Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 300 references

Infinitely many local higher-spin theories exist in 4d flat space once the light-cone quartic constraints are solved.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-31 15:20 UTC pith:QIZ7H4RJ

load-bearing objection Solid algebraic completion of the light-front HS program: infinite families of local chiral theories (finite and infinite spectra) classified via crystals, plus unitary/quasi-chiral four-point catalogue. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.28183 v1 pith:QIZ7H4RJ submitted 2026-07-30 hep-th

Light-Front approach to 4d massless Higher-Spin interactions

Mattia Serrani This is my paper
classification hep-th
keywords higher-spin gravitylight-front approachchiral higher-spin theoryquartic constraintself-dual Yang-Millsself-dual gravitycelestial CFTspinor-helicity amplitudes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This thesis asks whether massless fields of spin greater than two can interact consistently in four-dimensional flat space without spoiling Poincaré invariance or locality. Working entirely in the light-front formulation, it solves the holomorphic quartic constraint that arises from closing the Poincaré algebra and finds infinitely many solutions: interacting theories that can contain either a finite or an infinite tower of higher-spin fields. All one- and two-derivative cases are classified; they turn out to be consistent subsectors of higher-spin extensions of self-dual Yang–Mills and self-dual gravity, themselves truncations of chiral higher-spin gravity. The same holomorphic condition is shown to be equivalent to OPE associativity in celestial CFT, to the vanishing of tree amplitudes for generic kinematics, and to the Jacobi identity of a kinematic algebra. When both holomorphic and anti-holomorphic vertices are retained, the full quartic constraint recovers ordinary Yang–Mills and gravity, rules out multi-graviton theories, and—once higher-derivative cubics are allowed—admits new unitary local higher-spin theories together with quasi-chiral families. All allowed local four-point amplitudes are then fixed by spinor-helicity factorisation.

Core claim

Solving the light-cone quartic holomorphic constraint yields infinitely many interacting local higher-spin theories in 4d flat space, with either finite or infinite field content; every one- and two-derivative theory is a consistent subsector of HS-SDYM or HS-SDGR. Once higher-derivative cubics are included, the full non-holomorphic quartic constraint admits nontrivial unitary local solutions whose complete set of four-point amplitudes is determined by spinor-helicity factorisation.

What carries the argument

The light-cone quartic holomorphic constraint (and its non-holomorphic completion): the condition that cubic vertices must satisfy so that the deformed Poincaré generators still close at order four, with locality enforced by forbidding 1/q and 1/q-bar poles.

Load-bearing premise

That closing the Poincaré algebra at quartic order in the light-front, together with the light-front definition of locality, is enough to guarantee a Poincaré-invariant local S-matrix and that no further covariant or non-local obstruction appears.

What would settle it

An explicit local, Poincaré-invariant four-point amplitude (or counter-term) for one of the newly classified finite-spectrum higher-spin theories that cannot be reproduced by any solution of the light-cone quartic constraints, or a demonstration that every finite-spectrum solution generates a non-locality once the full non-holomorphic constraint is imposed.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Chiral higher-spin gravity admits infinitely many consistent truncations, including theories with only finitely many fields.
  • All local unitary higher-spin four-point amplitudes in flat space are completely fixed by spinor-helicity factorisation once the allowed cubic spectra are known.
  • Celestial OPE associativity, vanishing of generic tree amplitudes, and the kinematic Jacobi identity are equivalent to the same light-cone holomorphic constraint.
  • Multi-graviton theories remain inconsistent once both chiralities are restored, while new quasi-chiral families become allowed when higher-derivative cubics are present.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The finite-spectrum solutions may supply the simplest controlled settings in which to test whether higher-spin symmetry can cancel ultraviolet divergences without an infinite tower.
  • Because every consistent 4d higher-spin gravity must contain a chiral subsector, the classification gives a complete list of possible ‘seeds’ from which a unitary completion could be grown.
  • The equivalence with celestial OPE associativity suggests that the same algebraic structures control both bulk light-front consistency and boundary celestial CFT, offering a concrete dictionary for future holographic checks.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This thesis analyses 4d massless higher-spin interactions in the light-front formalism by imposing closure of the Poincaré algebra at quartic order. Chapter 2 solves the holomorphic quartic constraint completely for integer helicities (with and without a U(N) gauge group), extracts the resulting algebraic systems for products of cubic couplings, and classifies all one- and two-derivative solutions via “crystals” of couplings; the resulting theories are finite- or infinite-spectrum subsectors of HS-SDYM/HS-SDGR (themselves truncations of chiral higher-spin gravity). Chapter 3 equates the same holomorphic constraint with celestial OPE associativity, the Jacobi identity of the kinematic algebra, and the vanishing of generic tree-level four-point amplitudes. Chapter 4 treats the full (non-holomorphic) quartic constraint, recovers the standard lower-spin yes-go/no-go results (YM, GR, multi-graviton inconsistency), shows that higher-derivative cubics admit nontrivial local solutions, classifies unitary local higher-spin theories and new quasi-chiral families, and determines all local four-point amplitudes by spinor-helicity factorisation plus light-front locality.

Significance. If the algebraic classifications hold, the work substantially enlarges the known landscape of local higher-spin theories in 4d flat space: infinitely many consistent chiral theories exist with either finite or infinite spectra, all one- and two-derivative cases are enumerated, and the full quartic analysis yields unitary local and quasi-chiral families together with a complete set of local four-point amplitudes. The explicit recovery of YM, GR, SDYM, SDGR and the multi-graviton no-go, the transparent link to celestial OPE associativity and kinematic Jacobi identities, and the systematic crystal enumeration constitute concrete, checkable advances inside the light-front deformation programme. The results supply a concrete starting point for covariant completions and for controlled studies of mild non-locality beyond the chiral sector.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2.4.1–2.4.2] §2.4.1–2.4.2 (crystal construction and equivalence under S4 permutations plus affine integer shifts of free helicities): the claim of a complete classification of all one- and two-derivative theories rests on the assertion that every solution is captured by a crystal generated from a seed and reduced by the stated equivalence. While the enumeration is systematic and recovers all known limits, an explicit completeness argument (or an exhaustive computer-assisted check that no inequivalent seeds remain) is not supplied; without it the “all” statement is slightly stronger than the evidence.
  2. [§4.6–4.7] §4.6–4.7 (unitary local and quasi-chiral solutions, four-point amplitudes): the passage from light-cone Hamiltonian densities that solve the full quartic constraint to unitary, local, Poincaré-invariant S-matrix elements is made via spinor-helicity factorisation and the light-front locality condition (no 1/q, 1/q-bar poles). A short explicit check that the resulting amplitudes satisfy the remaining Poincaré Ward identities (or a reference to where this is verified) would close the logical gap between the algebraic solutions and the claimed S-matrix statements.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§2.3] Notation for the independent momentum variables A, B, C (Eq. 2.3.3) and for the auxiliary sums k±, kω± is introduced densely; a short summary table in Appendix 2.A or 2.B would improve readability.
  2. [Outline / Ch. 1] Several self-citations to the three underlying papers are inevitable in a thesis, but a single sentence in the introduction clarifying which theorems are new versus reproduced would help the reader navigate priority.
  3. Typographical inconsistencies appear in the numbering of appendices (2.7 vs 2.A) and in a few helicity summations (e.g., around Eq. 2.3.61); a global proof-reading pass is needed.
  4. [§3.6] Chapter 3’s dictionary between light-cone couplings and celestial OPE coefficients is clear, yet an explicit one-line map for the most general Metsaev-like solution (Eq. 2.3.44–45) would make the equivalence fully transparent.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

No significant circularity: algebraic solutions of independently established light-cone Poincaré constraints; thesis self-citations are structural, not load-bearing.

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Outline and main results; Chapters 2–4 (papers [7],[8],[9])]
    "The thesis is based on the following three research papers: 1. [7] M. Serrani, "On classification of (self-dual) higher-spin gravities in flat space," JHEP 08 (2025) 032... 2. [8] M. Serrani, "Associativity of celestial OPE, higher spins and self-duality," JHEP 04 (2026) 047... 3. [9] M. Serrani, "Massless spinning fields on the Light-Front: quartic vertices and amplitudes," arXiv:2602.12826."

    The body chapters are essentially the author’s own three papers. This is structural self-citation typical of a thesis, not a load-bearing circular step: the constraints being solved are attributed to Metsaev and Ponomarev–Skvortsov, and the new content is the explicit solution/classification, not a uniqueness claim justified only by self-citation. Mild and non-central; does not raise the score above 1.

full rationale

The thesis solves the light-cone quartic holomorphic and full (non-holomorphic) constraints that follow from requiring the Poincaré algebra to close on interacting massless fields in the light-front Hamiltonian formalism. Those dynamical constraints (and the cubic vertices they act on) were derived in the independent prior literature of Bengtsson–Bengtsson–Brink and Metsaev, and reviewed/extended by Ponomarev–Skvortsov; the present work takes them as given equations and finds their solutions (coupling relations, spectra/crystals, four-point amplitudes). No parameter is fitted to external data and re-predicted; no uniqueness theorem is imported solely from the author’s prior work to forbid alternatives; the crystal enumeration and spinor-helicity factorisation are constructive algebraic procedures, not renamings of fitted patterns. Self-citations to the author’s three constituent papers are the normal thesis packaging of those results and do not substitute for the external Metsaev/Ponomarev–Skvortsov starting point. Residual methodological assumptions (sufficiency of light-front locality and of the quartic constraints for a Poincaré-invariant local S-matrix) are the standard working hypotheses of the programme, not circular reductions. Score 1 only for the mild, non-load-bearing self-citation structure of a three-paper thesis.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 6 axioms · 3 invented entities

The work rests on the standard light-front realisation of the Poincaré algebra, the light-cone locality principle (no inverse transverse momenta), and the assumption that cubic vertices plus quartic closure exhaust the consistent local deformations. No numerical free parameters are fitted. Invented entities are the classified families of theories themselves, which are defined by the solutions of the constraints rather than postulated ad hoc.

axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Poincaré algebra iso(3,1) must close order-by-order on the light-front generators after cubic (and quartic) deformations.
    Foundational requirement of the light-front deformation procedure (Ch. 1–2); standard since Dirac/Bengtsson/Metsaev.
  • domain assumption Locality forbids poles in transverse momenta q, q-bar while allowing 1/β = 1/p+ poles that arise from solving constraints.
    Stated repeatedly (e.g. §1.2, §2.2); defines which densities are admissible.
  • domain assumption The holomorphic sector of the quartic constraint receives no contribution from genuine quartic vertices and must close by itself.
    Observed by Metsaev and used as the starting point for chiral theories (Eqs. 2.2.10).
  • standard math Cubic vertices are exhausted by the light-cone classification h ~ C P-bar^λ / β^λ + c.c.; coupling constants C_λ1λ2λ3 are the only free data at cubic order.
    Standard result of Bengtsson–Bengtsson–Brink / Metsaev, reviewed in §1.2 and App. 2.A.
  • domain assumption Fields may transform in matrix representations of U(N), SO(N) or USp(N), or as singlets; colour-ordered traces factor the constraint.
    Introduced in §2.2–2.3 and App. 2.D–2.E to enlarge the solution space.
  • domain assumption Unitary local theories require the full (non-holomorphic) quartic constraint plus parity/unitarity relations between holomorphic and anti-holomorphic couplings.
    Used in Ch. 4 to select the physical spectrum and amplitudes.
invented entities (3)
  • Crystals (small and large) of two- and one-derivative couplings no independent evidence
    purpose: Organise self-consistent finite or infinite sets of cubic vertices that solve the holomorphic constraint.
    Defined operationally in §2.4 as the closure of the ‘talking’ relation among couplings; not postulated independently of the algebra.
  • Quasi-chiral higher-spin theories no independent evidence
    purpose: New families that mix chiralities yet remain local at quartic order.
    Identified as solutions of the full quartic constraint in §4.6; defined by their coupling patterns.
  • Finite-spectrum local chiral higher-spin theories in 4d flat space no independent evidence
    purpose: Counter-examples to the expectation that only infinite towers work.
    Exist as explicit solutions of the holomorphic systems (Ch. 2); their existence is the main yes-go result.

pith-pipeline@v1.2.0-daily-grok45 · 68959 in / 3478 out tokens · 68009 ms · 2026-07-31T15:20:18.905252+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

This thesis studies $4d$ massless higher-spin interactions in the Light-Front approach by analysing the closure of the Poincar\'e algebra at quartic order. We first solve the light-cone quartic holomorphic constraint in flat space and show the existence of infinitely many interacting local higher-spin theories with either a finite or infinite number of fields. We classify all one- and two-derivative theories, corresponding to higher-spin extensions of gauge and gravitational interactions. These are consistent subsectors of higher-spin extensions of self-dual Yang--Mills and gravity, themselves truncations of Chiral Higher-Spin Gravity. We then clarify the relation between the OPE associativity in celestial CFT, the vanishing of tree-level amplitudes for generic kinematics, the Jacobi identity of the associated ''gauge algebra'' (kinematical algebra), and the light-cone holomorphic constraints. Finally, we investigate the non-holomorphic quartic constraint involving both MHV and anti-MHV vertices. We recover the existence of Yang-Mills theory and gravity, and the inconsistency of interacting multi-graviton theories. We then show that once higher-derivative cubic vertices are included, nontrivial solutions to the full quartic constraint exist. We classify all unitary local higher-spin theories, identify new families of local quasi-chiral theories, and determine all local higher-spin four-point amplitudes using the spinor-helicity formalism together with locality in the form of consistent factorisation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.28183 by Mattia Serrani.

Figure 4.1
Figure 4.1. Figure 4.1: Generic CC¯ exchange with contact term C λ1,λ2,λ3,λ4 . When (4.1.1) is satisfied only for k = 1, 2, 3,6 additional exchange diagrams are required, as discussed in the main text. Accordingly, local quartic vertices fall into four classes: self￾consistent quartic vertices (k = 0);7 vertices requiring a single-channel exchange (k = 1); vertices requiring exchange in two channels (k = 2), as in Yang–Mills th… view at source ↗
Figure 4.2
Figure 4.2. Figure 4.2: Holomorphic constraint [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p171_4_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.3
Figure 4.3. Figure 4.3: Non-holomorphic constraint. Starting from Eq. (4.4.8) and using the explicit form of the densities (4.3.13), we obtain the following expression: [H3, Jz− 3 ] =X λi,ω Z d 12q δ X i qi ! 9 2 h (−) ω β1(λ1 + ω − λ2) − β2(λ2 + ω − λ1) (β1 + β2) 2ω+1 β λ3 3 β λ4 4 β λ1 1 β λ2 2 × C 1234ωP¯λ12+ω−1 12 P −λ34+ω 34 i ϕ λ1 q1 ϕ λ2 q2 ϕ λ3 q3 ϕ λ4 q4 , (4.4.10) where we denote C 1234ω ≡ C λ1,λ2,ωC¯−ω,λ3,λ4 the prod… view at source ↗
Figure 4.4
Figure 4.4. Figure 4.4: Exchange diagrams for a generic pair CC¯. Reformulation. A reformulation of the solutions is as follows. Starting from an (n, m) exchange diagram (λ1, λ2, ω, λ3, λ4) as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p201_4_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.5
Figure 4.5. Figure 4.5: A quartic vertex with a single exchange exists when the conditions (4.6.8) are [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p202_4_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.6
Figure 4.6. Figure 4.6: Exchange diagrams between C 2,5,1 and C¯−2,−5,−1 . This exchange diagram respects the conditions (4.6.8), with some of the fields having maximal helicity (4.6.9). In particular, we have λ1 ≤ λ2 + ω , λ2 = λ1 + ω + 2 , λ3 = λ4 + ω + 2 , λ4 ≤ λ3 + ω , (4.6.10a) λ12 + ω > 0 , −λ34 + ω > 0 , λ12 = λ34 . (4.6.10b) 30In the tables, this exchange would correspond to a free coefficient ki [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figu… view at source ↗
Figure 4.7
Figure 4.7. Figure 4.7: Relevant exchange diagrams for parity invariant pairs of cubic abelian vertices. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p203_4_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.8
Figure 4.8. Figure 4.8: CC¯ exchange diagrams for parity invariant pairs of cubic abelian vertices. Following (4.6.8), we find the conditions λ1 ≤ λ2 + λ3 , λ2 ≤ λ1 + λ3 , λ3 ≤ λ1 + λ2 . (4.6.13) These are the usual triangular inequalities. Therefore, each triangle with integer unit length defines an allowed pair of abelian cubic vertices. Notice the interesting analogy with the holo￾morphic constraint: here as well, the only a… view at source ↗
Figure 4.9
Figure 4.9. Figure 4.9: Linearised curvature terms (Rs ) 3 for higher-spins are consistent to the quartic level. The same triangular inequalities were already found in [285, 286]. The underlying idea is to construct linearised higher-spin curvatures Rs µ1ν1,...,µsνs (de Wit–Freedman curvatures) and use them to build invariant tensors, such as Rs1Rs2Rs3 . By counting the number of free indices, one finds that such constructions … view at source ↗
Figure 4.10
Figure 4.10. Figure 4.10: Exchange diagram for a pair of cubic abelian vertices with one opposite helicity. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p205_4_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.11
Figure 4.11. Figure 4.11: Example of abelian cubic vertices that satisfy the quartic constraint. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p205_4_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.12
Figure 4.12. Figure 4.12: Example of non-abelian cubic vertices that satisfy the quartic constraint. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p206_4_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.13
Figure 4.13. Figure 4.13: Generic CC¯ unitary exchange. Considering that in this case, each of the helicities can end up on the external legs, we obtain the following conditions: λ1 ≤ λ2 + λ3 , λ2 ≤ λ1 + λ3 , λ3 ≤ λ1 + λ2 . λ1 + λ2 + λ3 > 0 . (4.6.15) These conditions correspond to the triangle inequalities. As discussed above, a theory contain￾ing an arbitrary number of pairs of parity-related cubic abelian couplings that satis… view at source ↗
Figure 4.14
Figure 4.14. Figure 4.14: The left diagram, by quartic consistency, implies the presence of the right one. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p208_4_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.15
Figure 4.15. Figure 4.15: The left diagram, by quartic consistency, implies the presence of the right one. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p209_4_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.16
Figure 4.16. Figure 4.16: The left diagram, by quartic consistency, implies the presence of the right one. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p210_4_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.17
Figure 4.17. Figure 4.17: New exchange diagram between C λ1,λ2,n1 and C¯λ2,−λ2,−n1 . In the case that the external fields are maximal (4.6.9), we find λ1 = n1 + n2 2 , λ2 = n1 + n3 2 . (4.6.34) In any case, no higher-spin fields are allowed. Let us note that we have discarded possible solutions involving half-integer helicities. This is because we are considering only bosonic fields here. However, it seems that allowing for half… view at source ↗
Figure 4.18
Figure 4.18. Figure 4.18: Exchange diagram involving a generic vertex and the anti-MHV cubic vertex of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p212_4_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.19
Figure 4.19. Figure 4.19: The left diagram, by quartic consistency, implies the presence of the right one. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p213_4_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.20
Figure 4.20. Figure 4.20: Holomorphic constraints between C −2,−2,2 and C λ,−λ,−2 . The holomorphic constraints fix the coefficients of the two anti-holomorphic cubic vertices C −2,−2,2 and C λ,−λ,−2 to be equal, implying C −2,−2,2 = C λ,−λ,−2 . As discussed in [7], these two anti-holomorphic cubic couplings are consistent even in the absence of additional higher-spin vertices, since they form a consistent truncation of the full… view at source ↗
Figure 4.21
Figure 4.21. Figure 4.21: (2, 2) CC¯ exchange diagram. This exchange diagram does not admit a quartic vertex that solves the quartic constraint. Interestingly, the same phenomenon also appears in the case of Yang-Mills-like interactions. In this case, we obtain the quasi-chiral HS-YM theory — an extension of self-dual Yang-Mills [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p213_4_21.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.22
Figure 4.22. Figure 4.22: Generic four-point exchange diagram. Given a four-point scattering, as shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p239_4_22.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 181 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Cubic interaction terms for arbitrary spin,

    A. K. H. Bengtsson, I. Bengtsson, and L. Brink, “Cubic interaction terms for arbitrary spin,”Nucl. Phys.B227(1983) 31

    1983

  2. [2]

    Cubic interaction terms for arbitrarily extended Supermultiplets,

    A. K. H. Bengtsson, I. Bengtsson, and L. Brink, “Cubic interaction terms for arbitrarily extended Supermultiplets,”Nucl. Phys.B227(1983) 41

    1983

  3. [3]

    Interacting Higher Spin Gauge Fields on the Light Front,

    A. K. H. Bengtsson, I. Bengtsson, and N. Linden, “Interacting Higher Spin Gauge Fields on the Light Front,”Class. Quant. Grav.4(1987) 1333

    1987

  4. [4]

    Poincare invariant dynamics of massless higher spins: Fourth order analysis on mass shell,

    R. R. Metsaev, “Poincare invariant dynamics of massless higher spins: Fourth order analysis on mass shell,”Mod. Phys. Lett.A6(1991) 359–367

    1991

  5. [5]

    Smatrix approach to massless higher spins theory. 2: The Case of internal symmetry,

    R. R. Metsaev, “Smatrix approach to massless higher spins theory. 2: The Case of internal symmetry,” Mod. Phys. Lett.A6(1991) 2411–2421

    1991

  6. [6]

    Light-Front Higher-Spin Theories in Flat Space,

    D. Ponomarev and E. D. Skvortsov, “Light-Front Higher-Spin Theories in Flat Space,”J. Phys.A50 (2017), no. 9, 095401,1609.04655

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  7. [7]

    On classification of (self-dual) higher-spin gravities in flat space,

    M. Serrani, “On classification of (self-dual) higher-spin gravities in flat space,”JHEP08(2025) 032, 2505.12839

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    Associativity of celestial OPE, higher spins and self-duality,

    M. Serrani, “Associativity of celestial OPE, higher spins and self-duality,”JHEP04(2026) 047, 2508.16804

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  9. [9]

    Massless spinning fields on the Light-Front: quartic vertices and amplitudes,

    M. Serrani, “Massless spinning fields on the Light-Front: quartic vertices and amplitudes,”2602.12826

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  10. [10]

    Snowmass White Paper: Higher Spin Gravity and Higher Spin Symmetry,

    X. Bekaert, N. Boulanger, A. Campoleoni, M. Chiodaroli, D. Francia, M. Grigoriev, E. Sezgin, and E. Skvortsov, “Snowmass White Paper: Higher Spin Gravity and Higher Spin Symmetry,”2205.01567

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  11. [11]

    The foundation of the general theory of relativity.,

    A. Einstein, “The foundation of the general theory of relativity.,”Annalen Phys.49(1916), no. 7, 769–822

    1916

  12. [12]

    The Making of the standard model,

    S. Weinberg, “The Making of the standard model,”Eur. Phys. J. C34(2004) 5–13,hep-ph/0401010

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  13. [13]

    Lights all askew in the heavens

    New York Times, “Lights all askew in the heavens.” http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/arts/LightsAllAskew.pdf, Nov., 1919

    1919

  14. [14]

    A Determination of the Deflection of Light by the Sun’s Gravitational Field, from Observations Made at the Total Eclipse of May 29, 1919,

    F. W. Dyson, A. S. Eddington, and C. Davidson, “A Determination of the Deflection of Light by the Sun’s Gravitational Field, from Observations Made at the Total Eclipse of May 29, 1919,”Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A220(1920) 291–333. [15]LIGO Scientific, VirgoCollaboration, B. P. Abbottet al., “Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole ...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1919

  15. [17]

    Measurement of the Electron Magnetic Moment,

    X. Fan, T. G. Myers, B. A. D. Sukra, and G. Gabrielse, “Measurement of the Electron Magnetic Moment,”Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023), no. 7, 071801,2209.13084

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  16. [18]

    Revised and Improved Value of the QED Tenth-Order Electron Anomalous Magnetic Moment,

    T. Aoyama, T. Kinoshita, and M. Nio, “Revised and Improved Value of the QED Tenth-Order Electron Anomalous Magnetic Moment,”Phys. Rev. D97(2018), no. 3, 036001,1712.06060

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  17. [19]

    Invariant Variation Problems,

    E. Noether, “Invariant Variation Problems,”Gott. Nachr.1918(1918) 235–257,physics/0503066

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1918

  18. [20]

    The Swampland: Introduction and Review,

    E. Palti, “The Swampland: Introduction and Review,”Fortsch. Phys.67(2019), no. 6, 1900037, 1903.06239. 231 232CHAPTER 4. BIBLIOGRAPHY

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  19. [21]

    Broken Symmetry and the Mass of Gauge Vector Mesons,

    F. Englert and R. Brout, “Broken Symmetry and the Mass of Gauge Vector Mesons,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 13(1964) 321–323

    1964

  20. [22]

    Broken Symmetries and the Masses of Gauge Bosons,

    P. W. Higgs, “Broken Symmetries and the Masses of Gauge Bosons,”Phys. Rev. Lett.13(1964) 508–509

    1964

  21. [23]

    Global Conservation Laws and Massless Particles,

    G. S. Guralnik, C. R. Hagen, and T. W. B. Kibble, “Global Conservation Laws and Massless Particles,” Phys. Rev. Lett.13(1964) 585–587

    1964

  22. [24]

    Prospects for Fundamental Physics with LISA,

    E. Barausseet al., “Prospects for Fundamental Physics with LISA,”Gen. Rel. Grav.52(2020), no. 8, 81,2001.09793

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  23. [25]

    The Science of the Einstein Telescope,

    A. Abacet al., “The Science of the Einstein Telescope,”2503.12263

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  24. [26]

    Maggiore,Gravitational Waves

    M. Maggiore,Gravitational Waves. Vol. 1: Theory and Experiments. Oxford University Press, 2007

    2007

  25. [27]

    Effective one-body approach to general relativistic two-body dynamics,

    A. Buonanno and T. Damour, “Effective one-body approach to general relativistic two-body dynamics,” Phys. Rev. D59(1999) 084006,gr-qc/9811091

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  26. [28]

    Legacy of Boson Clouds on Black Hole Binaries,

    G. M. Tomaselli, T. F. M. Spieksma, and G. Bertone, “Legacy of Boson Clouds on Black Hole Binaries,” Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024), no. 12, 121402,2407.12908

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  27. [29]

    One-loop divergencies in the theory of gravitation,

    G. ’t Hooft and M. J. G. Veltman, “One-loop divergencies in the theory of gravitation,”Ann. Inst. H. Poincare Phys. Theor. A20(1974), no. 1, 69–94

    1974

  28. [30]

    The Ultraviolet Behavior of Einstein Gravity,

    M. H. Goroff and A. Sagnotti, “The Ultraviolet Behavior of Einstein Gravity,”Nucl. Phys.B266(1986) 709–736

    1986

  29. [31]

    Gravitational collapse and space-time singularities,

    R. Penrose, “Gravitational collapse and space-time singularities,”Phys. Rev. Lett.14(1965) 57–59

    1965

  30. [32]

    The occurrence of singularities in cosmology. III. Causality and singularities,

    S. Hawking, “The occurrence of singularities in cosmology. III. Causality and singularities,”Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A300(1967) 187–201

    1967

  31. [33]

    Tabletop experiments for quantum gravity: a user’s manual,

    D. Carney, P. C. E. Stamp, and J. M. Taylor, “Tabletop experiments for quantum gravity: a user’s manual,”Class. Quant. Grav.36(2019), no. 3, 034001,1807.11494

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  32. [34]

    Phenomenological Lagrangians,

    S. Weinberg, “Phenomenological Lagrangians,”Physica A96(1979), no. 1-2, 327–340

    1979

  33. [35]

    Effective field theory,

    H. Georgi, “Effective field theory,”Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.43(1993) 209–252

    1993

  34. [36]

    General relativity as an effective field theory: The leading quantum corrections,

    J. F. Donoghue, “General relativity as an effective field theory: The leading quantum corrections,” Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 3874–3888,gr-qc/9405057

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  35. [37]

    Quantum gravity in everyday life: General relativity as an effective field theory,

    C. P. Burgess, “Quantum gravity in everyday life: General relativity as an effective field theory,”Living Reviews in Relativity7(Apr., 2004)

    2004

  36. [38]

    N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies,Quantum Fields in Curved Space. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1982

    1982

  37. [39]

    Black hole explosions,

    S. W. Hawking, “Black hole explosions,”Nature248(1974) 30–31

    1974

  38. [40]

    Particle Creation by Black Holes,

    S. W. Hawking, “Particle Creation by Black Holes,”Commun. Math. Phys.43(1975) 199–220. [Erratum: Commun.Math.Phys. 46, 206 (1976)]

    1975

  39. [41]

    Black holes and entropy,

    J. D. Bekenstein, “Black holes and entropy,”Phys. Rev. D7(1973) 2333–2346

    1973

  40. [42]

    The Four laws of black hole mechanics,

    J. M. Bardeen, B. Carter, and S. W. Hawking, “The Four laws of black hole mechanics,”Commun. Math. Phys.31(1973) 161–170

    1973

  41. [43]

    A Planar Diagram Theory for Strong Interactions,

    G. ’t Hooft, “A Planar Diagram Theory for Strong Interactions,”Nucl. Phys. B72(1974) 461

    1974

  42. [44]

    Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity,

    G. ’t Hooft, “Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity,”Conf. Proc. C930308(1993) 284–296, gr-qc/9310026

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  43. [45]

    One Massless Particle Equals Two Dirac Singletons: Elementary Particles in a Curved Space. 6.,

    M. Flato and C. Fronsdal, “One Massless Particle Equals Two Dirac Singletons: Elementary Particles in a Curved Space. 6.,”Lett.Math.Phys.2(1978) 421–426

    1978

  44. [46]

    Central Charges in the Canonical Realization of Asymptotic Symmetries: An Example from Three-Dimensional Gravity,

    J. D. Brown and M. Henneaux, “Central Charges in the Canonical Realization of Asymptotic Symmetries: An Example from Three-Dimensional Gravity,”Commun. Math. Phys.104(1986) 207–226

    1986

  45. [47]

    The World as a hologram,

    L. Susskind, “The World as a hologram,”J. Math. Phys.36(1995) 6377–6396,hep-th/9409089

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  46. [48]

    String theory and quark confinement,

    A. M. Polyakov, “String theory and quark confinement,”Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.68(1998) 1–8, hep-th/9711002. 233

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  47. [49]

    The large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,

    J. M. Maldacena, “The large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231–252,hep-th/9711200

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  48. [50]

    Supergauge Transformations in Four-Dimensions,

    J. Wess and B. Zumino, “Supergauge Transformations in Four-Dimensions,”Nucl. Phys. B70(1974) 39–50

    1974

  49. [51]

    M. B. Green, J. H. Schwarz, and E. Witten,SUPERSTRING THEORY. VOL. 1: INTRODUCTION. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 7, 1988

    1988

  50. [52]

    M. B. Green, J. H. Schwarz, and E. Witten,SUPERSTRING THEORY. VOL. 2: LOOP AMPLITUDES, ANOMALIES AND PHENOMENOLOGY. Cambridge University Press, 7, 1988

    1988

  51. [53]

    Light Cone Superspace and the Ultraviolet Finiteness of the N=4 Model,

    S. Mandelstam, “Light Cone Superspace and the Ultraviolet Finiteness of the N=4 Model,”Nucl. Phys. B213(1983) 149–168

    1983

  52. [54]

    The Ultraviolet Finiteness of the N=4 Yang-Mills Theory,

    L. Brink, O. Lindgren, and B. E. W. Nilsson, “The Ultraviolet Finiteness of the N=4 Yang-Mills Theory,”Phys. Lett. B123(1983) 323–328

    1983

  53. [55]

    Supergravity and the S Matrix,

    M. T. Grisaru, H. N. Pendleton, and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, “Supergravity and the S Matrix,”Phys. Rev. D15(1977) 996

    1977

  54. [56]

    Renormalizability Properties of Supergravity,

    S. Deser, J. H. Kay, and K. S. Stelle, “Renormalizability Properties of Supergravity,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 38(1977) 527,1506.03757

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1977

  55. [57]

    Supergravity,

    P. Van Nieuwenhuizen, “Supergravity,”Phys. Rept.68(1981) 189–398

    1981

  56. [58]

    Wess and J

    J. Wess and J. Bagger,Supersymmetry and supergravity. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1992

    1992

  57. [59]

    Candidate to the role of higher spin symmetry,

    E. S. Fradkin and M. A. Vasiliev, “Candidate to the role of higher spin symmetry,”Ann. Phys.177 (1987) 63

    1987

  58. [60]

    Open strings,

    C. Angelantonj and A. Sagnotti, “Open strings,”Phys. Rept.371(2002) 1–150,hep-th/0204089. [Erratum: Phys.Rept. 376, 407 (2003)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  59. [61]

    Anomaly cancellations in type I D-9 - anti-D-9 system and the USp(32) string theory,

    S. Sugimoto, “Anomaly cancellations in type I D-9 - anti-D-9 system and the USp(32) string theory,” Prog. Theor. Phys.102(1999) 685–699,hep-th/9905159

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  60. [62]

    New Non-Supersymmetric Tachyon-Free Strings,

    Z. K. Baykara, H.-C. Tarazi, and C. Vafa, “New Non-Supersymmetric Tachyon-Free Strings,” 2406.00185

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  61. [63]

    String Theory Beyond the Planck Scale,

    D. J. Gross and P. F. Mende, “String Theory Beyond the Planck Scale,”Nucl. Phys. B303(1988) 407–454

    1988

  62. [64]

    The High-Energy Behavior of String Scattering Amplitudes,

    D. J. Gross and P. F. Mende, “The High-Energy Behavior of String Scattering Amplitudes,”Phys. Lett. B197(1987) 129–134

    1987

  63. [65]

    High-Energy Symmetries of String Theory,

    D. J. Gross, “High-Energy Symmetries of String Theory,”Phys. Rev. Lett.60(1988) 1229

    1988

  64. [66]

    Free massless fields of arbitrary spin in the de sitter space and initial data for a higher spin superalgebra,

    M. A. Vasiliev, “Free massless fields of arbitrary spin in the de sitter space and initial data for a higher spin superalgebra,”Fortsch. Phys.35(1987) 741–770

    1987

  65. [67]

    Consistent equations for interacting massless fields of all spins in the first order in curvatures,

    M. A. Vasiliev, “Consistent equations for interacting massless fields of all spins in the first order in curvatures,”Annals Phys.190(1989) 59–106

    1989

  66. [68]

    Relativistic theory of particles with arbitrary intrinsic angular momentum,

    E. Majorana, “Relativistic theory of particles with arbitrary intrinsic angular momentum,”Nuovo Cim. 9(1932) 335–344

    1932

  67. [69]

    Relativistic wave equations,

    P. A. M. Dirac, “Relativistic wave equations,”Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A155(1936) 447–459

    1936

  68. [70]

    On unitary representations of the inhomogeneous lorentz group,

    E. P. Wigner, “On unitary representations of the inhomogeneous lorentz group,”Annals Math.40 (1939) 149–204

    1939

  69. [71]

    The unitary representations of the Poincar\’e group in any spacetime dimension,

    X. Bekaert and N. Boulanger, “The unitary representations of the Poincar\’e group in any spacetime dimension,”SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes30(2021) 1,hep-th/0611263

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  70. [72]

    The continuous spin limit of higher spin field equations,

    X. Bekaert and J. Mourad, “The continuous spin limit of higher spin field equations,”JHEP01(2006) 115,hep-th/0509092

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  71. [73]

    Elementary particles with continuous spin,

    X. Bekaert and E. D. Skvortsov, “Elementary particles with continuous spin,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. A32 (2017), no. 23n24, 1730019,1708.01030. 234CHAPTER 4. BIBLIOGRAPHY

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  72. [74]

    Group Theoretical Discussion of Relativistic Wave Equations,

    V. Bargmann and E. P. Wigner, “Group Theoretical Discussion of Relativistic Wave Equations,”Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.34(1948) 211

    1948

  73. [75]

    Relativistic Field Theories in Three-dimensions,

    B. Binegar, “Relativistic Field Theories in Three-dimensions,”J. Math. Phys.23(1982) 1511–1517

    1982

  74. [76]

    Lagrangian formulation for arbitrary spin. 1. the boson case,

    L. P. S. Singh and C. R. Hagen, “Lagrangian formulation for arbitrary spin. 1. the boson case,”Phys. Rev.D9(1974) 898–909

    1974

  75. [77]

    Lagrangian formulation for arbitrary spin. 2. the fermion case,

    L. P. S. Singh and C. R. Hagen, “Lagrangian formulation for arbitrary spin. 2. the fermion case,”Phys. Rev.D9(1974) 910–920

    1974

  76. [78]

    On relativistic wave equations for particles of arbitrary spin in an electromagnetic field,

    M. Fierz and W. Pauli, “On relativistic wave equations for particles of arbitrary spin in an electromagnetic field,”Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond.A173(1939) 211–232

    1939

  77. [79]

    On a theory of particles with half integral spin,

    W. Rarita and J. Schwinger, “On a theory of particles with half integral spin,”Phys. Rev.60(1941) 61

    1941

  78. [80]

    Massless fields with integer spin,

    C. Fronsdal, “Massless fields with integer spin,”Phys. Rev.D18(1978) 3624

    1978

  79. [81]

    Massless Fields with Half Integral Spin,

    J. Fang and C. Fronsdal, “Massless Fields with Half Integral Spin,”Phys. Rev.D18(1978) 3630

    1978

  80. [82]

    Singletons and Massless, Integral Spin Fields on de Sitter Space (Elementary Particles in a Curved Space. 7.,

    C. Fronsdal, “Singletons and Massless, Integral Spin Fields on de Sitter Space (Elementary Particles in a Curved Space. 7.,”Phys.Rev.D20(1979) 848–856

    1979

Showing first 80 references.