Pith. Sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Calculation of neutron electric dipole moment from Lattice QCD

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-27 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Record Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON Record JSON

Pith's one-line read A lattice QCD calculation extracts the theta-induced neutron electric dipole moment and sets theta-bar around 1e-11.

desk verdict A genuinely new lattice method for the theta-term nEDM with a statistically significant central value, but the electro-quenched background field and the absent continuum limit mean the number is not yet a controlled prediction. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.22587 v1 pith:VMAII4PF submitted 2026-08-23 hep-lat hep-exhep-ph

Thomas Blum , Fangcheng He , Taku Izubuchi , Luchang Jin , Hiroshi Ohki , Sergey Syritsyn This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-lathep-exhep-ph PACS 12.38.Gc14.20.Dh11.30.Er
keywords neutronelectricdipolemomentstrongCPproblemthetatermlatticeQCDbackgroundfieldFeynman-HellmanntheoremtopologicalchargevariationalGEVP
topics The Strong CP Problem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports a lattice QCD calculation of the neutron electric dipole moment (nEDM) induced by the QCD $\theta$ term. It claims to extract a statistically significant signal from the local density of topological charge in a background electric field, using variational parity-mixed nucleon states, and to obtain $d_n/\bar{\theta} = -0.0050(4)(8)\,e\cdot\mathrm{fm}$ after chiral extrapolation. If that value is right, the current experimental nEDM bound translates into $|\bar{\theta}| \lesssim 10^{-11}$, sharpening the strong-CP problem. The method avoids the $Q^2\to 0$ extrapolation and the noisy global topological-charge sums used in earlier form-factor determinations.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing objects are the local topological charge density $q_{\mathrm{top}}(t)=\int d^3x\, G_{\mu\nu}\tilde{G}_{\mu\nu}/(32\pi^2)$ at one Euclidean time slice, regulated by gradient flow; the background electric field $E_z$ obeying 't Hooft quantization, whose anti-Hermitian dipole term $\Delta H=iE_z D_z$ breaks parity; and the left and right ground-state eigenvectors obtained from a GEVP built from parity-projected nucleon interpolating operators. The Feynman-Hellmann relation $\partial E^{\uparrow}_N/\partial\bar{\theta} = i\langle N^L|q_{\mathrm{top}}(0)|N^R\rangle$ converts the linear energy shift into the EDM, removing the need for a $Q^2\to 0$ extrapolation and separating the electric dipole form factor from the Pauli form factor contamination.

What would settle it

Run the same background-field calculation on the same ensembles with the electric field coupled to the dynamical sea quarks and check whether $d_n/\bar{\theta}$ stays within $\pm 0.0008\,e\cdot\mathrm{fm}$ of $-0.0050$; a larger shift would invalidate the quoted physical value.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the $\theta$-induced nEDM can be computed as a Feynman-Hellmann response: $d_n/\bar{\theta} = (1/E_z)\langle N^L| q_{\mathrm{top}}(0) |N^R\rangle_{E_z}$. The uniform Euclidean background electric field makes the dipole interaction anti-Hermitian, so the nucleon ground state is a parity-mixed state of a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian; the paper constructs its left and right eigenstates with a generalized eigenvalue problem in a basis of positive- and negative-parity nucleon interpolating operators. The topological charge operator is sampled at a single time slice and regulated by gradient flow, which replaces the global volume sum of earlier approaches. On three 2+1-flavor domain-wall-fermion ensembles with pion masses 340, 420, and 576 MeV and lattice spacing about 0.11 fm, the signal is nonzero, stable against electric-field strength, and the chiral extrapolation gives $d_n/\bar{\theta} = -0.0050(4)(8)\,e\cdot\mathrm{fm}$.

Load-bearing premise

The physical prediction assumes that the 'electro-quenched' approximation, in which only valence quarks feel the background electric field, changes the neutron EDM by a negligible amount, and the paper gives no estimate of that bias.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The theta-term nEDM can be extracted without summing global topological charge over the whole lattice volume, removing the truncation systematics of earlier $F_3$ form-factor methods.
  • Because the signal is obtained from local topological charge in parity-mixed variational states, the same machinery transfers directly to Weinberg three-gluon and isosinglet four-quark CP-violating operators.
  • The physical-point value $d_n/\bar{\theta}=-0.0050(4)(8)\,e\cdot\mathrm{fm}$, combined with the experimental nEDM bound, gives $|\bar{\theta}|\lesssim 10^{-11}$, which the paper interprets as confirming the strong-CP problem.
  • The results from electric field strengths $|n_z|=1$ and $|n_z|=2$ agree, showing that the linear-response regime is under control and higher-order field corrections are negligible.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the electro-quenched approximation shifts the result by more than the quoted systematic error, the physical value changes; a direct computation with sea-quark couplings to the background field would settle this.
  • Because the discrepancy with earlier form-factor results grows toward lighter pion masses, an independent measurement on finer and larger lattices at $m_\pi\approx 340$ MeV could distinguish method-specific excited-state contamination from real physics.
  • The local-density approach should also improve signals for other CP-violating operators whose lattice correlators suffer from global volume summation, a direct extension the paper already names.
  • If forthcoming experiments reach $d_n\sim 3\times 10^{-28}\,e\cdot\mathrm{cm}$, the same $d_n/\bar{\theta}$ would tighten the theta-angle bound by two orders of magnitude.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by jev-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,507 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.50 · states limitation 0.14 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.06 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.55 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Experimental constraints on the neutron electric dipole moment (nEDM) may imply strong-CP problem in QCD, or unnatural smallness of the QCD theta angle. In this work, we present a novel determination of the neutron electric dipole moment (nEDM) $d_n$ sensitivity to theta term from nonperturbative QCD on a lattice with background electric field. Using Feynman-Hellmann theorem, we compute nEDM from the matrix element of local topological charge density between nucleon ground states spatially polarized by an electric field. These states have mixed spatial parity, and we construct them using variational analysis. We obtain statistically significant signal for the theta induced nEDM from lattices with 2+1 dynamical domain wall fermions corresponding to pion masses of 340, 420, and 576 MeV and lattice spacing $a\approx 0.11~\text{fm}$. After extrapolating to the physical point, we obtain $d_n=-0.0050(4)(8)\bar{\theta}$ e$\cdot$fm. Comparison with the current experimental bound on nEDM implies constraint $|\bar{\theta}|\lesssim 10^{-11}$, which confirms existence of the strong-CP problem in QCD. Our pioneering work demonstrates that neutron EDM can be reliably determined from the local density of topological charge with robust control of systematic effects, and can be directly extended to other CP-violating interactions.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What Jev reports for each sentence. The number is the probability Jev gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Experimental constraints on the neutron electric dipole moment (nEDM) may imply strong-CP problem in QCD, or unnatural smallness of the QCD theta angle. background 0.99 0.05 0.06 hedged possibility 1.00
s1 In this work, we present a novel determination of the neutron electric dipole moment (nEDM) $d_n$ sensitivity to theta term from nonperturbative QCD on a lattice with background electric field. contribution 1.00 0.94 0.06 asserted 0.99
s2 Using Feynman-Hellmann theorem, we compute nEDM from the matrix element of local topological charge density between nucleon ground states spatially polarized by an electric field. method 0.99 0.95 0.03 asserted 1.00
s3 These states have mixed spatial parity, and we construct them using variational analysis. method 0.99 0.91 0.02 asserted 1.00
s4 We obtain statistically significant signal for the theta induced nEDM from lattices with 2+1 dynamical domain wall fermions corresponding to pion masses of 340, 420, and 576 MeV and lattice spacing $a\approx 0.11~\text{fm}$. result 0.67 0.96 0.07 asserted 1.00
s5 After extrapolating to the physical point, we obtain $d_n=-0.0050(4)(8)\bar{\theta}$ e$\cdot$fm. result 1.00 0.97 0.65 asserted 1.00
s6 Comparison with the current experimental bound on nEDM implies constraint $|\bar{\theta}|\lesssim 10^{-11}$, which confirms existence of the strong-CP problem in QCD. interpretation 0.97 0.76 0.70 asserted 0.95
s7 Our pioneering work demonstrates that neutron EDM can be reliably determined from the local density of topological charge with robust control of systematic effects, and can be directly extended to other CP-violating interactions. contribution 0.48 0.84 0.21 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper Jev reports this is: simulation study 0.99 · evidence from simulation or computation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Request a human review

A listed scientist reviews the paper for a fee and the review publishes here regardless of verdict. See the reviewers or get listed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor
the referee's summary of the paper

The paper presents a lattice QCD calculation of the theta-bar-induced neutron electric dipole moment using an external electric field background, the Feynman-Hellmann theorem, and the matrix element of the local topological charge density in a nucleon ground state that is spatially polarized by the background field. The ground state is constructed with a GEVP in a parity-mixed basis of nucleon interpolating operators. Using 2+1-flavor domain-wall fermion ensembles at a single lattice spacing a≈0.11 fm and pion masses 340, 420, and 576 MeV, the paper finds a statistically significant signal, extrapolates to the physical point with a two-parameter chiral ansatz, and quotes d_n/theta_bar = -0.0050(4)(8) e·fm as its central result. Comparing with the experimental nEDM bound gives |theta_bar| <= 1e-11, which the paper interprets as confirmation of the strong CP problem. The paper also compares with previous lattice determinations and argues that residual excited-state contamination explains the differences.

Significance. If the quoted result holds, the paper establishes a new and potentially more robust route to the theta-term nEDM: local topological charge sampling avoids the global topological-charge summation that has limited previous calculations, and no Q^2 to 0 form-factor extrapolation is needed. The internal consistency checks are a genuine strength: results are stable under the electric-field strength (n_z=1 versus 2), over a range of gradient-flow times, across several nucleon interpolating operators, and under variation of the GEVP reference time. The physical prediction, however, currently rests on one lattice spacing, an electro-quenched background electric field, a three-point chiral extrapolation, and an error budget that is not internally consistent as written. The paper therefore represents a promising new method and a clear signal, but the quoted physical value is not yet a controlled prediction.

major comments (4)
  1. [Numerical Results, paragraph after Table I] The electro-quenched approximation is load-bearing but its bias is not estimated. Equation (6) defines the electric dipole operator D_z with a sum over all quark flavors, and Eq. (9) uses this operator to extract the nEDM that is then quoted as the physical d_n/theta_bar. By coupling only valence quarks to the background field, sea-quark and disconnected contributions to the energy shift are omitted. For a neutral hadron there is no charge-cancellation argument that suppresses these contributions: the EDM is a moment, not a total charge, and the quark charges differ. The final systematic budget and the Conclusions list finite-volume, discretization, and chiral-extrapolation effects but do not include a bias estimate for this approximation. The authors should either quantify the effect (for example, by a partially quenched comparison or by coupling sea quarks in a test ensemble) or explicitly present the central number as a valence-approximation result rather than as a physical prediction.
  2. [Numerical Results, error budget for d_n/theta_bar] The quoted total systematic uncertainty is not reproduced by the procedure described in the text. The paper states that the total systematic is the quadrature sum of the fit-region uncertainty, quoted as 0.004 e·fm for |n_z|=1, and the difference between the two |n_z| results, which is 0.0050-0.0043=0.0007 e·fm. That quadrature sum is approximately 0.004 e·fm, not the quoted 0.008 e·fm. Because the inferred bound |theta_bar| <= 1e-11 depends directly on the total uncertainty, the discrepancy must be resolved and the full error budget stated explicitly.
  3. [Numerical Results and Conclusions, continuum and chiral extrapolations] The physical-point value is obtained from a single lattice spacing, a≈0.11 fm (Table I), and from the two-parameter chiral ansatz in Eq. (18) fitted to only three pion masses, the lightest being 340 MeV. No continuum extrapolation is performed, no variation of the chiral fit form is reported, and no chi-squared per degree of freedom is given. The Conclusions acknowledge finite-volume and discretization effects, but the central claim is presented as a robust prediction with 'robust control of systematic effects'. An estimate of the O(a^2) discretization uncertainty and of the chiral-model uncertainty is necessary before the quoted central value can be regarded as a controlled physical result.
  4. [Numerical Results, comparison with previous lattice calculations] The central value d_n/theta_bar = -0.0050(4)(8) e·fm differs by roughly a factor of three from the two previous high-statistics lattice determinations at similar pion masses listed in Table II (Dragos et al. and Liang et al.). The paper attributes this to residual excited-state contamination in the form-factor method, and the internal cross-checks support the new method. However, the external tension is not resolved by a controlled comparison; it could also reflect differences in actions, lattice spacings, or the unquantified electro-quenched approximation. A quantitative discussion of this discrepancy is required to support the claim that the new method is more reliable than the existing determinations.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Conclusions] The Conclusions state that the result 'confirms the existence of the strong-CP problem' without repeating the caveats that the calculation uses one lattice spacing and the electro-quenched approximation; the abstract and conclusions should carry these caveats explicitly.
  2. [Numerical Results, GEVP reference time] The text states that results with t0=4a, 5a, and 6a are consistent, but no figure or table showing this comparison is included; a plot or table would support this stability claim.
  3. [Methodology, Eq. (18)] The chiral ansatz uses m_N,phy inside the logarithm, but the scale and the numerical value used are not defined; please specify the convention and the value employed.
  4. [Supplemental Material, gradient flow time dependence] The flowed topological charge density is used as the local q_top operator, but the paper does not discuss the renormalization or matching of the flowed operator to the physical theta-term; a brief comment on this point, even with a reference, would be useful.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No constructional circularity: the nEDM is extracted from an independent local-topological-charge correlator and extrapolated with a standard chiral ansatz; self-citations are technical and not load-bearing.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained rather than circular. The nEDM enters through the linear energy shift in Eq. (4), and the Feynman-Hellmann theorem (external Ref. [56]) relates the theta-derivative of the energy to the matrix element of the local topological charge density in Eq. (7). Combining these gives Eq. (9), and first-order non-Hermitian perturbation theory gives the Baluni-type sum in Eq. (10), which is compared with, not defined by, the external results in Refs. [57,58]. On the lattice, Eq. (14) is a ratio of a three-point function with a q_top insertion to a two-point function, so the extracted d_n is an independent observable rather than a refit of an input. The chiral extrapolation in Eq. (18) uses the standard chi-PT form from Refs. [20,65] fitted to three ensembles, and the physical-point value is compared with previous independent determinations in Table II. The electro-quenched approximation is a systematic assumption, not a constructional circularity: omitting sea-quark couplings to the background field does not force the central value, though it is an unquantified systematic risk. Self-citations to companion Ref. [52] supply technical lemmas such as the pseudo-Hermiticity of the GEVP correlator and the Euclidean sign of the topological charge density, but they do not contain or predetermine the nEDM result; the main identity is independently derived in the text and checked against Baluni. No prediction in the paper is equivalent by construction to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The final nEDM rests on three fitted or chosen inputs: two chiral fit coefficients and a gradient flow time choice, plus six domain assumptions, most notably the electro-quenched approximation and the implicit omission of continuum and infinite-volume limits. None of these assumptions is tested by independent data in this paper.

free parameters (3)
  • c0 = not reported
    Coefficient of m_pi^2 in the chiral extrapolation ansatz Eq. (18), fitted to the three pion-mass points; the physical-point nEDM depends on it.
  • c1 = not reported
    Coefficient of m_pi^2 log(m_pi^2/m_N^2) in Eq. (18), fitted to the three data points; no alternative chiral ansatz is tested.
  • gradient flow time t_gf = 4a^2
    Final flow time adopted after a scan; results are consistent across t_gf = 1, 2, 4, 8, so this is a procedural choice rather than a fitted constant.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Feynman-Hellmann theorem relates the theta-derivative of the nucleon energy to a local topological charge matrix element.
    Used in Eq. (7); the non-Hermitian extension and Euclidean continuation are delegated to companion paper [52].
  • domain assumption The Euclidean background electric field implements the analytic continuation E_M -> -iE and gives an anti-Hermitian dipole term Delta H = i E_z D_z.
    Eqs. (4)-(8) assume this continuation is valid at linear order in E_z and theta-bar.
  • domain assumption The electro-quenched approximation is valid for the nEDM.
    Only valence quarks couple to the background field; sea-quark contributions are omitted with no numerical estimate of the bias.
  • domain assumption The chiral extrapolation form d_n/theta = c0 m_pi^2 + c1 m_pi^2 log(m_pi^2/m_N^2) is valid from 340 MeV to the physical point.
    Eq. (18) is taken from ChPT; only three pion masses are used and no higher-order or alternative fit is reported.
  • domain assumption Gradient-flow topological charge at finite flow time is the correct local topological charge density.
    The paper uses q_top constructed from gradient flow and adopts t_gf = 4a^2 after a consistency scan.
  • domain assumption Finite-volume and discretization effects at 24^3 x 64, a = 0.11 fm, are negligible compared with quoted uncertainties.
    No continuum or infinite-volume extrapolation is performed; the Conclusions admit these are uncounted residual systematics.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Calculation of neutron electric dipole moment from Lattice QCD." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VMAII4PF

@misc{pith2026260822587,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Calculation of neutron electric dipole moment from Lattice QCD},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VMAII4PF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.22587}
}
abstract

Experimental constraints on the neutron electric dipole moment (nEDM) may imply strong-CP problem in QCD, or unnatural smallness of the QCD theta angle. In this work, we present a novel determination of the neutron electric dipole moment (nEDM) $d_n$ sensitivity to theta term from nonperturbative QCD on a lattice with background electric field. Using Feynman-Hellmann theorem, we compute nEDM from the matrix element of local topological charge density between nucleon ground states spatially polarized by an electric field. These states have mixed spatial parity, and we construct them using variational analysis. We obtain statistically significant signal for the theta induced nEDM from lattices with 2+1 dynamical domain wall fermions corresponding to pion masses of 340, 420, and 576 MeV and lattice spacing $a\approx 0.11~\text{fm}$. After extrapolating to the physical point, we obtain $d_n=-0.0050(4)(8)\bar{\theta}$ e$\cdot$fm. Comparison with the current experimental bound on nEDM implies constraint $|\bar{\theta}|\lesssim 10^{-11}$, which confirms existence of the strong-CP problem in QCD. Our pioneering work demonstrates that neutron EDM can be reliably determined from the local density of topological charge with robust control of systematic effects, and can be directly extended to other CP-violating interactions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.22587 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The ratio [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Comparison of lattice nEDM results. The red and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The EDM results obtained using the GEVP analysis Eq. (14) with different interpolating operators on ensemble 24I-005 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The effective masses of the ground and first excited states in the presence of electric field, obtained using different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The biorthogonal weights of the positive ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The results of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. The gradient flow time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Lattice QCD calculation of the pion-nucleon coupling $\bar{g}_0$ induced by the QCD $\Theta$-term

    hep-lat 2026-09 accept novelty 4.0 of 10

    A precise determination of the CP-violating pion-nucleon coupling from the isovector scalar charge yields gbar0/(2Fpi) = 17.4(1.9)x10^{-3} Theta.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    A. D. Sakharov, Violation of CP Invariance, C asymme- try, and baryon asymmetry of the universe, Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.5, 32 (1967)

    work page 1967

  2. [2]

    Kobayashi and T

    M. Kobayashi and T. Maskawa, CP violation in the renormalizable theory of weak interaction, Prog. Theor. Phys.49, 652 (1973)

    work page 1973

  3. [3]

    M. B. Gavela, P. Hernandez, J. Orloff, and O. Pene, Stan- dard model CP violation and baryon asymmetry, Mod. Phys. Lett. A9, 795 (1994), arXiv:hep-ph/9312215

    work page Pith review arXiv 1994

  4. [4]

    Electroweak Baryogenesis and Standard Model CP Violation

    P. Huet and E. Sather, Electroweak baryogenesis and standard model CP violation, Phys. Rev. D51, 379 (1995), arXiv:hep-ph/9404302

    work page Pith review arXiv 1995

  5. [5]

    Weinberg, Larger Higgs Exchange Terms in the Neu- tron Electric Dipole Moment, Phys

    S. Weinberg, Larger Higgs Exchange Terms in the Neu- tron Electric Dipole Moment, Phys. Rev. Lett.63, 2333 (1989)

    work page 1989

Show all 65 references
  1. [6]

    Abel et al

    C. Abel et al. (nEDM), Measurement of the permanent electric dipole moment of the neutron, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 081803 (2020), arXiv:2001.11966 [hep-ex]

    2020 arXiv

  2. [7]

    Graner, Y

    B. Graner, Y. Chen, E. G. Lindahl, and B. R. Heckel, Reduced limit on the permanent electric dipole moment of Hg199, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 161601 (2016), [Erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 119901 (2017)], arXiv:1601.04339 [physics.atom-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  3. [8]

    I. B. Khriplovich and A. R. Zhitnitsky, What is the value of the neutron electric dipole moment in the{Kobayashi- Maskawa}model?, Phys. Lett. B109, 490 (1982)

    1982

  4. [9]

    Czarnecki and B

    A. Czarnecki and B. Krause, Neutron electric dipole moment in the standard model: Valence quark contri- butions, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 4339 (1997), arXiv:hep- ph/9704355

    1997

  5. [10]

    Seng, Reexamination of the standard model nu- cleon electric dipole moment, Phys

    C.-Y. Seng, Reexamination of the standard model nu- cleon electric dipole moment, Phys. Rev. C91, 025502 (2015), arXiv:1411.1476 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  6. [11]

    Alarcon et al., Electric dipole moments and the search for new physics, in Snowmass 2021 (2022) arXiv:2203.08103 [hep-ph]

    R. Alarcon et al., Electric dipole moments and the search for new physics, in Snowmass 2021 (2022) arXiv:2203.08103 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  7. [12]

    Ito, SNS nEDM progress and plans,https: //indico.frib.msu.edu/event/13/contributions/ 191/attachments/79/384/SNSnEDM_Ito.pdf(2019)

    T. Ito, SNS nEDM progress and plans,https: //indico.frib.msu.edu/event/13/contributions/ 191/attachments/79/384/SNSnEDM_Ito.pdf(2019)

    2019

  8. [13]

    Pospelov and A

    M. Pospelov and A. Ritz, Theta induced electric dipole moment of the neutron via QCD sum rules, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 2526 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9904483

    1999 arXiv

  9. [14]

    Pospelov and A

    M. Pospelov and A. Ritz, Neutron EDM from electric and chromoelectric dipole moments of quarks, Phys. Rev. D 63, 073015 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0010037

    2001 arXiv

  10. [15]

    Lebedev, K

    O. Lebedev, K. A. Olive, M. Pospelov, and A. Ritz, Probing CP violation with the deuteron electric dipole moment, Phys. Rev. D70, 016003 (2004), arXiv:hep- ph/0402023

    2004

  11. [16]

    Pospelov and A

    M. Pospelov and A. Ritz, Electric dipole moments as probes of new physics, Annals Phys.318, 119 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0504231

    2005 arXiv

  12. [17]

    Fuyuto, J

    K. Fuyuto, J. Hisano, and N. Nagata, Neutron electric dipole moment induced by strangeness revisited, Phys. Rev. D87, 054018 (2013), arXiv:1211.5228 [hep-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  13. [18]

    Haisch and A

    U. Haisch and A. Hala, Sum rules for CP-violating operators of weinberg type, JHEP2019(11), 154, arXiv:1909.08955 [hep-ph]

    1909 arXiv

  14. [19]

    Y. Ema, T. Gao, M. Pospelov, and A. Ritz, Chiral properties of the nucleon interpolating current andθ- dependent observables, Phys. Rev. D110, 034028 (2024), arXiv:2405.08856 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  15. [20]

    R. J. Crewther, P. Di Vecchia, G. Veneziano, and E. Wit- ten, Chiral estimate of the electric dipole moment of the neutron in quantum chromodynamics, Phys. Lett. B88, 123 (1979), [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 91, 487 (1980)]

    1979

  16. [21]

    Pich and E

    A. Pich and E. de Rafael, Strong CP violation in an ef- fective chiral Lagrangian approach, Nucl. Phys. B367, 313 (1991)

    1991

  17. [22]

    P. L. Cho, Chiral estimates of strong CP violation revisited, Phys. Rev. D48, 3304 (1993), arXiv:hep- ph/9212274

    1993

  18. [23]

    Borasoy, The electric dipole moment of the neutron in chiral perturbation theory, Phys

    B. Borasoy, The electric dipole moment of the neutron in chiral perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D61, 114017 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/0004011

    2000 arXiv

  19. [24]

    W. H. Hockings and U. van Kolck, The electric dipole form factor of the nucleon, Phys. Lett. B605, 273 (2005), arXiv:nucl-th/0508012

    2005 arXiv

  20. [25]

    Narison, A fresh look into the neutron EDM and magnetic susceptibility, Phys

    S. Narison, A fresh look into the neutron EDM and magnetic susceptibility, Phys. Lett. B666, 455 (2008), arXiv:0806.2618 [hep-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  21. [26]

    Ottnad, B

    K. Ottnad, B. Kubis, U.-G. Meissner, and F.-K. Guo, New insights into the neutron electric dipole moment, Phys. Lett. B687, 42 (2010), arXiv:0911.3981 [hep-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  22. [27]

    de Vries, R

    J. de Vries, R. G. E. Timmermans, E. Mereghetti, and U. van Kolck, The nucleon electric dipole form factor from dimension-six time-reversal violation, Phys. Lett. B 695, 268 (2011), arXiv:1006.2304 [hep-ph]

    2011 arXiv

  23. [28]

    Mereghetti, J

    E. Mereghetti, J. de Vries, W. H. Hockings, C. M. Maekawa, and U. van Kolck, The electric dipole form factor of the nucleon in chiral perturbation theory to sub-leading order, Phys. Lett. B696, 97 (2011), arXiv:1010.4078 [hep-ph]

    2011 arXiv

  24. [29]

    Faccioli, D

    P. Faccioli, D. Guadagnoli, and S. Simula, The Neu- tron electric dipole moment in the instanton vacuum: Quenched versus unquenched simulations, Phys. Rev. D 70, 074017 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0406336

    2004 arXiv

  25. [30]

    Liu and I

    W.-Y. Liu and I. Zahed, Nucleon electric dipole form factor in the QCD instanton vacuum, Phys. Rev. D112, 094048 (2025), arXiv:2501.11856 [hep-ph]

    2025

  26. [31]

    Shintani, S

    E. Shintani, S. Aoki, N. Ishizuka, K. Kanaya, Y. Kikukawa, Y. Kuramashi, M. Okawa, Y. Taniguchi, A. Ukawa, and T. Yoshie, Neutron electric dipole mo- ment from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D72, 014504 (2005), arXiv:hep-lat/0505022

    2005 arXiv

  27. [32]

    Berruto, T

    F. Berruto, T. Blum, K. Orginos, and A. Soni, Calcu- lation of the neutron electric dipole moment with two dynamical flavors of domain wall fermions, Phys. Rev. D 73, 054509 (2006), arXiv:hep-lat/0512004

    2006 arXiv

  28. [33]

    Shindler, J

    A. Shindler, J. de Vries, and T. Luu, Beyond-the- standard-model matrix elements with the gradient flow, PoSLATTICE2014, 251 (2014), arXiv:1409.2735 [hep- lat]

    2014 arXiv

  29. [34]

    F.-K. Guo, R. Horsley, U.-G. Meissner, Y. Nakamura, H. Perlt, P. E. L. Rakow, G. Schierholz, A. Schiller, and J. M. Zanotti, The electric dipole moment of the neu- tron from 2+1 flavor lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 062001 (2015), arXiv:1502.02295 [hep-lat]

    2015 arXiv

  30. [35]

    Shindler, T

    A. Shindler, T. Luu, and J. de Vries, Nucleon elec- tric dipole moment with the gradient flow: Theθ- term contribution, Phys. Rev. D92, 094518 (2015), arXiv:1507.02343 [hep-lat]

    2015 arXiv

  31. [36]

    Alexandrou, A

    C. Alexandrou, A. Athenodorou, M. Constantinou, K. Hadjiyiannakou, K. Jansen, G. Koutsou, K. Ottnad, and M. Petschlies, Neutron electric dipole moment using Nf = 2 + 1 + 1 twisted mass fermions, Phys. Rev. D93, 074503 (2016), arXiv:1510.05823 [hep-lat]. 7

    2016 arXiv

  32. [37]

    Shintani, T

    E. Shintani, T. Blum, T. Izubuchi, and A. Soni, Neutron and proton electric dipole moments fromN f = 2 + 1 domain-wall fermion lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D93, 094503 (2016), arXiv:1512.00566 [hep-lat]

    2016 arXiv

  33. [38]

    Abramczyk, S

    M. Abramczyk, S. Aoki, T. Blum, T. Izubuchi, H. Ohki, and S. Syritsyn, Lattice calculation of electric dipole mo- ments and form factors of the nucleon, Phys. Rev.D96, 014501 (2017), arXiv:1701.07792 [hep-lat]

    2017 arXiv

  34. [39]

    Dragos, T

    J. Dragos, T. Luu, A. Shindler, J. de Vries, and A. Yousif, Confirming the existence of the strong CP problem in lattice QCD with the gradient flow, Phys. Rev. C103, 015202 (2021), arXiv:1902.03254 [hep-lat]

    2021 arXiv

  35. [40]

    Alexandrou, A

    C. Alexandrou, A. Athenodorou, K. Hadjiyiannakou, and A. Todaro, Neutron electric dipole moment using lattice QCD simulations at the physical point, Phys. Rev. D 103, 054501 (2021), arXiv:2011.01084 [hep-lat]

    2021

  36. [41]

    Bhattacharya, V

    T. Bhattacharya, V. Cirigliano, R. Gupta, E. Mereghetti, and B. Yoon, Contribution of the QCD Θ-term to the nu- cleon electric dipole moment, Phys. Rev. D103, 114507 (2021), arXiv:2101.07230 [hep-lat]

    2021 arXiv

  37. [42]

    Liang, A

    J. Liang, A. Alexandru, T. Draper, K.-F. Liu, B. Wang, G. Wang, and Y.-B. Yang (χQCD), Nucleon elec- tric dipole moment from theθterm with lattice chiral fermions, Phys. Rev. D108, 094512 (2023), arXiv:2301.04331 [hep-lat]

    2023 arXiv

  38. [43]

    J. Kim, J. Dragos, A. Shindler, T. Luu, and J. de Vries, Towards a determination of the nucleon EDM from the quark chromo-EDM operator with the gradient flow, PoS LATTICE2018, 260 (2019), arXiv:1810.10301 [hep-lat]

    2019 arXiv

  39. [44]

    Bhattacharya, V

    T. Bhattacharya, V. Cirigliano, R. Gupta, E. Mereghetti, J.-S. Yoo, and B. Yoon, Quark chromoelectric dipole mo- ment operator on the lattice, Phys. Rev. D108, 074507 (2023), arXiv:2304.09929 [hep-lat]

    2023 arXiv

  40. [45]

    Liu, Lattice QCD and the Neutron Electric Dipole Moment, Ann

    K.-F. Liu, Lattice QCD and the Neutron Electric Dipole Moment, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.75, 377 (2025), arXiv:2411.15198 [hep-lat]

    2025 arXiv

  41. [46]

    Aoki and A

    S. Aoki and A. Gocksch, The Neutron Electric Dipole Moment in Lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett.63, 1125 (1989), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 65, 1172 (1990)]

    1989

  42. [47]

    Shintani, S

    E. Shintani, S. Aoki, N. Ishizuka, K. Kanaya, Y. Kikukawa, Y. Kuramashi, M. Okawa, A. Ukawa, and T. Yoshie, Neutron electric dipole moment with external electric field method in lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D75, 034507 (2007), arXiv:hep-lat/0611032

    2007 arXiv

  43. [48]

    Shintani, S

    E. Shintani, S. Aoki, and Y. Kuramashi, Full QCD calcu- lation of neutron electric dipole moment with the exter- nal electric field method, Phys. Rev. D78, 014503 (2008), arXiv:0803.0797 [hep-lat]

    2008 arXiv

  44. [49]

    Izubuchi, S

    T. Izubuchi, S. Aoki, K. Hashimoto, Y. Nakamura, T. Sekido, and G. Schierholz, Dynamical QCD simula- tion with theta terms, PoSLATTICE2007, 106 (2007), arXiv:0802.1470 [hep-lat]

    2007 arXiv

  45. [50]

    Izubuchi, H

    T. Izubuchi, H. Ohki, and S. Syritsyn, Computing Nu- cleon Electric Dipole Moment from lattice QCD, PoS LATTICE2019, 290 (2020), arXiv:2004.10449 [hep-lat]

    2020 arXiv

  46. [51]

    F. He, M. Abramczyk, T. Blum, T. Izubuchi, H. Ohki, and S. Syritsyn, The calculations of Nucleon Electric Dipole Moment using background field on Lattice QCD, PoSLATTICE2023, 336 (2024), arXiv:2311.06106 [hep-lat]

    2024 arXiv

  47. [52]

    T. Blum, F. He, T. Izubuchi, L. Jin, H. Ohki, and S. Syritsyn, The Neutron Electric Dipole Moment from Lattice QCD using a Background Electric Field, (2026), arXiv:2607.10606 [hep-lat]

    2026 arXiv

  48. [53]

    Detmold, B

    W. Detmold, B. C. Tiburzi, and A. Walker-Loud, Extracting Electric Polarizabilities from Lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D79, 094505 (2009), arXiv:0904.1586 [hep- lat]

    2009 arXiv

  49. [54]

    ’t Hooft, A Property of Electric and Magnetic Flux in Nonabelian Gauge Theories, Nucl

    G. ’t Hooft, A Property of Electric and Magnetic Flux in Nonabelian Gauge Theories, Nucl. Phys. B153, 141 (1979)

    1979

  50. [55]

    ’t Hooft, Some Twisted Selfdual Solutions for the Yang-Mills Equations on a Hypertorus, Commun

    G. ’t Hooft, Some Twisted Selfdual Solutions for the Yang-Mills Equations on a Hypertorus, Commun. Math. Phys.81, 267 (1981)

    1981

  51. [56]

    R. P. Feynman, Forces in Molecules, Phys. Rev.56, 340 (1939)

    1939

  52. [57]

    Baluni, CP Violating Effects in QCD, Phys

    V. Baluni, CP Violating Effects in QCD, Phys. Rev. D 19, 2227 (1979)

    1979

  53. [58]

    Baym and D

    G. Baym and D. H. Beck, Elementary quantum mechan- ics of the neutron with an electric dipole moment, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.113, 7438 (2016), arXiv:1606.06774 [hep- ph]

    2016 arXiv

  54. [59]

    Allton et al

    C. Allton et al. (RBC-UKQCD), Physical Results from 2+1 Flavor Domain Wall QCD and SU(2) Chiral Per- turbation Theory, Phys. Rev.D78, 114509 (2008), arXiv:0804.0473 [hep-lat]

    2008 arXiv

  55. [60]

    L¨ uscher, Properties and uses of the wilson flow in lattice QCD, JHEP2010(08), 071, [Erratum: JHEP 03, 092 (2014)], arXiv:1006.4518 [hep-lat]

    M. L¨ uscher, Properties and uses of the wilson flow in lattice QCD, JHEP2010(08), 071, [Erratum: JHEP 03, 092 (2014)], arXiv:1006.4518 [hep-lat]

    2014 arXiv

  56. [61]

    Luscher and P

    M. Luscher and P. Weisz, Perturbative analysis of the gradient flow in non-abelian gauge theories, JHEP02, 051, arXiv:1101.0963 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  57. [62]

    See Supplemental Material for a detailed comparisons of different interpolating operator and for the dependence of the nEDM results on the gradient flow time

  58. [63]

    Blossier, M

    B. Blossier, M. Della Morte, G. von Hippel, T. Mendes, and R. Sommer, On the generalized eigenvalue method for energies and matrix elements in lattice field theory, JHEP04, 094, arXiv:0902.1265 [hep-lat]

    arXiv

  59. [64]

    Hackl and C

    A. Hackl and C. Lehner, Spectral analysis for nucleon- pion and nucleon-pion-pion states in both parity sec- tors using distillation with domain-wall fermions, (2024), arXiv:2412.17442 [hep-lat]

    2024 arXiv

  60. [65]

    O’Connell and M

    D. O’Connell and M. J. Savage, Extrapolation formulas for neutron EDM calculations in lattice QCD, Phys. Lett. B633, 319 (2006), arXiv:hep-lat/0508009. 8 SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL Comparison of different interpolating operators In this section, we compare the nEDM results, effecti...

    2006 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 27, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.