Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 60 references

Spin-Lock NMR, tuned to the proton Larmor frequency via the Hartmann–Hahn resonance, determines a shallow NV center's depth from the 1H NMR dip of immersion oil and closely matches the established XY8 protocol on multiple centers.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 17:04 UTC pith:A6ENEVTE

load-bearing objection Solid spin-lock depth method with a genuinely new fit function; the Markovian caveat is legitimate but not fatal. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.17734 v1 pith:A6ENEVTE submitted 2026-07-20 cond-mat.mes-hall quant-ph

Depth Determination of Individual Shallow NV-Centers via Spin-Lock NMR

Aaron Daniel , Beat B\"urgler , Patrick Maletinsky , Patrick Potts This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hall quant-ph
keywords NV centersdepth determinationSpin-Lock NMRHartmann-Hahn resonance1H NMRXY8 dynamical decouplingquantum sensingmaster equation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper tries to establish Spin-Lock NMR as a quantitative alternative to the standard XY8 dynamical-decoupling protocol for measuring how far below a diamond's surface an individual nitrogen-vacancy (NV) center sits. The depth is extracted from the 1H nuclear magnetic resonance signal of immersion oil on the diamond, using a fit function derived from a Markovian master equation that ties the measured spin contrast directly to the NV depth. The authors show that Spin-Lock NMR is immune to the harmonic and subharmonic responses that let XY8 pick up unwanted 13C signal, and that its spectral resolution is better than 0.5 kHz at the 500 G bias field where XY8 manages only a few kHz. Applied to four NV centers, the Spin-Lock depths agree with XY8 depths to within a few percent, and the same model is used to analyze a ubiquitous 1H adsorbate layer on clean diamond. A sympathetic reader would care because accurate single-NV depth is a prerequisite for quantitative scanning NV magnetometry and other nanoscale sensing.

Core claim

The central claim is that when the Spin-Lock Rabi frequency is tuned to the 1H Larmor frequency (the Hartmann–Hahn condition), the decay of the spin-locked NV state is an exponential whose rate is set by the 1H magnetic noise spectral density at that frequency. Evaluating that spectral density for a semi-infinite proton layer gives a closed-form fit function, S_c = exp[-(γ_NV^2 τ/2) C_NMR L(Δ)] with C_NMR = 5ρ_V(ħμ0γ_H)^2/(1536π d_NV^3), so the NV depth d_NV and the proton correlation time T_nuc are the only free parameters. The paper reports that this function fits the measured Spin-Lock spectra on four individual NV centers and yields depths in close agreement with the XY8-based protocol (

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Spin-Lock sequence itself: a continuous resonant microwave drive of Rabi frequency Ω_R that dresses the NV spin into eigenstates |±⟩ separated by ℏΩ_R, creating a narrow band-pass noise filter centered at Ω_R. Tuning Ω_R to the proton Larmor frequency activates the Hartmann–Hahn resonance, so the NV only responds to 1H noise at that frequency. The quantitative link to depth is the Markovian master equation for the dressed-state populations, whose solution is the exponential spin contrast S_c = exp(−τ/T1ρ); inserting the dipolar spectral density of a semi-infinite proton layer yields the depth-dependent coefficient C_NMR ∝ 1/d_NV^3. This coefficient is what conv

Load-bearing premise

The derivation assumes the proton bath loses its memory quickly compared with the spin-lock relaxation time (T_nuc/T1ρ ≪ 1); in the reported data this ratio reaches roughly 0.27 on resonance, so the Markovian approximation is only marginally satisfied and, if it fails, the exponential fit function and the depth it returns could be systematically biased.

What would settle it

Acquire Spin-Lock NMR spectra on the same NV at several different spin-lock durations τ: the model predicts that fitting every spectrum with the paper's exponential fit function returns the same d_NV and T_nuc, so a systematic drift of the fitted depth with τ, or a deviation of S_c from a single exponential, would falsify the Markovian model. A complementary check is to compare Spin-Lock depths against an independent, non-NMR depth measurement of the same NV, such as a stray-field reconstruction from a known magnetic nanostructure.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

If this is right

  • Spin-Lock NMR can determine single-NV depths from 1H NMR without contamination by 13C subharmonics, so it works on natural-abundance diamond as well as isotopically purified material.
  • At the 500 G bias field that maximizes optical contrast and nuclear hyperpolarization, Spin-Lock achieves spectral resolution below 0.5 kHz, more than ten times better than XY8's instrument limit, so narrow 1H lineshapes can be sampled densely.
  • The depth extracted from Spin-Lock is set by the area of the NMR dip, so power-fluctuation broadening of the line does not bias the depth; the paper attributes the observed broadening to microwave power drift and argues it leaves the area unchanged.
  • The same model, with the semi-infinite layer replaced by a finite layer of thickness Z, yields a way to estimate the thickness of 1H-containing adsorbate layers on clean diamond; the paper finds fitted thicknesses of several nanometers, suggesting water alone cannot explain the ubiquitous proton signal.
  • If correct, the protocol provides a reliable alternative to XY8 for quantitative depth determination, with particular advantages when harmonic contamination, high fields, or narrow lineshapes limit pulsed decoupling.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The systematically lower T_nuc values from Spin-Lock compared with XY8 suggest the method's linewidth is currently limited by Rabi-frequency instability; actively stabilizing or tracking the microwave amplitude should narrow the line and recover the intrinsic proton correlation time, improving depth precision further.
  • Because the fit depends on ρ_V/d_NV^3, any uncertainty in proton density maps into only a cube-root uncertainty in depth; extending the method to other proton-bearing overlayers, such as biological films or polymer coatings, would inherit this favorable sensitivity.
  • A direct test of the Markovian assumption is to vary the spin-lock duration τ and check whether fitted d_NV and T_nuc remain constant; deviations from a single exponential at long τ would reveal bath memory effects beyond the Lorentzian model.
  • The successful use of Spin-Lock for depth suggests it could serve as a general frequency-selective noise spectrometer for near-surface spin baths in other host materials, not just proton NMR in diamond.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper introduces Spin-Lock NMR as an alternative to XY8 dynamical-decoupling NMR for measuring the 1H signal of immersion oil on diamond and for determining the depth of individual shallow NV centers. The authors derive a Born–Markov master equation for the dressed NV under a continuous resonant drive (Sec. II and Apps. A–C), leading to the closed-form fit function Eq. (16), S_c = exp[-(γ_NV^2 τ/2) C_NMR L(Δ)], with C_NMR ∝ ρ_V/d_NV^3. The method is validated on four NVs against the established XY8 protocol, reporting relative depth differences <3%, and is shown to avoid the 13C subharmonic contamination and to offer higher spectral resolution (0.30 kHz vs 4.93 kHz in Fig. 2(C)). The paper also applies the method to the ubiquitous 1H adsorbate layer and finds that a water-like layer alone cannot explain the signal.

Significance. If the central result holds, Spin-Lock NMR is a valuable, quantitative alternative to XY8 for single-NV depth determination: it removes harmonic ambiguities, improves spectral resolution at high bias fields, and comes with an analytic fit function derived from the Hamiltonian rather than from a phenomenological filter model. The derivation in Apps. A–C is careful and self-contained, and the geometric coefficient C_NMR is explicit and testable. The experimental comparison with XY8 across four NVs, the 13C-control experiment, and the resolution demonstration are all meaningful steps. The main uncertainties are the marginal Markovian condition for some of the fitted parameters and the small number of NVs; these do not undermine the likely significance of the method if the robustness questions are quantified.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. II, after Eq. (5); App. A; Fig. 3 caption] The Born–Markov condition stated after Eq. (5) is T_nuc/T1ρ ≪ 1. Using the paper's own fitted values, T_nuc reaches 27.39 ± 1.89 μs while T1ρ can be as low as ~100 μs, giving ratios of order 0.2–0.3 for some NVs. This is not the deep Markovian regime, and non-Markovian corrections to the rate equation could bias the exponential fit function Eq. (16) and hence d_NV. The <3% agreement with XY8 is reassuring, but both fits assume a Lorentzian bath model, so it is not an independent test of Markovianity. Please add a quantitative check: for example, verify the exponential decay predicted by Eq. (10) by measuring S_c(τ) at fixed detuning, compare depths fitted from different τ values, or compute the leading non-Markovian correction for the exponential-correlation bath used in App. C.
  2. [Sec. II, power-broadening robustness argument] The manuscript argues that microwave power fluctuations broaden the Spin-Lock dip but do not affect d_NV because the depth is set by the area of the dip. This is plausible for a linear Lorentzian, but Eq. (16) is exponential in L(Δ). For finite contrast and a finite fit window, the area under 1−S_c is not strictly invariant under convolution with a Rabi-frequency distribution, and the normalization procedure in App. E (manual background subtraction and Lorentzian centering) can affect the apparent area. The observation that the XY8 and Spin-Lock areas agree to <3% is helpful, but a quantitative simulation or derivation of the residual bias in d_NV from the stated power-fluctuation mechanism would make the robustness claim load-bearing rather than heuristic.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 3 and Sec. II] Please provide an explicit table of fitted d_NV and T_nuc values with errors for each NV and each sequence, together with the Spin-Lock durations τ and XY8 repetition numbers used. The text reports only a range (10–20 nm) and a <3% statement; the central quantitative claim is hard to verify without the individual numbers.
  2. [Fig. 2(C) and Sec. I] The statement that the Spin-Lock spectral resolution is 0.30 kHz would benefit from a precise definition of how this number is derived from the Rabi-frequency step size, and from a statement of the corresponding Rabi calibration uncertainty.
  3. [App. E] The manual selection of the background region and the per-segment Lorentzian centering could introduce bias. Please state how sensitive the final fitted d_NV is to the choice of background window and to the alignment procedure.
  4. [App. C] Eq. (C31), the two-dimensional surface-density result, is derived but not used. Either use it in the adsorbate analysis or note explicitly that it is provided for completeness.
  5. [References] Reference [30] appears to describe color centers in SiC rather than NV centers in diamond; please verify the citation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: Eq. (16) is a genuine derivation and the depth cross-check against XY8 is an external benchmark.

full rationale

The central depth-extraction function is derived from the Hamiltonian of Eq. (3) via a Born-Markov master equation (Eq. (5) and App. A), a solution for the spin contrast (Eq. (10), App. B), and the geometric dipolar integral (Eqs. (C25)-(C28)); d_NV enters only as a free parameter in the final fit function Eq. (16), not as a pre-imposed result. The validation against XY8 is an independent external protocol (Pham et al., Ref. [21]) with separate fits on the same NVs, so the <3% agreement is not forced by construction. The use of an exponential correlation time T_nuc follows Ref. [21] as an explicit modeling assumption, and T_nuc is a fitted parameter rather than a quantity chosen to reproduce d_NV. The only self-citation in the derivational chain is Ref. [52] for the standard Born-Markov/Redfield procedure; since the full calculation is reproduced in the appendices, it is not load-bearing. The manuscript itself flags the Markovian validity condition (T_nuc/T1rho << 1), and the fitted values in Fig. 3 show this is only marginally well satisfied for some NVs; this is a possible accuracy limitation, not a circular step, because the derivation does not presuppose the fitted depth or the agreement with XY8. The shared proton-density and geometric model between XY8 and Spin-Lock contributes common systematic uncertainty, but does not by construction reproduce the depth values.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central derivation rests on standard Markovian open-quantum-system assumptions plus a geometric model for the proton bath. The only fitted physical parameters are the measurand d_NV and the correlation time T_nuc. No new particles or entities are introduced. The most fragile input is the Markovian assumption, which is only marginally satisfied for the reported T_nuc values.

free parameters (3)
  • NV depth d_NV = ~10-20 nm across four NVs (Fig. 3)
    The central measurand; free fit parameter in Eq. (16) for both XY8 and Spin-Lock spectra.
  • Nuclear correlation time T_nuc = 12.8-27.4 μs (Spin-Lock), 26.9-42.4 μs (XY8)
    Free fit parameter setting the Lorentzian width of the 1H NMR dip.
  • Adsorbate layer thickness Z = 3.3-9.4 nm in Sec. III
    Free fit parameter in the finite-thickness layer model Eq. (17), with d_NV fixed to oil-derived values.
axioms (7)
  • domain assumption The 1H bath is Markovian, with correlation time T_nuc much shorter than the Spin-Lock relaxation time T1ρ, and the initial state factorizes.
    Invoked in Sec. II and App. A; the fitted T_nuc values (13-27 μs) and T1ρ (≥~100 μs) give ratios up to ~0.27, so the approximation is only marginally satisfied.
  • domain assumption The nuclear bath is in an infinite-temperature state with no net magnetization.
    App. A Eq. (A12); valid because the nuclear Zeeman splitting at ~2 MHz corresponds to <1 mK.
  • standard math Rotating-wave approximation and truncation of the NV to a two-level system (|0>, |-1>).
    Used to go from Eq. (3) to Eq. (4); justified by ω0 ≫ ωL, ΩR and near-resonant driving.
  • domain assumption Nuclear spin correlations decay as e^{-|t|/T_nuc}, with a single T_nuc and Lorentzian spectral lineshape.
    Eq. (11) and App. C; models molecular diffusion through the sensing volume following Pham et al.
  • domain assumption The oil layer is a semi-infinite uniform volume density ρ_V = 68 nm^-3 with a sharp boundary at the diamond surface.
    App. C; depth enters as d_NV^-3 through the geometric integral; ρ_V is taken from Pham et al. [21].
  • ad hoc to paper For the adsorbate analysis, the surface layer has the proton density of liquid water (67 nm^-3) and uniform thickness Z.
    Sec. III; used to interpret the ubiquitous 1H signal, but the paper concludes water alone cannot explain the data.
  • domain assumption Secular approximation in the dressed basis: 2Ω_R T1ρ >> 1.
    App. A Eq. (A31); satisfied since Ω_R ≈ 2π×2 MHz and T1ρ ~ 100 μs.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 27430 in / 18302 out tokens · 197610 ms · 2026-08-01T17:04:42.954801+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Depth Determination of Individual Shallow NV-Centers via Spin-Lock NMR." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/A6ENEVTE

@misc{pith2026260717734,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Depth Determination of Individual Shallow NV-Centers via Spin-Lock NMR},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/A6ENEVTE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.17734}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Quantitative quantum sensing with shallow electron spins, such as those hosted by nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centers in diamond, requires accurate knowledge of the spin's depth below the host material's surface. A widely used approach infers this depth from the 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) signal of immersion oil on the diamond surface that can be detected using dynamical decoupling sequences such as XY8. However, finite-width pulses make XY8 sensitive to subharmonic responses, including unwanted contributions from nearby 13C spins, and its instrument-limited spectral resolution provides only sparse sampling of the narrow 1H NMR lineshape. Here, we introduce Spin-Lock NMR as an alternative approach to single-NV depth determination. By tuning the Spin-Lock Rabi frequency to the 1H Larmor frequency, the NV probes the 1H NMR signal through the Hartmann-Hahn resonance without the harmonic ambiguities of pulsed decoupling sequences and with substantially higher instrument-limited spectral resolution. We derive a quantitative Spin-Lock NMR fit function from a Markovian master equation that directly relates the measured spectrum to the NV depth. Our approach yields NV depth estimates in excellent agreement with the established XY8-based protocol across multiple NV centers and establishes Spin-Lock NMR as a robust alternative for quantitative single-NV depth determination. To demonstrate its applicability, we employ our method to investigate the 1H nuclear spin signal that is regularly reported to be present on diamond, even in the absence of immersion oil.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.17734 by Aaron Daniel, Beat B\"urgler, Patrick Maletinsky, Patrick Potts.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: To extract the NV depth dNV, the XY8 spectra are fit￾ted using the model by Pham et al. [21], while the Spin￾Lock spectra are fitted with Eq. (16). In both cases, the free fit parameters are dNV and Tnuc, while the 1H spin density of the immersion oil is fixed to ρV = 68 nm−3 [21]. The extracted NV depths are listed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (E), and only then averaged to obtain the final spectrum in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_6.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Here, the first term describes the transition frequency ω0 of the effective NV two-level system spanned by|0⟩ and|−1⟩

    Rotating-frame Hamiltonian We start from the lab-frame Hamiltonian ˆHlab =ℏω 0 ˆSz + 2ℏΩR cos(ω0t) ˆSx (A1) +ℏγ NV ˆBN · ˆS+ℏω L X j ˆI j z . Here, the first term describes the transition frequency ω0 of the effective NV two-level system spanned by|0⟩ and|−1⟩. The second term describes the resonant Spin- Locking microwave field of Rabi frequency 2Ω R (the...

  2. [2]

    background

    Born–Markov equation The total density matrix is denoted by ˆρ tot, and the reduced NV density matrix is ˆρNV(t) = Trnuc {ˆρtot(t)}.(A10) We assume that the initial state factorizes as ˆρtot(0) = ˆρNV(0)⊗ˆρB,(A11) where ˆρB is the stationary state of the 1H bath. For the present application we take this state to be the infinite- temperature state, ˆρB = N...

  3. [3]

    M. W. Doherty, N. B. Manson, P. Delaney, F. Jelezko, J. Wrachtrup, and L. C. L. Hollenberg,The nitrogen- vacancy colour centre in diamond, Physics Reports528, 1 (2013)

    2013

  4. [4]

    J. F. Barry, M. J. Turner, J. M. Schloss, D. R. Glenn, Y. Song, M. D. Lukin, H. Park, and R. L. Walsworth, Optical magnetic detection of single-neuron action poten- tials using quantum defects in diamond, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences113, 14133 (2016)

    2016

  5. [5]

    D. R. Glenn, R. R. Fu, P. Kehayias, D. Le Sage, E. A. Lima, B. P. Weiss, and R. L. Walsworth, Micrometer-scale magnetic imaging of geological sam- ples using a quantum diamond microscope, Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems18, 3254 (2017)

    2017

  6. [6]

    Casola, T

    F. Casola, T. van der Sar, and A. Yacoby,Probing condensed matter physics with magnetometry based on nitrogen-vacancy centres in diamond, Nat Rev Mater3, 1 (2018)

    2018

  7. [7]

    X. Wang, W. Li, B. Moran, B. C. Gibson, L. T. Hall, D. A. Simpson, A. N. Kealy, and A. D. Green- tree,Quantum Diamond Magnetometry for Navigation in GNSS Denied Environments, in J. T. Freymueller and L. S´ anchez (editors),Gravity, Positioning and Reference Frames, pp. 87–92 (Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham) (2024)

    2024

  8. [8]

    Balasubramanian, P

    G. Balasubramanian, P. Neumann, D. Twitchen, M. Markham, R. Kolesov, N. Mizuochi, J. Isoya, J. Achard, J. Beck, J. Tissler, V. Jacques, P. R. Hemmer, F. Jelezko, and J. Wrachtrup,Ultralong spin coherence time in isotopically engineered diamond, Nature Mater8, 383 (2009)

    2009

  9. [9]

    Bar-Gill, L

    N. Bar-Gill, L. M. Pham, A. Jarmola, D. Budker, and R. L. Walsworth,Solid-state electronic spin coherence time approaching one second, Nature Communications4, 19 1743 (2013)

    2013

  10. [10]

    T. A. Kennedy, J. S. Colton, J. E. Butler, R. C. Linares, and P. J. Doering,Long coherence times at 300 K for nitrogen-vacancy center spins in diamond grown by chem- ical vapor deposition, Appl. Phys. Lett.83, 4190 (2003)

    2003

  11. [11]

    Tetienne, L

    J.-P. Tetienne, L. Rondin, P. Spinicelli, M. Chipaux, T. Debuisschert, J.-F. Roch, and V. Jacques,Magnetic- field-dependent photodynamics of single NV defects in di- amond: an application to qualitative all-optical magnetic imaging, New J. Phys.14, 103033 (2012)

    2012

  12. [12]

    Harrison, M

    J. Harrison, M. J. Sellars, and N. B. Manson,Optical spin polarisation of the N-V centre in diamond, Journal of Luminescence107, 245 (2004)

    2004

  13. [13]

    Fujiwara, S

    M. Fujiwara, S. Sun, A. Dohms, Y. Nishimura, K. Suto, Y. Takezawa, K. Oshimi, L. Zhao, N. Sadzak, Y. Ume- hara, Y. Teki, N. Komatsu, O. Benson, Y. Shikano, and E. Kage-Nakadai,Real-time nanodiamond thermom- etry probing in vivo thermogenic responses, Sci Adv6, eaba9636 (2020)

    2020

  14. [14]

    Maletinsky, S

    P. Maletinsky, S. Hong, M. S. Grinolds, B. Hausmann, M. D. Lukin, R. L. Walsworth, M. Loncar, and A. Ya- coby,A robust scanning diamond sensor for nanoscale imaging with single nitrogen-vacancy centres, Nature Nanotechnology7, 320 (2012)

    2012

  15. [15]

    Thiel, Z

    L. Thiel, Z. Wang, M. A. Tschudin, D. Rohner, I. Guti´ errez-Lezama, N. Ubrig, M. Gibertini, E. Gian- nini, A. F. Morpurgo, and P. Maletinsky,Probing mag- netism in 2D materials at the nanoscale with single-spin microscopy, Science364, 973 (2019)

    2019

  16. [16]

    Dubois, D

    A. Dubois, D. Broadway, A. Stark, M. Tschudin, A. Healey, S. Huber, J.-P. Tetienne, E. Greplova, and P. Maletinsky,Untrained Physically Informed Neural Network for Image Reconstruction of Magnetic Field Sources, Phys. Rev. Appl.18, 064076 (2022)

    2022

  17. [17]

    Z. Xu, M. L. Palm, W. Huxter, K. Herb, J. M. Aben- droth, K. Bouzehouane, O. Boulle, M. S. Gabor, J. Ur- restarazu Larranaga, A. Morales, J. Rhensius, G. Puebla- Hellmann, and C. L. Degen,Minimizing Sensor-Sample Distances in Scanning Nitrogen-Vacancy Magnetometry, ACS Nano19(2025)

    2025

  18. [18]

    J. F. Ziegler, J. P. Biersack, and M. D. Ziegler,SRIM: The Stopping and Range of Ions in Matter, (SRIM) (2012)

    2012

  19. [19]

    Lehtinen, B

    O. Lehtinen, B. Naydenov, P. B¨ orner, K. Melentjevic, C. M¨ uller, L. P. McGuinness, S. Pezzagna, J. Meijer, U. Kaiser, and F. Jelezko,Molecular dynamics simula- tions of shallow nitrogen and silicon implantation into diamond, Phys. Rev. B93, 035202 (2016)

    2016

  20. [20]

    D. M. Toyli, C. D. Weis, G. D. Fuchs, T. Schenkel, and D. D. Awschalom,Chip-Scale Nanofabrication of Single Spins and Spin Arrays in Diamond, Nano Lett.10, 3168 (2010)

    2010

  21. [21]

    Appel, B

    P. Appel, B. J. Shields, T. Kosub, N. Hedrich, R. H¨ ubner, J. Faßbender, D. Makarov, and P. Maletinsky,Nano- magnetism of magnetoelectric granular thin-film antifer- romagnets, Nano Letters19, 1682 (2019)

    2019

  22. [22]

    Pellet-Mary, D

    C. Pellet-Mary, D. Dutta, M. A. Tschudin, P. Sieg- wolf, B. Gross, D. A. Broadway, J. Cox, C. Schrader, J. Happacher, D. G. Chica, C. R. Dean, X. Roy, and P. Maletinsky,Lateral exchange bias for n´ eel-vector con- trol in atomically thin antiferromagnets, Nat. Commun. 16, 9725 (2025)

    2025

  23. [23]

    L. M. Pham, S. J. DeVience, F. Casola, I. Lovchinsky, A. O. Sushkov, E. Bersin, J. Lee, E. Urbach, P. Cap- pellaro, H. Park, A. Yacoby, M. Lukin, and R. L. Walsworth,Nmr technique for determining the depth of shallow nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond, Phys. Rev. B93, 045425 (2016)

    2016

  24. [24]

    Gullion, D

    T. Gullion, D. B. Baker, and M. S. Conradi,New, com- pensated Carr-Purcell sequences, Journal of Magnetic Resonance (1969)89, 479 (1990)

    1969

  25. [25]

    M. J. Biercuk, A. C. Doherty, and H. Uys,Dynamical de- coupling sequence construction as a filter-design problem, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.44, 154002 (2011)

    2011

  26. [26]

    D. B. Bucher, D. P. L. Aude Craik, M. P. Backlund, M. J. Turner, O. Ben Dor, D. R. Glenn, and R. L. Walsworth, Quantum diamond spectrometer for nanoscale NMR and ESR spectroscopy, Nat Protoc14, 2707 (2019)

    2019

  27. [27]

    R. D. Allert, K. D. Briegel, and D. B. Bucher,Ad- vances in nano- and microscale NMR spectroscopy us- ing diamond quantum sensors, Chem. Commun.58, 8165 (2022)

    2022

  28. [28]

    K. S. Liu, A. Henning, M. W. Heindl, R. D. Allert, J. D. Bartl, I. D. Sharp, R. Rizzato, and D. B. Bucher,Surface NMR using quantum sensors in diamond, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences119, e2111607119 (2022)

    2022

  29. [29]

    Loretz, J

    M. Loretz, J. Boss, T. Rosskopf, H. Mamin, D. Ru- gar, and C. Degen,Spurious Harmonic Response of Mul- tipulse Quantum Sensing Sequences, Phys. Rev. X5, 021009 (2015)

    2015

  30. [30]

    Jacques, P

    V. Jacques, P. Neumann, J. Beck, M. Markham, D. Twitchen, J. Meijer, F. Kaiser, G. Balasubramanian, F. Jelezko, and J. Wrachtrup,Dynamic Polarization of Single Nuclear Spins by Optical Pumping of Nitrogen- Vacancy Color Centers in Diamond at Room Tempera- ture, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 057403 (2009)

    2009

  31. [31]

    J. M. Boss, K. S. Cujia, J. Zopes, and C. L. Degen,Quan- tum sensing with arbitrary frequency resolution, Science 356, 837 (2017)

    2017

  32. [32]

    Jiang, H

    Z. Jiang, H. Cai, R. Cernansky, X. Liu, and W. Gao, Quantum sensing of radio-frequency signal with NV cen- ters in SiC, Science Advances9, eadg2080 (2023)

    2023

  33. [33]

    Casanova, Z.-Y

    J. Casanova, Z.-Y. Wang, J. F. Haase, and M. B. Plenio, Robust dynamical decoupling sequences for individual- nuclear-spin addressing, Phys. Rev. A92, 042304 (2015)

    2015

  34. [34]

    Z.-Y. Wang, J. E. Lang, S. Schmitt, J. Lang, J. Casanova, L. McGuinness, T. S. Monteiro, F. Jelezko, and M. B. Plenio,Randomization of Pulse Phases for Unambigu- ous and Robust Quantum Sensing, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 200403 (2019)

    2019

  35. [35]

    Z. Wang, J. Casanova, and M. B. Plenio,Enhancing the Robustness of Dynamical Decoupling Sequences with Cor- related Random Phases, Symmetry12, 730 (2020)

    2020

  36. [36]

    K. Zeng, X. Yu, M. B. Plenio, and Z.-Y. Wang,Wide- Band Unambiguous Quantum Sensing via Geodesic Evo- lution, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 250801 (2024)

    2024

  37. [37]

    Loretz, T

    M. Loretz, T. Rosskopf, and C. L. Degen,Radio- Frequency Magnetometry Using a Single Electron Spin, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 017602 (2013)

    2013

  38. [38]

    F. Yan, S. Gustavsson, J. Bylander, X. Jin, F. Yoshihara, D. G. Cory, Y. Nakamura, T. P. Orlando, and W. D. Oliver,Rotating-frame relaxation as a noise spectrum analyser of a superconducting qubit undergoing driven evolution, Nature Communications4, 2337 (2013)

    2013

  39. [39]

    Rosskopf, A

    T. Rosskopf, A. Dussaux, K. Ohashi, M. Loretz, R. Schirhagl, H. Watanabe, S. Shikata, K. Itoh, and C. Degen,Investigation of Surface Magnetic Noise by 20 Shallow Spins in Diamond, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 147602 (2014)

    2014

  40. [40]

    M. Kost, J. Cai, and M. B. Plenio,Resolving single molecule structures with Nitrogen-vacancy centers in di- amond, Sci Rep5, 11007 (2015)

    2015

  41. [41]

    J. C. Hermann, R. Rizzato, F. Bruckmaier, R. D. Allert, A. Blank, and D. B. Bucher,Extending radiowave fre- quency detection range with dressed states of solid-state spin ensembles, npj Quantum Inf10, 1 (2024)

    2024

  42. [42]

    J. M. Abendroth, K. Herb, E. Janitz, T. Zhu, L. A. V¨ olker, and C. L. Degen,Single-Nitrogen–Vacancy NMR of Amine-Functionalized Diamond Surfaces, Nano Lett. 22, 7294 (2022)

    2022

  43. [43]

    K. Xu, K. Elkaduwe, R. Khan, S.-J. Lee, D. Nordlund, G. E. L´ opez, A. Wolcott, D. Pagliero, N. Giovambattista, and C. A. Meriles,Nanoscale color center sensing of ad- sorbed water in contact with oil, Advanced Functional Materials36, e17457 (2026)

    2026

  44. [44]

    S. J. DeVience, L. M. Pham, I. Lovchinsky, A. O. Sushkov, N. Bar-Gill, C. Belthangady, F. Casola, M. Cor- bett, H. Zhang, M. Lukin, H. Park, A. Yacoby, and R. L. Walsworth,Nanoscale NMR spectroscopy and imaging of multiple nuclear species, Nature Nanotech10, 129 (2015)

    2015

  45. [45]

    Loretz, S

    M. Loretz, S. Pezzagna, J. Meijer, and C. L. Degen, Nanoscale nuclear magnetic resonance with a 1.9-nm- deep nitrogen-vacancy sensor, Appl. Phys. Lett.104, 033102 (2014)

    2014

  46. [46]

    Rugar, H

    D. Rugar, H. J. Mamin, M. H. Sherwood, M. Kim, C. T. Rettner, K. Ohno, and D. D. Awschalom,Proton mag- netic resonance imaging using a nitrogen-vacancy spin sensor, Nat. Nanotechnol.10, 120 (2015)

    2015

  47. [47]

    Zheng, S

    W. Zheng, S. Zhang, J. Jiang, Y. He, R. St¨ ohr, A. Denisenko, J. Wrachtrup, X. C. Zeng, K. Bian, E.-G. Wang, and Y. Jiang,Experimental observation of liquid- solid transition of nanoconfined water at ambient temper- ature, Nat. Mater.25, 495 (2026)

    2026

  48. [48]

    Bruckmaier, R

    F. Bruckmaier, R. D. Allert, N. R. Neuling, P. Amrein, S. Littin, K. D. Briegel, P. Sch¨ atzle, P. Knittel, M. Za- itsev, and D. B. Bucher,Imaging local diffusion in mi- crostructures using NV-based pulsed field gradient NMR, Science Advances9, eadh3484 (2023)

    2023

  49. [49]

    S. R. Hartmann and E. L. Hahn,Nuclear Double Res- onance in the Rotating Frame, Phys. Rev.128, 2042 (1962)

    2042

  50. [50]

    C. J. Lee, D. Suter, and A. Pines,Theory of multiple- pulse NMR at low and zero fields, Journal of Magnetic Resonance (1969)75, 110 (1987)

    1969

  51. [51]

    A. M. Souza, G. A. ´Alvarez, and D. Suter,Robust Dy- namical Decoupling for Quantum Computing and Quan- tum Memory, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 240501 (2011)

    2011

  52. [52]

    Z. Li, X. Kong, H. Sun, G. Qu, P. Yu, T. Xie, Z. Zhao, G. Shi, Y. Wang, F. Shi, and J. Du,Discovery of an anomalous non-evaporating sub-nanometre water layer in open environment, arXiv:2412.17636 (2024)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  53. [53]

    Staudacher, N

    T. Staudacher, N. Raatz, S. Pezzagna, J. Meijer, F. Rein- hard, C. A. Meriles, and J. Wrachtrup,Probing molecular dynamics at the nanoscale via an individual paramagnetic centre, Nat. Commun.6, 8527 (2015)

    2015

  54. [54]

    Potts,Quantum thermodynamics, SciPost Phys

    P. Potts,Quantum thermodynamics, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes p. 126 (2026)

    2026

  55. [55]

    Redfield,The theory of relaxation processes, in J

    A. Redfield,The theory of relaxation processes, in J. S. Waugh (editor),Advances in Magnetic Resonance,Ad- vances in Magnetic and Optical Resonance, volume 1, pp. 1–32 (Academic Press) (1965)

    1965

  56. [56]

    Waldherr, J

    G. Waldherr, J. Beck, M. Steiner, P. Neumann, A. Gali, T. Frauenheim, F. Jelezko, and J. Wrachtrup,Dark states of single nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond unraveled by single shot NMR, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 157601 (2011)

    2011

  57. [57]

    D. J. Griffiths,Introduction to Electrodynamics(Cam- bridge University Press) (2017)

    2017

  58. [58]

    Degen, F

    C. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P. Cappellaro,Quantum sensing, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 035002 (2017)

    2017

  59. [59]

    J. F. Barry, J. M. Schloss, E. Bauch, M. J. Turner, C. A. Hart, L. M. Pham, and R. L. Walsworth,Sensitivity op- timization for NV-diamond magnetometry, Rev. Mod. Phys.92, 015004 (2020)

    2020

  60. [60]

    Hedrich, D

    N. Hedrich, D. Rohner, M. Batzer, P. Maletinsky, and B. J. Shields,Parabolic Diamond Scanning Probes for Single-Spin Magnetic Field Imaging, Phys. Rev. Applied 14, 064007 (2020)

    2020