Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 199 references

The spectral gap of the Davies generator for the mean-field Heisenberg ferromagnet is Θ(1) above the critical temperature β=2 and Θ(1/n) below it, with the total magnetization as the slow observable.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

For the Davies generator of the mean-field Heisenberg ferromagnet, the spectral gap is Theta(1) for beta<2 and Theta(1/n) for beta>2, with total magnetization as the slow observable.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-01 challenge →

load-bearing objection Genuinely new gap theorem for non-commuting Davies generator; the stress-test's KMS counterexample fails, but the β=2 upper bound is indeed unproven as written. the 1 major comments →

arxiv 2607.21798 v1 pith:GE2XFS5Z submitted 2026-07-23 quant-ph math-phmath.MP

Spectral Gap of the Davies Generator for the Mean-Field Heisenberg Model

Joao Basso , Thiago Bergamaschi , Lin Lin , Michael Ragone , Kevin D. Stubbs This is my paper
classification quant-ph math-phmath.MP MSC 82B1082B26
keywords spectral gapDavies generatormean-field Heisenberg modelquantum thermalizationSU(2) symmetry breakingspherical tensor operatorsgroup comparisonGibbs state preparation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves a sharp, non-perturbative characterization of the thermalization rate for the mean-field Heisenberg ferromagnet, a fully permutation- and SU(2)-symmetric quantum spin model whose Gibbs state breaks continuous symmetry at inverse temperature β=2. Working with the Davies generator using single-site Pauli jumps, it shows the spectral gap is Θ(1) for β<2 and Θ(n^{-1}) for β>2, with intermediate Ω(n^{-1}) and O(n^{-1/2}) bounds at the critical point. The slowdown is polynomial rather than exponential, and the matching upper bound is witnessed by the total magnetization, tying the dynamical bottleneck to the broken continuous symmetry. If the result is right, this dissipative process prepares the Gibbs state in polynomial time at every fixed temperature, and the techniques open a route to analyze other symmetry-rich quantum thermalization problems.

Core claim

The central result, Theorem 1.1, fixes the system-size dependence of the spectral gap of the Davies generator L_loc with single-site Pauli jumps for the n-qubit mean-field Heisenberg Hamiltonian: gap(L_loc) = Θ(1) for β<2, gap(L_loc) = Θ(n^{-1}) for β>2, and at β=2, Ω(n^{-1}) ≤ gap(L_loc) ≤ O(n^{-1/2}). The gap is computed by decomposing the observable algebra according to the SU(2)×S_n symmetry of the model and bounding the dissipation separately on permutation-non-invariant observables, on the SU(2)×S_n-invariant sector (a coarse-grained birth-death chain over total spin), and on the remaining permutation-invariant sectors using a spherical tensor operator basis. The observable that satura

What carries the argument

The proof rests on two tools: group mixer comparison and a symmetry-adapted basis. Group mixers are auxiliary Davies generators—one built from transpositions along an expander graph on n vertices (kernel comm(S_n), gap Ω(1)) and one built from total spin operators (the quadratic Casimir, kernel comm(SU(2)))—whose Dirichlet forms are shown to be dominated by the single-site Pauli dynamics up to a β-dependent constant independent of n. The observable space is decomposed into sectors: the complement of permutation-invariant observables, the SU(2)×S_n-invariant sector A^(0) (which becomes a tridiagonal birth-death chain by Wigner-Eckart selection rules), and higher-spin sectors A^(ℓ) spanned by

Load-bearing premise

The whole lower-bound program on permutation-non-invariant observables leans on the comparison inequality that a group-mixer Davies generator is dominated by the single-site Pauli generator with constants independent of n; if the KMS Hölder inequality behind that comparison fails in the stated generality, the constant spectral gap at high temperature collapses.

What would settle it

Compute the spectral gap of L_loc exactly for small n (e.g., n=8,16,32) at fixed β>2 and β<2 by diagonalizing the Lindbladian on the relevant symmetry sectors, and check that n·gap is bounded at low temperature and gap is bounded below at high temperature. Alternatively, verify the key comparison inequality numerically by evaluating both Dirichlet forms on random observables at moderate n; finding the ratio growing with n would refute Proposition 3.8.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Polynomial-time Gibbs sampling: the gap lower bounds imply the Davies semigroup thermalizes the mean-field Heisenberg model in poly(n) time for every fixed β, and Corollary 1.2 gives a quantum circuit with poly(n, log(1/ε)) gates preparing the Gibbs state to error ε.
  • The low-temperature slowdown is n rather than exponential: unlike the mean-field Ising model, relaxation is bottlenecked along a continuously degenerate symmetry-broken manifold, not across a discrete barrier.
  • The total magnetization is the slowest observable; its Rayleigh quotient saturates the gap, providing a simple diagnostic that connects a model's static order parameter to its dynamical phase diagram.
  • The machinery (group mixers plus spherical tensor decomposition) is transferable to other symmetry-rich Lindbladians, including complete-graph XY/XXZ models and, via translation-invariant momentum sectors, geometrically local Heisenberg-type lattices.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the monotonicity of the minimal eigenvalue in ℓ holds for a broader class of SU(2)-symmetric Davies generators, the high-temperature constant gap may be a generic feature whenever the ℓ=1 sector has a Dirichlet form that vanishes linearly in (2−β); testing this on the complete-graph XY model would be a direct check.
  • The coincidence between the slow observable and the static order parameter suggests a quantitative rule: in models with continuous symmetry breaking, the inverse gap should scale like the variance of the order parameter (≈ n/β_susceptibility). This could be tested numerically for the antiferromagnetic complete-graph Heisenberg model, where the order parameter is staggered.
  • The comparison lemma's β-dependent constant is not tracked explicitly; understanding its growth in β would clarify how close to β=2 the Θ(1) high-temperature bound holds, and whether the Ω(n^{-1/2}) critical bound can be improved to a matching Θ(n^{-1/2}).
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes the Davies generator with single-site Pauli jumps for the mean-field Heisenberg ferromagnet H = -1/n \sum_{i<j} S_i\cdot S_j. It claims sharp system-size asymptotics for the spectral gap: Θ(1) for fixed β<2, Θ(n^{-1}) for fixed β>2, and the intermediate bounds Ω(n^{-1}) ≤ gap ≤ O(n^{-1/2}) at β=2. The proof strategy is representation-theoretic: Schur-Weyl duality decomposes observables into sectors under SU(2)×S_n; a group-mixer comparison bounds the permutation-non-invariant sector; the coarse-grained Pauli master equation on total-spin labels is analyzed via Cheeger's inequality and Laplace's method; an SU(2)-Casimir comparison gives the low-temperature bound; and a spherical-tensor basis with a monotonicity lemma gives the high-temperature bound. The upper bounds are witnessed by the total magnetization operator S^Z_tot.

Significance. If the noncritical claims are correct, this is a substantial advance: it provides the first non-perturbative, sharp spectral-gap characterization for the Davies generator of a non-commuting quantum Hamiltonian in the presence of a thermodynamic phase transition. The proof is largely self-contained and parameter-free: explicit Wigner-Eckart computations, tracked constants, no fitted parameters, and a clear decomposition of the observable algebra. The group-mixer comparison technique and the ℓ-monotonicity of the A^{(ℓ)} sectors are likely reusable. The associated Gibbs-sampling corollary is straightforward but correctly connects the result to the quantum-algorithm literature. The main caveat is that one bound in the critical-temperature statement appears unproven in the current text.

major comments (1)
  1. [§3.7, Theorem 3.21 and Lemma 3.23] Theorem 1.1 asserts the critical upper bound gap(L_loc) ≤ O(n^{-1/2}) at β=2, but the proof section does not cover this case. Theorem 3.21 explicitly states 'Fix any β≠2', and Lemma 3.23 supplies variance lower bounds only for β<2 and β>2. The β<2 bound Var[S^Z_tot] ≥ c n would give only E/Var ≤ O(1), not O(n^{-1/2}). To obtain the claimed n^{-1/2}, one needs Var[S^Z_tot] = Ω(n^{3/2}) at β=2, which is consistent with the critical Laplace analysis in Appendix D but is nowhere stated or proved. Please add the missing critical variance computation, or revise the statement of Theorem 1.1.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Appendix E.2, Eq. (E.9)] The key estimate ∥[A1,O]A2∥ρ ≤ ∥[A1,O]∥ρ ∥ρ^{-1/4}A2ρ^{1/4}∥ is correct when the unlabelled norm is the operator norm: ∥AB∥ρ = ∥(ρ^{1/4}Aρ^{1/4})(ρ^{-1/4}Bρ^{1/4})∥₂ ≤ ∥A∥ρ ∥ρ^{-1/4}Bρ^{1/4}∥. The manuscript should state this explicitly rather than sending the reader to [CR25, Lemma IX.4], since the notation is otherwise ambiguous. In particular, the alleged counterexample in the review does not invalidate the lemma: for Y=|1><1|, ρ^{-1/4}Yρ^{1/4}=Y and has operator norm 1, so the inequality holds.
  2. [§3.5, Theorem 3.11] Theorem 3.11 is stated as L_loc|_{A^{(ℓ)}} ≥ Ω(n^{-1})·1, but L_loc is negative semidefinite. The intended statement is −L_loc|_{A^{(ℓ)}} ≥ Ω(n^{-1})·1. The same sign issue appears in the first paragraph of §3.6. Please correct.
  3. [§3.4, Eq. (3.25)] The direction of the transitions in the matrix L_{s,s'} is easy to misread. Since the state-space labels are total spins and L is defined by Eq. (3.23), please state explicitly that L_{s,s'} is the generator matrix with column/row convention used in Proposition 3.10 and how the off-diagonal rates correspond to s→s±1 transitions.
  4. [Appendix F.3, Eq. (F.69)] The displayed factor '32 r n/(2−β)' appears to be a typesetting error; for the subsequent Θ(n/(2−β)) bound to be valid it should likely be '32 n/((2−β)r)'. Please verify the constants in this display.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the gap derivation is self-contained; self-citations are technical and not load-bearing.

full rationale

The central derivation of Theorem 1.1 does not reduce to its inputs. The spectral gap is obtained by Schur-Weyl decomposition, an explicit coarse-grained birth-death chain (Section 3.4), group-mixer comparisons (Sections 3.3, 3.5, Appendix E), and direct Dirichlet-form/monotonicity estimates (Section 3.6, Appendix F). No gap bound is fitted or assumed as input. The comparison inequality Proposition 3.8, the main non-trivial lower-bound step on comm(S_n)^⊥, is proved in Appendix E by an explicit multi-site-to-single-site commutator estimate and a complex-time evolution bound derived from the Wigner-Eckart band structure (Corollary C.4, Lemma E.4); its Hölder step is cited to the external reference [CR25], not to the authors' own work. Self-citations such as [Bas+25, Prop. 2.9] for the Davies divergence form and [BC25; BCV25] for comparison methodology are technical or motivational, and they do not smuggle in the target gap. The upper-bound witness S^Z_tot is a genuine Rayleigh-quotient computation from the Gibbs variance, not a renaming of the static order parameter. Even if Lemma E.2's norm inequality is mathematically invalid (as the accompanying skeptic note alleges), that would be a correctness defect, not circularity; it would not make the derivation equivalent to its assumptions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

No data-fitted parameters appear: all constants are universal and fixed by the proof, and cutoffs such as z=16 sqrt(n/(2-beta)) are proof devices. The auxiliary generators L_Sn and L_su(2) are mathematical constructs introduced for the comparison arguments, not new physical entities. The model itself is standard, and the Davies generator is a canonical open-system dynamics with the Metropolis weight choice.

axioms (6)
  • standard math Schur-Weyl duality and the decomposition H = ⊕_s V_s ⊠ W_{Q(s)} (Theorem 2.2)
    Basis for the sector decomposition of both the Hilbert space and the observable algebra; cited from [Sim96] and used throughout Section 3.2.
  • domain assumption The Heisenberg Hamiltonian is the quadratic Casimir up to shift and rescaling (Proposition 2.3)
    Derived in Appendix A.3 from Schur-Weyl; it is needed so that the energy projectors coincide with SU(2) x S_n sectors, giving Lemma 3.3.
  • standard math Wigner-Eckart theorem and Clebsch-Gordan selection rules for single-site Pauli matrix elements (Theorem C.1)
    Used to prove tridiagonality of the coarse-grained Pauli master equation and of L_loc restricted to A^(l,q); cited from [SN20].
  • standard math Group transference: spectral properties of classical random walks on S_n and heat semigroup on SU(2) transfer to Lindbladians
    External theorem imported from [Bar+21a] to compute the kernels and spectral gaps of the auxiliary group mixers L_Sn and L_su(2) (Propositions 3.7 and 3.12).
  • standard math Existence of explicit O(1)-regular expander graphs with Omega(1) spectral gap (Fact 3.6)
    Provides the sparse set of transpositions used to define L_Sn; cited from [RVW02].
  • standard math KMS Holder inequality ||AB||_rho <= ||A||_rho ||rho^{-1/4} B rho^{1/4}|| (Lemma E.2)
    Key analytic input in the simulation comparison of Proposition 3.8; cited from [CR25, Lemma IX.4]. It is the main external estimate controlling the beta-dependent comparison constant.

reviewed 2026-08-01 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spectral Gap of the Davies Generator for the Mean-Field Heisenberg Model." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GE2XFS5Z

@misc{pith2026260721798,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spectral Gap of the Davies Generator for the Mean-Field Heisenberg Model},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GE2XFS5Z}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.21798}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

The mean-field Heisenberg ferromagnet is a quantum spin model on the complete graph with isotropic spin-1/2 interactions. This non-commuting Hamiltonian is permutation and $\mathsf{SU}(2)$ invariant, and its Gibbs states undergo an $\mathsf{SU}(2)$ symmetry breaking phase transition at inverse temperature $\beta=2$. We consider the associated Davies generator, a canonical model of open-system thermalization, and prove tight asymptotic estimates for its spectral gap at all noncritical temperatures. For fixed $\beta<2$, the gap as a function of number of qubits $n$ is $\Theta(1)$, while for fixed $\beta>2$ the gap is $\Theta(n^{-1})$. The matching upper bound of the spectral gap is witnessed by the total magnetization order parameter, suggesting that the low-temperature ($\beta>2$) slowdown is associated with broken continuous symmetry. Two key ingredients in our approach are a comparison argument, which introduces auxiliary generators to bound dissipation on nontrivial representations of the symmetry groups $\mathsf{SU}(2)$ and $\mathsf{S}_n$, and a decomposition of the space of observables into spherical tensor operators to reveal a form of monotonicity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.21798 by Joao Basso, Kevin D. Stubbs, Lin Lin, Michael Ragone, Thiago Bergamaschi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Plots of fβ for different values of β. Most of the mass of the stationary distribution concentrates around the minimum of fβ, as predicted by Laplace’s method. The phase transition at β = 2 occurs when the minimum moves from x∗ = 0 to positive x∗ > 0. Note that this definition implies that x∗ + cβ ≤ 1 2 (1 + x∗) < 1. The definition of cβ for β = 2 is nearly identical to β ̸= 2, however we instead ask the f… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

199 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Markov Process

    An example of application of discrete. Markov Process. Related Fields , author =. 1999 , pages =

    1999

  2. [2]

    On the mixing time and spectral gap for birth and death chains , journal =

    Chen, Guan-Yu and Saloff-Coste, Laurent , year =. On the mixing time and spectral gap for birth and death chains , journal =

  3. [3]

    Efficient thermalization and universal quantum computing with quantum

    Rouzé, Cambyse and França, Daniel Stilck and Alhambra, Álvaro M , year =. Efficient thermalization and universal quantum computing with quantum. Proceedings of the 57th

  4. [4]

    A remark on

    Robbins, Herbert , year =. A remark on. The American mathematical monthly , publisher =

  5. [5]

    Communications in Mathematical Physics , author =

    Spectral. Communications in Mathematical Physics , author =. 2020 , note =. doi:10.1007/s00220-020-03908-9 , number =

    work page doi:10.1007/s00220-020-03908-9 2020

  6. [6]

    , month = jan, year =

    Wong, R. , month = jan, year =. Asymptotic. doi:10.1137/1.9780898719260 , publisher =

    doi:10.1137/1.9780898719260

  7. [7]

    , year =

    Hall, Brian C. , year =. Lie groups,. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-13467-3 , publisher =

    doi:10.1007/978-3-319-13467-3

  8. [8]

    , year =

    Hall, Brian C. , year =. Quantum theory for mathematicians , volume =. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-7116-5 , publisher =

    doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-7116-5

  9. [9]

    Symmetry protection of topological phases in one-dimensional quantum spin systems , volume =

    Pollmann, Frank and Berg, Erez and Turner, Ari M and Oshikawa, Masaki , year =. Symmetry protection of topological phases in one-dimensional quantum spin systems , volume =. Physical Review B , publisher =

  10. [10]

    Diagnosing barren plateaus with tools from quantum optimal control , volume =

    Larocca, Martin and Czarnik, Piotr and Sharma, Kunal and Muraleedharan, Gopikrishnan and Coles, Patrick J.and Cerezo, Marco , year =. Diagnosing barren plateaus with tools from quantum optimal control , volume =. Quantum , publisher =

  11. [11]

    Introduction to quantum control and dynamics , publisher =

    d’Alessandro, Domenico , year =. Introduction to quantum control and dynamics , publisher =

  12. [12]

    Quasi-locality bounds for quantum lattice systems

    Nachtergaele, Bruno and Sims, Robert and Young, Amanda , year =. Quasi-locality bounds for quantum lattice systems. Journal of Mathematical Physics , publisher =

  13. [13]

    Young, Amanda , year =. Quantum

  14. [14]

    Does active learning work?

    Prince, Michael , year =. Does active learning work?. Journal of engineering education , publisher =

  15. [15]

    and Moessner, Roderich and Cugliandolo, Leticia F

    Pollmann, Frank and Chamon, Claudio and Goerbig, Mark O. and Moessner, Roderich and Cugliandolo, Leticia F. , year =. Symmetry protected topological phases in one-dimensional systems , journal =

  16. [16]

    2015 , note =

    Computing energy density in one dimension , author =. 2015 , note =

    2015

  17. [17]

    Topological properties of spaces of projective unitary representations , volume =

    Espinoza, Jesús and Uribe, Bernardo , year =. Topological properties of spaces of projective unitary representations , volume =. Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales , publisher =

  18. [18]

    A direct proof of dimerization in a family of

    Nachtergaele, Bruno and Ueltschi, Daniel , year =. A direct proof of dimerization in a family of. Letters in Mathematical Physics , publisher =

  19. [19]

    Dimerization and

    Aizenman, Michael and Duminil-Copin, Hugo and Warzel, Simone , year =. Dimerization and. Annales

  20. [20]

    Quasi-locality bounds for quantum lattice systems

    Nachtergaele, Bruno and Sims, Robert and Young, Amanda , year =. Quasi-locality bounds for quantum lattice systems. Annales

  21. [21]

    , year =

    Simms, D.J. , year =. Topological aspects of the projective unitary group , volume =. Mathematical

  22. [22]

    The unitary group in its strong topology , volume =

    Schottenloher, Martin and. The unitary group in its strong topology , volume =. Advances in Pure Mathematics , publisher =. 2018 , note =

    2018

  23. [23]

    , year =

    Spiegel, Daniel D. , year =. A

  24. [24]

    and Moreno, Juan and Qi, Marvin and Hermele, Michael and Beaudry, Agnès and Pflaum, Markus J

    Spiegel, Daniel D. and Moreno, Juan and Qi, Marvin and Hermele, Michael and Beaudry, Agnès and Pflaum, Markus J. , year =. Continuous dependence on the initial data in the. Reviews in Mathematical Physics , publisher =

  25. [25]

    , year =

    Hastings, Matthew B. , year =. An area law for one-dimensional quantum systems , volume =. Journal of statistical mechanics: theory and experiment , publisher =

  26. [26]

    , year =

    Hastings, Matthew B. , year =. Lieb-. Physical Review B , publisher =

  27. [27]

    and Robinson, Derek W

    Lieb, Elliott H. and Robinson, Derek W. , year =. The finite group velocity of quantum spin systems , volume =. Communications in Mathematical Physics , publisher =

  28. [28]

    Matsui, Taku , year =. The. Communications in Mathematical Physics , publisher =

  29. [29]

    Boundedness of entanglement entropy and split property of quantum spin chains , volume =

    Matsui, Taku , year =. Boundedness of entanglement entropy and split property of quantum spin chains , volume =. Reviews in Mathematical Physics , publisher =

  30. [30]

    Transactions of the American Mathematical Society , author =

    Group extensions and cohomology for locally compact groups. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society , author =. 1976 , pages =

    1976

  31. [31]

    Bundles, classifying spaces and characteristic classes , url =

    Kottke, Chris , year =. Bundles, classifying spaces and characteristic classes , url =

  32. [32]

    Matrix product density operators:

    Cirac, J.Ignacio and Perez-Garcia, David and Schuch, Norbert and Verstraete, Frank , year =. Matrix product density operators:. Annals of Physics , publisher =

  33. [33]

    A character theory for projective representations of finite groups , volume =

    Cheng, Chuangxun , year =. A character theory for projective representations of finite groups , volume =. Linear Algebra and its applications , publisher =

  34. [34]

    Hilbert's fifth problem and related topics , volume =

    Tao, Terence , year =. Hilbert's fifth problem and related topics , volume =. doi:10.1090/gsm/153 , publisher =

    work page doi:10.1090/gsm/153

  35. [35]

    Transactions of the American Mathematical Society , author =

    Extensions and low dimensional cohomology theory of locally compact groups. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society , author =. 1964 , pages =

    1964

  36. [36]

    A note on the multipliers and projective representations of semi-simple

    Bagchi, Bhaskar and Misra, Gadadhar , year =. A note on the multipliers and projective representations of semi-simple. Sankhyā: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series A. , publisher =

  37. [37]

    , year =

    Knapp, Anthony W. , year =. Lie groups beyond an introduction , volume =. doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2453-0 , publisher =

    doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2453-0

  38. [38]

    On unitary ray representations of continuous groups , journal =

    Bargmann, Valentine , year =. On unitary ray representations of continuous groups , journal =

  39. [39]

    Schottenloher, Martin , year =. A

  40. [40]

    Automorphic equivalence within gapped phases of quantum lattice systems , volume =

    Bachmann, Sven and Michalakis, Spyridon and Nachtergaele, Bruno and Sims, Robert , year =. Automorphic equivalence within gapped phases of quantum lattice systems , volume =. Communications in Mathematical Physics , publisher =

  41. [41]

    Zeng, Bei and Chen, Xie and Zhou, Duan-Lu and Wen, Xiao-Gang , year =. Quantum

  42. [42]

    , year =

    White, Steven R. , year =. Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups , volume =. Physical review letters , publisher =

  43. [43]

    Streater, Raymond Frederick and Wightman, Arthur Strong , year =

  44. [44]

    Automorphic equivalence within gapped phases in the bulk , volume =

    Moon, Alvin and Ogata, Yoshiko , year =. Automorphic equivalence within gapped phases in the bulk , volume =. Journal of Functional Analysis , publisher =

  45. [45]

    Graphical

    Ueltschi, Daniel , year =. Graphical

  46. [46]

    The spark of learning:

    Cavanagh, Sarah Rose , year =. The spark of learning:

  47. [47]

    , year =

    Lang, J.M. , year =. Small

  48. [48]

    2005 , note =

    Quantum computation, complexity, and many-body physics , author =. 2005 , note =

    2005

  49. [49]

    and Emmett, K.M

    Caspers, W.J. and Emmett, K.M. and Magnus, W. , year =. The. Journal of physics A: mathematical and general , publisher =

  50. [50]

    Ragone, Michael and Bakalov, Bojko N and Sauvage, Frédéric and Kemper, Alexander F and Marrero, Carlos Ortiz and Larocca, Martin and Cerezo, M , year =. A

  51. [51]

    Zur theorie der metalle:

    Bethe, Hans , year =. Zur theorie der metalle:. Zeitschrift für Physik , publisher =

  52. [52]

    Physics and mathematics of quantum many-body systems , volume =

    Tasaki, Hal , year =. Physics and mathematics of quantum many-body systems , volume =. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-41265-4 , publisher =

    doi:10.1007/978-3-030-41265-4

  53. [53]

    Equivalence of quantum barren plateaus to cost concentration and narrow gorges , volume =

    Arrasmith, Andrew and Holmes, Zoë and Cerezo, Marco and Coles, Patrick J , year =. Equivalence of quantum barren plateaus to cost concentration and narrow gorges , volume =. Quantum Science and Technology , publisher =

  54. [54]

    and Chuang, Isaac L

    Nielsen, Michael A. and Chuang, Isaac L. , year =. Quantum computation and quantum information , publisher =

  55. [55]

    Quantum spin systems on infinite lattices , volume =

    Naaijkens, Pieter , year =. Quantum spin systems on infinite lattices , volume =. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-51458-1 , publisher =

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-51458-1

  56. [56]

    Exploiting symmetry in variational quantum machine learning , volume =

    Meyer, Johannes Jakob and Mularski, Marian and Gil-Fuster, Elies and Mele, Antonio Anna and Arzani, Francesco and Wilms, Alissa and Eisert, Jens , year =. Exploiting symmetry in variational quantum machine learning , volume =. PRX Quantum , publisher =

  57. [57]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.09207 , year=

    An efficient and exact noncommutative quantum Gibbs sampler , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.09207 , year=

    arXiv

  58. [58]

    2023 , eprint=

    Quantum Thermal State Preparation , author=. 2023 , eprint=

    2023

  59. [59]

    Quantum spins and random loops on the complete graph , volume =

    Björnberg, Jakob E and Fröhlich, Jürg and Ueltschi, Daniel , year =. Quantum spins and random loops on the complete graph , volume =. Communications in Mathematical Physics , publisher =

  60. [60]

    Equilibrium states for mean field models , volume =

    Fannes, Mark and Spohn, H and Verbeure, André , year =. Equilibrium states for mean field models , volume =. Journal of Mathematical Physics , publisher =

  61. [61]

    2022 , note =

    Representation theory for geometric quantum machine learning , author =. 2022 , note =

    2022

  62. [62]

    Variational quantum algorithms , volume =

    Cerezo, Marco and Arrasmith, Andrew and Babbush, Ryan and Benjamin, Simon C and Endo, Suguru and Fujii, Keisuke and McClean, Jarrod R and Mitarai, Kosuke and Yuan, Xiao and Cincio, Lukasz and. Variational quantum algorithms , volume =. Nature Reviews Physics , publisher =. 2021 , pages =

    2021

  63. [63]

    Topological phases of spin chains , volume =

    Duivenvoorden, Kasper and Quella, Thomas , year =. Topological phases of spin chains , volume =. Physical Review B , publisher =

  64. [64]

    Quasi-state decompositions for quantum spin systems , booktitle =

    Nachtergaele, Bruno , year =. Quasi-state decompositions for quantum spin systems , booktitle =

  65. [65]

    The spectral gap for some spin chains with discrete symmetry breaking , volume =

    Nachtergaele, Bruno , year =. The spectral gap for some spin chains with discrete symmetry breaking , volume =. Communications in Mathematical Physics , publisher =

  66. [66]

    An introduction to

    Kirillov, Jr., Alexander , year =. An introduction to. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755156 , number =

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511755156

  67. [67]

    Nachtergaele, Bruno and Sims, Robert , year =. Lieb-. Communications in Mathematical Physics , publisher =

  68. [68]

    and Koma, Tohru , year =

    Hastings, Matthew B. and Koma, Tohru , year =. Spectral gap and exponential decay of correlations , volume =. Communications in Mathematical Physics , publisher =

  69. [69]

    On gapped phases with a continuous symmetry and boundary operators , volume =

    Bachmann, Sven and Nachtergaele, Bruno , year =. On gapped phases with a continuous symmetry and boundary operators , volume =. Journal of Statistical Physics , publisher =

  70. [70]

    Dimerization in quantum spin chains with

    Björnberg, Jakob E and Mühlbacher, Peter and Nachtergaele, Bruno and Ueltschi, Daniel , year =. Dimerization in quantum spin chains with. Communications in Mathematical Physics , publisher =

  71. [71]

    Class of exactly solvable

    Tu, Hong-Hao and Zhang, Guang-Ming and Xiang, Tao , year =. Class of exactly solvable. Physical Review B , publisher =

  72. [72]

    Random loop representations for quantum spin systems , volume =

    Ueltschi, Daniel , year =. Random loop representations for quantum spin systems , volume =. Journal of Mathematical Physics , publisher =

  73. [73]

    Okada, Soichi , month = jun, year =. Pieri. doi:10.37236/6214 , journal =

    work page doi:10.37236/6214

  74. [74]

    Lie algebras in particle physics , volume =

    Georgi, Howard , year =. Lie algebras in particle physics , volume =

  75. [75]

    Valence bond ground states in isotropic quantum antiferromagnets , volume =

    Affleck, Ian and Kennedy, Tom and Lieb, Elliott H and Tasaki, Hal , year =. Valence bond ground states in isotropic quantum antiferromagnets , volume =. Communications in Mathematical Physics , publisher =

  76. [76]

    Finitely correlated states on quantum spin chains , volume =

    Fannes, Mark and Nachtergaele, Bruno and Werner, Reinhard F , year =. Finitely correlated states on quantum spin chains , volume =. Communications in Mathematical Physics , publisher =

  77. [77]

    A method of functional equations in the theory of exactly solvable quantum systems , journal =

    Reshetikin, Nicolai , year =. A method of functional equations in the theory of exactly solvable quantum systems , journal =

  78. [78]

    Wolf, Michael , year =. Quantum

  79. [79]

    Representations of

    Simon, Barry , year =. Representations of

  80. [80]

    Simon, Barry , year =. Phase. doi:10.1017/9781108649117 , publisher =

    doi:10.1017/9781108649117

Showing first 80 references.

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 1, 2026.