Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 61 references

Multiconfigurational Mixed Quantum-Classical Approach for Correlated Many-Body Dynamics

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-07-30 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A multiconfigurational mixed quantum-classical method captures multi-exciton spatial correlations that mean-field misses, while a mean-field path shortcut recovers early-time correlations cheaply.

desk verdict Solid beyond-mean-field MQC method for multi-exciton pair correlations; the phonon-coupled decay claims rest on unbenchmarked Ehrenfest averaging, but the core methodological step is real and worth refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.23414 v1 pith:KDEAVRSN submitted 2026-07-26 quant-ph cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.chem-ph

Pritha Ghosh , Rajanya Sarkar , Arkajit Mandal This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phcond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.chem-ph
keywords mixedquantum-classicaldynamicsmulticonfigurationalwavefunctionmulti-excitontransportphonon-induceddisorderspatialpaircorrelationsmean-fieldpathapproximationBose-Hubbard-Holstein
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Simulating many interacting excitons coupled to phonons is hard: full quantum dynamics is intractable, and mean-field treatments lose the spatial correlations that matter for quantum materials. This paper builds a mixed approach in which the excitons are a multiconfigurational wavefunction—a linear combination of bosonic permanents over several time-dependent modes—while the phonons move quasi-classically under forces taken from that correlated density. On a dissipative lattice it shows that phonon disorder and exciton–exciton repulsion together set how transport and pair correlations depend on excitation number. Mean-field (one mode) still gives semi-quantitatively right diffusion, but only multi-mode runs produce the pair-density signatures; precomputing nuclear paths at mean-field and then evolving the multiconfigurational excitons (MFPA) recovers those early-time correlations at much lower cost. The practical claim is a usable route to correlated multi-exciton physics at finite temperature without a full quantum phonon treatment.

What carries the argument

Multiconfigurational many-body Ehrenfest: the excitonic state is expanded in time-dependent permanents built from M single-particle modes (recovering MCTDHB without phonons and multi-trajectory Ehrenfest at N_ex=1), with nuclear forces taken from the multiconfigurational one-body density ρ⁽¹⁾.

What would settle it

On a phonon-coupled multi-exciton chain small enough for a fully quantum or higher-level nuclear treatment, compare multi-mode multiconfigurational pair densities and MSD against that benchmark; a large mismatch would falsify the claim that the quasi-classical multiconfigurational forces and MFPA are reliable.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

A multiconfigurational mixed quantum-classical ansatz—excitons as a sum of permanents over M time-dependent bosonic modes, phonons quasi-classical with forces from the multiconfigurational one-body density—captures phonon-coupled multi-exciton spatial pair correlations that the mean-field (M=1) limit misses, while mean-field still yields semi-quantitatively accurate diffusive transport; the mean-field path approximation reproduces early-time spatial correlations to good accuracy.

Load-bearing premise

That treating the phonons as classical harmonic trajectories driven by the instantaneous multiconfigurational density is accurate enough for the finite-temperature transport and correlation claims on large lattices, even though exact checks exist only for pure excitonic dynamics on small systems.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Mean-field mixed quantum-classical runs remain usable for excitation-dependent diffusion constants when only transport, not correlations, is required.
  • Early-time spatial pair correlations in multi-exciton systems can be computed by reusing precomputed mean-field nuclear paths (MFPA) instead of full multi-mode back-reaction.
  • Increasing the number of modes systematically improves pair-density maps and modestly corrects diffusion when repulsion competes with phonon disorder.
  • The same multiconfigurational mixed framework is positioned to treat correlated exciton-polariton dynamics under phonon disorder.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If MFPA holds more generally, screening multi-exciton or polariton materials for short-time quantum correlations becomes feasible on device-scale lattices without multi-mode nuclear forces on every trajectory.
  • The reported crossover—from diffusion falling with N_ex at weak U to rising with N_ex at strong U—suggests a practical knob (density versus interaction) for tuning whether phonon disorder or repulsion dominates transport.
  • Failure of classical-path and mean-field-force approximations on MSD implies that any polariton extension will still need some form of excited-state nuclear back-reaction for long-time transport.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a multiconfigurational mixed quantum-classical method for finite-temperature multi-exciton dynamics coupled to phonons. The excitonic subsystem is propagated as a linear combination of bosonic permanents over M time-dependent single-particle functions (MCTDHB-like), derived via the Dirac–Frenkel variational principle with gauge fixing, while the phonons evolve quasi-classically under a mean force built from the multiconfigurational one-body density (Eq. 20). The method reduces to multi-trajectory Ehrenfest at Nex=1 and to MCTDHB without phonons. Benchmarks against exact Schrödinger propagation for 3 excitons on 21 sites, with and without static disorder (Figs. 1–2), show systematic convergence in M. On 400-site phonon-coupled systems, the authors report that mean-field (M=1) gives semi-quantitative MSD/diffusion but misses spatial pair correlations, that M>1 captures transient ρ⁽²⁾/g⁽²⁾ cross-peaks that decay on a sub-ps timescale under phonon-induced disorder (Figs. 3–6), and that a mean-field path approximation (MFPA) reproduces the early-time pair correlations at reduced cost even though it fails the MSD.

Significance. If the phonon-coupled results hold, the work is a useful and timely contribution: it provides a systematic, convergent-in-M route to many-body correlations in exciton transport beyond Gross–Pitaevskii/mean-field treatments, with direct relevance to multi-exciton phenomena in organic semiconductors and, prospectively, polaritonic systems. Specific strengths: the EOMs are derived cleanly from the Dirac–Frenkel principle with explicit gauge fixing and a stated regularization of the inverse one-body density matrix; the method has the correct reduction limits (MTE at Nex=1; MCTDHB without phonons); and the excitonic propagator is benchmarked against exact Schrödinger dynamics with demonstrated M-convergence, with and without static disorder (Figs. 1–2). The finding that MFPA reproduces early-time pair correlations from precomputed mean-field trajectories, if quantitatively established, would be a practically valuable cost-saving result. However, the phonon-coupled half of the claims currently rests entirely on internal cross-M comparisons within an unvalidated Ehrenfest nuclear treatment, which caps the present evidentiary weight of Figs. 3–6.

major comments (4)
  1. [§III, Figs. 3–6; Eq. (20)] The physical content of Figs. 4–6 is the ~sub-ps decay of the pair-density cross-peaks, explicitly attributed to 'phonon-induced dynamical disorder and decoherence.' Within multi-trajectory Ehrenfest, however, there is no true decoherence mechanism: ensemble averaging over Wigner-sampled classical nuclear trajectories produces dephasing that is classical disorder dressed as decoherence, and mean-field Ehrenfest is documented to give quantitatively inaccurate coherence-decay times in Holstein/spin-boson-type models. Moreover, the nuclear force in Eq. (20) depends only on the one-body density ρ⁽¹⁾ᵢᵢ, so the nuclear back-reaction is blind to the two-body correlations whose decay is the claimed observable. Every phonon-coupled result (Figs. 3–6) is benchmarked only against other runs of the same framework (M=1 vs 2 vs 3 vs 6, MFPA vs M=3). This is load-bearing for half of the central claim.
  2. [§III, Fig. 5 and Fig. 6; Eq. (29)] The abstract and §IV state that MFPA 'can reproduce the spatial correlations to a good accuracy,' and this is the paper's main practical deliverable. The supporting evidence (Fig. 5(d) window-averaged ρ⁽²⁾, Fig. 5(e)–(l) maps, Fig. 6) is qualitative. Two gaps: (a) no quantitative error metric is given for 'good accuracy' (e.g., relative L2 error of g⁽²⁾ or of the windowed ρ⁽²⁾ trace vs. the M=3/M=6 reference as a function of time), and Fig. 5(d) itself shows visible deviations that are not characterized; (b) no mechanistic explanation is offered for why MFPA — which demonstrably fails the MSD (Fig. 5(a)) — nonetheless succeeds for ρ⁽²⁾, i.e., why early-time pair correlations are insensitive to the nuclear back-reaction error that corrupts transport. Since MFPA is an ad-hoc approximation introduced in this paper, its domain of validity should be established quantitatively (at minimum, the
  3. [§III, Figs. 3–6] Fig. 3 (MSD and diffusion coefficients on 400 sites) and Figs. 4–5 use M=3 as the de facto reference, and Fig. 6 uses M=6, but convergence in M for the phonon-coupled observables is asserted only by cross-M comparison within Ehrenfest: no M-dependence beyond M=3 is shown for the MSD/diffusion coefficients, and M=6 is shown only for g⁽²⁾ at two times. For Nex=15–20 with U=0.01 a.u., the statement (Fig. 4 caption text) that 'M=2 produces reasonably converged results' is not demonstrated for the transport observables. Please show M=4 (or M=6) MSD and diffusion-coefficient curves for at least the largest Nex, or state clearly which observables are converged at which M. Relatedly, the number of nuclear trajectories used in the phonon-coupled simulations is not stated anywhere I can find, and no statistical error bars appear on the MSD, D(Nex) curves, or Fig. 5(d); these are essential for judg
  4. [§II, Eqs. (9) and (25)] The normalization of the initial Gaussian SPF, ϕ₀ᵢ(0) = (1/√N)exp[−(i−i_mid)²/2σ²], writes the total excitation population implicitly; it should be stated explicitly how Nex excitations are distributed (i.e., that the permanent coefficient carries all Nex in mode 0) and how ρ⁽¹⁾ᵢᵢ(0) relates to Nex|ϕ₀ᵢ|². Also, in Eq. (9) the symbol Ĥ is redefined as Ĥ − Ĥ_p ('refers to the matrix element of the many-body Hamiltonian Ĥ = Ĥ − Ĥ_p'), overloading the Hamiltonian symbol defined in Eq. (1); a distinct symbol would avoid confusion, particularly because the coupling term Ĥ_e−p must still contribute through the classical Ri(t) in h_ij.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§I] Typo: 'forin silicoinvestigation' — missing spaces around 'in silico.'
  2. [Fig. 3 caption] Hopping parameter τ is quoted in a.u. in Figs. 1–2 but in cm⁻¹ (300 cm⁻¹) in Fig. 3; please use consistent units or give the conversion. Similarly 'σ = 50 units' should read '50 lattice sites' with the lattice constant a defined (used later in MSD units of a²).
  3. [Fig. 5(d)] The averaging window in Fig. 5(d) (half-width 5, centered at (0,−10)) appears arbitrary; please motivate the choice (e.g., centered on the dominant cross-peak) and show that conclusions are insensitive to window placement.
  4. [§III] Fig. 4 uses Nex=10 while Fig. 5 uses Nex=15 and Fig. 3 varies Nex; a short table summarizing parameters (N, Nex, M, U, number of trajectories/realizations) per figure would greatly aid readability and reproducibility.
  5. [§I] The clarification that the method is unrelated to Shalashilin's 'Multiconfigurational Ehrenfest' [52] is helpful; consider also citing ML-MCTDH-based exciton-phonon dynamics work as alternative fully quantum benchmarks to motivate the requested validation.
  6. [§II, Eq. (12)] Eq. (12): the projector P is defined on |ϕk⟩ while the sum runs over eigenstates |ϕ̃k⟩; please make the notation consistent.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: variational multiconfigurational-Ehrenfest derivation is self-contained; benchmarks and MFPA comparisons are internal consistency checks, not predictions forced by fit or self-citation.

full rationale

The paper derives SPF and coefficient EOMs from the Dirac–Frenkel variational principle on a permanent expansion (Eqs. 5–9), with nuclear forces from the multiconfigurational one-body density (Eq. 20). That chain does not define the claimed observables (MSD, D, ρ⁽²⁾, g⁽²⁾) in terms of themselves. Model parameters (τ, U, γ, ω₀, T, Wigner sampling) are stated inputs, not inverted from the transport or pair-density results. Convergence is checked against exact pure-excitonic Schrödinger dynamics on small lattices (Figs. 1–2) and by increasing M; phonon-coupled Figs. 3–6 compare M and MFPA only within the same framework—an internal method comparison, not a fitted quantity renamed as a prediction. The self-citation to the authors’ prior mean-field MQC work [27] is used as background (limitation of M=1), not as a uniqueness theorem or load-bearing premise that forces the new correlation claims. Structural fact that M=1 factorizes ρ⁽²⁾ is acknowledged as expected, not smuggled in as a novel derivation. No circular step meets the quote-and-reduce standard.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claims rest on a standard Bose-Hubbard-Holstein model, Dirac–Frenkel variation for a permanent expansion, and the Ehrenfest closure for nuclei. Free parameters are model and numerical knobs (U, γ, M, ε, etc.), not fits that define the observables. The main invented construct is the named multiconfigurational MQC/MFPA workflow itself; no new physical particle or force is postulated.

free parameters (6)
  • On-site interaction U = 0.001, 0.005, 0.01 a.u. (and 0.006 in small benchmarks)
    Scanned by hand (0.001–0.01 a.u.) to illustrate interaction vs disorder trends; not derived from a specific material Hamiltonian.
  • Exciton-phonon coupling γ = 1.24e-5 a.u.
    Chosen as typical of crystalline organic semiconductors; sets dynamic-disorder strength.
  • Phonon frequency ω0 = 5 meV
    Model Holstein frequency fixed by authors.
  • Hopping τ = 0.004 a.u. (small); 300 cm^-1 (large)
    Nearest-neighbor electronic coupling set differently in small vs large simulations.
  • Mode count M and occupation threshold ε = M up to 10 (small), 3–6 (large); ε small numerical threshold
    Truncation and regularization of the multiconfigurational manifold; convergence claimed empirically.
  • Initial Gaussian width σ and temperature T = σ=50 sites; T=150 K
    Initial-state and thermal sampling choices that condition MSD and correlation decay.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Dirac–Frenkel variational principle on the multiconfigurational permanent ansatz yields the SPF and coefficient EOMs (Eqs. 8–9).
    Standard MCTDHB-style derivation; invoked in Theory section.
  • domain assumption Nuclear degrees of freedom may be replaced by classical trajectories with forces from the instantaneous multiconfigurational excitonic density (Ehrenfest/MTE closure).
    Load-bearing mixed quantum-classical assumption; no quantum-phonon benchmark on the large systems.
  • domain assumption The system is described by a 1D Bose-Hubbard-Holstein Hamiltonian with on-site U and local Holstein coupling only.
    Model choice in Sec. II; excludes nonlocal phonons, disorder beyond on-site, and higher bands.
  • domain assumption Initial nuclear (R,P) may be sampled from Wigner (≈ classical Boltzmann for T>100 K) distributions on undisplaced oscillators.
    Stated for the 150 K runs; underpins finite-T dynamic disorder.
  • domain assumption Total excitation number Nex is conserved and dynamics stay in a fixed bosonic excitation subspace.
    Built into the permanent basis size; excludes recombination/annihilation channels except via effective U.
  • ad hoc to paper MFPA: replacing multiconfigurational back-reaction by precomputed M=1 paths is a controlled approximation for early-time spatial correlations.
    Introduced and tested in Fig. 5–6; empirically useful for g⁽²⁾ but not for MSD.
invented entities (2)
  • Multiconfigurational many-body Ehrenfest approach (permanents + quasi-classical phonons)
    purpose: Propagate correlated multi-exciton dynamics with phonon static/dynamic disorder beyond mean-field.
    Named methodological construct of the paper; reduces to known MCTDHB or MTE in limits.
  • Mean-field path approximation (MFPA)
    purpose: Cheap recovery of early-time spatial pair correlations using precomputed M=1 nuclear trajectories.
    Defined and validated only within this paper's numerics; no external falsifiable handle.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Multiconfigurational Mixed Quantum-Classical Approach for Correlated Many-Body Dynamics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KDEAVRSN

@misc{pith2026260723414,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Multiconfigurational Mixed Quantum-Classical Approach for Correlated Many-Body Dynamics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KDEAVRSN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.23414}
}
read the original abstract

In this work, we introduce a multiconfigurational mixed quantum-classical many-body approach for simulating the finite-temperature correlated multi-exciton dynamics in the presence of phonon-induced static and dynamic disorder. In this mixed quantum-classical approach, the excitonic subsystem is described using a multiconfigurational wavefunction that extends beyond the mean-field limit, while the phonons are evolved quasi-classically. Using this approach, we simulate a multi-excitonic dissipative system and show how the interplay between phonon-induced dynamic disorder and exciton-exciton many-body interactions determines excitation-dependent excitonic transport and spatial correlations. Our results show that while the mean-field approach produces semi-quantitatively accurate diffusive dynamics, it does not capture the spatial correlations as expected. We find that a mean-field path approximation, where we generate pre-computed trajectories using our mean-field mixed quantum-classical approach and then perform multiconfigurational dynamics, can reproduce the spatial correlations to a good accuracy, positioning this approach as an efficient method for capturing spatial correlations in complex systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.23414 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) shows the spreading out of the excitonic den￾sity over a net timespan of 0.02 ps when considering a single mode (M = 1). Systematically increasing M from 1 to 3 and then to 6 ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    O. P. Dimitriev, Dynamics of excitons in conjugated molecules and organic semiconductor systems, Chemical Reviews122, 8487 (2022)

    2022

  2. [2]

    G. S. Engel, T. R. Calhoun, E. L. Read, T.-K. Ahn, T. Mancal, Y.-C. Cheng, R. E. Blankenship, and G. R. Fleming, Evidence for wavelike energy transfer through quantum coherence in photosynthetic systems, Nature 446, 782 (2007)

    2007

  3. [3]

    G. M. Akselrod, P. B. Deotare, N. J. Thompson, J.-H. Lee, W. A. Tisdale, and V. Bulovi´ c, Visualization of exci- ton transport in ordered and disordered molecular solids, Nature Communications5, 3646 (2014)

    2014

  4. [4]

    S. Deng, E. Shi, L. Yuan, L. Jin, L. Dou, and L. Huang, Long-range exciton transport and slow annihilation in two-dimensional hybrid perovskites, Nature Communi- cations11, 664 (2020)

    2020

  5. [5]

    X.-H. Jin, M. B. Price, J. R. Finnegan, C. E. Boott, J. M. Richter, A. Rao, S. M. Menke, R. H. Friend, G. R. Whit- tell, and I. Manners, Long-range exciton transport in con- jugated polymer nanofibers prepared by seeded growth, Science360, 897 (2018)

    2018

  6. [6]

    Najafov, B

    H. Najafov, B. Lee, Q. Zhou, L. C. Feldman, and V. Pod- zorov, Observation of long-range exciton diffusion in highly ordered organic semiconductors, Nature Materi- als9, 938 (2010)

    2010

  7. [7]

    C. Zhu, T. Nguyen, S. C. Boehme, A. Moskalenko, D. N. Dirin, M. I. Bodnarchuk, C. Katan, J. Even, G. Rain` o, and M. V. Kovalenko, Many-body correlations and exci- ton complexes in cspbbr 3 quantum dots, Advanced Ma- terials35, 2208354 (2023)

    2023

  8. [8]

    Balasubrahmaniyam, A

    M. Balasubrahmaniyam, A. Simkhovich, A. Golombek, G. Ankonina, Y. Tsurimaki, O. Bar-Elli, Y. Preezant, E. I. Rosenthal, R. Rapaport, Y. Roichman, and E. Lustig, From enhanced diffusion to ultrafast ballistic motion of hybrid light–matter excitations, Nature Mate- rials22, 338 (2023)

    2023

Show all 61 references
  1. [9]

    Khazanov, S

    T. Khazanov, S. Gunasekaran, A. George, R. Lomlu, S. Mukherjee, and A. J. Musser, Embrace the dark- ness: An experimental perspective on organic exciton– polaritons, Chemical Physics Reviews4, 041305 (2023)

    2023

  2. [10]

    Krupp, G

    N. Krupp, G. Groenhof, and O. Vendrell, Quantum dy- namics simulation of exciton–polariton transport, Nature Communications16, 5431 (2025)

    2025

  3. [11]

    Y. Guo, G. Han, J. Guo, H. Guo, Y. Fu, X. Miao, Z. Wang, D. Li, S. Li, X. Xu, X. Lu, H. Chen, Y. Yi, and P. C. Y. Chow, Engineering ultrafast exciton dynam- ics to boost organic photovoltaic performance, Energy & Environmental Science17, 8776 (2024)

    2024

  4. [12]

    M. B. Price, P. A. Hume, A. Ilina, M. Wagner, A. Ruseckas, I. D. W. Samuel, R. H. Friend, and A. Rao, Free charge photogeneration in a single component high photovoltaic efficiency organic semiconductor, Nature Communications13, 2827 (2022)

    2022

  5. [13]

    J.-D. Baek, S. J. Yang, H. Yang, W. Shao, Y.-T. Yang, and L. Dou, Exciton dynamics in layered halide per- ovskite light-emitting diodes, Advanced Materials37, 2411998 (2025)

    2025

  6. [14]

    N. C. Giebink, B. W. D’Andrade, M. S. Weaver, P. B. Mackenzie, J. J. Brown, M. E. Thompson, and S. R. For- rest, Intrinsic luminance loss in phosphorescent small- molecule organic light-emitting devices due to bimolec- ular annihilation reactions, Journal of Applied Physics 10...

    2008

  7. [15]

    Grosso, J

    G. Grosso, J. C. Graves, A. T. Hammack, A. A. High, L. V. Butov, M. Hanson, and A. C. Gossard, Excitonic switches operating at around 100 k, Nature Photonics3, 577 (2009)

    2009

  8. [16]

    S. W. Lee, J. S. Lee, W. H. Choi, D. Choi, and S.-H. Gong, Ultra-compact exciton polariton modulator based on van der waals semiconductors, Nature communica- tions15, 2331 (2024)

    2024

  9. [17]

    F. Xuan, M. Lai, Y. Wu, and S. Y. Quek, Exciton- enhanced spontaneous parametric down-conversion in two-dimensional crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 246902 (2024)

    2024

  10. [18]

    Sohoni, I

    S. Sohoni, I. Ghosh, G. T. Nash, J. Feng, K. Badu, X. Ma, and C. J. Bardeen, Optically accessible long-lived electronic biexcitons at room temperature in strongly coupled h-aggregates, Nature Communications15, 8280 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    Kumar, I

    S. Kumar, I. S. Dunn, S. Deng, H. Choi, K. Badu, L. Dou, and C. J. Bardeen, Exciton annihilation in molecular ag- gregates suppressed through quantum interference, Na- ture Chemistry15, 1118 (2023)

    2023

  12. [20]

    L. V. Butov, A. C. Gossard, and D. S. Chemla, Macro- scopically ordered state in an exciton system, Nature 418, 751 (2002)

    2002

  13. [21]

    A. A. High, J. R. Leonard, A. T. Hammack, M. M. Fogler, L. V. Butov, A. V. Kavokin, K. L. Campman, and A. C. Gossard, Spontaneous coherence in a cold exciton gas, Nature483, 584 (2012)

    2012

  14. [22]

    Z. Wang, D. A. Rhodes, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. C. Hone, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Evidence of high- temperature exciton condensation in two-dimensional atomic double layers, Nature574, 76 (2019)

    2019

  15. [23]

    Huang and T

    L. Huang and T. D. Krauss, Quantized bimolecular auger recombination of excitons in single-walled carbon nan- otubes, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 057407 (2006)

    2006

  16. [24]

    T. C. Berkelbach, M. S. Hybertsen, and D. R. Reichman, Microscopic theory of singlet exciton fission. ii. applica- tion to pentacene dimers and the role of superexchange, The Journal of Chemical Physics138, 114103 (2013). 12

    2013

  17. [25]

    Tempelaar and D

    R. Tempelaar and D. R. Reichman, Vibronic exciton the- ory of singlet fission. iii. how vibronic coupling and ther- modynamics promote rapid triplet generation in pen- tacene crystals, The Journal of Chemical Physics148, 102309 (2018)

    2018

  18. [26]

    Amini, J

    A. Amini, J. Cerda, L. Mej ´ ıa, and A. Mandal, Many- body second order green’s function theory for ab ini- tio molecular quantum electrodynamics, arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.26076 (2026)

    2026 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Ghosh, A

    P. Ghosh, A. Manjalingal, S. Wickramasinghe, S. R. Koshkaki, and A. Mandal, Mean-field mixed quantum- classical approach for many-body quantum dynamics of exciton polaritons, Physical Review B112, 104319 (2025)

    2025

  20. [28]

    T. E. Li, H.-T. Chen, and J. E. Subotnik, Comparison of different classical, semiclassical, and quantum treatments of light–matter interactions: Understanding energy con- servation, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 15, 1957 (2019)

    1957

  21. [29]

    Crespo-Otero and M

    R. Crespo-Otero and M. Barbatti, Recent advances and perspectives on nonadiabatic mixed quantum–classical dynamics, Chemical Reviews118, 7026 (2018)

    2018

  22. [30]

    J. C. Tully, Molecular dynamics with electronic transi- tions, The Journal of Chemical Physics93, 1061 (1990)

    1990

  23. [31]

    J. E. Subotnik, A. Jain, B. Landry, A. Petit, W. Ouyang, and N. Bellonzi, Understanding the surface hopping view of electronic transitions and decoherence, Annual Review of Physical Chemistry67, 387 (2016)

    2016

  24. [32]

    T. E. Li, A. Nitzan, S. Hammes-Schiffer, and J. E. Subot- nik, Quantum simulations of vibrational strong coupling via path integrals, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters13, 3890 (2022)

    2022

  25. [33]

    Mandal, M

    A. Mandal, M. A. Taylor, B. M. Weight, E. R. Koessler, X. Li, and P. Huo, Theoretical advances in polariton chemistry and molecular cavity quantum electrodynam- ics, Chemical Reviews123, 9786 (2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    J. Liu, S. V. Kilina, S. Tretiak, and O. V. Prezhdo, Lig- ands slow down pure-dephasing in semiconductor quan- tum dots, ACS nano9, 9106 (2015)

    2015

  27. [35]

    L. Wang, D. Beljonne, L. Chen, and Q. Shi, Mixed quantum-classical simulations of charge transport in organic materials: Numerical benchmark of the su- schrieffer-heeger model, The Journal of chemical physics 134(2011)

    2011

  28. [36]

    A. J. Sneyd, D. Beljonne, and A. Rao, A new frontier in exciton transport: transient delocalization, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters13, 6820 (2022)

    2022

  29. [37]

    Stippell, C

    E. Stippell, C. Mora Perez, N. Favate, L. Huang, C. W. Li, and O. V. Prezhdo, Computational screening of lig- ands for enhanced interactions between lead halide per- ovskite quantum dots, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters16, 5666 (2025)

    2025

  30. [38]

    Einsele and R

    R. Einsele and R. Mitric, Nonadiabatic exciton dynamics and energy gradients in the framework of fmo-lc-tddftb, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation20, 6587 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    Troisi and G

    A. Troisi and G. Orlandi, Charge-transport regime of crystalline organic semiconductors: Diffusion limited by thermal off-diagonal electronic disorder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 086601 (2006)

    2006

  32. [40]

    O. V. Prezhdo, Modeling non-adiabatic dynamics in nanoscale and condensed matter systems, Accounts of Chemical Research54, 4239 (2021), pMID: 34756013, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.1c00525

    2021 doi

  33. [41]

    A. V. Akimov and O. V. Prezhdo, Nonadiabatic dy- namics of charge transfer and singlet fission at the pen- tacene/c60 interface, Journal of the American Chemical Society136, 1599 (2014)

    2014

  34. [42]

    Morita, K

    Y. Morita, K. Yoshioka, and M. Kuwata-Gonokami, Ob- servation of bose-einstein condensates of excitons in a bulk semiconductor, Nature Communications13, 5388 (2022)

    2022

  35. [43]

    A. D. Alliluev, D. V. Makarov, N. A. Asriyan, A. A. Elistratov, and Y. E. Lozovik, Non-markovian stochastic gross–pitaevskii equation for the exciton–polariton bose– einstein condensate, Journal of Low Temperature Physics 214, 331 (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    Carusotto and C

    I. Carusotto and C. Ciuti, Quantum fluids of light, Rev. Mod. Phys.85, 299 (2013)

    2013

  37. [45]

    Nespolo and I

    J. Nespolo and I. Carusotto, Generalized gross-pitaevskii model for intersubband polariton lasing, Physical Review B100, 035305 (2019)

    2019

  38. [46]

    J. C. Tully, Mixed quantum–classical dynamics, Faraday Discussions110, 407 (1998)

    1998

  39. [47]

    S. R. Koshkaki, A. Manjalingal, L. Blackham, and A. Mandal, Exciton-polariton dynamics in multilayered materials, Nature Communications17, 1 (2026)

    2026

  40. [48]

    Blackham, A

    L. Blackham, A. Manjalingal, S. R. Koshkaki, and A. Mandal, Microscopic theory of polaron-polariton dis- persion and propagation, Nano Letters25, 15874 (2025)

    2025

  41. [49]

    O. E. Alon, A. I. Streltsov, and L. S. Cederbaum, Multiconfigurational time-dependent hartree method for bosons: Many-body dynamics of bosonic systems, Phys- ical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics 77, 033613 (2008)

    2008

  42. [50]

    A. I. Streltsov, O. E. Alon, and L. S. Cederbaum, Role of excited states in the splitting of a trapped interacting bose–einstein condensate by a time-dependent barrier, Physical Review Letters99, 030402 (2007)

    2007

  43. [51]

    Meyer, F

    H.-D. Meyer, F. Gatti, and G. A. Worth, Multidimen- sional quantum dynamics: Mctdh theory and applica- tions, Wiley-VCH (2009)

    2009

  44. [52]

    D. V. Shalashilin, Multiconfigurational ehrenfest ap- proach to quantum coherent dynamics in large molecular systems, Faraday Discussions153, 105 (2011)

    2011

  45. [53]

    Sakmann,Many-body Schr¨ odinger dynamics of Bose- Einstein condensates(Springer Science & Business Me- dia, 2011)

    K. Sakmann,Many-body Schr¨ odinger dynamics of Bose- Einstein condensates(Springer Science & Business Me- dia, 2011)

    2011

  46. [54]

    Giannini, W.-T

    S. Giannini, W.-T. Peng, L. Cupellini, S. Jurinovich, B. Mennucci, and D. Beljonne, Exciton transport in molecular organic semiconductors boosted by transient quantum delocalization, Nature Communications13, 2755 (2022)

    2022

  47. [55]

    Cheneau, P

    M. Cheneau, P. Barmettler, D. Poletti, M. Endres, P. Schauß, T. Fukuhara, C. Gross, I. Bloch, C. Kollath, and S. Kuhr, Light-cone-like spreading of correlations in a quantum many-body system, Nature481, 484 (2012)

    2012

  48. [56]

    Sakmann, A

    K. Sakmann, A. I. Streltsov, O. E. Alon, and L. S. Cederbaum, Reduced density matrices and coherence of trapped interacting bosons, Physical Review A78, 023615 (2008)

    2008

  49. [57]

    S. Bera, B. Chakrabarti, A. Gammal, M. C. Tsat- sos, M. L. Lekala, B. Chatterjee, C. L´ evˆ eque, and A. U. J. Lode, Sorting fermionization from crystalliza- tion in many-boson wavefunctions, Scientific Reports9, 17873 (2019)

    2019

  50. [58]

    Mandal, A

    B. Mandal, A. Semenov, and D. Babikov, Adiabatic tra- jectory approximation within the framework of mixed 13 quantum/classical theory, Journal of Physical Chemistry A124, 9877 (2020)

    2020

  51. [59]

    R. S. Mattos, S. Mukherjee, and M. Barbatti, Quantum dynamics from classical trajectories, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation20, 7728 (2024)

    2024

  52. [60]

    B. X. Chng, M. E. Mondal, W. Ying, and P. Huo, Quan- tum dynamics simulations of exciton polariton transport, Nano Letters (2025)

    2025

  53. [61]

    A. V. Akimov and O. V. Prezhdo, The pyxaid program for non-adiabatic molecular dynamics in condensed mat- ter systems, Journal of chemical theory and computation 9, 4959 (2013)

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed July 30, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.