Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 52 references

Machine learning based prediction of optical properties in two-dimensional Mo-W-S-Se-Te transition-metal dichalcogenide alloys through physics-informed sampling

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A tabular model, trained only on quaternary Mo–W–S–Se–Te alloys, reconstructs DFT-grade dielectric spectra (R²>0.98, MAE<0.10) and predicts binary, ternary, and quinary compositions with no in-context examples.

desk verdict Useful, plausible ML-DFT screening paper for TMD alloys, but the one-supercell-per-composition assumption and a few reporting gaps need fixing before I'd trust the numbers. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.21246 v1 pith:EOY4EZMP submitted 2026-07-23 cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.app-phphysics.comp-phphysics.data-an

Vivek Chowdhury , Tarvir Anjum Aditto , Md. Samrat , Hafiz Imtiaz , Ahmed Zubair This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.app-phphysics.comp-phphysics.data-an
keywords two-dimensionalTMDalloysdielectricfunctionoptical-propertypredictionTabPFNin-contextlearningphysics-informedsamplingdensityfunctionaltheorycomposition-propertymapping
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that the frequency-dependent optical response of two-dimensional Mo–W–S–Se–Te transition-metal dichalcogenide (TMD) alloys can be predicted from composition alone, without a fresh DFT calculation for every new stoichiometry. Using a tabular foundation model that learns in-context from a small table of DFT-computed dielectric spectra, plus a non-uniform energy sampling scheme that concentrates points where interband absorption is strongest, the authors report that quaternary-trained models reproduce held-out quaternary spectra with R²>0.98 and MAE<0.10, and generalize with zero in-context examples to binary, ternary, and quinary alloys, with quinary R²>0.97. If correct, this replaces combinatorial first-principles optical screening with a single forward pass, yielding refractive index, extinction coefficient, and absorption coefficient for device design across a broad alloy space.

What carries the argument

The central object is TabPFN, a prior-data fitted transformer that performs in-context learning: rather than gradient-training on the target dataset, it takes the DFT-computed training rows as a context table and produces predictions for query rows in a single forward pass, with attention across samples and across features. Because its context is capped near 10,000 rows, the paper introduces a physics-informed energy subsampling scheme: each material contributes 330 energy points, with 10 below the band gap, 250 in the optically active window from the gap to max(10 eV, 3×gap), and 70 in the high-energy tail. With 25 quaternary training materials this yields about 8,250 rows. The four dielect

What would settle it

Compute DFT dielectric spectra for at least three independently randomized 4×4×1 supercells of one quaternary composition (for example Mo10W6S13Te19). If the spread among those single-configuration spectra is comparable to or larger than the claimed MAE<0.10, then the reported accuracy is measuring agreement with one random configuration, not with the alloy's representative optical response, and the central claim would not survive.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's discovery is that a composition-only feature vector—the atomic fractions of Mo, W, S, Se, and Te plus the photon energy—is sufficient input for a pre-trained tabular transformer to emulate DFT-level dielectric spectra across a five-element TMD alloy space. Training exclusively on 25 quaternary compositions, subsampled to 330 energy points per material via a physics-informed grid, the model reproduces the real and imaginary parts of the in-plane and out-of-plane dielectric functions of held-out quaternary alloys with R²>0.98 and MAE<0.10, and—without ever seeing binary, ternary, or quinary rows in context—predicts those families as well, with quinary predictions

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that one randomly substituted 4×4×1 supercell per composition is a faithful representative of that alloy's optical response; if different random configurations of the same composition give materially different dielectric spectra, the DFT labels and every reported accuracy figure are noise around an uncharacterized configurational average.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A composition-only descriptor plus a physics-informed energy grid is sufficient for a tabular foundation model to reconstruct DFT-quality dielectric spectra of quaternary TMD alloys (R²>0.98, MAE<0.10).
  • Zero-shot transfer works across alloy order: binary and ternary predictions reach R²≈0.82–0.90 and quinary predictions exceed R²=0.97, so combinatorial screening of higher-order alloys becomes feasible without new DFT data.
  • Refractive index, extinction coefficient, and absorption coefficient follow directly from the predicted dielectric components, giving device-relevant quantities without additional first-principles runs.
  • Deployment reduces to one forward pass with no gradient-based training or hyperparameter search, making cheap optical screening repeatable as new compositions are proposed.
  • The authors' proposed workflow—small reference set for a target family, in-context prediction across candidates, DFT validation only on the short list—would concentrate DFT cost on the most promising compositions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An implication the paper leaves implicit: because each composition is represented by one random alloy configuration, the reported R² and MAE conflate learning error with configurational variance; a decisive follow-up is to average DFT spectra over several random configurations and retrain, checking whether accuracy improves or the error bars absorb the current gap.
  • A testable extension of the subsampling argument: hold the 330-point budget fixed but replace the physics-informed grid with uniform sampling over 0–33 eV; if R² degrades markedly, the case for physics-informed sampling is confirmed; if not, most of the credit belongs to the model prior.
  • The paper's own Appendix C notes that binary and quinary zero-shot spectra sometimes fail to separate closely spaced peaks; a natural next step is to seed the context with a handful of binary and quinary rows and measure how much fine-structure fidelity improves.
  • Because the descriptor is strictly compositional plus photon energy, the same recipe is portable to other 2D alloy families; a quick check would be to apply it to a held-out chalcogen or metal pair not in Mo–W–S–Se–Te.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper builds a dataset of 99 monolayer Mo–W–S–Se–Te TMD alloy structures (binary, ternary, quaternary, quinary) and computes their DFT-level dielectric functions along in-plane and out-of-plane directions. It then trains TabPFN, a tabular foundation model, using only element fractions and photon energy as features, with a physics-informed energy subsampling strategy that allocates 330 points per material (10 sub-gap, 250 active, 70 tail) to fit within TabPFN's in-context limit. Trained exclusively on 25 quaternary alloys, the model is reported to reconstruct held-out quaternary spectra with R2 > 0.98 and MAE < 0.10 for all four components, outperforming Extra Trees and XGBoost, and to generalize zero-shot to binary, ternary, and quinary alloys, with quinary predictions reaching R2 > 0.97. The paper also derives refractive index, extinction coefficient, and absorption coefficient from the predicted dielectric functions.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper makes a useful contribution: it demonstrates that a composition-only feature representation plus photon energy, fed to a pretrained tabular transformer, can emulate DFT-level dielectric spectra across a broad TMD alloy space without task-specific training. The holdout design is a genuine generalization test, not circular: the model weights are frozen and the test spectra are held-out DFT calculations. The paper also ships a transparent subsampling budget and compares against standard tree-based baselines. The main significance is the zero-shot claim: a model trained only on quaternary compositions predicting quinary alloys with R2 > 0.97 would be practically valuable for screening. However, the single-configuration-per-composition dataset and the inconsistent reporting of MAE units currently leave the strength of the quantitative claims uncertain.

major comments (3)
  1. [Computational Details, 'Supercell Construction and Alloying'; Appendix A] The dataset uses one random 4x4x1 supercell per composition. The text states atoms are 'randomly substituted' and a single 'representative atomic configuration' is used without enumerating inequivalent arrangements. No check is reported that different random configurations yield similar dielectric spectra; Appendix A verifies only total-energy convergence with k-point density, not configurational convergence of optical properties. Since the regression targets are these single-configuration DFT spectra, the reported MAE (<0.10) may be smaller than the configurational scatter of the target. This is load-bearing for the claim that composition fractions plus photon energy suffice. Please compute multiple independent configurations for a representative subset (e.g., 3–5 compositions across quaternary and quinary), report spectral standard deviations, and either average labels or qualify the c
  2. [Figure 6 caption; Table 3 caption; Abstract] There is a direct conflict about the units of MAE for the imaginary components. Figure 6's caption says MAE for εx2 and εz2 is 'reported in log-transformed units,' while Table 3's caption says MAE values are 'in the original linear scale.' The abstract states MAE <0.10 for all four dielectric components without qualification. A log-scale MAE of 0.10 is not comparable to a linear-scale MAE; it corresponds approximately to multiplicative errors in ε2. Report all MAE values in a single identifiable unit, ideally back-transformed to the physical ε2 scale, and correct the abstract and table.
  3. [Results and Discussion, 'Generalization across compositions beyond training data'; Appendix C] The zero-shot claim should be qualified. Table 3 shows binary and ternary R2 values of 0.82–0.90 and MAE 0.15–0.25, which is substantially weaker than the quaternary interpolation performance; Appendix C concedes degraded predictions for binary and quinary materials. The abstract highlights only quinary (R2>0.97), which is accurate, but the unqualified sentence in the text 'generalized in a zero-shot manner to binary, ternary, and quinary alloys' may be misread as uniformly high accuracy. Please state the performance by family and temper the interpretive claim that the model 'learned transferable, physically meaningful compositional representations' based on this evidence.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Title and figure labels] Typographical issues: the title contains 'T e' instead of 'Te'; 'xGBoost' appears with inconsistent capitalization; several figure labels contain the literal string 'uni00A0' instead of a space. Please run a final proofreading pass.
  2. [Evaluation Metrics, Eq. (24)] The text says 'R2 score ranges from 0 to 1,' but R2 can be negative for predictions worse than the mean. The formula is standard, but the prose should be corrected.
  3. [Figure 2 caption] The phrase 'Zero set uses data of only one composition for initializing' is unclear. What is initialized? In TabPFN there is no training, so 'initializing' needs explanation or removal.
  4. [Subsampling Strategy, Table 1] The energy subsampling budget (10/250/70 points) and the boundary max(10 eV, 3Eg) are presented as fixed choices without sensitivity analysis. A short ablation showing that nearby budgets give similar results would make the method appear less ad hoc.
  5. [Introduction] The claim that 'no prior work has predicted the optical properties of TMD alloys' is strong. The cited Barhoumi et al. work predicts absorption spectra, and there is a broader ML-for-spectra literature. Please sharpen the novelty statement to distinguish spectral prediction as a function of composition from the current work.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation found; central benchmark is external and the only self-citation is non-load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's prediction chain is externally benchmarked: DFT-computed dielectric spectra of 99 alloys are the labels, and TabPFN is evaluated on 7 held-out quaternary alloys plus binary/ternary/quinary alloys absent from the in-context set, with R2/MAE computed against held-out DFT spectra. TabPFN's weights are frozen pretrained parameters and no task-specific parameter is fitted to the dielectric function, so no fitted input is renamed as a prediction. The physics-informed subsampling uses the DFT band gap Eg only to choose the density of training energy points (Table 1: 10 sub-gap, 250 active, 70 tail); Eg is not an input feature and is not the regression target, so this is a sampling design rather than a circular reduction. Derived quantities n, k, alpha are deterministic post-processing of predicted epsilon via Eqs. 17-20, not an independent prediction target. The only relevant self-citation (ref 21, authors' prior Extra Trees band-edge work) is background motivation and is not used to justify the central claim; no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from it. The single-random-supercell-per-composition protocol is an unverified configurational-averaging assumption and a data-quality limitation, but it does not make the prediction equal to its input. Appendix C's concession that zero-shot binary/quinary predictions 'degraded slightly' and 'often struggle to distinguish closely spaced peaks' further confirms the benchmark is not forced. Thus no circular step can be exhibited by quote-and-reduction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a small number of hand-chosen sampling parameters and on the domain assumptions that single random supercells represent alloys and that PBE-level dielectric functions are adequate targets. No new physical entities are introduced. The free parameters are sampling choices rather than physical constants, and they directly affect the in-context training set for TabPFN.

free parameters (2)
  • Energy subsampling point allocation (10 sub-gap / 250 active / 70 tail) = 10, 250, 70 points per material (330 total)
    Hand-chosen budget in Table 1. It controls which in-context rows TabPFN sees and is not cross-validated; changing the allocation could change reported performance.
  • Active-region boundary max(10 eV, 3Eg) = 10 eV floor and factor 3
    Defines the optically active window for dense sampling. The 10 eV floor and the factor 3 are ad hoc choices, not derived from data or a uniqueness argument.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption PBE-GGA independent-particle dielectric function (Eq. 15) adequately represents the optical response of these alloys
    The paper uses PBE-GGA without excitonic effects or GW corrections and validates predictions only against the same DFT level. The underlying assumption is that this level of theory is a sufficient target for the ML model.
  • domain assumption One random substitutional configuration per composition is representative of the alloy
    Structures are generated by random substitution without configurational averaging or SQS. The central claim depends on these single configurations being representative of the alloy's optical response.
  • domain assumption TabPFN's synthetic-data prior transfers to DFT materials spectra
    TabPFN was meta-trained on synthetic tabular datasets. The paper assumes this prior is useful for composition-energy-dielectric regression tasks in materials science.
  • standard math Kramers-Kronig transformation and derived optical formulas (Eqs. 16-20) are valid
    The real part of the dielectric function is obtained from the imaginary part via Kramers-Kronig, and n, k, alpha are derived by standard relations. These are accepted mathematical identities, not fitted.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Machine learning based prediction of optical properties in two-dimensional Mo-W-S-Se-Te transition-metal dichalcogenide alloys through physics-informed sampling." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EOY4EZMP

@misc{pith2026260721246,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Machine learning based prediction of optical properties in two-dimensional Mo-W-S-Se-Te transition-metal dichalcogenide alloys through physics-informed sampling},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EOY4EZMP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.21246}
}
read the original abstract

Two-dimensional transition-metal dichalcogenide (TMD) alloys provide a compositionally tunable platform for controlling the optical and electronic properties. However, systematic prediction of their dielectric response across multicomponent alloy spaces remains challenging owing to the combinatorial cost of first-principles calculations. In this work, we combined ab initio optical-property calculations with a tabular foundation-model regression to predict the real and imaginary components of the frequency-dependent dielectric function for Mo-W-S-Se-Te TMD alloys. A dataset of 99 alloy structures spanning binary, ternary, quaternary, and quinary compositions was generated using density functional theory (DFT). The resulting polarization-dependent dielectric spectra were used to train a tabular prior-fitted network (TabPFN) and evaluated against the conventional Extra Trees and XGBoost models. To accommodate the in-context capacity limit of TabPFN, we introduced a non-uniform, physics-informed energy subsampling strategy that concentrates sampling in the optically active region above the band gap, where interband absorption is strongest. Trained solely on quaternary alloys, our TabPFN reconstructed the dielectric spectra of held-out quaternary compositions with an R2 > 0.98 and a mean absolute error below 0.10 for all four dielectric components, outperforming both baselines while requiring no gradient-based training or hyperparameter tuning. Our model further predicted derived optical quantities, including refractive index, extinction coefficient, and absorption coefficient. Additionally, our model generalized in a zero-shot manner to binary, ternary, and quinary alloys absent from the training set, with quinary predictions achieving an R2 > 0.97.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.21246 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Binary WSe2 represented by the W4Se8 supercell, (b) metal-alloyed ternary W3Mo13Te32 (W0.1875Mo0.8125Te2), (c) quaternary W13Mo3S13Te19 (W0.8125Mo0.1875S0.8125Te1.1875), and (d) quinary W13Mo3S4Se24Te4 (W0.8125Mo0.1875S0.25Se1.5Te0.25) alloy structures. The color legend identifies W, Mo, S, Se, and Te atoms, and the coordinate axes indicate the in-plane and out-of-plane directions. (e) Real and imaginary compone… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Effect of in-context learning set size on TabPFN prediction performance. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) The overview of TabPFN pre-training and inference. (b) Attention mechanism [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Smart energy subsampling illustrated for two quaternary Mo–W–Se–Te compounds [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison of DFT-computed (black dashed) and predicted (solid) dielectric [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Comparison of R2 (a) and MAE (b) for TabPFN, XGBoost, and Extra Trees across the four dielectric function components: ε x 1 , ε x 2 , ε z 1 , and ε z 2 . TabPFN achieves the highest R2 and lowest MAE in almost all cases. (MAE for ε x 2 and ε z 2 is reported in log-tran…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Model-predicted dielectric vs DFT computed dielectric function components across [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: TabPFN-predicted (red solid) vs. DFT-computed (black dashed) dielectric [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Zero-shot TabPFN predictions (red solid) vs. DFT-computed (black dashed) di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Zeitschrift f

    First principles methods using CASTEP , author=. Zeitschrift f. 2005 , publisher=

    2005

  2. [2]

    The Journal of chemical physics , volume=

    Assessment of the Perdew--Burke--Ernzerhof exchange-correlation functional , author=. The Journal of chemical physics , volume=. 1999 , publisher=

    1999

  3. [3]

    Mathematical programming , volume=

    On the limited memory BFGS method for large scale optimization , author=. Mathematical programming , volume=. 1989 , publisher=

    1989

  4. [4]

    Accurate predictions on small data with a tabular foundation model , journal =

    Hollmann, Noah and M. Accurate predictions on small data with a tabular foundation model , journal =. 2025 , month = jan, doi =

    2025

  5. [5]

    Transformers Can Do

    M. Transformers Can Do. International Conference on Learning Representations , year =

  6. [6]

    Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning , pages =

    Statistical Foundations of Prior-Data Fitted Networks , author =. Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning , pages =. 2023 , editor =

    2023

  7. [7]

    Position: The Future of

    M\". Position: The Future of. Proceedings of the 42nd International Conference on Machine Learning , pages =. 2025 , editor =

    2025

  8. [8]

    Sreeram Reddy Gundeti and Jagadesh Kumar Jatavallabhula and Bridjesh Pappula and Seshibe Makgato , keywords =. Data-driven prognosis of root mean square deviation in reverse-engineered freeform surfaces: A comparative study of support vector, Gaussian process and extreme gradient boosting regressions , journal =. 2026 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016...

    arXiv 2026

Show all 52 references
  1. [9]

    Zhang, Jianan and Koneru, Aditya and Sankaranarayanan, Subramanian K. R. S. and Lilley, Carmen M. , journal =. Graph Neural Network Guided Evolutionary Search of Grain Boundaries in. 2023 , month =. doi:10.1021/acsami.3c01161 , publisher =

    2023 doi

  2. [10]

    Neural network prediction of the effect of thermomechanical controlled processing on mechanical properties , journal =

    Sushant Sinha and Denzel Guye and Xiaoping Ma and Kashif Rehman and Stephen Yue and Narges Armanfard , keywords =. Neural network prediction of the effect of thermomechanical controlled processing on mechanical properties , journal =. 2024 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016...

    2024

  3. [11]

    Wang and X

    T. Wang and X. Tan and Y. Wei and H. Jin , title =. Nanoscale , year =

  4. [12]

    Machine learning-enabled prediction of the electronic band-edge shapes and properties of

    Aditto, Tarvir Anjum and Chowdhury, Vivek and Imtiaz, Hafiz and Zubair, Ahmed , journal =. Machine learning-enabled prediction of the electronic band-edge shapes and properties of. 2026 , month =. doi:10.1039/D5MA01485A , publisher =

    2026 doi

  5. [13]

    T. H. Nguyen and L. H. Nguyen and T. N. Truong , title =. ACS Omega , year =

  6. [14]

    Nanoscale Advances , volume =

    Predicting the mechanical properties of pristine and defective carbon nanotubes using a random forest model , author =. Nanoscale Advances , volume =. 2024 , month =. doi:10.1039/d4na00405a , publisher =

    2024 doi

  7. [15]

    Physical Review Materials , volume =

    Predicting phase preferences of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides using machine learning , author =. Physical Review Materials , volume =. 2022 , doi =

    2022

  8. [16]

    and Zhang, Y

    Jia, X. and Zhang, Y. and Liu, J. and Wang, H. , title =. J. Mater. Chem. A , year =

  9. [17]

    Siddiqui and N

    A. Siddiqui and N. D. M. Hine , title =. npj Comput. Mater. , year =

  10. [18]

    Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics , year =

    Machine learning–enabled band gap prediction of monolayer transition metal chalcogenide alloys , author =. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics , year =

  11. [19]

    ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces , pages =

    High-Throughput Computational Study and Machine Learning Prediction of Electronic Properties in Transition Metal Dichalcogenide/Two-Dimensional Layered Halide Perovskite Heterostructures , author =. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces , pages =. 2024 , doi =

    2024

  12. [20]

    E. T. Chenebuah , title =. Mater. Data Energy , year =

  13. [21]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume =

    Why do tree-based models still outperform deep learning on typical tabular data? , author =. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume =. 2022 , publisher =

    2022

  14. [22]

    Chemical Science , volume =

    Machine learning of optical properties of materials -- predicting spectra from images and images from spectra , author =. Chemical Science , volume =. 2019 , doi =

    2019

  15. [23]

    and Hossain, Muhammad Minoar , journal =

    Khatun, M.R. and Hossain, Muhammad Minoar , journal =. Efficient prediction of optical properties in hexagonal. 2024 , doi =

    2024

  16. [24]

    Optical Materials , volume =

    Machine learning density prediction and optical properties of calcium boro-zinc glasses , author =. Optical Materials , volume =. 2022 , doi =

    2022

  17. [25]

    Computational Materials Science , volume =

    Machine learning regression model for predicting the band gap of multi-elements nonlinear optical crystals , author =. Computational Materials Science , volume =. 2024 , doi =

    2024

  18. [26]

    Environment, Development and Sustainability , volume =

    Identification of the best model to predict optical properties of water , author =. Environment, Development and Sustainability , volume =. 2023 , doi =

    2023

  19. [27]

    Advanced Science , volume =

    Machine-learning-assisted accurate prediction of molecular optical properties upon aggregation , author =. Advanced Science , volume =. 2022 , doi =

    2022

  20. [28]

    Small , volume =

    Optical properties prediction for red and near-infrared emitting carbon dots using machine learning , author =. Small , volume =. 2024 , doi =

    2024

  21. [29]

    ACS Applied Optical Materials , volume =

    Machine learning-enabled optical property prediction of thin films using spectral data extraction from scientific literature , author =. ACS Applied Optical Materials , volume =. 2025 , doi =

    2025

  22. [30]

    Scientific Reports , volume =

    Enhanced prediction and optimization of thin metal film optical properties using optimized ensemble learning models , author =. Scientific Reports , volume =. 2025 , doi =

    2025

  23. [31]

    Journal of the Optical Society of America B , year =

    Machine learning techniques for predicting the optical properties of a biosensor , author =. Journal of the Optical Society of America B , year =

  24. [32]

    Machine learning-driven exploration of optoelectronic properties in 2D SrFBr: First-principles insights and precise absorption modeling , journal =

    Mohamed Barhoumi and Nabil Zeiri and Mohamed E. Machine learning-driven exploration of optoelectronic properties in 2D SrFBr: First-principles insights and precise absorption modeling , journal =. 2026 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2025.110154 , url =

    2026

  25. [33]

    DIGITAL HEALTH , volume =

    Shidian Zhu and Hui Zhang and Yanlin Liu and Wenyu Bu and Qiang Wu and Jin Wang and Wandi Chen and Qiannong Wu and Zhirong Geng and Fuming Liu , title =. DIGITAL HEALTH , volume =. 2025 , doi =

    2025

  26. [34]

    2026 , issn =

    Evaluating TabPFN for regression tasks in solar energy meteorology , journal =. 2026 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2026.114472 , url =

    2026

  27. [35]

    A Neural Algorithm Approach to Turbine Floor Noise Prediction Based on TabPFN , year=

    Chen, Haitian , booktitle=. A Neural Algorithm Approach to Turbine Floor Noise Prediction Based on TabPFN , year=

  28. [36]

    2016 , isbn =

    Chen, Tianqi and Guestrin, Carlos , title =. 2016 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/2939672.2939785 , booktitle =

    2016

  29. [37]

    Machine Learning , volume =

    Geurts, Pierre and Ernst, Damien and Wehenkel, Louis , title =. Machine Learning , volume =. 2006 , publisher =

    2006

  30. [38]

    Nano Research , volume=

    Valleytronics in transition metal dichalcogenides materials , author=. Nano Research , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  31. [39]

    Science , volume=

    Electrically switchable chiral light-emitting transistor , author=. Science , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  32. [40]

    Nature Reviews Materials , volume=

    Excitonic devices with van der Waals heterostructures: valleytronics meets twistronics , author=. Nature Reviews Materials , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  33. [41]

    Nature Nanotechnology , volume=

    Optoelectronic devices based on electrically tunable p--n diodes in a monolayer dichalcogenide , author=. Nature Nanotechnology , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  34. [42]

    Nature Electronics , volume=

    Critical challenges in the development of electronics based on two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides , author=. Nature Electronics , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  35. [43]

    Quantum-engineered devices based on 2

    Pal, Arnab and Zhang, Shuo and Chavan, Tanmay and Agashiwala, Kunjesh and Yeh, Chao-Hui and Cao, Wei and Banerjee, Kaustav , journal=. Quantum-engineered devices based on 2. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  36. [44]

    All-Optical Ultrafast Valley Switching in Two-Dimensional Materials , author =. Phys. Rev. Appl. , volume =. 2023 , month =

    2023

  37. [45]

    Floquet valley-polarized quantum anomalous Hall state in nonmagnetic heterobilayers , author =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2022 , month =

    2022

  38. [46]

    Reports on Progress in Physics , volume=

    Enhanced light--matter interaction in two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides , author=. Reports on Progress in Physics , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  39. [47]

    Journal of Materials Chemistry A , volume=

    Flexible electronics based on 2D transition metal dichalcogenides , author=. Journal of Materials Chemistry A , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  40. [48]

    ACS photonics , volume=

    Optical constants of several multilayer transition metal dichalcogenides measured by spectroscopic ellipsometry in the 300--1700 nm range: high index, anisotropy, and hyperbolicity , author=. ACS photonics , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  41. [49]

    Nanomaterials , volume=

    Progress on two-dimensional transitional metal dichalcogenides alloy materials: growth, characterisation, and optoelectronic applications , author=. Nanomaterials , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  42. [50]

    Journal of Materials Chemistry C , volume=

    Progress in photodetector devices utilizing transition metal dichalcogenides , author=. Journal of Materials Chemistry C , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  43. [51]

    Materials Advances , volume=

    Advancements in transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs) for self-powered photodetectors: challenges, properties, and functionalization strategies , author=. Materials Advances , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  44. [52]

    Light: Science & Applications , volume=

    Nonvolatile electrical switching of optical and valleytronic properties of interlayer excitons , author=. Light: Science & Applications , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.