Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 44 references

In near-extremal holographic black holes, all high-order pole-skipping points collapse onto a discrete near-horizon spectrum as temperature vanishes.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 07:36 UTC pith:HFZY3KSI

load-bearing objection The n-independent collapse of high-order pole-skipping in the extremal limit is real; scope and presentation issues, not the core argument, are what need fixing. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.21386 v1 pith:HFZY3KSI submitted 2026-07-23 hep-th gr-qc

High-Order Pole-Skipping in Near-Extremal Holography

Xiang Li , Haiming Yuan , Xian-Hui Ge This is my paper
classification hep-th gr-qc PACS 11.25.Tq04.70.-s
keywords pole-skippingnear-extremal black holesAdS2/CFT1holographic Green's functionsnear-horizon geometryinfrared conformal dimensionDyonic Gubser–Rocha modelFrobenius expansion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper claims that in near-extremal holographic black holes, the entire tower of high-order pole-skipping points collapses as temperature T→0: the n-th order pole-skipping momentum k²_{n,q} becomes independent of the order n, depending only on the mode index q and on near-horizon geometry. This collapse arises because the near-horizon recursion matrix acquires a temperature-graded structure—superdiagonal entries vanish linearly with T—so its determinant factorizes into a product of diagonal elements. The paper further shows that the mode index q equals the IR conformal dimension Δ_IR=q of a scalar in the emergent AdS2 throat, giving a concrete physical meaning to subleading pole-skipping points. If correct, this makes high-order pole-skipping analytically accessible and reorganizes the low-temperature holographic Green's function around a single near-horizon spectrum.

Core claim

The central claim is the n-independence of pole-skipping momenta in the extremal limit: as T→0, k²_{n,q} → k²_q = −m²h(r_h) + ½ q(q−1) h(r_h)f″(r_h), independent of the order n. The paper derives this from a temperature-graded hierarchy in the near-horizon Frobenius expansion: at the Matsubara frequencies ω_n = −i2πTn, the superdiagonal elements of the recursion matrix are O(T), so the determinant factorizes as det M^(n) = ∏_{σ=1}^n M^(0)_{σσ} + O(T). Setting the q-th diagonal factor to zero yields the formula. Substituting into the effective AdS2 mass relation gives m²_eff L²_2 = q(q−1), identifying the mode index with the IR conformal dimension Δ_IR=q in the emergent AdS2/CFT1 duality. The

What carries the argument

The temperature-graded recursion matrix of the near-horizon radial equation. In ingoing Eddington–Finkelstein coordinates, expanding a scalar field around the horizon yields a recursion matrix M(ω,k²). At the Matsubara frequencies ω_n=−i2πTn, the superdiagonal entries M_{j,j+1}=2πT(j−n) vanish linearly with T while diagonal entries retain O(T⁰) near-horizon contributions. A Leibniz-expansion argument then shows the n×n determinant factorizes into the product of its diagonal elements plus O(T), reducing the n-th-order pole-skipping condition to M^{(0)}_{qq}=0 for a single q. This mechanism converts an intractable determinant into a simple algebraic condition.

Load-bearing premise

The collapse depends on the near-horizon quantities h(r_h) and f″(r_h) staying finite and nonzero as T→0—i.e., a smooth extremal limit with a genuine AdS2 throat—which the paper itself notes fails for BTZ and planar AdS-Schwarzschild black holes, where the horizon becomes an irregular singular point.

What would settle it

Compute pole-skipping momenta at several orders n for a near-extremal black hole with a smooth extremal limit and extrapolate the T→0 intercepts; the paper predicts that for fixed q, all orders share exactly the same k²_q. Any leading-order n-dependence in those intercepts—or failure of the determinant to become upper-bidiagonal—would falsify the collapse. A concrete alternative test: take a solution with h(r_h)→0 or f″(r_h)→0 at extremality and verify that the factorization of det M^(n) breaks down, leaving n-dependent momenta.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • High-order pole-skipping points become analytically computable in near-extremal black holes, well beyond the low orders accessible to standard determinant methods.
  • The mode index q acquires a physical interpretation as the infrared conformal dimension Δ_IR=q in the emergent AdS2/CFT1 throat, connecting pole-skipping to quantum criticality.
  • As T→0, the retarded Green's function's pole-skipping skeleton 'forgets' the bulk geometry and is organized by a single discrete near-horizon spectrum, with all Matsubara frequencies sharing the same momenta.
  • The leading pole-skipping momenta grow linearly with order, k_{n,n} ∝ n, with the slope set by the ratio of the transverse scale to the AdS2 radius.
  • Leading temperature corrections are linear in T and n-dependent (k²_{n,q} = k²_q + C_{n,q}T), lifting the extremal degeneracy, and can be expressed in terms of thermodynamic quantities such as entropy density and an extremal specific-heat scale.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the identification Δ_IR=q holds for scalar fields, one might expect a similar near-horizon collapse for fermionic or vector probes; if so, the same temperature-graded factorization could yield a universal classification of pole-skipping spectra across matter content.
  • The nT regime (large n at fixed T) is left open by the paper; a resummation of corrections in nT could extend the collapse formula to a crossover temperature, possibly connecting to the Schwarzian mode that governs the near-AdS2 dynamics.
  • The thermodynamic rewriting of the spectrum suggests a practical diagnostic: low-temperature boundary correlators might be used to extract the near-horizon thermodynamic data (entropy density and extremal specific-heat scale) from the position of pole-skipping points alone.
  • If the collapse persists under higher-order temperature corrections, the pole-skipping spectrum could serve as a clean numerical order parameter for detecting the emergence of AdS2 physics in models that lack an analytic extremal solution.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a near-extremal expansion for high-order pole-skipping of a bulk scalar in holographic black holes. Working at the Matsubara frequencies ω_n = −i2πTn, the authors observe that the near-horizon recursion matrix has a temperature-graded structure: diagonal and lower entries are O(1), superdiagonal entries are O(T), and higher superdiagonals vanish. A Leibniz argument then yields the factorization det M^{(n)} = ∏ M^{(0)}_{σσ} + O(T) (Eq. (31)), so that in the T→0 limit the pole-skipping condition reduces to a product of diagonal factors. This gives the central formula k^2_{n,q} = −m^2 h(r_h) + (1/2)q(q−1)h(r_h)f″(r_h) (Eq. (33)), independent of the order n. Using the AdS2 mass relation (Eq. (13)), the mode index is identified with the IR conformal dimension Δ_IR = q. The authors compute the leading O(T) correction (Eq. (42)), express the result in thermodynamic variables, verify the predictions numerically in the Dyonic Gubser–Rocha model with very high claimed precision, and discuss the consistency with BTZ/AdS-Schwarzschild.

Significance. If the central claim holds, it is a substantial advance: high-order pole-skipping, normally requiring large determinants, becomes analytically tractable in the near-extremal regime and collapses to an n-independent spectrum set by near-horizon data. The identification of the mode index with an AdS2/CFT1 scaling dimension is a clean physical interpretation, and the paper provides a simple, falsifiable formula that can be tested in other holographic models. The main technical derivation (the Leibniz argument leading to Eq. (31)) is sound and independent of the bulk geometry beyond the assumed AdS2 double-zero structure. The authors are also explicit about the domain of validity (Sec. II F), noting that geometries without a smooth extremal limit are outside. The numerical cross-checks, if reproducible, strongly support the extremal-limit formula. However, as detailed below, the treatment of the leading temperature correction and the consistency check in Sec. II F are not reliable as written, and the numerical verification cannot currently be reproduced.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. II E / Eq. (43); Appendix B] The linear temperature correction coefficient C_{n,q} is not derived consistently. In Eq. (43), the factors M^{(0)}_{q,q+1} and M^{(0)}_{q-1,q} do not exist: the superdiagonal entries of M at ω_n are pure O(T), so their O(T^0) parts vanish. In Appendix B, Eq. (B6) contains the term (M^0_{q+1,q+1} M^0_{q+1,q}) / M^1_{q,q+1}, which is O(1/T) rather than O(1), and the boundary term uses M^1_{q-1,q} (a superdiagonal quantity) where the transposition argument requires the subdiagonal M^0_{q,q-1}. The explicit expression Eq. (B7) does not follow from the displayed equations. Since Eq. (42) is a central quantitative claim verified numerically in Table II, the authors must provide a correct, self-consistent derivation and state exactly which formula was used to produce the 'analytic' columns.
  2. [Sec. II F] The consistency check claims that the method 'reproduces the known results λ_L = 2πT and v_B^2 = d/2(d−1)' in BTZ and planar AdS-Schwarzschild. However, this paper analyzes a massive Klein–Gordon scalar; the Lyapunov exponent and butterfly velocity are properties of the gravitational sound/energy-density channel, which is not computed anywhere in the manuscript. If the statement refers to the first scalar pole-skipping point, it should be rephrased; if the sound channel is intended, the derivation must be shown. As written, this assertion is unsupported and should not be presented as a successful consistency check.
  3. [Appendix A] The alternative derivation in Appendix A is internally inconsistent. Eq. (A10) contains Φ_{n−1} on the right-hand side where the argument requires the coefficient of Φ_0 to vanish; Eqs. (A11) and (A15) are contradictory; the notion of 'two independent parameters (Φ_0, Φ_n)' is not defined; and Eq. (A16) claims an upper bidiagonal form that contradicts Eq. (30), where all below-diagonal entries are O(T^0). The main-text Leibniz proof of Eq. (31) is sufficient and clean; Appendix A should be corrected or removed so that the key factorization is not obscured by an erroneous alternative derivation.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. III B / Table II] The numerical verification claims relative errors down to 10^−29 with 100-digit precision, but no algorithm, code, or data are provided. At minimum, the authors should describe how the determinant roots are computed and tracked in T, which precision library is used, and how r_h, h(r_h), and f″(r_h) are evaluated in the extremal limit.
  2. [Sec. IV] The claim that curves k^2_{n+j,n}(T) for different n 'intersect at a common temperature' is presented as a structural feature, but no analytic formula for the intersection temperature is given. Please either derive it or describe it as an empirical observation of Fig. 7.
  3. [General notation] The notation in Eq. (22) and the later decomposition (27) is confusing: the superdiagonal entries are written as (2jπT − iω) in Eq. (22), then become 2πT(j−n) after substituting ω_n, but the text sometimes refers to them as M^{(0)}_{j,j+1}. Please introduce M^0 and M^1 only for objects that actually have O(1) and O(T) parts, and use separate symbols for the superdiagonal coefficients.
  4. [Abstract / Sec. II F] The abstract and introduction emphasize universality, but Sec. II F explicitly excludes BTZ and planar AdS-Schwarzschild because the horizon becomes an irregular singular point. A sentence in the abstract or introduction stating the restriction to backgrounds with a smooth extremal limit and O(1) near-horizon data would help set expectations.
  5. [References] Several references are missing year/volume/page information (e.g., refs. [7,8,10,11,17,18,21]) and some arXiv identifiers are absent. Please bring the bibliography into journal style.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: Eq. (33) is derived from an internal Leibniz-expansion factorization and independently corroborated by full-determinant numerics.

full rationale

The paper's central formula (33) is not fitted or assumed. It follows from the explicitly proven factorization `det M^(n)(ω_n,k²) = ∏_{σ=1}^n M^(0)_{σσ} + O(T)` (Eq. 31), justified in Sec. II C by the Leibniz argument that every non-identity permutation must use at least one O(T) superdiagonal element. The diagonal elements M^(0)_{jj} (Eq. 28) are read off from the near-horizon Klein-Gordon recursion, so the roots k²_q solve algebraic equations involving only model inputs m², h(r_h), and f''(r_h). The paper then checks Eq. (33) against numerical solutions of the full determinant condition in the Dyonic Gubser-Rocha model; Table II reports relative errors at the 10^-29-10^-15 level for both intercepts and slopes, i.e., an independent computational cross-check rather than a redeclaration of inputs. The identification Δ_IR = q in Eq. (40) is obtained by substituting Eq. (33) into the AdS2 mass/IR-dimension relations (12)-(13); it is a derived mapping, not a definition of q. Self-citations (e.g., refs [11,19,20,21,23,34]) provide background or specify the test model, and no load-bearing step invokes a self-citation as authority. The restriction to black holes with smooth extremal limits and nonzero h(r_h), f''(r_h) is stated explicitly (Secs. II C and II F), so the domain of validity is not smuggled in. No circular step was identified.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

No parameters are fitted: all inputs (scalar mass, metric data h(r_h), f″(r_h), model couplings β, ρ, n_eff) are fixed by the model. The central claim rests on the smooth-extremal AdS2 throat assumption and on the scalar-field restriction; the Δ_IR=q identification is a re-interpretation of the same algebraic condition rather than a new entity.

axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Pole-skipping points are correctly determined by det M^{(n)}(ω_n, k²)=0 with ω_n=−i2πTn and the ingoing Frobenius exponent λ=0.
    Standard near-horizon pole-skipping formalism invoked in Sec. II B (Eq. 23); central to how k²_{n,q} is defined.
  • domain assumption The near-extremal black holes admit a smooth extremal limit with a double zero in f(r), nonzero h(r_0), and finite f″(r_0), giving an AdS2 throat.
    Sec. II A (Eqs. 6–11); without it the temperature-graded hierarchy (30) and the collapse formula (33) do not hold. The paper itself excludes BTZ and planar AdS-Schwarzschild on these grounds (Sec. II F).
  • domain assumption The perturbing field is a minimally coupled scalar with no coupling to the metric/axio-dilaton sector (the sound channel is not treated).
    Sec. II B (Eq. 15) uses Klein-Gordon; conclusions about λ_L and v_B for the sound channel in Sec. II F are not derived from this setup.
  • domain assumption The expansion is valid in the double-scaling regime n fixed, T→0 (nT→0).
    Stated in Sec. II C: 'reliable in the regime nT→0'; the n≫1 asymptotic (Eq. 36) requires nT small, acknowledged in Sec. IV.
  • standard math Standard AdS2/CFT1 dictionary: m²_eff L₂² = Δ_IR(Δ_IR−1).
    Borrowed from ref. [37] (Faulkner-Liu-McGreevy-Vegh); used in Eq. (13) to interpret q.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 23399 in / 26021 out tokens · 230290 ms · 2026-08-01T07:36:18.063727+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We develop a systematic analytic method for studying high-order pole-skipping in near-extremal holographic black holes. In the near-extremal regime, approaching the limit $T\to0$, the near-horizon geometry develops an approximately $\mathrm{AdS}_2 \times \mathbb{R}^{d-1}$ structure; we show that the mode index $q$ labeling pole-skipping points is identified with the IR conformal dimension $\Delta_{\mathrm{IR}} = q$ in the emergent $\mathrm{AdS}_2/\mathrm{CFT}_1$ correspondence, providing a concrete physical interpretation of the subleading pole-skipping tower. The method reorganizes the near-horizon Frobenius expansion according to powers of temperature. This reveals a temperature-graded hierarchical structure that reduces the $n$-th-order pole-skipping condition to a factorized algebraic equation:each pole-skipping momentum depends only on the mode index $q$, not on the order $n$. This $n$-independence produces a high degeneracy as $T\to 0$, where pole-skipping momenta at all orders collapse onto a discrete set of values determined by near-horizon geometry and the scalar field mass; these values can be expressed in terms of thermodynamic quantities such as entropy density and specific heat. In the limit $n \gg 1$ (with $nT$ remaining small), the leading pole-skipping momenta grow asymptotically as $k_{n,n} \propto n$. We compute leading temperature corrections and verify our predictions through numerical analysis of the Dyonic Gubser--Rocha model. The results confirm that high-order pole-skipping at low temperature is governed by near-horizon physics. This provides analytic access to pole-skipping points well beyond those accessible by standard determinant methods and clarifies the structure of holographic Green's functions in the low-temperature regime.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.21386 by Haiming Yuan, Xiang Li, Xian-Hui Ge.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: The first 5 orders of pole-skipping points [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Pole-skipping momenta [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Pole-skipping momenta [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Temperature dependence of pole-skipping momenta [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Finite-temperature pole-skipping trajectories [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Temperature dependence of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Temperature dependence of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Comparison of analytic prediction (dashed lines) and numerical results (points) for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 36 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    In the following section, we verify these predictions numerically in the Dyonic Gubser–Rocha model

    and clarifies the organizing principle of holographic Green’s functions in the low-temperature regime. In the following section, we verify these predictions numerically in the Dyonic Gubser–Rocha model. III. POLE-SKIPPING IN THE DYONIC GUBSER–ROCHA MODEL A. Dyonic Gubser–Rocha Action and Black Hole Geometry We apply the near-extremal pole-skipping analysi...

  2. [2]

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. M. Polyakov, Phys. Lett. B428, 105 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9802109

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  3. [3]

    J. M. Maldacena, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2, 231 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9711200

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  4. [4]

    M. J. Duff, R. R. Khuri, and J. X. Lu, Phys. Rept.259, 213 (1995), arXiv:hep-th/9412184

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  5. [5]

    Witten, Adv

    E. Witten, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2, 253 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9802150

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  6. [6]

    (33) then predicts the extremal pole-skipping momenta listed in Table I, which are independent of the ordern

    Eq. (33) then predicts the extremal pole-skipping momenta listed in Table I, which are independent of the ordern. Fig. 2 shows the dependence of pole-skipping momenta onρat fixedn 2 eff = 1√ 6 , obtained by numerically solving Eq. (23). Asρ→1,k 2 converges to the values in Table I for all ordersnsimultaneously, confirming the analytic prediction. At large...

  7. [7]

    Grozdanov, K

    S. Grozdanov, K. Schalm, and V. Scopelliti, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 231601 (2018), arXiv:1710.00921 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  8. [8]

    Blake, Phys

    M. Blake, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 091601 (2016), arXiv:1603.08510 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  9. [9]

    Blake, R

    M. Blake, R. A. Davison, S. Grozdanov, and H. Liu, JHEP10, 035, arXiv:1809.01169 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  10. [10]

    Blake, H

    M. Blake, H. Lee, and H. Liu, JHEP10, 127, arXiv:1801.00010 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  11. [11]

    Natsuume and T

    M. Natsuume and T. Okamura, PTEP2020, 013B07 (2020), arXiv:1905.12014 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  12. [12]

    Y. Ahn, V. Jahnke, H.-S. Jeong, K.-Y. Kim, K.-S. Lee, and M. Nishida, JHEP09, 111, arXiv:2006.00974 [hep- th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  13. [13]

    Yuan and X.-H

    H. Yuan and X.-H. Ge, JHEP06, 165, arXiv:2012.15396 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  14. [14]

    C. Choi, M. Mezei, and G. S´ arosi, JHEP02, 207, arXiv:2010.08558 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  15. [15]

    W. Z. Chua, T. Hartman, and W. W. Weng, (2025), arXiv:2504.08139 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Amrahi, M

    B. Amrahi, M. Asadi, and F. Taghinavaz, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 505 (2024), arXiv:2305.00298 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    D. Basu, A. Chandra, and Q. Wen, Phys. Rev. D112, 106007 (2025), arXiv:2505.14331 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Gao and H

    P. Gao and H. Liu, (2025), arXiv:2512.20700 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    Ceplak, K

    N. Ceplak, K. Ramdial, and D. Vegh, JHEP07, 203, arXiv:1910.02975 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1910

  20. [20]

    Jansen and C

    A. Jansen and C. Pantelidou, JHEP10, 121, arXiv:2007.14418 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  21. [21]

    Yuan, X.-H

    H. Yuan, X.-H. Ge, and K.-Y. Kim, Phys. Rev. D112, 026022 (2025), arXiv:2408.12330 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Yuan, X.-H

    H. Yuan, X.-H. Ge, and K.-Y. Kim, (2025), arXiv:2512.19087 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Yuan and X.-H

    H. Yuan and X.-H. Ge, Eur. Phys. J. C82, 167 (2022), arXiv:2110.08074 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  24. [24]

    Liu and P

    H. Liu and P. Glorioso, PoST ASI2017, 008 (2018), arXiv:1805.09331 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  25. [25]

    Yuan, X.-H

    H. Yuan, X.-H. Ge, K.-Y. Kim, C.-W. Ji, and Y. Ahn, JHEP08, 157, arXiv:2303.04801 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  26. [26]

    Y. Ahn, V. Jahnke, H.-S. Jeong, K.-Y. Kim, K.-S. Lee, and M. Nishida, JHEP03, 175, arXiv:2010.16166 [hep- th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  27. [27]

    Z. Lu, C. Ran, and S.-f. Wu, Phys. Rev. D113, 046008 (2026), arXiv:2507.13306 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2026

  28. [28]

    Z. Lu, C. Ran, and S.-f. Wu, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 061603 (2026), arXiv:2506.12890 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2026

  29. [29]

    Natsuume and T

    M. Natsuume and T. Okamura, Phys. Rev. D104, 126007 (2021), arXiv:2108.07832 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  30. [30]

    Blake and R

    M. Blake and R. A. Davison, JHEP01, 013, arXiv:2111.11093 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [31]

    Jeong, C.-W

    H.-S. Jeong, C.-W. Ji, and K.-Y. Kim, JHEP08, 139, arXiv:2306.14805 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [32]

    D. M. Ramirez, JHEP12, 006, arXiv:2009.00500 [hep- th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  33. [33]

    Pan, Y.-W

    W.-B. Pan, Y.-W. Sun, and Y.-T. Wang, JHEP07, 256, arXiv:2404.17354 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  34. [34]

    Abbasi and S

    N. Abbasi and S. Tahery, JHEP10, 076, arXiv:2007.10024 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  35. [35]

    Blake, R

    M. Blake, R. A. Davison, and D. Vegh, JHEP01, 077, arXiv:1904.12883 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1904

  36. [36]

    Ge and Z

    X.-H. Ge and Z. Xu, JHEP03, 069, arXiv:2310.12067 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  37. [37]

    Xu, (2023), arXiv:2312.04177 [hep-th]

    Z. Xu, (2023), arXiv:2312.04177 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  38. [38]

    Ishigaki and Z

    S. Ishigaki and Z. Xu, JHEP12, 182, arXiv:2406.00666 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  39. [39]

    Faulkner, H

    T. Faulkner, H. Liu, J. McGreevy, and D. Vegh, Phys. Rev. D83, 125002 (2011), arXiv:0907.2694 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  40. [40]

    Sachdev, Phys

    S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 151602 (2010), arXiv:1006.3794 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  41. [41]

    R. M. Wald, Living Rev. Rel.4, 6 (2001), arXiv:gr- qc/9912119

    arXiv 2001

  42. [42]

    Natsuume and T

    M. Natsuume and T. Okamura, Phys. Rev. D103, 066017 (2021), arXiv:2011.10093 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  43. [43]

    S. S. Gubser and F. D. Rocha, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 061601 (2009), arXiv:0807.1737 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  44. [44]

    Donos and J

    A. Donos and J. P. Gauntlett, JHEP11, 081, arXiv:1406.4742 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv