Phase transitions of a cubic Casimir matrix model on the fuzzy sphere

Andr\'es Tornero; Edgar Guzm\'an-Gonz\'alez; Marco Maceda

REVIEW

Phase transitions of a cubic Casimir matrix model on the fuzzy sphere

Edgar Guzmán-González, Marco Maceda, Andrés Tornero

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 23 Oct 2026 · 28 references

Pith's verdict: Honest, incremental extension of the fuzzy-sphere Casimir matrix model to a cubic kinetic term, with a clean closed-form constant and a proper c→0 limit, but the triple-point numbers rest on unchecked Padé extrapolation and the UV/IR claim outruns the computation.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash) read the paper on October 26, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 2 major objections · 4 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →

Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

arXiv ID2610.32552 (version 1)

Pith IDDZDTOVKZ, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review

CitationAndr\'es Tornero, Edgar Guzm\'an-Gonz\'alez, Marco Maceda. "Phase transitions of a cubic Casimir matrix model on the fuzzy sphere." arXiv:2610.32552 (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DZDTOVKZ

Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper

Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Editor's note

read the letter

Colleague,

Read of arXiv:2610.32552. It is a genuine but incremental extension: the Šubjaková–Tekel fuzzy-sphere matrix model with the kinetic term extended from quadratic to cubic in the Casimir, κ(x) = x + bx² + cx³. The new results are the closed-form integration constant C in Eq. (25), the gc(b, c) tables, and the monotonic shift of the triple point with c. The appendices are the best part: the asymptotic matching is careful, including the Mathematica arctan subtlety that introduces a spurious singularity in the c→0 limit, and the c→0 reduction of C checks against the published quadratic result.

The soft spot is exactly where the stress test points. The triple point sits near r = −5√gc ≈ −0.44; Eqs. (34) and (42) are large-|r| expansions pushed there by a [9/9] Padé, and the asymmetric phase is where the risk concentrates. The 0.02% agreement between Tables I and II is weaker than it looks: both determinations intersect the same symmetric transition line and both go through the same large-t free energies and the same Padé procedure, so they cross-check the series algebra, not the approximation. And the r = −5√g check compares only the two symmetric free energies, Eqs. (39) vs (44) — it says nothing about whether the asymmetric phase's free energy is right where Padé is extrapolating it. The symmetric transition line itself is solid (exponentially suppressed corrections are ~1e-5 at these g), so the load-bearing, unchecked piece is the asymmetric side. The authors are upfront that Eq. (45) is a large-r expansion; they just do not provide the independent verification (released code, direct large-N solution of the saddle-point equations, or Monte Carlo) that would settle it. The N = 2 toy Monte Carlo in Section III does not count as a check of the large-N claim.

Smaller things: the abstract's UV/IR-mixing claim outruns the computation — the conclusion correctly hedges ("commonly associated"), the abstract does not. And the "around 60%" increase for c = 0.6 does not match the printed rows in Tables I–II (the b = 0.5 row rises about 20% from c = 0.001 to c = 0.6); it may come from the b = 0.75/1.0 data in Fig. 3, but as printed it reads like a typo.

Bottom line: this is a coherent, honest calculation with a clean analytic core, and the c→0 limit anchors it to known territory. It deserves a serious referee, and the referee should ask for code or a direct large-N check before the triple-point numbers are treated as settled. For anyone working on fuzzy-sphere matrix models and UV/IR mixing, it is worth a read.

Referee report

Significance

If the quantitative results hold, the paper makes a useful contribution: it exhibits the triple point as a robust feature of fuzzy-sphere matrix models beyond linear and quadratic kinetics, and shows that its location is tunable by the cubic coefficient. The analytic parts are solid: the computation of C in Appendix B, its smooth c → 0 reduction (Eq. (26)), and the closed-form saddle-point free energies (39), (43), (44) are genuine extensions of [22], and the paper is reproducible in structure (series, Padé orders, tables). The framework imported from [22] is used appropriately: the saddle-point equations (27), (31), (32) are fixed by the support ansatz and the potential, the model dependence resides in F(t), which is derived here for the cubic case, and the c → 0 checks are legitimate consistency checks rather than circular reasoning; the stress-test concern about circularity does not land. The main gap is quantitative: the triple-point location and the gc(c) trend rest on Padé extrapolation of large-|r| asymptotics into a regime where 1/r is O(1), with no error estimate or independent check, so the numerical conclusions are at present conditional on that extrapolation.

Major objections (2)

[Section V; Eqs. (34), (45); Tables I–II; Fig. 4] The triple point is determined by extrapolating large-|r| asymptotics into a region where the expansion parameter is O(1). For the representative case b = 0.5, c = 0.3, Table I gives gc = 0.00764877, i.e. r ≈ −5√g ≈ −0.437; the asymmetric-phase transition lines feeding into Tables I and II are built from the 1/r series (34)–(37) and the ansatz (45), whose terms only decay as inverse powers of r. The authors acknowledge that Eq. (45) is only valid for large r ('Since Eq. (45) is only valid for large r, we need to extrapolate it...'), but no error estimate, Padé-order study, or independent check is provided. The agreement between Tables I and II to about 0.02% is not independent confirmation: ga1s2c and ga1s1c both intersect the same symmetric transition line (28), use the same large-t free-energy series (34), (37), (42), and the same Padé procedure, and the verification along r = −5√g compares only the symmetric-phase expressions (39) and (44), which do not involve the asymmetric-phase series that fix the triple point. The claims of a monotone increase of gc with c and of shrinkage of the two-cut region are therefore supported only to the accuracy of an uncontrolled extrapolation. Please add (i) a stability analysis of the Padé results under variation of the approximant order (e.g. [7/7] through [11/11]) and of the truncation order of the input series, (ii) a direct check against numerical solution of the saddle-point equations at finite |r| or a Monte Carlo simulation at moderate N extending the N = 2 study of Section III, and (iii) an explicit error estimate on the extrapolated gc values. The authors acknowledge this: “Since Eq. ( 45) is only valid for large r, we need to extrapolate it if contact with small values of r is sought, namely, if we are near the origin in the (g, r)-plane.”
[Abstract; Section VI] The abstract and conclusions state that the cubic kinetic term 'helps to reduce the UV/IR mixing' in these models. The paper computes no UV/IR-sensitive observable; the inference chains the literature association between the two-cut phase and UV/IR mixing to the displacement of the triple point and the inferred shrinkage of the two-cut region. Since that displacement is precisely the quantity resting on the Padé extrapolation discussed above, the causal statement is currently stronger than the evidence presented. Either rephrase the conclusion as a heuristic expectation supported by the cited literature, or compute a direct probe of UV/IR mixing (for example a momentum-space two-point function or dispersion relation around the ordered background).

Minor objections (4)

[Section IV.A, Eqs. (29)–(30)] Equations (29) and (30) are inconsistent as displayed: substituting the leading term r = −5√g from (28) into (29) yields 11/8 − (5/2)g + (1/2)ln 2 + (1/2)C plus exponential corrections, whereas (30) has −9/8 in place of 11/8 − (5/2)g; the two forms differ by (5/2)(1 − g) and agree only at g = 1. Since the numerical work uses the closed forms (39) and (44), this does not affect the main results, but the two displayed expressions should be reconciled and the one actually used should be identified.
[Eq. (25)] For most tabulated parameters b² − 4c < 0, so √(b² − 4c) and the arccoth/logarithms in (25) are complex-valued; the paper does not state which branches are taken in the numerical evaluation of C. A short remark specifying the principal branches, or giving the manifestly real form used to produce Tables I and II, would make the computation reproducible from the text alone.
[Throughout] There are numerous typographical artifacts: section headings read 'CUBIC MA TRIX MODEL' and 'PHASE TRANSITIONS OF THE CUBIC CASIMIR KINETIC MA TRIX MODEL', and the text contains ligature typos such as 'suﬀicient', 'diﬀiculty', 'insuﬀicient', and 'coeffcient'. A careful proofreading pass is needed.
[Section III and Fig. 1] The N = 2 Monte Carlo analysis is qualitative support only: it is performed at fixed (a, g) = (1, 50) with b = 0.5, c = 0.3, and the comparison with the linear model is read off the figure. Stating the numerical procedure (number of sweeps, thermalization, error bars) and identifying the line styles in the caption unambiguously would strengthen this argument.

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

The paper

The paper claims

The paper claims that a cubic Casimir kinetic term preserves the triple point of the fuzzy-sphere matrix model, shifting it toward stronger coupling and shrinking the two-cut phase tied to UV/IR mixing.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that a matrix model on the fuzzy sphere whose kinetic term is a cubic polynomial in the Casimir operator, $\kappa(x) = x + bx^2 + cx^3$, has the same three phases as the linear and quadratic Casimir models: asymmetric one-cut, symmetric one-cut, and symmetric two-cut. The three transition lines are claimed to meet at a triple point whose position is tunable through the coefficients $b$ and $c$. The critical coupling $g_c$ grows monotonically with $c$ for fixed $b$, moving the triple point toward larger $g$ and more negative $r$, and two independent determinations of $g_c$ agree to about 0.02 percent, which the authors read as evidence that the triple point survives the cubic modification. Because the two-cut phase is associated with UV/IR mixing, the paper concludes that increasing $c$ shrinks that phase and thereby suppresses the mixing. It also derives a closed-form expression for the integration constant $C$ that fixes the large-$t$ free energy, removing a step that previous treatments could not do analytically.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the large-$N$ effective action for the eigenvalues, in which the entire kinetic operator enters through the function $f(z) = \int_0^1 dx/(K(x)+z)$ and the free-energy density $F(t)$ defined by $F'(t) = 1/t - f^{-1}(t)$. Everything else, the saddle-point equations for each phase's support, the transition-line equations, and the free-energy comparisons that locate the triple point, is built from $F(t)$ with $K(x) = x + bx^2 + cx^3$. Two technical pieces carry the cubic case: an asymptotic-matching evaluation of $f(z)$ for small $z$, given in Appendix A, and a closed-form expression for the integration constant $C$, fixed by $F(0) = 0$ and presented in Eq. (25) of Appendix B, without which the large-$t$ free energies of the phases could not be compared. The phase diagram is assembled from large-$|r|$ series for the transition lines, with a $[9/9]$ Pad\'e approximant used for the asymmetric one-cut/symmetric one-cut boundary, so the extrapolation down to the triple-point region is part of the machinery rather than a separate input.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the cubic kinetic operator $K(x) = x + bx^2 + cx^3$ preserves the phase architecture of the fuzzy-sphere matrix model while systematically displacing it. Using the large-$N$ effective action for the eigenvalue density, the paper computes the transition line between the symmetric one-cut and symmetric two-cut phases, the line between the asymmetric one-cut and symmetric two-cut phases, and the line between the asymmetric one-cut and symmetric one-cut phases, the last of these assembled from a Pad\'e extrapolation of a large-$|r|$ series. The critical couplings obtained from the two pairwise intersections agree to about five digits, about 0.02 percent relative difference, which the authors take as evidence that all three boundary lines meet at a triple point. As $c$ increases at fixed $b$, both determinations of $g_c$ rise by up to roughly 60 percent over the range studied, pushing the triple point toward larger $g$ and more negative $r$. The paper associates the resulting shrinkage of the symmetric two-cut region with reduced UV/IR mixing, and it verifies consistency by showing that the non-perturbative closed-form free energies agree along the curve $r = -5\sqrt{g}$ and that the $c \to 0$ limit recovers the quadratic-model results.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that the large-$N$ effective action with cubic kinetic operator $K(x) = x + bx^2 + cx^3$, together with the saddle-point equations taken over from the quadratic-model treatment, stays valid, and that the transition lines obtained from large-$|r|$ expansions and extrapolated with Pad\'e approximants are accurate in the triple-point region; no direct large-$N$ simulation checks that extrapolation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The triple point is not an accident of linear or quadratic kinetic terms: a cubic Casimir kinetic term preserves it, so the three-phase structure appears generic across higher-derivative fuzzy-sphere matrix models.
The triple point's location is a tunable function of $(b, c)$; raising $c$ at fixed $b$ moves it to larger $g$ and more negative $r$, enlarging the parameter region where the symmetric one-cut (disordered) phase dominates.
Because the symmetric two-cut phase is the signal of UV/IR mixing in these models, the shrinking of that phase with increasing $c$ is evidence that cubic kinetic terms suppress the mixing, the mechanism the paper compares with wave-function regularization.
The closed-form constant $C$ of Eq. (25) removes the need for numerical or perturbative determination of the large-$t$ free energy for this model, and its $c \to 0$ limit reproduces the quadratic-model constant, providing a built-in consistency check.
The reported agreement of the two determinations of $g_c$ to about 0.02 percent means the phase diagram shown for, e.g., $b = 0.5$, $c = 0.3$ with $g_c \approx 0.00765$, is a quantitative prediction that future simulations can test directly.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the monotone drift of $g_c$ with $c$ extends beyond the Pad\'e-extrapolated region, then direct Monte Carlo simulations of the full matrix model near the triple point could deliberately raise $c$ to push the non-uniform ordered phase out of a chosen parameter window, making numerical studies of the disordered phase cheaper to perform.
The same method that produced the closed-form $C$ for the cubic operator should extend to quartic or general polynomial kinetic operators with $K(0) = 0$; the natural prediction is a whole family of triple points whose $g_c$ keeps increasing and whose two-cut region keeps shrinking as the polynomial gains positive higher-degree terms.
The heuristic that increasing $c$ favours the $l = 0$ mode, the identity component of the field, suggests a direct check: the width of the asymmetric one-cut support at fixed $g$ and $r$ should decrease as $c$ grows, which would confirm that the cubic term drives the eigenvalue distribution toward a single point.
Because the paper stops at $c = 0.6$, a testable extension is whether the roughly 60 percent rise in $g_c$ persists, accelerates, or saturates for larger $c$; that behaviour would discriminate between a mild tuning knob and a strong suppression mechanism for UV/IR mixing.

Original abstract

In this work, we analyse the phase transitions of a higher derivative matrix model on the fuzzy space, where the kinetic term is a cubic polynomial on the Casimir invariant. The phase transitions of the model are determined numerically and the presence of a triple point is exhibited. The associated critical values of the coupling parameters are calculated numerically and compared with the linear and quadratic Casimir models, showing that the cubic Casimir kinetic term helps to reduce the UV/IR mixing in these models.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-10-26: 1 request, 2,959 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.09 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.55 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.19 · compares with prior results 0.96 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

In this work, we analyse the phase transitions of a higher derivative matrix model on the fuzzy space, where the kinetic term is a cubic polynomial on the Casimir invariant. The phase transitions of the model are determined numerically and the presence of a triple point is exhibited. The associated critical values of the coupling parameters are calculated numerically and compared with the linear and quadratic Casimir models, showing that the cubic Casimir kinetic term helps to reduce the UV/IR mixing in these models.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	In this work, we analyse the phase transitions of a higher derivative matrix model on the fuzzy space, where the kinetic term is a cubic polynomial on the Casimir invariant.	contribution 0.98	0.89	0.07	asserted 0.96
s1	The phase transitions of the model are determined numerically and the presence of a triple point is exhibited.	result 0.97	0.95	0.38	asserted 1.00
s2	The associated critical values of the coupling parameters are calculated numerically and compared with the linear and quadratic Casimir models, showing that the cubic Casimir kinetic term helps to reduce the UV/IR mixing in these models.	result 0.73	0.94	0.57	asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: simulation study 0.99 · evidence from simulation or computation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v1

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

References

Works cited (28)

[22]

M. Šubjaková and J. Tekel, Second moment fuzzy-field-theory-like matrix models, JHEP 6, 88 , arXiv:2002.02317 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002
[1]

D. O’Connor and C. Saemann, Fuzzy Scalar Field Theory as a Multitrace Matrix Model, JHEP 8, 66 , arXiv:0706.2493 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[2]

B. Ydri, R. Khaled, and C. Soudani, Quantized noncommutative geometry from multitrace matrix models, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 37, 2250052 (2022) , arXiv:2110.06677 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022
[3]

H. Grosse and R. Wulkenhaar, Renormalisation of ϕ4 theory on noncommutative R4 in the matrix base, Commun. Math. Phys. 256, 305 (2005) , arXiv:hep-th/0401128

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005
[4]

H. Grosse and R. Wulkenhaar, Renormalisation of ϕ4 theory on noncommutative R4 to all orders, Lett. Math. Phys. 71, 13 (2005) , arXiv:hep-th/0403232

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005
[5]

B. Ydri, A. Rouag, and K. Ramda, Emergent fuzzy geometry and fuzzy physics in four dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B 916, 567 (2017) , arXiv:1607.08296 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2017
[6]

B. Ydri, R. Khaled, and R. Ahlam, Geometry in transition in four dimensions: A model of emergent geometry in the early universe, Phys. Rev. D 94, 085020 (2016) , arXiv:1607.06761 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2016
[7]

D. Prekrat, D. Ranković, N. K. Todorović-Vasović, S. Kováčik, and J. Tekel, Phase transitions in a Φ4 matrix model on a curved noncommutative space, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 38, 2343002 (2023) , arXiv:2310.10794 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2023
[8]

G. Livan, M. Novaes, and P. Vivo, eds., Introduction to Random Matrices (Springer, 2018)

View on Pith 2018
[9]

F. Garcia Flores, X. Martin, and D. O’Connor, Simulation of a scalar field on a fuzzy sphere, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 24, 3917 (2009) , arXiv:0903.1986 [hep-lat]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2009
[10]

R. Delgadillo-Blando, D. O’Connor, and B. Ydri, Geometry in Transition: A Model of Emergent Geometry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 201601 (2008) , arXiv:0712.3011 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2008
[11]

S. Kováčik and J. Tekel, Eigenvalue-flipping algorithm for matrix Monte Carlo, JHEP 4, 149 , arXiv:2203.05422 [hep-lat]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[12]

J. Madore, The fuzzy sphere, Class. Quant. Grav. 9, 69 (1992)

View on Pith 1992
[13]

E. Brezin, C. Itzykson, G. Parisi, and J. B. Zuber, Planar Diagrams, Commun. Math. Phys. 59, 35 (1978)

View on Pith 1978
[14]

Y. Shimamune, On the Phase Structure of Large N Matrix Models and Gauge Models, Phys. Lett. B 108, 407 (1982)

View on Pith 1982
[15]

J. Ambjørn and S. Catterall, Stripes from (noncommutative) stars, Phys. Lett. B 549, 253 (2002) , arXiv:hep-lat/0209106

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002
[16]

W. Bietenholz, F. Hofheinz, and J. Nishimura, Phase diagram and dispersion relation of the noncommutative λϕ4 model in d = 3, JHEP 6, 042 , arXiv:hep-th/0404020

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[17]

H. Steinacker, A Non-perturbative approach to non-commutative scalar field theory, JHEP 3, 75 , arXiv:hep-th/0501174

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[18]

H. Steinacker, Quantization and eigenvalue distribution of noncommutative scalar field theory, in 2nd Southeastern Euro- pean Workshop on Challenges Beyond the Standard Model (2005) arXiv:hep-th/0511076

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005
[19]

D. O’Connor and C. Saemann, A Multitrace matrix model from fuzzy scalar field theory, in 7th International Workshop on Supersymmetries and Quantum Symmetries (2008) pp. 148–155, arXiv:0709.0387 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2008
[20]

B. Ydri, The multitrace matrix model: An alternative to Connes NCG and IKKT model in 2 dimensions, Phys. Lett. B 763, 161 (2016) , arXiv:1608.02758 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2016
[21]

M. Šubjaková and J. Tekel, Matrix Models of Fuzzy Field Theories, PoS CORFU2017, 144 (2018) , arXiv:1802.05188 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2018
[23]

N. Ishibashi, H. Kawai, Y. Kitazawa, and A. Tsuchiya, A Large N reduced model as superstring, Nucl. Phys. B 498, 467 (1997), arXiv:hep-th/9612115

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1997
[24]

J. Medina-García, Fuzzy scalar field theories: Numerical and analytical investigations , Ph.D. thesis, CINVESTA V (2006)

View on Pith 2006
[25]

D. A. Varshalovich, A. N. Moskalev, and V. K. Khersonsky, Quantum Theory of Angular Momentum: Irreducible Tensors, Spherical Harmonics, Vector Coupling Coeﬀicients, 3nj Symbols (World Scientific, 1998). 16

View on Pith 1998
[26]

C. M. Bender and S. A. Orszag, Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers: Asymptotic Methods and Perturbation Theory (McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1978)

View on Pith 1978
[27]

S. Kováčik and D. O’Connor, Triple point of a scalar field theory on a fuzzy sphere, JHEP 10, 10 , arXiv:1805.08111 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[28]

A. P. Polychronakos, Effective action and phase transitions of scalar field on the fuzzy sphere, Phys. Rev. D 88, 065010 (2013), arXiv:1306.6645 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2013

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.

[1] [22]

M. Šubjaková and J. Tekel, Second moment fuzzy-field-theory-like matrix models, JHEP 6, 88 , arXiv:2002.02317 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002

[2] [1]

D. O’Connor and C. Saemann, Fuzzy Scalar Field Theory as a Multitrace Matrix Model, JHEP 8, 66 , arXiv:0706.2493 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[3] [2]

B. Ydri, R. Khaled, and C. Soudani, Quantized noncommutative geometry from multitrace matrix models, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 37, 2250052 (2022) , arXiv:2110.06677 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022

[4] [3]

H. Grosse and R. Wulkenhaar, Renormalisation of ϕ4 theory on noncommutative R4 in the matrix base, Commun. Math. Phys. 256, 305 (2005) , arXiv:hep-th/0401128

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005

[5] [4]

H. Grosse and R. Wulkenhaar, Renormalisation of ϕ4 theory on noncommutative R4 to all orders, Lett. Math. Phys. 71, 13 (2005) , arXiv:hep-th/0403232

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005

[6] [5]

B. Ydri, A. Rouag, and K. Ramda, Emergent fuzzy geometry and fuzzy physics in four dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B 916, 567 (2017) , arXiv:1607.08296 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2017

[7] [6]

B. Ydri, R. Khaled, and R. Ahlam, Geometry in transition in four dimensions: A model of emergent geometry in the early universe, Phys. Rev. D 94, 085020 (2016) , arXiv:1607.06761 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2016

[8] [7]

D. Prekrat, D. Ranković, N. K. Todorović-Vasović, S. Kováčik, and J. Tekel, Phase transitions in a Φ4 matrix model on a curved noncommutative space, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 38, 2343002 (2023) , arXiv:2310.10794 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2023

[9] [8]

G. Livan, M. Novaes, and P. Vivo, eds., Introduction to Random Matrices (Springer, 2018)

View on Pith 2018

[10] [9]

F. Garcia Flores, X. Martin, and D. O’Connor, Simulation of a scalar field on a fuzzy sphere, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 24, 3917 (2009) , arXiv:0903.1986 [hep-lat]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2009

[11] [10]

R. Delgadillo-Blando, D. O’Connor, and B. Ydri, Geometry in Transition: A Model of Emergent Geometry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 201601 (2008) , arXiv:0712.3011 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2008

[12] [11]

S. Kováčik and J. Tekel, Eigenvalue-flipping algorithm for matrix Monte Carlo, JHEP 4, 149 , arXiv:2203.05422 [hep-lat]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[13] [12]

J. Madore, The fuzzy sphere, Class. Quant. Grav. 9, 69 (1992)

View on Pith 1992

[14] [13]

E. Brezin, C. Itzykson, G. Parisi, and J. B. Zuber, Planar Diagrams, Commun. Math. Phys. 59, 35 (1978)

View on Pith 1978

[15] [14]

Y. Shimamune, On the Phase Structure of Large N Matrix Models and Gauge Models, Phys. Lett. B 108, 407 (1982)

View on Pith 1982

[16] [15]

J. Ambjørn and S. Catterall, Stripes from (noncommutative) stars, Phys. Lett. B 549, 253 (2002) , arXiv:hep-lat/0209106

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002

[17] [16]

W. Bietenholz, F. Hofheinz, and J. Nishimura, Phase diagram and dispersion relation of the noncommutative λϕ4 model in d = 3, JHEP 6, 042 , arXiv:hep-th/0404020

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[18] [17]

H. Steinacker, A Non-perturbative approach to non-commutative scalar field theory, JHEP 3, 75 , arXiv:hep-th/0501174

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[19] [18]

H. Steinacker, Quantization and eigenvalue distribution of noncommutative scalar field theory, in 2nd Southeastern Euro- pean Workshop on Challenges Beyond the Standard Model (2005) arXiv:hep-th/0511076

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005

[20] [19]

D. O’Connor and C. Saemann, A Multitrace matrix model from fuzzy scalar field theory, in 7th International Workshop on Supersymmetries and Quantum Symmetries (2008) pp. 148–155, arXiv:0709.0387 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2008

[21] [20]

B. Ydri, The multitrace matrix model: An alternative to Connes NCG and IKKT model in 2 dimensions, Phys. Lett. B 763, 161 (2016) , arXiv:1608.02758 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2016

[22] [21]

M. Šubjaková and J. Tekel, Matrix Models of Fuzzy Field Theories, PoS CORFU2017, 144 (2018) , arXiv:1802.05188 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2018

[23] [23]

N. Ishibashi, H. Kawai, Y. Kitazawa, and A. Tsuchiya, A Large N reduced model as superstring, Nucl. Phys. B 498, 467 (1997), arXiv:hep-th/9612115

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1997

[24] [24]

J. Medina-García, Fuzzy scalar field theories: Numerical and analytical investigations , Ph.D. thesis, CINVESTA V (2006)

View on Pith 2006

[25] [25]

D. A. Varshalovich, A. N. Moskalev, and V. K. Khersonsky, Quantum Theory of Angular Momentum: Irreducible Tensors, Spherical Harmonics, Vector Coupling Coeﬀicients, 3nj Symbols (World Scientific, 1998). 16

View on Pith 1998

[26] [26]

C. M. Bender and S. A. Orszag, Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers: Asymptotic Methods and Perturbation Theory (McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1978)

View on Pith 1978

[27] [27]

S. Kováčik and D. O’Connor, Triple point of a scalar field theory on a fuzzy sphere, JHEP 10, 10 , arXiv:1805.08111 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[28] [28]

A. P. Polychronakos, Effective action and phase transitions of scalar field on the fuzzy sphere, Phys. Rev. D 88, 065010 (2013), arXiv:1306.6645 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2013