Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 78 references

High Precision Fundamental Physics Experiments at JLab with Spin-transparent Storage Rings of Low-energy Polarized Electron Beams

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that a tabletop, all-electric spin-transparent storage ring can cancel ordinary magnetic spin precession at any beam energy, so that the electron's electric dipole moment and axion-induced spin precession accumulate and…

desk verdict Honest LOI that reuses the authors' own ring designs; the claimed eEDM reach rests on an unvalidated one-day spin coherence time and a deferred systematic budget. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.08551 v1 pith:ZD2VGNZ6 submitted 2026-08-09 nucl-ex hep-phhep-thphysics.acc-phphysics.app-ph

Vladimir Khachatryan , Riad Suleiman , Alberto Accardi , Carlos Ayerbe Gayoso , Marco Battaglieri , Devesh Bhattarai , Silviu Covrig Dusa , Yaroslav Derbenev
show 21 more authors
Forrest Friesen Joseph Grames Paul Guèye Tyler J. Hague Ching Him Leung Wenliang (Bill) Li Magno V.T. Machado Preet Mann Vasiliy Morozov Son Nguyen Michael Nycz Howard Oh Udit Raha Mario Reig Marco Schreck Nathaniel Sherrill Ye Tian Zakia Tithi Alexandre Vieira Erik Wrightson Zichen Yin
This is my paper · ORCID
classification nucl-exhep-phhep-thphysics.acc-phphysics.app-ph PACS 29.20.Dh29.27.Hj13.40.Em95.35.+d
keywords spin-transparentstorageringselectronelectricdipolemomentaxiondarkmatterMottpolarimetryspincoherencetimeFigure-8ringEDMsearchpolarizedbeams
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This Letter of Intent claims that a table-sized, all-electric 'spin-transparent' storage ring can cancel the ordinary magnetic-dipole spin precession of a polarized low-energy electron beam after every closed turn, at any beam energy, while letting spin precession from the electron electric dipole moment (eEDM) or from axion dark-matter fields accumulate. If that cancellation holds, a single 3.55 m ring operated for five years would reach a statistical sensitivity of 5.8e-30 ecm (90% C.L.) for the electron's permanent EDM, comparable to the best current molecular-ion bound, and could measure axion-induced spin precession rates as small as 0.2 nHz. The proposed apparatus is substantially smaller and cheaper than storage-ring EDM plans for protons or deuterons, and would be the first direct measurement of the electron EDM rather than an extraction from molecules. The paper also notes the same ring technology could later measure the positron EDM and may find applications in quantum computing. Because the design is proposed as a Letter of Intent, the projected sensitivities rest on parameters, most notably a one-day spin coherence time, that have not yet been demonstrated in a working prototype.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the spin-transparent (ST) storage ring: a Figure-8, all-electric ring in which the total MDM spin rotation about the vertical axis integrates to zero around the closed orbit, by the spin-echo/spin-transparency condition, even though the beam's two energy sections (γ1=1.4 and γ2=2.6) each bend the spin through large angles. The spin precession from the EDM, however, does not integrate to zero because it scales differently with energy, so it stacks turn-by-turn; this separation of MDM versus EDM accumulation is expressed in the per-turn spin rotation formula Eq. (11). The design keeps the horizontal and vertical beam optics weak-focusing (Bates arcs), uses static 5 MV/m longitudinal fields for energy recovery and an RF cavity for bunching, and relies on Mott polarimetry to read out the accumulated vertical polarization. Two counter-rotating beams plus spin and bunch reversals are the systematic-error-suppression machinery.

What would settle it

Measure the spin-coherence time directly in a prototype of the proposed 3.55 m ring: store polarized electron bunches at γ=1.4 and γ=2.6 and monitor the Mott scattering asymmetry for 24 hours. If the polarization decay time is well below 86400 s, or if a vertical polarization buildup from radial background magnetic fields appears at a level equivalent to d_e > 5.8e-30 ecm, then the projected eEDM limit does not survive.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a properly engineered closed orbit can make the spin precession from the magnetic dipole moment (MDM) vanish over one turn regardless of beam energy, a condition the authors call spin transparency, realized in a Figure-8 all-electric ring with two-energy sections (γ=1.4 and γ=2.6) connected by longitudinal electric fields. The spin rotation per turn from the eEDM is derived as Eq. (11) and is nonzero precisely because the two energy sections break the degeneracy; this rotation accumulates turn after turn and is read out with Mott polarimetry as a growing vertical polarization component. With two counter-rotating bunches and helicity reversal, time-reversal-even background rotations cancel, leaving the eEDM signal. The same transparency, with a transversely polarized beam, converts a slowly varying axion field gradient into a measurable spin precession rate, projected down to 0.2 nHz per ring after five years. These are presented as statistical projections for a concrete 3.55 m lattice with Bates-type arcs, aimed at the best existing indirect eEDM limit of 4.1e-30 ecm.

Load-bearing premise

That a 3.55 m all-electric ring with two counter-rotating beams can actually hold spin coherence for about a day and keep all residual magnetic-dipole rotations and background-field effects below the 5.8e-30 ecm statistical level; neither is measured or simulated in this Letter, and the systematic budget is explicitly deferred to a future proposal.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A one-ring eEDM experiment would reach 5.8e-30 ecm (90% C.L.) after five years, making a direct electron-EDM measurement competitive with the best indirect molecular bound (4.1e-30 ecm) and an independent sanity check.
  • A single axion ring would set bounds on scalar-pseudoscalar nucleon-electron couplings several orders of magnitude stronger than any existing or planned search, using earth-sourced or lab test-mass axion gradients.
  • Because spin transparency holds at any beam energy, the method avoids the magic-energy constraint of proton-style EDM rings and works with beams at or below 1 MeV, where Mott polarimetry is most efficient.
  • With a future polarized positron source, the same ring could measure the positron EDM at about 5e-29 ecm, enabling a direct electron-positron EDM comparison as a CP and CPT test.
  • The compact size keeps the cost near 7.5 million dollars per ring and suppresses synchrotron radiation, making the experiment accessible as a first step to multi-ring arrays that improve statistical precision.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the 1/SCT scaling in Eq. (15) is reliable, a ring that reaches only hours of spin coherence would push the five-year eEDM projection above the current molecular bound; a direct spin-coherence-time measurement on a prototype is the cheapest way to validate or rescale the projection.
  • The same Figure-8 geometry could be adapted to search for other spin-dependent new-physics couplings, such as Lorentz- or CPT-violating spin backgrounds, by replacing the eEDM interpretation with an anomalous precession search; the paper mentions such models but does not develop them.
  • The claimed axion sensitivity depends on averaging over five years of stable running; combining two or more rings in coincidence would also discriminate a real axion-gradient signal from common-mode magnetometer noise, which the paper does not discuss.
  • If spin transparency works as claimed, the spin-echo cancellation is effectively a way to suppress Larmor precession in a trapped-electron system, so a tabletop version could serve as a long-coherence spin register for quantum computing; the paper notes this application but presents no architecture.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. This Letter of Intent proposes compact (~1 m) all-electric spin-transparent storage rings for low-energy (~1 MeV) polarized electron beams at JLab's LERF. The core idea is that in a Figure-8 ring the magnetic-dipole-moment (MDM) spin precession cancels per turn—the 'spin transparency ansatz'—while an electron EDM (or an axion-field-induced) spin precession accumulates. The statistical projection is 5.8e-30 e·cm for the eEDM at 90% C.L. after five years with one ring, and 0.2 nHz for axion-induced precession, with a cost of $7.5M per ring. The manuscript also sketches a positron-EDM extension. Much of the technical content is taken from the authors' Refs. [1,2,3], and the systematic-uncertainty budget is explicitly deferred to a future proposal.

Significance. If realized, the proposal would provide the first direct eEDM measurement at a level near the current indirect bound, with a table-top footprint and modest cost, and an axion search whose projected spin-precession sensitivity exceeds existing storage-ring and Penning-trap approaches by several orders of magnitude. The paper is commendably explicit about its assumptions: the one-day spin coherence time, the spin-transparency ansatz, and the deferred systematic budget. Those assumptions are exactly what must be demonstrated before the projected reach can be taken as an experimental sensitivity, so the significance is conditional. The quantitative scaling in Eq. (15), the explicit parameter table, and the reliance on published technical papers for the ring optics are strengths; the absence of spin tracking, systematic-error analysis, and a derivation of the central cancellation leaves the headline claims unsupported as they stand.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3, Eq. (15), Table 3] The five-year eEDM reach is directly proportional to the assumed one-day spin coherence time, but no evidence for SCT = 1 day is given. Eq. (15) has SCT in the denominator, Table 3 sets SCT = 86,400 s, and item B4 in the Summary asserts '~1 day' without a spin-tracking result or scaling argument. Under the manuscript's one-fill-per-day schedule, reducing SCT by one order of magnitude raises the five-year statistical limit to about 6e-29 e·cm, well above the current indirect HfF+ bound of 4.1e-30 e·cm. Table 1 lists a longitudinal IBS growth time of 4 s, so the stochastic-cooling and RF-bunching system must maintain spin coherence over 86,400 s while cooling kicks and cavity fields act on the beam; this is a load-bearing assumption, not a demonstrated property.
  2. [§3, systematic uncertainty] The projected limit is a statistical floor only; the manuscript does not show that false-EDM systematics can be controlled at the 10^-29 e·cm level. The signal is a 4.7-microradian vertical-polarization buildup over five years, and §3 itself states that the systematic-uncertainty budget 'will be presented in the future proposal' and that 'there may still be some non-suppressible systematic uncertainties.' A radial background magnetic field produces exactly the EDM-like vertical spin rotation, and the counter-rotating-beam and spin-reversal combinations are asserted to suppress it without a quantitative error budget. Without this analysis, the claimed direct measurement near the current indirect bound is not established.
  3. [§2.2, Eq. (11)] The central cancellation of MDM precession is introduced as an ansatz rather than derived or demonstrated here. The abstract and §1.3 refer to the 'spin transparency ansatz' and the spin-echo effect, while Eq. (11), the EDM spin rotation per turn, is quoted with the derivation delegated to Ref. [2]. Because the EDM signal is computed as a perturbation on a canceled MDM motion, the manuscript needs at least a closed-orbit argument or a spin-tracking demonstration that the per-turn MDM rotation is zero for the design orbit and sufficiently small for off-momentum particles. As written, item B1's claim of insensitivity to energy and emittance is not checkable from this paper.
  4. [§4] The axion-search projection is not quantitatively supported in this manuscript. The paper states that the Figure-8 axion ring can measure a 0.2 nHz spin-precession rate and shows sensitivity curves in Fig. 5, but Fig. 5 is taken from Ref. [3] and no equation in §4 connects the 0.2 nHz rate to the axion-nucleon and axion-electron couplings, the axion mass range, or the ring parameters including SCT. Since the axion search is a headline goal, the projection should either be derived in the text or the relevant formulas and assumptions from Ref. [3] should be reproduced.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§3, Eq. (15)] The symbol p in the numerator of Eq. (15) is not defined; if it denotes polarization, it should be made consistent with the parameter P in Table 3.
  2. [§2.2, Eq. (11)] The arguments of the sine factors in Eq. (11) are not defined; the notation involving omega_n^M and 2 pi needs a definition of the orbital angle or path length at which the phase is evaluated.
  3. [Author list and headings] There are formatting glitches such as 'Brazi' in the author affiliation and 'T echnology development' in §1.3; please proofread the manuscript.
  4. [§5] The projected positron-EDM precision of about 5e-29 e·cm is stated without a derivation or a reference; a formula or a citation to the source of this estimate should be provided.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the spin-transparency ansatz, assumed SCT, and statistical projections are stated inputs and standard error propagation, not fitted outputs or self-referential derivations.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are conditional projections built on explicitly labeled inputs. The abstract and Sec. 1.3 state that 'Based on the spin transparency ansatz, the spin precession stemming from the magnetic dipole moment is canceled,' and Secs. 2.2 and 3 compute the EDM spin rotation per turn (Eq. 11, with derivation cited to the authors' Ref. [2]) and the per-fill statistical uncertainty (Eq. 15) from the Thomas-BMT equation, the ring parameters in Tables 1-3, and the assumed SCT = 1 day. These are not fitted parameters renamed as predictions; the claimed 5.8e-30 ecm limit is a straightforward evaluation of a statistical formula with stated input values, and the 0.2 nHz axion rate is similarly a sensitivity projection proportional to SCT. The paper is explicit that the spin-transparency condition is an 'ansatz' rather than a derived theorem, so no hidden equivalence between input and output is present. The heavy reliance on Refs. [1,2,3] by the same authors for the ring design, Eq. (11), and figures is self-citation, but it is not circular: the cited prior work is the origin of the design and perturbative formula, not an unverified premise that itself reduces to the targeted sensitivity claim. The unvalidated one-day spin coherence time and the deferred systematic budget are genuine correctness and feasibility risks, but they are unsupported assumptions, not circular reasoning. No step in the derivation reduces to its own input by construction, so the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper contributes a proposed experimental design and statistical projections. The physics content is largely drawn from Refs. [1,2,3] and from standard spin-precession theory. The key assumptions are the spin-transparency cancellation, the one-day spin coherence time, high electric field gradients, stochastic cooling, and the axion coupling model. No new particles, fields, or forces are introduced; the Figure-8 ST ring is an accelerator configuration, not a new physical entity.

free parameters (5)
  • Spin coherence time SCT = 1 day (86400 s)
    Assumed in Table 3; enters Eq. (15) linearly in the eEDM statistical error. Not demonstrated for the proposed 3.55 m all-electric ring.
  • Mott polarimeter efficiency = 0.0024
    Assumed in Table 3; affects the statistical scaling through the 1/sqrt(epsilon) factor in Eq. (15).
  • Electrons per fill = 5.0e10 per fill (2.5e10 CRA + 2.5e10 CRB)
    Assumed stored intensity in Table 3; the statistical error scales as 1/sqrt(N_e).
  • Electric field gradients = 5 MV/m longitudinal, <=10 MV/m bending
    Engineering assumptions in Sec. 2.2 used for the ring dimensions and revolution time in Eq. (13).
  • Polarization and analyzing power = P = 0.90, A_y = 0.45
    Assumed beam polarization and Mott analyzing power in Table 3, used in Eq. (15).
assumptions (6)
  • standard math The Thomas-BMT spin precession formalism, Eqs. (5-9), is the correct description of spin motion for an electron with magnetic and electric dipole moments.
    The paper uses these equations as the foundation for the EDM and axion precession arguments in Sec. 2.1.
  • domain assumption Spin transparency ansatz: in a Figure-8 all-electric ring, MDM precession cancels per turn at any beam energy, while EDM and axion precession accumulate.
    This is the central physical assumption of the proposal, introduced in the abstract and Sec. 1.3 and used throughout.
  • domain assumption Static longitudinal electric field sections can accelerate and decelerate the beam with energy recovery and do not spoil the spin cancellation; RF bunching fields average to zero over a turn.
    Sec. 2.2 relies on this to justify the two-energy ring design and to neglect RF-induced spin effects.
  • domain assumption Stochastic cooling maintains the beam intensities and IBS growth times listed in Table 1 for a 3.55 m low-energy electron ring.
    The projected statistical precision requires sustained stored intensity; the LOI assumes the cooling works as described in Ref. [2].
  • domain assumption Alow-mass axion field gradient couples to transversely polarized electron spin through the effective monopole-dipole and dipole interactions described in Refs. [70,72,73].
    Sec. 4 maps the measured spin precession rate onto the scalar-pseudoscalar nucleon-electron coupling parameter space using this model.
  • domain assumption Mott polarimetry at approximately 1 MeV has sufficient efficiency and analyzing power, and the beam lifetime is at least one day.
    Table 3 assumes these values; they directly drive the quoted statistical limit.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of High Precision Fundamental Physics Experiments at JLab with Spin-transparent Storage Rings of Low-energy Polarized Electron Beams." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZD2VGNZ6

@misc{pith2026260808551,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: High Precision Fundamental Physics Experiments at JLab with Spin-transparent Storage Rings of Low-energy Polarized Electron Beams},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZD2VGNZ6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.08551}
}
abstract

A breakthrough in fundamental physics experiments measuring particle spin precession may happen if spin-transparent storage rings become adopted tools for such experiments. We present a new design of highly specialized table-sized storage rings, which use low-energy polarized electron beams and Mott polarimetry. Based on the spin transparency ansatz, the spin precession stemming from the magnetic dipole moment is canceled at any beam energy after an electron's turn along the periodic orbit in the ring. Meanwhile, a spin precession induced by the fundamental physics of interest, e.g., the electron's permanent electric dipole moment (EDM) and/or ultralight-dark-matter-mediated forces such as axions, will accumulate. However, capitalizing on such types of rings is not only desirable for measurements of EDMs and axion searches relevant to $CP$ violation and matter-antimatter asymmetry in the Universe, but may also find very promising applications in quantum computing.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.08551 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Diagram describing the axion-mediated electron￾nucleon interaction. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overall survey of current limits (dark/solid areas) and future prospects (semi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure-8 ring config￾uration as an example of a ST storage ring, showing the most natural ST topology. Thereby, this LOI presents a method for measuring the eEDM in table-size storage rings with the electron’s polarized beam energy range up to 1 MeV or less, based on the use of the ST Figure-8 orbit symmetry. We will discuss conceptual and specific ring topologies shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left panel: Layout of the conceptual design of a two-energy ST storage ring for the eEDM measurement (the figure is not drawn to scale). The ring uses only static electric fields (E∥ and E⊥) except for a single RF bunching cavity. Only one of the two CR electron beams …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Axion-mediated monopole-dipole forces exerted on electrons at various spin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [2]

    On Possibilities of High Precision Fundamental Physics Experiments in Spin-Transparent Storage Rings of Low Energy Polarized Electron Beams

    R. Suleiman, V. S. Morozov and Y. S. Derbenev, “On Possibilities of High Precision Fundamental Physics Experiments in Spin-Transparent Storage Rings of Low Energy Polarized Electron Beams,” [arXiv:2105.11575 [physics.acc-ph]]

    work page Pith review arXiv

  2. [3]

    Particle accelerator spin- transparent storage rings for beyond state-of-the-art science,

    R. Suleiman, Y. Derbenev, M. Grau and V. Morozov, “Particle accelerator spin- transparent storage rings for beyond state-of-the-art science,” JACoWIP AC2024, WEAN2 (2024),https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article= 1901&context=physics fac pubs

    work page 2024

  3. [1]

    High precision fundamental physics experiments using compact spin-transparent storage rings of low energy polarized elec- tron beams,

    R. Suleiman, V. S. Morozov and Y. S. Derbenev, “High precision fundamental physics experiments using compact spin-transparent storage rings of low energy polarized elec- tron beams,” Phys. Lett. B843, 138058 (2023)

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    Spin-transparent storage rings for quan- tum computing,

    R. Suleiman, V. Morozov and M. Grau, “Spin-transparent storage rings for quan- tum computing,” JACoWNAP AC2025, THP076 (2026),https://inspirehep.net/ files/bf2c804e76de7725814af8ee9d5cd6e5. 20

    work page 2026

  5. [5]

    CP violation without strangeness: Electric dipole moments of particles, atoms, and molecules,

    I. B. Khriplovich and S. K. Lamoreaux, “CP violation without strangeness: Electric dipole moments of particles, atoms, and molecules,” Texts and Monographs in Physics, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (1997)

    work page 1997

  6. [6]

    Large long-distance contributions to the electric dipole moments of charged leptons in the standard model,

    Y. Yamaguchi and N. Yamanaka, “Large long-distance contributions to the electric dipole moments of charged leptons in the standard model,” Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 241802 (2020) [arXiv:2003.08195 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv 2020

  7. [7]

    Standard Model Prediction for Paramagnetic Elec- tric Dipole Moments,

    Y. Ema, T. Gao and M. Pospelov, “Standard Model Prediction for Paramagnetic Elec- tric Dipole Moments,” Phys. Rev. Lett.129, no.23, 231801 (2022) [arXiv:2202.10524 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv 2022

  8. [8]

    The Origin of the matter - antimatter asymmetry,

    M. Dine and A. Kusenko, “The Origin of the matter - antimatter asymmetry,” Rev. Mod. Phys.76, 1 (2003) [arXiv:hep-ph/0303065 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv 2003

Show all 78 references
  1. [9]

    Violation of CP Invariance, C asymmetry, and baryon asymmetry of the universe,

    A. D. Sakharov, “Violation of CP Invariance, C asymmetry, and baryon asymmetry of the universe,” Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.5, 32-35 (1967)

    1967

  2. [10]

    Standard model CP violation and baryon asymmetry,

    M. B. Gavela, P. Hernandez, J. Orloff and O. Pene, “Standard model CP violation and baryon asymmetry,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A9, 795-810 (1994) [arXiv:hep-ph/9312215 [hep-ph]]

    1994 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Electric Dipole Moments of Nucle- ons, Nuclei, and Atoms: The Standard Model and Beyond,

    J. Engel, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf and U. van Kolck, “Electric Dipole Moments of Nucle- ons, Nuclei, and Atoms: The Standard Model and Beyond,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 71, 21-74 (2013) [arXiv:1303.2371 [nucl-th]]

    2013 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Electric dipole moments of atoms, molecules, nuclei, and particles,

    T. Chupp, P. Fierlinger, M. Ramsey-Musolf and J. Singh, “Electric dipole moments of atoms, molecules, nuclei, and particles,” Rev. Mod. Phys.91, no.1, 015001 (2019) [arXiv:1710.02504 [physics.atom-ph]]

    2019 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Review of the electric dipole moment of light nuclei,

    N. Yamanaka, “Review of the electric dipole moment of light nuclei,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. E26, no.4, 1730002 (2017) [arXiv:1609.04759 [nucl-th]]

    2017 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Electric dipole moments as probes of new physics,

    M. Pospelov and A. Ritz, “Electric dipole moments as probes of new physics,” Annals Phys.318, 119-169 (2005) [arXiv:hep-ph/0504231 [hep-ph]]

    2005 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Electric dipole moments and the search for new physics,

    R. Alarcon, J. Alexander, V. Anastassopoulos, T. Aoki, R. Baartman, S. Baeßler, L. Bartoszek, D. H. Beck, F. Bedeschi and R. Berger,et al.“Electric dipole moments and the search for new physics,” Contribution to: Snowmass 2021, [arXiv:2203.08103 [hep-ph]]

    2021 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Improved measurement of the shape of the electron,

    J. J. Hudson, D. M. Kara, I. J. Smallman, B. E. Sauer, M. R. Tarbutt and E. A. Hinds, “Improved measurement of the shape of the electron,” Nature473, 493-496 (2011). 21

    2011

  9. [17]

    Order of Magnitude Smaller Limit on the Electric Dipole Moment of the Electron,

    J. Baronet al.[ACME], “Order of Magnitude Smaller Limit on the Electric Dipole Moment of the Electron,” Science343, 269-272 (2014) [arXiv:1310.7534 [physics.atom- ph]]

    2014 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Improved limit on the electric dipole moment of the electron,

    V. Andreevet al.[ACME], “Improved limit on the electric dipole moment of the electron,” Nature562, no.7727, 355-360 (2018)

    2018

  11. [19]

    Measuring the electric dipole moment of the electron in BaF,

    P. Aggarwalet al.[NL-eEDM], “Measuring the electric dipole moment of the electron in BaF,” [arXiv:1804.10012 [physics.atom-ph]]

    arXiv

  12. [20]

    New limit on the electron electric dipole moment,

    B. C. Regan, E. D. Commins, C. J. Schmidt and D. DeMille, “New limit on the electron electric dipole moment,” Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 071805 (2002)

    2002

  13. [21]

    Precision Measurement of the Electron’s Electric Dipole Moment Using Trapped Molecular Ions,

    W. B. Cairncross, D. N. Gresh, M. Grau, K. C. Cossel, T. S. Roussy, Y. Ni, Y. Zhou, J. Ye and E. A. Cornell, “Precision Measurement of the Electron’s Electric Dipole Moment Using Trapped Molecular Ions,” Phys. Rev. Lett.119, no.15, 153001 (2017) [arXiv:1704.07928 [physics.atom-ph]]

    2017 arXiv

  14. [22]

    An improved bound on the electron’s electric dipole moment,

    T. S. Roussy, L. Caldwell, T. Wright, W. B. Cairncross, Y. Shagam, K. B. Ng, N. Schlossberger, S. Y. Park, A. Wang and J. Ye,et al.“An improved bound on the electron’s electric dipole moment,” Science381, no.6653, adg4084 (2023) [arXiv:2212.11841 [physics.atom-ph]]

    2023 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Equivalent electric dipole moment in SMEFT,

    M. Ardu and N. Valori, “Equivalent electric dipole moment in SMEFT,” Phys. Rev. D113, no.1, 015035 (2026) [arXiv:2503.21920 [hep-ph]]

    2026 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Precision Measurement of Time-Reversal Symme- try Violation with Laser-Cooled Polyatomic Molecules,

    I. Kozyryev and N. R. Hutzler, “Precision Measurement of Time-Reversal Symme- try Violation with Laser-Cooled Polyatomic Molecules,” Phys. Rev. Lett.119, no.13, 133002 (2017) [arXiv:1705.11020 [physics.atom-ph]]

    2017 arXiv

  17. [25]

    An Improved Limit on the Muon Electric Dipole Moment,

    G. W. Bennettet al.[Muon (g-2)], “An Improved Limit on the Muon Electric Dipole Moment,” Phys. Rev. D80, 052008 (2009) [arXiv:0811.1207 [hep-ex]]

    2009 arXiv

  18. [26]

    An improved search for the electric dipole moment of theτ lepton,

    K. Inamiet al.[Belle], “An improved search for the electric dipole moment of theτ lepton,” JHEP04, 110 (2022) [arXiv:2108.11543 [hep-ex]]

    2022 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Measurement of the Permanent Electric Dipole Moment of the Neutron,

    C. Abel, S. Afach, N. J. Ayres, C. A. Baker, G. Ban, G. Bison, K. Bodek, V. Bondar, M. Burghoff and E. Chanel,et al.“Measurement of the Permanent Electric Dipole Moment of the Neutron,” Phys. Rev. Lett.124, no.8, 081803 (2020) [arXiv:2001.11966 [hep-ex]]

    2020 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Reduced Limit on the Per- manent Electric Dipole Moment of 199Hg,

    B. Graner, Y Chen, E. G. Lindahl, B. R. Heckel, “Reduced Limit on the Per- manent Electric Dipole Moment of 199Hg,” Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 161601 (2016) [arXiv:1601.04339 [physics.atom-ph]]. 22

    2016 arXiv

  21. [29]

    A Storage Ring Experiment to Detect a Proton Electric Dipole Moment,

    V. Anastassopoulos, S. Andrianov, R. Baartman, M. Bai, S. Baessler, J. Benante, M. Berz, M. Blaskiewicz, T. Bowcock and K. Brown,et al.“A Storage Ring Experiment to Detect a Proton Electric Dipole Moment,” Rev. Sci. Instrum.87, no.11, 115116 (2016) [arXiv:1502.04317 [physics.acc-ph]]

    2016 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Hybrid ring design in the storage-ring proton electric dipole moment experiment,

    S. Haciomeroglu and Y. K. Semertzidis, “Hybrid ring design in the storage-ring proton electric dipole moment experiment,” Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams22, no.3, 034001 (2019) [arXiv:1806.09319 [physics.acc-ph]]

    2019 arXiv

  23. [31]

    A Proposal to Measure the Pro- ton Electric Dipole Moment with 10 −29 e·cm Sensitivity,

    V. Anastassopouloset al.[Storage Ring EDM], “A Proposal to Measure the Pro- ton Electric Dipole Moment with 10 −29 e·cm Sensitivity,”https://inspirehep.net/ files/fedd912e77ee5f1defd288d2ea8f8aeb,https://www.bnl.gov/edm/index.html

  24. [32]

    Comprehensive symmetric-hybrid ring design for a proton EDM experiment at below 10-29e·cm,

    Z. Omarov, H. Davoudiasl, S. Haciomeroglu, V. Lebedev, W. M. Morse, Y. K. Se- mertzidis, A. J. Silenko, E. J. Stephenson and R. Suleiman, “Comprehensive symmetric-hybrid ring design for a proton EDM experiment at below 10-29e·cm,” Phys. Rev. D105, no.3, 032001 (2022) [arXiv:20...

    2022 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Storage ring to search for electric dipole moments of charged particles: Feasibility study,

    F. Abusaifet al.[CPEDM], “Storage ring to search for electric dipole moments of charged particles: Feasibility study,” CERN, 2021, [arXiv:1912.07881 [hep-ex]]

    2021 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Electric dipole moment of light nuclei− 6Li, 7Li, 9Be, 11B, and 13C −,

    N. Yamanaka, “Electric dipole moment of light nuclei− 6Li, 7Li, 9Be, 11B, and 13C −,” Hyperfine Interact.239, 35 (2018) [arXiv:1805.05982 [nucl-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Schiff screening of relativistic nucleon electric-dipole moments by electrons,

    C. P. Liu and J. Engel, “Schiff screening of relativistic nucleon electric-dipole moments by electrons,” Phys. Rev. C76, 028501 (2007) [arXiv:0705.1981 [nucl-th]]

    2007 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Feasibility of search for nuclear electric dipole moments at ion storage rings,

    I. B. Khriplovich, “Feasibility of search for nuclear electric dipole moments at ion storage rings,” Phys. Lett. B444, 98-102 (1998) [arXiv:hep-ph/9809336 [hep-ph]]

    1998 arXiv

  29. [37]

    How to Reach a Thousand-Second in-Plane Polarization Lifetime with 0.97-GeV/c Deuterons in a Storage Ring,

    G. Guidoboniet al.[JEDI], “How to Reach a Thousand-Second in-Plane Polarization Lifetime with 0.97-GeV/c Deuterons in a Storage Ring,” Phys. Rev. Lett.117, no.5, 054801 (2016)

    2016

  30. [38]

    CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, “CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,” Phys. Rev. Lett.38, 1440-1443 (1977)

    1977

  31. [39]

    Constraints Imposed by CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, “Constraints Imposed by CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,” Phys. Rev. D16, 1791-1797 (1977)

    1977

  32. [40]

    An introduction to axions and their detection,

    I. G. Irastorza, “An introduction to axions and their detection,” SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes45, 1 (2022) [arXiv:2109.07376 [hep-ph]]

    2022 arXiv

  33. [41]

    A New Light Boson?,

    S. Weinberg, “A New Light Boson?,” Phys. Rev. Lett.40, 223-226 (1978). 23

    1978

  34. [42]

    Problem of StrongPandTInvariance in the Presence of Instantons,

    F. Wilczek, “Problem of StrongPandTInvariance in the Presence of Instantons,” Phys. Rev. Lett.40, 279-282 (1978)

    1978

  35. [43]

    The Birth of Axions,

    F. Wilczek, “The Birth of Axions,” Current Contents16, 8-9 (1991)

    1991

  36. [44]

    The Strong CP problem and axions,

    R. D. Peccei, “The Strong CP problem and axions,” Lect. Notes Phys.741, 3-17 (2008) [arXiv:hep-ph/0607268 [hep-ph]]

    2008 arXiv

  37. [45]

    The landscape of QCD axion models,

    L. Di Luzio, M. Giannotti, E. Nardi and L. Visinelli, “The landscape of QCD axion models,” Phys. Rept.870, 1-117 (2020) [arXiv:2003.01100 [hep-ph]]

    2020 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Axions In String Theory,

    P. Svrcek and E. Witten, “Axions In String Theory,” JHEP06, 051 (2006) [arXiv:hep- th/0605206 [hep-th]]

    2006

  39. [47]

    String Axiverse,

    A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, S. Dubovsky, N. Kaloper and J. March-Russell, “String Axiverse,” Phys. Rev. D81, 123530 (2010) [arXiv:0905.4720 [hep-th]]

    2010 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Weak Interaction Singlet and Strong CP Invariance,

    J. E. Kim, “Weak Interaction Singlet and Strong CP Invariance,” Phys. Rev. Lett.43, 103 (1979)

    1979

  41. [49]

    Can Confinement Ensure Natural CP Invariance of Strong Interactions?,

    M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein and V. I. Zakharov, “Can Confinement Ensure Natural CP Invariance of Strong Interactions?,” Nucl. Phys. B166, 493-506 (1980)

    1980

  42. [50]

    A Simple Solution to the Strong CP Problem with a Harmless Axion,

    M. Dine, W. Fischler and M. Srednicki, “A Simple Solution to the Strong CP Problem with a Harmless Axion,” Phys. Lett. B104, 199-202 (1981)

    1981

  43. [51]

    On Possible Suppression of the Axion Hadron Interactions (in Rus- sian),

    A. R. Zhitnitsky, “On Possible Suppression of the Axion Hadron Interactions (in Rus- sian),” Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.31, 260 (1980)

    1980

  44. [52]

    New experimental approaches in the search for axion- like particles,

    I. G. Irastorza and J. Redondo, “New experimental approaches in the search for axion- like particles,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.102, 89-159 (2018) [arXiv:1801.08127 [hep-ph]]

    2018 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Acceleration of polarized particles,

    Y. S. Derbenev and A. Kondratenko, “Acceleration of polarized particles,” Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR (in Russian),223, no.4, 830 (1975)

    1975

  46. [54]

    The Twisted Spin Synchrotron,

    Y. S. Derbenev, “The Twisted Spin Synchrotron,” (1996) [arXiv:2404.00073 [physics.acc-ph]]

    1996 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Electric dipole moment planning with a resurrected BNL Alternating Gradient Synchrotron electron analog ring,

    R. M. Talman and J. D. Talman, “Electric dipole moment planning with a resurrected BNL Alternating Gradient Synchrotron electron analog ring,” Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams18, no.7, 074004 (2015) [arXiv:1503.08494 [physics.acc-ph]]

    2015 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Axion couplings in grand unified theories,

    P. Agrawal, M. Nee and M. Reig, “Axion couplings in grand unified theories,” JHEP 10, 141 (2022) [arXiv:2206.07053 [hep-ph]]. 24

    2022 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Axion couplings in heterotic string theory,

    P. Agrawal, M. Nee and M. Reig, “Axion couplings in heterotic string theory,” JHEP 02, 188 (2025) [arXiv:2410.03820 [hep-ph]]

    2025 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Testing the heterotic string with the axion-photon cou- pling,

    M. Reig and T. Weigand, “Testing the heterotic string with the axion-photon cou- pling,” JHEP01, 006 (2026) [arXiv:2509.08042 [hep-th]]

    2026

  51. [59]

    Derivation of Generalized Thomas-Bargmann-Michel- Telegdi Equation for a Particle with Electric Dipole Moment,

    T. Fukuyama and A. J. Silenko, “Derivation of Generalized Thomas-Bargmann-Michel- Telegdi Equation for a Particle with Electric Dipole Moment,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 28, 1350147 (2013) [arXiv:1308.1580 [hep-ph]]

    2013 arXiv

  52. [60]

    The Kinematics of an electron with an axis,

    L. H. Thomas, “The Kinematics of an electron with an axis,” Phil. Mag. Ser. 73, 1-21 (1927)

    1927

  53. [61]

    Transparent Spin Method for Spin Control of Hadron Beams in Colliders,

    Y. N. Filatov, A. M. Kondratenko, M. A. Kondratenko, Y. S. Derbenev and V. S. Mo- rozov, “Transparent Spin Method for Spin Control of Hadron Beams in Colliders,” Phys. Rev. Lett.124, no.19, 194801 (2020) [arXiv:2003.11469 [physics.acc-ph]]

    2020 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Feasibility of measuring EDM in spin transparent colliders,

    A. Kondratenko, M. Kondratenko, Y. Filatov, A. Kovalenko, Y. Derbenev and V. Mo- rozov, “Feasibility of measuring EDM in spin transparent colliders,” EPJ Web Conf. 204, 10013 (2019)

    2019

  55. [63]

    Operation of an isochronous beam recirculation sys- tem,

    J. B. Flanz and C. P. Sargent, “Operation of an isochronous beam recirculation sys- tem,” Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A241, 325-333 (1985)

    1985

  56. [64]

    A New method of measuring elec- tric dipole moments in storage rings,

    F. J. M. Farley, K. Jungmann, J. P. Miller, W. M. Morse, Y. F. Orlov, B. L. Roberts, Y. K. Semertzidis, A. Silenko and E. J. Stephenson, “A New method of measuring elec- tric dipole moments in storage rings,” Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 052001 (2004) [arXiv:hep- ex/0307006 [hep-ex]]

    2004

  57. [65]

    New method of probing an oscillating EDM induced by axionlike dark matter using an rf Wien filter in storage rings,

    O. Kim and Y. K. Semertzidis, “New method of probing an oscillating EDM induced by axionlike dark matter using an rf Wien filter in storage rings,” Phys. Rev. D104, no.9, 096006 (2021) [arXiv:2105.06655 [hep-ph]]

    2021 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Geometric phase effect study in electric dipole moment rings,

    C. Carli and M. Haj Tahar, “Geometric phase effect study in electric dipole moment rings,” Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams25, no.6, 064001 (2022)

    2022

  59. [67]

    Longitudinal wake field for an elec- tron moving on a circular orbit,

    J. B. Murphy, S. Krinsky and R. L. Gluckstern, “Longitudinal wake field for an elec- tron moving on a circular orbit,” Part. Accel.57, 9-64 (1997) BNL-63090,https: //inspirehep.net/files/1afd5dcc4e791d233fb0ffb5a2f270a4

    1997

  60. [68]

    R. L. Warnock and P. L. Morton, Part. Accel.25, 113 (1990) SLAC-PUB-4562,https: //slac.stanford.edu/pubs/slacpubs/4500/slac-pub-4562.pdf. 25

    1990

  61. [69]

    Correct- ing systematic errors in high-sensitivity deuteron polarization measurements,

    N. P. M. Brantjes, V. Dzhordzhadze, R. Gebel, F. Gonnella, F. E. Gray, D. J. van der Hoek, A. Imig, W. L. Kruithof, D. M. Lazarus and A. Lehrach,et al.“Correct- ing systematic errors in high-sensitivity deuteron polarization measurements,” Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A664, 49-64 (2012)

    2012

  62. [70]

    Storage ring probes of dark matter and dark energy,

    P. W. Graham, S. Haciomeroglu, D. E. Kaplan, Z. Omarov, S. Rajendran and Y. K. Se- mertzidis, “Storage ring probes of dark matter and dark energy,” Phys. Rev. D103, no.5, 055010 (2021) [arXiv:2005.11867 [hep-ph]]

    2021 arXiv

  63. [71]

    New bounds and future prospects for axion force searches at Penning trap experiments,

    X. Fan and M. Reig, “New bounds and future prospects for axion force searches at Penning trap experiments,” [arXiv:2310.18797 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv

  64. [72]

    Searching for axion forces with precision precession in storage rings,

    P. Agrawal, D. E. Kaplan, O. Kim, S. Rajendran and M. Reig, “Searching for axion forces with precision precession in storage rings,” Phys. Rev. D108, no.1, 015017 (2023) [arXiv:2210.17547 [hep-ph]]

    2023 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Searching for axion forces with spin precession in atoms and molecules,

    P. Agrawal, N. R. Hutzler, D. E. Kaplan, S. Rajendran and M. Reig, “Searching for axion forces with spin precession in atoms and molecules,” JHEP07, 133 (2024) [arXiv:2309.10023 [hep-ph]]

    2024 arXiv

  66. [74]

    The Sherman function and its radiative corrections for elastic positron-nucleus scattering,

    D. Jakubassa, “The Sherman function and its radiative corrections for elastic positron-nucleus scattering,”https://indico.jlab.org/event/964/contributions/ 18030/attachments/13893/22471/DJA-JLab26.pdf, to appear in LEEPP2026 confer- ence proceedings

  67. [75]

    Constraints on Lorentz violation parameter through electric dipole moments,

    S. Aghababaei, “Constraints on Lorentz violation parameter through electric dipole moments,” Eur. Phys. J. C84, no.2, 173 (2024)

    2024

  68. [76]

    Testing CPT and Lorentz symmetry with electrons and positrons in Penning traps,

    R. Bluhm, V. A. Kostelecky and N. Russell, “Testing CPT and Lorentz symmetry with electrons and positrons in Penning traps,” AIP Conf. Proc.457, no.1, 138 (1999) [arXiv:hep-ph/9810287 [hep-ph]]

    1999 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Lorentz and CPT Tests in Neutron and Storage-Ring EDM Experiments,

    Y. Ding, “Lorentz and CPT Tests in Neutron and Storage-Ring EDM Experiments,” [arXiv:2601.08899 [hep-ph]]

  70. [78]

    Siberian snakes, figure-8 and spin transparency techniques for high precision experiments with polarized hadron beams in colliders,

    Ya S. Derbenev, Yu. N. Filatov, A. M. Kondratenko, M. A. Kondratenko and V. S. Mo- rozov, “Siberian snakes, figure-8 and spin transparency techniques for high precision experiments with polarized hadron beams in colliders,” Symmetry13, 398 (2021), https://www.mdpi.com/2073-899...

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.