Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 98 references

The paper derives a dilute-limit Langevin description in which every force, damping, and noise coefficient of an arbitrary intruder is a boundary integral, and a dense-limit chiral Stokes equation with edge currents.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 00:02 UTC pith:NWSYRVQS

load-bearing objection A genuinely useful geometry-to-coefficient program for chiral intruders, but the Letter is not self-contained and the linear-Langevin claim needs a small-velocity caveat. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.23221 v1 pith:NWSYRVQS submitted 2026-07-25 cond-mat.stat-mech cond-mat.softphysics.flu-dyn

Chiral Dynamics of an Intruder across Dilute and Hydrodynamic Regimes

Rapha\"el Maire , Ignacio Pagonabarraga This is my paper
classification cond-mat.stat-mech cond-mat.softphysics.flu-dyn
keywords chiral active matterintruder dynamicsBoltzmann-Lorentz equationshape-dependent transportodd diffusivityratchet effectchiral Stokes equationedge currents
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tries to establish that, in a dilute nonequilibrium bath, the chiral dynamics of an intruder of arbitrary shape is fixed by its boundary: every force, damping, and noise coefficient in the effective Langevin equation is a line integral over the intruder's perimeter, so shape alone decides which chiral couplings exist, how they transform, and how they scale. It then argues that this kinetic description fails once the bath mean free path approaches the intruder size, and that the dense regime is instead captured by a Stokes equation carrying a chiral torque density, with edge currents and pressure gradients around corners producing the response. If right, this gives a first-principles bridge from an intruder's geometric boundary to its effective chiral transport, and it locates odd response in collision-level physics at low density versus collective hydrodynamic feedback at high density.

Core claim

In the dilute regime, for a convex intruder with inertia much larger than the bath-particle inertia, the paper derives a linear Langevin equation whose coefficients are boundary integrals of the intruder shape. Normal dissipative collisions make the translational drag matrix symmetric and obey a fluctuation-dissipation relation with the intruder's own temperature; chiral collision impulses add an antisymmetric drag contribution proportional to the intruder perimeter, which is the kinetic source of odd diffusivity. Translation-rotation couplings vanish for any shape with an n-fold rotational symmetry, and fluctuation-driven ratchet forces appear only for polar or chiral shapes when the intrud

What carries the argument

The central object is the kinetic Boltzmann-Lorentz equation for the intruder's probability density, built from a microscopic collision rule with normal restitution alpha and a chiral tangential impulse Delta. A systematic expansion with a Gaussian closure turns it into the Langevin equation, and every coefficient factorizes into a dimensional prefactor times a line integral over the intruder boundary: Q_ab = ∮ ds n_a n_b, the lever-arm scalars κ_n = (r0 × n)_z and κ_t = (r0 × t)_z, and their products. These boundary integrals are the load-bearing map: they determine which couplings are nonzero, whether they are symmetric or antisymmetric, and how they scale with density. In the dense regime

Load-bearing premise

The derivation assumes that a systematic expansion with Gaussian closure of the kinetic equation yields an exact, memory-free, linear Langevin equation whose coefficients are precisely those boundary integrals; the paper states this step and defers the derivation to a companion paper, and its own notes say higher-order corrections add non-Gaussian noise and nonlinearities.

What would settle it

In a dilute, Gaussian, achiral bath with no chiral intruder-bath coupling, measure the antisymmetric part of the translational drag matrix and the odd diffusivity as functions of bath density for a chiral wheel. The paper's dilute theory predicts Γ_ab symmetric and D_odd = 0 at leading order, with any residual odd response scaling as n_b^2. If D_odd scales linearly with density, or Γ_xy remains nonzero as n_b → 0, the kinetic-plus-closure bridge is wrong.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Shape becomes a design handle: choosing a polar, chiral, or N-fold-symmetric boundary switches specific Langevin couplings on or off, so the formulas can be used directly to design ratchets and odd-transport devices.
  • The fluctuation-driven ratchet force is proportional to T_b − T_I and vanishes for a Gaussian bath with elastic collisions, so measuring that force isolates the intruder's effective temperature T_I.
  • In an achiral bath, odd diffusivity appears only as a collective effect scaling as n_b^2 and vanishes in the dilute limit, giving a density signature that distinguishes collision-level chirality from collective chirality.
  • In a dense chiral bath, torque on a fixed intruder comes from pressure gradients around corners rather than from direct tangential traction, so the torque is non-monotonic in the number of sides and vanishes for a circle.
  • The kinetic-to-hydrodynamic crossover is marked by a change from Epstein-style to Stokes-style drag as the bath mean free path approaches the intruder size.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the boundary-integral map is exact, measured Langevin coefficients could be inverted to reconstruct shape information about an intruder, giving a new probe for non-convex or rough inclusions from their transport alone.
  • The predicted n_b^2 scaling of odd diffusivity is a sharp experimental signature: because the dilute kinetic theory gives zero, observing that scaling would directly confirm that collective bath-intruder correlations, not single collisions, create that response.
  • The dense-limit mechanism suggests chiral baths could sort particles by shape without any chiral surface interaction, since the pressure-gradient torque depends on corner geometry; torque measurements on regular n-gons provide a direct test.
  • The clearest breakdown point of the dilute theory is strongly non-Gaussian baths or large chiral injection, where the Gaussian closure should fail and non-Gaussian noise and nonlinearities should appear; numerical or experimental noise statistics there would delimit the theory.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a minimal collisional model for a rigid intruder of arbitrary shape in a 2D bath, with chirality entering through a tangential impulse at intruder–bath collisions and through a chiral torque density in bath–bath collisions. The central claims are: (i) in the dilute regime, a Boltzmann–Lorentz equation can be reduced to a linear Langevin equation (Eq. 7) whose coefficients (damping, noise, and forces) are determined by boundary integrals of the intruder shape, as summarized in Table I; (ii) in the dense regime, the intruder dynamics is governed by a chiral Stokes equation with a torque density, leading to edge currents and shape-dependent torques; and (iii) these two regimes are connected by a density-controlled crossover. The manuscript includes simulations of the Boltzmann–Lorentz process (Fig. 1), event-driven molecular dynamics of an explicit bath (Fig. 2), and fixed-intruder hydrodynamical simulations (Fig. 3). The dilute simulations appear consistent with the stated theory at the level presented, and the dense results are qualitative.

Significance. If the central derivation holds, the paper would provide a valuable, explicit connection between intruder geometry and chiral transport coefficients, going beyond symmetry-based classifications and identifying the distinct microscopic mechanisms of odd response in dilute versus dense baths. The manuscript is well organized and the simulation methodology is described in useful detail. It is also a strength that no fitting of the theory to the simulation data is visible; the coefficients are stated to follow from the collision model. However, the paper's main analytical results are not actually derived in the manuscript: the Langevin equation, the complete prefactors in Table I, the fluctuation–dissipation relations, and the chiral Stokes solution are all deferred to a companion paper [72]. Furthermore, the reduction to a linear Langevin equation with constant coefficients requires a small-velocity linearization that is neither stated nor justified. As submitted, the central claims therefore cannot be fully verified from the text.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 'Chiral Boltzmann–Lorentz', Eq. (7); SM Eqs. (22)–(26)] The claim that Eq. (7) with constant F, Γ, D follows from Eq. (6) is not supported by the text. A van Kampen expansion can justify truncating the Kramers–Moyal expansion, but the collision-rate function Ψ(U_{n,i}, v_th) in SM Eq. (26) is nonlinear in the intruder velocity U. The resulting drift is therefore generally U-dependent; an additional small-U/v_th expansion is needed to obtain the linear form (7). The stated validity conditions m/M≪1 and mL²/I≪1 control the size of velocity jumps per collision, not the magnitude of the steady-state intruder velocity relative to v_th. At the finite chiral drive used in Fig. 1 (Δ/√(T_b/m)=0.1) the effect may be small, but the abstract claims 'full chiral dynamics' without a quantitative criterion. The sentence 'Higher-order corrections generate nonlinearities and non-Gaussian noise' acknowledges the issue but does not specify when those correction
  2. [Introduction; Ref. [72]] The derivation of Eq. (7), the complete prefactors in Table I, the fluctuation–dissipation relations including Eq. (8), and the chiral Stokes solution used for Fig. 3 are all deferred to companion paper [72], which is not available: no arXiv identifier or supplementary file is provided. The submitted manuscript is therefore not self-contained for its central analytical claims. The reader can verify the simulations but not the theory. Since the paper's primary contribution is exactly this derivation, the absence of the companion makes the claims uncheckable. The authors should either include the derivation in the Supplemental Material or provide the companion preprint with a working link.
  3. [Sec. 'Hydrodynamics'; Fig. 3] The dense-regime conclusion that torque-driven edge currents dominate the chiral response is only qualitative: the text says 'we qualitatively capture ... in the companion paper [72]' and 'we can likewise show ... [72]'. No quantitative comparison is shown in the Letter. Moreover, the fixed-intruder simulations (I→∞, M→∞) of Fig. 3 test the force on a stationary obstacle, not the 'dynamics of the intruder' announced in the abstract. The crossover from dilute kinetics to hydrodynamics would be more convincing if at least one dense-regime prediction were displayed and compared with simulation, even approximately.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 1 and Fig. 2 captions] The chiral wheel geometry is described by 'adjacent vertices separated by angles π(1±1)/5' (Fig. 1) and 'π(1±1/2)/5' (Fig. 2). These expressions are confusing and likely contain typos; please give an unambiguous definition of the vertex angles.
  2. [Eq. (7)] The notation √D is ambiguous for a matrix. Please specify the matrix square root convention (e.g., the Cholesky factor) or state the noise covariance explicitly.
  3. [Reference [72]] Reference [72] is listed as 'Companion paper (2026)' with no arXiv number or journal submission status. If it is available online, a link would greatly help the reader.
  4. [SM, 'Estimation of the Kramers–Moyal coefficients'] The description of the weighted least-squares fit is useful, but the text does not state how many realizations were used for the estimates in Fig. 1 or how error bars were obtained. Please add this information.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the central Langevin and hydrodynamic results are model-derived and simulation-checked; self-citations to companion papers are present but not the sole support.

full rationale

The derivation chain begins from an explicit collision rule (Eqs. 3-5), especially the tangential impulse J_t=2Delta/lambda_t, which is a model input, not a fitted parameter or a renamed output. Eq. (6) defines the Boltzmann-Lorentz process; Eq. (7) is claimed to follow by van Kampen expansion and Gaussian closure, with details deferred to companion [72]. That is a self-citation, but the Letter does not stop there: Fig. 1 directly measures the Kramers-Moyal coefficients from Gillespie simulation of the same collision process and compares with the cited analytical expressions, and Fig. 2 compares with explicit event-driven bath simulations using measured bath moments; no coefficient is fitted to the data being predicted. The dense-regime torque density tau in [88] and the chiral-Stokes comparison in [72] are also self-citations, but Fig. 3 directly simulates the chiral bath and demonstrates the torque from pressure gradients, so the dense mechanism is not asserted solely by citation. The nonlinear-in-U collision rate in SM Eq. (22) (Psi(U,v_th) is nonlinear) means Eq. (7)'s constant-coefficient linear form is valid only for intruder velocities small compared with v_th; the paper explicitly acknowledges higher-order corrections and non-Gaussian noise. This is a validity-domain/correctness concern, not a circular reduction. No step in the paper reduces to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 6 axioms · 2 invented entities

The predictive content rests on choosing a chiral collision rule and coarse-graining it. Δ, α, n_b, γ are inputs, not fitted to an external benchmark; the dense torque density is imported from a self-cited kinetic theory. No new physical entity with independent evidence is introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • Chiral drive Δ (intruder–bath transverse impulse amplitude) = 0 or 0.1 sqrt(T_b/m); also Δ_b, Δ∥_b for bath–bath collisions
    Model input that sets handedness and magnitude of all chiral responses; central results are parametric in it.
  • Restitution coefficients α, α_b = α scanned 0–1; α_b = 0.5 or 0.8 in dense runs
    Dissipation parameters; Fig. 1 theory curves are functions of α, so exact values are chosen per simulation.
  • Bath number density n_b = n_b r^2 = 10^-3 (dilute) up to n_b πσ^2 = 0.3 (dense)
    Control parameter sweeping dilute-to-dense crossover; the central claim is a function of n_b.
  • Langevin relaxation rate γ on bath particles = γ^{-1} about ten mean free-flight times
    Introduced to prevent divergence of D with system size; directly affects measured even/odd diffusivities.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Dilute limit: bath velocity distribution f(v) is homogeneous and unperturbed by the intruder; successive collisions are uncorrelated.
    Justifies Boltzmann-Lorentz equation (6); the paper acknowledges breakdown at finite density, but the D_odd plateau at low n_b challenges it even in the dilute regime.
  • domain assumption van Kampen expansion and Gaussian closure of Eq. (6) yield the linear Langevin equation (7) with white noise.
    Central coarse-graining step; not derived in the Letter, deferred to companion [72]; higher-order corrections acknowledged.
  • domain assumption Small bath-particle inertia: m/M << 1 and mL^2/I << 1.
    Stated validity condition for Eq. (7).
  • ad hoc to paper Chirality is implemented solely via the tangential impulse J_t = 2Δ/λ_t (Eq. 4); no rough-contact or other transverse mechanism is included.
    Modeling choice interpreted as active-spinner contribution; no microscopic derivation in the Letter.
  • ad hoc to paper Bath-bath chiral impulse J_t^{(b)} = mΔ_b generates a torque density τ (from [88]) entering a chiral Stokes equation.
    Dense-regime input is an emergent quantity from the authors' own prior kinetic theory; not re-derived here.
  • domain assumption Perfect slip at the intruder-bath contact for Δ = 0 and neglect of viscous normal traction in Eq. (9).
    Used to write F_φ = -∮ (r0×n)_z p; stated in text but not quantitatively justified.
invented entities (2)
  • Chiral tangential impulse J_t = 2Δ/λ_t at intruder-bath collisions no independent evidence
    purpose: Injects handedness into the collision rule and drives chiral translation/rotation in the dilute regime
    Postulated effective collision rule attributed to active spinners [73]; no independent measurement or falsifiable handle beyond the model's own simulations.
  • Tangential bath-bath impulse J_t^{(b)} = mΔ_b no independent evidence
    purpose: Creates the chiral torque density that drives edge currents around a fixed intruder in the dense regime
    Postulated interaction; the torque density is computed in the authors' kinetic theory [88], not measured externally.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 15846 in / 19853 out tokens · 175946 ms · 2026-08-01T00:02:37.340182+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We introduce and simulate an analytically tractable model for an intruder of arbitrary shape in a nonequilibrium bath, with chirality originating from the bath, the intruder, or their coupling. In the dilute regime, a Langevin description derived from a Boltzmann-Lorentz equation shows how intruder geometry governs ratchet effects and odd response. In the dense regime, the dynamics of the intruder are instead governed by the hydrodynamic modes of the bath and edge currents, which are described by a Stokes equation including a chiral torque density. Our results link shape to chiral transport and show that odd response arises from distinct mechanisms in the dilute and dense limits.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.23221 by Ignacio Pagonabarraga, Rapha\"el Maire.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: In short, we showed analytically how intruder geometry controls the allowed couplings in the dilute regime. Direct bath simulation—To go beyond the dilute, homogeneous-bath limit, we simulate the full intruder￾bath system by event-driven molecular dynamics [79], with bath particles of diameter σ; details are given in the SM [76]. Our first result is that the dilute, homogeneous￾bath prediction is recovered… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Chiral bath around a fixed intruder. (a) Pressure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

98 extracted references · 6 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    U. M. B. Marconi, A. Puglisi, L. Rondoni, and A. Vulpi- ani, Fluctuation–dissipation: response theory in statisti- cal physics, Physics reports461, 111 (2008)

    2008

  2. [2]

    Zwanzig,Nonequilibrium statistical mechanics(Ox- ford University Press, 2001)

    R. Zwanzig,Nonequilibrium statistical mechanics(Ox- ford University Press, 2001)

    2001

  3. [3]

    Van Kampen and I

    N. Van Kampen and I. Oppenheim, Brownian motion as a problem of eliminating fast variables, Physica A: Sta- tistical Mechanics and its Applications138, 231 (1986)

    1986

  4. [4]

    N. G. Van Kampen,Stochastic processes in physics and chemistry, Vol. 1 (Elsevier, 1992)

    1992

  5. [5]

    Widom, Velocity fluctuations of a hard-core brownian particle, Physical Review A3, 1394 (1971)

    A. Widom, Velocity fluctuations of a hard-core brownian particle, Physical Review A3, 1394 (1971)

    1971

  6. [6]

    Costantini, U

    G. Costantini, U. Marini Bettolo Marconi, and A. Puglisi, Granular brownian ratchet model, Physical Review E75, 061124 (2007)

    2007

  7. [7]

    A. V. Plyukhin, Langevin equations with non-gaussian thermal noise: Valid but superfluous, Physical Review E 113, 014139 (2026)

    2026

  8. [8]

    Plyukhin, Does a brownian particle equilibrate?, Eu- rophysics Letters75, 15 (2006)

    A. Plyukhin, Does a brownian particle equilibrate?, Eu- rophysics Letters75, 15 (2006)

    2006

  9. [9]

    H¨ anggi and F

    P. H¨ anggi and F. Marchesoni, Artificial brownian mo- tors: Controlling transport on the nanoscale, Reviews of Modern Physics81, 387 (2009)

    2009

  10. [10]

    Eshuis, K

    P. Eshuis, K. van der Weele, D. Lohse, and D. van der Meer, Experimental realization of a rotational ratchet in a granular gas, Physical Review Letters104, 248001 (2010)

    2010

  11. [11]

    Gnoli, A

    A. Gnoli, A. Petri, F. Dalton, G. Pontuale, G. Gradenigo, A. Sarracino, and A. Puglisi, Brownian ratchet in a ther- mal bath driven by coulomb friction, Physical Review Letters110, 120601 (2013)

    2013

  12. [12]

    Plati and A

    A. Plati and A. Puglisi, Collective drifts in vibrated gran- ular packings: the interplay of friction and structure, Physical Review Letters128, 208001 (2022)

    2022

  13. [13]

    Plati, A

    A. Plati, A. Baldassarri, A. Gnoli, G. Gradenigo, and A. Puglisi, Dynamical collective memory in fluidized granular materials, Physical review letters123, 038002 (2019)

    2019

  14. [14]

    Manacorda, A

    A. Manacorda, A. Puglisi, and A. Sarracino, Coulomb friction driving brownian motors, Communications in Theoretical Physics62, 505 (2014)

    2014

  15. [15]

    Sarracino, A

    A. Sarracino, A. Gnoli, and A. Puglisi, Ratchet effect driven by coulomb friction: the asymmetric rayleigh pis- ton, Physical Review E87, 040101 (2013)

    2013

  16. [16]

    Sarracino, A

    A. Sarracino, A. Puglisi, and A. Vulpiani,Nonequilib- rium Statistical Mechanics: Basic concepts, models and applications(IOP Publishing, 2025)

    2025

  17. [17]

    Talbot, R

    J. Talbot, R. D. Wildman, and P. Viot, Kinetics of a frictional granular motor, Physical Review Letters107, 138001 (2011)

    2011

  18. [18]

    Sarracino, D

    A. Sarracino, D. Villamaina, G. Costantini, and A. Puglisi, Granular brownian motion, Journal of Statis- tical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2010, P04013 (2010)

    2010

  19. [19]

    Lucente, M

    D. Lucente, M. Viale, A. Gnoli, A. Puglisi, and A. Vulpi- ani, Revealing the nonequilibrium nature of a granular intruder: the crucial role of non-gaussian behavior, Phys- ical Review Letters131, 078201 (2023)

    2023

  20. [20]

    D. G. M´ endez and V. Garz´ o, Nonlinear transport of tracer particles immersed in a strongly sheared dilute gas with inelastic collisions, Mathematics14, 179 (2026)

    2026

  21. [21]

    A. M. Puertas and R. G´ omez Gonz´ alez, Tracer diffusion in granular suspensions: Testing the enskog kinetic the- ory with direct-simulation monte carlo and molecular dy- namics, Phys. Rev. E113, 035414 (2026)

    2026

  22. [22]

    Puglisi and D

    A. Puglisi and D. Villamaina, Irreversible effects of mem- ory, EPL (Europhysics Letters)88, 30004 (2009)

    2009

  23. [23]

    M. C. Marchetti, J.-F. Joanny, S. Ramaswamy, T. B. Liverpool, J. Prost, M. Rao, and R. A. Simha, Hydrody- namics of soft active matter, Reviews of modern physics 85, 1143 (2013)

    2013

  24. [24]

    Angelani, A

    L. Angelani, A. Costanzo, and R. Di Leonardo, Active ratchets, EPL (Europhysics Letters)96, 68002 (2011)

    2011

  25. [25]

    C. O. Reichhardt and C. Reichhardt, Ratchet effects in active matter systems, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics8, 51 (2017)

    2017

  26. [26]

    Krishnamurthy, S

    S. Krishnamurthy, S. Ghosh, D. Chatterji, R. Ganapa- thy, and A. Sood, A micrometre-sized heat engine op- erating between bacterial reservoirs, Nature Physics12, 1134 (2016)

    2016

  27. [27]

    Anand, X

    S. Anand, X. Ma, S. Guo, S. Martiniani, and X. Cheng, Transport and energetics of bacterial rectification, Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences121, e2411608121 (2024). 6

    2024

  28. [28]

    Metzger, S

    J. Metzger, S. Ro, and J. Tailleur, Exceptions to the ratchet principle in active and passive stochastic dynam- ics, arXiv:2503.11902 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Bechinger, R

    C. Bechinger, R. Di Leonardo, H. L¨ owen, C. Reichhardt, G. Volpe, and G. Volpe, Active particles in complex and crowded environments, Reviews of modern physics88, 045006 (2016)

    2016

  30. [30]

    Guidobaldi, Y

    A. Guidobaldi, Y. Jeyaram, I. Berdakin, V. V. Moshchalkov, C. A. Condat, V. I. Marconi, L. Giojalas, and A. V. Silhanek, Geometrical guidance and trapping transition of human sperm cells, Physical Review E89, 032720 (2014)

    2014

  31. [31]

    Ai and J.-C

    B.-Q. Ai and J.-C. Wu, Transport of active ellipsoidal particles in ratchet potentials, The Journal of Chemical Physics140(2014)

    2014

  32. [32]

    J. Shea, G. Jung, and F. Schmid, Force renormalization for probes immersed in an active bath, Soft Matter20, 1767 (2024)

    2024

  33. [33]

    Uchida, D

    Y. Uchida, D. Nishiguchi, and K. A. Takeuchi, Design- ing topological edge states in bacterial active matter, arXiv:2601.08243 (2026)

    arXiv 2026

  34. [34]

    Alston, R

    H. Alston, R. Voituriez, and T. Bertrand, Stochastic pair- wise forces enhance tracer diffusion in nonmotile active matter, Physical Review Letters136, 128303 (2026)

    2026

  35. [35]

    Benois, M

    A. Benois, M. Jardat, V. Dahirel, V. D´ emery, J. Agudo- Canalejo, R. Golestanian, and P. Illien, Enhanced diffu- sion of tracer particles in nonreciprocal mixtures, Physi- cal Review E108, 054606 (2023)

    2023

  36. [36]

    Granek, Y

    O. Granek, Y. Kafri, and J. Tailleur, Anomalous trans- port of tracers in active baths, Physical Review Letters 129, 038001 (2022)

    2022

  37. [37]

    D´ emery and D

    V. D´ emery and D. S. Dean, Perturbative path-integral study of active-and passive-tracer diffusion in fluctuating fields, Physical Review E84, 011148 (2011)

    2011

  38. [38]

    D. S. Dean and V. D´ emery, Diffusion of active tracers in fluctuating fields, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 23, 234114 (2011)

    2011

  39. [39]

    Granek, Y

    O. Granek, Y. Kafri, M. Kardar, S. Ro, J. Tailleur, and A. Solon, Colloquium: Inclusions, boundaries, and disor- der in scalar active matter, Reviews of Modern Physics 96, 031003 (2024)

    2024

  40. [40]

    Fruchart, C

    M. Fruchart, C. Scheibner, and V. Vitelli, Odd viscosity and odd elasticity, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics14, 471 (2023)

    2023

  41. [41]

    Liebchen and D

    B. Liebchen and D. Levis, Chiral active matter, Euro- physics Letters139, 67001 (2022)

    2022

  42. [42]

    L¨ owen, Chirality in microswimmer motion: From cir- cle swimmers to active turbulence, The European Phys- ical Journal Special Topics225, 2319 (2016)

    H. L¨ owen, Chirality in microswimmer motion: From cir- cle swimmers to active turbulence, The European Phys- ical Journal Special Topics225, 2319 (2016)

    2016

  43. [43]

    Levis, I

    D. Levis, I. Pagonabarraga, and B. Liebchen, Activity induced synchronization: Mutual flocking and chiral self- sorting, Physical Review Research1, 023026 (2019)

    2019

  44. [44]

    Digregorio, I

    P. Digregorio, I. Pagonabarraga, and F. Vega Reyes, Phase separation in a chiral active fluid of inertial self- spinning disks, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 218301 (2026)

    2026

  45. [45]

    Guo, M.-z

    R.-x. Guo, M.-z. Dai, J.-j. Li, and B.-q. Ai, Tuning nonequilibrium phases with odd forces: From crystalline order to vortex structures in systems with competing in- teractions, Physical Review E113, 024110 (2026)

    2026

  46. [46]

    Caprini and U

    L. Caprini and U. Marini Bettolo Marconi, Bubble phase induced by odd interactions in chiral systems, The Jour- nal of Chemical Physics162, 161101 (2025)

    2025

  47. [47]

    Huang, W

    M. Huang, W. Hu, S. Yang, Q.-X. Liu, and H. Zhang, Circular swimming motility and disordered hyperuniform state in an algae system, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118, e2100493118 (2021)

    2021

  48. [48]

    Musacchio, A

    M. Musacchio, A. P. Antonov, H. L¨ owen, and L. Caprini, Circling crystals in chiral active matter with self- alignment, Soft Matter (2026)

    2026

  49. [49]

    T. H. Tan, A. Mietke, J. Li, Y. Chen, H. Higinbotham, P. J. Foster, S. Gokhale, J. Dunkel, and N. Fakhri, Odd dynamics of living chiral crystals, Nature607, 287 (2022)

    2022

  50. [50]

    Siebers, A

    F. Siebers, A. Jayaram, P. Bl¨ umler, and T. Speck, Ex- ploiting compositional disorder in collectives of light- driven circle walkers, Science Advances9, eadf5443 (2023)

    2023

  51. [51]

    Caprini, I

    L. Caprini, I. Abdoli, U. Marini Bettolo Marconi, and H. L¨ owen, Spontaneous self-wrapping in chiral active polymers, Newton1, 100253 (2025)

    2025

  52. [52]

    Kuroda and K

    Y. Kuroda and K. Miyazaki, Microscopic theory for hype- runiformity in two-dimensional chiral active fluid, Jour- nal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2023, 103203 (2023)

    2023

  53. [53]

    Kuroda, T

    Y. Kuroda, T. Kawasaki, and K. Miyazaki, Singular den- sity correlations in chiral active fluids in three dimen- sions, Physical Review E112, 045426 (2025)

    2025

  54. [54]

    Maitra and M

    A. Maitra and M. Lenz, Spontaneous rotation can sta- bilise ordered chiral active fluids, Nature communications 10, 920 (2019)

    2019

  55. [55]

    Kuroda, E

    Y. Kuroda, E. Meyberg, G. Gardi, T. Speck, and S. Osat, Designing topological edge currents in chiral active mat- ter, arXiv:2606.31840 (2026)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  56. [56]

    Burekovi´ c, S

    S. Burekovi´ c, S. Kole, A. Maitra, and C. Nardini, Bulk and microphase separation in chiral active systems, arXiv:2607.12045 (2026)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  57. [57]

    S. Chen, D. E. G¨ okmen, M. Fruchart, M. Krumbein, P. Silberzan, V. Yashunsky, and V. Vitelli, Chiral- ity across scales in tissue dynamics, arXiv:2506.12276 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    Yashunsky, D

    V. Yashunsky, D. Pearce, C. Blanch-Mercader, F. As- cione, P. Silberzan, and L. Giomi, Chiral edge current in nematic cell monolayers, Physical Review X12, 041017 (2022)

    2022

  59. [59]

    Inaki, J

    M. Inaki, J. Liu, and K. Matsuno, Cell chirality: its origin and roles in left–right asymmetric development, Philo- sophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences371(2016)

    2016

  60. [60]

    T. Juan, C. G´ eminard, J.-B. Coutelis, D. Cerezo, S. Pol` es, S. Noselli, and M. F¨ urthauer, Myosin1d is an evolutionarily conserved regulator of animal left–right asymmetry, Nature communications9, 1942 (2018)

    1942

  61. [61]

    Di Leonardo, D

    R. Di Leonardo, D. Dell’Arciprete, L. Angelani, and V. Iebba, Swimming with an image, Physical Review Let- ters106, 038101 (2011)

    2011

  62. [62]

    Grober, I

    D. Grober, I. Palaia, M. C. U¸ car, E. Hannezo, A. ˇSari´ c, and J. Palacci, Unconventional colloidal aggregation in chiral bacterial baths, Nature Physics19, 1680 (2023)

    2023

  63. [63]

    Nishiguchi, S

    D. Nishiguchi, S. Shiratani, K. A. Takeuchi, and I. S. Aranson, Vortex reversal is a precursor of confined bac- terial turbulence, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences122, e2414446122 (2025)

    2025

  64. [64]

    Villalobos-Concha, Z

    C. Villalobos-Concha, Z. Liu, G. Ramos, M. Goral, A. Lindner, T. L´ opez-Le´ on, E. Cl´ ement, R. Soto, and M. L. Cordero, Active bacterial baths in droplets, Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences122, e2426096122 (2025)

    2025

  65. [65]

    K. A. Takeuchi and D. Nishiguchi, Various phases of ac- 7 tive matter emerging from bacteria and their implica- tions, arXiv: 2604.13575 (2026)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  66. [66]

    A. R. Poggioli and D. T. Limmer, Odd mobility of a passive tracer in a chiral active fluid, Physical Review Letters130(2023)

    2023

  67. [67]

    E. Kalz, H. D. Vuijk, I. Abdoli, J.-U. Sommer, H. L¨ owen, and A. Sharma, Collisions enhance self-diffusion in odd- diffusive systems, Physical Review Letters129, 090601 (2022)

    2022

  68. [68]

    Li, W.-j

    J.-R. Li, W.-j. Zhu, J.-J. Li, J.-C. Wu, and B.-Q. Ai, Chirality-induced directional rotation of a symmetric gear in a bath of chiral active particles, New Journal of Physics25, 043031 (2023)

    2023

  69. [69]

    Grober, T

    D. Grober, T. Dhar, D. Saintillan, and J. Palacci, The hydrodynamic torque dipole from rotary bacterial flagella powers symmetric discs, Nature Physics (2026)

    2026

  70. [70]

    Hargus, F

    C. Hargus, F. Ghimenti, J. Tailleur, and F. van Wijland, Odd dynamics of passive objects in a chiral active bath, Physical Review Letters135, 167102 (2025)

    2025

  71. [71]

    Hargus, F

    C. Hargus, F. Ghimenti, J. Tailleur, and F. van Wijland, Passive objects in a chiral active bath: From microscopic to macroscopic, Physical Review E112, 044127 (2025)

    2025

  72. [72]

    Maire and I

    R. Maire and I. Pagonabarraga, Kinetic and hydrody- namic theories of chiral intruder dynamics in nonequilib- rium baths, Companion paper (2026)

    2026

  73. [73]

    E. Eren, M. Fruchart, and V. Vitelli, A collisional model of odd fluids: from boltzmann equation to chiral hydro- dynamics, arXiv:2508.12944 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  74. [74]

    C. B. Caporusso, G. Gonnella, and D. Levis, Phase co- existence and edge currents in the chiral lennard-jones fluid, Physical Review Letters132, 168201 (2024)

    2024

  75. [75]

    Meurs, C

    P. Meurs, C. Van den Broeck, and A. Garcia, Rectifica- tion of thermal fluctuations in ideal gases, Physical Re- view E70(2004)

    2004

  76. [76]

    See the Supplementary Material, which includes details on simulations as well as Ref. 98

  77. [77]

    Plyukhin, On the higher order corrections to the fokker–planck equation, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications351, 198 (2005)

    A. Plyukhin, On the higher order corrections to the fokker–planck equation, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications351, 198 (2005)

    2005

  78. [78]

    Hargus, J

    C. Hargus, J. M. Epstein, and K. K. Mandadapu, Odd diffusivity of chiral random motion, Physical Review Let- ters127, 178001 (2021)

    2021

  79. [79]

    Smallenburg, Efficient event-driven simulations of hard spheres, The European Physical Journal E45, 22 (2022)

    F. Smallenburg, Efficient event-driven simulations of hard spheres, The European Physical Journal E45, 22 (2022)

    2022

  80. [80]

    Brito, R

    R. Brito, R. Soto, and V. Garz´ o, Dynamic properties in a collisional model for confined granular fluids: A review, Entropy28(2026)

    2026

Showing first 80 references.