Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 63 references

Tuning the Optoelectronics of Mixed-Semiconductors through the interplay of Quantum confinement and Stoichiometry Engineering

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The smallest CsPbBr3 nanocrystals, despite the widest band gap, show the fastest hole transport and the most resistant ion migration when synthesis is precursor-engineered.

desk verdict A genuinely new size-dependent transport dataset in CsPbBr3 nanocrystals, but the headline causal claim is confounded by film thickness and precursor chemistry changing at the same time as size. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.05890 v1 pith:6PQWAJBS submitted 2026-08-06 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall

Kanha Ram Khator , Anupam Manna , Amlandeep Nayak , Pravat Nayek , Prasenjit Mal , Satyaprasad P Senanayak This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.mes-hall
keywords CsPbBr3nanocrystalsquantumconfinementholetransportionmigrationprecursorengineeringspace-charge-limitedcurrenttransientmeasurement
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the usual expectation for quantum-confined nanocrystals—that smaller crystals with wider band gaps should transport charge worse—does not hold for CsPbBr3 nanocrystals when synthesis is controlled. Across a size series from 11.3 nm to 5.6 nm, the smallest nanocrystals show the highest hole mobility ($\sim 1\times10^{-3}$ cm$^2$ V$^{-1}$ s$^{-1}$), the lowest activation energy for hole hopping (78 meV), and the highest barrier to vacancy-mediated bromide migration (370 meV). The paper attributes this to precursor chemistry: a slower-releasing bromide source yields nearly monodisperse, bromide-rich, defect-suppressed nanocrystals whose wavefunctions overlap well in films. If true, strong quantum confinement and good stoichiometry can be combined to make perovskite nanocrystal solids that conduct holes faster and resist ion migration better, which matters for LEDs, detectors, and other quantum-confined devices.

What carries the argument

The central object is a three-way series of CsPbBr3 nanocrystal films made by hot injection with different bromide precursors: p-CsPbBr3 (PbBr2, 11.3 nm), d-CsPbBr3 (dibromoisocyanuric acid, 8.3 nm), and t-CsPbBr3 (tribromoisocyanuric acid, 5.6 nm). The argument runs on two measurements: time-of-flight-style transient current, whose Arrhenius time constant yields the ionic activation energy for vacancy-mediated Br$^-$ migration, and space-charge-limited current (Mott-Gurney law, $J = (9/8)\epsilon_0 \epsilon_r \mu_h V^2/L^3$), which yields the hole mobility and hole activation energy. The mechanistic bridge is precursor chemistry: the less soluble tribromoisocyanuric acid slows nucleation, giving monodisperse (about 7% dispersion), bromide-rich (Cs:Pb:Br = 1:1:4.5) nanocrystals with near-unity photoluminescence yield, and the paper argues their uniform packing supports wavefunction overlap and a lower hopping barrier.

What would settle it

Measure a size series of CsPbBr3 nanocrystals made with a single bromide precursor, varying only reaction temperature, time, or quench, and repeat the SCLC and transient-current measurements; if hole mobility no longer rises as size decreases, the size-based claim collapses. Alternatively, synthesize same-size nanocrystals with different Br:Pb ratios and check whether transport tracks stoichiometry instead.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that t-CsPbBr3—the smallest nanocrystals studied (5.6 ± 0.4 nm), made with tribromoisocyanuric acid—exhibit superior hole transport and suppressed ionic motion despite stronger quantum confinement and a wider band gap. From space-charge-limited current measurements the paper extracts hole mobilities of $\sim 1\times10^{-3}$ cm$^2$ V$^{-1}$ s$^{-1}$ for the smallest nanocrystals versus $6.4\times10^{-8}$ cm$^2$ V$^{-1}$ s$^{-1}$ for the largest (11.3 ± 2.1 nm p-CsPbBr3), with hole activation energies of 78 meV versus 156 meV. From temperature-dependent transient current measurements it finds ion activation energies of 370 meV for the smallest nanocrystals versus 174 meV for the largest, meaning bromide vacancies migrate less readily in the small crystals. The paper presents these trends as the result of precursor-limited nucleation lowering halide-vacancy density and improving monodispersity, so that inter-dot electronic coupling offsets the expected confinement penalty.

Load-bearing premise

The three nanocrystal samples differ not only in size but also in bromide source, stoichiometry, size dispersion, film thickness and defect density, and the paper's size-based story assumes these recipe differences do not drive the transport trends.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Strongly confined CsPbBr3 nanocrystals can be made into films with hole mobility around $10^{-3}$ cm$^2$ V$^{-1}$ s$^{-1}$, several orders of magnitude above larger, polydisperse nanocrystal films.
  • Suppressing halide vacancies in small nanocrystals raises the ion-migration barrier to about 370 meV, which should improve device stability against electric-field-driven degradation.
  • Precursor choice becomes a transport knob: bromide-rich, slower-nucleating precursors yield both smaller size and better electronic and ionic transport.
  • Hole transport in these films remains thermally activated (78–156 meV) rather than band-like, so the improvement comes from reducing defect-related barriers rather than from delocalized conduction.
  • Device comparison needs thickness normalization: raw saturation currents disagree with mobility trends, and the paper shows that field and $L^{-3}$ scaling explain the discrepancy.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension is whether the same inverse size-transport trend appears in a size series made from one precursor by varying reaction time or temperature; if not, the size attribution weakens.
  • The results suggest electron transport may not follow the same pattern, since the devices are hole-selective; measuring electron-only devices would show whether the benefit is limited to holes.
  • If ion migration is genuinely suppressed in the smallest nanocrystals, the same films should show reduced hysteresis in field-effect transistors and longer operational lifetime under bias, which could be checked directly.
  • The stoichiometry values (bromide-rich t-CsPbBr3 versus bromide-poorer d-CsPbBr3) suggest that bromide excess, not size alone, may be the primary cause; quantifying transport versus Br/Pb ratio at constant size would separate the two.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports temperature-dependent transient current and space-charge-limited current measurements on three CsPbBr3 nanocrystal films (p-, d-, t-CsPbBr3; nominal sizes 11.3, 8.3, and 5.6 nm) synthesized with different bromine precursors. The authors claim that the smallest nanocrystals, despite stronger quantum confinement and a larger band gap, exhibit the best hole transport, with a hole mobility of about 1e-3 cm2/Vs, a hole activation energy of 78 meV, and the highest barrier for vacancy-mediated bromide migration (370 meV). These trends are attributed to a combination of quantum confinement and precursor-controlled stoichiometry that suppresses halide vacancies. The evidence consists of transient rise-time mobilities, SCLC Mott-Gurney mobilities, and Arrhenius analysis of transient current time constants and temperature-dependent J-V characteristics.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the paper would report a counterintuitive and practically important result: strongly confined perovskite nanocrystals can simultaneously offer better hole transport and reduced ion migration when defect chemistry is controlled. The paper has notable strengths: it attempts to decouple ionic and electronic transport, it provides two independent mobility estimates (transient-derived and SCLC) that agree in trend, and it reports temperature-dependent activation energies with reasonable values. However, the validity of the size-based causal claim is threatened by multiple simultaneous changes across the three samples—film thickness, precursor identity, stoichiometry, size dispersion, and defect density—so the significance of the result depends on whether these confounds can be excluded.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3, SCLC analysis (Mott-Gurney law)] The central claim of 'orders of magnitude' higher hole mobility in t-CsPbBr3 rests on SCLC mobility extracted with J = (9/8) ε0 εr μh V^2/L^3, but the three films have very different thicknesses: L = 100±16 nm (p), 423±22 nm (d), and 490±25 nm (t). Because μh scales as L^3, the apparent 10^4-fold difference between p- and t-CsPbBr3 could be dominated by the thickness difference rather than by intrinsic nanocrystal size or connectivity. The paper corrects J_sat for thickness, but it does not characterize film morphology, porosity, roughness, or density, and it does not provide a thickness-series control for any one NC type. The claim that the smallest NCs are intrinsically better hole conductors is therefore not established by the current data.
  2. [Sec. 3 and Methods (sample series)] The three samples are treated as a 'size series' in which size is the main variable, but the synthesis also changes the bromine precursor (PbBr2 vs TBIA vs DBIA), the bromide stoichiometry (Cs:Pb:Br = 1:1:4.5 and 1.08:1:3.26), the size dispersion (7% vs 18%), the film thickness, and the defect density (PLQY 75% vs 93% vs 99%). The observed transport trends are therefore not uniquely attributable to quantum confinement or nanocrystal size; the title and abstract overstate a size-based causal interpretation. The authors should either disentangle these variables with additional control experiments or explicitly frame the results as properties of specific precursor-engineered NC films rather than of size per se.
  3. [Sec. 3, transient current and ion activation energy] The ion activation energy is extracted by fitting 1/τc = K0 exp(-E_a^ion/kBT) under the assumption that a single ionic process dominates the transient rise. However, the paper does not demonstrate that the transient is single-exponential beyond quoting one time constant, and the temperature range for the t-CsPbBr3 fit is narrow because ionic motion is reported to freeze below about 260 K; the Arrhenius plot in Fig. 2i therefore rests on relatively few points. The stated E_a^ion = 370 ± 44 meV for t-CsPbBr3 should be supported by a residual analysis, the number of fitted points, and a check that a distributed barrier or two-process model does not describe the data equally well.
  4. [Sec. 3, transient time-of-flight mobility] The mobility μ_TOF = L^2/(V τ_rise) is derived from the 10%-90% rise time of a transient current in a vertical diode, rather than from a true time-of-flight measurement with a sheet of carriers traversing a known thickness. In such devices the rise time can be limited by the RC time constant, injection barriers, or ionic relaxation, and the same thickness-scaling issues apply to this L^2 dependence. The paper rules out probe capacitance but does not quantify the device RC or injection delay, so the transient-derived mobility does not provide fully independent confirmation of the SCLC trend.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. 3] The abstract reports 'hole mobility (µh) ~ 1 × 10^-3 cm2/Vs, orders of magnitude higher than the NCs with larger sizes,' but the text states values 'as high as 1 × 10^-3 cm2/Vs' for t-CsPbBr3 and '6.4 × 10^-8 cm2/Vs' for p-CsPbBr3; the 'orders of magnitude' phrasing should be accompanied by the actual range and an explicit statement of the confounded thickness difference.
  2. [Sec. 3, temperature-dependent J-V] The hole activation energy for d-CsPbBr3 is not reported in the text, although Fig. 4 presumably contains it; please provide the value and its uncertainty for all three NCs in the main text.
  3. [Sec. 3, normalization of J_sat] The correction of J_sat for thickness is described only qualitatively ('normalizing for thickness'); the exact formula used (e.g., multiplying by (L_ref/L)^3 or by a field-correction factor) should be stated so that the reader can reproduce the corrected values of 8.9, 12.7, and 13.8 mA/cm2.
  4. [References] Reference [23] is listed as 'Manuscript Under Preparation' and is used as the source for the p-CsPbBr3 size dispersion and possibly other data; if this manuscript is not publicly available, its use should be replaced by the original TEM statistics or clearly marked as personal communication.
  5. [Figures] In Figures 2 and 3, the Arrhenius fits would benefit from showing the number of data points, the temperature range used, and the fit residuals; for t-CsPbBr3, the narrow high-temperature window should be visually evident in the figure.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation: all transport parameters are measured fit outputs; the only self-citations are sample provenance and a redundant size-dispersion attribution.

full rationale

All load-bearing quantities in this paper are derived from measurements reported here, not recycled from inputs. SCLC mobility is extracted from measured J–V curves via the Mott–Gurney law (J = 9/8 ε0εr μh V^2/L^3); time-of-flight mobility is computed from the measured 10–90% rise time via μ = L^2/(V τrise); and both hole and ion activation energies are Arrhenius fit parameters of temperature-dependent data. None of these outputs is an input to the fitting, and no equation-level identity reduces a claimed result to a fitted variable. Citations to the authors’ prior synthesis work (Refs. [14] and [31]) supply sample provenance, PLQY values, and EDS composition; they do not determine the transport measurements. The size dispersion of ~7% vs ~18% is attributed to an unpublished same-group manuscript [23], but it is also directly recoverable from the sizes and standard deviations reported in this paper (0.4/5.6 ≈ 7%; 2.1/11.3 ≈ 19%), so this self-citation is redundant rather than load-bearing. The simultaneous variation of precursor identity, bromide stoichiometry, film thickness, and size dispersion across the p/d/t series is a genuine confound for the size-causality claim, but that is a validity or correctness concern, not circularity. No quotable reduction meets the circularity standard.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's quantitative claims rest on fitted activation energies and mobilities, on the assumption that the transient time constant reports ion migration, and on the comparability of the three NC samples. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (7)
  • Hole activation energy for t-CsPbBr3 = 78 ± 11 meV
    Extracted from an Arrhenius fit to temperature-dependent SCLC mobility in the high-temperature regime (roughly 200-300 K); central to the claim that the smallest NCs transport holes best.
  • Hole activation energy for p-CsPbBr3 = 156 ± 24 meV
    Fitted from the same Arrhenius analysis; used as the comparison point showing larger NCs have higher hole barriers.
  • Ion activation energy for t-CsPbBr3 = 370 ± 44 meV
    Fitted from Arrhenius dependence of 1/tau_c on temperature, over a narrow range near 260-300 K because the exponential transient disappears below the threshold.
  • Ion activation energy for d-CsPbBr3 = 262 ± 47 meV
    Fitted from the same transient-current Arrhenius analysis over a broader temperature range than for t-CsPbBr3.
  • Ion activation energy for p-CsPbBr3 = 174 ± 49 meV
    Fitted from the same transient-current Arrhenius analysis down to 100 K; the lowest ionic barrier in the series.
  • SCLC hole mobilities = 1e-3, 1.6e-5, 6.4e-8 cm2/Vs
    Derived from Mott-Gurney law with an unspecified dielectric constant; the values are fit outputs used to support the transport trend.
  • Ion freezing threshold temperatures (Tth) = 260, 160, 100 K
    Chosen by inspection as the temperature below which the exponential transient rise disappears; these choices define different fitting ranges for the three samples.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The transient response time constant tau_c is governed by a single dominant process: vacancy-mediated Br- migration modulating hole injection, with electronic transport fast by comparison.
    Invoked in Section 3 after the transient current discussion; if electronic transport or RC effects contribute significantly, the extracted Ea_ion is a mixed quantity.
  • standard math Arrhenius activated hopping applies to both hole transport and ion migration over the measured temperature ranges.
    Used to extract Ea_hole and Ea_ion from the slopes in Figures 2g-i and 3d.
  • domain assumption The Mott-Gurney law with a constant, unspecified dielectric constant applies to extract hole mobility from the J-V curves.
    Assumed in the SCLC section; trap-free conditions, ohmic injection, and a uniform dielectric constant are not independently verified.
  • ad hoc to paper The three NC samples (p-, d-, t-CsPbBr3) can be treated as a size series with comparable surface and defect chemistry except for the intended variations.
    This is the premise of the central comparison; in reality precursor identity, stoichiometry, size dispersion, and film thickness all change together.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Tuning the Optoelectronics of Mixed-Semiconductors through the interplay of Quantum confinement and Stoichiometry Engineering." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6PQWAJBS

@misc{pith2026260805890,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Tuning the Optoelectronics of Mixed-Semiconductors through the interplay of Quantum confinement and Stoichiometry Engineering},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6PQWAJBS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.05890}
}
read the original abstract

All-inorganic cesium lead bromide (CsPbBr3) nanocrystals (NCs) have established themselves as an emerging semiconductor for next-generation optoelectronic technologies due to their unique combination of properties, such as near unity photoluminescence quantum yields, narrow color pure emission, and exceptional defect tolerance. Although size-dependent optical signatures of these NCs are well reported, the complexity of mixed ionic-electronic transport remains largely unexplored. In this study, we provide a comprehensive analysis of size-dependent charge transport by decoupling ionic and electronic transport dynamics through carefully designed transient current and space charge limited current measurements. By employing NCs of different sizes ranging from 5.6 nm to 11.3 nm in thin films, we provide a comprehensive understanding of quantum confinement effects and related synthetic chemistry. Contrary to popular beliefs of quantum confinement and band gap broadening, our results demonstrate that the smallest NCs exhibit the most efficient transport characteristics, evidenced by the lowest activation energy (hole activation energy = 78 meV) for hole transport and the highest barrier for vacancy-mediated ion migration (ion activation energy = 370 meV). This work paves a way forward for perovskite-based efficient quantum devices, by demonstrating that moving into a strong quantum confinement regime, a superior charge transport can be facilitated, when supported by carefully tailored stoichiometry.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.05890 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Temperature-dependent transient current measurement for (a) p-CsPbBr3 (b) d￾CsPbBr3 (c) t-CsPbBr3 NCs. (d, e, f) Zoomed in plots highlighting the exponential rise resulting from the intermixing of ion migration and hole transport. K versus 1000/T plot for (g) p-CsPbBr3 (h) d-CsPbBr3 (i) t-CsPbBr3. Symbols are experimentally obtained time constant values, and the solid blue lines indicate the Arrhenius law fit [PITH… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Introduction Integrating NCs into thin films is a promising approach for creating new solution-processable semiconductor-based devices.[21, 54, 57] Perovskite NCs, specifically CsPbBr3 NCs, hold special attention, due to their exceptional optoelectronic properties, which can be precisely modulated, thereby opening up a plethora of applications.[19, 39, 44...

    work page

  2. [2]

    p-CsPbBr3 was synthesized using PbBr2 as the precursor for both lead and bromine source for a comparative study

    Experimental Methods: Synthesis of CsPbBr3 NCs: CsPbBr3 NCs of varying sizes were synthesized using a modified hot injection method .[37] t-CsPbBr3 and d-CsPbBr3 were synthesized using tribromoisocyanuric acid (TBIA) and dibromoisocyanuric acid (DBIA), respectively, as the bromine source, along with PbO as the lead precursor and cesium oleate as the cesiu...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Result and Discussion: Nanocrystals (NCs) of CsPbBr 3 were synthesized using the standard hot -injection method and are denoted as p-CsPbBr3. For comparative analysis, two additional variants—t-CsPbBr3 and d-CsPbBr3 were prepared utilizing a set of organo -bromide precursors , namely tribromoisocyanuric acid (T BIA) [14] and dibromoisocyanuric acid (DBIA)...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Interestingly, we observe that the smallest nanocrystal ( t-CsPbBr3) exhibit s the lowest activation energy for hole transport and the highest activation energy for ionic transport

    Mechanism: A summary of the activation energy for both hole transport and ionic defect i s provided in Figure 4 . Interestingly, we observe that the smallest nanocrystal ( t-CsPbBr3) exhibit s the lowest activation energy for hole transport and the highest activation energy for ionic transport. Similarly, the largest NC ( p-CsPbBr3), exhibits the lowest i...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Our measurements thus indicate a strong coupling of the electronic transport with ionic defect vacancies in CsPbBr3 NCs

    Conclusion: In summary, this study provides insights into the fundamental charge transport properties of different-sized NCs . Our measurements thus indicate a strong coupling of the electronic transport with ionic defect vacancies in CsPbBr3 NCs. Both of these factors are strongly affected by the precursor chemistry and the associated quantum confinement...

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Bezboruah J, Khator K R, Gayen S, Sanke D M, Mahapatra B, Sahoo A, Nayak A, Reddy C M, Senanayak S P and Zade S S 2024 Pyrazi noquinoxaline derivatives for flexible electronic devices: effect of the mechanical properties of the crystals on device durability Chemical Science 15 19000-12

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Abbas A S, Chabeda D, Weinberg D, Limmer D T, Rabani E and Paul Alivisatos A 2025 Non-monotonic size -dependent exciton radiative lifetime in CsPbBr3 nanocrystals Nature Communications 16 6401

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Abdi-Jalebi M, Dar M I, Sadhanala A, Senanayak S P , Franckevičius M, Arora N, Hu Y , Nazeeruddin M K, Zakeeruddin S M, Grätzel M and Friend R H 2016 Impact of Monovalent Cation Halide Additives on the Structural and Optoelectronic Properties of CH3NH3PbI3 Perovskite Advanced Energy Materials 6 1502472

    work page 2016

Show all 63 references
  1. [9]

    Akkerman Q A, Nguyen T P T, Boehme S C, Montanarella F, Dirin D N, Wechsler P , Beiglböck F, Rainò G, Erni R, Katan C, Even J and Kovalenko M V 2022 Controlling the nucleation and growth kinetics of lead halide perovskite quantum dots Science 377 1406-12

    2022

  2. [10]

    Ashner M N, Shulenberger K E, Krieg F, Powers E R, Kovalenko M V, Bawendi M G and Tisdale W A 2019 Size -Dependent Biexciton Spectrum in CsPbBr3 Perovskite Nanocrystals ACS Energy Letters 4 2639-45

    2019

  3. [11]

    Bera D, Qian L, Tseng T-K and Holloway P H 2010 Quantum Dots and Their Multimodal Applications: A Review Materials 3 2260-345

    2010

  4. [12]

    Cai Y , Wu Z, Huang J, Xu X, Gao Y , Li A, Lu Z, Qu Y , Huang T, Wu Z, Liu P , Shi T and Xie W 2024 Composition Engineering in CsPb1 –xGexBr3 Perovskite Light -Emitting Diodes for Stable and Efficient Performance The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 128 4321-9

    2024

  5. [13]

    Bozyigit D, Lin W M M, Yazdani N, Yarema O and Wood V 2015 A quantitative model for charge carrier transport, trapping and recombination in nanocrystal -based solar cells Nature Communications 6 6180

    2015

  6. [14]

    Brennan M C, Herr J E, Nguyen-Beck T S, Zinna J, Draguta S, Rouvimov S, Parkhill J and Kuno M 2017 Origin of the Size -Dependent Stokes Shift in CsPbBr3 Perovskite Nanocrystals Journal of the American Chemical Society 139 12201-8

    2017

  7. [15]

    Brennan M C, Kuno M and Rouvimov S 2019 Crystal Structure of Individual CsPbBr3 Perovskite Nanocubes Inorganic Chemistry 58 1555-60

    2019

  8. [16]

    Brown A A M, Vashishtha P , Hooper T J N, Ng Y F, Nutan G V, Fang Y , Giovanni D, Tey J N, Jiang L, Damodaran B, Sum T C, Pu S H, Mhaisalkar S G and Mathews N 2021 Precise Control of CsPbBr3 Perovskite Nanocrystal Growth at Room Temperature: Size Tunability and Synthetic Insig...

    2021

  9. [17]

    Butkus J, Vashishtha P , Chen K, Gallaher J K, Prasad S K K, Metin D Z, Laufersky G, Gaston N, Halpert J E and Hodgkiss J M 2017 The Evolution of Quantum Confinement in CsPbBr3 Perovskite Nanocrystals Chemistry of Materials 29 3644-52

    2017

  10. [18]

    Ghosh J, O’Neill J, Masteghin M G, Braddock I, Crean C, Dorey R, Salway H, Anaya M, Reiss J, Wolfe D and Sellin P 2023 Surfactant -Dependent Bulk Scale Mechanochemical Synthesis of CsPbBr3 Nanocrystals for Plastic Scintillator-Based X- ray Imaging ACS Applied Nano Materials 6 14980-90

    2023

  11. [19]

    Dang Z, Dhanabalan B, Castelli A, Dhall R, Bustillo K C, Marchelli D, Spirito D, Petralanda U, Shamsi J, Manna L, Krahne R and Arciniegas M P 2020 Temperature- Driven Transformation of CsPbBr3 Nanoplatelets into Mosaic Nanotiles in Solutio n through Self-Assembly Nano Letters ...

    2020

  12. [20]

    Dinda T K, Manna A, Nayek P , Mandal B and Mal P 2024 Ultrasmall CsPbBr3 Nanocrystals as a Recyclable Heterogeneous Photocatalyst in 100% E - and Anti- Markovnikov Sulfinylsulfonation of Terminal Alkynes ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 16 49411-27

    2024

  13. [21]

    Dong Q, Mendes J, Lei L, Seyitliyev D, Zhu L, He S, Gundogdu K and So F 2020 Understanding the Role of Ion Migration in the Operation of Perovskite Light-Emitting Diodes by Transient Measurements ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 12 48845-53

    2020

  14. [22]

    Forde A, Inerbaev T, Hobbie E K and Kilin D S 2019 Excited -State Dynamics of a CsPbBr3 Nanocrystal Terminated with Binary Ligands: Sparse Density of States with 13 Giant Spin –Orbit Coupling Suppresses Carrier Cooling Journal of the American Chemical Society 141 4388-97

    2019

  15. [23]

    Garai A, Behera R K and Pradhan N 2022 Facet Chemistry and the Impact of Surface Ligands on the Photoluminescence of Different Polyhedral -Shaped CsPbBr3 Perovskite Nanocrystals The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 126 16759-66

    2022

  16. [24]

    meV for p-CsPbBr3. However, at lower temperatures (100 K – 200 K) and higher electric fields (corresponding to the SCLC regime) , the transport exhibits a typical Poole -Frenkel mechanism, reflecting barrier lowering in the presence of an electric field (Figure 3d & S5) and co...

  17. [25]

    Heidrich K, Schäfer W, Schreiber M, Söchtig J, Trendel G, Treusch J, Grandke T and Stolz H J 1981 Electronic structure, photoemission spectra, and vacuum -ultraviolet optical spectra of CsPbCl3 and CsPbBr3 Physical Review B 24 5642-9

    1981

  18. [26]

    Hooper T J N, Fang Y , Brown A A M, Pu S H and White T J 2021 Structure and surface properties of size-tuneable CsPbBr3 nanocrystals Nanoscale 13 15770-80

    2021

  19. [27]

    Kagan C R, Lifshitz E, Sargent E H and Talapin D V 2016 Building devices from colloidal quantum dots Science 353 aac5523

    2016

  20. [28]

    Kazes M, Udayabhaskararao T, Dey S and Oron D 2021 Effect of Surface Ligands in Perovskite Nanocrystals: Extending in and Reaching out Accounts of Chemical Research 54 1409-18

    2021

  21. [29]

    Khator K R, Ghosh S and Senanayak S P 2026 Unlocking the Potential of Perovskite Nanocrystals in Charge Transport and polymer Doping Manuscript Under Preparation

    2026

  22. [30]

    Li J, Gong Y and Yu W W 2024 Ion migration in 3D metal halide perovskite field effect transistors Electron 2 e28

    2024

  23. [31]

    Li Z, Senanayak S P , Dai L, Kusch G, Shivanna R, Zhang Y , Pradhan D, Ye J, Huang Y-T, Sirringhaus H, Oliver R A, Greenham N C, Friend R H and Hoye R L Z 2021 Understanding the Role of Grain Boundaries on Charge -Carrier and Ion Transport in Cs2AgBiBr6 Thin Films Advanced Fun...

    2021

  24. [32]

    Lian Y , Wang Y , Yuan Y , Ren Z, Tang W, Liu Z, Xing S, Ji K, Yuan B, Yang Y , Gao Y , Zhang S, Zhou K, Zhang G, Stranks S D, Zhao B and Di D 2025 Downscaling micro - and nano-perovskite LEDs Nature 640 62-8

    2025

  25. [33]

    Liang Z, Zhao S, Xu Z, Qiao B, Song P , Gao D and Xu X 2016 Shape -Controlled Synthesis of All-Inorganic CsPbBr3 Perovskite Nanocrystals with Bright Blue Emission ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 8 28824-30

    2016

  26. [34]

    Love J A, Feuerstein M, Wolff C M, Facchetti A and Neher D 2017 Lead Halide Perovskites as Charge Generation Layers for Electron Mobility Measurement in Organic Semiconductors ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 9 42011-9

    2017

  27. [35]

    Maity P , Merdad N A, El -Demellawi J K, G utiérrez-Arzaluz L, Liu Z, Naphade R, Alshareef H N, Bakr O M and Mohammed O F 2022 Quantum Tunneling Effect in CsPbBr3 Multiple Quantum Wells Nano Letters 22 7936-43

    2022

  28. [36]

    Mandal A, Ghosh A, Senanayak S P , Friend R H and Bhattacharyya S 2021 Thickness- Attuned CsPbBr3 Nanosheets with Enhanced p-Type Field Effect Mobility The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 12 1560-6

    2021

  29. [37]

    Manna A, Dinda T K, Ghosh S and Mal P 2023 CsPbBr3 in the Activation of the C–Br Bond of CBrX3 (X = Cl, Br) under Sunlight Chemistry of Materials 35 628-37

    2023

  30. [38]

    Manna A, Nayek P and Mal P 2025 Tuning Dimensions of CsPbBr3 Nanocrystals through Pb(II) Counter Anions: A Dance of Dimensions and Product Selectivity in Visible-Light Photocatalysis ACS Energy Letters 10 1499-507

    2025

  31. [39]

    Montanarella F and Kovalenko M V 2022 Three Millennia of Nanocrystals ACS Nano 16 5085-102

    2022

  32. [40]

    Oriel E H, Shcherbak K, Cherniukh I, Dirin D N, Bodnarchuk M I, Kovalenko M V, Chen L X and Schaller R D 2025 Dependence of Exciton Spin Dynamics on Quantum Confinement Dimensionality in CsPbBr3 Nanocrystals Nano Letters 25 7403-9

    2025

  33. [41]

    Pan L, Feng Y , Kandlakunta P , Huang J and Cao L R 2020 Performance of Perovskite CsPbBr3 Single Crystal Detector for Gamma -Ray Detection IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science 67 443-9 14

    2020

  34. [42]

    Patel S K, Nayak S and Senanayak S P 2023 Impact of B-Site Cation Substitution on Ionic and Electronic Charge Transport in Metal Halide Perovskites ACS Applied Electronic Materials 5 5371-7

    2023

  35. [43]

    Paul S and Samanta A 2020 N -Bromosuccinimide as Bromide Precur sor for Direct Synthesis of Stable and Highly Luminescent Green-Emitting Perovskite Nanocrystals ACS Energy Letters 5 64-9

    2020

  36. [44]

    Pautmeier L, Richert R and Bässler H 1990 Poole-Frenkel behavior of charge transport in organic solids with off-diagonal disorder studied by Monte Carlo simulation Synthetic Metals 37 271-81

    1990

  37. [45]

    Protesescu L, Yakunin S, Bodnarchuk M I, Krieg F, Caputo R, Hendon C H, Yang R X, Walsh A and Kovalenko M V 2015 Nanocrystals of Cesium Lead Halide Perovskites (CsPbX3, X = Cl, Br, and I): Novel Optoelectronic Materials Showing Bright Emission with Wide Color Gamut Nano Letter...

    2015

  38. [46]

    Protesescu L, Yakunin S, Nazarenko O, Dirin D N and Kovalenko M V 2018 Low-Cost Synthesis of Highly Luminescent Colloidal Lead Halide Perovskite Nanoc rystals by Wet Ball Milling ACS Applied Nano Materials 1 1300-8

    2018

  39. [47]

    Rainò G, Becker M A, Bodnarchuk M I, Mahrt R F, Kovalenko M V and Stöferle T 2018 Superfluorescence from lead halide perovskite quantum dot superlattices Nature 563 671-5

    2018

  40. [48]

    Senanayak S P , Yang B, Thomas T H, Giesbrecht N, Huang W, Gann E, Nair B, Goedel K, Guha S, Moya X, McNeill C R, Docampo P , Sadhanala A, Friend R H and Sirringhaus H 2017 Understanding charge transport in lead iodide perovskite thin-film field-effect transistors Science Adva...

    2017

  41. [49]

    Sethi N M, Nayak A, Khator K R, Preeyanka N, Chakraborty D, Senanayak S P and Sarkar M 2024 Chitosan Mediated FAPbBr3 Nanocrystal Thin -Films with High Color Purity and Enhanced Hole Mobility ChemNanoMat 10 e202400355

    2024

  42. [50]

    Shamsi J, Urban A S, Imran M, De Trizio L and Manna L 2019 Metal Halide Perovskite Nanocrystals: Synthesis, Post -Synthesis Modifications, and Their Optical Properties Chemical Reviews 119 3296-348

    2019

  43. [51]

    Smock S R, Williams T J and Brutchey R L 2018 Quantifying the Thermodynamics of Ligand Binding to CsPbBr3 Quantum Dots Angewandte Chemie International Edition 57 11711-5

    2018

  44. [52]

    Stolle C J, Harvey T B and Korgel B A 2013 Nanocrystal photovoltaics: a review of recent progress Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering 2 160-7

    2013

  45. [53]

    Strandell D P , Zenatti D, Nagpal P , Ghosh A, Dirin D N, Kovalenko M V and Kambhampati P 2024 Hot Excitons Cool in Metal Halide Perovskite Nanocrystals as Fast as CdSe Nanocrystals ACS Nano 18 1054-62

    2024

  46. [54]

    Tang Y , Poonia D, van der Laan M, Timmerman D, Kinge S, Siebbeles L D A and Schall P 2022 Electronic Coupling of Highly Ordered Perovskite Nanocrystals in Supercrystals ACS Applied Energy Materials 5 5415-22

    2022

  47. [55]

    Vighnesh K, Wang S, Liu H and Rogach A L 2022 Hot-Injection Synthesis Protocol for Green-Emitting Cesium Lead Bromide Perovskite Nanocrystals ACS Nano 16 19618- 25

    2022

  48. [56]

    Weinberg D, Park Y , Limmer D T and Rabani E 2023 Size -Dependent Lattice Symmetry Breaking Determines the Exciton Fine Structure of Perovskite Nanocrystals Nano Letters 23 4997-5003

    2023

  49. [57]

    Yan H, Cao G, Wang J, Zhong C, Wang S, Qin J, Tang F, Cui M, Luo Y , Wang W, Zhu Y , Chen J, Xu R and Wang L 2025 Uncovering the modest hole mobility for the intrinsic single crystal CsPbBr3 by variable -temperature time of flight measurement Applied Physics Letters 126 122105

    2025

  50. [58]

    Yang H, Zhu H, Ma L, Luo M, Guo H, Zhou L, Sun W, Xue B and Zhang L 2025 Engineering efficient and stable CsPbBr3 perovskite nanocrystals via multi-functional molecular mediated surface strategy toward white light -emitting devices Chemical Engineering Journal 517 164332 15

    2025

  51. [59]

    Yang X, Ma L, Li L, Luo M, Wang X, Gong Q, Lu C and Zhu R 2023 Towards micro - PeLED displays Nature Reviews Materials 8 341-53

    2023

  52. [60]

    Yazdani N, Andermatt S, Yarema M, Farto V, Bani-Hashemian M H, Volk S, Lin W M M, Yarema O, Luisier M and Wood V 2020 Charge transport in semiconductors assembled from nanocrystal quantum dots Nature Communications 11 2852

    2020

  53. [61]

    Ye J, Byranvand M M, Martínez C O, Hoye R L Z, Saliba M and Polavarapu L 2021 Defect Passivation in Lead -Halide Perovskite Nanocrystals and Thin Films: Toward Efficient LEDs and Solar Cells Angewandte Chemie International Edition 60 21636-60

    2021

  54. [62]

    Zhao Q, Hazarika A, Schelhas L T, Liu J, Gaulding E A, Li G, Zhang M, Toney M F, Sercel P C and Luther J M 2020 Size -Dependent Lattice Structure and Confinement Properties in CsPbI3 Perovskite Nanocrystals: Negative Surface Energy for Stabilization ACS Energy Letters 5 238-47

    2020

  55. [63]

    (a) Input square pulse for the transient current measurement s, Inset shows the electrical circuit utilized for the measurement

    Zhou S, Zhou G, Li Y , Xu X, Hsu Y-J, Xu J, Zhao N and Lu X 2020 Understanding Charge Transport in All-Inorganic Halide Perovskite Nanocrystal Thin-Film Field Effect Transistors ACS Energy Letters 5 2614-23 16 Figures and Captions: Figure 1. (a) Input square pulse for the tran...

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.