REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 54 references
Fibonacci number systems and the localization criterion in the many-body Aubry-Andr\'e model
T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read The paper claims that in the non-interacting many-body Aubry-André model, a filling is localized for every potential strength exactly when its density has a finite base-$\phi$ expansion, and every other filling undergoes a metal-insulator…
desk verdict A genuinely new number-theoretic framing for the many-body Aubry-André localization diagram, but the central criterion is asserted from a single density and needs much more support before it can be trusted. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The central object is the fractional Fibonacci number system. For a density $\rho=N/L$ with $L=F_n$, decompose the numerator $N$ into a sum of distinct, non-consecutive Fibonacci numbers $F_2,\dots,F_{n-1}$ (the Zeckendorf decomposition), then divide by $F_n$; the resulting expression $\rho=\sum_j a_j F_j/F_n$ gives the fractional-Fibonacci digits $a_j$. The system interpolates between the integer Fibonacci (Zeckendorf) representation and the base-$\phi$ representation, because $F_{j+m}/F_{n+m}\to\phi^{j-n}$ as $m\to\infty$, so the digits shift past the radix point and the expansion becomes $\rho=\sum_{j=1}^\infty b_j\phi^{-j}$. The localization criterion is read directly from these digits: a stable finite digit sequence under increasing $n$ means the filling is always localized, while a digit sequence that keeps acquiring new entries signals a metal-insulator transition at $W=2t$. The digits obey the no-consecutive-ones constraint, which gives the expansion its self-similar structure.
What would settle it
Take a filling with a finite but non-ratio base-$\phi$ expansion, such as $\rho=\phi^{-2}+\phi^{-5}$, approximate it by $N/L$ with $L=F_n$, and compute the size-scaling exponent of the polarization variance for $W/t<2$. The paper's criterion predicts a zero exponent (localized for all $W$); observing the metallic size scaling with exponent one and a transition at $W=2t$ would falsify the generalization beyond the three examples.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
For a system of size $L=F_n$ and particle number $N$, write the density as $\rho=N/L$ in the fractional Fibonacci system: decompose $N$ into a sum of non-consecutive Fibonacci numbers (Zeckendorf), then divide each term by $F_n$, producing digits $a_j$ in $\rho=\sum_{j=2}^{n-1}a_j F_j/F_n$. The paper's central claim is that if this digit sequence is invariant as $n$ grows, the ground state is localized for every finite potential strength, with a vanishing size-scaling exponent of the polarization variance; if new digits keep appearing, the system is metallic for $W/t<2$ and insulating for $W/t>2$, with a transition at $W=2t$. In the thermodynamic limit, because $F_{j+m}/F_{n+m}\to \phi^{j-n}$, the expansion becomes $\rho=\sum_{j=1}^\infty b_j\phi^{-j}$ in base-$\phi$. There the claim is that densities with finite base-$\phi$ expansions—those arising as limits of Fibonacci ratios and finite sums of such terms—are always localized, while all other densities, rational or irrational, transition at $W=2t$. Three numerical examples are presented: $\rho=1/2$ and $\rho=1/\sqrt{3}$ show size dependence below $W=2t$, while $\rho=F_{n-1}/F_n\to 1/\phi$ does not. The paper also shows that densities $\gamma_\pm=(F_{n-1}\pm 1)/F_n$, which approach $1/\phi$ from above and below, do show a $W=2t$ transition, so the thermodynamic-limit phase can depend on the direction from which the filling is approached.
Load-bearing premise
The load-bearing premise is that the three numerical examples shown are representative of all densities: the paper asserts the results are general, but it gives no derivation from the Hamiltonian and no systematic scan along the filling axis.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- For finite Fibonacci-sized systems, fillings whose fractional-Fibonacci digits are unchanged as $L=F_n$ grows are localized at every finite $W$; no size-scaling transition occurs.
- In the thermodynamic limit, the always-localized fillings are exactly those with finite base-$\phi$ expansions, i.e. limits of Fibonacci ratios and finite sums of their digits; all rational fillings and all other irrational fillings transition at $W=2t$.
- Approaching the localized filling $1/\phi$ with one extra or one missing particle ($\gamma_\pm$) restores a $W=2t$ transition, so the infinite-size phase diagram can depend on how the thermodynamic limit is taken.
- The fractional Fibonacci representation supplies a parameter-free finite-size criterion: localization can be predicted from the Zeckendorf table of $N$ alone, without diagonalizing the Hamiltonian.
Reading between the lines
- If the criterion is general, it implies the filling axis is intermingled at every scale: any density can be approximated arbitrarily well by a finite base-$\phi$ truncation, so an always-localized filling lies arbitrarily close to a metallic one. This fractal-in-filling structure is not drawn explicitly in the paper.
- A direct numerical test would scan many densities with short base-$\phi$ expansions (e.g. sums of two or three $\phi^{-j}$ terms) and check that the variance size-scaling exponent is zero for all $W/t$; the paper only shows three examples.
- The same interpolation between an integer Zeckendorf system and an irrational-base system may generalize to other quadratic-irrational modulations, such as silver-ratio potentials, where an analogous recurrence-based numeration would predict the anomalous fillings without fitting parameters.
Signed reviews
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. This paper proposes a 'fractional Fibonacci number system' that represents fractions of the form N/F_n by writing N in the Zeckendorf representation and shifting its digits relative to the denominator F_n. The author shows that as n→∞ the fractional Fibonacci representations converge to base-φ expansions and proves several supporting number-theoretic statements in the appendix. The physical claim is a localization criterion for the non-interacting many-body Aubry-André model: for system size L=F_n, a density whose fractional Fibonacci representation is invariant as n increases is localized at all finite potential strengths W, while all other densities show a metal-insulator transition at W=2t. In the thermodynamic limit the paper claims that densities with finite base-φ expansions are always localized and all other densities transition at W=2t, with the caveat that the limit can depend on the approximating sequence. The numerical support consists of three densities (ρ=1/2, ρ=F_{n-1}/F_n, ρ=1/√3) and two additional sequences γ_± approaching the golden-ratio density from above and below.
Significance. If the proposed classification were established, it would provide a compact number-theoretic characterization of the localization transition in a canonical quasiperiodic model, connecting Zeckendorf and base-φ representations to finite-size scaling and many-body localization. The fractional Fibonacci number system itself is a genuine construction, the limit Eq. (13) is proved correctly, and the paper is commendably explicit about the sequence-dependence of the thermodynamic limit through the γ_± example. The deficit is that the physical criterion is asserted from three numerical examples and a single member of the 'always localized' class; the claimed generality is not demonstrated either numerically or analytically. The paper therefore has real potential but as written does not yet support its central universal claim.
major comments (3)
- [Model and three numerical example calculations; Table I] The central classification is asserted rather than established. The only density in the 'always localized' class that is actually computed is ρ = F_{n-1}/F_n, whose fractional Fibonacci representation is the single digit 0.1_{F_n}. No numerical example with a multi-digit finite base-φ expansion, such as 0.101_φ or 0.1001_φ, is presented, and no derivation from the Hamiltonian is given. The sentence 'These are example calculations, but the results were found to be general' is a bare assertion. Please provide either a systematic numerical scan over many densities and system sizes or an analytic argument (for instance, linking finite base-φ expansions to the gap-labeling of the almost Mathieu operator) before the universality claim can be regarded as supported.
- [The thermodynamic limit; Eq. (22); Fig. 2] As stated, the thermodynamic-limit criterion is not well-defined. The sequences γ_+ and γ_- both converge, as real numbers, to the same density 0.1_φ, yet both show a clear transition at W=2t in Fig. 2, in contrast to the sequence F_{n-1}/F_n. Hence localization behavior is not a function of the limiting base-φ expansion alone; it depends on the sequence of finite-system representations. The discussion acknowledges this dependence for γ_±, but the abstract and introduction claim that the criterion 'remains' in the thermodynamic limit, which is at least misleading. Please reformulate the thermodynamic-limit claim with an explicit quantifier over approximating sequences, or prove that the criterion applies to a distinguished class of sequences.
- [Appendix; proof of Eq. (25)] The proof that every real number has a base-φ expansion is incomplete for irrational numbers: the greedy algorithm described ('continue until we obtain zero') terminates only for numbers with finite expansions. For an irrational R one must instead define the infinite series, prove its convergence, and show that the no-consecutive-ones condition is preserved in the limit. This is standard and fixable, but as written the appendix does not prove Eq. (25) in the claimed generality.
minor comments (5)
- [Throughout] There are several typographical errors: 'Zeckedorf' should be 'Zeckendorf', 'Not that lim' should be 'Note that lim', 'Regardig' should be 'Regarding', 'sytem' should be 'system', and 'effect' should be 'effect'.
- [The thermodynamic limit] The base-φ expansions in this section and in Table I omit the overline for repeating digits: ρ=1/2 is 0.\overline{010}_φ, not 0.010_φ, and γ_- is 0.\overline{01}_φ, not 0.01_φ, which as written equals φ^{-2}≈0.3819 and not 1/φ. The notation should be corrected because the argument that γ_- converges to the same number as γ rests on this identification.
- [The thermodynamic limit] The enumeration of densities for L=5 contains a duplicate: the list should be 0.0001, 0.001, 0.01, 0.101 for the four densities, and the subscripts should refer to F_5 rather than F_4 if the system size is 5.
- [Fibonacci number system, fractional Fibonacci number system, and base-φ numbers; Eq. (11)] Equation (11) is written as an infinite sum even though for finite M only finitely many coefficients c_j are nonzero. State explicitly that the sum is finite for fixed M, with the infinite form intended only for the n→∞ limit.
- [The thermodynamic limit; Eq. (22)] The symbols γ_+ and γ_- are defined as limits in Eq. (22) but are then used for finite-n values. Introduce explicit finite-n notation such as γ_+^{(n)} and γ_-^{(n)} to distinguish the sequence members from their limits.
Circularity Check
No circularity: the fractional Fibonacci representation is defined arithmetically, and the localization criterion is an empirical generalization, not a fitted or definitional reduction; the only self-citation is corroborated by an external reference.
full rationale
The fractional Fibonacci number system is defined purely arithmetically from the Zeckendorf decomposition of the numerator N divided by a Fibonacci denominator F_n (Eqs. 9-12), with no reference to the Hamiltonian or to localization data. The localization behavior in Figs. 1 and 2 comes from explicit diagonalization of Hamiltonian (1) and the variance formula (5); no parameter is fitted to the representation, and the 'always localized' class is not defined in terms of the computed M2. The sentence 'These are example calculations, but the results were found to be general' is an inductive extrapolation rather than a definitional reduction, and the paper itself identifies the non-uniqueness of the thermodynamic limit through gamma_+ and gamma_-. The only self-citation, to Ref. [44], appears alongside the independent external Ref. [41] for the previously reported density dependence ('As it was found in Refs. [41, 44] densities consisting of numerators with a finite number of terms exhibit only an insulating phase'), so it is not load-bearing in isolation. The main weaknesses—absence of a derivation from the Hamiltonian, lack of systematic tests for multi-digit finite base-phi expansions, and the limit-dependence of the thermodynamic classification—are scientific validity concerns rather than circular reductions. Therefore no formal circular step is present in the derivation chain.
Assumptions & free parameters
assumptions (4)
- domain assumption The thermodynamic limit of the AAM is obtained by letting n→∞ with α = F_{n+1}/F_n and L = F_n.
- domain assumption The variance M2 (or its scaling exponent) is a valid diagnostic for localization.
- ad hoc to paper Densities whose fractional Fibonacci representation is invariant under increasing n are always localized; all other densities show a transition at W=2t.
- standard math The base-phi expansion in the thermodynamic limit is obtained by the limit F_j/F_n → φ^{j-n}.
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Fibonacci number systems and the localization criterion in the many-body Aubry-Andr\'e model." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HBQHBBOY
@misc{pith2026260803458,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Fibonacci number systems and the localization criterion in the many-body Aubry-Andr\'e model},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HBQHBBOY}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.03458}
}
abstract
We introduce an extension of the Fibonacci number system, we call the fractional Fibonacci number system, which interpolates between the Fibonacci number system (used for natural numbers) and the irrational base-$\phi$ number system, which can be used to represent real numbers. The number system finds its use in interpreting the localization phase diagram of the many-body non-interacting Aubry-Andr\'e model. For finite system sizes a localization criterion can be obtained if the particle density is written in the fractional Fibonacci number system. In the thermodynamic limit, the criterion remains, but in this case the particle density is expressed in base-$\phi$. The nature of the thermodynamic limit is also discussed.
Figures
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
E. Abrahams, P. W. Anderson, D. C. Licciardello, and T. V. Ramakrishnan, ”Scaling Theory of Localization: Ab- sence of Quantum Diffusion in Two Dimensions” Phys. Rev. Lett. 42 673 (1979)
work page 1979
-
[2]
Langedijk, B
A. Langedijk, B. van Tiggelen, and D. S. Wiersma, ”Fifty years of Anderson localization” Physics Today 62 24 (2009)
2009
-
[3]
Evers and A
F. Evers and A. D. Mirlin, ”Anderson transitions” Rev. Mod. Phys. 80 1355 (2008)
2008
-
[4]
S. Aubry and G. Andr´ e, ”Analyticity breaking and An- derson localization in incommensurate lattices.” Ann. Isr. Phys. Soc. 3 133 (1980)
work page 1980
-
[5]
A. J. Martinez, M. A. Porter, and P. T. Kevrekidis, ”Quasiperiodic granular chains and Hofstadter butter- flies” Philos. Trans. A 376 20170139 (2018)
work page 2018
-
[6]
G. A. Dominguez-Castro, R. Paredes, ”The Aubry–Andr´ e model as a hobbyhorse for under- standing the localization phenomenon”, Eur. J. Phys. 40 045403 (2019)
work page 2019
-
[7]
P. G. Harper, ”Single Band Motion of Conduction Elec- trons in a Uniform Magnetic Field” Proc. Phys. Soc. A 68 874 (1955)
work page 1955
-
[8]
K. von Klitzing, G. Dorda, and M. Pepper, ”New Method for High-Accuracy Determination of the Fine-Structure Constant Based on Quantized Hall Resistance” Phys. Rev. Lett. 45 494 (1980)
work page 1980
Show all 54 references
-
[9]
Similarly, when the limit n → ∞ is taken, γ = γ+ = γ−
These two numbers are equal. Similarly, when the limit n → ∞ is taken, γ = γ+ = γ−. Defining an interval between γ+ and γ− is finite for finite n, but zooms in on γ as n tends to infinity. Calculations for γ+ and γ− are shown in Fig. 2 for three system sizes each. In contrast to γ...
2017
-
[10]
D. C. Tsui, H. L. Stormer, and A. C. Gossard, ”Two- Dimensional Magnetotransport in the Extreme Quantum Limit”Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 1559 (1982)
1982
-
[11]
D. J. Thouless, M. Kohmoto, M. P. Nightingale, M. den Nijs, ”Quantized Hall Conductance in a Two- Dimensional Periodic Potential” Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 405 (1982)
1982
-
[12]
S. Ya. Jitomirskaya, ”Metal-Insulator Transition for the Almost Mathieu Operator” Ann. Math. 150 1159 (1999)
1999
-
[13]
Avila, S
A. Avila, S. Jitomirskaya, ”Solving the Ten Martini Pro b- lem” In: J. Asch, A. Joye, (eds) Mathematical Physics of Quantum Mechanics , Lecture Notes in Physics, vol 690. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
-
[14]
Avila and S
A. Avila and S. Jitomirskaya ”The Ten Martini Problem” Ann. Math. 170 303 (2009)
2009
-
[15]
Avila, J
A. Avila, J. You, and Q. Zhou, ”Dry Ten Martini Prob- lem in the non-critical case” arxiv:2306.16254
-
[16]
Billy, V
J. Billy, V. Josse, Z. Zuo, A. Bernard, B. Hambrecht, P. Logan, D. Cl´ ement, L. Sanchez-Palencia, P. Bouyer, and A. Aspect, ”Direct observation of Anderson local- ization of matter-waves in a controlled disorder” Nature (London) 453 891 (2008)
2008
-
[17]
Roati, C
G. Roati, C. D’Errico, L. Fallani, M. Fattori, C. Fort, M. Zaccanti, G. Modugno, M. Modugno, and M. In- guscio, . ”Anderson localization of a non-interacting Bose–Einstein condensate” Nature (London) 453 895 (2008)
2008
-
[18]
Modugno, ”Exponential localization in one- dimensional quasi-periodic optical lattices” New
M. Modugno, ”Exponential localization in one- dimensional quasi-periodic optical lattices” New. J. Phys. 11 033023 (2009)
2009
-
[19]
Kohlert, S
T. Kohlert, S. Scherg, X. Li, H. P. L¨ uschen, S. Das Sarma, I. Bloch, M. Aidelsburger, ”Observation of Many- Body Localization in a One-Dimensional System with a Single-Particle Mobility Edge” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 170403 (2019)
2019
-
[20]
Johansson and R
M. Johansson and R. Riklund, ”Self-dual model for one-dimensional incommensurate crystals including next- nearest-neighbor hopping, and its relation to the Hofs- tadter model” Phys. Rev. B 43 13468 (1991)
1991
-
[21]
Biddle and S
J. Biddle and S. Das Sarma, ”Predicted Mobility Edges in One-Dimensional Incommensurate Optical Lattices: An Exactly Solvable Model of Anderson Localization” Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 070601 (2010)
2010
-
[22]
Biddle, D
J. Biddle, D. J. Priour Jr., B. Wang, and S. Das Sarma, ”Localization in one-dimensional lattices with non-nearest-neighbor hopping: Generalized Anderson and Aubry-Andr´ e models” Phys. Rev. B 83 075105 (2011)
2011
-
[23]
Ganeshan, K
S. Ganeshan, K. Sun, and S. Das Sarma, ”Topological Zero-Energy Modes in Gapless Commensurate Aubry- Andr´ e-Harper Models” Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 180403 (2013)
2013
-
[24]
Ganeshan, J
S. Ganeshan, J. H. Pixley, and S. Das Sarma, ”Nearest Neighbor Tight Binding Models with an Exact Mobility Edge in One Dimension” Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 146601 (2015)
2015
-
[25]
Bistritzer and A
R. Bistritzer and A. H. Macdonald, ”Moir´ e bands in twisted double-layer graphene”, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 108 12233 (2011)
2011
-
[26]
Monthus, ”Multifractality in the generalized Aubry - Andre quasiperiodic localization model with power-law hoppings or power-law Fourier coefficients” Fractals 27 1950007 (2017)
C. Monthus, ”Multifractality in the generalized Aubry - Andre quasiperiodic localization model with power-law hoppings or power-law Fourier coefficients” Fractals 27 1950007 (2017)
2017
-
[27]
Li and S
X. Li and S. Das Sarma, ”Mobility edge and interme- diate phase in one-dimensional incommensurate lattice potentials”, Phys. Rev. B 101 064203 (2020)
2020
-
[28]
Padhan, M
A. Padhan, M. K. Giri, S. Mondal, and T. Mishra, ”Emergence of multiple localization transitions in a one- 8 dimensional quasiperiodic lattice” Phys. Rev. B 105 L220201 (2022)
2022
-
[29]
Gon¸ calves, B
M. Gon¸ calves, B. Amorim, E. V. Castro, and P. Ribeiro, ”Critical Phase Dualities in 1D Exactly Solv- able Quasiperiodic Models” Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 186303 (2023)
2023
-
[30]
Gon¸ calves, B
M. Gon¸ calves, B. Amorim, E. V. Castro, and P. Ribeiro, ”Renormalization group theory of one-dimensional quasiperiodic lattice models with commensurate approx- imants” Phys. Rev. B 108 L100201 (2023)
2023
-
[31]
Dziurawiec, J
M. Dziurawiec, J. O. de Almeida, M. L. Bera, M. Plodzie´ n, M. M. Ma´ ska, M. Lewenstein, T. Grass, and U. Bhattacharya, ”Unraveling multifractality and mobil- ity edges in quasiperiodic Aubry-Andr´ e-Harper chains through high-harmonic generation” Phys. Rev. B 110 014209 (2024)
2024
-
[32]
R. Chi, J. J. Yu, C. Murthy, and T. Xiang, ”Luttinger liquid phase in the Aubry-Andr´ e Hubbard chain”, Phys. Rev. B 110 165117 (2024)
2024
-
[33]
Z. H. Zhang, H. C. Kou, P. Li, ”Critical dynamics and its interferometry in the one-dimensional p-wave-paired Aubry-Andr´ e-Harper model”,Phys. Rev. B 112 014310 (2025)
2025
-
[34]
Goswami, P
A. Goswami, P. Chatterjee, R. Modak, and S. Sahoo, ”Subsystem localization in a two-leg ladder system”, Phys. Rev. B 112 144205 (2025)
2025
-
[35]
F Lu, A. Zhou, S. Cheng, and G. Xianlong, ”Wigner distribution, Wigner entropy, and anomalous transport of a generalized Aubry-Andr´ e model”, Phys. Rev. B 112 174206 (2025)
2025
-
[36]
Gandhi, J
S. Gandhi, J. N. Bandyobadhyay, ”Superconducting p- wave pairing effects on one-dimensional non-Hermitian quasicrystals with power law hopping”, Phys. Rev. B 111 174210 (2025)
2025
-
[37]
Sahoo and D
A. Sahoo and D. Rakshit, ”Enhanced sensing of a weak Stark field under the influence of Aubry-Andr´ e-Harper criticality” Phys. Rev. B 113 022601 (2026)
2026
-
[38]
Zhang, ”Interaction-induced quasicrystalline ord er: Emergence of quasisolid and quasisupersolid phases”, Phys
C. Zhang, ”Interaction-induced quasicrystalline ord er: Emergence of quasisolid and quasisupersolid phases”, Phys. Rev. B 113 L220502 (2026)
2026
-
[39]
Liu, ”Dual-spaces invariance as a concise criterion for multifractal critical states”, Int
T. Liu, ”Dual-spaces invariance as a concise criterion for multifractal critical states”, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 40 2650093 (2026)
2026
-
[40]
B¨ onsel, F
F. B¨ onsel, F. K. Kunst, and F. Roccati, ”Fibonacci Waveguide Quantum Electrodynamics”, Quantum 10 2081 (2026)
2026
-
[41]
Jeon and S
J. Jeon and S. Sakai, ”Quantum hyperuniformity and quantum weight”, Phys. Rev. B 113 L241113 (2026)
2026
-
[42]
Cookmeyer, J
T. Cookmeyer, J. Motruk, J. E. Moore, ”Critical proper- ties of the ground-state localization-delocalization tra n- sition in the many-particle Aubry-Andr´ e model”, Phys. Rev. B 101174203 (2020)
2020
-
[43]
Kerala Varma and S
V. Kerala Varma and S. Pilati, ”Kohn’s localization in disordered fermionic systems with and without interac- tions” Phys. Rev. B 92 134207 (2015)
2015
-
[44]
Het´ enyi, ”Scaling of the bulk polarization in exten ded and localized phases of a quasiperiodic model” Phys
B. Het´ enyi, ”Scaling of the bulk polarization in exten ded and localized phases of a quasiperiodic model” Phys. Rev. B 110 124125 (2024)
2024
-
[45]
Het´ enyi and I
B. Het´ enyi and I. Balogh, ”Numerical study of the lo- calization transition of Aubry-Andr´ e type models” Phys. Rev. B 112 144203 (2025)
2025
-
[46]
Mastropietro, ”Localization of Interacting Fermio ns in the Aubry-Andr´ e Model”Phys
V. Mastropietro, ”Localization of Interacting Fermio ns in the Aubry-Andr´ e Model”Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 180401 (2015)
2015
-
[47]
S. Xu, X. Li, Y.-T. Hsu, B. Swingle, S. Das Sarma, ”But- terfly effect in interacting Aubry-Andre model: Thermal- ization, slow scrambling, and many-body localization”, Phys. Rev. Research 1 032039(R) (2019)
2019
-
[48]
Huang, D
K. Huang, D. Vu, S. Das Sarma, X. Li, ”Interaction- enhanced many body localization in a generalized Aubry- Andre model” Phys. Rev. Res. 6, L022054 (2024)
2024
-
[49]
Bergman, ”A Number System with an Irrational Base” Mathematics Magazine 31 98 (1957)
G. Bergman, ”A Number System with an Irrational Base” Mathematics Magazine 31 98 (1957)
1957
-
[50]
Resta, ”Quantum-Mechanical Position Operator in Extended Systems” Phys
R. Resta, ”Quantum-Mechanical Position Operator in Extended Systems” Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 1800 (1998)
1998
-
[51]
Resta and S
R. Resta and S. Sorella, ”Electron Localization in the Insulating State”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 370 (1999)
1999
-
[52]
Vajda, ”Fibonacci and Lucas Numbers, and the Golden Section: Theory and Applications”, Ellis Hor- wood Limited, Chichester, U.K., 1989
S. Vajda, ”Fibonacci and Lucas Numbers, and the Golden Section: Theory and Applications”, Ellis Hor- wood Limited, Chichester, U.K., 1989
1989
-
[53]
Zeckendorf, ”Repr´ esentation des nombres naturelspar une somme de nombres de Fibonacci ou de nombres de Lucas”, Bull
E. Zeckendorf, ”Repr´ esentation des nombres naturelspar une somme de nombres de Fibonacci ou de nombres de Lucas”, Bull. Soc. R. Sci. Li` ege 41 179 (1972)
1972
-
[54]
J. D. Samons, ”A Relationship Between the Fi- bonacci Sequence and Cantor’s Ternary Set”, UNF Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 285, (1994). (https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/etd/285)
1994
Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.