Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 50 references

Polarized light can turn a zero-net-magnetization p-wave magnet into a finite spin-polarized state, with the magnetization sign set by the light polarization.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 12:38 UTC pith:OGJ4ONDN

load-bearing objection The p-wave Floquet mechanism is novel and mostly right; the magnetization prediction rests on an undefended steady-state assumption, and the f-wave section is a sketch. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.19483 v1 pith:OGJ4ONDN submitted 2026-07-21 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci

Optical Magnetic Switching in Odd-Parity Magnets with Spin-Orbit Coupling

SangEun Han , Qiang Li This is my paper
classification cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords p-wave magnetodd-parity magnetismFloquet engineeringspin-orbit couplingmagnetization switchingChern numberf-wave magnetpolarized light
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper tries to establish that in odd-parity magnets with spin-orbit coupling—specifically p-wave and f-wave magnets—polarized light generates a momentum-independent spin-dependent term in the effective Floquet Hamiltonian. This uniform spin field shifts the spin texture in momentum space, so the cancellation that keeps the net magnetization zero is spoiled, and the system acquires a finite magnetization whose sign is controlled by the light's handedness. The same Floquet correction opens band gaps and gives the engineered bands a Chern number of -2 sgn(ηA_xA_y), also reversible by changing polarization. For f-wave magnets, circularly polarized light leaves only an out-of-plane magnetization, offering a clean experimental signature. A sympathetic reader would care because this proposes an all-optical route to switch magnetism and band topology in a broad class of materials without static magnetic fields.

Core claim

Using a high-frequency Floquet expansion and Peierls substitution, the paper shows that the leading 1/ω correction to the p-wave magnet Hamiltonian H_p = t(k_x²+k_y²)σ₀ + λ(k_xσ_y − k_yσ_x) + J(k_x cosθ + k_y sinθ)σ_z is a momentum-independent term, λ′(cosθ σ_y − sinθ σ_x) − J′ σ_z, with λ′ = ηA_xA_yJλ/ω and J′ = ηA_xA_yλ²/ω. Because this induced spin-dependent field is uniform in momentum, it displaces the center of the spin texture; when the Fermi sea is small (k_F ≲ |A_xA_yJ/ω|), the occupied-state spin integral no longer cancels, producing a finite net magnetization whose sign follows sgn(ηA_xA_y). The Floquet-engineered bands carry Chern number C_lattice = −2 sgn(ηA_xA_y) on both square

What carries the argument

The Floquet high-frequency expansion, Eq. (1), applied to the Peierls-substituted lattice Hamiltonian: the n = ±1 Fourier components generate a commutator [H₊₁, H₋₁]/(nω) that yields the momentum-independent spin-dependent term, while the n = ±2 components cancel because H₊₂ = H₋₂. This uniform Floquet spin field is the object that shifts the spin texture and controls both the magnetization and the Chern number, with the small-Fermi-sea condition k_F ≲ |A_xA_yJ/ω| determining when the net magnetization appears.

Load-bearing premise

The magnetization and Chern-number results assume that, under continuous driving, electrons occupy the Floquet bands according to an equilibrium Fermi–Dirac distribution at a fixed chemical potential; the paper argues heating is exponentially suppressed only in a prethermal window and does not derive the actual nonequilibrium carrier distribution, so if photon-assisted processes redistribute carriers, the predicted finite magnetization and its polarization reversal may not be

What would settle it

Measure the polar magneto-optical Kerr rotation (or the anomalous Hall conductance) of a p-wave magnet candidate such as CeNiAsO under near-infrared circularly polarized light while holding intensity fixed and flipping the helicity. The paper predicts the out-of-plane magnetization and the anomalous Hall sign should reverse exactly with sgn(ηA_xA_y); if the Kerr signal or Hall response does not reverse sign under this flip—or shows no signal even when k_F is small compared to |A_xA_yJ/ω|—the central claim would be falsified.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • A p-wave magnet that initially has zero net magnetization becomes spin-polarized under elliptically polarized light, with the polarization sign (ηA_xA_y) determining whether the magnetization points up or down.
  • The Floquet-engineered bands carry Chern number C_lattice = −2 sgn(ηA_xA_y), so the anomalous Hall response reverses when the light's handedness is flipped; the system remains metallic, so the response is not a quantized Hall plateau.
  • The effect is generic to odd-parity magnets with SOC: square-lattice and triangular-lattice regularizations give the same sign rule, indicating that the mechanism does not depend on a specific lattice structure.
  • For f-wave magnets, circularly polarized light eliminates the uniform in-plane component and produces a purely out-of-plane magnetization, measurable via polar magneto-optical Kerr rotation, while elliptically polarized light generates both in-plane and out-of-plane components.
  • The magnetization and the Chern number change continuously with light intensity, and their signs are fixed by sgn(ηA_xA_y) at any intensity, providing an all-optical, continuously tunable switching mechanism.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: The same symmetry argument that produces a momentum-independent term for p-wave (odd k) splitting should also produce uniform spin-dependent terms for higher odd-parity cases such as h-wave magnets; the paper does not compute those, but the pattern is a natural extension.
  • Editorial inference: The switching threshold k_F ≲ |A_xA_yJ/ω| gives a testable scaling prediction—by tuning the chemical potential to shrink or grow the Fermi surface, the onset of light-induced magnetization should move accordingly; the paper leaves this quantitative dependence implicit.
  • Editorial inference: Because the Chern number is not quantized in the metallic state, the cleanest experimental test is the sign of the anomalous Hall effect as a function of polarization; the paper predicts it should reverse at every intensity, which is a sharp and directly checkable statement.
  • Editorial inference: The calculation assumes that the driven steady state is a Fermi–Dirac occupation of the Floquet bands; a pump–probe photoemission experiment could test this occupation assumption directly, and if heating or photon-assisted redistribution dominates, the predicted magnetization may not appear even if the effective Hamiltonian is correct.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies Floquet engineering of odd-parity (p-wave and f-wave) magnets with spin-orbit coupling. For a p-wave magnet described by H_p = t(k_x^2+k_y^2)σ0 + λ(k_x σ_y - k_y σ_x) + J(k_x cosθ + k_y sinθ)σ_z, the authors show that elliptically polarized light generates, to leading order in 1/ω, a momentum-independent spin-dependent correction λ′(cosθ σ_y - sinθ σ_x) - J′σ_z, with λ′ = η A_x A_y J λ/ω and J′ = η A_x A_y λ²/ω (Eqs. (4)-(5)). This uniform field shifts the spin texture in momentum space, so that a zero-net-magnetization p-wave state acquires a finite spin polarization when the Fermi surface is sufficiently small. The same term opens gaps and produces Floquet bands with Chern number C_lattice = -2 sgn(η A_x A_y), reversible by light polarization. For f-wave magnets, the paper claims that circularly polarized light yields a purely out-of-plane magnetization, while elliptically polarized light gives both in-plane and out-of-plane components, and that polarized light generates polarization-dependent Chern bands. The analysis is performed on square and triangular lattice regularizations, with explicit lattice Hamiltonians and Bessel-function expressions for the Floquet components.

Significance. If established, the central result is significant: it identifies a qualitatively new Floquet response of odd-parity magnets (a momentum-independent effective Zeeman field, as opposed to momentum-dependent SOC generation in even-parity altermagnets), with falsifiable predictions of polarization-controlled magnetization and Chern number. The paper has real strengths: the p-wave effective Hamiltonian is obtained by explicit commutator algebra, the Berry-curvature expression integrates to the stated local Chern number, both square and triangular regularizations are treated, and the parameter estimates connect to concrete candidate materials. The claims are not circular: the predictions are not used to fit the model parameters. However, the observable magnetization prediction rests on an unproven assumption about the occupation of Floquet bands, and the f-wave effective Hamiltonian is asserted without derivation. These gaps are load-bearing for the central claims.

major comments (3)
  1. [Spin texture and magnetic structure; Figs. 4, 7, 10] The central observable — finite net spin polarization and its reversal under η → -η — is computed by filling the Floquet bands with a Fermi-Dirac distribution at fixed chemical potential: ⟨S_i⟩_tot is summed over occupied eigenstates of the effective Hamiltonian in Eq. (4). This occupation is never derived. For a closed noninteracting driven system there is no relaxation to such a distribution, and for a system coupled to a bath the Floquet steady state generally differs from Fermi-Dirac in the Floquet basis. The End Matter 'Estimation' argues only that heating is exponentially suppressed in the prethermal window (refs. [48-50]); it does not establish that the carrier distribution is the equilibrium distribution of H_eff. Since the sign and magnitude of the magnetization are governed by which Floquet states are occupied, this assumption is load-bearing for the optical-switching claim. Th
  2. [End Matter, Eq. (25)] The f-wave effective Hamiltonian H_f,eff is stated without derivation. Unlike the p-wave case, where the commutator calculation is shown in the End Matter, Eq. (25) is presented as an input. The f-wave claims — that CPL leaves a purely out-of-plane magnetization, that EPL generates both in-plane and out-of-plane components, and the Chern-number structure of Fig. 11 — all rest on this Hamiltonian. The paper needs to provide the derivation (Fourier components and the resulting commutator) or a clear reference. As written, this is an unverified assertion in a section that contributes to the central narrative.
  3. [End Matter, 'Details of High-frequency expansion'; Eq. (20) and Eq. (4)] Eq. (20) preserves the full Bessel functions J_0 and J_1, but the low-energy effective Hamiltonian Eq. (4) is obtained by expanding 'with J_0(x)≈1 and J_1(x)≈x/2 for sufficiently small x'. The figures, however, use A_x = A_y = 1.8, for which J_0(1.8) ≈ 0.34 and J_1(1.8) ≈ 0.58, far from 1 and 0.9. Thus the quantitative plots (Fermi surfaces, spin textures, polarization magnitudes) are not controlled by the stated small-amplitude expansion, even though the leading-order sign structure follows from J_1(-A) = -J_1(A). The authors should either state the validity regime of the small-A expansion quantitatively, use the exact Bessel expressions in the numerics, or justify why the low-order approximation remains accurate at A = 1.8.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] 'p-wave magnets exhibit odd-parity spin polarization in momentum space' would be clearer as 'odd-parity spin splitting', since the net polarization is zero.
  2. [Spin texture and magnetic structure, text after Fig. 3] The sentence 'This is absent in the even-parity altermagnet' refers to the shift of the spin-texture center, but the antecedent is not fully explicit. Consider rephrasing for clarity.
  3. [Eq. (6)] The Berry-curvature expression is written specifically for θ=0 and near Γ. It would help to state the parameter regime and to define δ consistently before using it in Eq. (7).
  4. [End Matter, f-wave section] In Fig. 11 the caption describes the Chern number of the 'upper band', while the main text refers to Floquet-engineered bands generally; please verify the consistency of the band-labeling convention.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity found: derivation is self-contained from the stated model and standard Floquet expansion.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained. The effective Hamiltonian in Eqs. (4)–(5) follows from an explicit commutator calculation using the Peierls-substituted lattice Hamiltonian, as shown in Eqs. (18)–(20) of the End Matter. The parameters λ′ and J′ are computed, not fitted to any target observable. The Chern number and spin polarization are evaluated from the eigenstates of H_eff and are not used to determine any model parameter. The cited prior work [23] is used for comparison and for the standard expansion formula, but the expansion itself is also referenced to independent established methods [29–35]; no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported solely from the authors' prior work. The Fermi-Dirac occupation assumption for the Floquet bands is a physical modeling assumption relevant to correctness or applicability, not a circular step: it is not defined in terms of the predicted magnetization, and the paper explicitly notes heating is unavoidable and that the static description applies only within a prethermal window. Thus no evidence satisfies the hard-rule requirement of exhibiting a specific reduction of a prediction to an input or self-citation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

6 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The model inputs (t, J, λ, ω, A_x, A_y, μ) are chosen by hand but are not fitted to any target result; they are scan parameters. The most fragile input is the f-wave effective Hamiltonian (Eq. 25), which is presented without derivation and without specifying the f-wave lattice regularization. No new particles, forces, or degrees of freedom are introduced.

free parameters (6)
  • hopping amplitude t = 1 (dimensionless); benchmarked to 0.2 eV
    Overall energy scale for all figures; chosen by hand, not fitted to any target result.
  • p-wave coupling J = 0.3 t (0.06 eV)
    Chosen for the figures; the switching condition k_F ≲ |A_x A_y J/ω| depends on it.
  • spin-orbit coupling λ = 0.6 t (0.12 eV)
    Chosen for the figures; the induced field magnitudes λ′, J′ are proportional to λ and λ².
  • drive frequency ω = 5 t (1.0 eV)
    Fixed to satisfy the high-frequency condition J/ω = 0.06, λ/ω = 0.12, μ/ω ≈ 0.5.
  • dimensionless vector-potential amplitude A_x = A_y = 1.8
    Strong-drive illustrative value; corresponds to I ≈ 2.69×10^12 W/cm² for a = 4 Å and t = 0.2 eV.
  • chemical potential μ = 2.536 t
    Chosen so that the lower band is partially occupied; the net-magnetization effect requires a small Fermi surface.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The p-wave magnet effective Hamiltonian H_p = t(k_x²+k_y²)σ0 + λ(k_x σy − k_y σx) + J(k_x cosθ + k_y sinθ)σz describes a physical zero-net-magnetization odd-parity magnet.
    Taken from refs. [11,12]; the entire analysis starts from this model.
  • domain assumption The Floquet high-frequency expansion truncated at O(1/ω) is valid and the system remains in a prethermal regime.
    Used to derive Eqs. (4), (20), and (25); the paper argues J/ω, λ/ω < 1 but does not rigorously bound μ/ω (μ/ω ≈ 0.5).
  • domain assumption The driven steady state is described by equilibrium Fermi-Dirac occupation of the effective static Hamiltonian at the undriven chemical potential.
    Needed to compute ⟨S_i⟩_tot and ⟨S_i⟩_ave; not derived from a bath or kinetic equation.
  • domain assumption Square and triangular lattice regularizations with Peierls substitution capture the low-energy continuum physics.
    Both regularizations are used and show consistent qualitative results.
  • ad hoc to paper Eq. (25) is the correct leading-order Floquet effective Hamiltonian for the f-wave magnet.
    Stated without derivation; all f-wave conclusions (CPL out-of-plane magnetization, EPL in-plane components) rest on it.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 14138 in / 32023 out tokens · 302638 ms · 2026-08-01T12:38:30.752920+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

$p$-wave magnets exhibit odd-parity spin polarization in momentum space, with spin splitting that reverses under $\vec{k}\rightarrow -\vec{k}$, while preserving zero net magnetization. Here we show that, in odd-parity magnets with spin-orbit coupling, elliptically polarized light generates a momentum-independent spin-dependent term that dynamically switches a zero-net-magnetization $p$-wave state into a finite spin-polarized state. The Floquet-engineered bands also acquire a nonzero Chern number whose sign is controlled by the light polarization. For $f$-wave magnets, circularly polarized light induces a net out-of-plane magnetization, offering a direct experimental signature. Our results establish light as an efficient means of controlling magnetic states, with potential applications in spintronics and quantum information.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.19483 by Qiang Li, Sangeun Han.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The Fermi surfaces before and after introducing polarized light in the square-lattice regularization in the first Brillouin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The lattice Chern number of the lower Floquet [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The spin texture of the lower band of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The total and averaged spin polarizations over occu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The Fermi surfaces before and after introducing polarized light in a triangular-lattice regularization in the first [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The lattice Chern number of the lower Floquet [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The triangular-lattice results for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. The Fermi surfaces of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. The spin texture of the upper band near Γ point be [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. The spin polarizations in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. The lattice Chern number [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_11.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 5 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conven- tional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X12, 031042 (2022)

    2022

  2. [2]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging re- search landscape of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X12, 040501 (2022)

    2022

  3. [3]

    L. Bai, W. Feng, S. Liu, L. ˇSmejkal, Y. Mokrousov, and Y. Yao, Altermagnetism: Exploring new frontiers in mag- netism and spintronics, Advanced Functional Materials 34, 2409327 (2024)

    2024

  4. [4]

    C. Song, H. Bai, Z. Zhou, L. Han, H. Reichlova, J. H. Dil, J. Liu, X. Chen, and F. Pan, Altermagnets as a new class of functional materials, Nature Reviews Materials 10, 473 (2025)

    2025

  5. [5]

    R. M. Fernandes, V. S. de Carvalho, T. Birol, and R. G. Pereira, Topological transition from nodal to nodeless zeeman splitting in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B109, 024404 (2024)

    2024

  6. [6]

    Y. Fang, J. Cano, and S. A. A. Ghorashi, Quantum geom- etry induced nonlinear transport in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 106701 (2024)

    2024

  7. [7]

    S. A. A. Ghorashi, T. L. Hughes, and J. Cano, Altermag- netic routes to majorana modes in zero net magnetiza- tion, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 106601 (2024)

    2024

  8. [8]

    P. Rao, A. Mook, and J. Knolle, Tunable band topology and optical conductivity in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B 110, 024425 (2024)

    2024

  9. [9]

    D. S. Antonenko, R. M. Fernandes, and J. W. F. Vender- bos, Mirror chern bands and weyl nodal loops in alter- magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 096703 (2025)

    2025

  10. [10]

    Hadjipaschalis, S

    A. Hadjipaschalis, S. A. A. Ghorashi, and J. Cano, Majo- ranas with a twist: Tunable majorana zero modes in al- termagnetic heterostructures, Phys. Rev. B112, 214430 (2025)

    2025

  11. [11]

    A. B. Hellenes, T. Jungwirth, R. Jaeschke-Ubiergo, A. Chakraborty, J. Sinova, and L. ˇSmejkal, P-wave mag- nets (2024), arXiv:2309.01607 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  12. [12]

    Brekke, P

    B. Brekke, P. Sukhachov, H. G. Giil, A. Brataas, and J. Linder, Minimal models and transport properties of unconventionalp-wave magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 236703 (2024)

    2024

  13. [13]

    Dsouza, A

    R. Dsouza, A. Kreisel, B. M. Andersen, D. F. Agter- berg, and M. H. Christensen, Odd-parity magnetism in fe-based superconductors with coplanar magnetic order, Phys. Rev. B113, 144509 (2026)

    2026

  14. [14]

    C. Lee, N. A. Hackner, and P. M. R. Brydon, Incom- mensuration in odd-parity magnets, Phys. Rev. B113, 064420 (2026)

    2026

  15. [15]

    Liu, Z.-Y

    D. Liu, Z.-Y. Zhuang, D. Zhu, Z. Wu, and Z. Yan, Light- induced odd-parity altermagnets on dimerized lattices, Phys. Rev. B113, L060409 (2026)

    2026

  16. [16]

    T. Zhu, D. Zhou, H. Wang, S.-H. Wei, and J. Ruan, Floquet odd-parity collinear magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 126704 (2026)

    2026

  17. [17]

    Luo, J.-X

    X.-J. Luo, J.-X. Hu, M.-L. Hu, and K. T. Law, Spin group symmetry criteria for odd-parity magnets (2026), arXiv:2510.05512 [cond-mat.other]

    arXiv 2026

  18. [18]

    Zhuang, D

    Z.-Y. Zhuang, D. Zhu, D. Liu, Z. Wu, and Z. Yan, Odd-parity altermagnetism originated from orbital or- ders (2026), arXiv:2508.18361 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  19. [19]

    Sim and S

    G. Sim and S. Rachel, Quantum spin models of commen- suratep-wave magnets (2026), arXiv:2602.23986 [cond- mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  20. [20]

    K. R. Eikeland, S. D. Lundemo, and A. Sudbø, The fate of odd-parity magnetism in one dimension (2026), arXiv:2606.26222 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  21. [21]

    Li and P

    Y. Li and P. Sukhachov,p-wave orbital magnetism (2026), arXiv:2604.18695 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  22. [22]

    Huang, Z

    S. Huang, Z. Qin, F. Zhan, D.-H. Xu, D.-S. Ma, and R. Wang, Light-induced odd-parity magnetism in con- ventional antiferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 126703 (2026)

    2026

  23. [23]

    S. A. A. Ghorashi and Q. Li, Dynamical generation of higher-order spin-orbit coupling, topology, and persistent spin texture in light-irradiated altermagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 236702 (2025)

    2025

  24. [24]

    Schliemann, J

    J. Schliemann, J. C. Egues, and D. Loss, Nonballistic spin-field-effect transistor, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 146801 (2003). 6

    2003

  25. [25]

    B. A. Bernevig, J. Orenstein, and S.-C. Zhang, Exact su(2) symmetry and persistent spin helix in a spin-orbit coupled system, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 236601 (2006)

    2006

  26. [26]

    J. D. Koralek, C. P. Weber, J. Orenstein, B. A. Bernevig, S.-C. Zhang, S. Mack, and D. D. Awschalom, Emergence of the persistent spin helix in semiconductor quantum wells, Nature458, 610 (2009)

    2009

  27. [27]

    Schliemann, Colloquium: Persistent spin textures in semiconductor nanostructures, Rev

    J. Schliemann, Colloquium: Persistent spin textures in semiconductor nanostructures, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 011001 (2017)

    2017

  28. [28]

    J. Ji, F. Lou, R. Yu, J. S. Feng, and H. J. Xiang, Symmetry-protected full-space persistent spin texture in two-dimensional materials, Phys. Rev. B105, L041404 (2022)

    2022

  29. [29]

    Oka and H

    T. Oka and H. Aoki, Photovoltaic hall effect in graphene, Phys. Rev. B79, 081406(R) (2009)

    2009

  30. [30]

    Kitagawa, T

    T. Kitagawa, T. Oka, A. Brataas, L. Fu, and E. Dem- ler, Transport properties of nonequilibrium systems un- der the application of light: Photoinduced quantum hall insulators without landau levels, Phys. Rev. B84, 235108 (2011)

    2011

  31. [31]

    Eckardt and E

    A. Eckardt and E. Anisimovas, High-frequency approx- imation for periodically driven quantum systems from a floquet-space perspective, New Journal of Physics17, 093039 (2015)

    2015

  32. [32]

    Bukov, L

    M. Bukov, L. D’Alessio, and A. Polkovnikov, Universal high-frequency behavior of periodically driven systems: from dynamical stabilization to floquet engineering, Ad- vances in Physics64, 139 (2015)

    2015

  33. [33]

    Mikami, S

    T. Mikami, S. Kitamura, K. Yasuda, N. Tsuji, T. Oka, and H. Aoki, Brillouin-wigner theory for high-frequency expansion in periodically driven systems: Application to floquet topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B93, 144307 (2016)

    2016

  34. [34]

    Oka and S

    T. Oka and S. Kitamura, Floquet engineering of quantum materials, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 10, 387 (2019)

    2019

  35. [35]

    N. H. Lindner, G. Refael, and V. Galitski, Floquet topo- logical insulator in semiconductor quantum wells, Nature Physics7, 490 (2011)

    2011

  36. [36]

    J. W. McIver, B. Schulte, F.-U. Stein, T. Matsuyama, G. Jotzu, G. Meier, and A. Cavalleri, Light-induced anomalous hall effect in graphene, Nature Physics16, 38 (2020)

    2020

  37. [37]

    Beaurepaire, J.-C

    E. Beaurepaire, J.-C. Merle, A. Daunois, and J.-Y. Bigot, Ultrafast spin dynamics in ferromagnetic nickel, Phys. Rev. Lett.76, 4250 (1996)

    1996

  38. [38]

    C. D. Stanciu, F. Hansteen, A. V. Kimel, A. Kirilyuk, A. Tsukamoto, A. Itoh, and T. Rasing, All-optical mag- netic recording with circularly polarized light, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 047601 (2007)

    2007

  39. [39]

    Kirilyuk, A

    A. Kirilyuk, A. V. Kimel, and T. Rasing, Ultrafast optical manipulation of magnetic order, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 2731 (2010)

    2010

  40. [40]

    S. Sumi, H. Awano, and M. Hayashi, Interference induced enhancement of magneto-optical kerr effect in ultrathin magnetic films, Scientific Reports8, 776 (2018)

    2018

  41. [41]

    Z. Cao, S. Li, Y. Pan, J. Zhao, S. Ye, X. Zhang, and W. Zhao, Characterization of magnetic thin films and spintronic devices using magneto-optic kerr microscopy, Advanced Devices & Instrumentation5, 0060 (2024)

    2024

  42. [42]

    Sears, J

    J. Sears, J. Yao, Z. Hu, W. Tian, N. Aryal, W. Yin, A. M. Tsvelik, I. A. Zaliznyak, Q. Li, and J. M. Tranquada, Eu- ausb: An odd-parity helical variation of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. B112, 094455 (2025)

    2025

  43. [43]

    Y. H. Wang, H. Steinberg, P. Jarillo-Herrero, and N. Gedik, Observation of floquet-bloch states on the sur- face of a topological insulator, Science342, 453 (2013)

    2013

  44. [44]

    J.-Y. Shan, M. Ye, H. Chu, S. Lee, J.-G. Park, L. Balents, and D. Hsieh, Giant modulation of optical nonlinearity by floquet engineering, Nature600, 235 (2021)

    2021

  45. [45]

    Kobayashi, C

    Y. Kobayashi, C. Heide, A. C. Johnson, V. Tiwari, F. Liu, D. A. Reis, T. F. Heinz, and S. Ghimire, Flo- quet engineering of strongly driven excitons in monolayer tungsten disulfide, Nature Physics19, 171 (2023)

    2023

  46. [46]

    Y. Yu, M. B. Lyngby, T. Shishidou, M. Roig, A. Kreisel, M. Weinert, B. M. Andersen, and D. F. Agterberg, Odd- parity magnetism driven by antiferromagnetic exchange, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 046701 (2025)

    2025

  47. [47]

    Q. Song, S. Stavri´ c, P. Barone, A. Droghetti, D. S. An- tonenko, J. W. F. Venderbos, C. A. Occhialini, B. Ilyas, E. Erge¸ cen, N. Gedik, S.-W. Cheong, R. M. Fernandes, S. Picozzi, and R. Comin, Electrical switching of ap-wave magnet, Nature642, 64 (2025)

    2025

  48. [48]

    Kuwahara, T

    T. Kuwahara, T. Mori, and K. Saito, Floquet–magnus theory and generic transient dynamics in periodically driven many-body quantum systems, Annals of Physics 367, 96 (2016)

    2016

  49. [49]

    T. Mori, T. Kuwahara, and K. Saito, Rigorous bound on energy absorption and generic relaxation in periodically driven quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 120401 (2016)

    2016

  50. [50]

    D. A. Abanin, W. De Roeck, W. W. Ho, and F. Hu- veneers, Effective hamiltonians, prethermalization, and slow energy absorption in periodically driven many-body systems, Phys. Rev. B95, 014112 (2017). END MA TTER Lattice regularization— Here, we will discuss the lat- tice regularization schemes used in the main text. We start with the effective Hamiltonian...

    2017