Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 62 references

Keeping the nonareal polymer area function reorganizes thin-shell wormhole matter, stability, entropy, and images.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-30 18:12 UTC pith:G2WX2IB4

load-bearing objection Solid nonareal thin-shell construction on the polymer-quintessence seed: the flux term is real, the math is clean, and the stability/optics headlines are scoped honestly. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.26882 v1 pith:G2WX2IB4 submitted 2026-07-29 gr-qc

Junction Conditions, Radial Stability, Thermodynamics, Optical Geometry and Appearance of Polymer-Quintessence Thin-Shell Wormholes

Jonathan A. Rebou\c{c}as , Edson Otoniel , M. C. Ara\'ujo , J. Furtado , Celio R. Muniz This is my paper
classification gr-qc
keywords thin-shell wormholespolymer black holesquintessencejunction conditionsradial stabilityoptical geometrynonareal radiusChaplygin gas
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Thin-shell wormholes are usually built as if the seed radial coordinate were the physical circumference radius. This paper shows that a polymer black hole with a Kiselev quintessence environment breaks that identification: the angular factor is H(r)=r²+ℓ², so the true throat area is set by H, not by r. Carrying that nonareal factor all the way through the Israel junction, radial dynamics, thermodynamics, and null geodesics produces a momentum-flux term in the surface balance law. That term changes the local stability test for radius-dependent surface fluids, alters the fixed-parameter first-law and entropy bookkeeping, and—because rays can cross the throat into a second exterior—generates extra inner image branches even though the wormhole and the corresponding black hole share the same exterior critical curve. On the sampled calibrated throats, linear barotropic and variable phantomlike shells stay locally unstable, while a variable Chaplygin gas opens finite linear stability windows. A sympathetic reader cares because the same geometric correction simultaneously reshapes what the shell is made of, whether it can sit still, how its entropy is counted, and what a face-on disk would look like.

Core claim

A reflection-symmetric thin-shell wormhole cut from the positive-lapse sector of the polymer-quintessence geometry must retain the nonareal area function throughout. That choice yields negative surface energy density on every static positive-branch throat, a momentum-flux correction in the conservation law and effective potential, modified local stability criteria and first-law entropy gradients, and additional cross-throat inner image branches despite a shared exterior critical curve; among the three calibrated closures examined, only the variable Chaplygin gas admits finite linear radial stability windows in the sampled windows.

What carries the argument

The nonareal balance law dσ/da = −(2a/H)(σ+p) + (ℓ²/(a H))σ and the associated effective potential V(a)=F(a)−4π² H(a)² σ(a)²/a², whose second derivative at a calibrated static throat supplies the local stability test once a surface equation of state is fixed.

Load-bearing premise

The stability and thermodynamic conclusions rest on three phenomenological surface equations of state that are calibrated once at each static throat and then judged only by the local sign of the potential curvature on finite parameter samples.

What would settle it

Recompute V''(a0) for the same polymer-quintessence seed with a different surface closure or a global (not single-point-calibrated) constitutive law; if no positive-curvature windows appear for any Chaplygin-like model, or if the flux term can be gauged away without changing the area function, the central reorganization claim fails.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Pure-polymer (cq→0) thin shells still carry the flux correction; only the areal limit ℓ→0 recovers standard transparent-shell bookkeeping.
  • Shell entropy is not constant along fixed-parameter radial sequences when the polymer angular sector is kept.
  • Variable Chaplygin surface matter is the only sampled closure that can be locally linearly stable on this seed.
  • Wormhole and black-hole exteriors can share the same critical curve yet differ by inner rings fed by second-exterior disk crossings.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Any effective metric whose angular sector is not r² will force an analogous flux term, so the lesson is not special to this hybrid seed.
  • Equal-power normalization of the two wormhole disks is doing heavy lifting; unequal disk brightness could wash out or exaggerate the reported inner rings.
  • A systematic scan over n and the full (λ,cq,wq) domain for the Chaplygin branch would turn the sampled windows into a stability map useful for model building.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript constructs a reflection-symmetric thin-shell wormhole by gluing two copies of a connected positive-lapse sector of the polymer-quintessence geometry of Araújo et al., retaining the nonareal angular function H(r)=r²+ℓ² throughout. Using the Israel junction conditions, the authors obtain a negative static surface density on every admissible throat, with NEC/SEC combinations controlled by the local lapse slope. The contracted junction identity yields a momentum-flux term in the surface balance law that survives in the pure-polymer limit; this term is carried into an effective radial potential and into a general V''(a0) stability criterion for radius-dependent surface equations of state. For sampled calibrated throats, linear barotropic and variable phantomlike closures remain locally unstable, while a variable Chaplygin gas admits finite linear stability windows. The same nonareal correction modifies fixed-parameter first-law/entropy bookkeeping, and a simplified thin-disk transfer model shows additional inner image branches from cross-throat propagation despite a shared exterior critical curve with the black-hole control.

Significance. If the derivations hold, the paper makes a clear and useful point for the thin-shell literature: once the seed metric is nonareal, reciprocal g_tt and g_rr coefficients alone do not justify the standard transparent-shell bookkeeping. The flux term in Eq. (24), its consistent appearance in V'' (Eq. 28) and dS_Σ/da0 (Eq. 37), and the optical distinction between a shared b_c and extra cross-throat image branches form a coherent geometric chain rather than a cosmetic deformation of known formulas. The work is carefully scoped as local and sample-based, connects directly to prior polymer thin-shell and polymer-quintessence analyses, and treats junction, stability, thermodynamics, and optics within one nonareal framework. That combination is a solid incremental contribution for gr-qc audiences working on effective black-hole seeds and thin-shell phenomenology.

major comments (2)
  1. [Secs. V–VII; Abstract; Sec. IX] Secs. V–VII and Eqs. (41)–(52): the stability headlines (abstract and Sec. IX) rest on single-point calibration of three phenomenological closures at each static throat, followed by the sign of V''(a0) on finite (λ,c_q,w_q,n,E) windows. This is standard thin-shell practice and is disclosed, but the abstract’s phrasing (“admits finite linear radial stability windows”) can be read as a broader existence claim than the sampled local test supports. Please tighten the abstract/conclusion wording to “for the sampled calibrated configurations” consistently, and state explicitly that no global stability classification of the Chaplygin family is claimed.
  2. [Sec. VI] Sec. VI, Eqs. (35)–(37): the fixed-parameter entropy gradient dS_Σ/da0 = −8πℓ² F0/(H0 |F'(a0)|) is a direct thermodynamic counterpart of the flux term and is valuable, but the section mixes a local kinematical temperature with an area-law horizon entropy adopted as a “geometric convention.” Please separate more sharply (i) the model-independent local first-law balance for the shell from (ii) any comparison with horizon entropies S_α=πH(r_α), and avoid language that could be read as establishing thermodynamic stability or a full equilibrium phase structure for the polymer–quintessence background.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. II; Fig. 1] Fig. 1 caption and surrounding text: the disks are smallest positive roots of F(r)=0, not spatial shells; this is stated, but a one-line reminder in the main text near the first citation of Fig. 1 would reduce misreading.
  2. [Secs. V, VII, VIII] The displacement parameter is called both E (stability plots) and sometimes conflated with the Killing energy E in the geodesic section. Consider renaming the throat-offset label (e.g., Δ or ε_off) to avoid collision with E=F(r)ṫ.
  3. [Sec. VIII.A–F] Eq. (64)–(66): the representative optical configuration is well chosen (r_h < a0 < r_ph < r_c), but the main text could briefly note how sensitive the inner-ring visibility is to a0/r_ph before the image discussion in Sec. VIII.F.
  4. [References; Sec. II] References include several 2026 arXiv preprints by overlapping author sets; ensure all cited results used as inputs (especially the seed metric [45] and nearby thin-shell works) are uniquely identified and that any numerical inputs taken from them are stated explicitly.
  5. [Abstract; figures] Minor typography: “butalso” in the abstract; inconsistent en-dashes vs. hyphens in polymer-quintessence; and a few figure labels use encoding artifacts (e.g., “¡2=3” style w_q labels in plot text).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: nonareal flux, V'', entropy, and cross-throat optics are derived from Israel junction plus the seed metric, not forced by fit or self-definition.

full rationale

The load-bearing chain is standard cut-and-paste thin-shell analysis on a fixed seed. Surface stress (Eqs. 18–23) follows from Israel jumps of the extrinsic curvature; the momentum-flux term (Eq. 24) is the contracted junction identity for H=a²+ℓ²; V(a) and V''(a0) (Eqs. 26–28) are obtained by differentiating that balance with a general p(σ,a); thermodynamic dSΣ/da0 (Eq. 37) is the same flux term rewritten in first-law form; optical extra inner branches follow from null continuation across the throat with a second emitting exterior while sharing the exterior critical curve. EOS constants are calibrated once so each static throat satisfies the junction (ws=p0/σ0, etc.) and then held fixed under the local quadratic test—standard practice that does not define the sign of V'' into existence. Citations to the polymer-quintessence seed and nearby thin-shell papers supply the bulk metric and constitutive templates; they do not smuggle the target stability/optical claims by definition. No fitted-data-as-prediction loop, no uniqueness theorem used to forbid alternatives, and no renaming of an empirical pattern as a derived law. Scope limits (phenomenological EOS, local linear V'', finite scans) are modeling assumptions, not circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard GR junction formalism plus an effective polymer-quintessence bulk metric and three phenomenological shell fluids. Free parameters are the seed and EOS knobs scanned numerically; axioms are Israel matching, the effective seed, Kiselev phenomenology, and local linear stability/thermo conventions. No new fundamental entity is postulated.

free parameters (5)
  • λ/M² (polymer scale) = sampled in [0.2, 0.8]; representative 0.5
    Dimensionless polymer parameter scanned in figures (e.g. 0.2, 0.5, 0.8); controls nonareal ℓ=(λM)^{1/3} and enters flux and V'' corrections.
  • cq M^{3wq+1} and wq (Kiselev amplitude and EOS) = representative cqM=0.05, wq=−2/3
    Phenomenological quintessence parameters shaping F(r); scanned (cqM=0.05,0.10,0.15; wq=−0.4,−0.65,−0.9) rather than derived.
  • Throat offset E or a0 (static throat location) = e.g. a0/M=1.8 in optical section
    Each calibrated static throat is chosen by hand in the positive-lapse region; stability is reported vs E with a0=rh+|E|M.
  • EOS calibration constants ws, AP, BC and exponent n = ws=p0/σ0; AP=a0^n p0/σ0; BC=a0^n σ0 p0; n∈{1,2,4}
    Fixed by static junction at each a0; n chosen (1,2,4 for Chaplygin; n=4 for phantom). Stability windows depend on these choices.
  • Disk emission profile (μ, ς, γ, A) and observer placement = ς/M=1/8, γ=−2; μ=rph or a0; robs=rh+0.92(rc−rh)
    Gralla–Lupsasca–Marrone profile parameters and robs fraction of static patch set the synthetic images; not predicted by the junction analysis.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Israel–Lanczos thin-shell junction: S_ij = −(1/8π)([K_ij]−η_ij[K]) on a timelike hypersurface.
    Used throughout Secs. III–IV to obtain σ and p from jumps of extrinsic curvature.
  • domain assumption The hybrid polymer-quintessence line element of Araújo et al. with F(r), H(r)=r²+ℓ² is a valid effective static seed.
    Sec. II imports the metric without re-deriving polymer or Kiselev sectors from first principles.
  • domain assumption Local linear radial stability is decided by the sign of V''(a0) for a=a0(1+εy) with |ε|≪1.
    Sec. V, Eqs. 29–30; standard Poisson–Visser quadratic test, not global or nonlinear stability.
  • ad hoc to paper Surface matter obeys one of three phenomenological closures (linear barotropic, variable phantomlike, variable Chaplygin) with constants calibrated once at equilibrium.
    Sec. VII; constitutive choices inherited from thin-shell literature and fixed by static σ0,p0 before perturbation.
  • domain assumption Shell temperature is the local acceleration temperature TΣ=|F'(a0)|/(4π√F0); horizon entropy uses area law Sα=πH(rα).
    Sec. VI; kinematical/geometric conventions, not derived from shell microphysics.
  • standard math Standard differential geometry and GR geodesic conservation laws on static spherical metrics.
    Used for embeddings, null potentials, and transfer factors g_k.

pith-pipeline@v1.2.0-daily-grok45 · 32787 in / 4018 out tokens · 89056 ms · 2026-07-30T18:12:06.200067+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Thin-shell wormholes built from effective black hole geometries are sensitive not only to the lapse function but also to the choice of areal radius. We construct a reflection-symmetric thin-shell wormhole from the positive-lapse sector of a polymer black hole surrounded by Kiselev-type quintessence and keep the nonareal angular function throughout the junction, stability, thermodynamic, and optical analyses. The Israel junction conditions give a negative surface energy density for every static throat on the positive branch, while the tangential null and intrinsic strong energy combinations are controlled by the local lapse slope. The radial dynamics is written as an effective-potential problem in which the nonareal sector produces a momentum-flux term and modifies the local stability criterion for surface equations of state with explicit radius dependence. For the sampled calibrated configurations, the linear barotropic and variable phantomlike closures remain locally unstable, whereas the variable Chaplygin gas admits finite linear radial stability windows. The same geometric correction also modifies the local first-law balance and shell entropy bookkeeping, while the optical analysis shows that cross-throat propagation generates additional inner image branches despite the wormhole and black hole geometries sharing the same exterior critical curve. These results identify how polymer corrections and a quintessence environment jointly reorganize the matter content, radial response, thermodynamic bookkeeping, and optical appearance of the resulting thin-shell wormhole.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.26882 by Celio R. Muniz, Edson Otoniel, J. Furtado, Jonathan A. Rebou\c{c}as, M. C. Ara\'ujo.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Selected positive-root parameter families for the polymer-quintessence seed geometry. Each colored disk is the smallest [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Static surface energy density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Static energy-condition combinations as functions of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Linear barotropic stability function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Variable phantomlike stability function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Variable Chaplygin stability function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Null-geodesic effective potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Equatorial Euclidean embeddings of representative null geodesics. The rows use [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Face-on images of an infinitesimally thin equatorial emitting disk for the representative polymer–quintessence [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_9.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 56 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Konoplya and A

    R. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Wormholes versus black holes: quasinormal ringing at early and late times, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2016(12), 043, arXiv:1606.00517 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  2. [2]

    Wang, P.-C

    X. Wang, P.-C. Li, C.-Y. Zhang, and M. Guo, Novel shadows from the asymmetric thin-shell wormhole, Physics Letters B 811, 135930 (2020), arXiv:2007.03327 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  3. [3]

    Z. Luo, H. Yu, and J. Li, Observational appearance and additional photon rings of the asymmetric thin-shell wormhole in horndeski theory (2023), arXiv:2312.07018 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    Tan and X

    K. Tan and X. G. Lan, Asymmetric thin-shell wormholes in the kalb-ramond background: Observational characteristics and extra photon rings (2025), arXiv:2510.25485 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    Israel, Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in general relativity, Il Nuovo Cimento B44, 1 (1966)

    W. Israel, Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in general relativity, Il Nuovo Cimento B44, 1 (1966)

    1966

  6. [6]

    Poisson and M

    E. Poisson and M. Visser, Thin-shell wormholes: Linearization stability, Physical Review D52, 7318 (1995), arXiv:gr- qc/9506083

    arXiv 1995

  7. [7]

    J. P. S. Lemos and F. S. N. Lobo, Plane symmetric thin-shell wormholes: Solutions and stability, Physical Review D78, 10.1103/PhysRevD.78.044030 (2008), arXiv:0806.4459 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  8. [8]

    Sharif and M

    M. Sharif and M. Azam, Mechanical stability of cylindrical thin-shell wormholes, The European Physical Journal C73, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2407-9 (2013), arXiv:1308.0196 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  9. [9]

    Ovgun, Rotating thin-shell wormhole, The European Physical Journal Plus131, 10.1140/epjp/i2016-16389-6 (2016), arXiv:1604.08477 [gr-qc]

    A. Ovgun, Rotating thin-shell wormhole, The European Physical Journal Plus131, 10.1140/epjp/i2016-16389-6 (2016), arXiv:1604.08477 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  10. [10]

    M. R. Mehdizadeh, M. K. Zangeneh, and F. S. N. Lobo, Higher-dimensional thin-shell wormholes in third-order lovelock gravity, Physical Review D92, 10.1103/PhysRevD.92.044022 (2015), arXiv:1506.03427 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  11. [11]

    Rahaman, K

    F. Rahaman, K. A. Rahman, S. A. Rakib, and P. K. F. Kuhfittig, Thin-shell wormholes from regular charged black holes, International Journal of Theoretical Physics49, 2364 (2010), arXiv:0909.1071 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  12. [12]

    S. D. Forghani, S. H. Mazharimousavi, and M. Halilsoy, Thin-shells and thin-shell wormholes in new massive gravity, The European Physical Journal C79, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6964-4 (2019), arXiv:1812.05074 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  13. [13]

    Zhang, C

    C.-Y. Zhang, C. Niu, W.-L. Qian, X. Wang, and P. Liu, Traversable thin-shell wormhole in the 4d einstein–gauss–bonnet theory, Chinese Journal of Physics83, 527 (2023), arXiv:2004.14267 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    Tangphati, A

    T. Tangphati, A. Chatrabhuti, D. Samart, and P. Channuie, Thin-shell wormholes in de rham–gabadadze–tolley massive gravity, The European Physical Journal C80, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8294-y (2020), arXiv:1912.12208 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  15. [15]

    E. F. Eiroa and C. Simeone, Stability of chaplygin gas thin-shell wormholes, Physical Review D76, 024021 (2007), arXiv:0704.1136

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  16. [16]

    E. F. Eiroa, Thin-shell wormholes with a generalized chaplygin gas, Physical Review D80, 10.1103/PhysRevD.80.044033 (2009), arXiv:0907.2205 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  17. [17]

    Bejarano and E

    C. Bejarano and E. F. Eiroa, Dilaton thin-shell wormholes supported by a generalized chaplygin gas, Physical Review D84, 10.1103/PhysRevD.84.064043 (2011), arXiv:1106.6340 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  18. [18]

    E. F. Eiroa and G. F. Aguirre, Thin-shell wormholes with a generalized chaplygin gas in einstein–born–infeld theory, The European Physical Journal C72, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-2240-6 (2012), arXiv:1205.2685 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  19. [19]

    Sharif and M

    M. Sharif and M. Azam, Spherical thin-shell wormholes and modified chaplygin gas, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2013(05), 025, arXiv:1310.0326 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  20. [20]

    Varela, A note on linearized stability of schwarzschild thin-shell wormholes with variable equations of state, Physical Review D92, 044002 (2015), arXiv:1310.6420

    V. Varela, A note on linearized stability of schwarzschild thin-shell wormholes with variable equations of state, Physical Review D92, 044002 (2015), arXiv:1310.6420

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  21. [21]

    P. K. F. Kuhfittig, The stability of thin-shell wormholes with a phantom-like equation of state, Acta Phys.Polon.B41:2017- 2019,2010 (2010), arXiv:1008.3111 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  22. [22]

    M. Azam, Born-infeld thin-shell wormholes supported by generalized cosmic chaplygin gas, Astrophysics and Space Science 361, 10.1007/s10509-016-2685-4 (2016), arXiv:1606.08309 [physics.gen-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  23. [23]

    S. D. Forghani, S. H. Mazharimousavi, and M. Halilsoy, Thin-shell wormhole satisfying energy conditions, Physics Letters B804, 135374 (2020), arXiv:1912.04275 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  24. [24]

    S. D. Forghani, S. H. Mazharimousavi, and M. Halilsoy, Thermodynamic stability of a schwarzschild thin-shell wormhole, International Journal of Modern Physics D28, 1950142 (2019), arXiv:1812.04340 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  25. [25]

    E. F. Eiroa, G. Figueroa-Aguirre, M. L. Peñafiel, and S. E. P. Bergliaffa, Dynamical and thermodynamical stabil- ity of a charged thin-shell wormhole, The European Physical Journal C84, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13465-3 (2024), arXiv:2408.14328 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    F. S. N. Lobo and M. E. Rodrigues, Thermodynamics of thin-shell wormholes (2026), arXiv:2606.26370 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  27. [27]

    F. S. N. Lobo and M. E. Rodrigues, Generalized unruh temperature for dynamical thin-shell wormholes (2026), arXiv:2607.03577 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  28. [28]

    Diemer and E

    V. Diemer and E. Smolarek, Dynamics of test particles in thin-shell wormhole spacetimes, Classical and Quantum Gravity 30, 175014 (2013), arXiv:1302.1705

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  29. [29]

    S. H. Mazharimousavi, Generic spherically symmetric thin-shell wormholes with equilibrium throat at the innermost photonsphere are unstable, The European Physical Journal C84, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12678-w (2024), arXiv:2403.08932 [gr-qc]. 26

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    J. B. Achour, F. Lamy, H. Liu, and K. Noui, Polymer schwarzschild black hole: An effective metric, EPL (Europhysics Letters)123, 20006 (2018), arXiv:1803.01152 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  31. [31]

    E. R. Livine and D. R. Terno, Entropy in the classical and quantum polymer black hole models, Classical and Quantum Gravity29, 224012 (2012), arXiv:1205.5733 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  32. [32]

    Liu, J.-X

    Y.-C. Liu, J.-X. Feng, F.-W. Shu, and A. Wang, Extended geometry of gambini-olmedo-pullin polymer black hole and its quasinormal spectrum, Physical Review D104, 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.106001 (2021), arXiv:2109.02861 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  33. [33]

    Liu, Z.-Q

    Y.-L. Liu, Z.-Q. Feng, and X.-D. Zhang, Solar system constraints of a polymer black hole in loop quantum gravity, Physical Review D105, 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.084068 (2022), arXiv:2201.10202 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  34. [34]

    F. M. Mele, J. Münch, and S. Pateloudis, Quantum corrected polymer black hole thermodynamics: mass relations and logarithmic entropy correction, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2022(02), 011, arXiv:2102.04788 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  35. [35]

    Z.-Y. Tu, T. Zhu, and A. Wang, Periodic orbits and their gravitational wave radiations in a polymer black hole in loop quantum gravity, Physical Review D108, 10.1103/PhysRevD.108.024035 (2023), arXiv:2304.14160 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  36. [36]

    Chen and S.-W

    K. Chen and S.-W. Wei, Motion of spinning particles around a polymer black hole in loop quantum gravity, Physical Review D110, 10.1103/PhysRevD.110.024041 (2024), arXiv:2403.14164 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    Münch, A

    J. Münch, A. Perez, S. Speziale, and S. Viollet, Generic features of a polymer quantum black hole, Classical and Quantum Gravity40, 135003 (2023), arXiv:2212.06708 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  38. [38]

    J. A. Rebouças and E. Otoniel, Thin-shell wormholes from entropy-induced black-hole geometries (2026), arXiv:2607.14130 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  39. [39]

    V. V. Kiselev, Quintessence and black holes, Classical and Quantum Gravity20, 1187 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0210040

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  40. [40]

    Younas, M

    A. Younas, M. Jamil, S. Bahamonde, and S. Hussain, Strong gravitational lensing by kiselev black hole, Physical Review D 92, 10.1103/PhysRevD.92.084042 (2015), arXiv:1502.01676 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  41. [41]

    Majeed, M

    B. Majeed, M. Jamil, and P. Pradhan, Thermodynamic relations for kiselev and dilaton black hole, Advances in High Energy Physics2015, 1 (2015), arXiv:1508.04761 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  42. [42]

    Pedraza, L

    O. Pedraza, L. A. López, R. Arceo, and I. Cabrera-Munguia, Geodesics of hayward black hole surrounded by quintessence, General Relativity and Gravitation53, 10.1007/s10714-021-02798-z (2021), arXiv:2008.00061 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  43. [43]

    Visser, The kiselev black hole is neither perfect fluid, nor is it quintessence, Classical and Quantum Gravity37, 045001 (2020), arXiv:1908.11058 [gr-qc]

    M. Visser, The kiselev black hole is neither perfect fluid, nor is it quintessence, Classical and Quantum Gravity37, 045001 (2020), arXiv:1908.11058 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  44. [44]

    C.-H. Wu, X. Liang, and Y.-P. Hu, Kiselev black hole and the ultra-slow evaporating behavior, Physics Letters B879, 140638 (2026), arXiv:2606.19110 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  45. [45]

    M. C. Araújo, J. G. Lima, C. R. Muniz, and J. Furtado, Polymer black hole surrounded by quintessence, European Physical Journal Plus141, 217 (2026)

    2026

  46. [46]

    Javed, A

    F. Javed, A. Waseem, G. Fatima, and B. Almutairi, Stability of thin-shell wormholes via polymer black hole in loop quantum gravity, Physics of the Dark Universe46, 101605 (2024)

    2024

  47. [47]

    J. A. Rebou{ç}as, E. Otoniel, and F. S. N. Lobo, Thin-shell wormholes in cosmic voids (2026), arXiv:2607.11995 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  48. [48]

    Banerjee, K

    A. Banerjee, K. Jusufi, and S. Bahamonde, Stability of a d-dimensional thin-shell wormhole surrounded by quintessence, Gravitation and Cosmology24, 71 (2018), arXiv:1612.06892 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  49. [49]

    Jusufi, Quantum corrected schwarzschild thin-shell wormhole, The European Physical Journal C76, 10.1140/epjc/s10052- 016-4456-3 (2016), arXiv:1607.04070 [gr-qc]

    K. Jusufi, Quantum corrected schwarzschild thin-shell wormhole, The European Physical Journal C76, 10.1140/epjc/s10052- 016-4456-3 (2016), arXiv:1607.04070 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  50. [50]

    Alshal, Linearized stability of bardeen-de sitter thin-shell wormholes, EPL (Europhysics Letters)128, 60007 (2020), arXiv:1909.07811 [gr-qc]

    H. Alshal, Linearized stability of bardeen-de sitter thin-shell wormholes, EPL (Europhysics Letters)128, 60007 (2020), arXiv:1909.07811 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  51. [51]

    Alshal, L

    H. Alshal, L. Ding, A. Hernandez, L. A. Illing, and I. Rydstrom, Linearized stability of harada thin-shell wormholes, General Relativity and Gravitation57, 10.1007/s10714-024-03344-3 (2025), arXiv:2407.08945 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    Bodendorfer, F

    N. Bodendorfer, F. M. Mele, and J. Münch, (b,v)-type variables for black to white hole transitions in effective loop quantum gravity, Phys. Lett. B819, 136390 (2021), arXiv:1911.12646 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  53. [53]

    Bodendorfer, F

    N. Bodendorfer, F. M. Mele, and J. Münch, Effective Quantum Extended Spacetime of Polymer Schwarzschild Black Hole, Class. Quant. Grav.36, 195015 (2019), arXiv:1902.04542 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  54. [54]

    Brahma, C.-Y

    S. Brahma, C.-Y. Chen, and D.-h. Yeom, Testing Loop Quantum Gravity from Observational Consequences of Nonsingular Rotating Black Holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 181301 (2021), arXiv:2012.08785 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  55. [55]

    Ashtekar and P

    A. Ashtekar and P. Singh, Loop Quantum Cosmology: A Status Report, Class. Quant. Grav.28, 213001 (2011), arXiv:1108.0893 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  56. [56]

    Ashtekar, T

    A. Ashtekar, T. Pawlowski, and P. Singh, Quantum Nature of the Big Bang: Improved dynamics, Phys. Rev. D74, 084003 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0607039

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  57. [57]

    Ashtekar and E

    A. Ashtekar and E. Wilson-Ewing, Loop quantum cosmology of Bianchi I models, Phys. Rev. D79, 083535 (2009), arXiv:0903.3397 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  58. [58]

    Ashtekar and A

    A. Ashtekar and A. Barrau, Loop quantum cosmology: From pre-inflationary dynamics to observations, Class. Quant. Grav. 32, 234001 (2015), arXiv:1504.07559 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  59. [59]

    Oriti, L

    D. Oriti, L. Sindoni, and E. Wilson-Ewing, Bouncing cosmologies from quantum gravity condensates, Class. Quant. Grav. 34, 04LT01 (2017), arXiv:1602.08271 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  60. [60]

    Diener, A

    P. Diener, A. Joe, M. Megevand, and P. Singh, Numerical simulations of loop quantum Bianchi-I spacetimes, Class. Quant. Grav.34, 094004 (2017), arXiv:1701.05824 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  61. [61]

    S. E. Gralla, A. Lupsasca, and D. P. Marrone, The Shape of the Black Hole Photon Ring: A Precise Test of Strong-Field General Relativity, Phys. Rev. D102, 124004 (2020), arXiv:2008.03879 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  62. [62]

    C. F. B. Macedo, J. L. Rosa, D. Rubiera-Garcia, and A. Rueda, Multiphoton ring structure of reflection-asymmetric traversable thin-shell wormholes, Phys. Rev. D113, 064004 (2026), arXiv:2510.19677 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2026