Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 8 minor 87 references

Generalized entropy for black-hole islands equals a Wald-like Noether charge of dilaton gravity plus the Polyakov-Liouville action, yielding unitary Page curves without the replica trick.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-31 20:40 UTC pith:ZBREYPQD

load-bearing objection Clean Lorentzian check for eternal DREH islands; the evaporating half is under-solved and only partly matches the Euclidean benchmark it leans on. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.24883 v1 pith:ZBREYPQD submitted 2026-07-27 hep-th gr-qc

Wald-like entropy and Islands in Dimensionally Reduced Einstein-Hilbert Gravity

Krishna Jalan This is my paper
classification hep-th gr-qc
keywords island formulaPage curveWald entropydilaton gravityPolyakov-Liouvillequantum extremal surfaceHawking radiationdimensional reduction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper shows that the fine-grained entropy of Hawking radiation, including the island contribution that restores unitarity, can be read off in Lorentzian signature as the Wald-like Noether charge of a simple two-dimensional model. The model is the s-wave reduction of four-dimensional Einstein-Hilbert gravity coupled to a large-c conformal field theory whose quantum stress tensor is captured by the Polyakov-Liouville action. Extremizing that charge locates the quantum extremal surface, fixes the Page time, and produces the Page curve for both the eternal Hartle-Hawking black hole and a quasi-stationary evaporating black hole. The calculation never invokes the Euclidean replica trick or a non-gravitating bath; the radiation lives in the black-hole spacetime itself. A sympathetic reader cares because the same unitary entropy that previously required replica wormholes now emerges from an ordinary Noether charge once the conformal anomaly is kept in the action.

Core claim

In the dimensionally reduced Einstein-Hilbert plus Polyakov-Liouville theory the island-formula generalized entropy is identical to the Wald-like Noether charge S_gen = [F(φ)/(4G_N) - (c/6)ψ] evaluated at the candidate surface X. Extremizing this expression recovers the quantum extremal surface, the Page time and the unitary Page curve for both the eternal and the quasi-stationary evaporating black hole, matching earlier Euclidean island-rule results.

What carries the argument

The Wald-like entropy prescription: the Noether potential of the combined dilaton-gravity plus Polyakov-Liouville Lagrangian, evaluated on a codimension-2 surface with the auxiliary null vector set to vanish and its exterior derivative set to the binormal, yields S_gen directly.

Load-bearing premise

The dilaton is kept strictly classical while only the metric receives linearized one-loop back-reaction, and matter-dilaton couplings that would appear in a genuine four-dimensional reduction are omitted.

What would settle it

Recompute the quantum extremal surface after including the non-minimal dilaton-matter couplings of a true s-wave reduction (or the next order in the back-reaction parameter) and check whether the island still sits at the reported distance from the horizon and whether the Page time remains unchanged.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Unitary Page curves for s-wave black holes can be obtained from a purely Lorentzian Noether charge without Euclidean replicas or exterior baths.
  • For the eternal black hole the island lies outside the back-reacted horizon at order (c G_N)^2; for the evaporating black hole a family of islands sits at order c G_N from the event horizon.
  • The same Noether-charge construction supplies a concrete route to include vacuum-polarization corrections once the four-dimensional effective action is written with auxiliary fields.
  • The late-time radiation entropy in the Unruh state decreases linearly once the island is included, realizing the falling half of the Page curve.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the identification of generalized entropy with Noether charge holds for any diffeomorphism-invariant theory, the same Lorentzian shortcut should apply to higher-curvature or non-minimally coupled four-dimensional models without new replica calculations.
  • The appearance of a continuous family of near-horizon quantum extremal surfaces in the evaporating case suggests that the Page curve may be realized by a continuum of saddles rather than a single causal trajectory.
  • Extending the construction order-by-order in the curvature expansion of the four-dimensional effective action would give a controlled way to test how vacuum polarization shifts the Page time relative to the pure-anomaly result.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 8 minor

Summary. The paper applies the Wald-like (Noether-charge) prescription for the generalized entropy in the island formula — previously developed for JT and RST models by Pedraza et al. and Hirano — to the dimensionally reduced Einstein-Hilbert (DREH) model: 4D Einstein gravity reduced to a 2D dilaton theory, supplemented by a large-c Polyakov-Liouville (PL) action encoding one-loop backreaction of the Hawking radiation. Working in the Hartle-Hawking (eternal) and Unruh (quasi-stationary evaporating) vacua, the author derives S_gen = [F(ϕ)/(4G_N) − (c/6)ψ]_X as the Noether charge of the combined DREH+PL action, extremizes it to locate quantum extremal surfaces, and extracts Page times and Page curves. For the eternal black hole the QES sits at O((cG_N)²) outside the backreacted horizon and the Page curve agrees with the Euclidean replica result of Đorđević et al. [1]. For the evaporating black hole the QES is found at O(cG_N) from the event horizon, but the extremization is not fully solved: a va − vc = const ansatz is assumed to obtain the late-time island entropy, the QES forms a family rather than a unique trajectory, and the result is acknowledged to differ qualitatively from the replica computation of [2]. No replica trick is used; the setup requires no non-gravitating bath.

Significance. If the evaporating-sector gaps are closed, this is a useful contribution to the islands program: it is the first application of the Lorentzian Wald-like generalized-entropy prescription to the s-wave sector of 4D Einstein-Hilbert gravity, it works in a fully gravitational setting with no auxiliary bath, and it makes concrete, checkable contact with independent Euclidean replica results. The eternal-sector agreement with [1] and the explicit finite Page times (4.14) and (5.15) are falsifiable outputs of the prescription, and the careful backreaction analysis of Appendix A is of standalone value. The significance is heightened by the paper's honesty about its own approximations; it is correspondingly limited by the fact that the corroboration of the prescription in the evaporating case — the physically central case — is at present incomplete and partly in tension with the one available replica computation [2].

major comments (4)
  1. [§5.1, Eqs. (5.5)-(5.11)] The extremization system (5.5)-(5.6) is two equations for the two unknowns (Ua, va) given (Uc, vc), yet it is never solved: (5.7) expresses Ua in terms of a still-undetermined va, and the late-time island entropy (5.11) — hence the Page time (5.15) — is extracted only after the explicit assumption ("we assume") that va − vc = x is vc-independent. This ansatz is load-bearing: the coefficient −c/24 of κ0vc in (5.11) follows from inserting (5.8) with constant x into the area term. In comparable JT analyses the QES lags the cutoff surface by a time of order the scrambling time, so a constant shift is plausible, but it should be derived or at least checked for self-consistency against the full extremization (e.g., by retaining the O(ε) terms dropped in the approximations r_AH ≃ r0, κa ≃ κ0, which are presumably what restores determinacy, or by a numerical solution of (5.5)-(5.6)). Without thi
  2. [§5.1 and §6, comparison with [2]] The resulting QES (5.8) is a family rather than a unique causal trajectory, and §5.1 and §6 state that this behaviour is "different from what was reported for the Page curve for evaporating black hole in [2]." This matters beyond a comparison of details: the Wald-like prescription (2.2)-(2.3) is not derived from first principles (and the no-island branch (2.12) is inserted by hand, as the manuscript itself states), so its evidence is precisely the agreement with replica-trick computations. In the eternal sector that agreement with [1] is demonstrated; in the evaporating sector the manuscript both (a) fails to determine a unique QES and (b) reports qualitative disagreement with the Euclidean island result of [2], without diagnosing the origin (quasi-stationary approximation? degeneracy of the linearized extremization? genuinely different saddle?). A quantitative reconciliation with [2], o
  3. [§5.1, Eq. (5.8)] With the ansatz va − vc = x, the sign of x is physically fixed (the QES should be in the causal past/interior of the cutoff point), and for κ0x > 0 Eq. (5.8) places the QES strictly inside the event horizon at O(cGN), while for −4 < κ0x < 0 it lies outside. The text discusses both regimes but does not commit to which is realized for the physical cutoff geometry, nor does it comment on whether a QES behind the event horizon is consistent with the quasi-stationary adiabatic picture or with the CGL/negativity constraints usually imposed on island candidates. Since the value of x enters the slope of (5.11), the allowed range of x should be determined and the internal consistency of the chosen branch checked.
  4. [§3, after Eq. (3.14); §6] The modeling choice to keep the dilaton purely classical while backreacting only the metric at linear order in ε (stated after (3.14)) omits matter-dilaton couplings of the form (6.1) that arise in a genuine 4D reduction [41,51,62]. This is a correctness-risk concern specifically because the headline evaporating result — the QES offset in (5.8) — is itself O(cGN): dilaton-anomaly mixing corrections to m(r,v) and h(r,v) enter at the same order and could shift both the horizon locations (3.25) and the QES offset at the order claimed. The non-minimal model of [62] has an independent island analysis available; a brief order-of-magnitude estimate or explicit comparison would substantially strengthen confidence that the reported O(cGN) island locations survive in the more complete s-wave model.
minor comments (8)
  1. [Eq. (5.9) vs Eq. (5.4)] The conformalon term appears as (εc/6)h(a) in (5.4) but as εh(a) in (5.9); please check the prefactor.
  2. [Eq. (5.13)] Typo: "ρ(Uc, vv)" should presumably read ρ(Uc, vc).
  3. [Eqs. (A.55)-(A.56)] The labels of the homogeneous conformalon pieces appear swapped relative to (3.26)-(3.27) and (A.53): tv is written with ψ2(v) and tu with ψ1(u), whereas ψ1 = ψ1(v) and ψ2 = ψ2(u) elsewhere.
  4. [§5.1, footnote 7] Footnote 7 notes that κa need not equal κc, yet below (5.8) one sets κa ≃ κ0; the logic chain of which surface gravity is used at each step would benefit from one clarifying sentence.
  5. [Eqs. (5.5)-(5.6)] The equations mix the dimensionless e^{κa va} with the dimensionful Kruskal coordinate Ua; please state the implicit rescalings/units used so that (5.5) is dimensionally transparent.
  6. [Eq. (3.28) vs (3.29)] The η^{-4} regulator is present in (3.29) but absent in (3.28); a remark on when the regulator must be restored would help the reader.
  7. [First sentence of Appendix A] Typo: "we discuss the to the quantum-corrected black hole solutions" — please fix; also in the abstract, "coincide with Wald-like Noether charge" → "coincide with the Wald-like Noether charge".
  8. [§2.1, Eq. (2.12)] The use of the image point (boundary C′ on the left exterior, or the point obtained by reflecting the incoming ray at r = 0) is essential to (4.11) and (5.13); consider forward-referencing Figures 4 and 7 already at (2.12), where the image-point prescription is first mentioned in footnote 3.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged

Mild acknowledged self-reference in the Wald-like ξ↔S_gen definition (inherited from Pedraza/Hirano); no fitted-as-prediction loop and no load-bearing self-citation.

specific steps
  1. self definitional [§2, prescription (2.2)–(2.3) and comment 3]
    "It might seem that the definition of S_gen is somewhat circular as we used S_gen (in ξ) to define itself. However, to begin with, the prescription does not require the explicit expression for S_gen. The eventual existence of the extremal surface coming from an extremization of S_gen as defined above is well-defined and self-consistent."

    ξ is defined proportionally to the binormal gradient of S_gen, while S_gen is defined as the Noether charge of that same ξ. The object being extremized is therefore partly defined in terms of its own extremal data. The paper treats this as harmless self-consistency once a QES exists, but the definitional loop is explicit and load-bearing for the claimed Lorentzian S_gen.

  2. other [§2.1 after (2.11), eqs. (2.12)]
    "It should be emphasized that the above formula for S_gen to determine the island applies to the case when X is non-empty. The no-island extremum has no first-principle “derivation” from the Wald-like entropy... However, when X=∅, the time-dependent radiation entropy is actually captured by the conformalon contribution S_vN(R)=−(c/6)ψ|_∂R"

    The island branch is obtained from the Noether charge; the no-island branch that supplies the rising half of the Page curve is not. It is inserted by hand (or by appeal to prior JT/RST applications) so that min{S_island, S_no-island} can reproduce a Page curve. This is not a fit-to-data loop, but it means half of the claimed Page-curve output is not derived from the Wald-like construction the paper advertises.

full rationale

The paper’s central move is to apply an existing Lorentzian prescription (Pedraza et al., Hirano) that defines S_gen as the Noether–Wald charge of the total DREH+PL action evaluated on a surface X with a vector ξ built from ∇S_gen. Section 2 comment 3 explicitly flags that this looks circular and defends it only by eventual self-consistency of an extremal surface. That is a real but mild, inherited structural circularity, not unique to this work. The no-island branch is likewise admitted to lack a first-principles Wald derivation and is inserted by the conformalon formula (2.12). Neither step is a data-fit renamed as prediction, nor does the argument rest on a uniqueness theorem or ansatz smuggled from the present author’s prior papers (citations [1,2] are independent Euclidean replica computations by Djordjević et al.; [31,32] are external). Once the prescription is adopted, the QES locations, Page times, and Page curves for the eternal Hartle–Hawking solution are computed from the backreacted metric and conformalon and cross-checked against [1]. The evaporating-sector late-time entropy uses an auxiliary assumption va−vc=const, which is an uncontrolled ansatz rather than circular reduction of output to input. Overall the derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks once the inherited prescription is granted; score 2.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard diffeomorphism-invariant Noether-charge formalism, the island formula as an external input, the validity of s-wave dimensional reduction plus large-c Polyakov-Liouville backreaction, and the Pedraza/Hirano prescription that identifies S_gen with a Wald-like charge evaluated at a non-Killing extremal surface. No new particles or forces are introduced. Free parameters are regulators and the semi-classical expansion parameter, not fitted to force unitarity.

free parameters (4)
  • ε = 2c G_N / 3 = ≪ (λ r_0)^2, otherwise free within semi-classical regime
    Semi-classical backreaction expansion parameter; required ≪ (λ r_0)^2. Controls all quantum corrections to the metric and the size of the QES shift.
  • L (large-distance IR length) = L → ∞ after renormalization
    Introduced so that m(r), h(r) → 0 as r → L with L → ∞; appears in horizon corrections and surface gravity.
  • η (UV short-distance regulator)
    Regulates conformalon logarithms at the cut-off surface; drops out of Page-time differences at leading order but is present in absolute entropies.
  • cut-off surface location (c*, v_c) / r_c
    Defines the split between black-hole and radiation regions; Page time and no-island growth are measured along this surface. Chosen by hand as a timelike curve outside the horizon.
axioms (7)
  • domain assumption Island formula / quantum extremal surface prescription for fine-grained radiation entropy (Eq. 1.1)
    Taken as the target quantity to reproduce; not re-derived. Invoked from the introduction through §§4–5.
  • ad hoc to paper Wald-like prescription S_gen = 2π ∫ ε_ab Q^{ab}[ξ] with ξ→0, ∇_{[c}ξ_{d]}→ε_{cd} and ξ ∝ ε ∇ S_gen (Eqs. 2.2–2.3)
    Imported from Pedraza et al. / Hirano; not a standard textbook Wald theorem because X is not a Killing horizon and ξ is not Killing. Load-bearing for the whole Lorentzian claim.
  • domain assumption Polyakov-Liouville action correctly captures the large-c 1-loop conformal anomaly of the matter CFT in 2D (Eq. 2.6)
    Standard in 2D dilaton gravity; used to build both the backreacted stress tensor and the matter piece of S_gen.
  • domain assumption S-wave dimensional reduction of 4D Einstein-Hilbert plus minimally coupled 2D CFT is a faithful model of the dominant Hawking modes (Eqs. 3.2–3.6)
    Stated in §3 and critiqued in §6; greybody factors and vacuum polarization are absent by construction.
  • ad hoc to paper Dilaton is purely classical; only the metric is backreacted at linear order in ε (after Eq. 3.14)
    Simplifies EOM; paper notes that true 4D reduction produces dilaton-conformalon couplings that would correct the dilaton equation.
  • domain assumption Quasi-stationary approximation: black hole is instantaneously equilibrium on light-crossing timescales; |in⟩ and Unruh agree on late-time backreaction
    Used throughout §3.2 and §5; breaks down near complete evaporation (v ∼ O(M_0^3)).
  • ad hoc to paper No-island radiation entropy equals −(c/6)ψ evaluated at the (image) boundary of the radiation region (Eq. 2.12)
    Explicitly not derived from the Wald charge; justified by matching Cardy-Calabrese / conformal anomaly. Needed for the rising part of the Page curve.

pith-pipeline@v1.2.0-grok45-kimik3 · 32335 in / 4568 out tokens · 87614 ms · 2026-07-31T20:40:55.175541+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study the island formula and Page curve for the asymptotically flat eternal and quasi-stationary evaporating black hole solutions within the dimensionally reduced Einstein-Hilbert (DREH) model. In this model, the four-dimensional Einstein-Hilbert action reduces to a two-dimensional dilaton gravity, on top of which the quantum corrections can be incorporated via the Polyakov-Liouville (PL) action for a two-dimensional conformal field theory with a large central charge $c$. This gravity model arises from the s-wave approximation of four-dimensional Einstein-Hilbert gravity and provides a fully gravitational setting in which we study the islands, i.e., we will not require a non-gravitational bath region to collect the radiation, instead it lives in the black hole spacetime itself. The fine-grained entropy of Hawking radiation in the eternal and evaporating black holes within the DREH model was derived using the island rule in \cite{djordjevic2022eternal, djordevic2025evaporating}. The island rule is based on the replica method using the Euclidean gravitational path integral. In this work, we complement the Euclidean approach by providing a Lorentzian prescription for the generalized entropy $S_{\text{gen}}$, in the island formula without invoking the replica trick to compute $S_{\text{gen}}$. The generalized entropy is shown to coincide with Wald-like Noether charge of the combined DREH-PL action. Using this generalized entropy, we determine the quantum extremal surface, the Page time, and the Page curve for the eternal and the evaporating black hole. We conclude with a discussion of the possible extension to the full four-dimensional geometry incorporating vacuum polarization corrections.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 53 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Ðorđević, A

    S. Ðorđević, A. Gočanin, D. Gočanin and V. Radovanović,Page curve for an eternal Schwarzschild black hole in a dimensionally reduced model of dilaton gravity,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 105015 [2207.07409]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  2. [2]

    Ðorđević and V

    S. Ðorđević and V. Radovanović,Page curve for an evaporating Schwarzschild black hole in dimensionally reduced model of dilaton gravity,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 105020 [2507.17855]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  3. [3]

    Bekenstein,Black holes and the second law,Lett

    J.D. Bekenstein,Black holes and the second law,Lett. Nuovo Cim.4(1972) 737

    1972

  4. [4]

    Bekenstein,Black Holes and Entropy,Phys

    J.D. Bekenstein,Black Holes and Entropy,Phys. Rev. D7(1973) 2333

    1973

  5. [5]

    Bardeen, B

    J.M. Bardeen, B. Carter and S.W. Hawking,The four laws of black hole mechanics, Communications in Mathematical Physics31(1973) 161

    1973

  6. [6]

    Hawking,Black Hole Explosions?,Nature248(1974) 30

    S.W. Hawking,Black Hole Explosions?,Nature248(1974) 30. – 32 –

    1974

  7. [7]

    Hawking,Particle Creation by Black Holes,Comm

    S.W. Hawking,Particle Creation by Black Holes,Comm. Math. Phys.43(1975) 199

    1975

  8. [8]

    Hawking,Breakdown of Predictability in Gravitational Collapse,Phys

    S.W. Hawking,Breakdown of Predictability in Gravitational Collapse,Phys. Rev. D14(1976) 2460

    1976

  9. [9]

    Mathur,The information paradox: a pedagogical introduction,Classical and Quantum Gravity 26(2009) 224001

    S.D. Mathur,The information paradox: a pedagogical introduction,Classical and Quantum Gravity 26(2009) 224001

    2009

  10. [10]

    Page,Information in black hole radiation,Physical Review Letters71(1993) 3743–3746

    D.N. Page,Information in black hole radiation,Physical Review Letters71(1993) 3743–3746

    1993

  11. [11]

    Page,Black hole information, inProceedings of the 5th Canadian Conference on General Relativity and Relativistic Astrophysics, vol

    D.N. Page,Black hole information, inProceedings of the 5th Canadian Conference on General Relativity and Relativistic Astrophysics, vol. 1, pp. 1–41, World Scientific, 1994

    1994

  12. [12]

    Almheiri, D

    A. Almheiri, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski and J. Sully,Black Holes: Complementarity or Firewalls?, JHEP02(2013) 062 [1207.3123]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  13. [13]

    Page,Time Dependence of Hawking Radiation Entropy,JCAP09(2013) 028 [1301.4995]

    D.N. Page,Time Dependence of Hawking Radiation Entropy,JCAP09(2013) 028 [1301.4995]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  14. [14]

    Almheiri, D

    A. Almheiri, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski, D. Stanford and J. Sully,An apologia for firewalls,Journal of High Energy Physics2013(2013)

    2013

  15. [15]

    Raju,Lessons from the information paradox,Phys

    S. Raju,Lessons from the information paradox,Phys. Rept.943(2022) 1 [2012.05770]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  16. [16]

    Almheiri, T

    A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian and A. Tajdini,The entropy of Hawking radiation,Rev. Mod. Phys.93(2021) 035002 [2006.06872]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    Teitelboim,Gravitation and Hamiltonian Structure in Two Space-Time Dimensions,Phys

    C. Teitelboim,Gravitation and Hamiltonian Structure in Two Space-Time Dimensions,Phys. Lett. B126(1983) 41

    1983

  18. [18]

    Jackiw,Lower Dimensional Gravity,Nucl

    R. Jackiw,Lower Dimensional Gravity,Nucl. Phys. B252(1985) 343

    1985

  19. [19]

    Penington,Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox,JHEP09(2020) 002 [1905.08255]

    G. Penington,Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox,JHEP09(2020) 002 [1905.08255]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  20. [20]

    Almheiri, N

    A. Almheiri, N. Engelhardt, D. Marolf and H. Maxfield,The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole,JHEP12(2019) 063 [1905.08762]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  21. [21]

    Almheiri, R

    A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan, J. Maldacena and Y. Zhao,The Page curve of Hawking radiation from semiclassical geometry,JHEP03(2020) 149 [1908.10996]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  22. [22]

    Penington, S.H

    G. Penington, S.H. Shenker, D. Stanford and Z. Yang,Replica wormholes and the black hole interior,JHEP03(2022) 205 [1911.11977]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  23. [23]

    Almheiri, T

    A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian and A. Tajdini,Replica Wormholes and the Entropy of Hawking Radiation,JHEP05(2020) 013 [1911.12333]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  24. [24]

    Almheiri, R

    A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan and J. Maldacena,Islands outside the horizon,1910.11077

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1910

  25. [25]

    Ryu and T

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi,Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from ads/cft,Phys. Rev. Lett.96(2006) 181602 [hep-th/0603001]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  26. [26]

    Ryu and T

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi,Aspects of Holographic Entanglement Entropy,JHEP08(2006) 045 [hep-th/0605073]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  27. [27]

    Hubeny, M

    V.E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi,A Covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal,JHEP07(2007) 062 [0705.0016]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  28. [28]

    Lewkowycz and J

    A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena,Generalized gravitational entropy,JHEP08(2013) 090 [1304.4926]. – 33 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  29. [29]

    Faulkner, A

    T. Faulkner, A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena,Quantum corrections to holographic entanglement entropy,JHEP11(2013) 074 [1307.2892]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  30. [30]

    Engelhardt and A.C

    N. Engelhardt and A.C. Wall,Quantum Extremal Surfaces: Holographic Entanglement Entropy beyond the Classical Regime,JHEP01(2015) 073 [1408.3203]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  31. [31]

    Pedraza, A

    J.F. Pedraza, A. Svesko, W. Sybesma and M.R. Visser,Semi-classical thermodynamics of quantum extremal surfaces in Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity,JHEP12(2021) 134 [2107.10358]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  32. [32]

    Hirano,Island formula from Wald-like entropy with backreaction,JHEP02(2024) 125 [2310.03416]

    S. Hirano,Island formula from Wald-like entropy with backreaction,JHEP02(2024) 125 [2310.03416]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    Wald,Black hole entropy is the Noether charge,Phys

    R.M. Wald,Black hole entropy is the Noether charge,Phys. Rev. D48(1993) R3427 [gr-qc/9307038]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  34. [34]

    Iyer and R.M

    V. Iyer and R.M. Wald,Some properties of Noether charge and a proposal for dynamical black hole entropy,Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 846 [gr-qc/9403028]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  35. [35]

    Jacobson, G

    T. Jacobson, G. Kang and R.C. Myers,On black hole entropy,Phys. Rev. D49(1994) 6587 [gr-qc/9312023]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  36. [36]

    Polyakov,Quantum Geometry of Bosonic Strings,Phys

    A.M. Polyakov,Quantum Geometry of Bosonic Strings,Phys. Lett. B103(1981) 207

    1981

  37. [37]

    Christensen and S.A

    S.M. Christensen and S.A. Fulling,Trace Anomalies and the Hawking Effect,Phys. Rev. D15 (1977) 2088

    1977

  38. [38]

    Russo, L

    J.G. Russo, L. Susskind and L. Thorlacius,The Endpoint of Hawking radiation,Phys. Rev. D46 (1992) 3444 [hep-th/9206070]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  39. [39]

    Hartman, E

    T. Hartman, E. Shaghoulian and A. Strominger,Islands in Asymptotically Flat 2D Gravity,JHEP 07(2020) 022 [2004.13857]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  40. [40]

    Buric, V

    M. Buric, V. Radovanovic and A.R. Mikovic,One loop correction for Schwarzschild black hole via 2-D dilaton gravity,Phys. Rev. D59(1999) 084002 [gr-qc/9804083]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  41. [41]

    Fabbri and J

    A. Fabbri and J. Navarro-Salas,Modeling black hole evaporation, World Scientific, Singapore (2005), 10.1142/p378

    doi:10.1142/p378 2005

  42. [42]

    Ðorđević and V

    S. Ðorđević and V. Radovanović,Collapse scenario and final state of evaporation for Schwarzschild black hole in dimensionally reduced model of dilaton gravity,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 105010 [2506.09946]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  43. [43]

    Hashimoto, N

    K. Hashimoto, N. Iizuka and Y. Matsuo,Islands in Schwarzschild black holes,JHEP06(2020) 085 [2004.05863]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  44. [44]

    Pedraza, A

    J.F. Pedraza, A. Svesko, W. Sybesma and M.R. Visser,Microcanonical action and the entropy of Hawking radiation,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 126010 [2111.06912]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  45. [45]

    Fiola, J

    T.M. Fiola, J. Preskill, A. Strominger and S.P. Trivedi,Black hole thermodynamics and information loss in two-dimensions,Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 3987 [hep-th/9403137]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  46. [46]

    Callan, Jr., S.B

    C.G. Callan, Jr., S.B. Giddings, J.A. Harvey and A. Strominger,Evanescent black holes,Phys. Rev. D45(1992) R1005 [hep-th/9111056]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  47. [47]

    Grumiller, W

    D. Grumiller, W. Kummer and D.V. Vassilevich,Dilaton gravity in two-dimensions,Phys. Rept. 369(2002) 327 [hep-th/0204253]. – 34 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  48. [48]

    Mandal, A.M

    G. Mandal, A.M. Sengupta and S.R. Wadia,Classical solutions of two-dimensional string theory, Mod. Phys. Lett. A6(1991) 1685

    1991

  49. [49]

    Almheiri and J

    A. Almheiri and J. Polchinski,Models of AdS2 backreaction and holography,JHEP11(2015) 014 [1402.6334]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  50. [50]

    Calabrese and J

    P. Calabrese and J. Cardy,Entanglement entropy and conformal field theory,J. Phys. A42(2009) 504005 [0905.4013]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  51. [51]

    Mukhanov, A

    V.F. Mukhanov, A. Wipf and A. Zelnikov,On 4-D Hawking radiation from effective action,Phys. Lett. B332(1994) 283 [hep-th/9403018]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  52. [52]

    Frolov, W

    V.P. Frolov, W. Israel and S.N. Solodukhin,On one loop quantum corrections to the thermodynamics of charged black holes,Phys. Rev. D54(1996) 2732 [hep-th/9602105]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  53. [53]

    Hartle and G.T

    J.B. Hartle and G.T. Horowitz,Ground State Expectation Value of the Metric in the 1/Nor Semiclassical Approximation to Quantum Gravity,Phys. Rev. D24(1981) 257

    1981

  54. [54]

    Flanagan and R.M

    E.E. Flanagan and R.M. Wald,Does back reaction enforce the averaged null energy condition in semiclassical gravity?,Phys. Rev. D54(1996) 6233

    1996

  55. [55]

    Hartle and S.W

    J.B. Hartle and S.W. Hawking,Path Integral Derivation of Black Hole Radiance,Phys. Rev. D13 (1976) 2188

    1976

  56. [56]

    Israel,Thermo-field Dynamics of Black Holes,Phys

    W. Israel,Thermo-field Dynamics of Black Holes,Phys. Lett. A57(1976) 107

    1976

  57. [57]

    Birrell and P.C.W

    N.D. Birrell and P.C.W. Davies,Quantum Fields in Curved Space, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK (2, 1984), 10.1017/CBO9780511622632

    doi:10.1017/cbo9780511622632 1984

  58. [58]

    Unruh,Notes on Black Hole Evaporation,Phys

    W.G. Unruh,Notes on Black Hole Evaporation,Phys. Rev. D14(1976) 870

    1976

  59. [59]

    Callan, Jr

    C.G. Callan, Jr. and F. Wilczek,On geometric entropy,Phys. Lett. B333(1994) 55 [hep-th/9401072]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  60. [60]

    Holzhey, F

    C. Holzhey, F. Larsen and F. Wilczek,Geometric and renormalized entropy in conformal field theory,Nucl. Phys. B424(1994) 443 [hep-th/9403108]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  61. [61]

    Calabrese and J.L

    P. Calabrese and J.L. Cardy,Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory,J. Stat. Mech.0406 (2004) P06002 [hep-th/0405152]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  62. [62]

    Wu and J

    C.-H. Wu and J. Xu,Islands in non-minimal dilaton gravity: exploring effective theories for black hole evaporation,JHEP10(2023) 094 [2303.03410]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  63. [63]

    Frolov, P

    V.P. Frolov, P. Sutton and A. Zelnikov,The Dimensional reduction anomaly,Phys. Rev. D61 (2000) 024021 [hep-th/9909086]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  64. [64]

    Balbinot, A

    R. Balbinot, A. Fabbri, V.P. Frolov, P. Nicolini, P. Sutton and A. Zelnikov,Vacuum polarization in the Schwarzschild space-time and dimensional reduction,Phys. Rev. D63(2001) 084029 [hep-th/0012048]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  65. [65]

    Shafiee and Y

    M. Shafiee and Y. Bahrampour,Quantum vacuum effects on the formation of black holes,JHEP06 (2023) 055 [2212.00466]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  66. [66]

    Shafiee and A

    M. Shafiee and A. Sheykhi,Hawking radiation from a semi-classical Schwarzschild black hole, 2605.24487. – 35 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  67. [67]

    Buchbinder, S.D

    I.L. Buchbinder, S.D. Odintsov and I.L. Shapiro,Effective Action in Quantum Gravity, Routledge (9, 2017), 10.1201/9780203758922

    doi:10.1201/9780203758922 2017

  68. [68]

    Candelas,Vacuum Polarization in Schwarzschild Space-Time,Phys

    P. Candelas,Vacuum Polarization in Schwarzschild Space-Time,Phys. Rev. D21(1980) 2185

    1980

  69. [69]

    Howard and P

    K.W. Howard and P. Candelas,Quantum Stress Tensor in Schwarzschild Spacetime,Phys. Rev. Lett.53(1984) 403

    1984

  70. [70]

    Balbinot, A

    R. Balbinot, A. Fabbri and I.L. Shapiro,Vacuum polarization in Schwarzschild space-time by anomaly induced effective actions,Nucl. Phys. B559(1999) 301 [hep-th/9904162]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  71. [71]

    Bardeen,The semi-classical stress-energy tensor in a Schwarzschild background, the information paradox, and the fate of an evaporating black hole,1706.09204

    J.M. Bardeen,The semi-classical stress-energy tensor in a Schwarzschild background, the information paradox, and the fate of an evaporating black hole,1706.09204

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  72. [72]

    Bardeen,Interpreting the semi-classical stress-energy tensor in a Schwarzschild background, implications for the information paradox,1808.08638

    J.M. Bardeen,Interpreting the semi-classical stress-energy tensor in a Schwarzschild background, implications for the information paradox,1808.08638

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  73. [73]

    Riegert,A Nonlocal Action for the Trace Anomaly,Phys

    R.J. Riegert,A Nonlocal Action for the Trace Anomaly,Phys. Lett. B134(1984) 56

    1984

  74. [74]

    Mottola and R

    E. Mottola and R. Vaulin,Macroscopic Effects of the Quantum Trace Anomaly,Phys. Rev. D74 (2006) 064004 [gr-qc/0604051]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  75. [75]

    Mottola,Scalar Gravitational Waves in the Effective Theory of Gravity,JHEP07(2017) 043 [1606.09220]

    E. Mottola,Scalar Gravitational Waves in the Effective Theory of Gravity,JHEP07(2017) 043 [1606.09220]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  76. [76]

    Barvinsky and G.A

    A.O. Barvinsky and G.A. Vilkovisky,The Generalized Schwinger-Dewitt Technique in Gauge Theories and Quantum Gravity,Phys. Rept.119(1985) 1

    1985

  77. [77]

    Barvinsky and G.A

    A.O. Barvinsky and G.A. Vilkovisky,Beyond the Schwinger-Dewitt Technique: Converting Loops Into Trees and In-In Currents,Nucl. Phys. B282(1987) 163

    1987

  78. [78]

    Barvinsky and G.A

    A.O. Barvinsky and G.A. Vilkovisky,Covariant perturbation theory. 2: Second order in the curvature. General algorithms,Nucl. Phys. B333(1990) 471

    1990

  79. [79]

    Dong,Holographic Entanglement Entropy for General Higher Derivative Gravity,JHEP01 (2014) 044 [1310.5713]

    X. Dong,Holographic Entanglement Entropy for General Higher Derivative Gravity,JHEP01 (2014) 044 [1310.5713]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  80. [80]

    Camps,Generalized entropy and higher derivative Gravity,JHEP03(2014) 070 [1310.6659]

    J. Camps,Generalized entropy and higher derivative Gravity,JHEP03(2014) 070 [1310.6659]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

Showing first 80 references.