Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 39 references

Adding magnetic-monopole charge and tachyon kinetic energy to the Born-Infeld matter of a frozen star yields a single wave equation for its non-radial oscillations, with sound speeds of order γ and lifetimes of order 1/γ².

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 14:07 UTC pith:HK6BFFM6

load-bearing objection The dyonic Lagrangian re-derivation of the frozen-star spectrum is a neat idea, but the step that kills the tachyon perturbation (Eq. 57) doesn't survive scrutiny, and the fixed-q and Eq. (62) conditions are imposed rather than derived. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.18851 v1 pith:HK6BFFM6 submitted 2026-07-21 gr-qc hep-th

Defrosting the Born-Infeld dyonic frozen star with tachyon matter: spectrum of oscillations

Ram Brustein , A.J.M. Medved , Tamar Simhon This is my paper
classification gr-qc hep-th PACS 04.70.-s04.30.-w
keywords frozen starblack-hole mimickerBorn-Infeldtachyon mattermagnetic monopoleDirac stringoscillation spectrumgamma scaling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper aims to show that the internal oscillations of a 'frozen star'—a horizonless, singularity-free stand-in for an astrophysical black hole—can be derived from an explicit matter action rather than from a phenomenological fluid description. The key step is to add a small amount of magnetic-monopole charge and tachyon kinetic energy to the Born-Infeld string-fluid source, converting the rigid electric BIon into a 'DIon' with stretchable flux tubes. Solving the linearized Einstein–Born-Infeld equations then reproduces the same single wave equation obtained earlier from fluid perturbation theory, confirming that the oscillation modes have non-relativistic sound speeds of order γ and parametrically long lifetimes of order 1/γ². Because the equations come from a Lagrangian, the framework extends consistently to non-spherical, out-of-equilibrium configurations, making numerical studies of black-hole merger scenarios feasible.

Core claim

The central claim is that including a perturbative magnetic-monopole charge and tachyon kinetic energy in the Born-Infeld Lagrangian 'defrosts' the ultrarigid frozen star without spoiling spherical symmetry: the energy-momentum tensor acquires a transverse pressure q ∝ γ from the magnetic field and a positive ρ+p from tachyon matter. For the resulting dyonic configuration, the linearized Einstein equations reduce—at leading order in the defrosting parameter γ—to a single second-order wave equation for the even-parity metric perturbation K, Eq. (67), which is identical to the wave equation derived previously from a fluid model. The mode solutions therefore have oscillation frequencies scaling

What carries the argument

The central object is the Born-Infeld-type Lagrangian L′ = (1/2πα′)√(−½ K_ab K^ab) (plus Lagrange-multiplier and source terms), where K_ab is a two-form field strength encoding electric flux (K_01), magnetic flux (K_23), and tachyon momentum (K_0T). The key identity is the resulting energy-momentum tensor T^a_b = (1/2πα′) K^a_c K^bc / √(−½K²), which yields p = −ρ for pure electric flux and, once magnetic and tachyon pieces are included, transverse pressure q = |K_23|²/D and ρ+p = |K_0T|²/D. This mechanism—magnetic flux generating transverse pressure while tachyon momentum breaks the p = −ρ rigidity—is what carries the derivation; the final wave equation Eq. (67) follows after imposing that t

Load-bearing premise

The derivation hinges on treating the transverse pressure q = |K_23|²/D as a fixed background quantity when varying the energy-momentum tensor, and on using the background tachyon equation □T = 0 to drop the tachyon perturbation; if either step fails, the relation δp = −δD (valid to order γ²) and the final wave equation Eq. (67) need not hold.

What would settle it

Solve the linearized perturbations without the fixed-q assumption—i.e., vary q with the magnetic field—and check whether the wave equation for K still takes the form r²K″ + 3rK′ + (ω̃² − (ℓ²+ℓ−2))K = 0 at order γ². If a different equation appears, the claimed spectrum is invalid. Alternatively, numerically evolve the full Born-Infeld perturbation equations in a mildly non-spherical background: if the emergent modes do not have frequencies ∝ γ and lifetimes ∝ 1/γ², the central claim is falsified.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The internal modes of a frozen star are slow (ω ∝ γ) and very long-lived (lifetime ∝ 1/γ²), unlike the rapidly damped quasi-normal modes of a classical black hole; this is a potential gravitational-wave discriminator.
  • Because the perturbation equations are derived from a Lagrangian, they remain consistent for arbitrarily large deviations from spherical symmetry, enabling numerical studies of frozen stars during mergers or other out-of-equilibrium processes.
  • The defrosted star is necessarily dyonic: it contains a central magnetic monopole and an opposite monopole layer on the surface, with a finite trapped Dirac string along the polar axis; this structure is compatible with the external Schwarzschild vacuum.
  • The spectrum matches the polymer-black-hole result with the defrosting parameter γ playing the role of the string coupling g_s, supporting the interpretation of the frozen star as the classical incarnation of the collapsed polymer model.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the Lagrangian formulation is extended to the rotating Kerr-mimicker version of the frozen star, one would expect the same γ and 1/γ² scaling for its non-radial modes; a numerical check of that expectation would test whether the wave equation survives rotation.
  • The fixed-q assumption could be relaxed by including magnetic-field fluctuations δB₁; if those fluctuations were retained, the relation δp = −δD would acquire γ² corrections that could either confirm or shift the mode frequencies and lifetimes at the same order.
  • A direct observational test might be to search for long-lived, low-frequency oscillations (gravitational-wave echoes with characteristic γ scaling) in the post-merger ringdown of binary black-hole events; the paper's spectrum provides a concrete template for such searches.
  • The Dirac string trapped inside the star hints at a topological origin for the rigidity-to-flexibility transition; if the string is stable under perturbations, it could provide a topological signature distinguishing frozen stars from other horizonless objects.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper extends the frozen-star model, previously sourced by a Born-Infeld-like string fluid, by adding a small magnetic-monopole charge and tachyon kinetic energy. This 'defrosted' star is modeled as a dyonic BIon with a central electric and magnetic charge and opposite surface charge layers, including a confined Dirac string. The authors then perturb the Born-Infeld/tachyon Lagrangian coupled to Einstein gravity and, in Section 7, derive a wave equation for the even-parity metric perturbation K, Eq. (67). This equation is claimed to match Eq. (4.7) of the earlier fluid-based paper [11], thereby 'verifying' the previous results that internal sound velocities scale as gamma and lifetimes as 1/gamma^2. The central claim is that this Lagrangian derivation provides a more fundamental and general consistency guarantee for the perturbation equations than the previous fluid approach.

Significance. If the derivation were sound, the paper would be a useful contribution to the frozen-star program: it provides an explicit matter Lagrangian for the defrosted star, identifies the magnetic-monopole/tachyon content needed to support the background, and offers a route to non-spherically-symmetric and non-linear studies. The background construction in Sections 5 and 6, including the solution for |K01|^2, |K0T|^2, |K23|^2 and the truncated Dirac string, is explicit and could be valuable. However, the central perturbation derivation in Section 7 is not presently reliable. The final equation is obtained only after an invalid integration by parts, an undeclared 'fixed q' assumption, and an ad hoc condition that is effectively equivalent to the result being derived. The advertised 'verification' is therefore not yet established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 7.2, Eq. (57)] The identity K_{0T} delta K_{0T} = partial_t T delta(partial_t T) = -delta T Box T is not valid at a point. Integration by parts is legitimate only under a spacetime integral, not inside the pointwise variation of the energy-momentum tensor. For a mode delta T = tau(r) Y_lm e^{i omega t}, the left-hand side equals i omega (partial_t T0) tau e^{i omega t}, which is generically nonzero even when the background tachyon satisfies Box T=0. The linearized tachyon equation must be solved and its on-shell value shown to vanish; this is not done. Since Eq. (57) is used to drop the tachyon-fluctuation term in Eq. (56), the key relation Eq. (59), and hence Eqs. (65) and (67), receive uncontrolled corrections.
  2. [Section 7.2, footnote 6] The transverse pressure q = |K23|^2/D is declared to be a fixed quantity when computing delta p. This suppresses magnetic-field fluctuations without deriving them from the Born-Infeld equations of motion. The conclusion delta p = -delta D to at least order gamma^2 depends on this assumption. If magnetic fluctuations are not suppressed, Eq. (52) and the subsequent use of Eq. (60) in Eq. (65) need modification. The paper does not justify that the magnetic sector is non-dynamical at this order.
  3. [Section 7.3 and Appendix A, Eq. (62)] Equation (62), 1/2 l(l+1) H0 = -gamma tilde{omega}^2 K, is imposed rather than derived from the perturbed Einstein equations. The Appendix 'justifies' it by requiring that the order-gamma^2 terms reproduce Eq. (64), which is precisely the relation being derived from the Lagrangian. The final wave equation Eq. (67) is then shown to follow from this same requirement. Thus the spectrum is effectively put in by hand rather than obtained from a consistent Lagrangian perturbation. The authors need to show that Eq. (62) follows from the linearized equations of motion (including the matter sector) before the claim of verification can be accepted.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 5, Eq. (28)] The notation |K_{AB}|^2 is used in Eq. (28) but only defined afterward. Please move the definition before its first use.
  2. [Section 5, Eq. (27)] The inequality chain 'q = T^2_2 > 0 = T^3_3 > 0' is garbled; it should state q = T^2_2 = T^3_3 > 0.
  3. [Abstract and Section 8] The claim that the Lagrangian formulation guarantees consistency 'for arbitrary deviations away from spherical symmetry' is stronger than what is shown. The perturbation analysis uses spherical-harmonic decomposition, the Regge-Wheeler gauge, and even-parity perturbations only.
  4. [Section 6] The Dirac-string discussion is somewhat detached from the later perturbation analysis. It would be helpful to state explicitly whether the string contributes to the perturbation equations or is gauge-dependent and irrelevant to the mode equation.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Oscillation spectrum is not fitted to data, but the load-bearing condition Eq. (62) is imposed rather than derived and is 'justified' by reproducing the target equation Eq. (67), making the central prediction partially self-consistent by construction.

specific steps
  1. other [Section 7.3, Eq. (62), and Appendix A]
    "We cannot be conclusive at this point as to what constitutes the γ^2-order correction to D. However, if we impose the condition that 1/2 ℓ(ℓ+1)H0 = -γ \tildeω^2K (62) ... This condition guarantees, as shown in the Appendix, that to order γ^2, the perturbations obey the same equation of state as that of the lowest-order term in Eq. (59), δρ+δp=-2γδρ, in a way that is consistent with the final equation for K, Eq (67)."

    The relation between H0 and K in Eq. (62) is not derived from the linearized Born-Infeld/tachyon equations or the remaining Einstein equations; it is imposed so that the γ\tildeω^2K correction cancels from δD in Eq. (63). The Appendix then 'justifies' Eq. (62) by requiring the order-γ^2 terms to satisfy the already-used equation of state Eq. (64), and this requirement algebraically yields Eq. (72), which is identical to the advertised final wave equation Eq. (67). Thus the final spectrum is obtained by selecting a condition whose only stated consistency check is the result it is meant to produce; the prediction is partly a self-consistency constraint rather than an independent output of the Lagrangian.

full rationale

Most of the paper is a genuine Lagrangian-based rederivation: Section 5 fits the BI field magnitudes to the known defrosted-star background densities, which is a construction step, not a circular prediction. The perturbation algebra leading to Eq. (67) is substantial and is compared with, not derived from, the authors' earlier [11]. However, the derivation of the central wave equation depends on Eq. (62), an imposed H0-K relation. Appendix A does not derive this relation; it shows that imposing it and then demanding the order-γ^2 equation of state Eq. (64) reproduces Eq. (67). Since Eq. (62) was chosen to make the final equation come out, the spectrum is partially by construction. The additional weak points noted in the text (the integration by parts in Eq. (57) and the 'fixed q' assumption in Section 7.2) are correctness risks, not circularity, so they do not increase the score. Self-citations to [11] are used for post-derivation comparison, not as load-bearing inputs. Score 4 reflects one central imposed condition that makes the prediction self-consistent rather than fully independent.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 6 axioms · 4 invented entities

The central derivation rests on the string-theoretic effective action (tachyon/Born-Infeld) and on earlier frozen-star background choices. The only new ad hoc input is the 'fixed q' assumption in the perturbation calculation.

free parameters (2)
  • γ (defrosting parameter) = 0<γ<<1 (dimensionless, not fitted but chosen)
    Introduced to quantify departure from p=-ρ; sets sound speed (∝γ) and lifetime (∝1/γ²).
  • ε² (frozen-star smallness parameter) = exponentially small
    Appears in the frozen-star metric (Eq. 1) and in the hierarchy ε²≪γ≪1; not directly in the final spectrum.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Sen's tachyon effective action (Eq. 13) describes the endpoint of D-brane decay
    The matter model is taken from open-string tachyon condensation; the paper does not derive it.
  • domain assumption Dual Born-Infeld Lagrangian construction of Gibbons-Hori-Yi (Eqs. 15-17) is valid, including the K∧K=0 constraint
    Adopted from [16] to represent flux tubes/string fluid.
  • domain assumption Defrosted metric ansatz -g_tt=γ(r/R)², g_rr=γ (Eqs. 6-7) with a=2,b=0 from [9]
    The background spacetime is imported from earlier frozen-star work.
  • domain assumption Background tachyon is homogeneous and at the minimum of its potential (V=0, □T=0)
    Used to drop tachyon fluctuation terms in δp (Eq. 57).
  • ad hoc to paper Transverse pressure q is fixed during perturbations
    Stated 'as is standard practice' in Sec. 7.2; not derived from equations of motion.
  • domain assumption Magnetic monopole and Dirac string are consistent; Dirac quantization not relevant
    Exterior neutrality means no quantization condition (Sec. 6).
invented entities (4)
  • Core magnetic monopole no independent evidence
    purpose: Generate radial magnetic field/transverse pressure without breaking spherical symmetry
    No exterior handle; the star is neutral outside.
  • Surface magnetic charge layer no independent evidence
    purpose: Terminate magnetic flux and keep exterior vacuum
    No exterior handle; part of the internal construction.
  • Confined Dirac string no independent evidence
    purpose: Regularize the monopole vector potential inside the star
    Mathematical artifact of the monopole; no independent observational signature.
  • Tachyon kinetic energy (homogeneous tachyon matter) no independent evidence
    purpose: Allow flux tubes to stretch/contract and produce ρ+p>0
    Tachyon is a string-theory ingredient; its presence in the star is model-internal.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 15234 in / 18272 out tokens · 141296 ms · 2026-08-01T14:07:28.014579+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The frozen star is a model for the interior of an astrophysical black hole that is externally indistinguishable from the singular geometry of a Schwarzschild black hole, even though it contains no singularities nor trapped surfaces. The frozen star corresponds to a macroscopic ``BIon'', a solution of a certain type of Born-Infeld Lagrangian coupled to Einstein gravity, which consists of rigid flux tubes sourced by an electric charge localized at its center and a uniform distribution of opposite charge along its outer surface. This configuration is a solution of the effective action that describes the end point of tachyon condensation in string. The rigidity of the flux tubes implies that the star is ultrastable under linear perturbations of the geometry and matter. The star can be effectively deformed, or ``defrosted'', allowing internal pulsations, as expected from regular, horizonless astrophysical black holes. To describe the defrosted star, we need to include a perturbative amount of magnetic-monopole charge and tachyon kinetic energy. This recasts the star as a macroscopic ``DIon'', whose flux tubes can stretch and contract, having both electric and magnetic charges localized at its center and distributed uniformly along its outer surface. Previously, the non-radial oscillations of the defrosted star were analyzed to leading order in a perturbative ``defrosting'' parameter $\gamma$, by describing the energy-momentum tensor as that of a fluid. Here, we derive the same spectrum in a much simpler way, using the Born-Infeld Lagrangian. Thus, we verify that the sound velocities scale as $\gamma$ and the parametrically long lifetimes scale as $1/\gamma^2$. Because the perturbation equations are derived from a Lagrangian, their consistency is guaranteed for arbitrary deviations away from spherical symmetry, facilitating numerical studies on frozen stars away from equilibrium.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.18851 by A.J.M. Medved, Ram Brustein, Tamar Simhon.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A magnetic monopole enclosed by a shell of equal and opposite [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_1.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 30 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Black Holes: Com- plementarity or Firewalls?,

    A. Almheiri, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski and J. Sully, “Black Holes: Com- plementarity or Firewalls?,” JHEP02, 062 (2013) [arXiv:1207.3123 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  2. [2]

    Testing the nature of dark compact objects: a status report,

    V. Cardoso and P. Pani, “Testing the nature of dark compact objects: a status report,” Living Rev. Rel.22, no.1, 4 (2019) [arXiv:1904.05363 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  3. [3]

    Black hole mimickers: from theory to observation,

    C. Bambi, R. Brustein, V. Cardoso, A. Chael, U. Danielsson, S. Giri, A. Gupta, P. Heidmann, L. Lehner and S. Liebling,et al.“Black hole mimickers: from theory to observation,” [arXiv:2505.09014 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  4. [4]

    Towards a non-singular paradigm of black hole physics,

    R. Carballo-Rubio, F. Di Filippo, S. Liberati, M. Visser, J. Arrechea, C. Barcel´ o, A. Bonanno, J. Borissova, V. Boyanov and V. Cardoso,et al.“Towards a non-singular paradigm of black hole physics,” JCAP05, 003 (2025) [arXiv:2501.05505 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    Resisting collapse: How matter inside a black hole can withstand gravity,

    R. Brustein and A. J. M. Medved, “Resisting collapse: How matter inside a black hole can withstand gravity,” Phys. Rev. D99, no.6, 064019 (2019) [arXiv:1805.11667 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  6. [6]

    Non-Singular Black Holes Interiors Need Physics Beyond the Standard Model,

    R. Brustein and A. J. M. Medved, “Non-Singular Black Holes Interiors Need Physics Beyond the Standard Model,” Fortsch. Phys.67, no.10, 1900058 (2019) [arXiv:1902.07990 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  7. [7]

    Black holes as frozen stars,

    R. Brustein, A. J. M. Medved and T. Simhon, “Black holes as frozen stars,” Phys. Rev. D105, no.2, 024019 (2022) [arXiv:2109.10017 [gr-qc]]. 33

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  8. [8]

    Black Holes as Frozen Stars: Regular Interior Geometry,

    R. Brustein, A. J. M. Medved, T. Shindelman and T. Simhon, “Black Holes as Frozen Stars: Regular Interior Geometry,” Fortsch. Phys.72, no.1, 2300188 (2024) [arXiv:2301.09712 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    Defrosting frozen stars: spectrum of internal fluid modes,

    R. Brustein, A. J. M. Medved and T. Shindelman, “Defrosting frozen stars: spectrum of internal fluid modes,” Phys. Rev. D108, no.4, 044058 (2023) [arXiv:2304.04984 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  10. [10]

    Thermodynamics of frozen stars,

    R. Brustein, A. J. M. Medved and T. Simhon, “Thermodynamics of frozen stars,” Phys. Rev. D110, no.2, 024066 (2024) [arXiv:2310.11572 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  11. [11]

    Defrosting frozen stars: Spectrum of nonradial oscillations,

    R. Brustein, A. J. M. Medved and T. Shindelman, “Defrosting frozen stars: Spectrum of nonradial oscillations,” Phys. Rev. D110(2024) no.12, 124067 [arXiv:2410.00493 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  12. [12]

    Sourcing the Kerr geometry,

    R. Brustein and A. J. M. Medved, “Sourcing the Kerr geometry,” Fortsch. Phys.73, no.4, 2400256 (2025) [arXiv:2310.16467 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    Frozen stars: Black hole mimickers sourced by a string fluid,

    R. Brustein and A. J. M. Medved, “Frozen stars: Black hole mimickers sourced by a string fluid,” Phys. Rev. D110, no.10, 104004 (2024) [arXiv:2404.15985 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  14. [14]

    Formation of Frozen Stars from collapsing matter by tunneling,

    R. Brustein, A. J. M. Medved and T. Simhon, “Formation of Frozen Stars from collapsing matter by tunneling,” Phys. Rev. D113, no.10, 104008 (2026) [arXiv:2508.02100 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  15. [15]

    Kerr black hole mimick- ers sourced by a string fluid,

    R. Brustein, A. J. M. Medved and T. Simhon, “Kerr black hole mimick- ers sourced by a string fluid,” JCAP11, 044 (2024) [arXiv:2409.06454 [hep-th]]. 34

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    String fluid from unstable D- branes,

    G. W. Gibbons, K. Hori and P. Yi, “String fluid from unstable D- branes,” Nucl. Phys. B596, 136 (2001) [arXiv:hep-th/0009061 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  17. [17]

    O. K. Kwon and P. Yi, JHEP09, 003 (2003) [arXiv:hep-th/0305229 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  18. [18]

    Open / closed duality, unstable D-branes, and coarse grained closed strings,

    H. U. Yee and P. Yi, “Open / closed duality, unstable D-branes, and coarse grained closed strings,” Nucl. Phys. B686, 31 (2004) [arXiv:hep- th/0402027 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2004

  19. [19]

    Tachyon condensation on the brane anti-brane system,

    A. Sen, “Tachyon condensation on the brane anti-brane system,” JHEP 08, 012 (1998) [arXiv:hep-th/9805170 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  20. [20]

    BPS D-branes on nonsupersymmetric cycles,

    A. Sen, “BPS D-branes on nonsupersymmetric cycles,” JHEP12, 021 (1998) [arXiv:hep-th/9812031 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  21. [21]

    NonBPS states and Branes in string theory,

    A. Sen, “NonBPS states and Branes in string theory,” [arXiv:hep- th/9904207 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  22. [22]

    Supersymmetric world volume action for nonBPS D-branes,

    A. Sen, “Supersymmetric world volume action for nonBPS D-branes,” JHEP10, 008 (1999) [arXiv:hep-th/9909062 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  23. [23]

    Universality of the tachyon potential,

    A. Sen, “Universality of the tachyon potential,” JHEP12, 027 (1999) [arXiv:hep-th/9911116 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  24. [24]

    Born-Infeld particles and Dirichlet p-branes,

    G. W. Gibbons, “Born-Infeld particles and Dirichlet p-branes,” Nucl. Phys. B514, 603-639 (1998) [arXiv:hep-th/9709027 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  25. [25]

    Aspects of Born-Infeld theory and string / M theory,

    G. W. Gibbons, “Aspects of Born-Infeld theory and string / M theory,” AIP Conf. Proc.589, no.1, 324 (2001) [arXiv:hep-th/0106059 [hep-th]]. 35

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  26. [26]

    Quantum state of the black hole interior,

    R. Brustein and A. J. M. Medved, “Quantum state of the black hole interior,” JHEP1508, 082 (2015) [arXiv:1505.07131 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  27. [27]

    Black holes as collapsed polymers,

    R. Brustein and A. J. M. Medved, “Black holes as collapsed polymers,” Fortsch. Phys.65, no. 1, 1600114 (2017) [arXiv:1602.07706 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  28. [28]

    Emergent horizon, Hawking radia- tion and chaos in the collapsed polymer model of a black hole,

    R. Brustein and A. J. M. Medved,“Emergent horizon, Hawking radia- tion and chaos in the collapsed polymer model of a black hole,” Fortsch. Phys. 65, 0116 (2017) [arXiv:1607.03721 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  29. [29]

    When black holes collide: Probing the interior composition by the spectrum of ringdown modes and emitted gravitational waves,

    R. Brustein, A. J. M. Medved and K. Yagi, “When black holes collide: Probing the interior composition by the spectrum of ringdown modes and emitted gravitational waves,” Phys. Rev. D96, no.6, 064033 (2017) [arXiv:1704.05789 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  30. [30]

    The non-radial oscillations of polytropic stars,

    T. G. Cowling, “The non-radial oscillations of polytropic stars,” MN- RAS 101, 367 (1941)

    1941

  31. [31]

    A Magnetic Model of Matter,

    J. Schwinger, “A Magnetic Model of Matter,” Science165, 757–761 (1969)

    1969

  32. [32]

    Quantised singularities in the electromagnetic field,

    P. A. M. Dirac, “Quantised singularities in the electromagnetic field,” Proc. Roy. Soc. A13360–72 (1931)

    1931

  33. [33]

    Selfduality of Born-Infeld action and Dirichlet three- brane of type IIB superstring theory,

    A. A. Tseytlin, “Selfduality of Born-Infeld action and Dirichlet three- brane of type IIB superstring theory,” Nucl. Phys. B469, 51 (1996) [arXiv:hep-th/9602064 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  34. [34]

    Clouds Of Strings In General Relativity,

    P. S. Letelier, “Clouds Of Strings In General Relativity,” Phys. Rev. D 201294 (1979). 36

    1979

  35. [35]

    Tachyon dynamics in open string theory,

    A. Sen, “Tachyon dynamics in open string theory,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A20, 5513 (2005) [arXiv:hep-th/0410103 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  36. [36]

    Dirac quantisation condition: a comprehensive review,

    R. Heras, “Dirac quantisation condition: a comprehensive review,” Con- temp. Phys.59(2018) no.4, 331-355 [arXiv:1810.13403 [physics.hist- ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  37. [37]

    Stability of a Schwarzschild singularity,

    T. Regge and J. Wheeler, “Stability of a Schwarzschild singularity,” Phys. Rev.108, 1063 (1957)

    1957

  38. [38]

    Non-radial pulsation of general- rel- ativistic stellar models. I. Analytic analysis for L larger than 2,

    K. Thorne and A. Campolattaro, “Non-radial pulsation of general- rel- ativistic stellar models. I. Analytic analysis for L larger than 2,” Astro- phys. J.149, 591 (1967)

    1967

  39. [39]

    On the nonradial pulsations of general relativistic stellar models,

    S. L. Detweiler and L. Lindblom, “On the nonradial pulsations of general relativistic stellar models,” Astrophys. J.292, 12-15 (1985). 37

    1985