Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 48 references

Moment of Inertia of an Interacting Bose Gas

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For a weakly interacting Bose gas in $\phi^4$ theory, the moment of inertia density equals the squared distance to the rotation axis times the enthalpy density, through order $\lambda^{3/2}$ including ring resummation.

desk verdict The central identity is sound at demonstrated order; the broader negative-moment-of-inertia claim overreaches its support, and the Ref. [26] correction is likely right but scheme-dependent. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.11129 v1 pith:XYDZLSF3 submitted 2026-08-11 hep-th nucl-th

Aleksandar Gecic , Victor E. Ambrus , Kenji Fukushima This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thnucl-th
keywords momentofinertiarotatingBosegasphi^4theorythermalfieldringdiagramsenthalpydensitydaisyresummationBesselfunction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to establish that a rotating, weakly interacting scalar Bose gas obeys the same relation between rotation and matter distribution as a classical gas: the moment of inertia density is $I = r_\perp^2 h$, where $r_\perp$ is the distance from the rotation axis and $h = p + e$ is the enthalpy density. The relation is verified explicitly in $\phi^4$ theory through order $\lambda^{3/2}$, including the resummation of ring (daisy) diagrams, and for any value of the field mass. The paper also argues that a previous calculation reporting a negative moment of inertia at large coupling mishandled the summation over angular-momentum modes and the spatial integration over Bessel functions. If the argument is right, interactions lower the moment of inertia through the thermal mass but cannot make it negative in this scalar model.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the two-particle-irreducible (2PI) free energy truncated at one loop, combined with a momentum-independent self-energy $\Pi$ fixed by the gap equation $\Pi = (\lambda/2)\int dP_\Pi\, n_B(\varepsilon_\Pi)$, the daisy/ring resummation. Momentum independence is what lets the integrands for $I_1$ and $I_2$ collapse into the same integrals that define the kinetic pieces $e'$ and $p'$ of the energy and pressure densities, making $I = r_\perp^2(e'+p') = r_\perp^2 h$ a bookkeeping identity. The second piece of machinery is the Bessel-function summation, $\sum_\ell J_\ell(z)^2 = 1$ and $\sum_\ell \ell^2 J_\ell(z)^2 = z^2/2$, together with the ordering rule that the angular-momentum sum must be performed before the transverse spatial integration.

What would settle it

Compute the $O(\lambda^2)$ sunset corrections to $I_1$, $I_2$, and $h$ separately without assuming a momentum-independent self-energy; if $I_1+I_2$ divided by $r_\perp^2 h$ deviates from unity at that order, the identity fails beyond the demonstrated precision. A complete calculation inside the light-cylinder boundary would similarly settle whether the angular-momentum sum must precede the spatial integral.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is the identity $I = r_\perp^2 h$ for the finite-temperature self-interacting scalar, shown to hold at $O(\lambda^{3/2})$ for arbitrary vacuum mass $m$. Writing the zero-rotation moment of inertia as $I = I_1 + I_2$, where $I_1$ comes from the two-point angular-momentum correlation function and $I_2$ from the $\Omega^2$ piece of the Lagrangian, the connected four-point vertex contributes zero at this order; the surviving disconnected pieces give $I_1 = r_\perp^2 e'$ and $I_2 = r_\perp^2 p'$, whose sum is $r_\perp^2 h$. The same identity survives when the free propagator is replaced by the daisy-resummed propagator built from the momentum-independent self-energy satisfying the gap equation. The earlier negative-moment-of-inertia result is traced to an incorrect order of operations: integrating over all space before summing over the angular-momentum quantum number produces a divergent $\sum_\ell \ell^2$ that was regularized by hand, whereas the correct treatment performs the $\ell$ sum first using Bessel identities and then integrates over $r_\perp$. In the resummed large-coupling limit the enthalpy falls like $(\ln \lambda)^4/\lambda$, so self-interaction monotonically diminishes $I$ while keeping it positive.

Load-bearing premise

The result depends on assuming that the one-loop daisy resummation with a momentum-independent self-energy captures every interaction effect relevant at the computed orders, and that in the rotating-frame calculation the angular-momentum sum must be taken before the integral over the transverse distance.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In the massless limit the explicit expression is $I = r_\perp^2\big[\frac{2\pi^2 T^4}{45} - \frac{\lambda}{4!}\frac{T^4}{12} + (\frac{\lambda}{4!})^{3/2}\frac{T^4}{3\pi}\big]$, with the nonanalytic $\lambda^{3/2}$ term coming from ring resummation.
  • With the self-consistent gap equation solved exactly, the moment of inertia falls monotonically as the coupling grows, unlike the naive perturbative expansion, and it remains positive for all $\lambda$.
  • The relation $I = r_\perp^2 h$ holds for any vacuum mass $m$ when $h$ is expressed through the thermal mass $m_\Pi^2 = m^2 + \Pi$.
  • Since $h>0$, self-interactions in this scalar model cannot explain the negative moment of inertia reported for rotating gluon plasma; some other mechanism must be responsible.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Going beyond the paper, the structure of the proof suggests that any field theory whose self-energy is momentum-independent at the relevant order will satisfy the same $I = r_\perp^2 h$ identity, so the relation is likely a thermodynamic bookkeeping statement rather than a peculiarity of $\phi^4$.
  • A concrete next-step test would be an $O(\lambda^2)$ computation keeping the sunset momentum dependence; if it preserves the identity, the result is likely exact to all orders, whereas a violation would localize the first place the simple relation breaks.
  • The ordering prescription for the $\ell$ sum and the $r_\perp$ integral predicts that a successful bounded-system calculation inside the light cylinder (still open in the paper's account) should reproduce the same zero-rotation limit, which would provide an independent check of the correction.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper computes the moment of inertia density of a weakly interacting scalar phi^4 gas in the limit of vanishing angular velocity. The authors express I = dJ/dOmega at Omega=0 in terms of thermal two- and four-point functions at zero rotation (Eqs. (17)-(19)), and then evaluate these diagrams in a 2PI one-loop/daisy truncation with a momentum-independent self-energy. They find that the disconnected contributions give I = r_perp^2 e' + r_perp^2 p' = r_perp^2 h, with h = e+p, both at O(lambda^(3/2)) and for the self-consistent solution of the gap equation (70). The paper also reanalyzes Ref. [26], arguing that its negative moment of inertia arises from an incorrect treatment of the summation over angular momentum and the spatial integration of Bessel functions, and concludes that scalar self-interactions reduce the moment of inertia monotonically but cannot make it negative.

Significance. If the result stands, the paper establishes a surprisingly simple relation, I = r_perp^2 h, for an interacting Bose gas, and it directly challenges a recent calculation that reported a negative moment of inertia in phi^4 theory. The derivation is detailed and internally consistent at the order shown: the vanishing of the connected O(lambda) diagram, the factor 1/2 in I_{1;2'}, the Bessel identities, and the independent enthalpy computation from the energy-momentum tensor are all worked out explicitly, and the resummed gap equation is solved and analyzed including its large-coupling asymptotics. The paper also gives a clear and concrete falsifiable prediction: within the 2PI one-loop truncation, the identity holds for arbitrary mass and for the daisy-resummed propagator. The main weakness is that the proof is carried out only for a momentum-independent self-energy, and the general conclusions are worded more broadly than the demonstrated support.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. IV D, Eqs. (93)-(96), and Sec. V] The load-bearing step I_{1;2'} = (1/2) int d^3x r_perp^2 e' uses the identity p[G(P)]^2 = -(1/2) dG(P)/dp, which is valid only when G(P) depends on p through |p|^2, i.e., when the self-energy Pi is momentum-independent. The paper itself notes (Sec. IV A, after Eq. (72)) that momentum dependence enters first at O(lambda^2) from the sunset diagram. Consequently, the equality I = r_perp^2 h is established for the 2PI one-loop/daisy truncation, but not in the full theory beyond O(lambda^(3/2)); at O(lambda^2) the sunset contribution could affect I_1 and I_2 differently from e' and p'. The concluding statement in Sec. V that 'self-interactions cannot account for the emergence of a negative moment of inertia' is therefore stronger than the calculation supports. I recommend either extending the calculation to include the O(lambda^2) sunset contribution to I_1 and I_2, or explicitly qualifying all global claims as results of the momentum-independent-Pi truncation.
  2. [Sec. IV E, Eqs. (101)-(105)] The criticism of Ref. [26] hinges on the prescription that the ell-summation must be performed before the transverse spatial integration, using the Bessel identities in Eqs. (44) and (103). The paper argues but does not prove that this ordering is the physically correct one; it acknowledges that the alternative treatment with a bounded system inside the light cylinder (Ref. [30]) is intractable so far. The inconsistency of the Ref. [26] result with the classical result Eq. (33) is a strong indication, but the statement that the 'main error' is the incorrect treatment of the summation/integration order would be more convincing if accompanied by a justification of the ordering, for example from the definition of the local density I(x) in Eq. (7) and from the requirement that the total I be obtained by integrating a well-defined local density.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Introduction] The word 'inheritated' should be 'inherited'.
  2. [Sec. III] The phrase '2PI (particle irreducible)' should be '2PI (two-particle-irreducible)' on first use.
  3. [Sec. IV A, Eq. (69)] The notation G(0) for the coincident-point propagator is easy to confuse with the free propagator G_0; please define it explicitly at first use.
  4. [Appendix A, Eq. (A2)] The constant C is described as an ultraviolet divergent constant and then set to zero; it would be helpful to state explicitly that this contact-term regularization is the same one used in Eqs. (76) and (78), since the cancellation of C is relevant for the final identity.
  5. [Sec. IV E, Eq. (106)] The comparison with Ref. [26] introduces a degeneracy factor g=2 for a charged scalar field; the paper should clarify how this factor enters the comparison with the real scalar theory of Eq. (8).
  6. [Fig. 1] The caption states that the dashed perturbative curves become nonmonotonic for lambda >~ 1, indicating breakdown of naive perturbation; marking the breakdown region more explicitly would help readers distinguish the resummed results used in the conclusions from the unreliable perturbative ones.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: I = r_perp^2 h is derived from independent diagrammatic evaluations of I_1, I_2, and the enthalpy h; the self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The central identity (22) is not assumed or fitted. I_1 and I_2 are evaluated from the zero-rotation correlation-function definitions (18)-(19): I_2 reduces to r_perp^2 p' in Eq. (84), while I_1 is obtained through the nontrivial derivative-of-delta computation in Eqs. (93)-(96), giving r_perp^2 e'. The enthalpy h is computed separately from the energy-momentum tensor in Sec. IV B, Eqs. (73)-(81), including the Lagrangian expectation value (79). The identity I = r_perp^2 h then follows from the algebraic relation h = e' + p' = e + p, but the two sides are not the same object by construction: I_1 and I_2 weight the dressed propagator with angular-momentum operators, while h weights it with (-omega_n^2 + p^2/3). The key step p[G(P)]^2 = -(1/2) dG/dp in Eq. (96) is an exact identity for the momentum-independent self-energy propagator (72), not an input assuming the conclusion; the paper explicitly limits the treatment to this truncation and notes momentum dependence of the self-energy begins only at O(lambda^2) (Sec. IV A). No parameter is fitted to data and no external benchmark is tuned. The self-citations (Refs. [16], [17], [25]) are contextual support or previous conjectures, not used to exclude alternatives or to justify the scalar-field derivation. The only substantive limitation, that O(lambda^2) sunset contributions could break the identity, is an acknowledged domain-of-validity gap, not a circular step.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No parameters are fitted: lambda, m, T are inputs of the theory; the self-energy Pi is determined by the gap equation (70); the momentum cutoff Lambda in Appendix C is a regulator whose residual logarithmic divergence enters only at O(lambda^2). No new particles, fields, forces, or conserved quantities are postulated. The main choices are the 2PI one-loop truncation, the vacuum-term regularization, and the cylindrical-mode summation ordering.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Bessel function identities: sum_ell J_ell^2(z) = 1, sum_ell ell^2 J_ell^2(z) = z^2/2, and the orthogonality relation Eq. (102).
    Used to perform the ell-summation and transverse integrals in Secs. III B and IV E (Eqs. (44), (102)-(103)); standard results.
  • domain assumption The rotating thermal state is described by the grand canonical density matrix with H - Omega*J (Eq. (1)) and the Killing vector beta(d_t + Omega d_phi) (Eq. (23)); the moment of inertia is defined as the Omega-to-0 susceptibility (Eq. (7)).
    Standard rotating thermal QFT setup; the Omega-to-0 definition is the paper's strategy to bypass the causality bound r_perp*Omega < 1.
  • domain assumption The 2PI one-loop (daisy) truncation with momentum-independent self-energy Pi (gap equation Eq. (70), resummed propagator Eq. (72)) captures interaction effects up to O(lambda^(3/2)); momentum-dependent self-energy contributions are dropped.
    Load-bearing for the resummed results and the generality of I = r_perp^2 h; the paper flags the O(lambda^2) limitation explicitly in Sec. IV A.
  • domain assumption Ultraviolet and contact-divergent vacuum contributions (the constant C in Eq. (A2) and T = 0 parts of Matsubara sums) are discarded.
    Standard thermal-field-theory regularization (normal ordering), invoked in Sec. IV B and Appendix A; a choice rather than a fitted parameter.
  • domain assumption The ell-summation must be performed before the transverse spatial integration when evaluating the rotation-induced free energy in cylindrical modes.
    Central to the correction of Ref. [26]; justified by agreement with the classical/kinetic result and the extensivity of I, but not proven against the finite-boundary light-cylinder prescription of Ref. [30].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Moment of Inertia of an Interacting Bose Gas." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XYDZLSF3

@misc{pith2026260811129,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Moment of Inertia of an Interacting Bose Gas},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XYDZLSF3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.11129}
}
abstract

The response of many-body quantum systems to rotation can be characterized by the moment of inertia. For a classical gas, the moment of inertia can be expressed as the integral of the enthalpy density multiplied by the squared radial distance from the rotation axis. In quantum field theory, the finite rotation in the grand canonical ensemble demands the causality bound. This constraint imposes technical challenges in treating transverse momenta discretized with the Bessel function zeros. However, we define the moment of inertia in the limit of zero angular velocity, in which the causality constraint is irrelevant and ordinary quantum field theoretical techniques can be applied. We evaluate the moment of inertia in the $\phi^4$ theory and find that, surprisingly, the interacting effects including the ring-diagram resummation are consistent with the classical expectation and the moment of inertia density remains proportional to the enthalpy density.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.11129 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (Top) The self-energy Π in Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages

  1. [26]

    Moment of Inertia of an Interacting Bose Gas

    of the self-interactingϕ 4 scalar field theory indi- cate that the nonanalyticλ 3/2 contribution to the ther- modynamic potential, arising from the resummation of infrared-divergent ring diagrams, makes negative contri- butions to the moment of inertia, eventually leading to a arXiv:2608.11129v1 [hep-th] 11 Aug 2026 2 negative overall value at large enoug...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2026

  2. [30]

    Chiral phase transition and spin align- ment of vector mesons in the polarized-Polyakov-loop Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model under rotation,

    Fei Sun, Jingdong Shao, Rui Wen, Kun Xu, and Mei Huang, “Chiral phase transition and spin align- ment of vector mesons in the polarized-Polyakov-loop Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model under rotation,” Phys. Rev. D109, 116017 (2024), arXiv:2402.16595 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2024

  3. [1]

    Nevertheless, as we will see later, the phase space integrations involve nonstandard complications

    ˆϕ(X2) ˆϕ(X′ 2)⟩.(21) It is important to emphasize that these expectation val- ues are taken at vanishing rotation; thereby, for the eval- uation of the moment of inertia, we can safely employ standard thermal field theory techniques. Nevertheless, as we will see later, the phase space integrations involve nonstandard complications. III. HEURISTIC DISCUSS...

    work page

  4. [2]

    (37) to deduce the higher-order corrections

    Higher-order contribution In principle, we can systematically expand Eq. (37) to deduce the higher-order corrections. Here, let us consider the corrections up toO(λ 3/2). For this purpose, it is convenient to reorganize Eq. (37) as F= 1 2 ⨋ P [lnG−1 0 +(lnG −1−lnG −1 0 )−ΠG]+Φ.(55) Here, we usedG −1 0 =G −1−Π for the last term. The first term is nothing b...

    work page

  5. [3]

    Therefore, Eq

    Zeroth order contribution At zeroth order inλ, we drop the interaction effects, leading to Π=Φ=0 andG=G 0. Therefore, Eq. (37) reduces toF→F (0) = 1 2 ⨋ lnG−1 0 . The above-mentioned recipe immediately gives the free energy of a noninter- acting Bose gas under rotation as F(0) =T ∫ℓ d3p (2π)3 ln(1−e −β˜ε) .(41) This expression can be evaluated up toO(Ω 2)...

    work page

  6. [4]

    Negative moment of inertia and rotational instability of gluon plasma,

    Victor V. Braguta, Maxim N. Chernodub, Artem A. Roenko, and Dmitrii A. Sychev, “Negative moment of inertia and rotational instability of gluon plasma,” Phys. Lett. B852, 138604 (2024), arXiv:2303.03147 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2024

  7. [5]

    Facets of Rotating Quark-Gluon Plasma

    The integrand is an odd func- tion ofP µ i , thus ⨋ Pi results in zero. Hence, we conclude I(1) 1;conn =0. Up to the order of our present interest, therefore, we are left with the contributions coming from the dis- connected diagrams. In the leading order, the discon- nected contribution is given by all possible combina- tions of two-point functions that ...

    work page 2023

  8. [6]

    In the above expression,Cis an ultraviolet di- vergent constant;C=T ∑n, which is independent ofω, that is,∝δ(τ)in Euclidean time

    Matsubara frequency summation The one-loop calculation frequently meets the follow- ing summations with respect to the Matsubara frequency, ωn =2πnT, i.e., T ∑ n 1 ω2n+ω 2 = 1 ω [nB(ω)+ 1 2],(A1) T ∑ n ω2 n ω2n+ω 2 =−ω[n B(ω)+ 1 2]+C ,(A2) T ∑ n 1 (ω2n+ω 2)2 = 1 2ω3 [nB(ω)+ 1 2]− 1 2ω2 dnB dω (A3) withn B(ω)=(e βω −1)−1 the Bose-Einstein distribution func...

    work page

Show all 48 references
  1. [7]

    High-temperature expansion The thermal expectation values considered in the main text may be expressed with respect to the following func- tions: hn(y)= 1 Γ(n) ∫ dx xn−1 √ x2+y 2 1 e √ x2+y2 −1 ,(A5) whose properties are thoroughly addressed in Ref. [27]. Knowing the small-yex...

  2. [8]

    Global Λ hyperon polar- ization in nuclear collisions: evidence for the most vor- tical fluid,

    L. Adamczyket al.(STAR), “Global Λ hyperon polar- ization in nuclear collisions: evidence for the most vor- tical fluid,” Nature548, 62–65 (2017), arXiv:1701.06657 [nucl-ex]

    2017 arXiv

  3. [9]

    Itzykson and J

    C. Itzykson and J. B. Zuber,Quantum Field Theory, In- ternational Series In Pure and Applied Physics (McGraw- Hill, New York, 1980)

    1980

  4. [10]

    Peskin and Daniel V

    Michael E. Peskin and Daniel V. Schroeder,An Introduc- tion to quantum field theory(Addison-Wesley, Reading, USA, 1995)

    1995

  5. [11]

    Quark matter under rotation in the NJL model with vector interaction,

    Xinyang Wang, Minghua Wei, Zhibin Li, and Mei Huang, “Quark matter under rotation in the NJL model with vector interaction,” Phys. Rev. D99, 016018 (2019), arXiv:1808.01931 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  6. [12]

    On the origin of mixed inhomogeneous phase in vortical gluon plasma,

    V. V. Braguta, M. N. Chernodub, Ya. A. Gershtein, and A. A. Roenko, “On the origin of mixed inhomogeneous phase in vortical gluon plasma,” JHEP09, 079 (2025), arXiv:2411.15085 [hep-lat]

    2025 arXiv

  7. [13]

    Neg- ative Barnett effect, negative moment of inertia of the gluon plasma, and thermal evaporation of the chromo- magnetic condensate,

    Victor V. Braguta, Maxim N. Chernodub, Ilya E. Ku- drov, Artem A. Roenko, and Dmitrii A. Sychev, “Neg- ative Barnett effect, negative moment of inertia of the gluon plasma, and thermal evaporation of the chromo- magnetic condensate,” Phys. Rev. D110, 014511 (2024), arXiv:2310....

    2024 arXiv

  8. [14]

    On the angular momen- 15 tum and free energy of rotating gluon plasma,

    V. Braguta, M. Chernodub, E. Eremeev, I. Kudrov, A. Roenko, and D. Sychev, “On the angular momen- 15 tum and free energy of rotating gluon plasma,” (2025) arXiv:2512.04070 [hep-lat]

    2025

  9. [15]

    Pairing Phase Transitions of Matter under Rotation,

    Yin Jiang and Jinfeng Liao, “Pairing Phase Transitions of Matter under Rotation,” Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 192302 (2016), arXiv:1606.03808 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  10. [16]

    Interacting fermions in rotation: chiral symmetry restoration, mo- ment of inertia and thermodynamics,

    M. N. Chernodub and Shinya Gongyo, “Interacting fermions in rotation: chiral symmetry restoration, mo- ment of inertia and thermodynamics,” JHEP01, 136 (2017), arXiv:1611.02598 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  11. [17]

    Effects of ro- tation and boundaries on chiral symmetry breaking of relativistic fermions,

    M. N. Chernodub and Shinya Gongyo, “Effects of ro- tation and boundaries on chiral symmetry breaking of relativistic fermions,” Phys. Rev. D95, 096006 (2017), arXiv:1702.08266 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  12. [18]

    Per- turbative Confinement in Thermal Yang-Mills Theories Induced by Imaginary Angular Velocity,

    Shi Chen, Kenji Fukushima, and Yusuke Shimada, “Per- turbative Confinement in Thermal Yang-Mills Theories Induced by Imaginary Angular Velocity,” Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 242002 (2022), arXiv:2207.12665 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  13. [19]

    Susceptibil- ities of rotating quark matter in Fourier-Bessel basis,

    Mamiya Kawaguchi and Kazuya Mameda, “Susceptibil- ities of rotating quark matter in Fourier-Bessel basis,” JHEP11, 170 (2025), arXiv:2507.00494 [hep-ph]

    2025

  14. [20]

    Quark-meson model under rotation: A functional renor- malization group study,

    Hao-Lei Chen, Zhi-Bin Zhu, and Xu-Guang Huang, “Quark-meson model under rotation: A functional renor- malization group study,” Phys. Rev. D108, 054006 (2023), arXiv:2306.08362 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  15. [21]

    Vortical effects and the critical end point in the linear sigma model coupled to quark,

    Luis A. Hern´ andez and R. Zamora, “Vortical effects and the critical end point in the linear sigma model coupled to quark,” Phys. Rev. D111, 036003 (2025), arXiv:2410.17874 [hep-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  16. [22]

    Inhibition of the splitting of the chiral and deconfinement transition due to rotation in QCD: The phase diagram of the linear sigma model coupled to Polyakov loops,

    Pracheta Singha, Victor E. Ambrus, and Maxim N. Chernodub, “Inhibition of the splitting of the chiral and deconfinement transition due to rotation in QCD: The phase diagram of the linear sigma model coupled to Polyakov loops,” Phys. Rev. D110, 094053 (2024), arXiv:2407.07828 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  17. [23]

    Linear sigma model with quarks and Polyakov loop in rotation: Phase diagrams, Tolman- Ehrenfest law, and mechanical properties,

    Pracheta Singha, Sergiu Busuioc, Victor E. Ambrus, and Maxim N. Chernodub, “Linear sigma model with quarks and Polyakov loop in rotation: Phase diagrams, Tolman- Ehrenfest law, and mechanical properties,” Phys. Rev. D 112, 094031 (2025), arXiv:2503.17291 [nucl-th]

    2025 arXiv

  18. [24]

    Deconfining Phase Boundary of Rapidly Rotating Hot and Dense Matter and Analysis of Moment of Iner- tia,

    Yuki Fujimoto, Kenji Fukushima, and Yoshimasa Hi- daka, “Deconfining Phase Boundary of Rapidly Rotating Hot and Dense Matter and Analysis of Moment of Iner- tia,” Phys. Lett. B816, 136184 (2021), arXiv:2101.09173 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  19. [25]

    Dirac fermions under imaginary rotation,

    Tudor P˘ atuleanu, Amalia Dariana Fodor, Victor E. Am- brus, and Cosmin Crucean, “Dirac fermions under imaginary rotation,” Phys. Rev. D111, 116004 (2025), arXiv:2502.09738 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  20. [27]

    In- homogeneous confinement and chiral symmetry breaking induced by imaginary angular velocity,

    Shi Chen, Kenji Fukushima, and Yusuke Shimada, “In- homogeneous confinement and chiral symmetry breaking induced by imaginary angular velocity,” Phys. Lett. B 859, 139107 (2024), arXiv:2404.00965 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Confinement-deconfinement temperature for a rotating quark-gluon plasma,

    Nelson R. F. Braga, Luiz F. Faulhaber, and Octavio C. Junqueira, “Confinement-deconfinement temperature for a rotating quark-gluon plasma,” Phys. Rev. D105, 106003 (2022), arXiv:2201.05581 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Gluodynamics and deconfinement phase tran- sition under rotation from holography,

    Xun Chen, Lin Zhang, Danning Li, Defu Hou, and Mei Huang, “Gluodynamics and deconfinement phase tran- sition under rotation from holography,” JHEP07, 132 (2021), arXiv:2010.14478 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Importance of asymptotic freedom for the pseu- docritical temperature in magnetized quark matter,

    R. L. S. Farias, K. P. Gomes, G. I. Krein, and M. B. Pinto, “Importance of asymptotic freedom for the pseu- docritical temperature in magnetized quark matter,” Phys. Rev. C90, 025203 (2014), arXiv:1404.3931 [hep- ph]

    2014 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Rigidly rotating scalar fields: Between real divergence and imag- inary fractalization,

    Victor E. Ambru¸ s and Maxim N. Chernodub, “Rigidly rotating scalar fields: Between real divergence and imag- inary fractalization,” Phys. Rev. D108, 085016 (2023), arXiv:2304.05998 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Thermodynamic properties of a relativistic Bose gas under rigid rotation,

    E. Siri and N. Sadooghi, “Thermodynamic properties of a relativistic Bose gas under rigid rotation,” Phys. Rev. D110, 036016 (2024), arXiv:2405.09481 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Kapusta and Charles Gale,Finite-Temperature Field Theory : Principles and Applications, 2nd edition (Cambridge University Press, 2007)

    Joseph I. Kapusta and Charles Gale,Finite-Temperature Field Theory : Principles and Applications, 2nd edition (Cambridge University Press, 2007)

    2007

  27. [35]

    The Rotating quantum thermal distribution,

    Gavin Duffy and Adrian C. Ottewill, “The Rotating quantum thermal distribution,” Phys. Rev. D67, 044002 (2003), arXiv:hep-th/0211096

    2003 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Rotating fermions inside a cylindrical boundary,

    Victor E. Ambrus and Elizabeth Winstanley, “Rotating fermions inside a cylindrical boundary,” Phys. Rev. D 93, 104014 (2016), arXiv:1512.05239 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Perturbation the- ory of rotating scalar fields and vacuum insensitiv- ity to rotation,

    Ryo Kuboniwa and Kazuya Mameda, “Perturbation the- ory of rotating scalar fields and vacuum insensitiv- ity to rotation,” Phys. Lett. B872, 140089 (2026), arXiv:2504.04712 [hep-th]

    2026

  30. [38]

    Analogy between rotation and density for Dirac fermions in a magnetic field,

    Hao-Lei Chen, Kenji Fukushima, Xu-Guang Huang, and Kazuya Mameda, “Analogy between rotation and density for Dirac fermions in a magnetic field,” Phys. Rev. D93, 104052 (2016), arXiv:1512.08974 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Fejos,Resummed perturbative series of scalar quan- tum field theories in two-particle-irreducible formalism, Ph.D

    G. Fejos,Resummed perturbative series of scalar quan- tum field theories in two-particle-irreducible formalism, Ph.D. thesis, Eotvos U., Dept. Atomic Phys. (2011), arXiv:1112.0973 [hep-ph]

    2011 arXiv

  32. [40]

    The Equation of state for dense QCD and quark stars,

    Jens O. Andersen and Michael Strickland, “The Equation of state for dense QCD and quark stars,” Phys. Rev. D 66, 105001 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0206196

    2002 arXiv

  33. [41]

    925 (Springer, 2016) arXiv:1701.01554 [hep-ph]

    Mikko Laine and Aleksi Vuorinen,Basics of Thermal Field Theory, Vol. 925 (Springer, 2016) arXiv:1701.01554 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Ap- proximately selfconsistent resummations for the thermo- dynamics of the quark gluon plasma. 1. Entropy and density,

    J. P. Blaizot, Edmond Iancu, and A. Rebhan, “Ap- proximately selfconsistent resummations for the thermo- dynamics of the quark gluon plasma. 1. Entropy and density,” Phys. Rev. D63, 065003 (2001), arXiv:hep- ph/0005003

    2001

  35. [43]

    Thermal effective potential of the O(N) linear sigma model,

    Giovanni Amelino-Camelia, “Thermal effective potential of the O(N) linear sigma model,” Phys. Lett. B407, 268– 274 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9702403

    1997 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Hard thermal loop resummed pressure of a degenerate quark gluon plasma,

    Rudolf Baier and Krzysztof Redlich, “Hard thermal loop resummed pressure of a degenerate quark gluon plasma,” Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 2100–2103 (2000), arXiv:hep- ph/9908372

    2000

  37. [45]

    Equation of state of cold and dense QCD matter in resummed per- turbation theory,

    Yuki Fujimoto and Kenji Fukushima, “Equation of state of cold and dense QCD matter in resummed per- turbation theory,” Phys. Rev. D105, 014025 (2022), arXiv:2011.10891 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Michel Le Bellac,Thermal Field Theory, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 2011)

    2011

  39. [47]

    F. W. J Olver, D. W. Lozier, R. F. Boisvert, and C. W. 16 Clark,NIST handbook of mathematical functions(Cam- bridge University Press, New York, NY, 2010)

    2010

  40. [48]

    On the LambertW function,

    R. M. Corless, G. H. Gonnet, D. E. G. Hare, D. J. Jeffrey, and D. E. Knuth, “On the LambertW function,” Adv. Comput. Math.5, 329–359 (1996)

    1996

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.