Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 67 references

Area-Information Trade-Offs in Acceleration Radiation from Atoms Falling into Black Holes

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Radiation from atoms falling into a black hole obeys a bits-per-area principle: each accessible bit costs at least 4 ln(2) Planck areas of horizon.

desk verdict Internally consistent derivation of Planck-area bit costs in the HBAR framework, but every area-cost claim hangs on Eq. (56), whose physical status the authors themselves concede is unproven. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.27388 v1 pith:Y7SLNGSW submitted 2026-07-29 quant-ph gr-qchep-th

Yusef Maleki , Gustavo Valdivia-Mera , Carlos R. Ordonez , Horacio E. Camblong , Marlan O. Scully This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phgr-qchep-th PACS 04.70.Dy03.67.-a
keywords horizon-brightenedaccelerationradiationarea-informationtrade-offHolevoboundAraki-LiebinequalityFanoFisherinformationspeedlimitBekenstein-HawkingentropyKerrblackhole
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper develops a geometric information-theoretic account of the Horizon-brightened acceleration radiation (HBAR) channel, where atoms falling into a Kerr black hole emit scalar radiation that equilibrates to a thermal state at the Hawking temperature. Its central claim is a bits-per-area principle: in the near-steady, thermally saturated regime, the entropy and information carried by that radiation are bounded by the radiative decrease of the event-horizon area. Concretely, the paper derives a leading-order lower bound of 4 ln(2) ℓ_P² of horizon area per accessible classical bit (from the Holevo bound) and 2 ln(2) ℓ_P² per bit of radiation–environment mutual information (from the Araki–Lieb inequality). It also turns the classical bound into a reliability-aware area requirement via Fano's inequality, and derives a Fisher-information speed limit that bounds the time needed to generate correlations. If the argument holds, black-hole thermodynamics, quantum information, and information geometry are tied together by a quantitative geometric cost that is independent of the black hole's mass.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the HBAR–black-hole thermodynamic correspondence: a formal identification of the radiation triple (S_rad, E_rad, J_rad,z) with the Kerr horizon triple (S_BH, M, J) at the common Hawking temperature, inherited from prior work. This identification converts the Bekenstein–Hawking area law into the radiation-area flux relation Ṡ_rad ≃ (1/4ℓ_P²)|Ȧ_rad|. That relation is then combined with four standard information-theoretic tools — the Holevo bound, the Araki–Lieb inequality, Fano's inequality, and the temporal Fisher information of the occupation-number distribution — to produce the area-cost laws and Fisher-area speed limits.

What would settle it

Compute the leading-order back-reaction of the emitted scalar quanta on the Kerr metric and check whether the horizon area decreases by at least 4 ln(2) ℓ_P² per accessible bit of radiation; if a consistent semiclassical calculation yields no area decrease (or a smaller one) while the radiation carries positive entropy, the area-entropy-flux relation (Eq. 56) and all derived area-cost laws are falsified. A complementary experimental test: reproduce the HBAR master equation in a dynamical-Casimir analogue and compare the entropy of the outgoing radiation with the effective horizon-area change o

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the near-steady, thermally saturated limit of the HBAR process, the von Neumann entropy flux of the emitted radiation is proportional to the magnitude of the radiative contribution to the horizon-area rate, Ṡ_rad ≃ (1/4ℓ_P²)|Ȧ_rad|. From this single area-entropy-flux relation, the paper derives its central bounds: the Holevo bound gives I_class ≲ |δA_rad|/(4 ln(2) ℓ_P²) for accessible classical information; the Araki–Lieb inequality gives I_M(R:E) ≲ |δA_rad|/(2 ln(2) ℓ_P²) for radiation–environment mutual information; Fano's inequality converts the first into a trade-off between decoding-error probability and area; and the temporal Fisher information of the occupation-number distribution

Load-bearing premise

The entire area-cost structure rests on treating the formal thermodynamic correspondence between the radiation field and Kerr horizon thermodynamics as a literal physical identity — specifically, that the radiation entropy is actually paid for by a decrease in the horizon area; if that identification fails, the bounds reduce to restatements of the Bekenstein–Hawking relation S = A/4.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any communication protocol that uses HBAR radiation as its channel must consume horizon area at a fixed leading-order rate: at least 4 ln(2) ℓ_P² ≈ 7.24 × 10⁻⁷⁰ m² per accessible classical bit.
  • The total correlations (classical and quantum) between the outgoing radiation and all other degrees of freedom are capped by the same area budget, at the smaller rate of 2 ln(2) ℓ_P² per bit of mutual information.
  • The bounds are independent of black-hole mass, rotation, and microscopic details of the emission process, holding for any nonextremal Kerr (or Kerr–Newman) background.
  • A prescribed decoding error probability P_error can be folded into the area requirement via Fano's inequality, so a protocol can trade reliability against horizon-area cost.
  • Generating B bits of radiation–environment mutual information takes at least T ≳ B ln(2)/(2 ΔI_max √Ī_F) in the occupation-diagonal reduced dynamics — a Fisher-information speed limit for correlation generation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the formal thermodynamic correspondence is ever promoted to a physical back-reaction statement, the same inequalities predict a measurable shrink of the horizon for each emitted quantum; this signature could be sought in analogue-gravity experiments, such as dynamical-Casimir microwave cavities, where a 'horizon area' analogue is available.
  • The factor-of-two gap between the classical and mutual-information area costs mirrors the generic gap between accessible information and total correlation in bipartite quantum systems; in the pure-state saturation I_M = 2S(R), the radiation–environment state would be maximally correlated, a structure one might probe in cavity-optics simulators.
  • A natural extension is to include the nonnegative entropy-production term from Spohn's inequality away from the saturated regime; the paper's own balance equation (54) already supplies the correction that would tighten or modify the area-cost laws for finite-time protocols.
  • Because the bounds are encoding-independent, the same area budget could plausibly be recovered from a holographic bulk-perspective argument, connecting the result to error-correcting properties of the black-hole interior.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops information-theoretic area-cost bounds for the Horizon-brightened acceleration radiation (HBAR) channel, in which atoms freely falling into a Kerr black hole emit scalar quanta in an optical cavity. Section II derives the thermal steady state at the Hawking temperature from a Markovian master equation. Section III establishes a formal thermodynamic correspondence (S_rad, E_rad, J_rad,z) ↔ (S_BH, M, J), and Eq. (56) promotes this to ḊS^(rad) ≈ (1/4ℓ_P²)|ḊA_rad|. On this basis, Sec. V obtains an accessible-classical-information bound I_class ≲ |δA_rad|/(4 ln2 ℓ_P²), i.e., ≥4 ln2 ℓ_P² per accessible bit; Sec. VI obtains I_M ≲ |δA_rad|/(2 ℓ_P²), i.e., ≥2 ln2 ℓ_P² per mutual-information bit, with Fano reliability; Sec. VII derives Fisher-information speed limits, including T ≳ B ln2/(2 ΔI_max √Ī_F). Appendix A extends the budget to multipartite correlation sharing.

Significance. If the central physical identification were justified, the paper would provide a clean, parameter-free bridge between black-hole thermodynamics, quantum Shannon theory, and information geometry. The derivations from Spohn's theorem, Holevo's bound, Araki–Lieb, Fano's inequality, and the Fisher-information uncertainty relation are internally consistent; the coefficients are transparent; and the bounds are explicitly falsifiable in principle. The main strength is the modular use of standard inequalities rather than fitted parameters or numerical simulation. However, the physical significance is entirely suspended on an unproven identification of the radiative area budget, which the authors themselves acknowledge in the Conclusions. This makes the current status conditional: the paper is technically coherent but does not yet establish an independent bits-per-area principle.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III.C, Eq. (56)] This is the load-bearing step. Eq. (45) establishes only a formal differential correspondence between (S_rad, E_rad, J_rad) and (S_BH, M, J) at β = β_H. Eq. (56) then upgrades this to the physical statement that the radiation entropy flux equals one quarter of the rate of change of a 'radiative horizon-area contribution.' No independent definition of A_rad or back-reaction/energy-conservation calculation is given; the in-falling atoms also carry energy and angular momentum into the horizon, and the cavity may confine the radiation. Without this, Eqs. (63)–(65), (77)–(79), and (90) reduce to restatements of S_rad ≈ |δA_rad|/(4ℓ_P²). The Conclusions explicitly admit that a dedicated operational model is missing. A derivation from energy conservation and the generalized second law, or an explicit and prominent conditional framing, is required before the area-cost laws can be regarded as phy
  2. [Section IV, Eqs. (54)–(56)] The transition from Spohn's inequality σ(t) = ḊS_rad − β_H ḊẼ_rad ≥ 0 to the equality (56) assumes the near-steady, thermally saturated regime σ(t) ≃ 0. The paper gives no quantitative criterion for when this regime holds for the emission and absorption rates of Eqs. (25)–(26), nor an estimate of the neglected entropy production. Since Eq. (56) is integrated over the entire communication interval, the validity of the saturation assumption over that interval should be checked; otherwise the bounds may fail in the very process they are intended to constrain.
  3. [Section VII, Eqs. (95)–(108)] The Fisher speed limit relies on assumptions that are not derived from the HBAR dynamics: the bounded surprisal fluctuation ΔI(t) ≤ ΔI_max and the fixed support of the occupation-number distribution. More importantly, Eq. (100) again invokes the area budget via Eq. (56), so the Fisher relations do not provide an independent verification of the bits-per-area principle. The formal derivation is sound under the stated assumptions, but the presentation should distinguish conditional corollaries of the area budget from genuinely independent information-geometric constraints.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section VI.C, Eq. (90)] Fano's inequality as written uses log₂(|M|−1), which is undefined for |M| = 1. Add an assumption that |M| > 1 or state a convention for this edge case.
  2. [Section III.C, Eq. (48) vs Eq. (56)] The notation A_rad changes from dimensionless in Eq. (48) to dimensionful in Eq. (56). The text explains this, but for readability it would help to use, e.g., A_rad/ℓ_P² explicitly in the dimensionless form.
  3. [Section V.A, Eqs. (58)–(61)] The Bekenstein-bound derivation of the information-rate limit is not used in the later HBAR area-cost argument. Either connect it explicitly to the HBAR setup or remove it to avoid the impression that the area-cost law depends on this bound.
  4. [Section II.C, Eq. (20)] The phrase 'monopole analog of a dipole coupling for a spin-one field' is confusing because the field is scalar. This appears to be a typo for 'spin-zero field' or 'scalar-field coupling.'
  5. [Conclusions, final paragraph] The admission that 'establishing such a connection requires a dedicated operational model' is central to the paper's claim and should be moved to the main derivation (Section III.C) rather than appearing only at the end.

Circularity Check

3 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The area-cost laws reduce by construction to the formal HBAR–black-hole correspondence: the 'radiative horizon-area budget' is defined through the radiation entropy (Eq. 49), so the bits-per-area claims are S=A/4 restated via Holevo and Araki–Lieb.

  1. self definitional [Sec. III.C, Eqs. (46)–(49) and (56); Sec. V.B, Eq. (63)]
    "Combining the HBAR-black-hole thermodynamic correspondence in Eq. (45) with the Bekenstein–Hawking area law (46) yields, in the same near-steady regime, the analogous entropy-area-flux relation ˙Srad ≃ 1/4 | ˙Arad|, ... Applying Eq. (47) to the radiative contribution and using the HBAR-black-hole thermodynamic correspondence (45) yields the power-area relation [20] |˙A_rad| = 4β_H ˙˜E_rad."

    The quantity |A_rad| is not an independently measured or computed area change; it is introduced via the formal correspondence as the area-equivalent of the radiated corotating energy: Eq. (49) sets |A_rad| = 4β_H ˜E_rad, and Eq. (46) is δS_BH = δA/4. Hence S_rad = |A_rad|/(4ℓ_P²) is an identity in the dictionary, not a physical back-reaction result. The 'area-cost law' I_class ≲ |δA_rad|/(4 ln2 ℓ_P²) is then just the Holevo bound I_class ≤ S/ln2 rewritten with the area variable. The headline lower bound of 4 ln(2) ℓ_P² per bit therefore inherits the formal correspondence by construction; if the correspondence is not a physical area budget, the claim reduces to a renaming of the known entropy bound.

  2. self citation load bearing [Sec. III.B, Eq. (45); Sec. III.C, Eqs. (48)–(49)]
    "This structural agreement therefore establishes the formal thermodynamic correspondence [20] (Srad, Erad, Jrad,z) β=βH ←→ (SBH, M, J)."

    The central bridge from radiation thermodynamics to horizon area is the correspondence Eq. (45), whose authority is a citation to Ref. [20] by the same research group. The paper does not re-derive the physical identification of the radiative contribution to the horizon area; instead it uses the cited formal correspondence to convert ˜E_rad into an area rate. Thus the load-bearing step in all area-cost laws is a self-citation that is itself an interpretational dictionary rather than an independently established physical law. This is circular in the sense that the geometric budget is asserted through the same authors' prior framework, not derived within the paper.

1 more flagged steps
  1. other [Sec. VIII, Conclusions]
    "Establishing such a connection, however, requires a dedicated operational model relating the radiative area budget to experimentally accessible observables."

    This is an internal admission that the paper does not provide an operational model connecting |δA_rad| to actual horizon-area changes or to measurable observables. Since the paper's own central bounds are phrased as physical area costs, this admission confirms that the area budget is a formal relabeling of the radiation entropy under the correspondence, and that the claimed bits-per-area principle is not independently established beyond the formal identification.

full rationale

The thermal derivation itself is self-contained: the master equation, detailed balance, and the Planckian rates Eq. (25)–(29) lead independently to ˙S_rad ≃ β_H ˜E_rad. The information-theoretic stages also use external, non-circular results: Holevo bound, Araki–Lieb inequality, Fano's inequality, and the time-information uncertainty relation. No fitted parameters are introduced. However, the paper's signature 'area-cost laws' all flow through Eq. (56), which is obtained by combining the formal HBAR–black-hole correspondence Eq. (45) with δS = δA/4. Because |A_rad| is defined by Eq. (49) as 4β_H ˜E_rad under that same correspondence, the 'radiative horizon-area budget' is the radiation entropy expressed in area units; the bounds in Eqs. (63)–(65), (77)–(79), and (90) are then restatements of S = A/4 plus standard entropy inequalities. This makes the central geometric claim partially circular by construction, though not a numerical fit. The Fisher speed-limit part, Eq. (108), has some independent content, and the paper itself concedes the missing operational model. The score reflects a core reduction-by-definition that affects the main bits-per-area results, without alleging fraud or denying the internal consistency of the thermodynamic derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 9 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the formal HBAR-black-hole thermodynamic correspondence and the near-steady saturated regime, neither of which is derived in this paper. Standard information inequalities then do the work. No free parameters are fitted. The only invented ledger item is the radiative area budget, which lacks an independent falsifiable handle.

assumptions (9)
  • domain assumption Bekenstein–Hawking entropy-area relation δS_BH = δA/(4ℓ_P²)
    Used at Eq. (46) to convert HBAR entropy variations into horizon-area units; standard in black-hole thermodynamics but not derived here.
  • domain assumption HBAR-black-hole thermodynamic correspondence (S_rad, E_rad, J_rad,z) ↔ (S_BH, M, J) at β = β_H
    Introduced in Sec. III B (Eq. 45) and inherited from Ref. [20]; it is called 'formal' but is the load-bearing bridge converting radiation entropy to horizon-area budget.
  • ad hoc to paper Near-steady thermally saturated regime: σ(t) = Ṡ_rad − β_H Ẽ̇_rad ≈ 0
    Assumed in Sec. IV (Eq. 55) to turn the Spohn inequality into the equality Ṡ_rad ≃ β_H Ẽ̇_rad; no given criterion for when this saturation holds.
  • domain assumption Random atom injection yields a Markovian, diagonal master equation (31) with thermal steady state
    Justifies Spohn's theorem and the occupation-diagonal Fisher treatment; standard quantum-optical approximation from prior HBAR work.
  • standard math Holevo bound: I_class ≤ S_phys/(k_B ln 2)
    Statistical bound used in Sec. V to turn entropy into accessible information bits.
  • standard math Araki–Lieb inequality: I_M(R:E) ≤ 2 min{S(R),S(E)} ≤ 2S(R)
    Quantum entropy inequality used in Sec. VI for the mutual-information area law.
  • standard math Fano inequality: I(M:M̂) ≥ H(M) − h₂(P_error) − P_error log₂(|M|−1)
    Reliability-aware bound used in Sec. VI C.
  • standard math Time-information uncertainty relation: |Ṡ| ≤ ΔI Δİ = sqrt(I_F) ΔI
    Quoted from Ref. [34] and used in Sec. VII for Fisher-area speed limits; paper does not re-derive it.
  • domain assumption Negligible initial radiation entropy/correlations; fixed support; ΔI(t) ≤ ΔI_max
    Needed for the finite-process area-cost integrals and the speed-limit bound (Secs. V–VII).
invented entities (1)
  • Radiative horizon-area budget |δA_rad|
    purpose: Geometric resource that is claimed to pay for accessible classical information and radiation–environment mutual information in the HBAR channel.
    Defined through the formal HBAR-BH correspondence (Eq. 45) as |δA_rad| = 4β_H δẼ_rad; the paper states no operational model connects it to measurable observables (Sec. VIII).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Area-Information Trade-Offs in Acceleration Radiation from Atoms Falling into Black Holes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Y7SLNGSW

@misc{pith2026260727388,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Area-Information Trade-Offs in Acceleration Radiation from Atoms Falling into Black Holes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Y7SLNGSW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.27388}
}
read the original abstract

We develop a geometric theory of information processing in the Horizon-brightened acceleration radiation (HBAR) channel, in which the radiative horizon-area change provides an entropy budget for the information carried by the radiation field. Building on the quantum-optical description of atom--field interactions near the horizon and the resulting HBAR thermodynamic correspondence, we derive area-cost laws in the near-steady, thermally saturated regime. The accessible classical information and the mutual information generated between the radiation field and its environment are bounded by the associated radiative horizon-area budget. Reliability is incorporated through Fano's inequality, which translates a prescribed decoding error probability into an area requirement. We further derive Fisher-information speed limits that constrain the statistical evolution of the radiation field and place a lower bound on the duration required for correlation generation. Together, these results establish a bits-per-area principle linking black-hole thermodynamics, information geometry, and quantum information in the HBAR framework.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Peres and D

    A. Peres and D. R. Terno, Quantum information and relativity theory, Reviews of Modern Physics76, 93 (2004)

    2004

  2. [2]

    C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and W. H. Zurek, John wheeler, relativity, and quantum infor- mation, Physics Today62, 40 (2009)

    2009

  3. [3]

    M. Zych, F. Costa, I. Pikovski, and Č. Brukner, Quantum interferometric visibility as a witness of general relativistic proper time, Nature communications2, 505 (2011)

    2011

  4. [4]

    J. D. Bekenstein, Black holes and information theory, Contemporary Physics45, 31 (2004)

    2004

  5. [5]

    Maleki, A

    Y. Maleki, A. Maleki, and M. S. Zubairy, Cosmic entanglement sudden birth: expansion- induced entanglement in hydrogen atoms, Communications Physics7, 401 (2024)

    2024

  6. [6]

    J. D. Bekenstein, Black holes and the second law, Lett. Nuovo Cim.4, 737 (1972)

    1972

  7. [7]

    J. D. Bekenstein, Black holes and entropy, Phys. Rev. D7, 2333 (1973)

    1973

  8. [8]

    S. W. Hawking, Black hole explosions?, Nature248, 30 (1974). 34

    1974

Show all 67 references
  1. [9]

    S. W. Hawking, Particle creation by black holes, Comm. Math. Phys.43, 199 (1975)

    1975

  2. [10]

    J. D. Bekenstein, Black holes and the second law, inJacob Bekenstein: The Conservative Revolutionary(World Scientific, 2020) pp. 303–306

    2020

  3. [11]

    S. A. Fulling, Nonuniqueness of canonical field quantization in Riemannian space-time, Phys. Rev. D7, 2850 (1973)

    1973

  4. [12]

    P. C. Davies, Scalar production in Schwarzschild and Rindler metrics, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General8, 609 (1975)

    1975

  5. [13]

    W. G. Unruh, Notes on black-hole evaporation, Phys. Rev. D14, 870 (1976)

    1976

  6. [14]

    M. O. Scully, S. Fulling, D. M. Lee, D. N. Page, W. P. Schleich, and A. A. Svidzinsky, Quantum optics approach to radiation from atoms falling into a black hole, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences115, 8131 (2018)

    2018

  7. [15]

    Scully and W

    M. Scully and W. E. Lamb Jr, Quantum theory of an optical maser, Phys. Rev. Lett.16, 853 (1966)

    1966

  8. [16]

    M. O. Scully, V. V. Kocharovsky, A. Belyanin, E. Fry, and F. Capasso, Enhancing acceleration radiation from ground-state atoms via cavity quantum electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 243004 (2003)

    2003

  9. [17]

    H. E. Camblong and C. R. Ordóñez, Black hole thermodynamics from near-horizon conformal quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. D71, 104029 (2005)

    2005

  10. [18]

    H. E. Camblong and C. R. Ordóñez, Semiclassical methods in curved spacetime and black hole thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. D71, 124040 (2005)

    2005

  11. [19]

    H. E. Camblong, A. Chakraborty, and C. R. Ordóñez, Near-horizon aspects of acceleration radiation by free fall of an atom into a black hole, Phys. Rev. D102, 085010 (2020)

    2020

  12. [20]

    C. R. Ordóñez, A. Chakraborty, H. E. Camblong, M. O. Scully, and W. Unruh, Quantum aspects of spacetime: a quantum optics view of acceleration radiation and black holes, Philo- sophical Magazine , 1 (2026)

    2026

  13. [21]

    S. Sen, R. Mandal, and S. Gangopadhyay, Equivalence principle and HBAR entropy of an atom falling into a quantum corrected black hole, Phys. Rev. D105, 085007 (2022)

    2022

  14. [22]

    A. Jana, S. Sen, and S. Gangopadhyay, Atom falling into a quantum corrected charged black hole and HBAR entropy, Phys. Rev. D110, 026029 (2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    A. Jana, S. Sen, and S. Gangopadhyay, Inverse logarithmic correction in the horizon brightened accelerationradiationentropyofanatomfallingintoarenormalizationgroupimprovedcharged 35 black hole, Phys. Rev. D111, 085017 (2025)

    2025

  16. [24]

    Chakraborty and B

    K. Chakraborty and B. R. Majhi, Detector response along null geodesics in black hole space- times and in a Friedmann-Lemaitre-Robertson-Walker universe, Phys. Rev. D100, 045004 (2019)

    2019

  17. [25]

    A. Das, S. Sen, and S. Gangopadhyay, Horizon brightened accelerated radiation in the back- ground of braneworld black holes, Phys. Rev. D109, 064087 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    A. Das, A. Krishnan, S. Sen, and S. Gangopadhyay, Derivative coupling in horizon brightened acceleration radiation: A quantum optics approach, Phys. Rev. D112, 065006 (2025)

    2025

  19. [27]

    Övgün and R

    A. Övgün and R. C. Pantig, Hbar entropy of infalling atoms into a gup-corrected schwarzschild black hole and equivalence principle, Physics Letters A568, 131201 (2026)

    2026

  20. [28]

    Spohn, Entropy production for quantum dynamical semigroups, Journal of Mathematical Physics19, 1227 (1978)

    H. Spohn, Entropy production for quantum dynamical semigroups, Journal of Mathematical Physics19, 1227 (1978)

    1978

  21. [29]

    H.SpohnandJ.L.Lebowitz,Irreversiblethermodynamicsforquantumsystemsweaklycoupled to thermal reservoirs, Advances in Chemical Physics: For Ilya Prigogine , 109 (1978)

    1978

  22. [30]

    A. S. Holevo, Bounds for the quantity of information transmitted by a quantum communication channel, Problems of Information Transmission9, 177 (1973), originally published in Russian inProblemy Peredachi Informatsii

    1973

  23. [31]

    Araki and E

    H. Araki and E. H. Lieb, Entropy inequalities, Communications in Mathematical Physics18, 160 (1970)

    1970

  24. [32]

    R. M. Fano,Transmission of Information: A Statistical Theory of Communications(MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1961)

    1961

  25. [33]

    T. S. Han and S. Verdú, Generalizing the Fano inequality, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory40, 1247 (1994)

    1994

  26. [34]

    S. B. Nicholson, L. P. García-Pintos, A. del Campo, and J. R. Green, Time–information un- certainty relations in thermodynamics, Nature Physics16, 1211 (2020)

    2020

  27. [35]

    Ito and A

    S. Ito and A. Dechant, Stochastic time evolution, information geometry, and the cramér-rao bound, Physical Review X10, 021056 (2020)

    2020

  28. [36]

    Maleki and A

    Y. Maleki and A. Maleki, Speed limit of quantum dynamics near the event horizon of black holes, Physics Letters B810, 135700 (2020)

    2020

  29. [37]

    C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler,Gravitation(W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1973). 36

    1973

  30. [38]

    N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies,Quantum Fields in Curved Space, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1982)

    1982

  31. [39]

    L. C. B. Crispino, A. Higuchi, and G. E. A. Matsas, The Unruh effect and its applications, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 787 (2008)

    2008

  32. [40]

    D. G. Boulware, Quantum field theory in Schwarzschild and Rindler spaces, Phys. Rev. D11, 1404 (1975)

    1975

  33. [41]

    A. A. Starobinskii, Amplification of waves during reflection from a rotating black hole, Zh. eksp. teor. Fiz64, 48 (1973)

    1973

  34. [42]

    Frolov and I

    V. Frolov and I. Novikov,Black hole physics: Basic concepts and new developments, Vol. 96 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2012)

    2012

  35. [43]

    M. O. Scully, A. Svidzinsky, and W. G. Unruh, On Bose–Einstein condensation and Unruh– Hawking radiation from a quantum optical perspective, J. Low Temp. Phys.208, 160 (2022)

    2022

  36. [44]

    J. M. Bardeen, B. Carter, and S. W. Hawking, The four laws of black hole mechanics, Comm. Math. Phys.31, 161 (1973)

    1973

  37. [45]

    J. D. Bekenstein, Generalized second law of thermodynamics in black-hole physics, Phys. Rev. D9, 3292 (1974)

    1974

  38. [46]

    S. R. de Groot and P. Mazur,Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics(Dover Publications, New York, 1984)

    1984

  39. [47]

    Lindblad, Entropy, information and quantum measurements, Comm

    G. Lindblad, Entropy, information and quantum measurements, Comm. Math. Phys.33, 305 (1973)

    1973

  40. [48]

    Marcantoni, S

    S. Marcantoni, S. Alipour, F. Benatti, R. Floreanini, and A. T. Rezakhani, Entropy production and non-markovian dynamical maps, Scientific Reports7, 12447 (2017)

    2017

  41. [49]

    Lindblad, Completely positive maps and entropy inequalities, Communications in Mathe- matical Physics40, 147 (1975)

    G. Lindblad, Completely positive maps and entropy inequalities, Communications in Mathe- matical Physics40, 147 (1975)

    1975

  42. [50]

    Ahlswede and P

    R. Ahlswede and P. Lober, Quantum data processing, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory47, 474 (2001)

    2001

  43. [51]

    I.Belfer,Informingphysics: JacobBekensteinandtheinformationalturnintheoreticalphysics, Physics in Perspective16, 69 (2014)

    2014

  44. [52]

    J. D. Bekenstein, Universal upper bound on the entropy-to-energy ratio for bounded systems, Phys. Rev. D23, 287 (1981)

    1981

  45. [53]

    J. D. Bekenstein, Energy cost of information transfer, Physical Review Letters46, 623 (1981). 37

    1981

  46. [54]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, 10th ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2010)

    2010

  47. [55]

    M. M. Wilde,Quantum Information Theory, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2017)

    2017

  48. [56]

    Batina, B

    L. Batina, B. Gierlichs, E. Prouff, M. Rivain, F.-X. Standaert, and N. Veyrat-Charvillon, Mutual information analysis: a comprehensive study, Journal of Cryptology24, 269 (2011)

    2011

  49. [57]

    M. M. Taddei, B. M. Escher, L. Davidovich, and R. L. de Matos Filho, Quantum speed limit for physical processes, Phys. Rev. letters110, 050402 (2013)

    2013

  50. [58]

    Maleki and M

    Y. Maleki and M. S. Zubairy, Universal criteria for entanglement-assisted dynamical speed enhancement, Phys. Rev. A110, 052415 (2024)

    2024

  51. [59]

    R. A. Fisher, Theory of statistical estimation, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society22, 700 (1925)

    1925

  52. [60]

    C. R. Rao, Information and the accuracy attainable in the estimation of statistical parameters, Bulletin of the Calcutta Mathematical Society37, 81 (1945)

    1945

  53. [61]

    Cramér,Mathematical Methods of Statistics(Princeton University Press, 1946)

    H. Cramér,Mathematical Methods of Statistics(Princeton University Press, 1946)

    1946

  54. [62]

    Maleki, M

    Y. Maleki, M. O. Scully, and A. M. Zheltikov, Quantum metrology with superposition spin coherent states: Insights from Fisher information, Phys. Rev. A104, 053712 (2021)

    2021

  55. [63]

    Amari and H

    S.-i. Amari and H. Nagaoka,Methods of Information Geometry, revised and extended edition ed. (American Mathematical Society, 2016)

    2016

  56. [64]

    S. A. Fulling and J. H. Wilson, The equivalence principle at work in radiation from unacceler- ated atoms and mirrors, Physica Scripta94, 014004 (2018)

    2018

  57. [65]

    J. S. Ben-Benjamin, M. O. Scully, S. A. Fulling, D. M. Lee, D. N. Page, A. A. Svidzinsky, M. S. Zubairy, M. J. Duff, R. Glauber, W. P. Schleich, and W. G. Unruh, Unruh Acceleration Radiation Revisited, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A34, 1941005 (2019)

    2019

  58. [66]

    A. A. Svidzinsky, J. S. Ben-Benjamin, S. A. Fulling, and D. N. Page, Excitation of an Atom by a Uniformly Accelerated Mirror through Virtual Transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 071301 (2018)

    2018

  59. [67]

    E. H. Lieb and M. B. Ruskai, Proof of the strong subadditivity of quantum-mechanical entropy, Les rencontres physiciens-mathématiciens de Strasbourg-RCP2519, 36 (1973). 38

    1973

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.