Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 42 references

Massless scalar QED with inverse-power tails in its null-infinity gauge data admits three finite, conserved subleading charges: a renormalized soft charge, a logarithmic charge fixed by the tail difference, and a new charge fixed by the tai

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review

2026-08-04 08:34 UTC pith:HO5UCB6H

load-bearing objection A careful extension of the asymptotic-symmetry program to tails; the new charge looks real, but the phase space is narrow and the symmetry is still conjectural. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2608.02368 v1 pith:HO5UCB6H submitted 2026-08-03 hep-th gr-qc

Subleading Asymptotic Charges in Massless Scalar QED

\'{E}anna \'{E}. Flanagan , Zhihan Liu This is my paper
classification hep-th gr-qc
keywords massless scalar QEDasymptotic chargeslarge gauge transformationsnull infinitysoft photon theoremlogarithmic soft theoremsspatial infinity1/u tails
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper argues that when the gauge field data at null infinity in massless scalar QED are allowed to fall off only as inverse powers of retarded time, the usual asymptotic charge tower must be enlarged, and three charges remain finite and conserved through scattering. One is the standard subleading soft charge, renormalized by subtracting a logarithmically divergent piece. The second is a logarithmic charge that equals, up to sign, the difference between the leading tail coefficients at the future and past ends of null infinity and matches the logarithmic contribution to the subleading soft photon factor. The third, newly identified charge records the average of those tail coefficients and is conjectured to be the charge of a new class of large gauge transformations that diverge linearly in retarded time. A sympathetic reader cares because, if correct, the infrared sector of the simplest charged gauge theory carries more exact conserved data than previously recognized, with direct ties to logarithmic soft theorems and memory effects.

Core claim

Within a phase space in which the scalar field has compact support on null infinity and the gauge free data have expansions 0AA(u) = sum_n 0,nA±A/u^n at early and late times, the authors derive three finite charges at first subleading order that are conserved under scattering. The standard subleading soft charge Q1 is logarithmically divergent on this larger phase space; subtracting ln Q1 log Λ produces a renormalized, conserved version. A second logarithmic charge ln Q1 equals, up to sign, the difference of the leading 1/u coefficients at the future and past boundaries of null infinity and reproduces the logarithmic part of the subleading soft photon factor for massless scalars. The third c

What carries the argument

The central machinery is a recursive 1/r and log r/r expansion of the self-dual Maxwell field strength near null infinity, which turns Maxwell's equations into a hierarchy of differential equations in retarded time. The crucial input is the assumed free-field boundary condition 1F_ru(u) + 1,lnF_ru log(u/2c_ℓ) → 0 as u → ∞, with the same constants c_ℓ as in the free theory; this fixes the integration constants of the hierarchy. The matching across spatial infinity is done in hyperbolic coordinates (ρ, τ), where the scalar decays faster than any power so Maxwell's equations become source-free, yielding the antipodal matching conditions that imply conservation. The renormalized subleading charg

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that in the interacting theory, as u → ∞, the multipole fields approach the free-field form 1F_ru(u) + 1,lnF_ru log(u/2c_ℓ) → 0 with exactly the same constants c_ℓ computed for free fields, and that the scalar decays faster than any power near spatial infinity; if either fails, the explicit charges and conservation laws change.

What would settle it

Take any explicit interacting scattering solution in which the gauge free data on past null infinity has a nonzero 1/v tail and the scalar has compact support, and compute 1F_ru(u) at late retarded times. If 1F_ru(u) + 1,lnF_ru log(u/2c_ℓ) does not tend to zero with the free-theory constant c_ℓ, or if the combination defining ln Q'1 changes between I^- and I^+, the conservation law (3.25) fails.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The standard subleading soft charge of massless scalar QED is not well defined once 1/u tails are allowed, but its divergence is entirely captured by the logarithmic charge; subtracting it yields a finite conserved charge.
  • The logarithmic charge ln Q1 is conserved and equals the difference of the leading tail coefficients; it provides a classical counterpart to the logarithmic term in the subleading soft photon theorem for massless charged scalars.
  • The newly identified charge ln Q'1, the average of the tail coefficients, is conserved on the same phase space and conjecturally belongs to a new large gauge symmetry diverging linearly in retarded time.
  • The matching conditions across spatial infinity determine which combinations of tail data pass from past to future null infinity; these are the conditions any scattering map must respect.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If ln Q'1 is indeed a conserved charge of a new asymptotic symmetry, it should have an associated soft theorem and memory effect; deriving its Ward identity or a classical kick observable would test the conjecture beyond the classical matching calculation.
  • The phase space could be enlarged further to allow polyhomogeneous tails u^{-k-1}(log u)^k; the same subtraction mechanism would then generate a whole tower of logarithmic charges, one per tail coefficient, rather than just the n=1 pair.
  • The assumption of faster-than-any-power scalar decay near spatial infinity excludes soft scalar data; allowing such data may mix scalar tails into the new charge and could modify the matching conditions, giving a concrete stress test of the construction.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies classical massless scalar QED on Minkowski spacetime. It enlarges the radiative phase space used by Campiglia and Laddha by allowing the Maxwell free data on null infinity to have inverse-power tails in retarded/advanced time, while the scalar free data are taken to have compact support in u,v. The authors introduce logarithmic terms in the large-r expansion, solve the resulting recursive hierarchy near I^+, and identify three charges at first subleading order: a renormalized version of the standard subleading soft charge Q_1, a logarithmic charge ln Q_1 equal to the difference of the leading tail coefficients at the future and past ends of null infinity, and a new charge ln Q'_1 probing the average of those tail coefficients. Using hyperbolic coordinates near spatial infinity and assuming the scalar field decays faster than any inverse power of the hyperbolic radius, the paper derives antipodal matching conditions and hence conservation laws for these charges. A conjecture is offered that ln Q'_1 is associated with a new class of large gauge transformations that diverge linearly in retarded time.

Significance. If the assumptions are granted, the paper delivers a coherent classical construction of finite, conserved charges in a phase space with inverse-power tails, generalizing the earlier no-tail framework. The treatment is detailed and internally consistent: the recursive hierarchy, the charge expressions (3.28), and the matching conditions (4.30) are explicit, and the relation to logarithmic soft-photon literature is carefully drawn. The paper is also unusually candid about its assumptions and limitations, and the conserved charges are concrete, checkable predictions for explicit scattering data. This is a useful step toward a systematic understanding of tail-sensitive and logarithmic infrared charges in gauge theory and complements recent work on gravitational tails. The main value is the explicit identification of the new charge ln Q'_1 and the associated matching structure.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 3, Eq. (3.8) and surrounding text] The paper assumes that the interacting theory obeys the free-field boundary condition (3.8) with the same constants c_ell from (3.9), and this is used to integrate the hierarchy (3.2) for n=1. The assumption is load-bearing: the explicit charge expressions (3.28) and the matching conditions (3.26) depend on it. The heuristic motivation that interactions are unimportant near i^+ is not a derivation. Compact support of the scalar free data (2.14b) does not by itself imply that Phi vanishes in a neighborhood of i^+; only the leading 1/r coefficient is supported in u, and higher-order coefficients in (2.10d) could carry tails. Please either prove (3.8) from the equations of motion and phase-space definition, or verify it in a nontrivial interacting solution, and state in the main theorem precisely the condition under which the charges are conserved.
  2. [Sec. 4.2, Eq. (4.8)] The faster-than-any-power scalar falloff at spatial infinity, Eq. (4.8), is assumed rather than derived from the phase-space definition (2.14). This is the step that removes the matter current from Maxwell's equations near i^0 and produces the source-free system (4.9) used for the matching. Section 5 acknowledges that this excludes soft scalar data. Since (2.14) only restricts null data, it is not obvious that every configuration in the phase space also satisfies (4.8); a solution with a 1/r Coulomb-type scalar tail would violate it. Please derive (4.8) as a consequence of (2.14), or explicitly restrict the phase space and explain whether the three charges remain conserved when soft scalar data are present.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3.2, Eq. (3.28c)] The constants a_11L and b_11L are used in the charge expression before their values are given in Sec. 4.3.1; a forward reference would help the reader.
  2. [Secs. 3-4] The notation with stacked superscripts (e.g., n,ln,m F and n,m,ln F) is very dense and hard to parse. A table of the coefficient notation or a multi-index convention would substantially improve readability.
  3. [Sec. 4.3] The step 'Comparing coefficients of powers of tau now yields (4.26)' skips several intermediate expansions. The k=1 case is shown in detail, but a sentence describing the general matching of the log-tau term would make the derivation easier to verify.
  4. [General] The paper would benefit from a concrete worked example, such as a simple soft-photon scattering configuration with explicit tail coefficients, demonstrating the finiteness of Q_1 and the conservation of all three charges. Minor typos include 'sub n-leading' in Sec. 5 and the nonstandard phrase 'the future/past boundaries I^+_- / I^-_+' in the Introduction.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: charges are defined from a stated phase space and conservation follows from independently derived matching conditions.

full rationale

The derivation chain is explicit and self-contained: (i) the phase space is fixed by stated fall-offs (2.14), with tails declared as assumptions; (ii) the large-r/log-r ansatz (3.1) is inserted into the Maxwell-scalar equations to obtain the recursive hierarchy (3.2); (iii) charges are defined as combinations of expansion coefficients in (3.21); (iv) matching conditions (3.26) are derived from a separate spatial-infinity analysis in hyperbolic coordinates (Sec. 4), including explicit solutions of the source-free Maxwell equations near i^0; (v) conservation (3.25) follows from those matching conditions and the stated antipodal identifications. The renormalization constants a,b in (3.20)/(4.29) are scheme choices, explicitly acknowledged by the paper ('the charge definitions depend on a choice of parameterization, but the manifold of charges itself does not'); they do not inject the target conservation law. The boundary condition (3.8) is announced as an assumption ('We will assume that the solutions for the interacting theory also obey the limiting behavior (3.8)'), so dependence on it is an open input, not a hidden reuse of the result. The only overlapping-author citation [30] supplies the free-field constant c_l used in that boundary condition; it is an external ingredient for a free-field computation and does not by itself force the charge-matching structure. I checked the algebraic steps: for example, conservation of ln Q'_1 is exactly the nontrivial matching condition (3.26b) combined with (3.16), not a tautology. The new charge is a constructed combination of tail data, and its conservation is the derived content of the spatial-infinity analysis. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no self-citation is used to forbid alternatives or to replace the derivation. The paper's own limitation statements (e.g., Sec. 5 on soft scalar data) are consistent with an honestly stated phase-space assumption rather than evidence of circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 5 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central derivation rests on a defined phase space with power-law tails, a gauge-fixing/evolution assumption, an assumed free-field boundary condition at late retarded time, and a strong scalar falloff at spatial infinity. The hand-chosen renormalization constants introduce scheme dependence in the subleading charge but are not fitted to data. The only new entity is the conjectured divergent large gauge transformation, which currently has no independent evidence.

free parameters (2)
  • Renormalization constants a_nmL, b_nmL = a_11L = H_L - H_1/2 + 1/(L+1), b_11L = H_1/2 - H_{L-1} + log 2 (Eq. (4.29))
    Hand-chosen to make matching conditions (3.26) hold with simple coefficients; define the renormalization scheme of Q_n and enter charge expressions (3.28c).
  • log-Lambda renormalization scale Lambda_0 = arbitrary (scheme parameter)
    The subleading charge (3.28c) depends on the choice of cutoff prescription; replacing log Λ by log(Λ/Λ_0) shifts Q_1 by log Λ_0 times ln Q_1, as the paper notes. This is a scheme choice, not a prediction.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Free data on I^+ admit power-law tails (2.14) and large-r expansion (2.10)/(3.1) with log terms; scalar data compact support (2.14b).
    Defines the phase space F; the paper explicitly says these fall-off conditions are assumptions, not consequences of the field equations (Sec. 2.2).
  • domain assumption Gauge conditions (2.11) can be imposed and the free data (2.12) determine the full solution up to gauge.
    Standard gauge-fixing and evolution in Minkowski; used throughout to reduce the phase space to (0A_A, 1φ).
  • ad hoc to paper Interacting solutions obey the free-field boundary condition (3.8) at u→∞ with the same c_ℓ from Eq. (3.9).
    Stated as an assumption immediately after Eq. (3.8); load-bearing for integrating the hierarchy (3.2) and for the u→∞ values of the tail coefficients. Not derived.
  • domain assumption Scalar field decays faster than any inverse power of ρ at spatial infinity (4.8).
    Ensures Maxwell is source-free near i^0 so matching uses the free theory; explicitly excludes soft scalar data (Sec. 4.2 and Sec. 5).
  • standard math Antipodal identification of gauge parameters (3.16) and parity properties of spherical harmonics.
    Standard matching condition for large gauge transformations; used to convert matching of field coefficients into charge conservation (3.25).
invented entities (1)
  • New class of large gauge transformations diverging linearly in retarded time no independent evidence
    purpose: Conjectured symmetry that would generate the new charge ln Q'_1
    No explicit transformation ϵ(u,xhat) ∼ u λ(xhat) is constructed, and no independent check (e.g., Ward identity) is given; paper labels it a conjecture (Abstract and Sec. 3.2).

reviewed 2026-08-04 · how reviews work

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study subleading asymptotic charges of a U(1) gauge field coupled to a charged massless scalar field in Minkowski spacetime. We consider a phase space for which the scalar-field initial data on null infinity have compact support, while the gauge-field initial data admit an asymptotic expansion with inverse-power tails in retarded (advanced) time, which we refer to as initial-data tails. We identify three finite charges at the null infinities which are conserved under scattering. One is a renormalized version of the standard subleading soft charge. The second is a logarithmic charge which is the difference of the coefficients of the leading order tails at the future and past ends of null infinity. The third is a new charge that probes the average of the tail coefficients. We conjecture that the third charge is associated with a new class of large gauge transformations which diverge linearly in retarded time.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 31 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Strominger,Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory

    A. Strominger,Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory. Princeton University Press, 2018.arXiv:1703.05448 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  2. [2]

    Gravitational waves in general relativity. 7. Waves from axisymmetric isolated systems,

    H. Bondi, M. G. J. van der Burg, and A. W. K. Metzner, “Gravitational waves in general relativity. 7. Waves from axisymmetric isolated systems,”Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A269(1962) 21–52

    1962

  3. [3]

    Gravitational waves in general relativity. 8. Waves in asymptotically flat space-times,

    R. K. Sachs, “Gravitational waves in general relativity. 8. Waves in asymptotically flat space-times,”Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A270(1962) 103–126

    1962

  4. [4]

    Gravitational Memory, BMS Supertranslations and Soft Theorems,

    A. Strominger and A. Zhiboedov, “Gravitational Memory, BMS Supertranslations and Soft Theorems,”JHEP01(2016) 086,arXiv:1411.5745 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  5. [5]

    BMS supertranslations and Weinberg’s soft graviton theorem,

    T. He, V. Lysov, P. Mitra, and A. Strominger, “BMS supertranslations and Weinberg’s soft graviton theorem,”JHEP05(2015) 151,arXiv:1401.7026 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  6. [6]

    New Symmetries of Massless QED,

    T. He, P. Mitra, A. P. Porfyriadis, and A. Strominger, “New Symmetries of Massless QED,”JHEP10(2014) 112,arXiv:1407.3789 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  7. [7]

    New Symmetries of QED,

    D. Kapec, M. Pate, and A. Strominger, “New Symmetries of QED,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.21(2017) 1769–1785,arXiv:1506.02906 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  8. [8]

    Asymptotic symmetries of qed and weinberg’s soft photon theorem,

    M. Campiglia and A. Laddha, “Asymptotic symmetries of qed and weinberg’s soft photon theorem,”JHEP07(2015) 115,arXiv:1505.05346 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  9. [9]

    Asymptotic symmetries and weinberg’s soft photon theorem,

    T. He and P. Mitra, “Asymptotic symmetries and weinberg’s soft photon theorem,” JHEP10(2019) 213

    2019

  10. [10]

    w 1`8 Algebra and the Celestial Sphere: Infinite Towers of Soft Graviton, Photon, and Gluon Symmetries,

    A. Strominger, “w 1`8 Algebra and the Celestial Sphere: Infinite Towers of Soft Graviton, Photon, and Gluon Symmetries,”Phys. Rev. Lett.127no. 22, (2021) 221601,arXiv:2105.14346 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  11. [11]

    Asymptotic charges in massless QED revisited: A view from Spatial Infinity,

    M. Campiglia and A. Laddha, “Asymptotic charges in massless QED revisited: A view from Spatial Infinity,”JHEP05(2019) 207,arXiv:1810.04619 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  12. [12]

    Infinite-dimensional hierarchy of recursive extensions for all sub n-leading soft effects in Yang-Mills,

    S. Nagy, J. Peraza, and G. Pizzolo, “Infinite-dimensional hierarchy of recursive extensions for all sub n-leading soft effects in Yang-Mills,”JHEP12(2024) 068, arXiv:2407.13556 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  13. [13]

    Infrared photons and gravitons,

    S. Weinberg, “Infrared photons and gravitons,”Phys. Rev.140(1965) B516–B524

    1965

  14. [14]

    Bremsstrahlung of very low-energy quanta in elementary particle collisions,

    F. E. Low, “Bremsstrahlung of very low-energy quanta in elementary particle collisions,”Phys. Rev.110(1958) 974–977

    1958

  15. [15]

    Low’s Subleading Soft Theorem as a Symmetry of QED,

    V. Lysov, S. Pasterski, and A. Strominger, “Low’s Subleading Soft Theorem as a Symmetry of QED,”Phys. Rev. Lett.113no. 11, (2014) 111601,arXiv:1407.3814 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  16. [16]

    Evidence for a New Soft Graviton Theorem,

    F. Cachazo and A. Strominger, “Evidence for a New Soft Graviton Theorem,” arXiv:1404.4091 [hep-th]. – 25 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  17. [17]

    Logarithmic Terms in the Soft Expansion in Four Dimensions,

    A. Laddha and A. Sen, “Logarithmic Terms in the Soft Expansion in Four Dimensions,”JHEP10(2018) 056,arXiv:1804.09193 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  18. [18]

    Classical and Quantum Results on Logarithmic Terms in the Soft Theorem in Four Dimensions,

    B. Sahoo and A. Sen, “Classical and Quantum Results on Logarithmic Terms in the Soft Theorem in Four Dimensions,”JHEP02(2019) 086,arXiv:1808.03288 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  19. [19]

    Loop Corrected Soft Photon Theorem as a Ward Identity,

    M. Campiglia and A. Laddha, “Loop Corrected Soft Photon Theorem as a Ward Identity,”JHEP10(2019) 287,arXiv:1903.09133 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  20. [20]

    Asymptotic Symmetries for Logarithmic Soft Theorems in Gauge Theory and Gravity,

    S. Choi, A. Laddha, and A. Puhm, “Asymptotic Symmetries for Logarithmic Soft Theorems in Gauge Theory and Gravity,”arXiv:2403.13053 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  21. [21]

    On BMS Invariance of Gravitational Scattering,

    A. Strominger, “On BMS Invariance of Gravitational Scattering,”JHEP07(2014) 152,arXiv:1312.2229 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  22. [22]

    Semiclassical Virasoro Symmetry of the Quantum Gravity S-Matrix,

    D. Kapec, V. Lysov, S. Pasterski, and A. Strominger, “Semiclassical Virasoro Symmetry of the Quantum Gravity S-Matrix,”JHEP08(2014) 058, arXiv:1406.3312 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  23. [23]

    Asymptotic Symmetries and Subleading Soft Graviton Theorem,

    M. Campiglia and A. Laddha, “Asymptotic Symmetries and Subleading Soft Graviton Theorem,”Phys. Rev. D90no. 12, (2014) 124028,arXiv:1408.2228 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  24. [24]

    Subleading soft photons and large gauge transformations,

    M. Campiglia and A. Laddha, “Subleading soft photons and large gauge transformations,”JHEP11(2016) 012,arXiv:1605.09677 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  25. [25]

    AsymptoticUp1qcharges at spatial infinity,

    M. Campiglia and R. Eyheralde, “AsymptoticUp1qcharges at spatial infinity,” JHEP11(2017) 168,arXiv:1703.07884 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  26. [26]

    Asymptotic Symmetries of Electromagnetism at Spatial Infinity,

    M. Henneaux and C. Troessaert, “Asymptotic Symmetries of Electromagnetism at Spatial Infinity,”JHEP05(2018) 137,arXiv:1803.10194 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  27. [27]

    Electromagnetic multipole expansions and the logarithmic soft photon theorem,

    G. Comp` ere, D. Fontaine, and K. Nguyen, “Electromagnetic multipole expansions and the logarithmic soft photon theorem,”arXiv:2503.23937 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  28. [28]

    The classical super-phaserotation infrared triangle. Classical logarithmic soft theorem as conservation law in (scalar) QED,

    S. Choi, A. Laddha, and A. Puhm, “The classical super-phaserotation infrared triangle. Classical logarithmic soft theorem as conservation law in (scalar) QED,” JHEP05(2025) 155,arXiv:2412.16149 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Asymptotic behavior of massless fields and the memory effect,

    G. Satishchandran and R. M. Wald, “Asymptotic behavior of massless fields and the memory effect,”Phys. Rev. D99no. 8, (2019) 084007,arXiv:1901.05942 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  30. [30]

    The classical dynamics of gauge theories in the deep infrared,

    E. E. Flanagan and I. Shehzad, “The classical dynamics of gauge theories in the deep infrared,”arXiv:2210.11585 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [31]

    A proof of conservation laws in gravitational scattering: tails and breaking of peeling,

    G. Comp` ere and S. Robert, “A proof of conservation laws in gravitational scattering: tails and breaking of peeling,”arXiv:2603.08705 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [32]

    Peeling-violating coefficients in classical gravitational scattering,

    G. Boschetti and M. Campiglia, “Peeling-violating coefficients in classical gravitational scattering,”Phys. Rev. D113no. 10, (2026) 104064, arXiv:2603.22681 [gr-qc]. – 26 –

    arXiv 2026

  33. [33]

    Conservation law of super-Lorentz charges,

    G. Comp` ere and S. Robert, “Conservation law of super-Lorentz charges,” arXiv:2606.26848 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  34. [34]

    Remarks on asymptotic symmetries and the subleading soft photon theorem,

    E. Conde and P. Mao, “Remarks on asymptotic symmetries and the subleading soft photon theorem,”Phys. Rev. D95no. 2, (2017) 021701,arXiv:1605.09731 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  35. [35]

    N. M. J. Woodhouse,Geometric quantization. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2 ed., 1992

    1992

  36. [36]

    Scalar, vector and tensor fields ondS 3 with arbitrary sources: harmonic analysis and antipodal maps,

    G. Comp` ere and S. Robert, “Scalar, vector and tensor fields ondS 3 with arbitrary sources: harmonic analysis and antipodal maps,”arXiv:2512.15578 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  37. [37]

    Charge and antipodal matching across spatial infinity,

    F. Capone, K. Nguyen, and E. Parisini, “Charge and antipodal matching across spatial infinity,”SciPost Phys.14no. 2, (2023) 014,arXiv:2204.06571 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  38. [38]

    Logarithmic soft graviton theorems from superrotation Ward identities,

    S. Agrawal, L. Donnay, K. Nguyen, and R. Ruzziconi, “Logarithmic soft graviton theorems from superrotation Ward identities,”JHEP02(2024) 120, arXiv:2309.11220 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    Universality of loop corrected soft theorems in 4d,

    H. Krishna and B. Sahoo, “Universality of loop corrected soft theorems in 4d,” JHEP11(2023) 233,arXiv:2308.16807 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  40. [40]

    All order classical electromagnetic soft theorems,

    D. Karan, B. Khatun, B. Sahoo, and A. Sen, “All order classical electromagnetic soft theorems,”JHEP11(2025) 025,arXiv:2501.07328 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    All loop soft photon theorems and higher spin currents on the celestial sphere,

    S. Banerjee, R. Mandal, and B. Sahoo, “All loop soft photon theorems and higher spin currents on the celestial sphere,”arXiv:2601.03361 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  42. [42]

    Matching conditions at null infinity in the presence of logarithms: the role of advanced and retarded radiation,

    M. Brice˜ no, H. A. Gonz´ alez, M. Henneaux, and A. P´ erez, “Matching conditions at null infinity in the presence of logarithms: the role of advanced and retarded radiation,”JHEP02(2026) 103,arXiv:2510.21072 [hep-th]. – 27 –

    arXiv 2026

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 4, 2026.