Pith. Sign in

REVIEW

The Mass Function of Neutron Stars from Core-Collapse Supernova Simulations

High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena · Submitted 18 Aug 2026 · 299 references

Pith's verdict: A transparent but partly circular attempt to derive the neutron star mass function from 3D supernova simulations; worth refereeing, but the 'prediction' is heavily fitted and the scatter-free mapping likely creates artificial sharp features.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (deepseek-v4-flash) read the paper on August 27, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

  1. T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
  2. T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
  3. T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
  4. T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
  5. T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 4 major objections · 5 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →
Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2608.18198 (version 1)
Pith IDGO43HG6Q, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAdam Burrows, Anthony Fisher, David Vartanyan, James Burry, Waly M Z Karim. "The Mass Function of Neutron Stars from Core-Collapse Supernova Simulations." arXiv:2608.18198 (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GO43HG6Q
Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper
Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Referee report
The paper

The paper claims

The paper claims that modern 3D core-collapse supernova theory can explain the observed neutron star mass function, from the ~1.35 $M_\odot$ peak to the high-mass tail, and yields a ~21% black hole birth fraction.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that modern three-dimensional core-collapse supernova theory can predict the distribution of neutron star masses at birth, and that this theoretical distribution matches the masses observed in binary systems. The argument chains three ingredients: the initial stellar mass function, a mapping from zero-age main-sequence mass to the compactness of the pre-collapse core, and a mapping from compactness to the gravitational birth mass of the remnant derived from 3D simulations. Weighted by a Salpeter initial mass function, the chain yields a theoretical birth function with a peak at $1.2$\textendash$1.3\,M_\odot$, a secondary enhancement near $1.5$\textendash$1.7\,M_\odot$, and a sharp upper cutoff near $2.0\,M_\odot$. The paper then shows that masking the islands of black hole formation, correcting observed masses for post-birth accretion, and removing a fraction of higher-mass remnants through stronger natal kicks brings this birth function into agreement with the accretion-corrected observations, including the observed peak near $1.35\,M_\odot$ and the high-mass tail. If the calculation is right, the measured neutron star mass function is a direct imprint of explosion physics, not merely a narrow birth mass broadened by accretion.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the compactness parameter $\xi_M = (M/M_\odot)/(R(M)/1000\,{\rm km})$, evaluated at $M=1.75\,M_\odot$, which measures how tightly bound the pre-collapse core is. A polynomial fit to the 3D simulation suite converts $\xi_{1.75}$ into a gravitational birth mass $M_{\rm birth}$ for each progenitor, and this is combined with a separate $\xi_{1.75}$-versus-$M_{\rm ZAMS}$ relation from stellar evolution models and a Salpeter IMF $dN/dM \propto M^{-2.35}$ to assign weights to discrete birth-mass points. On the observational side, black-hole-forming progenitor islands defined in a companion 3D study are masked with fitted removal fractions, accretion corrections from spin-period relations shift observed masses downward, and a simple kick-depletion step removes a fraction of remnants above $1.5\,M_\odot$. The machinery turns progenitor structure into a testable mass function through two deterministic mappings plus two fitted selection effects.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, stated on the paper's own terms, is that the neutron star mass function observed in binaries is a convolution of a broad spectrum of birth masses with three physical filters: black hole formation in islands of progenitor compactness, post-birth accretion from a companion, and mass-dependent natal kicks. The default theoretical birth function, built from the $\xi_{1.75}$-to-$M_{\rm birth}$ mapping, peaks at $1.2$\textendash$1.3\,M_\odot$ and has a secondary enhancement at $1.5$\textendash$1.7\,M_\odot$, overproducing the intermediate- and high-mass ranges relative to observation. Applying the best-fitting black-hole masks removes about $20.7\%$ of progenitors in the $9$\textendash$120\,M_\odot$ range (Salpeter-weighted), and a phenomenological removal of half the remnants between $1.5$ and $2.0\,M_\odot$ as a natal-kick selection yields a final distribution that broadly reproduces the accretion-corrected observed masses from the $1.35\,M_\odot$ peak to the tail. The paper also argues that the sharp low-mass cutoff near $1.2\,M_\odot$ is physical: observed claims of neutron stars below roughly $1.1\,M_\odot$ are attributed to measurement error, and the scarcity of objects below $1.2\,M_\odot$ motivates a reduced neutron-star formation efficiency in the $8$\textendash$9\,M_\odot$ progenitor range.

Load-bearing premise

The entire calculation rests on the assumption that a core's compactness $\xi_{1.75}$ uniquely determines the neutron star's gravitational birth mass through a deterministic fit with no scatter, along with the companion assumption that the stellar-evolution mapping from $M_{\rm ZAMS}$ to $\xi_{1.75}$ is representative.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The observed peak near $1.35\,M_\odot$ is, in this picture, partly a selection effect: lower-mass neutron stars receive weaker kicks and preferentially survive in binaries, while heavier remnants are more often unbound.
  • Black hole formation is not monotonic in ZAMS mass; the islands of high compactness that collapse to black holes remove about $21\%$ of the $9$\textendash$120\,M_\odot$ progenitor population, so the neutron-star/black-hole dichotomy has a patchy, structure-dependent origin.
  • The theoretical minimum neutron star birth mass is near $1.15$\textendash$1.2\,M_\odot$, which predicts that supposedly sub-$1.1\,M_\odot$ neutron stars are measurement artifacts and that neutron-star formation is suppressed in part of the $8$\textendash$9\,M_\odot$ range.
  • Because the mapping is deterministic, the sharp features of the birth function (the dominant low-mass peak and the $2.0\,M_\odot$ cutoff) are directly testable predictions for future, less biased samples of neutron star masses.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension is to replace the Salpeter ZAMS weighting with a distribution of carbon-oxygen core masses from binary population synthesis; the paper notes multiplicity is ubiquitous, and this substitution could shift the low-mass peak without changing the compactness-to-mass mapping.
  • If future 3D suites reveal even modest scatter in birth mass at fixed $\xi_{1.75}$, the sharp cutoff and narrow peaks in the theoretical distribution would smear; calibrating the scatter is the quickest way to judge how much of the claimed shape is robust.
  • The fitted black hole fraction of about $21\%$ has an implicit consequence the paper does not develop: it implies a local birth rate of stellar-mass black holes that could be compared with gravitational-wave merger-rate inferences, once delay times and selection are folded in.
  • The kick-depletion step is intentionally phenomenological; a self-consistent population synthesis using simulation-calibrated kick distributions would test whether removing half of the remnants above $1.5\,M_\odot$ is realistic or an artifact of the simplified treatment.
Original abstract

Using the mapping between progenitor core structure and the gravitational mass of neutron stars derived from sophisticated 3D supernova simulations, we determine the theoretical mass distribution of neutron stars at birth and compare it with neutron star mass function measurements. In the process, we explore the effects of islands of black hole formation and subsequent mass accretion. We show that supernova theory can explain the observed neutron star mass function from its lower-mass peak near $\sim$1.35 $M_{\odot}$ to its higher-mass tail. Moreover, the lower predicted kick speeds expected during the birth of lower-mass neutron stars and the higher expected kick speeds expected on average for higher mass neutron stars both sculpt the observed mass function in desired directions. The upshot of all these influences is to imprint upon the measured neutron star mass function features that reflect the varied physics of both neutron star origins and the neutron-star/black-hole dichotomy. Very approximately, we derive a black hole birth fraction of $\sim$21\%. In summary, we suggest that supernova theory can now be used to explain, however provisionally, various measured attributes of the population of compact objects and that an era of productive engagement between supernova theory and observation is at hand.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,734 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.91 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.09 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.98 · compares with prior results 0.82 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Using the mapping between progenitor core structure and the gravitational mass of neutron stars derived from sophisticated 3D supernova simulations, we determine the theoretical mass distribution of neutron stars at birth and compare it with neutron star mass function measurements. In the process, we explore the effects of islands of black hole formation and subsequent mass accretion. We show that supernova theory can explain the observed neutron star mass function from its lower-mass peak near $\sim$1.35 $M_{\odot}$ to its higher-mass tail. Moreover, the lower predicted kick speeds expected during the birth of lower-mass neutron stars and the higher expected kick speeds expected on average for higher mass neutron stars both sculpt the observed mass function in desired directions. The upshot of all these influences is to imprint upon the measured neutron star mass function features that reflect the varied physics of both neutron star origins and the neutron-star/black-hole dichotomy. Very approximately, we derive a black hole birth fraction of $\sim$21\%. In summary, we suggest that supernova theory can now be used to explain, however provisionally, various measured attributes of the population of compact objects and that an era of productive engagement between supernova theory and observation is at hand.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Using the mapping between progenitor core structure and the gravitational mass of neutron stars derived from sophisticated 3D supernova simulations, we determine the theoretical mass distribution of neutron stars at birth and compare it with neutron star mass function measurements. contribution 0.72 0.94 0.11 asserted 0.98
s1 In the process, we explore the effects of islands of black hole formation and subsequent mass accretion. method 0.54 0.82 0.02 asserted 0.67
s2 We show that supernova theory can explain the observed neutron star mass function from its lower-mass peak near $\sim$1.35 $M_{\odot}$ to its higher-mass tail. result 0.99 0.92 0.74 asserted 1.00
s3 Moreover, the lower predicted kick speeds expected during the birth of lower-mass neutron stars and the higher expected kick speeds expected on average for higher mass neutron stars both sculpt the observed mass function in desired directions. interpretation 0.64 0.78 0.09 asserted 0.98
s4 The upshot of all these influences is to imprint upon the measured neutron star mass function features that reflect the varied physics of both neutron star origins and the neutron-star/black-hole dichotomy. interpretation 0.97 0.75 0.17 asserted 0.99
s5 Very approximately, we derive a black hole birth fraction of $\sim$21\%. result 1.00 0.95 0.06 asserted 0.59
s6 In summary, we suggest that supernova theory can now be used to explain, however provisionally, various measured attributes of the population of compact objects and that an era of productive engagement between supernova theory and observation is at hand. future work 0.51 0.42 0.50 hedged possibility 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: simulation study 0.96 · evidence from simulation or computation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

Figures
Figure 1. Observed neutron star binary data for objects between 1.0 and 2.4 M⊙, grouped by subpopulation type. Left: Stacked histogram with bars colored according to the proportion accounted for by each subpopulation. Right: Violin plot showing the distribution per subpopulation. Observed data points are shown at the center of each violin; the widths correspond to a summed Gaussian kernel over the data points. The subpopulations are shown on the x-axis. Note that the NS-NS subpopulation is weighted at the low-mass end. This feature is explained in Burrows et al. (2023) as a result of the…
Figure 2. Inferred neutron star mass distributions from the literature, including both unimodal and bimodal Gaus￾sian models. Sources are Zhang et al. (2011), Ozel et al. ¨ (2012), Antoniadis et al. (2016), Alsing et al. (2018), Rocha et al. (2019), Fan et al. (2024a), Das et al. (2024), and Schiebelbein-Zwack et al. (2025). Legend labels indicate the neutron star subpopulation used in each study; Antoniadis et al. and Rocha et al. each appear twice because both a uni￾modal and bimodal fit were derived for the full population. with those derived by others discussed below, is plotted in
Figure 3. A representative polynomial fit for the compactness-gravitational mapping. While linear, quadratic, and even cubic models were considered, the polynomial fit’s curvature best captures the variation in the mass-compactness mapping. The data points for this mapping can be found in
Figure 4. We note that the progenitor-to-remnant relation alone requires an IMF to provide an estimate of the number of stars for any given ZAMs mass range. In our baseline calculations, we therefore weight the progenitor side us￾ing an initial mass function: for instance, the Salpeter
Figure 5. Approximate locations of the four channels of black hole forming regions in the MZAMS vs. ξ1.75 plane according to Burrows et al. (2025). The low-mass component of channel 1 is in orange, and the high-mass component is in green. Channel 2 is in red, channel 3 in violet, and channel 4 is in black. See text for a discussion. In order to incorporate the effect of black hole for￾mation on the neutron star birth function, we mask a fraction of the progenitors in the MZAMS − ξ1.75 plane for various progenitor intervals. These progenitor inter￾vals, also known as black hole forming…
Figure 6. The default theoretical birth mass function for neutron stars calculated using the method in §3. Each bin in this colored histogram is color-coded as a function of birth mass according to the color map on the right. The observed mass distribution of all 146 neutron stars is shown in the solid black line, and the same for 104 neutron stars with pe￾riod measurements is shown in the dashed black line. All histograms are binned with a 0.1M⊙ bin width. The bottom panel shows the MZAMS vs. ξ1.75 relation, where each point is color coded according to the mass bin to which it contributes in…
Figure 7. An example of the black-hole masking effect on the theoretical neutron-star birth-mass function. Panels (a)–(d) vary the masking fraction, fBH, within the Chan￾nel 1 low-mass, Channel 1 high-mass, Channel 2, and Chan￾nel 4 black-hole-forming regions identified by Burrows et al. (2025), respectively. The colored step curves correspond to the values of fBH indicated in the legend. In each panel, the solid black curve shows the uncorrected mass distribution of all 146 observed neutron stars, while the black dash-dotted curve shows the corresponding distribution for the 104 sys￾tems…
Figure 8. Effect of accretion correction on the observed neutron-star mass distribution using the prescriptions of Zhang et al. (2011) and You et al. (2025). The solid black curve shows the uncorrected mass distribution of all 146 ob￾served neutron stars, while the dashed black curve shows the uncorrected distribution of the 104 systems with measured spin periods. The accretion-corrected distributions obtained using Zhang et al. (2011) and You et al. (2025) are shown by the red dotted and green dash-dotted curves, respectively. All distributions are constructed using a bin width of 0.1 M⊙.…
Figure 9. shows the theoretical neutron-star birth-mass function obtained after masking progenitors associated with the black hole formation channels from Burrows et al. (2025). The masking fractions were determined us￾ing the maximum-likelihood procedure described at the end of §3.1 to obtain the closest agreement with the ob￾served neutron-star mass distribution after applying the accretion correction of You et al. (2025). In the upper panel, the histogram represents the resulting black-hole￾masked theoretical birth function, with each bin color￾coded according to birth mass, as indicated…
Figure 10. Effect of natal kicks in the mass range between 1.5M⊙ and 2.0M⊙ on the theoretical neutron-star birth-mass function. Each colored curve shows the birth function after removing a specified fraction of remnants from the specified mass range, as indicated in the legend. The solid black curve shows the uncorrected observed neutron-star mass distribu￾tion of the 104 remnants with period measurements, while the black dash-dotted curve shows the distribution after ap￾plying the accretion correction of You et al. (2025). The comparison indicates that around 75% of the relevant rem￾nants…
Figure 11. presents the final theoretical neutron-star birth-mass function obtained by combining the best-fit black-hole masking prescription with a phenomenolog￾ical correction for natal neutron-star kicks. In the up￾per panel, the histogram shows the corrected theoreti￾cal birth function, with each bin color-coded according to neutron-star birth mass, as indicated by the color bar. The observed neutron-star mass distribution, cor￾rected for accretion using the prescription of You et al. (2025), is shown by the dashed black curve. The lower panel displays the relation between MZAMS and ξ1.75…

Figures reproduced from arXiv:2608.18198 by the authors.

References
How the literature uses it

2 arXiv papers cite this in 2 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 1 sentence without a confident label

Cites it as background 1 paper

What it cites · 68 sentences without a confident label

Contests 1 paper
Uses the method or tool of 1 paper
Uses data or values from 3 papers
Compares with 2 papers
Cites as support 3 papers
  • In particular, and what motivates this paper is the suggestion in [ref] that there could be a monotonic relationship between the gravitational mass ($M_G$) of a neutron star birthed in a core-collapse supernova explosion and the final core structure of the progenitor massive star, in particular its “compactness" [ref] (see [ref] and Table [ref]).

    Black Hole Formation in Failing Core-Collapse Supernovae · Introduction · 1.00

  • In particular, and what motivates this paper is the suggestion in [ref] that there could be a monotonic relationship between the gravitational mass ($M_G$) of a neutron star birthed in a core-collapse supernova explosion and the final core structure of the progenitor massive star, in particular its “compactness" [ref] (see [ref] and Table [ref]).

    Physical Correlations and Predictions Emerging from Modern Core-Collapse Supernova Theory · Introduction · 1.00

  • Importantly, black hole formation may not be monotonic with ZAMS mass $-$ there may be islands of black hole formation, some accompanied by supernova explosions [ref] .

    Channels of Stellar-mass Black Hole Formation · Conclusions · 0.97

Cites as background 18 papers

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.