3) also depends on f_θ, the millihertz resonance is a load-bearing design assumption that the current prototype does not validate.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract / Introduction] The abstract states a 'nearly order-of-magnitude improvement' without explicitly stating that this is conditional on the assumed φ=10⁻⁷ and f_θ=4.6 mHz. Consider adding a qualifier such as 'projected' or 'design-limited' to avoid overstatement.
  2. [Design concept and science goal] Typo: 'intensionally' should be 'intentionally' in the second paragraph.
  3. [Proof-of-principle] The sentence 'The key question is therefore no longer whether the TX architecture works in principle' is too strong given that the target noise has not been reached. Suggest rewording to reflect that the principle is validated but the performance is not.
  4. [Fig. 2(b) caption / text] The strain sensitivity uses a piecewise fit to the LGWA response. The model dependence is acknowledged, but the fit details are not given. A brief reference to the exact LGWA dataset or a reproducibility note would help.
  5. [Eq. (4) and Table I] The electrode area A_e=4×4 cm² is given for a single electrode; Eq. (4) appears to assume a parallel-plate geometry with two electrodes. It would be clearer to state whether A_e is per electrode and how the differential drive is included.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the sensitivity projection is a parameterized fluctuation-dissipation calculation; the gap between the adopted phi=1e-7 and the prototype loss is an acknowledged assumption and engineering risk, not a circular reuse of the conclusion.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained in the relevant sense. Equation (2) follows from the fluctuation-dissipation theorem with parameters explicitly listed in Table I; phi=1e-7 is an adopted design target ('For the baseline noise budget, we adopt an effective fused-silica loss angle of phi=10^-7, which accounts for both bulk and surface dissipation and is consistent with demonstrated suspensions [44,45]') rather than a quantity fitted to the predicted sensitivity. The claimed order-of-magnitude improvement at 0.1 Hz is a direct arithmetic consequence of the chosen f_theta and phi in Eq. (2), compared against the same lunar-response model used for the BNU and LGWA concepts. The prototype section does not claim to have reached the target: it reports Q=1.4e4 (phi=7.3e-5) and explicitly attributes the remaining gap to 'clamping loss at the current metal-silica interfaces,' with a monolithic implementation 'potentially' reaching the material-loss limit. That gap is an unvalidated assumption and a correctness/engineering risk, not a circular step. The strain comparison is explicitly model-dependent ('we adopt the lunar response model used in the LGWA study'). The few self-citations (e.g., Refs. [39-41,55,56] for torsional-seismometer heritage and laser-position-sensor readout) support auxiliary claims and are not load-bearing for the central sensitivity calculation, which relies on external measurements [44,45]. No equation is equivalent to its inputs, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Therefore the circularity score is 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

Ledger counts the assumptions the sensitivity projection is built on: the material loss and dilution values, the design eigenfrequency, and the assumed temperature, electronics, and leveling performance. The prototype validates the transduction geometry but does not supply these values; they come from prior literature or from stated engineering targets. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • Effective fused-silica loss angle φ = 10^-7 (design baseline; prototype measured 7.3×10^-5)
    Adopted in Table I for the baseline noise budget and not achieved by the prototype. The thermal-noise floor and hence the order-of-magnitude gain scale with √φ, making this the most load-bearing parameter.
  • Horizontal-mode dilution factor η = ~10^-3
    Chosen in Eq. (2) to suppress horizontal thermal noise, attributed to tensile-dominated stiffness with boundary-localized dissipation [51]. Not measured in the prototype.
  • Torsional eigenfrequency f_θ = 4.6 mHz
    Design target from fiber geometry and center-of-mass offset. The prototype operates at 0.10 Hz, so the target-frequency thermal-noise suppression is not demonstrated.
  • Temperature stability spectra S_elec^T and S_core^T = 1.8×10^-2 (1 mHz/f)^1.3 and 1.6×10^-7 (1 mHz/f)^3.6 K/√Hz
    Assumed as a factor-of-10 relaxation of LISA Pathfinder in-flight stability [68]. These levels keep temperature noise subdominant and are not demonstrated in a lunar thermal environment.
  • Electronics voltage noise S_V = ~3.3×10^-9 (1 Hz/f)^1/2 V/√Hz
    Assumed from an effective dynamic range of ~190 dB in force-balance seismometers [37,56,65]. Enters actuation noise through Eq. (4) and sets the leveling requirement.
axioms (5)
  • standard math Fluctuation-dissipation theorem relates mechanical dissipation to thermal acceleration noise
    Used to derive Eq. (2) for torsional and horizontal thermal noise. Standard, but requires the system to be in equilibrium at T=300 K.
  • domain assumption The lunar response converting surface acceleration to GW strain is represented by the LGWA piecewise fit used in [31]
    The absolute strain sensitivity in Fig. 2(b) is model dependent; lateral heterogeneity, topography, and location-dependent resonant amplification can change it [52].
  • domain assumption A monolithic fused-silica suspension can sustain 3 GPa tensile stress with effective loss φ=10^-7 at 300 K
    Cites demonstrated fused-silica suspensions [44,45], but the prototype here reaches only φ=7.3×10^-5 due to clamping. This extrapolation is load-bearing.
  • domain assumption Readout is shot-noise-limited at the same displacement sensitivity as assumed in Refs. [16,30,31]
    Used in Eq. (3). The laboratory LPS readout is tens of pm/√Hz, well above the design readout; compact interferometric readouts are cited as the path to close the gap.
  • domain assumption Electrostatic actuation can provide control authority with the assumed voltage noise and keep actuation noise subdominant
    Requires ~190 dB dynamic range and the quasi-static leveling constraint of 0.36 µrad from Eq. (5). Not demonstrated on the Moon.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 16955 in / 13319 out tokens · 108940 ms · 2026-08-01T22:34:25.398571+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The lunar gravitational-wave antenna concept uses the Moon as a resonant detector instrumented with precision seismometers, targeting the decihertz band between ground- and space-based observatories. We propose a compact monolithic fused-silica torsional-X seismometer that re-engineers garden-gate acceleration-to-rotation transduction for this regime through a high-tension dual-fiber suspension. Its designed millihertz-scale resonance and ultra-low mechanical dissipation enable a nearly order-of-magnitude improvement around $0.1\,\mathrm{Hz}$ compared with existing lunar seismometer concepts. Achieving this performance requires room-temperature operation, where fused-silica exhibits low mechanical loss, together with subdominant actuation noise. We demonstrate a room-temperature vacuum prototype validating the operating principle and core mechanical design, and derive requirements for a future lunar implementation capable of approaching the target sensitivity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.15683 by Denis Martynov, Haixing Miao, Huan Yang, Yulin Xia.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Sensitivity of the TX concept. (a) Acceleration [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Experimental characterization of the TX prototype. (a) Photograph of the prototype, showing the fused-silica fiber [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 8 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Advanced ligo, Classical and Quantum Gravity32, 074001 (2015)

    2015

  2. [2]

    Acernese, M

    F. Acernese, M. Agathos, K. Agatsuma, D. Aisa, N. Alle- mandou, A. Allocca, J. Amarni, P. Astone, G. Balestri, G. Ballardin, F. Barone, J.-P. Baronick, M. Barsug- lia, A. Basti, F. Basti, T. S. Bauer, V. Bavigadda, M. Bejger, M. G. Beker, C. Belczynski, D. Bersanetti, A. Bertolini, M. Bitossi, M. A. Bizouard, S. Bloemen, M. Blom, M. Boer, G. Bogaert, D. B...

    2014

  3. [3]

    Akutsu, M

    T. Akutsu, M. Ando, K. Arai, Y. Arai, S. Araki, A. Araya, N. Aritomi, H. Asada, Y. Aso, S. Atsuta, K. Awai, S. Bae, L. Baiotti, M. A. Barton, K. Cannon, E. Capocasa, C.-S. Chen, T.-W. Chiu, K. Cho, Y.-K. Chu, K. Craig, W. Creus, K. Doi, K. Eda, Y. Enomoto, R. Flaminio, Y. Fujii, M.-K. Fujimoto, M. Fukunaga, M. Fukushima, T. Furuhata, S. Haino, K. Hasegawa...

    2019

  4. [4]

    Barsotti, L

    L. Barsotti, L. McCuller, M. Evans, and P. Fritschel,The A+ Design Curve, Technical Note LIGO-T1800042-v5 (LIGO Laboratory, 2018)

    2018

  5. [5]

    Branchesi, M

    M. Branchesi, M. Maggiore, D. Alonso, C. Badger, B. Banerjee, F. Beirnaert, E. Belgacem, S. Bhagwat, G. Boileau, S. Borhanian, D. D. Brown, M. Leong Chan, G. Cusin, S. L. Danilishin, J. Degallaix, V. De Luca, A. Dhani, T. Dietrich, U. Dupletsa, S. Foffa, G. Franci- olini, A. Freise, G. Gemme, B. Goncharov, A. Ghosh, F. Gulminelli, I. Gupta, P. Kumar Gupta...

    2023

  6. [6]

    Evans, R

    M. Evans, R. X. Adhikari, C. Afle, S. W. Ballmer, S. Bis- coveanu, S. Borhanian, D. A. Brown, Y. Chen, R. Eisen- stein, A. Gruson, A. Gupta, E. D. Hall, R. Huxford, B. Kamai, R. Kashyap, J. S. Kissel, K. Kuns, P. Landry, A. Lenon, G. Lovelace, L. McCuller, K. K. Y. Ng, A. H. Nitz, J. Read, B. S. Sathyaprakash, D. H. Shoemaker, B. J. J. Slagmolen, J. R. Sm...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  7. [7]

    Amaro-Seoane, H

    P. Amaro-Seoane, H. Audley, S. Babak, J. Baker, E. Ba- rausse, P. Bender, E. Berti, P. Binetruy, M. Born, D. Bor- toluzzi, J. Camp, C. Caprini, V. Cardoso, M. Colpi, J. Conklin, N. Cornish, C. Cutler, K. Danzmann, R. Dolesi, L. Ferraioli, V. Ferroni, E. Fitzsimons, J. Gair, L. G. Bote, D. Giardini, F. Gibert, C. Grimani, H. Hal- loin, G. Heinzel, T. Herto...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  8. [8]

    Luo, L.-S

    J. Luo, L.-S. Chen, H.-Z. Duan, Y.-G. Gong, S. Hu, J. Ji, Q. Liu, J. Mei, V. Milyukov, M. Sazhin, C.-G. Shao, V. T. Toth, H.-B. Tu, Y. Wang, Y. Wang, H.-C. Yeh, M.-S. Zhan, Y. Zhang, V. Zharov, and Z.-B. Zhou, Tianqin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector, Classical and Quantum Gravity33, 035010 (2016)

    2016

  9. [9]

    Z. Luo, Y. Wang, Y. Wu, W. Hu, and G. Jin, The taiji program: A concise overview, Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics2021, 05A108 (2021)

    2021

  10. [10]

    Mandel, A

    I. Mandel, A. Sesana, and A. Vecchio, The astrophysical science case for a decihertz gravitational-wave detector, Classical and Quantum Gravity35, 054004 (2018)

    2018

  11. [11]

    J. E. Greene, J. Strader, and L. C. Ho, Intermediate- mass black holes, Annual Review of Astronomy and As- trophysics58, 257 (2020)

    2020

  12. [12]

    H. J. Paik and K. Y. Venkateswara, Gravitational wave detection on the moon and the moons of mars, Advances in Space Research43, 167 (2009)

    2009

  13. [13]

    M. Ando, K. Ishidoshiro, K. Yamamoto, K. Yagi, W. Kokuyama, K. Tsubono, and A. Takamori, Torsion- bar antenna for low-frequency gravitational-wave obser- vations, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 161101 (2010)

    2010

  14. [14]

    Kawamura, M

    S. Kawamura, M. Ando, N. Seto, S. Sato, T. Nakamura, K. Tsubono, N. Kanda, T. Tanaka, J. Yokoyama, I. Fu- naki, K. Numata, K. Ioka, T. Takashima, K. Agatsuma, T. Akutsu, K.-s. Aoyanagi, K. Arai, A. Araya, H. Asada, Y. Aso, D. Chen, T. Chiba, T. Ebisuzaki, Y. Ejiri, M. Enoki, Y. Eriguchi, M.-K. Fujimoto, R. Fujita, M. Fukushima, T. Futamase, T. Harada, T. ...

    2011

  15. [15]

    M. Abe, P. Adamson, M. Borcean, D. Bortoletto, K. Bridges, S. P. Carman, S. Chattopadhyay, J. Cole- man, N. M. Curfman, K. DeRose, T. Deshpande, S. Di- 8 mopoulos, C. J. Foot, J. C. Frisch, B. E. Garber, S. Geer, V. Gibson, J. Glick, P. W. Graham, S. R. Hahn, R. Harnik, L. Hawkins, S. Hindley, J. M. Hogan, Y. Jiang, M. A. Kasevich, R. J. Kellett, M. Kibur...

    2021

  16. [16]

    Harms, F

    J. Harms, F. Ambrosino, L. Angelini, V. Braito, M. Branchesi, E. Brocato, E. Cappellaro, E. Coccia, M. Coughlin, R. D. Ceca, M. D. Valle, C. Dionisio, C. Federico, M. Formisano, A. Frigeri, A. Grado, L. Izzo, A. Marcelli, A. Maselli, M. Olivieri, C. Pernechele, A. Possenti, S. Ronchini, R. Serafinelli, P. Severgnini, M. Agostini, F. Badaracco, A. Bertolin...

    2021

  17. [17]

    S. Chua, N. Holland, P. Forsyth, A. Ramamohan, Y. Zhang, J. Wright, D. Shaddock, D. McClelland, and B. Slagmolen, The torsion pendulum dual oscilla- tor for low-frequency newtonian noise detection, Applied Physics Letters122(2023)

    2023

  18. [18]

    Harms, Seismic background limitation of lunar gravitational-wave detectors, Phys

    J. Harms, Seismic background limitation of lunar gravitational-wave detectors, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 071102 (2022)

    2022

  19. [19]

    Chen, The moon as a gateway to discovery: How lu- nar gravitational-wave detection advances science across disciplines, npj Space Exploration2, 1 (2026)

    X. Chen, The moon as a gateway to discovery: How lu- nar gravitational-wave detection advances science across disciplines, npj Space Exploration2, 1 (2026)

    2026

  20. [20]

    F. J. Dyson, Seismic Response of the Earth to a Gravi- tational Wave in the 1-Hz Band, Astrophys. J.156, 529 (1969)

    1969

  21. [21]

    Bi and J

    X. Bi and J. Harms, Response of the moon to gravita- tional waves, Phys. Rev. D110, 064025 (2024)

    2024

  22. [22]

    H. Yan, X. Chen, J. Zhang, F. Zhang, M. Wang, and L. Shao, Toward a consistent calculation of the lunar re- sponse to gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D109, 064092 (2024)

    2024

  23. [23]

    Zhang, H

    L. Zhang, H. Yan, X. Chen, and J. Zhang, 2d numerical simulation of lunar response to gravitational waves using finite element method, Phys. Rev. D111, 063014 (2025)

    2025

  24. [24]

    Kachelrieß and M

    M. Kachelrieß and M. P. Nødtvedt, Lunar response to gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D110, 064034 (2024)

    2024

  25. [25]

    Majstorovi´ c, L

    J. Majstorovi´ c, L. Vidal, and P. Lognonn´ e, Modeling lu- nar response to gravitational waves using normal-mode approach and tidal forcing, Phys. Rev. D111, 044061 (2025)

    2025

  26. [26]

    J. Li, F. Liu, Y. Pan, Z. Wang, M. Cao, M. Wang, F. Zhang, J. Zhang, and Z.-H. Zhu, Detecting gravita- tional wave with an interferometric seismometer array on lunar nearside, Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy66, 109513 (2023)

    2023

  27. [27]

    J. Li, F. Liu, Y. Pan, Z. Wang, M. Cao, M. Wang, F. Zhang, J. Zhang, and Z.-H. Zhu, Erratum to: De- tecting gravitational wave with an interferometric seis- mometer array on lunar nearside, Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy67, 219551 (2023)

    2023

  28. [28]

    J. V. van Heijningen, H. J. M. ter Brake, O. Gerberd- ing, S. Chalathadka Subrahmanya, J. Harms, X. Bian, A. Gatti, M. Zeoli, A. Bertolini, C. Collette, A. Perali, N. Pinto, M. Sharma, F. Tavernier, and J. Rezvani, The payload of the lunar gravitational-wave antenna, Journal of Applied Physics133, 244501 (2023)

    2023

  29. [29]

    J. V. van Heijningen, A. Bertolini, and J. F. J. van den Brand, A novel interferometrically read out inertial sen- sor for future gravitational wave detectors, in2018 IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS)(2018) pp. 1–5

    2018

  30. [30]

    Branchesi, M

    M. Branchesi, M. Falanga, J. Harms, K. Jani, S. Kat- sanevas, P. Lognonn´ e, F. Badaracco, L. Caccia- puoti, E. Cappellaro, S. Dell’Agnello, S. de Raucourt, A. Frigeri, D. Giardini, O. Jennrich, T. Kawamura, V. Korol, M. Landrø, J. Majstorovi´ c, P. Marmat, P. Mazzali, M. Muccino, F. Patat, E. Pian, T. Piran, S. Rosat, S. Rowan, S. St¨ ahler, J. Tissino,e...

    2023

  31. [31]

    Ajith, P

    P. Ajith, P. A. Seoane, M. A. Sedda, R. Arcodia, F. Badaracco, B. Banerjee, E. Belgacem, G. Benetti, S. Benetti, A. Bobrick, A. Bonforte, E. Bortolas, V. Braito, M. Branchesi, A. Burrows, E. Cappellaro, R. D. Ceca, C. Chakraborty, S. C. Subrahmanya, M. W. Coughlin, S. Covino, A. Derdzinski, A. Doshi, M. Falanga, S. Foffa, A. Franchini, A. Frigeri, Y. Fu- ...

  32. [32]

    L. J. B. LaCoste, A simplification in the conditions for the zero-length-spring seismograph, Bulletin of the Seis- mological Society of America25, 176 (1935)

    1935

  33. [33]

    Harms and C

    J. Harms and C. M. Mow-Lowry, Suspension- thermal noise in spring–antispring systems for future gravitational-wave detectors, Classical and Quantum Gravity35, 025008 (2017)

    2017

  34. [34]

    Pillet, N

    R. Pillet, N. Florsch, J. Hinderer, and D. Rouland, Per- formance of wielandt-streckeisen sts-1 seismometers in the tidal domain—preliminary results, Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors84, 161 (1994)

    1994

  35. [35]

    Wielandt and G

    E. Wielandt and G. Streckeisen, The leaf-spring seis- mometer: Design and performance, Bulletin of the Seis- mological Society of America72, 2349 (1982)

    1982

  36. [36]

    J. A. Anderson and H. O. Wood, A torsion seismometer, J. Opt. Soc. Am.8, 817 (1924)

    1924

  37. [37]

    Wielandt, Seismic sensors and their calibration, inNew Manual of Seismological Observatory Practice (NMSOP-2)(2012)

    E. Wielandt, Seismic sensors and their calibration, inNew Manual of Seismological Observatory Practice (NMSOP-2)(2012). 9

    2012

  38. [38]

    Desalvo, S

    R. Desalvo, S. M´ arka, K. Numata, V. Sannibale, A. Takamori, H. Tariq, E. Ugas, T. Yoda, Y. Aso, and A. Bertolini, Study of quality factor and hysteresis asso- ciated with the state-of-the-art passive seismic isolation system for gravitational wave interferometric detectors, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spe...

    2005

  39. [39]

    Prokhorov, S

    L. Prokhorov, S. Cooper, A. S. Ubhi, C. Mow-Lowry, J. Bryant, A. Dmitriev, C. D. Fronzo, C. J. Collins, A. Gill, A. Mitchell, J. Heinze, J. Smetana, T. Yan, A. V. Cumming, G. Hammond, and D. Martynov, Design and sensitivity of a 6-axis seismometer for gravitational wave observatories (2023), arXiv:2307.12891 [physics.ins-det]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  40. [40]

    A. S. Ubhi, J. Smetana, T. Zhang, S. Cooper, L. Prokhorov, J. Bryant, D. Hoyland, H. Miao, and D. Martynov, A six degree-of-freedom fused silica seis- mometer: design and tests of a metal prototype, Classical and Quantum Gravity39, 015006 (2021)

    2021

  41. [41]

    Smetana, A

    J. Smetana, A. S. Ubhi, E. Chick, L. Prokhorov, J. Bryant, A. Dmitriev, A. Gill, L. Koponen, D. Mar- tynov, H. Miao, A. V. Cumming, G. Hammond, V. Frolov, R. Mittleman, and P. Fritchel, Sensitivity and control of a six-axis fused-silica seismometer, Phys. Rev. Appl.23, 024013 (2025)

    2025

  42. [42]

    Chilton, R

    A. Chilton, R. Shelley, T. Olatunde, G. Ciani, J. W. Conklin, and G. Mueller, The UF torsion pendulum, a lisa technology testbed: Sensing system and initial re- sults, Journal of Physics: Conference Series610, 012038 (2015)

    2015

  43. [43]

    Russano, A

    G. Russano, A. Cavalleri, A. Cesarini, R. Dolesi, V. Fer- roni, F. Gibert, R. Giusteri, M. Hueller, L. Liu, P. Pi- vato, H. B. Tu, D. Vetrugno, S. Vitale, and W. J. Weber, Measuring fN force variations in the presence of constant nn forces: a torsion pendulum ground test of the lisa pathfinder free-fall mode, Classical and Quantum Grav- ity35, 035017 (2018)

    2018

  44. [44]

    A. M. Gretarsson and G. M. Harry, Dissipation of me- chanical energy in fused silica fibers, Review of Scientific Instruments70, 4081 (1999)

    1999

  45. [45]

    Cagnoli, L

    G. Cagnoli, L. Gammaitoni, J. Hough, J. Kovalik, S. McIntosh, M. Punturo, and S. Rowan, Very highQ measurements on a fused silica monolithic pendulum for use in enhanced gravity wave detectors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2442 (2000)

    2000

  46. [46]

    G. I. Gonz´ alez and P. R. Saulson, Brownian motion of a mass suspended by an anelastic wire, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America96, 207 (1994)

    1994

  47. [47]

    Armano, H

    M. Armano, H. Audley, J. Baird, M. Bassan, P. Bi- netruy, M. Born, D. Bortoluzzi, E. Castelli, A. Cavalleri, A. Cesarini, V. Chiavegato, A. M. Cruise, D. D. Bosco, K. Danzmann, M. D. D. Silva, R. D. Rosa, L. D. Fiore, I. Diepholz, G. Dixon, R. Dolesi, L. F. V. Ferroni, E. D. Fitzsimons, M. Freschi, L. Gesa, D. Giardini, F. Gibert, R. Giusteri, A. Grado, C...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  48. [48]

    Schroeter, R

    A. Schroeter, R. Nawrodt, R. Schnabel, S. Reid, I. Mar- tin, S. Rowan, C. Schwarz, T. Koettig, R. Neubert, M. Th¨ urk, W. Vodel, A. T¨ unnermann, K. Danzmann, and P. Seidel, On the mechanical quality factors of cryo- genic test masses from fused silica and crystalline quartz (2007), arXiv:0709.4359 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  49. [49]

    Heptonstall, M

    A. Heptonstall, M. A. Barton, A. S. Bell, A. Bohn, G. Cagnoli, A. Cumming, A. Grant, E. Gustafson, G. D. Hammond, J. Hough, R. Jones, R. Kumar, K. Lee, I. W. Martin, N. A. Robertson, S. Rowan, K. A. Strain, and K. V. Tokmakov, Enhanced characteristics of fused sil- ica fibers using laser polishing, Classical and Quantum Gravity31, 105006 (2014)

    2014

  50. [50]

    R. F. Greene and H. B. Callen, On a theorem of irre- versible thermodynamics. ii, Phys. Rev.88, 1387 (1952)

    1952

  51. [51]

    Cagnoli, J

    G. Cagnoli, J. Hough, D. DeBra, M. Fejer, E. Gustafson, S. Rowan, and V. Mitrofanov, Damping dilution factor for a pendulum in an interferometric gravitational waves detector, Physics Letters A272, 39 (2000)

    2000

  52. [52]

    Zhang, H

    L. Zhang, H. Yan, X. Chen, and J. Zhang, Thick lu- nar crust amplifies deci-hertz gravitational-wave signals, Phys. Rev. Lett. (2026)

    2026

  53. [53]

    Ajith, S

    P. Ajith, S. Babak, Y. Chen, M. Hewitson, B. Krish- nan, J. T. Whelan, B. Br¨ ugmann, P. Diener, J. Gonzalez, M. Hannam, S. Husa, M. Koppitz, D. Pollney, L. Rez- zolla, L. Santamar ´ ıa, A. M. Sintes, U. Sperhake, and J. Thornburg, A phenomenological template family for black-hole coalescence waveforms, Classical and Quan- tum Gravity24, S689 (2007)

    2007

  54. [54]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  55. [55]

    Smetana, R

    J. Smetana, R. Walters, S. Bauchinger, A. S. Ubhi, S. Cooper, D. Hoyland, R. Abbott, C. Baune, P. Fritchel, O. Gerberding, S. K¨ ohnke, H. Miao, S. Rode, and D. Martynov, Compact michelson interferometers with subpicometer sensitivity, Phys. Rev. Appl.18, 034040 (2022)

    2022

  56. [56]

    A. S. Ubhi, L. Koponen, J. Smetana, Y. Xia, H. Miao, E. Chick, J. Bryant, G. Pratten, T. Zhang, R. Mittleman, P. Fritschel, A. V. Cumming, G. Hammond, and D. Mar- tynov, Extending ground-based gravitational-wave sensi- tivity to 5 hz (2026), arXiv:2602.23531 [astro-ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  57. [57]

    J. J. Carter, P. Birckigt, O. Gerberding, and S. M. Koehlenbeck, Compact inertial sensors for measuring ex- ternal disturbances of physics experiments, Scientific Re- ports14, 17775 (2024)

    2024

  58. [58]

    S. C. Subrahmanya, J. J. Carter, and O. Gerberding, Demonstration of a compact optical resonator-based dis- placement sensing technique with sub-femtometer preci- sion (2026), arXiv:2605.03435 [physics.ins-det]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  59. [59]

    H. J. Paik, Superconducting tunable-diaphragm trans- ducer for sensitive acceleration measurements, Journal of Applied Physics47, 1168 (1976). 10

    1976

  60. [60]

    R. L. Fagaly, Superconducting quantum interference de- vice instruments and applications, Review of Scientific Instruments77, 101101 (2006)

    2006

  61. [61]

    Matichard, M

    F. Matichard, M. Evans, R. Mittleman, M. MacInnis, S. Biscans, K. L. Dooley, H. Sohier, A. Lauriero, H. Paris, J. Koch, P. Knothe, A. Carbajo, and C. Dufort, Modeling and experiment of the suspended seismometer concept for attenuating the contribution of tilt motion in hor- izontal measurements, Review of Scientific Instruments 87, 065002 (2016)

    2016

  62. [62]

    Matichard and M

    F. Matichard and M. Evans, Review: Tilt-free low-noise seismometry, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America105, 497 (2015)

    2015

  63. [63]

    Lognonn´ e and B

    P. Lognonn´ e and B. Mosser, Planetary seismology, Sur- veys in Geophysics14, 239 (1993)

    1993

  64. [64]

    Lognonn´ e, M

    P. Lognonn´ e, M. Le Feuvre, C. L. Johnson, and R. C. Weber, Moon meteoritic seismic hum: Steady state pre- diction, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets114 (2009)

    2009

  65. [65]

    A. T. Ringler and C. R. Hutt, Self-noise models of seis- mic instruments, Seismological Research Letters81, 972 (2010)

    2010

  66. [66]

    Sch¨ orghofer, J.-P

    N. Sch¨ orghofer, J.-P. Williams, and E. Mazarico, Lunar north polar cold traps based on diurnally and seasonally varying temperatures, The Planetary Science Journal5, 126 (2024)

    2024

  67. [67]

    Z. Yin, N. Liu, and Y.-Q. Jin, Simulation of the tem- peratures in the permanently shadowed region of the moon’s south pole and data validation, Icarus411, 115917 (2024)

    2024

  68. [68]

    Armano, H

    M. Armano, H. Audley, J. Baird, P. Binetruy, M. Born, D. Bortoluzzi, E. Castelli, A. Cavalleri, A. Cesarini, A. M. Cruise, K. Danzmann, M. d. D. Silva, I. Diepholz, G. Dixon, R. Dolesi, L. Ferraioli, V. Ferroni, E. D. Fitzsimons, M. Freschi, L. Gesa, F. Gibert, D. Giar- dini, R. Giusteri, C. Grimani, J. Grzymisch, I. Harri- son, G. Heinzel, M. Hewitson, D...

    2019

  69. [69]

    Y. Xia, D. Martynov, H. Yang, and H. Miao, Sup- porting data and analysis for this paper, 10.5281/zen- odo.20175633 (2026)

    doi:10.5281/zen- 2026