Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 50 references

c=-2 conformal blocks solve a modified Riemann-Hilbert problem

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 15:56 UTC pith:E2GXCGXJ

load-bearing objection Genuine extension of the ILT/GM isomonodromy/CFT construction to (1,k), with c=-2 worked out in detail — but the advertised uniqueness proof is a 'checked explicitly' black box that a referee should force open. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.18120 v2 pith:E2GXCGXJ submitted 2026-07-20 math-ph hep-thmath.MP

(1,k) CFT and RH problem with the c=-2 case

Mikhail Bershtein , Andrei Grigorev , Anton Shchechkin This is my paper
classification math-ph hep-thmath.MP MSC 81T4034M56
keywords modified Riemann-Hilbert problem(1,k) Virasoro modelscentral charge c=-2symplectic fermionsperiodic vertex operatorstau functionsconformal blocksisomonodromy/CFT correspondence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper extends the isomonodromy/CFT correspondence from c=1 to the (1,k) Virasoro minimal models, focusing on k=2 which has central charge c=-2. It defines periodic vertex operators—infinite sums of Virasoro vertex operators over lattice-shifted modules—and shows that their correlation functions with two degenerate fields solve a modified Riemann-Hilbert problem with prescribed Fenchel–Nielsen monodromy data. For k>1 the problem has more solutions because the connection acquires apparent singularities; the paper constructs an explicit solution for three punctures at k=2 and proves it is the unique one under two extra normalization conditions. It then derives bilinear differential-difference relations satisfied by c=-2 tau functions, giving concrete identities for a logarithmic CFT where the tau function has a rational determinant.

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 4.4: the matrix-valued functions Φ_i built from radially ordered correlators of periodic vertex operators and two degenerate fields ψ± form a solution of the k-modified Riemann-Hilbert problem, with the intermediate momenta and dual coordinates playing the roles of Fenchel–Nielsen lengths and angles. For k=2 the paper gives an explicit hypergeometric description of the three-puncture solution and proves uniqueness under Φ'(z0)=0 and Φ''(z0) proportional to the identity. The determinant of the solution is a rational function, which, through the operator I(z)=J_+∧J_-, yields three families of bilinear relations for c=-2 tau functions. The construction is conditiona

What carries the argument

The periodic vertex operator—a block operator acting on L_[θ]_k = ⊕_{n∈Z} L_{θ+nk} whose restriction is the Virasoro vertex operator V^{θ_2}_{θ_3+n_3 k, θ_1+n_1 k}—is the object that makes the construction work. Its fusion with degenerate fields is 1-periodic after an appropriate normalization, so correlation functions with two degenerate insertions have constant SL_2 monodromy and yield solutions of the modified Riemann-Hilbert problem. For k=2 the additional structure is the symplectic-fermion field I(z)=J_+(z)∧J_-(z), whose OPE with the tensor square of periodic vertex operators controls the rational determinant and produces the bilinear tau-function relations.

Load-bearing premise

The entire construction rests on the assumption that the infinite series in (4.27) defining the periodic-vertex-operator correlators converges, and that Virasoro conformal blocks are analytic; the authors state this as a conjecture directly after Theorem 4.4.

What would settle it

Compute the series (4.27) numerically for k=2, n=3 at a few generic puncture positions and check whether the monodromy matrices obtained by analytic continuation match the prescribed Fenchel–Nielsen data; if the series diverges or the monodromy differs, Theorem 4.4 is false. Alternatively, evaluate the bilinear relations (5.29) beyond the first few orders of t-expansion and look for a first-order violation.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • For k=2 and n=3 the modified Riemann-Hilbert problem has a unique solution once the extra conditions Φ'(z0)=0 and Φ''(z0)∈C·1 are imposed; this pins down the periodic vertex operators from local-system data.
  • The determinant of the modified RH solution is an explicit rational function, giving an overdetermined set of constraints that close into bilinear relations for c=-2 tau functions.
  • The bilinear relations include algebraic, first-order, and second-order Hirota-type equations, linking the c=-2 tau functions to structures reminiscent of KZ and Toda equations.
  • A generalized Wick theorem expresses correlators with many symplectic-fermion insertions in terms of correlators with at most two insertions, so three-point data determines the vertex operators.
  • For k>1 the solution space of the modified RH problem has dimension at least k^{n-3}, with generic linear combinations parameterized by a tensor Λ∈(C^k)^{⊗(n-3)}.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the conjectured convergence of (4.27) holds for all k≥1, the same construction should give explicit tau functions and bilinear identities for every (1,k) minimal model, not just k=2; the authors note the OPEs become more complicated.
  • The apparent singularities w_j appearing as zeros of det Φ resemble Hecke modifications in the BPS/CFT picture; a testable extension would be to match these zeros with surface-defect fusion data in gauge theory.
  • The bilinear relations for k=2 look like discrete analogues of Painlevé hierarchies; one could try to take suitable limits to recover known Painlevé VI relations or connect them to blowup equations from a different route.
  • The uniqueness result for n=3 suggests a bootstrap: combined with the Wick theorem, it may determine all higher-point c=-2 tau functions purely from local-system data, without input from the normalization formulas.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes an extension of the Iorgov–Lisovyy–Teschner construction of solutions of Riemann–Hilbert problems from Virasoro conformal blocks to the case b^2 = k ∈ Z_{>0}, i.e. central charges c = 1 - 6(k-1)^2/k. For k>1 the authors introduce a modified RH problem with more singular local behaviour at the punctures and construct solutions using periodic vertex operators that are invariant under the appropriate lattice shifts. The central charge c=-2 (k=2) is studied in detail: an explicit three-puncture solution is given in terms of hypergeometric functions, a uniqueness statement is made under additional initial-data conditions, determinant formulae and bilinear tau-function identities are derived, and a generalized Wick theorem for symplectic fermions is proved. The paper is largely conditional: Theorem 4.4 depends on analyticity assumptions and on a conjectured convergence of the infinite series defining the periodic vertex-operator solution, and the uniqueness result in Prop. 4.10 rests on an unshown linear-algebra check.

Significance. If the main construction and the uniqueness claim are correct, the paper provides a substantial new class of explicit solutions of modified RH problems for c=-2 and opens a concrete path toward analogous results for all (1,k) minimal models. The determinant formula (5.16), the bilinear relations (5.29), and the Wick theorem (5.38) are concrete, falsifiable statements that go beyond the previously known c=1 case. The authors are honest about the analyticity/convergence limitations of Theorem 4.4, and the explicit hypergeometric formulas in Prop. 4.11 give a useful testing ground. However, the advertised uniqueness theorem is not proven in the manuscript as written, and the central existence theorem is conditional, so the paper's strongest claims are not yet established at the level of rigour one expects for a journal publication.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 4.4, Prop. 4.10] The uniqueness claim for the 2-modified RH problem with n=3 is not proved. The proof reduces the question to a system of 14 affine-linear equations in 13 variables (12 coefficients of K(z) plus the scalar ν), and then says 'We have checked explicitly that this system has a unique solution.' No coefficient matrix, rank argument, or reproducible computation is supplied. This is load-bearing: the system is overdetermined, so unique solvability requires a specific linear dependence among the 14 equations that is never exhibited. Moreover, the dimension count earlier in §4.4 gives -1 for (k,n)=(2,3), so generic parameter counting cannot be used to support the claim. Remark 5.13 and the reconstruction of periodic vertex operators from RH data rely on this uniqueness. Please provide the explicit linear system, its rank, and the solution, or a reproducible computer algebra verification.
  2. [Sec. 4.3, Theorem 4.4] Theorem 4.4 is stated as a theorem, but the text immediately below it says the theorem is conditional on the assumed analyticity of Virasoro conformal blocks and that convergence of the series in (4.27) is only conjectured for k≥1. Without convergence, the functions Φ_i need not be analytic and the monodromy conclusion is not established. This conditionality affects all subsequent results that rely on Theorem 4.4, including the determinant and bilinear identities. The abstract and introduction present the construction as a proven theorem; the conditional status should be clearly stated in the abstract and throughout, or the convergence should be proved at least for the cases where explicit formulas are available (k=2, n=3, Prop. 4.11).
  3. [Sec. 5.2.4, Theorem 5.10] The proof of the bilinear relations is sketched by comparing expansions (5.31)–(5.32), but the final comparison is not fully written out, and the text states that in the case n=4 the relations were only checked numerically in low orders. If the identities are proven for all n by the OPE/rational-function argument, then the numerical check is merely illustrative and should be labelled as such. If the comparison has not been made rigorously for all n, then Theorem 5.10 is not proven in the manuscript. Please clarify the logical status and, if necessary, provide the full derivation of the coefficient matching.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. 1] The abstract says 'prove its uniqueness under suitable initial data conditions', but Prop. 4.10 contains only 'we have checked explicitly'. Please align the abstract with the actual proof content.
  2. [Example 3.7] Typo: 'Cobsider' should be 'Consider'.
  3. [Sec. 4.4, Eq. (4.35)] The notation A'(z0) is used without specifying that the derivative is with respect to z; please clarify, especially because A(z) also depends on z0.
  4. [Sec. 4.4] The dimension count giving -1 for (k,n)=(2,3) is acknowledged, but the reason for the failure of the independence assumption is not discussed. Please add a comment explaining what this implies for the generic dimension estimate.
  5. [Prop. 4.1] The proof of det(\tilde F^{[ji]})=1 is only 'Direct calculation'; a short derivation or a reference to a supplementary file would be helpful for reproducibility.
  6. [Sec. 5.2.3] The notation τ^{⊗2,(i,j)} is defined in words but could be made more precise with an explicit formula; this would aid readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the CFT-to-RH construction is explicitly engineered but rests on nontrivial monodromy/fusion computations, and the bilinear relations are derived from independent OPE data.

full rationale

The paper's central result, Theorem 4.4, is conditional and partly definitional: the k-modified RH problem (Def. 4.3) is deliberately stated with local exponents (θ_i, 1−k−θ_i) that match the degenerate-field asymptotics (4.23), and the FN-angle dependence is inserted via (4.25) so that the matrices C_{i,i−1} acquire the expected diag(s^{-1/2},s^{1/2}) factors. However, the nontrivial content — that the correlator family (4.27) has constant monodromy and that the resulting local system has the stated FN coordinates — is proved, not assumed, using the fusion/braiding relations of Prop. 3.11 and the normalization choices of Sec. 4.1. The authors honestly flag the convergence/analyticity caveat immediately after Theorem 4.4; this is a rigor limitation, not circularity. The determinant formula and bilinear relations of Sec. 5 are obtained by comparing two independent OPE-based computations of the same correlator/determinant; no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Self-citations ([BS15], [BS19]) appear as context or comparison, not as load-bearing input; the main external ingredients are from [ILT15], [GM16], [PT99] and other prior work. Prop. 4.10's uniqueness claim rests on an unshown 14×13 linear-system check, and the dimension count in §4.4 gives −1 in the (2,3) case, as the authors themselves note; these are serious correctness/rigor concerns but not instances of circular reasoning. Overall, the derivation chain is self-consistent and contains genuine independent computation, so the circularity score is 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 4 axioms · 2 invented entities

The construction has no numerically fitted parameters; the central unproved input is the convergence/analyticity of conformal-block series. The modified RH problem and periodic vertex operators are introduced as mathematical machinery, not as entities with independent falsifiable predictions.

axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Virasoro conformal blocks exist, converge in the relevant regions, and can be analytically continued.
    Sec. 3.3 assumes analyticity of conformal blocks; Theorem 4.4 is explicitly conditional on this.
  • domain assumption The infinite series of conformal blocks defining the periodic vertex operators in (4.27) converges for k≥1.
    Conjectured immediately after Theorem 4.4; needed for (4.27) to define analytic functions with the claimed monodromy.
  • standard math Fusion and braiding relations of the degenerate field ψ± (Prop. 3.11, and the periodic fusion relations (4.14)–(4.16)).
    Taken from the Moore–Seiberg formalism and [ILT15]; used to compute monodromies and local behavior.
  • domain assumption Genericness conditions on θ_i and σ_i (e.g. 2θ_i, 2σ_i ∉ Z) ensuring irreducibility of Verma modules, diagonalizable monodromy, and uniqueness of the standard RH solution.
    Used throughout Sections 2–4; the paper states results for generic tuples and excludes resonances.
invented entities (2)
  • Periodic vertex operators \bar{V}_{[θ_3]_k,[θ_1]_k}(t) no independent evidence
    purpose: Sum over lattice kZ of Virasoro vertex operators to make fusion with degenerate fields periodic and to construct modified RH solutions.
    Mathematical object defined in Def. 4.2; its existence as a convergent operator is the conjectured convergence assumption, and no independent observable handle is provided.
  • k-modified Riemann–Hilbert problem and apparent singularities w_j no independent evidence
    purpose: Encode the more singular local behavior of conformal-block solutions for k>1 and the extra zeros of det Φ.
    Definition 4.3 is chosen to match CFT local behavior; the authors note it is not yet motivated independently from the isomonodromy side.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 41389 in / 13193 out tokens · 130387 ms · 2026-08-01T15:56:06.091735+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Following approach of Iorgov--Lisovyy--Teschner, we construct solutions of the (modified) Riemann--Hilbert problem using conformal blocks of $(1,k)$ Virasoro models. For $k>1$ case, the solution of this Riemann--Hilbert problem is not unique due to more singular behavior at punctures. On the CFT side the dimension of the space of conformal blocks also increases. We specifically study the $k=2$ case, which corresponds to the central charge $c=-2$ and symplectic fermions. We explicitly construct a corresponding solution of the modified Riemann--Hilbert problem in the case of 3 punctures and prove its uniqueness under suitable initial data conditions. We also obtain new bilinear relations for $c=-2$ tau functions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.18120 by Andrei Grigorev, Anton Shchechkin, Mikhail Bershtein.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Fundamental group generators γi where ∼ stands for the overall SL2(C)-conjugation. Linear system. A natural source of the fundamental group representations are the monodromy groups of the Fuchsian flat connections. Namely, consider holomorphic sl2-connections on the trivial bundle over CP1 \{ti} n i=1 of the form A(z) = Xn i=1 Ai z − ti dz, Ai ∈ sl2(C) (2.3) and the corresponding linear system together wit… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Pants decomposition of the Riemann sphere with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Dissected Riemann sphere with punctures Single-valued formulation on dissection. The other formulation of the RH problem is given in the setting of the single-valued functions on dissected CP1 instead of the multi-valued functions on the whole CP1 \{ti} n i=1. For definiteness, we order the punctures in the absolute value increasing order2 0 ≤ |t1| < |t2| < · · · < |tn−1| < |tn| ≤ ∞. Then CP1 is dissected … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Three pants decompositions of the four-punctured sphere. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Trinion with braiding and fusion paths Proposition 3.11 (Fusion relations [ILT15, (3.31abc)]). i) The compositions of the degenerate field ψς , ς = ±, with the generic vertex operator V p2 (t) are related by the following fusion formulas ψ • −ς (z) V p2 p3− ς 2 b 2, p1 [v2](t) = X ς ′=± F [23] ςς′ V p2− ς ′ 2 b 2 p3,p1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_5.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 41 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    and Fateev, Vladimir A

    Alba, Vasyl A. and Fateev, Vladimir A. and Litvinov, Alexey V. and Tarnopolskiy, Grigory M. On combinatorial expansion of the conformal blocks arising from AGT conjecture. Lett. Math. Phys. 2011. doi:10.1007/s11005-011-0503-z. arXiv:1012.1312

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  2. [2]

    and Gaiotto, Davide and Tachikawa, Yuji

    Alday, Luis F. and Gaiotto, Davide and Tachikawa, Yuji. Liouville Correlation Functions from Four-dimensional Gauge Theories. Lett. Math. Phys. 2010. doi:10.1007/s11005-010-0369-5. arXiv:0906.3219

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  3. [3]

    Free fermions and tau-functions

    Alexandrov, Alexander and Zabrodin, Anton. Free fermions and tau-functions. J. Geom. Phys. 2013. doi:10.1016/j.geomphys.2013.01.007. arXiv:1212.6049

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  4. [4]

    Logarithmic Conformal Field Theory: Beyond an Introduction

    Creutzig, Thomas and Ridout, David. Logarithmic Conformal Field Theory: Beyond an Introduction. J. Phys. A. 2013. doi:10.1088/1751-8113/46/49/494006. arXiv:1303.0847

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  5. [5]

    A QFT for non-semisimple TQFT

    Creutzig, Thomas and Dimofte, Tudor and Garner, Niklas and Geer, Nathan. A QFT for non-semisimple TQFT. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2024. doi:10.4310/ATMP.2024.v28.n1.a4. arXiv:2112.01559

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    and Gainutdinov, Azat M

    Feigin, Boris L. and Gainutdinov, Azat M. and Semikhatov, Alexei M. and Tipunin, Ilya Yu. Logarithmic extensions of minimal models: characters and modular transformations. Nucl. Phys. B. 2006. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2006.09.019. arXiv:hep-th/0606196

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  7. [7]

    Representation of Lie groups and related topics , volume=

    Representations of the Virasoro algebra , author=. Representation of Lie groups and related topics , volume=. 1990 , publisher=

    1990

  8. [8]

    Gaudin Model, Bethe Ansatz and Critical Level

    Feigin, Boris and Frenkel, Edward and Reshetikhin, Nikolai. Gaudin Model, Bethe Ansatz and Critical Level. Commun. Math. Phys. 1994. doi:10.1007/BF02099300. arXiv:hep-th/9402022

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  9. [9]

    Opers on the projective line, flag manifolds and Bethe Ansatz

    Frenkel, Edward. Opers on the projective line, flag manifolds and Bethe Ansatz. Mosc. Math. J. 2004. arXiv:math/0308269

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  10. [10]

    and Tipunin, Ilya Yu

    Feigin, Boris L. and Tipunin, Ilya Yu. Logarithmic CFTs connected with simple Lie algebras. 2010. arXiv:1002.5047

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  11. [11]

    2012 , publisher=

    Conformal field theory , author=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  12. [12]

    and Iorgov, N

    Gamayun, O. and Iorgov, N. and Lisovyy, O. Conformal field theory of Painlev\'e VI. JHEP. 2012. doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2012)038. arXiv:1207.0787

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  13. [13]

    Gavrylenko, P. G. and Marshakov, A. V. Free fermions, W-algebras and isomonodromic deformations. Theor. Math. Phys. 2016. doi:10.1134/S0040577916050044. arXiv:1605.04554

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  14. [14]

    and Lisovyy, O

    Iorgov, N. and Lisovyy, O. and Teschner, J. Isomonodromic tau-functions from Liouville conformal blocks. Commun. Math. Phys. 2015. doi:10.1007/s00220-014-2245-0. arXiv:1401.6104

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  15. [15]

    and Miwa, T

    Jimbo, M. and Miwa, T. and Ueno, K. Monodromy preserving deformation of linear ordinary differential equations with rational coefficients: I. General theory and -function. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena. 1981. doi:10.1016/0167-2789(81)90013-0

    doi:10.1016/0167-2789(81)90013-0 1981

  16. [16]

    Knizhnik and A.B

    V.G. Knizhnik and A.B. Zamolodchikov. Current algebra and Wess-Zumino model in two dimensions. Nuclear Physics B. 1984. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(84)90374-2

    doi:10.1016/0550-3213(84)90374-2 1984

  17. [17]

    and Seiberg, Nathan

    Moore, Gregory W. and Seiberg, Nathan. Classical and Quantum Conformal Field Theory. Commun. Math. Phys. 1989. doi:10.1007/BF01238857

    doi:10.1007/bf01238857 1989

  18. [18]

    and Teschner, J

    Ponsot, B. and Teschner, J. Liouville bootstrap via harmonic analysis on a noncompact quantum group. 1999. arXiv:hep-th/9911110

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  19. [19]

    From Quantum Curves to Topological String Partition Functions II

    Coman, Ioana and Longhi, Pietro and Teschner, J. From Quantum Curves to Topological String Partition Functions II. Annales Henri Poincare. 2025. doi:10.1007/s00023-025-01538-2. arXiv:2004.04585

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    and Lisovyy, O

    Iorgov, N. and Lisovyy, O. and Tkhyy, Yu. Painlev \'e VI connection problem and monodromy of c=1 conformal blocks. JHEP. 2013. doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2013)029. arXiv:1308.4092

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  21. [21]

    On the Virasoro fusion kernel at c=25

    Ribault, Sylvain and Tsiares, Ioannis. On the Virasoro fusion kernel at c=25. SciPost Phys. 2024. doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.17.2.058. arXiv:2310.09334

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    On the Virasoro Crossing Kernels at Rational Central Charge

    Roussillon, Julien and Tsiares, Ioannis. On the Virasoro Crossing Kernels at Rational Central Charge. 2025. arXiv:2512.03172

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Studies on the Painlev \'e equations: I.-Sixth Painlev \'e equation PVI

    Okamoto, K. Studies on the Painlev \'e equations: I.-Sixth Painlev \'e equation PVI. Annali di Matematica pura ed applicata. 1986. doi:10.1007/BF01762370

    doi:10.1007/bf01762370 1986

  24. [24]

    Isomonodromic deformations of the sl (2) Fuchsian systems on the Riemann sphere

    Oblezin, Sergey. Isomonodromic deformations of the sl (2) Fuchsian systems on the Riemann sphere. Mosc. Math. J. 2005. doi:10.17323/1609-4514-2005-5-2-415-441. arXiv:math-ph/0309048

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  25. [25]

    Irregular conformal blocks, Painlev \'e III and the blow-up equations

    Gavrylenko, Pavlo and Marshakov, Andrei and Stoyan, Artem. Irregular conformal blocks, Painlev \'e III and the blow-up equations. JHEP. 2020. doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2020)125. arXiv:2006.15652

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  26. [26]

    Cluster integrable systems, q -Painlev \'e equations and their quantization

    Bershtein, Mikhail and Gavrylenko, Pavlo and Marshakov, Andrei. Cluster integrable systems, q -Painlev \'e equations and their quantization. JHEP. 2018. doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2018)077. arXiv:1711.02063

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  27. [27]

    Painlev \'e equations from Nakajima--Yoshioka blowup relations

    Bershtein, Mikhail and Shchechkin, Anton. Painlev \'e equations from Nakajima--Yoshioka blowup relations. Lett. Math. Phys. 2019. doi:10.1007/s11005-019-01198-4. arXiv:1811.04050

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  28. [28]

    and Shchechkin, Anton I

    Bershtein, Mikhail A. and Shchechkin, Anton I. Bilinear equations on Painlev \'e functions from CFT. Commun. Math. Phys. 2015. doi:10.1007/s00220-015-2427-4. arXiv:1406.3008

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  29. [29]

    Seiberg--Witten theory as a Fermi gas

    Bonelli, Giulio and Grassi, Alba and Tanzini, Alessandro. Seiberg--Witten theory as a Fermi gas. Lett. Math. Phys. 2017. doi:10.1007/s11005-016-0893-z. arXiv:1603.01174

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  30. [30]

    On Painlev \'e /gauge theory correspondence

    Bonelli, Giulio and Lisovyy, Oleg and Maruyoshi, Kazunobu and Sciarappa, Antonio and Tanzini, Alessandro. On Painlev \'e /gauge theory correspondence. Lett. Math. Phys. 2017. doi:10.1007/s11005-017-0983-6. arXiv:1612.06235

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  31. [31]

    and Shchechkin, Anton I

    Bershtein, Mikhail A. and Shchechkin, Anton I. q -deformed Painlev \'e function and q -deformed conformal blocks. J. Phys. A. 2017. doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aa5572. arXiv:1608.02566

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  32. [32]

    CFT approach to the q -Painlev \'e VI equation

    Jimbo, Michio and Nagoya, Hajime and Sakai, Hidetaka. CFT approach to the q -Painlev \'e VI equation. J. Integrable Syst. 2017. doi:10.1093/integr/xyx009. arXiv:1706.01940

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  33. [33]

    Fredholm determinant and Nekrasov sum representations of isomonodromic tau functions

    Gavrylenko, Pavlo and Lisovyy, Oleg. Fredholm determinant and Nekrasov sum representations of isomonodromic tau functions. Commun. Math. Phys. 2018. doi:10.1007/s00220-018-3224-7. arXiv:1608.00958

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  34. [34]

    Isomonodromic -functions and W_N conformal blocks

    Gavrylenko, Pavlo. Isomonodromic -functions and W_N conformal blocks. JHEP. 2015. doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2015)167. arXiv:1505.00259

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  35. [35]

    N =2^* gauge theory, free fermions on the torus and Painlev \'e VI

    Bonelli, Giulio and Del Monte, Fabrizio and Gavrylenko, Pavlo and Tanzini, Alessandro. N =2^* gauge theory, free fermions on the torus and Painlev \'e VI. Commun. Math. Phys. 2020. doi:10.1007/s00220-020-03743-y. arXiv:1901.10497

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  36. [36]

    The Liouville side of the Vortex

    Bonelli, Giulio and Tanzini, Alessandro and Zhao, Jian. The Liouville side of the Vortex. JHEP. 2011. doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2011)096. arXiv:1107.2787

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  37. [37]

    Lectures on Instanton Counting

    Nakajima, Hiraku and Yoshioka, Kota. Lectures on Instanton Counting. CRM Proc. Lecture Notes. 2004. doi:10.1090/crmp/038/02. arXiv:math/0311058

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  38. [38]

    Riemann--Hilbert correspondence and blown up surface defects

    Jeong, Saebyeok and Nekrasov, Nikita. Riemann--Hilbert correspondence and blown up surface defects. JHEP. 2020. doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2020)006. arXiv:2007.03660

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  39. [39]

    Blowups in BPS/CFT correspondence, and Painlev \'e VI

    Nekrasov, Nikita. Blowups in BPS/CFT correspondence, and Painlev \'e VI. Annales Henri Poincare. 2024. doi:10.1007/s00023-023-01301-5. arXiv:2007.03646

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    BPS/CFT correspondence: non-perturbative Dyson--Schwinger equations and qq -characters

    Nekrasov, Nikita. BPS/CFT correspondence: non-perturbative Dyson--Schwinger equations and qq -characters. JHEP. 2016. doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2016)181. arXiv:1512.05388

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  41. [41]

    BPS/CFT correspondence IV: sigma models and defects in gauge theory

    Nekrasov, Nikita. BPS/CFT correspondence IV: sigma models and defects in gauge theory. Lett. Math. Phys. 2019. doi:10.1007/s11005-018-1115-7. arXiv:1711.11011

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  42. [42]

    BPS/CFT correspondence V: BPZ and KZ equations from qq -characters

    Nekrasov, Nikita. BPS/CFT correspondence V: BPZ and KZ equations from qq -characters. 2017. arXiv:1711.11582

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  43. [43]

    Surface defects in gauge theory and KZ equation

    Nekrasov, Nikita and Tsymbaliuk, Alexander. Surface defects in gauge theory and KZ equation. Lett. Math. Phys. 2022. doi:10.1007/s11005-022-01511-8. arXiv:2103.12611

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  44. [44]

    Parallel surface defects, Hecke operators, and quantum Hitchin system

    Jeong, Saebyeok and Lee, Norton and Nekrasov, Nikita. Parallel surface defects, Hecke operators, and quantum Hitchin system. Commun. Math. Phys. 2026. doi:10.1007/s00220-026-05603-7. arXiv:2304.04656

    arXiv 2026

  45. [45]

    Poincar \'e polynomial of moduli spaces of framed sheaves on (stacky) Hirzebruch surfaces

    Bruzzo, Ugo and Poghossian, Rubik and Tanzini, Alessandro. Poincar \'e polynomial of moduli spaces of framed sheaves on (stacky) Hirzebruch surfaces. Commun. Math. Phys. 2011. doi:10.1007/s00220-011-1231-z. arXiv:0909.1458

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  46. [46]

    Highest-weight vectors and three-point functions in GKO coset decomposition

    Bershtein, Mikhail and Feigin, Boris and Trufanov, Aleksandr. Highest-weight vectors and three-point functions in GKO coset decomposition. Commun. Math. Phys. 2025. doi:10.1007/s00220-025-05318-1. arXiv:2404.14350

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  47. [47]

    Refined Painlev \'e /gauge theory correspondence and quantum tau functions

    Bonelli, Giulio and Shchechkin, Anton and Tanzini, Alessandro. Refined Painlev \'e /gauge theory correspondence and quantum tau functions. Annales Henri Poincare. 2025. doi:10.1007/s00023-025-01621-8. arXiv:2502.01499

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    2022 , month = jun, doi =

    Teschner, Joerg , title = ". 2022 , month = jun, doi =

    2022

  49. [49]

    Ferrari, Andrea and Lentner, Simon and Teschner, J

  50. [50]

    A Lecture on the Liouville vertex operators

    Teschner, J. A Lecture on the Liouville vertex operators. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A. 2004. doi:10.1142/S0217751X04020567. arXiv:hep-th/0303150

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004