Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 108 references

A new edge-selection procedure, RECON, turns noisy group-LASSO ODE estimates into nearly perfect directed regulatory networks, cutting spurious edges from 239 to zero in simulations and exposing distinct pre- and post-transplant microbial r

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 06:33 UTC pith:4OPFRT6B

load-bearing objection RECON is an honest, incremental extension of GRADE whose GMM threshold convincingly kills spurious edges in clean simulations, but the separation assumption is untested, results are single-run, and no code is released. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.21833 v1 pith:4OPFRT6B submitted 2026-07-23 stat.ME stat.ML

Reconstruction of Enhanced Causal Omnidirectional Network (RECON)

Praveen Niranda , Peter T. McKenney , Guifang Fu This is my paper
classification stat.ME stat.ML MSC 62G0562-08
keywords regulatory network reconstructionnonparametric ODEintegral-based estimationgroup LASSOGaussian mixture modelmaximum-ratio criterionlongitudinal datamicrobiome dynamics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

RECON claims to solve a practical bottleneck in reconstructing regulatory networks from time-course data: standard ODE-based methods like group LASSO leave many spurious edges because they lack a principled cutoff. The paper shows that a data-driven threshold—built from per-node normalized edge strengths, Gaussian mixture clustering, and a maximum-ratio gap criterion—can strip away almost all false edges while keeping nearly all true ones. Across five simulation studies spanning linear and nonlinear systems and dense or sparse sampling, RECON reaches AUC-ROC 1.00 in most settings, and in the hardest case reduces spurious edges from 239 to 0. Applied to longitudinal gut microbiota from transplant patients, it yields pre- and post-transplant networks with different topologies and keystone taxa, suggesting regulatory dynamics that abundance trends alone do not show.

Core claim

The paper establishes that an adaptive threshold placed at the largest relative gap between clusters of normalized regulatory strengths effectively separates true edges from estimation noise in an integral-based additive nonparametric ODE model. After fitting the model with group LASSO, RECON normalizes each node's estimated edge strengths, clusters the pooled normalized strengths with a Gaussian Mixture Model, and selects the cluster boundary with the maximum drop ratio between adjacent clusters. This boundary becomes the cutoff for edge inclusion. In simulations, the procedure retains all or nearly all true directed edges while driving false positives to zero or near zero, improving on the

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the data-driven edge threshold built from normalized regulatory strengths. For each node, the estimated L2 norms of group-LASSO coefficients are normalized to [0,1], pooled across nodes, clustered by a Gaussian Mixture Model, and the optimal cluster boundary is chosen by the maximum ratio of the smallest strength in a large-strength cluster to the largest strength in the adjacent small-strength cluster (Equation 19). This threshold converts the dense set of nonzero estimates into a sparse, signed, weighted omnidirectional adjacency matrix. The rest of the pipeline—local polynomial or PACE smoothing, basis expansion, integrated basis functions, and group-LASSO estim

Load-bearing premise

The edge cutoff assumes that the estimated strengths of true and spurious edges form well-separated clusters, so that the largest gap between GMM clusters is the correct boundary; if the strength distributions overlap, the threshold will either keep spurious edges or drop true ones.

What would settle it

Run RECON on a simulation where the weakest true edge has an estimated strength comparable to the strongest spurious edge (for example, by adding a true edge with a very small coefficient while keeping noise at the same level). If the GMM maximum-ratio threshold then fails to recover that true edge without adding spurious ones, the separation assumption is violated and the paper's headline claim collapses.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If correct, regulatory network reconstruction from discretely observed time courses can be made nearly spurious-free without sacrificing true edges, making ODE-based inference practical for noisy biological data.
  • The method extends ODE-based reconstruction to sparse, irregular longitudinal sampling designs, which are common in clinical microbiome studies, by interpolating subject-specific trajectories onto a common dense grid.
  • Modeling edge effects as time-varying functions allows networks to be studied dynamically: regulatory relationships can strengthen, weaken, or reverse over the observation window, which is invisible to constant-coefficient methods.
  • The signed and weighted omnidirectional output supports direct biological interpretation, including activatory/inhibitory roles, keystone-node identification, and modularity, as demonstrated on pre- and post-transplant gut microbiota networks.
  • The reported reduction from 239 to 0 spurious edges in the most challenging simulation is concrete evidence that the threshold can perform well even when the baseline method is very noisy.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method's success depends on the empirical separation between true and spurious edge strengths; if that separation is absent or weak in other applications, the GMM threshold may either retain spurious edges or drop legitimate weak regulators. This is a testable limitation not addressed theoretically in the paper.
  • The real-data 'causal' interpretation carries the implicit assumption that the additive nonparametric ODE structure (including the dropped basis-expansion residual in Section 3.3) is a faithful description of gut microbial dynamics. A reader should treat the inferred pre/post-transplant regulatory differences as hypothesis-generating rather than confirmatory.
  • The threshold logic could be transferred to other sparse-estimation settings where group coefficients need hard-thresholding, though doing so would require re-establishing the separation property for each new problem.
  • The paper's five simulation studies all use block-structured ground truths; a natural next test would be a scale-free network or one with heterogeneous edge strengths, where the gap between true and spurious strengths might be less pronounced.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes RECON, an integral-based additive nonparametric ODE approach for reconstructing directed, signed, dynamic regulatory networks from longitudinal data. Methodologically, RECON estimates regulatory functions through B-spline expansions and group LASSO, then applies a data-driven threshold constructed from Gaussian mixture modeling and a maximum-ratio criterion to remove spurious edges. The paper claims that across five simulation studies RECON consistently outperforms GRADE, reducing spurious edges to zero or near zero while retaining true edges, and it applies the method to a longitudinal gut microbiota dataset from allo-HCT patients, reporting pre- and post-transplant networks with candidate keystone taxa.

Significance. If the reported results hold, RECON would provide a practical improvement over GRADE by adding a principled-looking, data-driven edge-selection step to a well-established nonparametric ODE framework, while also extending applicability to sparse irregular longitudinal designs. The real-data analysis addresses an important clinical dataset and offers falsifiable, network-level hypotheses about microbial regulation after transplantation. However, the central threshold assumption and the single-run simulation evidence are not yet sufficient to support the headline claim of consistent, near-perfect reconstruction. No circular reasoning is apparent: the GMM threshold is based on estimated edge strengths without using true adjacency labels, and the GRADE comparison uses identical model estimates with a different post-hoc threshold.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.4, Eq. (19)] The threshold selection procedure assumes that normalized strengths of true and spurious edges are well separated and that the largest ratio min(C_l)/max(C_{l+1}) identifies the correct boundary. This assumption is load-bearing: the headline result of reducing spurious edges from 239 to 0 (Simulation 1-II) occurs in a design where each target node has exactly one true incoming edge, so after per-node normalization the true edge has strength 1 and spurious edges are near 0. The paper provides no theoretical or empirical support for the separation in other configurations, and the procedure is undefined when BIC selects K=1. The authors should either provide a theoretical characterization of the gap or demonstrate robustness through simulations with overlapping strength distributions, heterogeneous true degrees, and multiple true edges per node.
  2. [§4.3 and Tables 1–5] All simulation results appear to be single runs with no standard errors, confidence intervals, or repeated-seed analysis. The claim that RECON 'consistently outperforms' GRADE cannot be evaluated from one realization per setting, particularly when AUC values are reported to four decimal places. Additionally, the reported 'AUC-ROC' is computed as (1 + TPR - FPR)/2, which is a linear transformation of a single operating point, not the area under an ROC curve. This metric is misleading as an AUC and should either be computed as a proper area over a range of thresholds or renamed. Repeated Monte Carlo simulation and a correctly defined AUC are needed before the comparative claim is supported.
  3. [§3.3, Eqs. (12)–(14)] The residual integral term sum_k ∫ δ_jk(X_k(u;θ)) du is dropped as negligible, but no justification or numerical check is provided. This is especially concerning for the nonlinear Brusselator system in Eq. (31), where the additive B-spline assumption may not hold with a small residual over the trajectory support. The authors should either provide a bound on the dropped term or report a simulation diagnostic comparing fitted and true regulatory functions to show that the omission does not materially bias the estimated edge strengths in any of the five settings.
  4. [§5.2–5.3] The real-data networks are interpreted as 'causal' and used to identify keystone taxa and regulatory dynamics, but no sensitivity analysis is given for the threshold selection or for preprocessing choices (PACE tuning, GMM/BIC, the maximum-ratio boundary). Since the entire network topology depends on the threshold in Eq. (19), the biological conclusions in Section 5 could change under a different but equally reasonable threshold. The authors should report how edge counts, modularity, and keystone identifications vary with the threshold and with reasonable perturbations of the preprocessing steps.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§4.3] The sentence 'smaller TP or larger FN indicates possible model misclassification' is confusing; smaller TP is not a sign of better performance, and the intended meaning should be rephrased.
  2. [§3.4, Eq. (18)] Since group LASSO estimates are rarely exactly zero in finite samples, the definition of G^GRADE using strict positivity is not numerically operational as stated; the paper should clarify how zero coefficients are identified in practice.
  3. [Figures 1, 4–8] Gray arrows for spurious edges are difficult to distinguish from black arrows in small print; adding a separate panel with FP-only edges or using dashed/solid styles would improve readability.
  4. [References] Several reference entries are incomplete or inconsistently formatted, e.g., [11], [73], and [80] mix 'et al.' styles or omit author lists. A careful reference cleanup is needed.
  5. [§5.1] The sentence describing the filtering result is slightly confusing: 29 families are retained in total, with 21 common and 4 unique to each period, giving p=25 per window. This should be stated more directly to avoid implying 29 per window.
  6. [Reproducibility] The paper does not state whether simulation code or seeds are available. The interactive figures are useful, but providing the underlying analysis code and simulation scripts would strengthen reproducibility, especially given the single-run simulation concern.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: RECON's threshold is unsupervised, benchmark evaluations use external ground truth, and load-bearing citations are to independent groups.

full rationale

RECON's central innovation is the threshold rule in Eq. (19). The threshold is computed entirely from estimated edge strengths: T_j = {||θ̂_jk||_2}, normalized per node to form T̃, clustered by GMM, and separated by the maximum-ratio criterion. This procedure never consults the true adjacency matrix G*, so the simulation 'predictions' (TP/FP/FN) are not fit-renamed-as-prediction; they are evaluated against G* after the fact in Section 4.3. The GRADE comparison uses the same group-LASSO estimates from Eq. (16) and differs only in the post-hoc threshold, so the claimed improvement is a genuine empirical comparison rather than an identity. No load-bearing self-citation appears: the algorithm builds on Chen et al. [11], Henderson & Michailidis [33], Meier et al. [58], and Wu et al. [95], none of whose authors overlap with the present paper, and no 'uniqueness theorem' from prior work by the same authors is invoked. The residual function δ_jk 'assumed to be small in practice' (Section 3.2) and the GMM/max-ratio separation premise (Section 3.4) are assumptions about approximation quality and cluster separability; they are potential correctness or robustness risks—for example, the method is undefined if GMM selects K=1, and no theory guarantees that the largest drop ratio corresponds to the true/spurious boundary. But these are not circular because neither assumption is defined in terms of the true edges being predicted. The paper even acknowledges the difficulty ('it is unclear how small an estimated strength should be'), showing the threshold is not assumed to be known. The headline simulation result may be questioned on design/external-validity grounds, but that is not circularity. I therefore find no step in the derivation chain that reduces to its own input.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

RECON relies on the additive ODE model inherited from GRADE, on dropping basis-expansion residuals, on the shared-subject ODE assumption, and on a heuristic gap assumption in the GMM threshold. No new latent variables or physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • group LASSO penalty lambda_{n,j} = selected by BIC; not reported
    Controls sparsity of the additive ODE coefficients in Eq. (16); chosen per node j from the same data.
  • GMM cluster count K = selected by BIC; not reported
    Number of clusters in the GMM threshold step (Section 3.4); determines the set of candidate gaps evaluated by the maximum-ratio criterion.
  • B-spline basis size M = not reported
    Number of basis functions in Eq. (10); a fixed user choice that affects smoothness and approximation error of the estimated regulatory functions.
  • Number of PACE eigenfunctions A_j = selected by AIC; not reported
    Truncation in Eqs. (6)-(7) used for sparse irregular trajectories; affects the quality of the initial smoothing step.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The true ODE regulatory function f_j is additive: f_j(X) = sum_k f_jk(X_k) (Eq. 8).
    Inherited from GRADE/SA-ODE; known to be violated by product terms such as the Brusselator X_{2q-1}^2 X_{2q}, yet used in all simulations and the real analysis.
  • ad hoc to paper Basis-expansion residual delta_jk is small and its integral is dropped (Section 3.3).
    Eqs. (10)-(12); the estimator omits the summed integral of residuals, so approximation error is silently absorbed into the theta estimates.
  • domain assumption All subjects share one ODE system with subject-specific intercepts (Section 3.1, Eq. 3).
    For the HCT data, patients with different medications, conditioning, and disease states are pooled under a single regulatory law.
  • ad hoc to paper There is a well-separated gap between normalized strengths of true and spurious edges, and the largest GMM gap is the correct cutoff (Section 3.4, Eq. 19).
    This is the load-bearing premise of the new edge-selection step; no theory or sensitivity analysis is provided.
  • domain assumption The ODE model is a valid causal generative model, so inferred edges are causal (Sections 1 and 3.4).
    Observational time series without interventions can be consistent with many causal graphs; 'causal' is asserted rather than established.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 33758 in / 13026 out tokens · 134833 ms · 2026-08-01T06:33:00.668246+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Learning a dynamical system and reconstructing the underlying regulatory network from $p$ discretely observed state trajectories remain challenging problems. Existing approaches often produced a large number of spurious edges and suffered from several methodological limitations. We propose a new approach, Reconstruction of Enhanced Causal Omnidirectional Network (RECON), that leverages an integral-based additive nonparametric ODE model to reconstruct regulatory networks from $p$ time-course data. RECON incorporates five methodological advances. First, it incorporates a new data-driven edge selection procedure that substantially reduces spurious edges while preserving true regulatory edges. Second, it reconstructs an omnidirectional network that captures causal regulatory relationships rather than merely statistical associations or noise artifacts. Third, it substantially broadens the applicability of standard ODE-based approaches by accommodating both dense regular and sparse irregular longitudinal sampling scenarios. Fourth, it models both node trajectories and edge regulatory effects as time-varying functions, emphasizing a dynamic regulatory network. Fifth, it reconstructs a signed and weighted regulatory network and provides comprehensive network interpretation through two-way direction, activatory/inhibitory indicator, and strength, together with keystone node identification and topological structure. Across five simulation studies, RECON consistently outperforms GRADE by removing nearly all spurious edges while retaining nearly all true regulatory edges, resulting in highly accurate network reconstruction. In the most challenging scenario, the number of spurious edges is reduced from 239 to 0.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.21833 by Guifang Fu, Peter T. McKenney, Praveen Niranda.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Network constructed by the GRADE for Simulation 1-II (Section 4.4). True edges are shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: All 29 bacterial families and medication exposure for one representative patient (PatientID 1207), shown for days −10 to +15 relative to transplantation (Day 0). Panel (a): The discretely measured relative abundance values of all bacterial families identified across the pre- and post-HCT study periods, recorded at n = 16 discrete sampling time points. Panel (b): Medication exposure timeline, where each row… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Relative abundance data of one bacterial family ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison of the true and reconstructed networks for Simulation 1-I with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison of the true and reconstructed networks for Simulation 1-II with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Comparison of the true and reconstructed networks for Simulation 2-I with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparison of the true and reconstructed networks for Simulation 2-II with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Comparison of the true and reconstructed networks for Simulation 3-I with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Enhanced Causal Omnidirectional Network reconstructed by RECON for the pre-HCT gut [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The estimated outgoing regulatory functions of the three keystone families in the pre-HCT network [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Enhanced Causal Omnidirectional Network reconstructed by RECON for the post-HCT gut [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The estimated outgoing regulatory functions of the two keystone families in the post-HCT network [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_12.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

108 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    visNetwork: Network Visualization using ’vis.js’ Library, July 2015

    Almende B.V., Benoit Thieurmel, , and Contributors. visNetwork: Network Visualization using ’vis.js’ Library, July 2015. URL https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=visNetwork. Institution: Comprehensive R Archive Network Pages: 2.1.4

    2015

  2. [2]

    Albert-László Barabási and Zoltán N. Oltvai. Network biology: understanding the cell’s functional organization.Nature Reviews Genetics, 5(2):101–113, February 2004. ISSN 1471-0056, 1471-0064. doi: 10.1038/nrg1272. URLhttps://www.nature.com/articles/nrg1272. 27

    doi:10.1038/nrg1272 2004

  3. [3]

    Deciphering microbial interactions and detecting keystone species with co-occurrence networks.Frontiers in Microbiology, 5, May 2014

    David Berry and Stefanie Widder. Deciphering microbial interactions and detecting keystone species with co-occurrence networks.Frontiers in Microbiology, 5, May 2014. ISSN 1664-302X. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00219. URL http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2014. 00219/abstract

    arXiv 2014

  4. [4]

    Fast unfolding of communities in large networks.Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2008 (10):P10008, October 2008

    Vincent D Blondel, Jean-Loup Guillaume, Renaud Lambiotte, and Etienne Lefebvre. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks.Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2008 (10):P10008, October 2008. ISSN 1742-5468. doi: 10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008. URLhttps: //iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008

    doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/p10008 2008

  5. [5]

    A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality*.The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 25(2):163–177, June 2001

    Ulrik Brandes. A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality*.The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 25(2):163–177, June 2001. ISSN 0022-250X, 1545-5874. doi: 10.1080/0022250X.2001.9990249. URL http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0022250X.2001.9990249

    arXiv 2001

  6. [6]

    A. J. Butte and I. S. Kohane. MUTUAL INFORMATION RELEVANCE NETWORKS: FUNCTIONAL GENOMIC CLUSTERING USING PAIRWISE ENTROPY MEASUREMENTS. InBiocomputing 2000, pages 418–429, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, December 1999. WORLD SCIENTIFIC. ISBN 978-981- 02-4188-9 978-981-4447-33-1. doi: 10.1142/9789814447331-0040. URLhttp://www.worldscientific. com/doi/abs/10.1142/97...

    work page doi:10.1142/9789814447331-0040 2000

  7. [7]

    Canny and Beth A

    Geraldine O. Canny and Beth A. McCormick. Bacteria in the Intestine, Helpful Residents or Enemies from Within?Infection and Immunity, 76(8):3360–3373, August 2008. ISSN 0019-9567, 1098-5522. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00187-08. URLhttps://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/IAI.00187-08

    work page doi:10.1128/iai.00187-08 2008

  8. [8]

    Understanding the Mechanisms of Positive Microbial Interactions That Benefit Lactic Acid Bacteria Co-cultures.Frontiers in Microbiology, 11:2088, September 2020

    Fanny Canon, Thibault Nidelet, Eric Guédon, Anne Thierry, and Valérie Gagnaire. Understanding the Mechanisms of Positive Microbial Interactions That Benefit Lactic Acid Bacteria Co-cultures.Frontiers in Microbiology, 11:2088, September 2020. ISSN 1664-302X. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.02088. URL https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2020.02088/full

    arXiv 2088

  9. [9]

    OneNet—One network to rule them all: Consensus network inference from microbiome data.PLOS Computational Biology, 20(12):e1012627, December 2024

    Camille Champion, Raphaëlle Momal, Emmanuelle Le Chatelier, Mathilde Sola, Mahendra Mariadassou, and Magali Berland. OneNet—One network to rule them all: Consensus network inference from microbiome data.PLOS Computational Biology, 20(12):e1012627, December 2024. ISSN 1553-7358. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012627. URLhttps://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012627

    doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012627 2024

  10. [10]

    Inference of single-cell network using mutual information for scRNA-seq data analysis.BMC Bioinformatics, 25(S2):292, Septem- ber 2024

    Lan-Yun Chang, Ting-Yi Hao, Wei-Jie Wang, and Chun-Yu Lin. Inference of single-cell network using mutual information for scRNA-seq data analysis.BMC Bioinformatics, 25(S2):292, Septem- ber 2024. ISSN 1471-2105. doi: 10.1186/s12859-024-05895-3. URL https://bmcbioinformatics. biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12859-024-05895-3

    work page doi:10.1186/s12859-024-05895-3 2024

  11. [11]

    S. Chen, A. Shojaie, et al. Network reconstruction from high-dimensional ordinary differential equations. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 112, 2017. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2016.1229197. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1080/ 01621459.2016.1229197

    arXiv 2017

  12. [12]

    Proposal of names for 329 higher rank taxa defined in the Genome Taxonomy Database under two prokaryotic codes.FEMS Microbiology Letters, 370:fnad071, January 2023

    Maria Chuvochina, Aaron J Mussig, Pierre-Alain Chaumeil, Adam Skarshewski, Christian Rinke, Donovan H Parks, and Philip Hugenholtz. Proposal of names for 329 higher rank taxa defined in the Genome Taxonomy Database under two prokaryotic codes.FEMS Microbiology Letters, 370:fnad071, January 2023. ISSN 1574-6968. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnad071. URL https://aca...

    work page doi:10.1093/femsle/fnad071 2023

  13. [13]

    De Luca and Y

    F. De Luca and Y. Shoenfeld. The microbiome in autoimmune diseases.Clinical and Experimental Immunology, 195(1):74–85, January 2019. ISSN 1365-2249. doi: 10.1111/cei.13158

    work page doi:10.1111/cei.13158 2019

  14. [14]

    De Vries, Rob I

    Franciska T. De Vries, Rob I. Griffiths, Mark Bailey, Hayley Craig, Mariangela Girlanda, Hyun Soon Gweon, Sara Hallin, Aurore Kaisermann, Aidan M. Keith, Marina Kretzschmar, Philippe Lemanceau, Erica Lumini, Kelly E. Mason, Anna Oliver, Nick Ostle, James I. Prosser, Cecile Thion, Bruce Thomson, and Richard D. Bardgett. Soil bacterial networks are less sta...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05516-7 2018

  15. [15]

    Mutual information: a measure of dependency for nonlinear time series.Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 344(1-2):326–329, December 2004

    Andreia Dionisio, Rui Menezes, et al. Mutual information: a measure of dependency for nonlinear time series.Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 344(1-2):326–329, December 2004. ISSN 03784371. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2004.06.144. URL https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/ pii/S0378437104009598

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physa.2004.06.144 2004

  16. [16]

    A method for estimating Hill function-based dynamic models of gene regulatory networks.Royal Society Open Science, 5(2):171226, February 2018

    Faizan Ehsan Elahi and Ammar Hasan. A method for estimating Hill function-based dynamic models of gene regulatory networks.Royal Society Open Science, 5(2):171226, February 2018. ISSN 2054-5703. doi: 10.1098/rsos.171226. URL https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.171226

    work page doi:10.1098/rsos.171226 2018

  17. [17]

    Eubank.Nonparametric regression and spline smoothing

    Randall L. Eubank.Nonparametric regression and spline smoothing. Number 157 in Statistics. M. Dekker, New York, 2nd ed edition, 1999. ISBN 978-0-8247-9337-1

    1999

  18. [18]

    Number v.66 in Chapman and Hall/CRC Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability

    Jianqing Fan and Irène Gijbels.Local Polynomial Modelling and Its Applications: Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability 66. Number v.66 in Chapman and Hall/CRC Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability. Routledge, Boca Raton, 2018. ISBN 978-0-412-98321-4 978-1-351-43481-2

    2018

  19. [19]

    Microbial interactions: from networks to models.Nature Reviews Microbiology, 10(8):538–550, August 2012

    Karoline Faust and Jeroen Raes. Microbial interactions: from networks to models.Nature Reviews Microbiology, 10(8):538–550, August 2012. ISSN 1740-1526, 1740-1534. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2832. URL https://www.nature.com/articles/nrmicro2832

    doi:10.1038/nrmicro2832 2012

  20. [20]

    CoNet app: inference of biological association networks using Cytoscape.F1000Research, 5:1519, October 2016

    Karoline Faust and Jeroen Raes. CoNet app: inference of biological association networks using Cytoscape.F1000Research, 5:1519, October 2016. ISSN 2046-1402. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.9050.2. URLhttps://f1000research.com/articles/5-1519/v2

    work page doi:10.12688/f1000research.9050.2 2016

  21. [21]

    Waters, Sandeep S

    Teng Fei, Tyler Funnell, Nicholas R. Waters, Sandeep S. Raj, Mirae Baichoo, Keimya Sadeghi, Anqi Dai, Oriana Miltiadous, Roni Shouval, Meng Lv, Jonathan U. Peled, Doris M. Ponce, Miguel-Angel Perales, Mithat Gönen, and Marcel R.M. Van Den Brink. Scalable log-ratio lasso regression for enhanced microbial feature selection with FLORAL.Cell Reports Methods, ...

    arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    Waters, Jenny Paredes, Anqi Dai, Francesca Castro, Jennifer Haber, Ana Gradissimo, Sandeep S

    Teng Fei, Victoria Donovan, Tyler Funnell, Mirae Baichoo, Nicholas R. Waters, Jenny Paredes, Anqi Dai, Francesca Castro, Jennifer Haber, Ana Gradissimo, Sandeep S. Raj, Alexander M. Lesokhin, Urvi A. Shah, Marcel R. M. Van Den Brink, and Jonathan U. Peled. Correlating High-dimensional longitudinal microbial features with time-varying outcomes with FLORAL,...

    work page doi:10.1101/2025.02.17.638558 2025

  23. [23]

    Model-Based Clustering, Discriminant Analysis, and Density Estimation.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97(458):611–631, June 2002

    Chris Fraley and Adrian E Raftery. Model-Based Clustering, Discriminant Analysis, and Density Estimation.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97(458):611–631, June 2002. ISSN 0162- 1459, 1537-274X. doi: 10.1198/016214502760047131. URLhttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/ 10.1198/016214502760047131

    doi:10.1198/016214502760047131 2002

  24. [24]

    A comparative analysis of mutual information methods for pairwise relationship detection in metagenomic data.BMC Bioinformatics, 25(1):266, August 2024

    Dallace Francis and Fengzhu Sun. A comparative analysis of mutual information methods for pairwise relationship detection in metagenomic data.BMC Bioinformatics, 25(1):266, August 2024. ISSN 1471-2105. doi: 10.1186/s12859-024-05883-7. URL https://bmcbioinformatics.biomedcentral. com/articles/10.1186/s12859-024-05883-7

    work page doi:10.1186/s12859-024-05883-7 2024

  25. [25]

    Linton C. Freeman. A Set of Measures of Centrality Based on Betweenness.Sociometry, 40(1):35, March 1977. ISSN 00380431. doi: 10.2307/3033543. URLhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3033543? origin=crossref

    arXiv 1977

  26. [26]

    Garrity and John G

    George M. Garrity and John G. Holt. The Road Map to theManual. In William B. Whitman, editor, Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria, pages 1–70. Wiley, 1 edition, September

  27. [27]

    Georg K. Gerber. The dynamic microbiome.FEBS Letters, 588(22):4131–4139, November 2014. ISSN 0014-5793, 1873-3468. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2014.02.037. URLhttps://febs.onlinelibrary.wiley. com/doi/10.1016/j.febslet.2014.02.037. 29

    work page doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2014.02.037 2014

  28. [28]

    Ghahramani

    Z. Ghahramani. Learning dynamic Bayesian networks.Lect. Notes Computer Sci., 1387, 1998. doi: 10.1007/BFb0053999. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0053999

    work page doi:10.1007/bfb0053999 1998

  29. [29]

    Microbial communities as dynamical systems.Current Opinion in Microbiology, 44:41–49, August 2018

    Didier Gonze, Katharine Z Coyte, Leo Lahti, and Karoline Faust. Microbial communities as dynamical systems.Current Opinion in Microbiology, 44:41–49, August 2018. ISSN 13695274. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2018.07.004. URL https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/ pii/S1369527418300092

    work page doi:10.1016/j.mib.2018.07.004 2018

  30. [30]

    Bing Guo, Lei Zhang, Huijuan Sun, Mengjiao Gao, Najiaowa Yu, Qianyi Zhang, Anqi Mou, and Yang Liu. Microbial co-occurrence network topological properties link with reactor parameters and reveal im- portance of low-abundance genera.npj Biofilms and Microbiomes, 8(1):3, January 2022. ISSN 2055-5008. doi: 10.1038/s41522-021-00263-y. URLhttps://www.nature.com...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41522-021-00263-y 2022

  31. [31]

    The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.Radiology, 143(1):29–36, April 1982

    J A Hanley and B J McNeil. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.Radiology, 143(1):29–36, April 1982. ISSN 0033-8419, 1527-1315. doi: 10.1148/radiol- ogy.143.1.7063747. URLhttp://pubs.rsna.org/doi/10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747

    work page doi:10.1148/radiol- 1982

  32. [32]

    Emerging role of the host microbiome in neuropsychiatric disorders: overview and future directions.Molecular Psychiatry, 28(9):3625–3637, September 2023

    Kenji Hashimoto. Emerging role of the host microbiome in neuropsychiatric disorders: overview and future directions.Molecular Psychiatry, 28(9):3625–3637, September 2023. ISSN 1359-4184, 1476-5578. doi: 10.1038/s41380-023-02287-6. URLhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41380-023-02287-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s41380-023-02287-6 2023

  33. [33]

    Henderson and G

    J. Henderson and G. Michailidis. Network reconstruction using nonparametric additive ODE models. PLoS ONE, 9, 2014. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094003. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0094003

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0094003 2014

  34. [34]

    Environmental stress destabilizes microbial networks.The ISME Journal, 15(6):1722–1734, June 2021

    Damian J Hernandez, Aaron S David, Eric S Menges, Christopher A Searcy, and Michelle E Afkhami. Environmental stress destabilizes microbial networks.The ISME Journal, 15(6):1722–1734, June 2021. ISSN 1751-7362, 1751-7370. doi: 10.1038/s41396-020-00882-x. URL https://academic.oup.com/ ismej/article/15/6/1722-1734/7474624

    work page doi:10.1038/s41396-020-00882-x 2021

  35. [35]

    Levine, James L

    Ernst Holler, Peter Butzhammer, Karin Schmid, Christian Hundsrucker, Josef Koestler, Katrin Peter, Wentao Zhu, Daniela Sporrer, Thomas Hehlgans, Marina Kreutz, Barbara Holler, Daniel Wolff, Matthias Edinger, Reinhard Andreesen, John E. Levine, James L. Ferrara, Andre Gessner, Rainer Spang, and Peter J. Oefner. Metagenomic Analysis of the Stool Microbiome ...

    2014

  36. [36]

    Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis: Triggers, Consequences, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Options

    Tomas Hrncir. Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis: Triggers, Consequences, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Options. Microorganisms, 10(3):578, March 2022. ISSN 2076-2607. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10030578. URL https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/10/3/578

    work page doi:10.3390/microorganisms10030578 2022

  37. [37]

    Jenq, Ying Taur, Sean M

    Robert R. Jenq, Ying Taur, Sean M. Devlin, Doris M. Ponce, Jenna D. Goldberg, Katya F. Ahr, Eric R. Littmann, Lilan Ling, Asia C. Gobourne, Liza C. Miller, Melissa D. Docampo, Jonathan U. Peled, Nicholas Arpaia, Justin R. Cross, Tatanisha K. Peets, Melissa A. Lumish, Yusuke Shono, Jarrod A. Dudakov, Hendrik Poeck, Alan M. Hanash, Juliet N. Barker, Miguel-...

  38. [38]

    Johnson, Terence R

    Crystal N. Johnson, Terence R. Whitehead, Michael A. Cotta, Robert E. Rhoades, and Paul A. Lawson. Peptoniphilus stercorisuis sp. nov., isolated from a swine manure storage tank and description of Peptoniphilaceae fam. nov.International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 64 (Pt_10):3538–3545, October 2014. ISSN 1466-5026, 1466-5034. doi:...

    work page doi:10.1099/ijs.0.058941-0 2014

  39. [39]

    doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.04.016

    ISSN 10838791. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.04.016. URLhttps://linkinghub.elsevier.com/ retrieve/pii/S1083879115002931

    work page doi:10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.04.016 2015

  40. [40]

    Blainey, and Jonathan Friedman

    Jared Kehe, Anthony Ortiz, Anthony Kulesa, Jeff Gore, Paul C. Blainey, and Jonathan Friedman. Pos- itive interactions are common among culturable bacteria.Science Advances, 7(45):eabi7159, November

  41. [41]

    A meta-analysis of Boolean network models reveals design principles of gene regulatory networks

    Claus Kadelka, Taras-Michael Butrie, Evan Hilton, Jack Kinseth, Addison Schmidt, and Haris Serdarevic. A meta-analysis of Boolean network models reveals design principles of gene regulatory networks. Science Advances, 10(2):eadj0822, January 2024. ISSN 2375-2548. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adj0822. URL https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adj0822

    doi:10.1126/sciadv.adj0822 2024

  42. [42]

    Hwang, et al

    Mehdi Layeghifard, David M. Hwang, et al. Disentangling Interactions in the Micro- biome: A Network Perspective.Trends in Microbiology, 25(3):217–228, March 2017. ISSN 0966842X. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2016.11.008. URL https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/ pii/S0966842X16301858

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tim.2016.11.008 2017

  43. [43]

    An approach of gene regulatory network construction using mixed entropy optimizing context-related likelihood mutual information.Bioinformatics, 39(1):btac717, January 2023

    Jimeng Lei, Zongheng Cai, Xinyi He, Wanting Zheng, and Jianxiao Liu. An approach of gene regulatory network construction using mixed entropy optimizing context-related likelihood mutual information.Bioinformatics, 39(1):btac717, January 2023. ISSN 1367-4811. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac717. URL https://academic.oup.com/bioinformatics/article/doi/ 10.1...

    work page doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btac717 2023

  44. [44]

    Remodelling the gut ecosystem: a dysbiosis model to elucidate gut- organ axis dynamics in mice.Physiology & Behavior, 299:115000, October 2025

    Krishnapriya, Dayamrita Kollaparampil Kishanchand, Rishikesh, Siddarthan Venkatachalam, Aneesa Painadath Alikunju, Ayswaria Deepti, Unnikrishnan Sivan, and Baby Chakrapani Pu- likkaparambil Sasidharan. Remodelling the gut ecosystem: a dysbiosis model to elucidate gut- organ axis dynamics in mice.Physiology & Behavior, 299:115000, October 2025. ISSN 003193...

    arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Peled, Marcel R

    Chen Liao, Thierry Rolling, Ana Djukovic, Teng Fei, Vishwas Mishra, Hongbin Liu, Chloe Lindberg, Lei Dai, Bing Zhai, Jonathan U. Peled, Marcel R. M. Van Den Brink, Tobias M. Hohl, and Joao B. Xavier. Oral bacteria relative abundance in faeces increases due to gut microbiota depletion and is linked with patient outcomes.Nature Microbiology, 9(6):1555–1565,...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41564-024-01680-3 2024

  46. [46]

    Cesar Ignacio-Espinosa, Simon Roux, Flora Vincent, Lucie Bittner, Youssef Darzi, Jun Wang, Stéphane Audic, Léo Berline, Gianluca Bontempi, Ana M

    Gipsi Lima-Mendez, Karoline Faust, Nicolas Henry, Johan Decelle, Sébastien Colin, Fabrizio Carcillo, Samuel Chaffron, J. Cesar Ignacio-Espinosa, Simon Roux, Flora Vincent, Lucie Bittner, Youssef Darzi, Jun Wang, Stéphane Audic, Léo Berline, Gianluca Bontempi, Ana M. Cabello, Laurent Coppola, Francisco M. Cornejo-Castillo, Francesco d’Ovidio, Luc De Meeste...

    2015

  47. [47]

    Taylor, Camilla Ceccarani, Emily Fontana, Luigi A

    Chen Liao, Bradford P. Taylor, Camilla Ceccarani, Emily Fontana, Luigi A. Amoretti, Roberta J. Wright, Antonio L. C. Gomes, Jonathan U. Peled, Ying Taur, Miguel-Angel Perales, Marcel R. M. Van Den Brink, Eric Littmann, Eric G. Pamer, Jonas Schluter, and Joao B. Xavier. Compilation of longitudinal microbiota data and hospitalome from hematopoietic cell tra...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41597-021-00860-8 2021

  48. [48]

    Statistics and Computing

    Clive Loader.Local Regression and Likelihood. Statistics and Computing. Springer New York, New York, NY, 1999. ISBN 978-0-387-98775-0 978-0-387-22732-0. doi: 10.1007/b98858. URL https: //link.springer.com/10.1007/b98858

    work page doi:10.1007/b98858 1999

  49. [49]

    Tao Lu, Hua Liang, Hongzhe Li, and Hulin Wu. High-Dimensional ODEs Coupled With Mixed- Effects Modeling Techniques for Dynamic Gene Regulatory Network Identification.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 106(496):1242–1258, December 2011. ISSN 0162-1459, 1537-274X. doi: 10.1198/jasa.2011.ap10194. URL http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1198/j...

    work page doi:10.1198/jasa.2011.ap10194 2011

  50. [50]

    Analysis of microbial compositions: a review of normalization and differential abundance analysis.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes, 6(1):60, December 2020

    Huang Lin and Shyamal Das Peddada. Analysis of microbial compositions: a review of normalization and differential abundance analysis.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes, 6(1):60, December 2020. ISSN 2055-5008. doi: 10.1038/s41522-020-00160-w. 31

    work page doi:10.1038/s41522-020-00160-w 2020

  51. [51]

    Progress on network modeling and analysis of gut microecology: a review.Applied and Environmental Microbiology, pages e00092–24, February 2024

    Meng Luo, Jinlin Zhu, Jiajia Jia, Hao Zhang, and Jianxin Zhao. Progress on network modeling and analysis of gut microecology: a review.Applied and Environmental Microbiology, pages e00092–24, February 2024. ISSN 0099-2240, 1098-5336. doi: 10.1128/aem.00092-24. URLhttps://journals.asm. org/doi/10.1128/aem.00092-24

    work page doi:10.1128/aem.00092-24 2024

  52. [52]

    Lutz, Shuang Jiang, Michael L

    Kevin C. Lutz, Shuang Jiang, Michael L. Neugent, Nicole J. De Nisco, Xiaowei Zhan, and Qiwei Li. A Survey of Statistical Methods for Microbiome Data Analysis.Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 8:884810, June 2022. ISSN 2297-4687. doi: 10.3389/fams.2022.884810. URLhttps: //www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fams.2022.884810/full

    arXiv 2022

  53. [53]

    Dynamic interaction network inference from longitudinal microbiome data.Microbiome, 7(1):54, December 2019

    Jose Lugo-Martinez, Daniel Ruiz-Perez, Giri Narasimhan, and Ziv Bar-Joseph. Dynamic interaction network inference from longitudinal microbiome data.Microbiome, 7(1):54, December 2019. ISSN 2049-2618. doi: 10.1186/s40168-019-0660-3. URL https://microbiomejournal.biomedcentral.com/ articles/10.1186/s40168-019-0660-3

    work page doi:10.1186/s40168-019-0660-3 2019

  54. [54]

    Deehan, Jens Walter, and Fredrik Bäckhed

    Kassem Makki, Edward C. Deehan, Jens Walter, and Fredrik Bäckhed. The Impact of Dietary Fiber on Gut Microbiota in Host Health and Disease.Cell Host & Microbe, 23(6):705–715, June 2018. ISSN 19313128. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2018.05.012. URL https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/ pii/S193131281830266X

    work page doi:10.1016/j.chom.2018.05.012 2018

  55. [55]

    Burcham, Jessica L

    Cameron Martino, Amanda Hazel Dilmore, Zachary M. Burcham, Jessica L. Metcalf, Dilip Jeste, and Rob Knight. Microbiota succession throughout life from the cradle to the grave.Nature Reviews Microbiology, 20(12):707–720, December 2022. ISSN 1740-1526, 1740-1534. doi: 10.1038/s41579-022- 00768-z. URLhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41579-022-00768-z

    doi:10.1038/s41579-022- 2022

  56. [56]

    Ziqi Ma, Tao Zuo, Norbert Frey, and Ashraf Yusuf Rangrez. A systematic framework for understanding the microbiome in human health and disease: from basic principles to clinical translation.Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy, 9(1):237, September 2024. ISSN 2059-3635. doi: 10.1038/s41392- 024-01946-6. URLhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41392-024-01946-6

    doi:10.1038/s41392- 2024

  57. [57]

    McGovern and Justin D

    Kyle C. McGovern and Justin D. Silverman. Scale reliant mixed effects models enhance microbiome data analysis.Microbiome, 14(1):117, March 2026. ISSN 2049-2618. doi: 10.1186/s40168-026-02377-x. URLhttps://link.springer.com/10.1186/s40168-026-02377-x

    work page doi:10.1186/s40168-026-02377-x 2026

  58. [58]

    The Group Lasso for Logistic Regression.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 70(1):53–71, February 2008

    Lukas Meier, Sara Van De Geer, et al. The Group Lasso for Logistic Regression.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 70(1):53–71, February 2008. ISSN 1369-7412, 1467-

    2008

  59. [59]

    Matthews

    B.W. Matthews. Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Protein Structure, 405(2):442–451, October 1975. ISSN 00052795. doi: 10.1016/0005-2795(75)90109-9. URL https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/ pii/0005279575901099

    arXiv 1975

  60. [60]

    Tree-based Inference of Species Interaction Network from Abundance Data, 2019

    Raphaëlle Momal, Stéphane Robin, Christophe Ambroise, et al. Tree-based Inference of Species Interaction Network from Abundance Data, 2019. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/1905.02452. Version Number: 2

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  61. [61]

    Springer New York, New York, NY, 2013

    Radhakrishnan Nagarajan, Marco Scutari, et al.Bayesian Networks in R: with Applications in Systems Biology. Springer New York, New York, NY, 2013. ISBN 978-1-4614-6445-7 978-1-4614-6446-4. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-6446-4. URLhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4614-6446-4

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-6446-4 2013

  62. [62]

    Nguyen, Kate A

    Chi L. Nguyen, Kate A. Markey, Oriana Miltiadous, Anqi Dai, Nicholas Waters, Keimya Sadeghi, Teng Fei, Roni Shouval, Bradford P. Taylor, Chen Liao, John B. Slingerland, Ann E. Slingerland, Annelie G. Clurman, Molly A. Maloy, Lauren Bohannon, Paul A. Giardina, Daniel G. Brereton, Gabriel K. Armijo, Emily Fontana, Ana Gradissimo, Boglarka Gyurkocza, Anthony...

    2023

  63. [63]

    Filtering ASVs/OTUs via mutual information- based microbiome network analysis.BMC Bioinformatics, 23(1):380, September 2022

    Elham Bayat Mokhtari and Benjamin Jerry Ridenhour. Filtering ASVs/OTUs via mutual information- based microbiome network analysis.BMC Bioinformatics, 23(1):380, September 2022. ISSN 1471-

    2022

  64. [64]

    Impact of the Gut Microbiota Balance on the Health–Disease Relationship: The Importance of Consum- ingProbioticsandPrebiotics.Foods, 10(6):1261, June2021

    Laura-Berenice Olvera-Rosales, Alma-Elizabeth Cruz-Guerrero, Esther Ramírez-Moreno, Aurora Quintero-Lira, Elizabeth Contreras-López, Judith Jaimez-Ordaz, Araceli Castañeda-Ovando, Javier Añorve-Morga, Zuli-GuadalupeCalderón-Ramos, JoséArias-Rico, andLuis-GuillermoGonzález-Olivares. Impact of the Gut Microbiota Balance on the Health–Disease Relationship: T...

    work page doi:10.3390/foods10061261

  65. [65]

    A multidimensional perspective on microbial interactions.FEMS Microbiology Letters, 366(11):fnz125, June 2019

    Alan R Pacheco and Daniel Segrè. A multidimensional perspective on microbial interactions.FEMS Microbiology Letters, 366(11):fnz125, June 2019. ISSN 1574-6968. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnz125. URL https://academic.oup.com/femsle/article/doi/10.1093/femsle/fnz125/5513995

    work page doi:10.1093/femsle/fnz125 2019

  66. [66]

    Peled, Antonio L.C

    Jonathan U. Peled, Antonio L.C. Gomes, Sean M. Devlin, Eric R. Littmann, Ying Taur, Anthony D. Sung, Daniela Weber, Daigo Hashimoto, Ann E. Slingerland, John B. Slingerland, Molly Maloy, Annelie G. Clurman, Christoph K. Stein-Thoeringer, Kate A. Markey, Melissa D. Docampo, Marina Burgos Da Silva, Niloufer Khan, André Gessner, Julia A. Messina, Kristi Rome...

    2020

  67. [67]

    B. . E. Perrin, L. Ralaivola, A. Mazurie, S. Bottani, J. Mallet, and F. d’Alche Buc. Gene networks infer- ence using dynamic Bayesian networks.Bioinformatics, 19, 2003. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg1071. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg1071

    work page doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg1071 2003

  68. [68]

    MariaNikodemova, ElizabethA.Holzhausen, CourtneyL.Deblois, JodiH.Barnet, PaulE.Peppard, Gar- ret Suen, and Kristen M. Malecki. The effect of low-abundance OTU filtering methods on the reliability and variability of microbial composition assessed by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing.Frontiers in Cellu- lar and Infection Microbiology, 13:1165295, June 2023. ISSN...

    arXiv 2023

  69. [69]

    Prigogine and G

    I. Prigogine and G. Nicolis. On Symmetry-Breaking Instabilities in Dissipative Systems. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 46(9):3542–3550, May 1967. ISSN 0021-9606, 1089-

    1967

  70. [70]

    Bayesian networks.Nature Methods, 12(9):799–800, September 2015

    Jorge López Puga, Martin Krzywinski, et al. Bayesian networks.Nature Methods, 12(9):799–800, September 2015. ISSN 1548-7091, 1548-7105. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3550. URLhttps://www.nature. com/articles/nmeth.3550

    work page doi:10.1038/nmeth.3550 2015

  71. [71]

    Shahzad, Hashir Moheed Kiani, and Muhammad Daud Abdullah Asif

    Awais Qureshi, Abdul Wahid, Shams Qazi, Muhammad K. Shahzad, Hashir Moheed Kiani, and Muhammad Daud Abdullah Asif. DynaBiome: interpretable unsupervised learning of gut microbiome dysbiosis via temporal deep models.BMC Bioinformatics, 27(1):71, February 2026. ISSN 1471-2105. doi: 10.1186/s12859-026-06400-8. URLhttps://link.springer.com/10.1186/s12859-026-06400-8

    work page doi:10.1186/s12859-026-06400-8 2026

  72. [72]

    Global stabilization of Boolean networks with applications to biomolec- ular network control.Scientific Reports, 15(1):15201, April 2025

    Mohammad Reza Rafimanzelat. Global stabilization of Boolean networks with applications to biomolec- ular network control.Scientific Reports, 15(1):15201, April 2025. ISSN 2045-2322. doi: 10.1038/s41598- 025-97684-y. URLhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-97684-y

    doi:10.1038/s41598- 2025

  73. [73]

    Pickard, Melody Y

    Joseph M. Pickard, Melody Y. Zeng, Roberta Caruso, and Gabriel Núñez. Gut microbiota: Role in pathogen colonization, immune responses, and inflammatory disease.Immunological Reviews, 279(1):70–89, September 2017. ISSN 0105-2896, 1600-065X. doi: 10.1111/imr.12567. URL https: //onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/imr.12567. 33

    work page doi:10.1111/imr.12567 2017

  74. [74]

    Alice Risely, Mark A. F. Gillingham, Arnaud Béchet, Stefan Brändel, Alexander C. Heni, Marco Heurich, Sebastian Menke, Marta B. Manser, Marco Tschapka, Wasimuddin, and Simone Sommer. Phylogeny- and Abundance-Based Metrics Allow for the Consistent Comparison of Core Gut Microbiome Diversity Indices Across Host Species.Frontiers in Microbiology, 12:659918, ...

    arXiv 2021

  75. [75]

    Evolution, human-microbe interactions, and life history plasticity.The Lancet, 390(10093):521–530, July

    Graham Rook, Fredrik Bäckhed, Bruce R Levin, Margaret J McFall-Ngai, and Angela R McLean. Evolution, human-microbe interactions, and life history plasticity.The Lancet, 390(10093):521–530, July

  76. [76]

    Diversity of bacteria within the human gut and its contribution to the functional unity of holobionts.npj Biofilms and Microbiomes, 10(1):134, November 2024

    Eugene Rosenberg. Diversity of bacteria within the human gut and its contribution to the functional unity of holobionts.npj Biofilms and Microbiomes, 10(1):134, November 2024. ISSN 2055-5008. doi: 10.1038/s41522-024-00580-y. URLhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41522-024-00580-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41522-024-00580-y 2024

  77. [77]

    Dynamic Bayesian Networks for Integrating Multi-omics Time Series Mi- crobiome Data.mSystems, 6(2):e01105–20, March 2021

    Daniel Ruiz-Perez, Jose Lugo-Martinez, Natalia Bourguignon, Kalai Mathee, Betiana Lerner, Ziv Bar- Joseph, and Giri Narasimhan. Dynamic Bayesian Networks for Integrating Multi-omics Time Series Mi- crobiome Data.mSystems, 6(2):e01105–20, March 2021. ISSN 2379-5077. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.01105- 20

    work page doi:10.1128/msystems.01105- 2021

  78. [78]

    Inferring directional relationships in microbial communities using signed Bayesian networks.BMC Genomics, 21(S6):663, December 2020

    Musfiqur Sazal, Kalai Mathee, Daniel Ruiz-Perez, Trevor Cickovski, and Giri Narasimhan. Inferring directional relationships in microbial communities using signed Bayesian networks.BMC Genomics, 21(S6):663, December 2020. ISSN 1471-2164. doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-07065-0. URL https:// bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12864-020-07065-0

    work page doi:10.1186/s12864-020-07065-0 2020

  79. [79]

    Sparse Additive Models.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 71(5):1009–1030, November 2009

    Pradeep Ravikumar, John Lafferty, Han Liu, and Larry Wasserman. Sparse Additive Models.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 71(5):1009–1030, November 2009. ISSN 1369-7412, 1467-9868. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2009.00718.x. URLhttps://academic.oup.com/ jrsssb/article/71/5/1009/7092930

    arXiv 2009

  80. [80]

    Brendan Murphy, and Adrian E

    Luca Scrucca, Michael Fop, T. Brendan Murphy, and Adrian E. Raftery. mclust 5: Clustering, Classification and Density Estimation Using Gaussian Finite Mixture Models.The R Journal, 8(1): 289–317, August 2016. ISSN 2073-4859

    2016

Showing first 80 references.