Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 79 references

Adding an excited-state scalar field to a boson star can flip its quadrupolar electric tidal Love number from positive to negative at a finite mass, a qualitative change in how the object responds to an external tide.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 05:09 UTC pith:MJ4J36MX

load-bearing objection First TLN calculation for multi-state boson stars with a plausible sign-flip in k2^E, but the stability filter that defines the headline thresholds is a heuristic and needs a mode-stability check before the numbers are used. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.27587 v1 pith:MJ4J36MX submitted 2026-07-30 gr-qc astro-ph.HEhep-th

Tidal Love numbers of multi-state Boson stars

Xin-Lei Zhao , Jun-Ru Chen , Yong-Qiang Wang This is my paper
classification gr-qc astro-ph.HEhep-th PACS 04.40.-b04.30.-w
keywords multi-state boson starstidal Love numbersexcited scalar fieldcompact objectsgravitational wavesbinding energysynchronized frequencynonsynchronized frequency
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper asks how a boson star built from two scalar fields — one in the ground state and one in the first excited state — responds to an external tidal field. For stable branches of such multi-state boson stars, the quadrupolar electric tidal Love number k_2^E is positive at small mass and then jumps abruptly to negative values at a finite ADM mass, provided the parameters lie above the thresholds mu~1 > 0.891 (synchronized frequency) or omega~0 > 0.777 (nonsynchronized frequency). Below those thresholds the electric Love number stays positive throughout, and the magnetic Love number k_2^B is always negative with a smaller magnitude. Because tidal Love numbers enter gravitational-wave waveforms, a sign change would be a distinctive, observable marker of the excited-state content of a compact bosonic object, separating it from ordinary ground-state boson stars and from black holes whose Love numbers vanish.

Core claim

On multi-state boson stars composed of a ground-state and a first-excited-state complex scalar field, the paper computes the quadrupolar (l=2) electric and magnetic tidal Love numbers from first-order even- and odd-parity perturbations of a spherically symmetric background. The central result is that for stable single-branch solutions, the electric Love number k_2^E begins positive as the ADM mass grows, rises, and then suddenly flips to negative at a finite mass — a 'peak' with a sign change — when the field-mass ratio or frequency satisfies mu~1 > 0.891 (synchronized case) or omega~0 > 0.777 (nonsynchronized case). For smaller parameters the electric Love number remains positive, and the m

What carries the argument

The construction rests on two complex scalar fields (ground and first excited state) minimally coupled to Einstein gravity; the two fields oscillate with either equal (synchronized) or distinct (nonsynchronized) frequencies, and the background solutions are classified into single-branch and double-branch types. Stability is assessed through the binding energy E_B = M - mu0 Q0 - mu1 Q1, whose sign selects the branches for which Love numbers are computed. The tidal response is extracted from the even-parity (electric) and odd-parity (magnetic) metric perturbation equations in the Regge-Wheeler gauge; the electric perturbations couple the two scalar-field perturbations, while the magnetic secto

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the sign of the binding energy E_B = M - mu0 Q0 - mu1 Q1 reliably separates stable from unstable configurations; the paper calls this only a preliminary assessment, and no full linear perturbation stability analysis is performed, so a misclassification would mean the reported sign-flip thresholds describe — or omit — the wrong solutions.

What would settle it

Perform a full linear radial (or generic) perturbation stability analysis of the single-branch MSBS solutions: if any configuration on which k_2^E flips sign is found dynamically unstable, or if a configuration with positive binding energy is found stable, the paper's headline thresholds are not about stable objects. Alternatively, a numerical relativity simulation of a binary MSBS inspiral that directly extracts the induced quadrupole moment as a function of ADM mass and finds no sign reversal would contradict the claim.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • In a binary inspiral, a sign-flipping electric Love number would imprint a non-monotonic tidal phase correction, making multi-state boson stars distinguishable from ground-state boson stars and neutron stars by gravitational-wave observations.
  • The thresholds mu~1 > 0.891 (synchronized) and omega~0 > 0.777 (nonsynchronized) define the region of parameter space in which the sign flip occurs; outside it, the electric Love number remains positive and the object behaves like a conventional boson star.
  • Because the absolute values of both Love numbers are larger for MSBSs than for single-field ground-state boson stars, binaries containing multi-state boson stars are deformed earlier and more strongly during inspiral.
  • The magnetic Love number is always negative and subdominant, so it contributes a smaller, opposite-sign correction to the waveform than the electric part.
  • Only branches with negative binding energy are considered stable and retained for the Love-number computation; the unstable double-branch solutions are excluded from the reported results.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next test is to run a full linear stability analysis of the single-branch solutions; if some of the branches considered 'stable' by the binding-energy criterion turn out to be unstable under radial perturbations, the reported sign-flip thresholds would need revision — though the qualitative flip should persist wherever the background is genuinely stable.
  • The sign flip likely reflects the nodal structure of the excited-state field rather than the details of the two-field coupling, since a similar 'peak' appears in the electric Love numbers of single-field first-excited-state boson stars; this suggests the phenomenon should also appear in other multi-field compact objects such as Dirac-boson or Proca-boson stars.
  • A dynamical extension — evolving a tidally perturbed MSBS or simulating a binary merger — could reveal whether the sign-flip mass coincides with a mode instability or a resonance, turning the flip from a static property into a dynamical event.
  • Mapping the flip mass as a function of mu~1 or omega~0 across the whole stable branch would produce a compact phase diagram of the sign change that gravitational-wave templates could use directly.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies static, spherically symmetric multi-state boson stars (MSBSs) made of a ground-state and a first-excited-state complex scalar field, in both synchronized and nonsynchronized frequency regimes. It classifies the background solutions into single-branch and double-branch families, discusses their ADM mass and binding energy, and then computes the ℓ=2 electric and magnetic tidal Love numbers by solving first-order even- and odd-parity perturbations. The central claim is that, among branches identified as stable by negative binding energy, the electric Love number k2^E starts positive and then jumps to negative values at a finite ADM mass when the parameters satisfy μ̃1>0.891 (synchronized single-branch) or ω̃0>0.777 (nonsynchronized single-branch); for smaller values k2^E remains positive. The magnetic Love numbers are always negative and smaller in magnitude.

Significance. If the stability filter is correct, the predicted sign flip in k2^E is a new and qualitatively interesting tidal signature of an excited-state scalar component, and it would distinguish MSBSs from ground-state boson stars and from black holes. The perturbation setup follows standard Regge–Wheeler methods, and the exterior matching formulas (37) and (42) are standard and appear to be applied correctly. The explicit thresholds for the sign flip provide a sharp, falsifiable target. However, the paper's quantitative claims are currently not fully reproducible because the extraction radius is not specified and no numerical error bars or convergence tests are reported; more importantly, the stability criterion that selects the branches on which the claims are based is only a preliminary binding-energy condition and is never validated by a linear perturbation analysis.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. IV.C, Eq. (48)] The headline thresholds 0.891 and 0.777 are defined only for 'branches containing stable solutions', and stability is judged exclusively by the sign of E_B = M − μ0Q0 − μ1Q1. The paper itself calls this a preliminary assessment, and no perturbative stability analysis is performed. For excited-state boson stars the sign of the binding energy is known not to track dynamical stability (see Ref. [62]), and the loop structures in Figs. 10–11 show that E_B can be positive on parts of branches that are otherwise argued to be stable. Since the reported sign-flip locations in Figs. 13–14 could change if the unstable/unstable-segment classification changes, this is a load-bearing assumption. I recommend either adding a radial perturbation stability analysis for the background solutions or explicitly rephrasing the claims as statements about solutions with E_B<0 rather than about stable MSBSs.
  2. [Sec. V, Eqs. (36), (41)] The extraction radius R_ext is never given a numerical value or a precise definition beyond 'far outside the effective radius'. The ratios y in Eqs. (36) and (41) and the compactness C = M/R_ext used in Eqs. (37) and (42) depend on R_ext, and while the final Love number should be R_ext-independent in the exterior vacuum region, the numerical implementation must demonstrate this. The paper quotes thresholds to 1e-3 and jump masses to 1e-4 without any convergence study or error estimate. Please state R_ext, the matching procedure, and the numerical uncertainty on the quoted thresholds; otherwise the quantitative claims are not reproducible.
  3. [Sec. V.C, Fig. 15] The first branch of the nonsynchronized double-branch solutions contains both E_B<0 and E_B>0 segments according to Fig. 11 (right), but Fig. 15 and the accompanying text appear to plot the Love numbers over the whole branch, including the unstable part near the turning point. This mixes stable and unstable configurations and weakens the conclusion that the reported electric Love numbers are those of stable MSBSs. Please either restrict the plotted/claimed Love numbers to the stable portion of each branch or clearly mark the unstable segments.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. IV.C] The sentence 'stable solutions have negative binding energy' is an assumption, not a demonstrated equivalence; consider wording such as 'we use the sign of E_B as a preliminary stability indicator' throughout.
  2. [Fig. 12] The right panel reports a 'peak' for first-excited-state boson stars, where k2^E jumps from negative to positive. This is a separate result from the MSBS claim and is not mentioned in the abstract; clarify whether it is part of the main conclusions.
  3. [Sec. III, Eq. (24)] The multipole moments M_l, S_l, E_l, B_l are not explicitly defined in terms of the asymptotic metric coefficients for ℓ=2. A brief explicit expansion for the quadrupole case would make the matching procedure easier to follow.
  4. [General] No code or data repository is provided, and the numerical grid and tolerance (10^-5 relative error) are described only briefly. A reproducibility statement or release of the solver would strengthen the paper.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circular derivation: Love numbers are computed by solving explicit perturbation ODEs, with no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction; the only caveats are contextual self-citations and an explicitly preliminary binding-energy stability filter.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. Background solutions are obtained by integrating the Einstein-scalar ODEs (11)-(14) with the boundary conditions (43)-(44). The tidal response is then obtained by integrating the coupled even-parity system (27), (29), (31) and the odd-parity equation (38), whose source terms are fixed by the background fields; the Love numbers are read off from the standard closed-form expressions (37) and (42). Nothing in this chain is fitted to the target quantity: no parameter entering the k2 computation is calibrated to reproduce the sign flip or the thresholds μ̃1=0.891 / ω̃0=0.777, and those thresholds are not restatements of any input. The stability filter used to select branches, E_B = M - μ0 Q0 - μ1 Q1 < 0 (Eq. 48), is explicitly called a 'preliminary assessment' (Sec. IV.C) and is a substantive physical assumption rather than a circular input; it could affect which solutions are physically relevant, but the Love-number values themselves are computed independently for every background. The self-citations (Refs. [68], [71]-[75]) are used for an analog bifurcation remark and as future-work pointers; none is invoked as a uniqueness theorem or as the source of the Love-number result. There is no self-definitional identification, no fit-then-predict step, and no renamed empirical relation. On the circularity axis the paper is clean; any concern about the stability criterion belongs to correctness risk, not circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central calculation rests on standard perturbation theory plus several domain assumptions. The only hand-chosen numerical parameter is the extraction radius R_ext, which is not quantified. The physical mass ratios and frequencies are scanned inputs, not fitted values; no data are fit to produce the thresholds.

free parameters (1)
  • Extraction radius R_ext = not specified numerically
    The y variables and compactness C in Eqs. (36)-(37) and (41)-(42) are evaluated at R_ext, which is only described as 'far outside' the effective radius. Love numbers should be independent of R_ext, but the paper does not state the value used or demonstrate convergence in R_ext.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Two complex scalar fields (ground and first excited) minimally coupled to Einstein gravity with no self-interactions describe the relevant multi-state boson star.
    Used throughout; action (1)-(2). The paper does not consider self-interactions or additional fields.
  • domain assumption Binding-energy sign (E_B < 0 stable, E_B > 0 unstable) is a valid stability criterion for MSBSs.
    Sec. IV.C, Eq. (48); authors say stability can be 'preliminarily assessed' by E_B. Load-bearing because unstable branches are excluded from the TLN results.
  • domain assumption For r > R_ext the scalar fields are negligible and the perturbation equations reduce to vacuum Schwarzschild perturbations, allowing the analytic Love-number formulas (37) and (42).
    Sec. III, Eqs. (33)-(35) and (40)-(42); relies on exponential decay of scalar profiles and a sufficiently large R_ext.
  • domain assumption First-order Regge-Wheeler perturbation theory in a static spherically symmetric background captures the quadrupolar tidal response.
    Sec. III; standard in the cited literature, but applied here to a two-scalar system with no explicit validity check.
  • standard math Thorne's ACMC multipole expansion and the matching of asymptotic metric components to M_l, S_l, E_l, B_l are valid.
    Eq. (25), Ref. [67]; standard definitional framework for tidal multipole moments.
  • domain assumption The finite-element solution on the compactified grid converges with relative error < 1e-5.
    Sec. IV; no mesh-refinement study or solver verification details are given beyond the stated tolerance.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-daily-deepseek · 19338 in / 16600 out tokens · 144273 ms · 2026-08-01T05:09:34.873601+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we calculate the tidal Love numbers of multi-state boson stars (MSBSs) composed of ground state and first excited state complex scalar fields. Under synchronized and nonsynchronized frequency conditions, the background solutions of MSBSs are classified into single-branch and double-branch types. The field functions, ADM mass, and binding energy of different solutions are discussed. We then calculate the quadrupolar ($\ell=2$) electric and magnetic tidal Love numbers for branches containing stable solutions. Our results show that the electric tidal Love numbers are initially positive and then suddenly transition to negative values. This phenomenon occurs when the parameters satisfy $\tilde{\mu}_1 > 0.891$ or $\tilde{\omega}_0 > 0.777$; for smaller values of these parameters, the electric Love numbers remain positive. The magnetic tidal Love numbers are always negative, with absolute values smaller than those of the electric tidal Love numbers.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.27587 by Jun-Ru Chen, Xin-Lei Zhao, Yong-Qiang Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: The matter field functions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: The ADM mass [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: The matter field functions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: The matter field functions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: The ADM mass [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: The matter field functions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: The ADM mass [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: The matter field functions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: The ADM mass [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Left: The binding energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: Left: The binding energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: The electric (solid line) and magnetic (dashed line) tidal Love numbers of the ground state (left) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: Left: The electric tidal Love numbers as a function of the mass of the MSBSs in the case of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14: Left: The electric tidal Love numbers as a function of the mass of the MSBSs in the case of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15: Left: The electric tidal Love numbers as a function of the mass of the MSBSs in the case of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_15.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Single-branch We first discuss the case of synchronized frequency single-branch solutions. Fig. 1 shows the matter field functionsϕ 0 andϕ 1 at different synchronized frequencies, for ˜µ1 = 0.853 and ˜µ0 = 1. It can be seen from the figure that the ground state scalar field functionϕ 0 has no radial node, while the first excited state scalar field functio...

  2. [2]

    Double-branch In the synchronized frequency case, the solutions exhibit two branches for 0.7922≤˜µ1 <0.7976. In Fig. 3, the matter field functionsϕ 0 andϕ 1 are plotted with respect toxand ˜ωfor ˜µ 1 = 0.797 and ˜µ0 = 1. The two left panels represent the first branch of the solutions. As the synchronized frequency increases,ϕ 0 gradually increases whileϕ ...

  3. [3]

    6 shows the matter field functions with the ground state field frequency ˜ω 0 fixed at 0.887

    Single-branch Fig. 6 shows the matter field functions with the ground state field frequency ˜ω 0 fixed at 0.887. As shown in the figure, the ground state field functionϕ 0 has no node in the radial direction, while the first excited state field functionϕ 1 has one node. As the first excited state field frequency ˜ω 1 increases,ϕ 1 gradually decreases, and...

  4. [4]

    Double-branch The ground state and first excited state scalar field functions for ˜ω0 = 0.748 are shown in Fig. 8. The left panels show the matter field functionsϕ 0 andϕ 1 for the first branch solutions, and the right panels show those for the second branch solutions. From these four panels, it can be seen that for both the first and second branch soluti...

  5. [5]

    Post-Newtonian diagnostic of quasiequilibrium binary configurations of compact objects,

    T. Mora and C. M. Will, “Post-Newtonian diagnostic of quasiequilibrium binary configurations of compact objects,” Phys. Rev. D69, 104021 (2004) [erratum: Phys. Rev. D71, 129901 (2005)] doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.71.129901 [arXiv:gr-qc/0312082 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  6. [6]

    Systematic biases from ignoring environmental tidal effects in gravitational wave observations,

    V. De Luca, L. Del Grosso, F. Iacovelli, A. Maselli and E. Berti, “Systematic biases from ignoring environmental tidal effects in gravitational wave observations,” Phys. Rev. D111, no.12, 124046 (2025) doi:10.1103/h4nh-nl5s [arXiv:2503.10746 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    Constraining neutron star tidal Love numbers with gravitational wave detectors,

    E. E. Flanagan and T. Hinderer, “Constraining neutron star tidal Love numbers with gravitational wave detectors,” Phys. Rev. D77, 021502 (2008) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.021502 [arXiv:0709.1915 [astro-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  8. [8]

    The yielding of the earth to disturbing forces,

    A. E. H. Love, “The yielding of the earth to disturbing forces,” Proc. R. Soc. A82(1909), 73-88

    1909

  9. [9]

    On the body tides of the earth, a proposal for the international geodetic association,

    T. Shida, “On the body tides of the earth, a proposal for the international geodetic association,” Proc. Tokyo Math.-Phys. Soc.6(1912), 242-258

    1912

  10. [10]

    Tidal Love numbers of neutron stars,

    T. Hinderer, “Tidal Love numbers of neutron stars,” Astrophys. J.677, 1216-1220 (2008) [erratum: Astrophys. J.697, no.1, 964 (2009)] doi:10.1086/533487 [arXiv:0711.2420 [astro-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  11. [11]

    Relativistic tidal properties of neutron stars,

    T. Damour and A. Nagar, “Relativistic tidal properties of neutron stars,” Phys. Rev. D80, 084035 (2009) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.084035 [arXiv:0906.0096 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  12. [12]

    Metric of a tidally distorted, nonrotating black hole,

    E. Poisson, “Metric of a tidally distorted, nonrotating black hole,” Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 161103 (2005) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.161103 [arXiv:gr-qc/0501032 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  13. [13]

    Tidal coupling of a Schwarzschild black hole and circularly orbiting moon,

    H. Fang and G. Lovelace, “Tidal coupling of a Schwarzschild black hole and circularly orbiting moon,” Phys. Rev. D72, 124016 (2005) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.72.124016 [arXiv:gr-qc/0505156 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  14. [14]

    Relativistic theory of tidal Love numbers,

    T. Binnington and E. Poisson, “Relativistic theory of tidal Love numbers,” Phys. Rev. D80, 084018 (2009) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.084018 [arXiv:0906.1366 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  15. [15]

    Tidal deformations of a spinning compact object,

    P. Pani, L. Gualtieri, A. Maselli and V. Ferrari, “Tidal deformations of a spinning compact object,” Phys. Rev. D92, no.2, 024010 (2015) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.024010 [arXiv:1503.07365 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  16. [16]

    Tidal deformation of a slowly rotating material body. External metric,

    P. Landry and E. Poisson, “Tidal deformation of a slowly rotating material body. External metric,” Phys. Rev. D91, 104018 (2015) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.104018 [arXiv:1503.07366 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  17. [17]

    No-hair theorem for Black Holes in Astrophysical Environments,

    N. G¨ urlebeck, “No-hair theorem for Black Holes in Astrophysical Environments,” Phys. Rev. Lett.114, no.15, 151102 (2015) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.151102 [arXiv:1503.03240 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  18. [18]

    Tidal deformation of a slowly rotating black hole,

    E. Poisson, “Tidal deformation of a slowly rotating black hole,” Phys. Rev. D91, no.4, 044004 (2015) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.044004 [arXiv:1411.4711 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  19. [19]

    Testing strong-field gravity with tidal Love numbers,

    V. Cardoso, E. Franzin, A. Maselli, P. Pani and G. Raposo, “Testing strong-field gravity with tidal Love numbers,” Phys. Rev. D95, no.8, 084014 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.084014 [arXiv:1701.01116 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  20. [20]

    Distinguishing Boson Stars from Black Holes and Neutron Stars from Tidal Interactions in Inspiraling Binary Systems,

    N. Sennett, T. Hinderer, J. Steinhoff, A. Buonanno and S. Ossokine, “Distinguishing Boson Stars from Black Holes and Neutron Stars from Tidal Interactions in Inspiraling Binary Systems,” Phys. Rev. D 96, no.2, 024002 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.024002 [arXiv:1704.08651 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  21. [21]

    Testing the nature of dark compact objects: a status report,

    V. Cardoso and P. Pani, “Testing the nature of dark compact objects: a status report,” Living Rev. Rel.22, no.1, 4 (2019) doi:10.1007/s41114-019-0020-4 [arXiv:1904.05363 [gr-qc]]. 29

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  22. [22]

    Klein-Gordon Geon,

    D. J. Kaup, “Klein-Gordon Geon,” Phys. Rev.172, 1331-1342 (1968) doi:10.1103/PhysRev.172.1331

    doi:10.1103/physrev.172.1331 1968

  23. [23]

    Systems of selfgravitating particles in general relativity and the concept of an equation of state,

    R. Ruffini and S. Bonazzola, “Systems of selfgravitating particles in general relativity and the concept of an equation of state,” Phys. Rev.187, 1767-1783 (1969) doi:10.1103/PhysRev.187.1767

    doi:10.1103/physrev.187.1767 1969

  24. [24]

    Proca stars: Gravitating Bose–Einstein conden- sates of massive spin 1 particles,

    R. Brito, V. Cardoso, C. A. R. Herdeiro and E. Radu, “Proca stars: Gravitating Bose–Einstein conden- sates of massive spin 1 particles,” Phys. Lett. B752, 291-295 (2016) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.11.051 [arXiv:1508.05395 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  25. [25]

    Boson stars with generic selfinteractions,

    F. E. Schunck and D. F. Torres, “Boson stars with generic selfinteractions,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D9, 601-618 (2000) doi:10.1142/S0218271800000608 [arXiv:gr-qc/9911038 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  26. [26]

    Profiles of boson stars with self-interactions,

    F. Kling and A. Rajaraman, “Profiles of boson stars with self-interactions,” Phys. Rev. D97, no.6, 063012 (2018) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.063012 [arXiv:1712.06539 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  27. [27]

    Self-interactions can stabilize excited boson stars,

    N. Sanchis-Gual, C. Herdeiro and E. Radu, “Self-interactions can stabilize excited boson stars,” Class. Quant. Grav.39, no.6, 064001 (2022) doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac4b9b [arXiv:2110.03000 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  28. [28]

    Self-interactions can (also) destabilize bosonic stars,

    M. Brito, C. Herdeiro, N. Sanchis-Gual, E. dos Santos Costa Filho and M. Zilh˜ ao, “Self-interactions can (also) destabilize bosonic stars,” Class. Quant. Grav.41, no.19, 195005 (2024) doi:10.1088/1361- 6382/ad7188 [arXiv:2404.08740 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    Charged boson stars,

    P. Jetzer and J. J. van der Bij, “Charged boson stars,” Phys. Lett. B227, 341-346 (1989) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(89)90941-6

    doi:10.1016/0370-2693(89)90941-6 1989

  30. [30]

    Stability of Charged Boson Stars,

    P. Jetzer, “Stability of Charged Boson Stars,” Phys. Lett. B231, 433-438 (1989) doi:10.1016/0370- 2693(89)90689-8

    doi:10.1016/0370- 1989

  31. [31]

    Charged boson stars and vacuum instabilities,

    P. Jetzer, P. Liljenberg and B. S. Skagerstam, “Charged boson stars and vacuum instabilities,” As- tropart. Phys.1, 429-448 (1993) doi:10.1016/0927-6505(93)90008-2 [arXiv:astro-ph/9305014 [astro-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  32. [32]

    Rotating boson stars in general relativity,

    S. Yoshida and Y. Eriguchi, “Rotating boson stars in general relativity,” Phys. Rev. D56, 762-771 (1997) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.56.762

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.56.762 1997

  33. [33]

    Rotating boson stars and Q-balls,

    B. Kleihaus, J. Kunz and M. List, “Rotating boson stars and Q-balls,” Phys. Rev. D72, 064002 (2005) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.72.064002 [arXiv:gr-qc/0505143 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  34. [34]

    Chains of rotating boson stars,

    R. Gervalle, “Chains of rotating boson stars,” Phys. Rev. D105, no.12, 124052 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.124052 [arXiv:2206.03982 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  35. [35]

    Oscillating soliton stars,

    E. Seidel and W. M. Suen, “Oscillating soliton stars,” Phys. Rev. Lett.66, 1659-1662 (1991) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.1659

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.66.1659 1991

  36. [36]

    Periodic Gravitational Lensing with Oscillating Boson Stars,

    X. Y. Yang, T. Chen and R. G. Cai, “Periodic Gravitational Lensing with Oscillating Boson Stars,” Phys. Rev. Lett.137, no.3, 031403 (2026) doi:10.1103/6w3p-8ym2 [arXiv:2511.19606 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  37. [37]

    Spherical boson stars as black hole mimickers,

    F. S. Guzman and J. M. Rueda-Becerril, “Spherical boson stars as black hole mimickers,” Phys. Rev. D80, 084023 (2009) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.084023 [arXiv:1009.1250 [astro-ph.HE]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  38. [38]

    Constraining scalar field properties with boson stars as black hole mim- ickers,

    J. Barranco and A. Bernal, “Constraining scalar field properties with boson stars as black hole mim- ickers,” AIP Conf. Proc.1396, no.1, 171-175 (2011) doi:10.1063/1.3647542 [arXiv:1108.1208 [astro- ph.CO]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  39. [39]

    The imitation game: Proca stars that can mimic the Schwarzschild shadow,

    C. A. R. Herdeiro, A. M. Pombo, E. Radu, P. V. P. Cunha and N. Sanchis-Gual, “The imitation game: Proca stars that can mimic the Schwarzschild shadow,” JCAP04, 051 (2021) doi:10.1088/1475- 7516/2021/04/051 [arXiv:2102.01703 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  40. [40]

    Black hole mimickers: from theory to observation,

    C. Bambi, R. Brustein, V. Cardoso, A. Chael, U. Danielsson, S. Giri, A. Gupta, P. Heidmann, L. Lehner and S. Liebling,et al.“Black hole mimickers: from theory to observation,” [arXiv:2505.09014 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  41. [41]

    Galactic halos as boson stars,

    J. W. Lee and I. G. Koh, “Galactic halos as boson stars,” Phys. Rev. D53, 2236-2239 (1996) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.53.2236 [arXiv:hep-ph/9507385 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  42. [42]

    A Review on the Scalar Field/Bose-Einstein Condensate Dark Matter Model,

    A. Su´ arez, V. H. Robles and T. Matos, “A Review on the Scalar Field/Bose-Einstein Condensate Dark Matter Model,” Astrophys. Space Sci. Proc.38, 107-142 (2014) doi:10.1007/978-3-319-02063-1 9 [arXiv:1302.0903 [astro-ph.CO]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  43. [43]

    New insights into the for- mation and growth of boson stars in dark matter halos,

    J. Chen, X. Du, E. W. Lentz, D. J. E. Marsh and J. C. Niemeyer, “New insights into the for- mation and growth of boson stars in dark matter halos,” Phys. Rev. D104, no.8, 083022 (2021) 30 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.083022 [arXiv:2011.01333 [astro-ph.CO]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  44. [44]

    Galactic halos and rotating bosonic dark matter,

    J. C. Mourelle and C. Adam, “Galactic halos and rotating bosonic dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D110, no.12, 123001 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.123001 [arXiv:2407.07839 [astro-ph.GA]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  45. [45]

    Tidal Love numbers of Proca stars,

    C. A. R. Herdeiro, G. Panotopoulos and E. Radu, “Tidal Love numbers of Proca stars,” JCAP08, 029 (2020) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/08/029 [arXiv:2006.11083 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  46. [46]

    I-Love-Q relations for gravastars and the approach to the black-hole limit,

    P. Pani, “I-Love-Q relations for gravastars and the approach to the black-hole limit,” Phys. Rev. D92, no.12, 124030 (2015) [erratum: Phys. Rev. D95, no.4, 049902 (2017)] doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.049902 [arXiv:1506.06050 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  47. [47]

    Tidal deformability and I-Love-Q relations for gravastars with polytropic thin shells,

    N. Uchikata, S. Yoshida and P. Pani, “Tidal deformability and I-Love-Q relations for gravastars with polytropic thin shells,” Phys. Rev. D94, no.6, 064015 (2016) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.064015 [arXiv:1607.03593 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  48. [48]

    Tidal Love numbers of axion stars,

    J. R. Chen, L. X. Huang, L. Zhao and Y. Q. Wang, “Tidal Love numbers of axion stars,” Phys. Rev. D109, no.10, 104078 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.104078 [arXiv:2311.11830 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    Tidal response of regular black holes,

    C. Coviello, V. Vellucci and L. Lehner, “Tidal response of regular black holes,” Phys. Rev. D111, no.10, 104073 (2025) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.104073 [arXiv:2503.04287 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    Tidal Love numbers and approxi- mate universal relations for fermion soliton stars,

    E. Berti, V. De Luca, L. Del Grosso and P. Pani, “Tidal Love numbers and approxi- mate universal relations for fermion soliton stars,” Phys. Rev. D109, no.12, 124008 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.124008 [arXiv:2404.06979 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  51. [51]

    Tidal deformation of a slowly rotating material body: Interior metric and Love numbers,

    P. Landry, “Tidal deformation of a slowly rotating material body: Interior metric and Love numbers,” Phys. Rev. D95, no.12, 124058 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.124058 [arXiv:1703.08168 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  52. [52]

    Tidal deformation and dissipation of rotating black holes,

    H. S. Chia, “Tidal deformation and dissipation of rotating black holes,” Phys. Rev. D104, no.2, 024013 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.024013 [arXiv:2010.07300 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  53. [53]

    Tidal Love numbers of neutron stars inf(R) gravity,

    S. S. Yazadjiev, D. D. Doneva and K. D. Kokkotas, “Tidal Love numbers of neutron stars inf(R) gravity,” Eur. Phys. J. C78, no.10, 818 (2018) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6285-z [arXiv:1803.09534 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  54. [54]

    Tidal Love numbers of neutron stars in Rastall gravity,

    L. Meng and D. J. Liu, “Tidal Love numbers of neutron stars in Rastall gravity,” Astrophys. Space Sci.366, no.11, 105 (2021) doi:10.1007/s10509-021-04013-6 [arXiv:2111.03214 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  55. [55]

    Tidal Deformability of Neutron Stars in Unimodular Gravity,

    R. X. Yang, F. Xie and D. J. Liu, “Tidal Deformability of Neutron Stars in Unimodular Gravity,” Universe8, no.11, 576 (2022) doi:10.3390/universe8110576 [arXiv:2211.00278 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  56. [56]

    Love numbers beyond GR from the modified Teukolsky equation,

    P. A. Cano, “Love numbers beyond GR from the modified Teukolsky equation,” JHEP07, 152 (2025) doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2025)152 [arXiv:2502.20185 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    I-Love-Q,

    K. Yagi and N. Yunes, “I-Love-Q,” Science341, 365-368 (2013) doi:10.1126/science.1236462 [arXiv:1302.4499 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  58. [58]

    I-Love-Q Relations in Neutron Stars and their Applications to Astro- physics, Gravitational Waves and Fundamental Physics,

    K. Yagi and N. Yunes, “I-Love-Q Relations in Neutron Stars and their Applications to Astro- physics, Gravitational Waves and Fundamental Physics,” Phys. Rev. D88, no.2, 023009 (2013) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.023009 [arXiv:1303.1528 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  59. [59]

    Effects of neutron-star dynamic tides on gravitational waveforms within the effective-one-body approach,

    T. Hinderer, A. Taracchini, F. Foucart, A. Buonanno, J. Steinhoff, M. Duez, L. E. Kidder, H. P. Pfeif- fer, M. A. Scheel and B. Szilagyi,et al.“Effects of neutron-star dynamic tides on gravitational waveforms within the effective-one-body approach,” Phys. Rev. Lett.116, no.18, 181101 (2016) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.181101 [arXiv:1602.00599 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  60. [60]

    Dynamical Tides in General Relativ- ity: Effective Action and Effective-One-Body Hamiltonian,

    J. Steinhoff, T. Hinderer, A. Buonanno and A. Taracchini, “Dynamical Tides in General Relativ- ity: Effective Action and Effective-One-Body Hamiltonian,” Phys. Rev. D94, no.10, 104028 (2016) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.104028 [arXiv:1608.01907 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  61. [61]

    Dynamical Love Numbers for Kerr Black Holes,

    M. Perry and M. J. Rodriguez, “Dynamical Love Numbers for Kerr Black Holes,” [arXiv:2310.03660 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  62. [62]

    Dynamical tidal response of nonrotating relativistic stars,

    A. Hegade K. R., J. L. Ripley and N. Yunes, “Dynamical tidal response of nonrotating relativistic stars,” Phys. Rev. D109, no.10, 104064 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.104064 [arXiv:2403.03254 [gr-qc]]. 31

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  63. [63]

    Nonlinearities in the tidal Love numbers of black holes,

    V. De Luca, J. Khoury and S. S. C. Wong, “Nonlinearities in the tidal Love numbers of black holes,” Phys. Rev. D108, no.2, 024048 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.024048 [arXiv:2305.14444 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  64. [64]

    Nonlinear relativistic tidal response of neutron stars,

    P. Pani, M. M. Riva, L. Santoni, N. Savi´ c and F. Vernizzi, “Nonlinear relativistic tidal response of neutron stars,” JHEP05, 074 (2026) doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2026)074 [arXiv:2512.14663 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv 2026

  65. [65]

    Multi-state Boson Stars,

    A. Bernal, J. Barranco, D. Alic and C. Palenzuela, “Multi-state Boson Stars,” Phys. Rev. D81, 044031 (2010) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.044031 [arXiv:0908.2435 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  66. [66]

    Dynamical evolution of boson stars. 2. Excited states and selfinteracting fields,

    J. Balakrishna, E. Seidel and W. M. Suen, “Dynamical evolution of boson stars. 2. Excited states and selfinteracting fields,” Phys. Rev. D58, 104004 (1998) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.58.104004 [arXiv:gr- qc/9712064 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv 1998

  67. [67]

    Astrophysical signatures of bo- son stars: quasinormal modes and inspiral resonances,

    C. F. B. Macedo, P. Pani, V. Cardoso and L. C. B. Crispino, “Astrophysical signatures of bo- son stars: quasinormal modes and inspiral resonances,” Phys. Rev. D88, no.6, 064046 (2013) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.064046 [arXiv:1307.4812 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  68. [68]

    Dynamical boson stars,

    S. L. Liebling and C. Palenzuela, “Dynamical boson stars,” Living Rev. Rel.26, no.1, 1 (2023) doi:10.1007/s41114-023-00043-4 [arXiv:1202.5809 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  69. [69]

    Stability of a Schwarzschild singularity,

    T. Regge and J. A. Wheeler, “Stability of a Schwarzschild singularity,” Phys. Rev.108, 1063-1069 (1957) doi:10.1103/PhysRev.108.1063

    doi:10.1103/physrev.108.1063 1957

  70. [70]

    Tidal deformability of boson stars and dark matter clumps,

    R. F. P. Mendes and H. Yang, “Tidal deformability of boson stars and dark matter clumps,” Class. Quant. Grav.34, no.18, 185001 (2017) doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aa842d [arXiv:1606.03035 [astro- ph.CO]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  71. [71]

    Multipole Expansions of Gravitational Radiation,

    K. S. Thorne, “Multipole Expansions of Gravitational Radiation,” Rev. Mod. Phys.52, 299-339 (1980) doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.52.299

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.52.299 1980

  72. [72]

    Multi-state Dirac stars,

    C. Liang, J. R. Ren, S. X. Sun and Y. Q. Wang, “Multi-state Dirac stars,” Eur. Phys. J. C84, no.1, 14 (2024) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-12345-6 [arXiv:2306.11437 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  73. [73]

    Stability of Mini - Boson Stars,

    T. D. Lee and Y. Pang, “Stability of Mini - Boson Stars,” Nucl. Phys. B315, 477 (1989) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(89)90365-9

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(89)90365-9 1989

  74. [74]

    Stability of Boson Stars,

    M. Gleiser, “Stability of Boson Stars,” Phys. Rev. D38, 2376 (1988) [erratum: Phys. Rev. D39, no.4, 1257 (1989)] doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.38.2376

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.38.2376 1988

  75. [75]

    Rotating multistate boson stars,

    H. B. Li, S. Sun, T. T. Hu, Y. Song and Y. Q. Wang, “Rotating multistate boson stars,” Phys. Rev. D 101, no.4, 044017 (2020) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.044017 [arXiv:1906.00420 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  76. [76]

    Self-interacting multistate boson stars,

    H. B. Li, Y. B. Zeng, Y. Song and Y. Q. Wang, “Self-interacting multistate boson stars,” JHEP04, 042 (2021) doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2021)042 [arXiv:2006.11281 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  77. [77]

    Hybrid Proca-boson stars,

    T. X. Ma, C. Liang, J. Yang and Y. Q. Wang, “Hybrid Proca-boson stars,” Phys. Rev. D108, no.10, 104011 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.104011 [arXiv:2304.08019 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  78. [78]

    Dirac-Proca stars,

    T. X. Ma, C. Liang, J. R. Ren and Y. Q. Wang, “Dirac-Proca stars,” Phys. Rev. D109, no.8, 084012 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.084012 [arXiv:2309.11700 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  79. [79]

    Dirac-boson stars,

    C. Liang, J. R. Ren, S. X. Sun and Y. Q. Wang, “Dirac-boson stars,” JHEP02, 249 (2023) doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2023)249 [arXiv:2207.11147 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023