Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 157 references

This paper claims that measuring neutron-star radii to about 0.2 km precision extracts most of the information available for identifying twin neutron stars, with further improvements yielding diminishing returns.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 15:55 UTC pith:EKHESDH7

load-bearing objection The 0.2-km saturation benchmark is contradicted by the paper's own entropy and distinguishability numbers, but the framework is a useful step toward planning radius-precision requirements. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.18124 v1 pith:EKHESDH7 submitted 2026-07-20 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.GAastro-ph.SRnucl-exnucl-th

Quantifying the Information Gain from Future High-Precision Radius Measurements for Identifying Twin Neutron Stars

Bao-An Li , Xavier Grundler This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HE astro-ph.GAastro-ph.SRnucl-exnucl-th
keywords twin neutron starsradius measurementsBayesian inferenceinformation gainfirst-order phase transitionmass-radius relationShannon entropyobservational precision
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper asks how precise neutron-star radius measurements must be to identify twin stars—pairs of stars with the same mass but different radii, a signature of a strong first-order phase transition inside supradense matter. Using mock radius data with uncertainties from 0.9 km down to 0.1 km, the authors run Bayesian inference and find three regimes: above 0.6 km the posterior is prior-dominated, between 0.2 and 0.6 km information is gained most rapidly, and below 0.2 km the posterior saturates. They conclude that about 0.2 km precision is sufficient to extract most of the available information, a quantitative benchmark for designing future X-ray and gravitational-wave missions.

Core claim

Within the paper's Bayesian framework, the posterior distribution of the maximum twin-star radius separation ΔR narrows most rapidly as the assumed radius uncertainty σ_R decreases from 0.6 km to 0.2 km, and essentially stops narrowing below 0.2 km. This three-regime structure—prior-dominated, rapid-gain, and information-saturation—is reproduced by an analytical model where the probability of statistically resolving the two mass-radius branches is Φ(ΔR/(2σ_R)), and by complementary measures based on branch observational efficiency and Shannon entropy. The paper therefore claims that radius measurements with precision around 0.2 km are sufficient to identify twin neutron stars, and that furth

What carries the argument

The central object is the ratio ΔR/(2σ_R), the intrinsic twin-star radius separation divided by twice the observational uncertainty. The analytical distinguishability probability P_dis = Φ(ΔR/(2σ_R))—the Gaussian cumulative probability that an observed radius is assigned to the correct branch—governs branch resolvability and saturates near unity when the ratio exceeds about 2. The Bayesian inference uses a nine-parameter meta-model equation of state with a uniform prior on the hadron-quark transition density over (1–6)ρ₀, and the posterior distribution of ΔR is combined with P_dis into an observational efficiency integral and the Shannon entropy of the posterior.

Load-bearing premise

The 0.2-km benchmark is computed inside the paper's own Bayesian framework—a nine-parameter meta-model equation of state and a uniform prior on the hadron-quark transition density over (1–6)ρ₀—so if the true equation of state or prior lies outside this family, the saturation threshold could shift.

What would settle it

A concrete test: re-run the identical Bayesian inference using a different equation-of-state meta-model (for example, a speed-of-sound parameterization) or a wider prior on the transition density, and check whether the posterior mean of ΔR still flattens at σ_R ≈ 0.2 km; a continued steep decline below 0.2 km would falsify the claimed saturation threshold as a general result.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the benchmark holds, future missions aiming for ~0.2 km radius precision will capture most of the twin-star information; designs targeting 0.1 km add little.
  • The three-regime decomposition gives a rule of thumb for when a measurement campaign transitions from prior-dominated to likelihood-dominated.
  • The analytical distinguishability formula can be used to quickly estimate twin-star observability from any predicted ΔR and assumed σ_R.
  • The framework extends to other questions where progressively precise observations constrain a parameter, identifying the point of diminishing returns.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the 0.2-km threshold is likely sensitive to the chosen equation-of-state parameterization and the prior on the transition density; a different generative model could shift the saturation point, so the benchmark should be re-checked with alternative meta-models.
  • Editorial inference: the same distinguishability logic applies to other binary-branch problems in astrophysics, such as separating hadronic and hybrid branches in mass-tidal-deformability space, where the dimensionless ratio of separation to uncertainty plays the same role.
  • Editorial inference: a testable extension is to run the same analysis with a prior that includes transition densities above 6ρ₀ or with a speed-of-sound parameterization, and check whether the 0.2-km saturation persists.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. This Letter uses Bayesian inference with mock radius measurements of a canonical 1.4 solar-mass neutron star to quantify how the precision of future radius observations would improve our ability to identify twin neutron stars. The radius uncertainty is varied from 0.9 km to 0.1 km. The paper analyzes the posterior distribution of the maximum radius separation ΔR, an analytical Gaussian branch-distinguishability probability, a branch observational efficiency, and the Shannon entropy of the posterior. It identifies three regimes: a prior-dominated regime for σ_R ≳ 0.6 km, a rapid information-gain regime for 0.2 ≲ σ_R ≲ 0.6 km, and an information-saturation regime for σ_R ≲ 0.2 km, concluding that 0.2-km precision already extracts most of the available information for identifying twin NSs within the adopted Bayesian framework and EOS meta-model.

Significance. If the 0.2-km saturation claim were sound, the paper would provide a useful quantitative benchmark for planning next-generation X-ray timing and gravitational-wave observatories, and the proposed framework for measuring information gain as a function of observational precision would be of general methodological value. The paper is clearly written, uses a published Bayesian EOS meta-model, and supplies an analytical distinguishability formula (Eq. 1) that is independently checkable. However, the central quantitative claim is contradicted by the paper's own reported information-theoretic and distinguishability metrics, so the significance of the benchmark is currently not established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2.3, Fig. 5, and Eq. (1)] The paper's own metrics contradict the claimed 'information-saturation regime for σ_R ≲ 0.2 km'. Section 2.3 explicitly states that the Shannon entropy 'increases most rapidly between σ_R = 0.1 and 0.2 km', meaning that the entropy drop—and hence the information gain—when improving from 0.2 km to 0.1 km is the largest in the plotted range. This is the opposite of saturation. Similarly, Eq. (1) gives P_dis = Φ(1.25) ≈ 0.89 for ΔR = 0.5 km at σ_R = 0.2 km, but P_dis = Φ(2.5) ≈ 0.994 at σ_R = 0.1 km; the remaining misclassification probability drops by more than an order of magnitude. Thus the abstract's 'most of the information ... is acquired before ... 0.2 km' is not supported by the paper's own quantitative measures.
  2. [Section 2 opening and Summary] The 0.2-km threshold is computed within a single EOS meta-model (Zhang et al. 2018; Xie & Li 2020, 2021) with a uniform prior on the hadron–quark transition density over (1–6)ρ_0. The paper acknowledges this caveat ('within the present Bayesian framework'), but then generalizes: 'the existence of an information-saturation regime is expected to be a generic consequence of Bayesian inference.' No robustness test is provided—e.g., varying the meta-model parameterization, the transition-density prior, or the mock central radius. Because the central claim is intended as an observational benchmark, the model-dependence of the threshold should be quantified or the generalization softened.
  3. [Section 2.1] The claim that 'most of the posterior narrowing occurs when the observational precision increases from σ_R = 0.9 km to about 0.2 km, whereas further reductions to 0.1 km produce only modest changes' is not supported by any plotted or tabulated measure of posterior width or variance. Moreover, the Shannon entropy behavior reported in Section 2.3 suggests that the posterior continues to narrow substantially below 0.2 km. If the authors intend a narrower meaning of 'narrowing' (e.g., of the posterior mean only), this should be stated explicitly and quantified; otherwise the statement appears inconsistent with the paper's own entropy analysis.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Section 3] The phrase 'These complementary analyses consistently indicate' is inaccurate given the entropy behavior described in Section 2.3; at minimum, the abstract should be reworded to reflect the actual consistency (or lack thereof) among the adopted information measures.
  2. [Section 2.2] The text says that for ΔR/(2σ_R) ≳ 2 the branches are 'nearly completely' resolved, and that P_dis = 0.89 at σ_R = 0.2 km is 'close to the saturation region'. Since the saturation region is defined by ratios ≳2, a ratio of 1.25 (P_dis = 0.89) is not close to saturation under the paper's own definition. This wording should be revised.
  3. [Table 1] The fraction of twin-producing EOSs among accepted EOSs is roughly constant across σ_R (14.75%, 13.30%, 10.86%, 14.04%). The paper should clarify whether the 'information gain' refers only to the conditional distribution of ΔR given twin-producing EOSs, rather than to the posterior probability of the twin hypothesis itself; otherwise the reader may expect this fraction to respond to measurement precision.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Partial circularity: the 0.2-km saturation benchmark leans on same-group citations; the paper's own entropy and P_dis curves also tension the claim.

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Section 2.2, final paragraph]
    "once σ_R ≲0.2 km, not only the posterior distribution of ΔR but also those of all nine EOS parameters exhibit only weak additional evolution as the observational precision is further improved Li et al. (2024a); Grundler and Li (2025); Li et al. (2026)."

    The central saturation threshold is argued to follow from the saturation of all nine EOS parameters, and that saturation is justified by citing three prior papers from the same group (Li, Grundler, Zhang, Xie). Those papers use the same meta-model EOS and the same Bayesian priors, so they are not independent, machine-checked, or externally falsified support for the present conclusion. The current paper's own Fig. 3 provides some independent evidence, so the circularity is partial rather than total; still, a load-bearing part of the derivation chain reduces to a self-citation chain.

full rationale

The analytical distinguishability model (Eqs. 1-5) is textbook Gaussian classification and is externally grounded; no circularity is found there. The Bayesian posterior analysis is an explicitly stated mock-data exercise with the prior and meta-model disclosed, and the 0.2-km conclusion is repeatedly qualified as 'within the present Bayesian framework'. The main circularity concern is the self-citation chain supporting the saturation: the paper invokes Li et al. (2024a), Grundler & Li (2025), and Li et al. (2026) to assert that the EOS-parameter posteriors have saturated below 0.2 km, and uses that to explain the central benchmark. These are same-author, same-framework papers, not independent external evidence. Because Fig. 3 of the present paper independently shows a flattening of the posterior mean, the self-citation is load-bearing but not the sole basis, so a score of 4 is appropriate rather than 6 or higher. Separately, and as a correctness concern rather than a circularity, Section 2.3 states that the Shannon entropy 'increases most rapidly between σ_R=0.1 and 0.2 km'. Since entropy quantifies residual posterior uncertainty, this means the largest information gain occurs when precision improves from 0.2 to 0.1 km, which contradicts the Summary's 'information-saturation regime for σ_R≲0.2 km'. Similarly, Eq. (1) with ΔR≈0.5 km gives P_dis≈0.89 at σ_R=0.2 km versus ≈0.994 at 0.1 km, so the misclassification rate drops by more than an order of magnitude. Those internal inconsistencies weaken the quantitative benchmark but are not a reduction of a prediction to its inputs, so they are flagged here rather than counted as an additional circular step.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. The free parameters are the mock data central value, the transition-density prior, and the inherited EOS meta-model parameters. The axioms are mostly domain assumptions about the EOS model family and Gaussian measurement errors, plus a hand-set prior. The most fragile premise is the inherited self-cited saturation claim that anchors the 0.2-km threshold.

free parameters (3)
  • Mock NS radius central value R_1.4 = 11.9 km
    Chosen by hand as the true radius for the mock 1.4 M_sun measurement; the inferred ΔR posteriors and saturation threshold depend on this central value.
  • Transition density prior range = 1-6 rho_0 (uniform)
    Prior on the hadron-quark transition density adopted from earlier work; the information content is measured relative to this prior.
  • Nine EOS meta-model parameters = Not specified in this paper
    The nine parameters of the meta-model EOS are constrained by earlier Bayesian analyses; this paper reuses those posteriors as its effective prior, so the central result inherits their fitted values.
axioms (5)
  • standard math Standard probability and information-theory identities (Bayes' rule, Gaussian CDF, Shannon entropy) are valid.
    Used throughout Sections 2.2-2.4 without proof; standard textbook results.
  • domain assumption Radius measurement errors are Gaussian with known variance σ_R.
    Section 2.2 assumes R_1 ~ N(μ_1, σ_R), R_2 ~ N(μ_2, σ_R) and the Bayesian likelihood uses Gaussian mock data.
  • domain assumption The EOS meta-model of Zhang et al. (2018) and Xie & Li (2020, 2021) spans the relevant space of supradense matter.
    The paper's central conclusion is conditional on this model family; no comparison to alternative parameterizations is made.
  • ad hoc to paper Uniform prior on the hadron-quark transition density over (1-6)ρ_0.
    A hand-set prior inherited from earlier same-group work; it is not derived from independent data and directly shapes the posterior saturation behavior.
  • ad hoc to paper Posterior saturation below σ_R ≈ 0.2 km, cited from Li et al. (2024a), Grundler & Li (2025), and Li et al. (2026), is correct and transferable to the ΔR posterior.
    The paper relies on earlier self-cited results to explain why the ΔR posterior saturates; this is a load-bearing premise rather than a result demonstrated with new external data.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 10638 in / 14208 out tokens · 135163 ms · 2026-08-01T15:55:33.736038+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Twin neutron stars (NSs), characterized by identical gravitational masses but different radii, are among the most promising astrophysical signatures of a strong first-order hadron--quark phase transition in supradense matter. We investigate how increasingly precise NS radius measurements improve the Bayesian inference of twin-star observability using mock radius data for a canonical $1.4\,M_\odot$ NS. Radius uncertainties are varied from the current level of about $0.9$ km to the $\approx 0.1$ km precision anticipated from future X-ray and gravitational-wave observations. We quantify the information gained using the posterior distribution of the maximum twin-star radius separation $\Delta R$ together with an analytical model of branch distinguishability and complementary information-theoretic measures based on the branch observational efficiency and the Shannon entropy. The combined analyses reveal three inference regimes: a prior-dominated regime for $\sigma_R \gtrsim 0.6$ km, a rapid information-gain regime for $0.2 \lesssim \sigma_R \lesssim 0.6$ km, and an information-saturation regime for $\sigma_R \lesssim 0.2$ km. These complementary analyses consistently indicate that radius measurements with a precision of about $0.2$ km already extract most of the information available for identifying twin NSs within the present Bayesian framework. Beyond establishing a quantitative observational benchmark for future high-precision radius measurements, this work provides a general Bayesian framework for quantifying the information gain from progressively more precise observations and identifying the point of diminishing scientific returns.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.18124 by Bao-An Li, Xavier Grundler.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Modified from plots in Refs. Alford et al. (2013); Zhang and Li [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Posterior probability distributions of ∆R and ∆M for Both (left) and Disconnected (right) categories from Bayesian inference using the mock radius data of R1.4 = 11.9 ± σR km data with σR = 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 0.9 km, respectively. 0. 0 0. 1 0. 2 0. 3 0. 4 0. 5 0. 6 0. 7 0. 8 0. 9 1 . 0 1 . 1 2 1 . 1 4 1 . 1 6 1 . 1 8 1 . 20 1 . 22 1 . 24 Both category M e a n o f ∆ R ( k m ) σR (km) Maximum twi n star separati… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Posterior mean of the maximum radius separation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The branch distinguishability probability [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Normalized Shannon entropy, S/S (σR = 0.1) (black, left axis), and normalized branch observational efficiency, η/η(σR = 0.1) (blue, right axis), as functions of the assumed radius uncertainty σR for the Both category [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

157 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2015, , 579, A101

    Aladro, R., Martín, S., Riquelme, D., et al. 2015, , 579, A101

    2015

  2. [2]

    doi:10.1086/148791 , adsurl =

    A Catalogue of Methods for Studying the Normal Modes of Radial Pulsation of General-Relativistic Stellar Models , journal =. doi:10.1086/148791 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1086/148791

  3. [3]

    Perturbative QCD and the neutron star equation of state

    Somasundaram, Rahul and Tews, Ingo and Margueron, J \'e r \^o me. Perturbative QCD and the neutron star equation of state. Phys. Rev. C. 2023. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.107.L052801. arXiv:2204.14039

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    Aboona, B. E. and others. Onset of Constituent Quark Number Scaling in Heavy-Ion Collisions at RHIC. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2025. doi:10.1103/2qhx-cp79. arXiv:2504.02531

    arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    2025 , note =

    Pavlo Panasiuk , title =. 2025 , note =

    2025

  6. [6]

    Reexamining constraints on neutron star properties from perturbative QCD

    Zhou, Dake. Reexamining constraints on neutron star properties from perturbative QCD. Phys. Rev. C. 2025. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.111.015810. arXiv:2307.11125

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    and Harris, Steven P

    Alford, Mark G. and Harris, Steven P. and Sachdeva, Pratik S. , title =. 2017 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa8509 , url =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa8509 2017

  8. [8]

    The Stability of a Star with a Phase Change in General Relativity Theory , journal =

  9. [10]

    Hastings, W. K. , title =. Biometrika , volume =. 1970 , month =. doi:10.1093/biomet/57.1.97 , url =

    doi:10.1093/biomet/57.1.97 1970

  10. [11]

    doi:10.1063/1.1699114 , adsurl =

    Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines , journal =. doi:10.1063/1.1699114 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1063/1.1699114

  11. [12]

    PASP , year = 2013, volume = 125, pages =

    emcee:. PASP , year = 2013, volume = 125, pages =. 1202.3665 , doi =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  12. [13]

    2017 , publisher=

    Abbott, Benjamin P and Abbott, Rich and Abbott, TDea and Acernese, Fausto and Ackley, Kendall and Adams, Carl and Adams, Thomas and Addesso, Paolo and Adhikari, RX and Adya, Vaishali B and others , journal=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  13. [14]

    Physical Review C , volume=

    Asymmetric nuclear matter equation of state , author=. Physical Review C , volume=. 1991 , doi =

    1991

  14. [15]

    Physical Review , volume=

    On massive neutron cores , author=. Physical Review , volume=. 1939 , publisher=

    1939

  15. [16]

    and Han, Sophia and Prakash, Madappa

    Alford, Mark G. and Han, Sophia and Prakash, Madappa. Generic conditions for stable hybrid stars. Phys. Rev. D. 2013. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.083013. arXiv:1302.4732

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  16. [17]

    Nuclear Physics A , volume=

    Neutron star matter at sub-nuclear densities , author=. Nuclear Physics A , volume=. 1973 , publisher=

    1973

  17. [18]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    The ground state of matter at high densities: equation of state and stellar models , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 1971 , publisher=

    1971

  18. [19]

    2025 , month =

    Li, Jia Jie and Sedrakian, Armen and Alford, Mark , title =. 2025 , month =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/02/002 , url =

    doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/02/002 2025

  19. [20]

    Classifications of Twin Star Solutions for a Constant Speed of Sound Parameterized Equation of State

    Christian, Jan-Erik and Zacchi, Andreas and Schaffner-Bielich, J. Classifications of Twin Star Solutions for a Constant Speed of Sound Parameterized Equation of State. Eur. Phys. J. A. 2018. doi:10.1140/epja/i2018-12472-y. arXiv:1707.07524

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  20. [21]

    Impact of the nuclear equation of state on the formation of twin stars

    Zhang, Nai-Bo and Li, Bao-An. Impact of the nuclear equation of state on the formation of twin stars. Eur. Phys. J. A. 2025. doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-025-01497-6. arXiv:2406.07396

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  21. [22]

    Bayesian inference of the dense-matter equation of state encapsulating a first-order hadron-quark phase transition from observables of canonical neutron stars , author =. Phys. Rev. C , volume =. 2021 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.103.035802 , url =

    doi:10.1103/physrevc.103.035802 2021

  22. [23]

    Progress in Constraining Nuclear Symmetry Energy Using Neutron Star Observables Since GW170817

    Li, Bao-An and Cai, Bao-Jun and Xie, Wen-Jie and Zhang, Nai-Bo. Progress in Constraining Nuclear Symmetry Energy Using Neutron Star Observables Since GW170817. Universe. 2021. doi:10.3390/universe7060182. arXiv:2105.04629

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  23. [24]

    and Albataineh, H

    Adhikari, D. and Albataineh, H. and Androic, D. and Aniol, K. and Armstrong, D. S. and Averett, T. and Ayerbe Gayoso, C. and Barcus, S. and Bellini, V. and Beminiwattha, R. S. and Benesch, J. F. and Bhatt, H. and Bhatta Pathak, D. and Bhetuwal, D. and Blaikie, B. and Campagna, Q. and Camsonne, A. and Cates, G. D. and Chen, Y. and Clarke, C. and Cornejo, J...

    2021

  24. [25]

    and Fattoyev, F

    Reed, Brendan T. and Fattoyev, F. J. and Horowitz, C. J. and Piekarewicz, J. , journal =. Implications of. 2021 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.172503 , url =

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.172503 2021

  25. [26]

    Abbott, R. et al. for the LIGO and Virgo Collaborations , title =. 2020 , month =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab960f , url =

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab960f 2020

  26. [27]

    Abdallah and B.E

    M.S. Abdallah and B.E. Aboona and J. Adam and L. Adamczyk and J.R. Adams and J.K. Adkins and G. Agakishiev and I. Aggarwal and M.M. Aggarwal and Z. Ahammed and I. Alekseev and D.M. Anderson and A. Aparin and E.C. Aschenauer and M.U. Ashraf and F.G. Atetalla and A. Attri and G.S. Averichev and V. Bairathi and W. Baker and J.G. Probing strangeness canonical...

    arXiv 2022

  27. [28]

    Abdallah and B.E

    M.S. Abdallah and B.E. Aboona and J. Adam and L. Adamczyk and J.R. Adams and J.K. Adkins and G. Agakishiev and I. Aggarwal and M.M. Aggarwal and Z. Ahammed and I. Alekseev and D.M. Anderson and A. Aparin and E.C. Aschenauer and M.U. Ashraf and F.G. Atetalla and A. Attri and G.S. Averichev and V. Bairathi and W. Baker and J.G. Disappearance of partonic col...

    arXiv 2022

  28. [29]

    Abdallah, M. S. and Aboona, B. E. and Adam, J. and Adamczyk, L. and Adams, J. R. and Adkins, J. K. and Agakishiev, G. and Aggarwal, I. and Aggarwal, M. M. and Ahammed, Z. and Alekseev, I. and Anderson, D. M. and Aparin, A. and Aschenauer, E. C. and Ashraf, M. U. and Atetalla, F. G. and Attri, A. and Averichev, G. S. and Bairathi, V. and Baker, W. and Ball...

    2022

  29. [30]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Hidden Twin Star Solutions from an Agnostic Speed-of-Sound Model:. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2504.08662 , archivePrefix =. 2504.08662 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.08662

  30. [31]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    Combined constraints on the equation of state of dense neutron-rich matter from terrestrial nuclear experiments and observations of neutron stars , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  31. [32]

    Implications of the Mass

    Zhang, Nai-Bo and Li, Bao-An. Implications of the Mass. Astrophys. J. 2019. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab24cb. arXiv:1904.10998

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  32. [33]

    Impact of

    Zhang, Nai-Bo and Li, Bao-An. Impact of. Astrophys. J. 2021. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac1e8c. arXiv:2105.11031

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  33. [34]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    Bayesian inference of high-density nuclear symmetry energy from radii of canonical neutron stars , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  34. [35]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    Bayesian inference of the symmetry energy of superdense neutron-rich matter from future radius measurements of massive neutron stars , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  35. [36]

    Bayesian inference of the dense-matter equation of state encapsulating a first-order hadron-quark phase transition from observables of canonical neutron stars

    Xie, Wen-Jie and Li, Bao-An. Bayesian inference of the dense-matter equation of state encapsulating a first-order hadron-quark phase transition from observables of canonical neutron stars. Phys. Rev. C. 2021. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.103.035802. arXiv:2009.13653

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  36. [37]

    Properties of first-order hadron-quark phase transition from inverting neutron star observables

    Zhang, Nai-Bo and Li, Bao-An. Properties of first-order hadron-quark phase transition from inverting neutron star observables. Phys. Rev. C. 2023. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.108.025803. arXiv:2304.07381

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  37. [38]

    Bayesian Inference of Hybrid Star Properties from Future High-precision Measurements of Their Radii

    Li, Bao-An and Grundler, Xavier and Xie, Wen-Jie and Zhang, Nai-Bo. Bayesian Inference of Hybrid Star Properties from Future High-precision Measurements of Their Radii. Astrophys. J. 2026. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae38c0. arXiv:2505.00194

    arXiv 2026

  38. [39]

    Impact of the newly revised gravitational redshift of x-ray burster GS 1826-24 on the equation of state of supradense neutron-rich matter

    Xie, Wen-Jie and Li, Bao-An and Zhang, Nai-Bo. Impact of the newly revised gravitational redshift of x-ray burster GS 1826-24 on the equation of state of supradense neutron-rich matter. Phys. Rev. D. 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.043025. arXiv:2404.01989

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  39. [40]

    Bayesian inference of fine features of the nuclear equation of state from future neutron star radius measurements to 0.1 km accuracy

    Li, Bao-An and Grundler, Xavier and Xie, Wen-Jie and Zhang, Nai-Bo. Bayesian inference of fine features of the nuclear equation of state from future neutron star radius measurements to 0.1 km accuracy. Phys. Rev. D. 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.103040. arXiv:2407.07823

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  40. [41]

    Abbott, B. P. and others. GW170817: Measurements of neutron star radii and equation of state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.161101. arXiv:1805.11581

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  41. [42]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=

    Effect of inhomogeneity on cosmological models , author=. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=. 1934 , publisher=

    1934

  42. [43]

    , journal =

    Tolman, Richard C. , journal =. Static Solutions of. 1939 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.55.364 , url =

    doi:10.1103/physrev.55.364 1939

  43. [44]

    Which first order phase transitions to quark matter are possible in neutron stars? , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2024 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.063035 , url =

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.063035 2024

  44. [45]

    and others

    Abbott, R. and others. GW190814: Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 23 Solar Mass Black Hole with a 2.6 Solar Mass Compact Object. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2020. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab960f. arXiv:2006.12611

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  45. [46]

    Ranking Love Numbers for the Neutron Star Equation of State:

    Pacilio, Costantino and Maselli, Andrea and Fasano, Margherita and Pani, Paolo. Ranking Love Numbers for the Neutron Star Equation of State:. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.101101. arXiv:2104.10035

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  46. [47]

    urgen , title =

    Mendes, Melissa and Christian, Jan-Erik and Fattoyev, Farrukh J. and Schaffner-Bielich, J\"urgen , title = ". Phys. Rev. D. 2025. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.063007. arXiv:2408.05287

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  47. [48]

    Hybrid stars with large quark cores within the parity doublet model and modified NJL model

    Yuan, Wen-Li and Gao, Bikai and Yan, Yan and Xu, Renxin. Hybrid stars with large quark cores within the parity doublet model and modified NJL model. Phys. Rev. D. 2025. doi:10.1103/nlhh-xqjp. arXiv:2502.17859

    arXiv 2025

  48. [49]

    Probing the high-density nuclear symmetry energy with the ^- / ^0 ratio in heavy-ion collisions at s_ NN 3 GeV

    Yong, Gao-Chan and Li, Bao-An and Xiao, Zhi-Gang and Lin, Zi-Wei. Probing the high-density nuclear symmetry energy with the ^- / ^0 ratio in heavy-ion collisions at s_ NN 3 GeV. Phys. Rev. C. 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.106.024902. arXiv:2206.10766

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  49. [50]

    and Fattoyev, F

    Reed, Brendan T. and Fattoyev, F. J. and Horowitz, C. J. and Piekarewicz, J. , journal =. Density dependence of the symmetry energy in the. 2024 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.109.035803 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.109.035803 2024

  50. [51]

    Searching for New Physics in an Ultradense Environment:

    Grippa, Francesco and Lambiase, Gaetano and Poddar, Tanmay Kumar , year=. Searching for New Physics in an Ultradense Environment:. Universe , publisher=. doi:10.3390/universe11030074 , number=

    doi:10.3390/universe11030074

  51. [52]

    Dark matter admixed neutron stars , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2021 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.043009 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.043009 2021

  52. [53]

    and Issifu, Adamu , year=

    Lopes, Luiz L. and Issifu, Adamu , year=. doi:10.1016/j.dark.2025.101922 , journal=

    arXiv 2025

  53. [54]

    Emergence of new oscillation modes in dark matter admixed neutron stars , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2025 , month =. doi:10.1103/kcl2-qgxh , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/kcl2-qgxh 2025

  54. [55]

    10.1051/0004-6361/201220697

    Maximum mass of neutron stars and strange neutron-star cores , DOI= "10.1051/0004-6361/201220697", url= "https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201220697", journal =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201220697

  55. [56]

    Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics , keywords =

    Merging strangeon stars. Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1674-4527/18/2/24 , archivePrefix =. 1710.04964 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  56. [57]

    Constraints on interquark interaction parameters with

    Zhou, En-Ping and Zhou, Xia and Li, Ang , journal =. Constraints on interquark interaction parameters with. 2018 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.083015 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.083015 2018

  57. [58]

    Sound velocity in dense stellar matter with strangeness and compact stars , volume=

    Xia, Chengjun and Zhu, Zhenyu and Zhou, Xia and Li, Ang , year=. Sound velocity in dense stellar matter with strangeness and compact stars , volume=. Chinese Physics C , publisher=. doi:10.1088/1674-1137/abea0d , number=

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-1137/abea0d

  58. [59]

    Constraining Hadron-quark Phase Transition Parameters within the Quark-mean-field Model Using Multimessenger Observations of Neutron Stars , volume=

    Miao, Zhiqiang and Li, Ang and Zhu, Zhenyu and Han, Sophia , year=. Constraining Hadron-quark Phase Transition Parameters within the Quark-mean-field Model Using Multimessenger Observations of Neutron Stars , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal , publisher=. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abbd41 , number=

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abbd41

  59. [60]

    Confirming the Existence of Twin Stars in a

    Christian, Jan-Erik and Schaffner-Bielich, Jürgen , year=. Confirming the Existence of Twin Stars in a. The Astrophysical Journal , publisher=. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac75cf , number=

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac75cf

  60. [61]

    Ultracompact hybrid stars consistent with multimessenger astrophysics

    Li, Jia Jie and Sedrakian, Armen and Alford, Mark. Ultracompact hybrid stars consistent with multimessenger astrophysics. Phys. Rev. D. 2023. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.023018. arXiv:2207.09798

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  61. [62]

    Astrophysical Journal , keywords =

    Comparison of Equations of State for Neutron Stars with First-order Phase Transitions:. Astrophysical Journal , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adcee0 , archivePrefix =. 2501.06453 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  62. [63]

    Astrophysical Journal , keywords =

    Is the Central Compact Object in. Astrophysical Journal , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adbc6b , archivePrefix =. 2504.02945 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  63. [64]

    Properties of the Object HESS J1731-347 as a Twin Compact Star

    Alvarez-Castillo, David E. Properties of the Object HESS J1731-347 as a Twin Compact Star. Universe. 2025. doi:10.3390/universe11070224. arXiv:2504.00240

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  64. [65]

    Twin Stars and the Stiffness of the Nuclear Equation of State:

    Christian, Jan-Erik and Schaffner-Bielich, Jürgen , year=. Twin Stars and the Stiffness of the Nuclear Equation of State:. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , publisher=. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab8af4 , number=

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab8af4 2041

  65. [66]

    XTE J1814-338: A potential hybrid star candidate , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2025 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.063058 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.063058 2025

  66. [67]

    Comprehensive analysis of constructing hybrid stars with a renormalization group-consistent Nambu-Jona-Lasino model

    Christian, Jan-Erik and Rather, Ishfaq Ahmad and Gholami, Hosein and Hofmann, Marco. Comprehensive analysis of constructing hybrid stars with a renormalization group-consistent Nambu-Jona-Lasino model. Astron. Astrophys. 2025. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555009. arXiv:2503.13626

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  67. [68]

    and Koliogiannis, P

    Laskos-Patkos, P. and Koliogiannis, P. S. and Moustakidis, Ch. C. , journal =. Hybrid stars in light of the HESS J1731-347 remnant and the PREX-II experiment. 2024 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.063017 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.063017 2024

  68. [69]

    Constraining twin stars with GW170817

    Montana, Gloria and Tolos, Laura and Hanauske, Matthias and Rezzolla, Luciano. Constraining twin stars with GW170817. Phys. Rev. D. 2019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.103009. arXiv:1811.10929

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  69. [70]

    Astrophysical Journal , keywords =

    Constraining First-order Phase Transition inside Neutron Stars with Application of Bayesian Techniques on. Astrophysical Journal , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adbb67 , archivePrefix =. 2502.11976 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  70. [71]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aceefb , archivePrefix =

    Constraints on Strong Phase Transitions in Neutron Stars , journal =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aceefb , archivePrefix =. 2212.10576 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  71. [72]

    Hybrid star properties with the NJL and mean field approximation of QCD models: A Bayesian approach

    Albino, Milena and Malik, Tuhin and Ferreira, M\'arcio and Provid\^encia, Constan c a. Hybrid star properties with the NJL and mean field approximation of QCD models: A Bayesian approach. Phys. Rev. D. 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.083037. arXiv:2406.15337

    arXiv 2024

  72. [73]

    Hybrid Star Models in the Light of New Multimessenger Data , volume=

    Li, Jia Jie and Sedrakian, Armen and Alford, Mark , year=. Hybrid Star Models in the Light of New Multimessenger Data , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal , publisher=. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad4295 , number=

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad4295

  73. [74]

    and Ayriyan, A

    Alvarez-Castillo, D. and Ayriyan, A. and Benic, S. and Blaschke, D. and Grigorian, H. and Typel, S. New class of hybrid EoS and Bayesian M-R data analysis. Eur. Phys. J. A. 2016. doi:10.1140/epja/i2016-16069-2. arXiv:1603.03457

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  74. [75]

    Zdunik, J. L. and Bejger, M. and Haensel, P. and Gourgoulhon, E. , year=. Phase transitions in rotating neutron stars cores: back bending, stability, corequakes, and pulsar timing , volume=. Astronomy & Astrophysics , publisher=. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20054260 , number=

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20054260

  75. [76]

    Equation of State at Supranuclear Densities and the Existence of a Third Family of Superdense Stars , author =. Phys. Rev. , volume =. 1968 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.172.1325 , url =

    doi:10.1103/physrev.172.1325 1968

  76. [77]

    On the Possibility of Stable Quark and Pion Condensed Stars

    Kampfer, Burkhard. On the Possibility of Stable Quark and Pion Condensed Stars. J. Phys. A. 1981. doi:10.1088/0305-4470/14/11/009

    work page doi:10.1088/0305-4470/14/11/009 1981

  77. [78]

    and Soethe, L

    Dexheimer, V. and Soethe, L. T. T. and Roark, J. and Gomes, R. O. and Kepler, S. O. and Schramm, S. Phase Transitions in Neutron Stars. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E. 2018. doi:10.1142/S0218301318300084. arXiv:1901.03252

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  78. [79]

    and Fischer, T

    Sagert, I. and Fischer, T. and Hempel, M. and Pagliara, G. and Schaffner-Bielich, J. and Mezzacappa, A. and Thielemann, F. -K. and Liebendorfer, M. Signals of the QCD phase transition in core-collapse supernovae. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.081101. arXiv:0809.4225

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  79. [80]

    Blaschke, D. B. and Sandin, F. and Skokov, V. V. and Typel, S. Accessibility of Color Superconducting Quark Matter Phases in Heavy-ion Collisions. Acta Phys. Polon. Supp. 2010. arXiv:1004.4375

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  80. [81]

    and Kettner, Christiane

    Glendenning, Norman K. and Kettner, Christiane. Nonidentical neutron star twins. Astron. Astrophys. 2000. arXiv:astro-ph/9807155

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

Showing first 80 references.