Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 40 references

Quantum tomography of top quark pairs constrains the CP-violating top-Yukawa coupling with precision comparable to direct ttH and tH searches.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 00:17 UTC pith:QWDCEWXC

load-bearing objection This paper does something genuinely new — it confronts the full 15-parameter CMS top-pair spin density matrix with a CP-violating top-Yukawa coupling at one loop — but its headline bound leans on the one piece of the calculation whose scheme-independence is asserted rather than shown. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.28761 v1 pith:QWDCEWXC submitted 2026-07-30 hep-ph hep-exhep-th

Quantum Tomography of Top Quarks as a Probe of Charge-Parity Violation

Eren Erdogan , Kirtimaan A. Mohan , Keping Xie , Marcel Yanez This is my paper
classification hep-ph hep-exhep-th PACS 11.30.Er13.88.+e14.65.Ha
keywords top quark pair productionquantum tomographyspin density matrixFano coefficientsCP violationtop-Higgs Yukawa couplingone-loop renormalizationLHC spin correlations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper shows that the full spin density matrix of top-antitop pairs produced at the LHC, already measured in all fifteen parameters by CMS as a two-qubit state, can be used to constrain a CP-violating component in the top quark's Yukawa coupling to the Higgs boson. The coupling enters the production amplitudes only at one loop, producing spin correlations that are odd under CP and do not affect the cross section. The authors compute the first complete renormalized one-loop correction to the density matrix, including both absorptive and dispersive terms, and compare all fifteen Fano coefficients with the published CMS tomographic data and its covariance. At a_t = 1 they obtain 95% CL intervals -1.40 < b_t < 1.23 from spin information alone and -1.01 < b_t < 1.26 when combined with kinematic distributions, close to the |b_t| ~ 1.1 reach of direct ttH and tH production. The claim matters because additional CP violation beyond the Standard Model is needed to explain the matter-antimatter asymmetry, and the top-Higgs interaction is a natural place for it to appear.

Core claim

The central claim is that a full quantum-state tomography of the top-antitop pair, already measured by CMS, is a viable and independent probe of CP violation in the top-Yukawa interaction. For a scalar-plus-pseudoscalar top-Higgs coupling, the Higgs exchange enters gg and q qbar production at one loop and shifts the production density matrix by terms quadratic in the couplings plus a CP-odd term linear in the product of the two couplings. After renormalizing the one-loop amplitudes in the on-shell scheme, including absorbing the pseudoscalar self-energy into imaginary field-renormalization constants with no new independent counterterms, the authors obtain the complete fifteen-coefficient pre

What carries the argument

The machinery is the two-qubit spin density matrix of the top-antitop pair, expanded in fifteen Fano coefficients (six polarizations and nine spin-spin correlations) in the event frame. The paper computes the one-loop Higgs-induced correction to the gg and q qbar production amplitudes, renormalizes it in the on-shell scheme with imaginary top-quark field renormalization constants, and integrates the resulting density matrix over each CMS bin with parton luminosities. The key structural property is the separation of the CP-odd shift into a dispersive piece, odd under naive time reversal and populating the antisymmetric correlations, and an absorptive piece, fixed by CPT to be proportional to

Load-bearing premise

The result depends on the renormalization prescription used to define the finite CP-odd spin correlation: if a different on-shell scheme changes the size of the dispersive antisymmetric correlation, the central constraint shifts, since only the absorptive polarization channel is scheme-independent.

What would settle it

Compute the CP-odd Fano-coefficient shifts at a reference point using a different renormalization of the pseudoscalar sector, such as a momentum-dependent or MS-bar subtraction instead of the imaginary field renormalization, and check whether the dispersive shift in C^-_nr changes by more than the experimental uncertainty. If it does, the quoted bound depends on the scheme choice. Alternatively, re-run the chi-squared using only the absorptive observables P_k and Pbar_k: a dramatic loss of sensitivity would indicate that the scheme-sensitive dispersive term, rather than on-shell CP violation,

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Tomographic spin measurements become a new, largely orthogonal handle on the top-Higgs CP phase, closing directions in the coupling plane that cross-section-only fits leave open.
  • The quoted intervals are already comparable to the direct ttH and tH reach at the same Run 2 luminosity, so the method can be combined with direct searches to tighten combined constraints.
  • Rebinning the same CMS tomographic data with smaller top-pair invariant-mass bins near threshold, where the one-loop Higgs corrections are largest, should strengthen the bound without requiring new data.
  • Any new physics that alters the production density matrix, through loops or effective operators, can be constrained with the same measured tomography and covariance, without regenerating events or repeating the decay simulation.
  • The separation between absorptive and dispersive contributions means the measurement can separately probe CP violation mediated by particles that can go on shell and by purely virtual effects.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct check of the method is to fit only the absorptive channel P_k - Pbar_k: a dramatic loss of sensitivity would indicate that the scheme-sensitive dispersive term, rather than on-shell CP violation, drives the result.
  • The largest single pull, about 0.8 sigma in C^-_nr at a reference CP-violating point, suggests that a threshold-tuned binning or a future luminosity upgrade could turn this method from a bound-setting tool into a discovery channel.
  • The same public CMS record could be reanalyzed for other CP-odd operators, such as a chromo-electric dipole moment, by swapping the one-loop amplitude and rerunning the chi-squared; the authors explicitly leave this direction open.
  • The residual reflection symmetry (a_t,b_t) -> (-a_t,-b_t) means tomography alone cannot fix the sign of the CP phase; combining with observables that break this symmetry would be needed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper proposes using the full set of spin observables ('quantum tomography') of top-quark pairs produced at the LHC to constrain CP violation in the top-Yukawa coupling. The coupling is parametrized as L_{htt} = -(m_t/v) h \bar t (a_t + i b_t \gamma_5) t, and enters the ttbar production density matrix at one loop. The authors compute the complete renormalized one-loop Higgs-induced correction to gg, q qbar -> t tbar, add it to the SM density matrix from the CMS HEPData record, and compare predictions for all fifteen Fano coefficients to the CMS measurements using the full published covariance. They obtain, at a_t = 1, 95% CL intervals -1.40 < b_t < 1.23 from spin information alone and -1.01 < b_t < 1.26 from a combined fit of spin and differential m_tt information, and argue that these constraints are comparable to direct ttH/tH probes.

Significance. If the result holds, the paper establishes a genuinely new observable for top-Yukawa CP violation: the quantum state of the ttbar pair, rather than cross sections or kinematic distributions. The methodological strengths are real: the one-loop density matrix is cross-checked with two independent implementations; the CP-odd absorptive polarization asymmetry P_k - \bar P_k is scheme-independent by CPT and provides a robust channel; the fit uses the full published CMS covariance; and the framework is generalizable to other new-physics contributions. The main numerical sensitivity is modest, however — the largest pull is 0.8\sigma — and the dispersive CP-odd channel C^-_nr that carries much of the sensitivity depends on a renormalization convention whose scheme-independence is not established. The paper is therefore a promising proof of principle, but the central quantitative claim needs additional support.

major comments (2)
  1. [Appendix, 'Renormalization of the CP-odd sector', Eqs. (8)-(11)] The load-bearing dispersive CP-odd observable (C^-_nr, the largest pull at 0.8\sigma; see Results and Fig. 5) is fixed by the finite part of the imaginary field-renormalization constants Im\delta Z_{L,R}^t in Eq. (11). The authors state that the on-shell subtraction implicit in Ref. [20] is identical and that two independent implementations agree; these checks establish internal consistency but not scheme-independence. A finite chiral field redefinition, an explicit pseudoscalar mass counterterm, or an MS-bar subtraction of only the divergent part would in general change Im\delta Z_{L,R} by a finite term proportional to a_t b_t, hence change the predicted C^-_nr at the same order as the one-loop effect itself. Because the central pull is only 0.8\sigma, even a 0.2-0.3\sigma scheme-induced shift can materially change the 95% CL intervals quoted in Results and the comparison with the ATLAS
  2. [Results, Eq. (7) and Fig. 3] The chi^2 in Eq. (7) uses only the experimental covariance V, while the predicted SM baseline rho_SM is taken from the CMS HEPData record at NLO+PS. Theoretical uncertainties in the SM Fano coefficients (scale, PDF, parton-shower matching) are not propagated into V. Since the maximal pulls are at or below 0.8\sigma and the claim of complementarity to direct probes is at the same level, these theory uncertainties could be comparable to the quoted sensitivity. Please estimate their impact on the predicted Q_m, for example by repeating the fit with shifted SM baselines or by adding a theory covariance, and demonstrate that the intervals in Fig. 3 are stable.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] There are numerous formatting issues in the LaTeX source, e.g. 'thet \bar tt' in the abstract, 'with√s = 13 TeV' missing a space, and 't \bar t' rendered with stray spacing. These should be cleaned up.
  2. [Eq. (6)] The notation in Eq. (6) is slightly confusing: rho_SM is a normalized density matrix while \Delta R is an unnormalized production matrix divided by 4\sigma_SM. Please spell out the normalization convention explicitly in the text.
  3. [Fig. 5 caption] The caption says 'the stars indicate the SM point and its mirror'; in Fig. 5 the stars appear in every panel and are hard to see. Consider marking only representative panels or enlarging the star symbols.
  4. [References] Reference [13] is an arXiv preprint from 2026; if a journal version exists by publication, it should be updated. Also, the HEPData records in Refs. [28] should include the exact DOI or record identifier for reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: the one-loop Fano-coefficient shifts are genuine computed functions of (a_t,b_t); CMS HEPData supplies only the SM baseline and covariance, not the predicted shifts.

full rationale

The claimed derivation chain is: introduce the CP-violating top-Yukawa Lagrangian (Eq. 1); compute the one-loop Higgs-induced shifts to the ttbar production density matrix (Eq. 3 and Fig. 2); renormalize in the on-shell scheme (Appendix, Eqs. 8-11); combine with the CMS SM prediction to form predicted Fano coefficients (Eqs. 5-6); and compare with CMS observed Fano coefficients via the experimental covariance (Eq. 7). The parameters (a_t,b_t) are free model inputs scanned over the plane; they are not fitted to the measured Fano coefficients before producing the predicted shifts. The CMS HEPData record [28] is reused for two distinct quantities: the SM theoretical prediction rho^SM_k and the measured values Q^obs_m with covariance V. The SM prediction is an independent theory calculation (CMS NLO+NNLO+EW), not the unfolded measurement, so the comparison is not a tautology. The covariance enters only in the chi^2 likelihood, a standard statistical reuse, not a fitted-input loop. The renormalization of the CP-odd sector (imaginary Im deltaZ_L,R^t, Eq. 11) is an internal scheme choice; the paper cross-checks it against Ref. [20] and two independent implementations. Whether another on-shell scheme would shift the dispersive C^-_nr prediction is a physics/renormalization-scheme question, not a circularity, because the predicted value is not defined as the measured value. The Discussion's explicit caveat about decoupling of additional new physics is a stated assumption, not an input-output identity. No self-citation is load-bearing; the cited theory references (Refs. [17,20,25,26]) are external prior work. The paper's central claim holds independently of the data it constrains.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a conventional one-loop QFT calculation with two fitted couplings and one normalization nuisance, an explicit single-operator assumption, and a specific (argued but not proven scheme-independent) renormalization of the CP-odd two-point function. No invented entities. The main load-bearing choices are the renormalization scheme and the decoupling of other new physics.

free parameters (3)
  • a_t (scalar component of top-Yukawa coupling) = best fit 1.20 (Fano-inc), 0.35 (Fano-diff)
    The target coupling; fitted to CMS Fano coefficients via chi2, Eq. (7).
  • b_t (pseudoscalar component of top-Yukawa coupling) = best fit -0.08 (Fano-inc), 0.25 (Fano-diff); 95% CL interval at a_t=1: [-1.40,1.23] (Fano-inc), [-1.01,1.26] (Fano-diff)
    The target CP-violating coupling; fitted to CMS Fano coefficients via chi2, Eq. (7).
  • nu (overall normalization nuisance in chi2_Fano-diff) = allowed to vary, value not quoted
    Absorbs the overall normalization of the c-bin predictions (Eq. 12) so the combined fit uses only the shape of the m_ttbar distribution; a free parameter by construction.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The on-shell renormalization scheme with imaginary field-renormalization constants Im deltaZ_L,R^t proportional to a_t b_t (Eq. 11) renders the CP-odd one-loop sector finite without new counterterms, and the resulting finite dispersive CP-odd Fano shifts are physical.
    The frame in which the paper's new CP-odd dispersive sensitivity (C^-_nr) is defined. Asserted with reference to Ref. [26] and verified numerically against Ref. [20]'s implicit on-shell subtraction, but scheme-independence is not demonstrated in the preprint.
  • domain assumption Eq. (1) is the only nonstandard interaction contributing to ttbar production at one loop ('any other new physics is heavy enough to decouple').
    Explicitly stated in the Discussion. If other new physics enters the loop, the extracted (a_t,b_t) bounds are invalidated; the paper flags this.
  • domain assumption The CMS SM prediction (NLO QCD + parton shower, normalized to NNLO, with electroweak corrections only in the quoted uncertainties) is an adequate rho_SM baseline to which the one-loop shift is added.
    Used in Eq. (6). The paper subtracts its own SM point R(1,0) and substitutes the CMS SM values; a small mismatch between the two SM definitions is absorbed by the tiny size (about 0.5%) of the shift.
  • domain assumption Fano coefficients reconstructed from decay angular distributions equal the production-matrix coefficients for linear observables, so unfolding/showering steps can be skipped.
    Invoked after Eq. (3) and attributed to Ref. [27]. Standard for linear spin observables but an assumption about the CMS unfolding.
  • standard math Gaussian chi2 statistics with the published covariance define the confidence contours.
    Eq. (7) and the 68%/95% CL contours of Fig. 3 assume multivariate Gaussian likelihoods for the 15 (or 64) observables.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 10990 in / 28358 out tokens · 290664 ms · 2026-08-03T00:17:50.832119+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

LHC measurements now reconstruct all fifteen parameters of the $t\bar t$ two-qubit spin density matrix, which amounts to a full quantum tomography of the pair. We show that this data constrains CP violation in the top-Yukawa coupling. The coupling enters the density matrix at one loop and produces spin correlations that are odd under CP and do not affect the cross section. Using the first complete renormalized one-loop density matrix and the experimental covariance, we obtain complementary constraints comparable to those from direct tree-level $t\bar t H$ and $tH$ production.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.28761 by Eren Erdogan, Keping Xie, Kirtimaan A. Mohan, Marcel Yanez.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Kinematics and spin-analysis frame for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Representative one-loop Higgs-exchange diagrams for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Complementary constraints on the top-Yukawa cou [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The fifteen Fano coefficients [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Significance maps of the individual Fano coefficients for the combined [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 31 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    A. Hayrapetyanet al.(CMS), Measurements of polariza- tion and spin correlation and observation of entanglement in top quark pairs using lepton+jets events from proton- proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. D110, 112016 (2024), arXiv:2409.11067 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    Hayrapetyanet al.(CMS), Observation of quantum entanglement in top quark pair production in proton- proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV, Rept

    A. Hayrapetyanet al.(CMS), Observation of quantum entanglement in top quark pair production in proton- proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV, Rept. Prog. Phys.87, 117801 (2024), arXiv:2406.03976 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    A. J. Barr, M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini, E. Gabrielli, and L. Marzola, Quantum entanglement and Bell in- equality violation at colliders, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 139, 104134 (2024), arXiv:2402.07972 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    Hayrapetyanet al.(CMS), Observation of magic states of top quark pairs produced in proton-proton col- lisions at √s= 13 TeV, (2025)

    A. Hayrapetyanet al.(CMS), Observation of magic states of top quark pairs produced in proton-proton col- lisions at √s= 13 TeV, (2025)

    2025

  5. [5]

    C. D. White and M. J. White, Magic states of top quarks, Phys. Rev. D110, 116016 (2024), arXiv:2406.07321 [hep- ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Aoude, H

    R. Aoude, H. Banks, C. D. White, and M. J. White, Probing new physics in the top sector using quan- tum information, Phys. Rev. D113, 115066 (2026), arXiv:2505.12522 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  7. [7]

    A. D. Sakharov, Violation of CP Invariance, C asymme- try, and baryon asymmetry of the universe, Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.5, 32 (1967)

    1967

  8. [8]

    Weinberg, Larger Higgs Exchange Terms in the Neu- tron Electric Dipole Moment, Phys

    S. Weinberg, Larger Higgs Exchange Terms in the Neu- tron Electric Dipole Moment, Phys. Rev. Lett.63, 2333 (1989)

    1989

  9. [9]

    Weinberg, Unitarity Constraints on CP Nonconserva- tion in Higgs Exchange, Phys

    S. Weinberg, Unitarity Constraints on CP Nonconserva- tion in Higgs Exchange, Phys. Rev. D42, 860 (1990)

    1990

  10. [10]

    C. R. Schmidt and M. E. Peskin, A Probe of CP violation in top quark pair production at hadron supercolliders, Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 410 (1992)

    1992

  11. [11]

    de Florianet al.(LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group), Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 4

    D. de Florianet al.(LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group), Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 4. De- ciphering the Nature of the Higgs Sector, CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr.2, 1 (2017), arXiv:1610.07922 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  12. [12]

    Aadet al.(ATLAS),CPProperties of Higgs Boson In- teractions with Top Quarks in thet ¯tHandtHProcesses UsingH→γγwith the ATLAS Detector, Phys

    G. Aadet al.(ATLAS),CPProperties of Higgs Boson In- teractions with Top Quarks in thet ¯tHandtHProcesses UsingH→γγwith the ATLAS Detector, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 061802 (2020), arXiv:2004.04545 [hep-ex]. 6

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  13. [13]

    Aadet al.(ATLAS), Probing the Higgs-top Yukawa interaction in thet ¯tHandtHprocesses usingH→γγ with the ATLAS detector, (2026), arXiv:2606.04855 [hep-ex]

    G. Aadet al.(ATLAS), Probing the Higgs-top Yukawa interaction in thet ¯tHandtHprocesses usingH→γγ with the ATLAS detector, (2026), arXiv:2606.04855 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  14. [14]

    A. M. Sirunyanet al.(CMS), Measurements of t ¯tHPro- duction and the CP Structure of the Yukawa Interaction between the Higgs Boson and Top Quark in the Dipho- ton Decay Channel, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 061801 (2020), arXiv:2003.10866 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  15. [15]

    Tumasyanet al.(CMS), Search forCPviolation in ttH and tH production in multilepton channels in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV, JHEP07, 092, arXiv:2208.02686 [hep-ex]

    A. Tumasyanet al.(CMS), Search forCPviolation in ttH and tH production in multilepton channels in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV, JHEP07, 092, arXiv:2208.02686 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  16. [16]

    J. Brod, U. Haisch, and J. Zupan, Constraints on CP- violating Higgs couplings to the third generation, JHEP 11, 180, arXiv:1310.1385 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  17. [17]

    Maltoni, D

    F. Maltoni, D. Pagani, and S. Tentori, Top-quark pair production as a probe of light top-philic scalars and anomalous Higgs interactions, JHEP09, 098, arXiv:2406.06694 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  18. [18]

    Martini, R.-Q

    T. Martini, R.-Q. Pan, M. Schulze, and M. Xiao, Prob- ing the CP structure of the top quark Yukawa coupling: Loop sensitivity vs. on-shell sensitivity, Phys. Rev. D 104, 055045 (2021), arXiv:2104.04277 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  19. [19]

    Bernreuther and A

    W. Bernreuther and A. Brandenburg, Signatures of Higgs sector CP violation in top quark pair production at pro- ton proton supercolliders, Phys. Lett. B314, 104 (1993)

    1993

  20. [20]

    Bernreuther and A

    W. Bernreuther and A. Brandenburg, Tracing CP viola- tion in the production of top quark pairs by multiple TeV proton proton collisions, Phys. Rev. D49, 4481 (1994), arXiv:hep-ph/9312210

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  21. [21]

    Fano, Pairs of two-level systems, Rev

    U. Fano, Pairs of two-level systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.55, 855 (1983)

    1983

  22. [22]

    Afik and J

    Y. Afik and J. R. M. de Nova, Entanglement and quan- tum tomography with top quarks at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. Plus136, 907 (2021), arXiv:2003.02280 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  23. [23]

    Durupt, F

    V. Durupt, F. Maltoni, and O. Mattelaer, Auto- mated computation of spin-density matrices and quan- tum observables for collider physics, JHEP04, 103, arXiv:2510.17730 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  24. [24]

    Bernreuther, D

    W. Bernreuther, D. Heisler, and Z.-G. Si, A set of top quark spin correlation and polarization observables for the LHC: Standard Model predictions and new physics contributions, JHEP12, 026, arXiv:1508.05271 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  25. [25]

    Denner and S

    A. Denner and S. Dittmaier, Electroweak Radiative Cor- rections for Collider Physics, Phys. Rept.864, 1 (2020), arXiv:1912.06823 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  26. [26]

    Fontes and J

    D. Fontes and J. C. Rom˜ ao, Renormalization of the C2HDM with FeynMaster 2, JHEP06, 016, [Erratum: JHEP 12, 005 (2021)], arXiv:2103.06281 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  27. [27]

    Cheng, T

    K. Cheng, T. Han, and M. Low, Quantum tomography at colliders: With or without decays, Phys. Lett. B868, 139675 (2025), arXiv:2410.08303 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    Measurements of polarization and spin correlation and observation of en- tanglement in top quark pairs using lepton+jets events

    CMS Collaboration, HEPData record for “Measurements of polarization and spin correlation and observation of en- tanglement in top quark pairs using lepton+jets events” (2024)

    2024

  29. [29]

    Czakon, P

    M. Czakon, P. Fiedler, and A. Mitov, Total Top- Quark Pair-Production Cross Section at Hadron Collid- ers ThroughO(α 4 S), Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 252004 (2013), arXiv:1303.6254 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  30. [30]

    R. D. Ballet al.(NNPDF), Parton distributions from high-precision collider data, Eur. Phys. J. C77, 663 (2017), arXiv:1706.00428 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  31. [31]

    Hahn, Generating Feynman diagrams and amplitudes with FeynArts 3, Comput

    T. Hahn, Generating Feynman diagrams and amplitudes with FeynArts 3, Comput. Phys. Commun.140, 418 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0012260

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  32. [32]

    Hahn and M

    T. Hahn and M. Perez-Victoria, Automatized one loop calculations in four-dimensions and D-dimensions, Comput. Phys. Commun.118, 153 (1999), arXiv:hep- ph/9807565

    arXiv 1999

  33. [33]

    Alloul, N

    A. Alloul, N. D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr, and B. Fuks, FeynRules 2.0 - A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology, Comput. Phys. Commun.185, 2250 (2014), arXiv:1310.1921 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  34. [34]

    Degrande, Automatic evaluation of UV and R2 terms for beyond the Standard Model Lagrangians: a proof- of-principle, Comput

    C. Degrande, Automatic evaluation of UV and R2 terms for beyond the Standard Model Lagrangians: a proof- of-principle, Comput. Phys. Commun.197, 239 (2015), arXiv:1406.3030 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  35. [35]

    Alwall, R

    J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, H. S. Shao, T. Stelzer, P. Torrielli, and M. Zaro, The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations, JHEP07, 079, arXiv:1405.0301 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  36. [36]

    Hirschi, R

    V. Hirschi, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, M. V. Garzelli, F. Maltoni, and R. Pittau, Automation of one-loop QCD corrections, JHEP05, 044, arXiv:1103.0621 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  37. [37]

    A. M. Sirunyanet al.(CMS), Measurement of the top quark Yukawa coupling from t ¯t kinematic distributions in the lepton+jets final state in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. D100, 072007 (2019), arXiv:1907.01590 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  38. [38]

    Tumasyanet al.(CMS), Measurement of differential t¯tproduction cross sections in the full kinematic range using lepton+jets events from proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV, Phys

    A. Tumasyanet al.(CMS), Measurement of differential t¯tproduction cross sections in the full kinematic range using lepton+jets events from proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. D104, 092013 (2021), arXiv:2108.02803 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  39. [39]

    Aoude, E

    R. Aoude, E. Madge, F. Maltoni, and L. Mantani, Quantum SMEFT tomography: Top quark pair pro- duction at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D106, 055007 (2022), arXiv:2203.05619 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  40. [40]

    Maltoni, C

    F. Maltoni, C. Severi, S. Tentori, and E. Vryonidou, Quantum detection of new physics in top-quark pair pro- duction at the LHC, JHEP03, 099, arXiv:2401.08751 [hep-ph]. 7 APPENDIX Renormalization of the CP-odd sector.The one-loop Higgs-exchange correction to thet ¯tamplitude is ultravio- let divergent, and we render it finite by renormalizing the top-quar...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv