pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.16398 · v1 · pith:26QETU7Nnew · submitted 2026-05-12 · 💻 cs.RO · cs.AI

Support-Safe Variational Hybrid Filtering for Contact-Mode and Sparse-Law Recovery

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 21:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO cs.AI
keywords variational hybrid filteringcontact mode recoverysparse port-Hamiltonian recoveryhybrid robot dynamicssupport coveragemode inferencecontact-rich tasks
0
0 comments X

The pith

Support-safe mixing of proposals with feasible laws prevents variational hybrid filters from losing contact branches and enables sparse port-Hamiltonian recovery per coherent regime.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper addresses hybrid robot dynamics in which one observation can arise from multiple latent states and contact regimes such as free motion, impact, or stick-slip. A standard amortized filter that assigns zero probability to a feasible transition permanently loses the branch the robot actually follows. VHYDRO mixes the learned proposal with a feasible transition law before sampling and importance weighting to keep every retained transition covered. This coverage stabilizes filtering and concentrates the discrete contact posterior on coherent regimes. Mode-pure segments then admit sparse recovery of the governing port-Hamiltonian law, with recovery error decomposing into separate filtering, derivative, mode-impurity, and physics-residual contributions.

Core claim

Three guarantees connect: support coverage from the mixing step stabilizes filtering, the stabilized filter concentrates the discrete contact posterior on coherent regimes, and mode-pure segments admit sparse port-Hamiltonian recovery. The recovery error separates cleanly into filtering, derivative, mode-impurity, and physics-residual parts. Three empirical findings track the same mechanism on occluded data, ManiSkill demonstrations, Sawyer and BridgeData tasks, and hybrid systems with known equations.

What carries the argument

VHYDRO, the variational hybrid dynamics learner that mixes the learned proposal with a feasible transition law before sampling and importance weighting to maintain support coverage.

If this is right

  • Under heavy occlusion the support-safe filter remains usable while a non-defensive proposal collapses.
  • On demonstration data the inferred discrete states form temporally coherent contact-regime segments.
  • Mode-conditioned sparse fits recover the active physical terms on hybrid systems whose equations are known.
  • The recovered segments produce stronger joint scores on adjusted rand index, change-point F1, and segment purity than post-hoc or mode-free baselines.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same mixing principle could be tested on hybrid models outside robotics, such as piecewise-linear mechanical systems or switched electrical circuits.
  • If the concentration guarantee holds, the method may supply reliable mode labels for downstream model-predictive control that must switch between different contact laws.
  • An extension could replace the port-Hamiltonian sparsity penalty with other structured priors while retaining the support-coverage argument.

Load-bearing premise

Mixing the learned proposal with a feasible transition law before sampling and importance weighting guarantees that every transition retained by the model-feasible carrier remains covered and preserves the variational properties needed for concentration and sparse recovery.

What would settle it

Run the filter on a known hybrid system under heavy occlusion with and without the mixing step; if the non-mixed version permanently drops a feasible contact branch while the mixed version recovers both the mode sequence and the sparse physical terms, the mechanism is confirmed.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.16398 by Marios Papamichalis, Regina Ruane.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Algorithmic summary of the VHyDRO filtering step. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Why support-safe hybrid inference matters. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Support-safe filtering under partial observation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Support-safe variance certificate. Points below the diagonal satisfy the empirical certificate margin. The high-λ variant is deliberately conservative; the adaptive variant stays closer to the certified frontier. furthest below the diagonal, giving the most conservative certificate. The adaptive proposal tracks the bound more tightly, using less defensive mass while preserving low likelihood error in the m… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Full occlusion diagnostics. The informative regime is the high￾occlusion end of the sweep. Support-safe proposals keep uncertainty usable where non-defensive and smooth proposals under-cover and incur unstable normalizer estimates. 21 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Representative held-out mode timelines. VHyDRO infers tem￾porally coherent mode segments that align with denoised kinematic proxy labels. Alignment is measured against denoised kinematic proxy labels; no simulator contact￾force labels are used. 26 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Kinematic proxy-label construction. Histograms of the smoothed kinematic score used to form denoised free/impact/stick-slip proxy labels from HDF5 states and actions. The labels audit mode segmentation; they are not simulator contact-force labels. 27 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Sawyer/BridgeData mode timelines with proxy labels. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Sawyer/BridgeData kinematic-score histograms. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Coefficient recovery scatter. Estimated active coefficients versus true active coefficients. VHyDRO concentrates tightly around the identity line, while the no-sparsity ablation exhibits larger spread and systematic inflation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Physical-constant error. VHyDRO preserves the physical constants implied by the recovered law. The no-mode ablation is unstable because it conflates distinct regimes, and the no-pH baseline is not defined in this metric. 35 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Sparse support precision. The key difference between VHyDRO and the ablations is selectivity: VHyDRO recovers the active support while suppressing inactive library terms [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Sparse physical-law recovery. On hybrid systems with known sparse port-Hamiltonian laws, VHyDRO recovers the active library terms with high support F1 and low coefficient error. The no-mode ablation confounds regimes, the no-sparsity ablation predicts with dense coefficients but loses sparse support recovery, and the no-pH ablation fits a vector field without recoverable port-Hamiltonian coefficients. Peg… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Supplementary Experiment 4 MPC diagnostics. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_14.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Contact-rich robot dynamics are hybrid: a single observation can match several latent states and contact regimes (free, impact, stick--slip). A standard amortized filter that places no probability on a feasible contact transition will permanently lose the branch the robot actually follows. We introduce VHYDRO, a variational hybrid dynamics learner that prevents this branch loss. At each step, VHYDRO mixes the learned proposal with a feasible transition law before sampling and importance weighting, ensuring that every transition retained by the model-feasible carrier remains covered. VHYDRO jointly infers a continuous latent state and a discrete contact mode, and fits a sparse port-Hamiltonian law to each recovered regime. On top of this, three guarantees connect: support coverage stabilizes filtering, the stabilized filter concentrates the discrete contact posterior on coherent regimes, and mode-pure segments admit sparse port-Hamiltonian recovery. The recovery error separates cleanly into filtering, derivative, mode-impurity, and physics-residual parts. Three empirical findings track the same mechanism. Under heavy occlusion the support-safe filter stays usable while a non-defensive proposal collapses. On ManiSkill demonstrations and on four Sawyer/BridgeData task families the discrete state forms temporally coherent contact-regime segments that the discrete state yields a stronger joint profile across ARI, change-point F1, and segment purity than post-hoc and mode-free baselines. On hybrid systems with known equations the mode-conditioned sparse fit recovers the active physical terms; purely predictive baselines do not.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces VHYDRO, a variational hybrid dynamics learner for contact-rich robot systems. It mixes a learned proposal with a feasible transition law at each step before sampling and importance weighting to ensure support coverage and prevent permanent loss of feasible contact branches. The method jointly infers continuous latent states and discrete contact modes, then fits sparse port-Hamiltonian laws to recovered regimes. Three guarantees are asserted: support coverage stabilizes filtering, the stabilized filter concentrates the discrete posterior on coherent regimes, and mode-pure segments enable sparse recovery. Recovery error decomposes into filtering, derivative, mode-impurity, and physics-residual terms. Empirical results on ManiSkill demonstrations and Sawyer/BridgeData tasks show improved temporal coherence (via ARI, change-point F1, segment purity) under occlusion compared to non-defensive and post-hoc baselines.

Significance. If the support-coverage mechanism and the three chained guarantees hold with the claimed clean error separation, the work would provide a principled defense against branch loss in hybrid filtering and enable more reliable sparse physics recovery from mode-pure segments. This could meaningfully advance robust contact-mode identification and hybrid system learning in robotics, particularly for tasks with heavy occlusion or sparse demonstrations.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (paragraph on VHYDRO definition): The central mixing step—combining the learned proposal with a feasible transition law before sampling and importance weighting—is described only at a high level. No explicit equations define the mixing coefficient, the resulting importance weights, or how the procedure preserves unbiasedness or variational consistency with respect to the true hybrid posterior. This mixing is load-bearing for the support-coverage stabilization guarantee and for preventing mode-impurity leakage into the recovery error decomposition.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The three guarantees (support coverage stabilizes filtering; stabilized filter concentrates discrete posterior; mode-pure segments admit sparse port-Hamiltonian recovery) and the clean four-part error decomposition are asserted without derivations, proof sketches, or explicit equations showing how the mixing step yields the claimed concentration or separation. These assertions are central to the paper's contribution but remain unverifiable from the text.
  3. [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that the discrete state yields stronger joint profiles across ARI, change-point F1, and segment purity than post-hoc and mode-free baselines is presented without quantitative tables or statistical details in the provided text, making it difficult to assess the magnitude and robustness of the empirical support for the concentration guarantee.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'model-feasible carrier' and 'VHYDRO' without a prior definition or acronym expansion; a brief inline definition on first use would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive feedback. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make to strengthen the clarity of the abstract while preserving the manuscript's technical content.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (paragraph on VHYDRO definition): The central mixing step—combining the learned proposal with a feasible transition law before sampling and importance weighting—is described only at a high level. No explicit equations define the mixing coefficient, the resulting importance weights, or how the procedure preserves unbiasedness or variational consistency with respect to the true hybrid posterior. This mixing is load-bearing for the support-coverage stabilization guarantee and for preventing mode-impurity leakage into the recovery error decomposition.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract presents the mixing at a high level. The explicit definition of the mixing coefficient, the resulting importance weights, and the proof that the procedure preserves unbiasedness and variational consistency appear in Section 3.2 and Appendix B of the full manuscript. We will revise the abstract to include a compact equation for the mixed proposal and a brief statement on support preservation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The three guarantees (support coverage stabilizes filtering; stabilized filter concentrates discrete posterior; mode-pure segments admit sparse port-Hamiltonian recovery) and the clean four-part error decomposition are asserted without derivations, proof sketches, or explicit equations showing how the mixing step yields the claimed concentration or separation. These assertions are central to the paper's contribution but remain unverifiable from the text.

    Authors: The three guarantees and the four-part error decomposition are derived in Section 4 (Theorems 1–2 and Equation 12). We will revise the abstract to add a short parenthetical reference to these results and a one-sentence indication of how the mixing step produces the separation. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that the discrete state yields stronger joint profiles across ARI, change-point F1, and segment purity than post-hoc and mode-free baselines is presented without quantitative tables or statistical details in the provided text, making it difficult to assess the magnitude and robustness of the empirical support for the concentration guarantee.

    Authors: The quantitative results with means, standard deviations, and statistical tests are reported in Table 2 and Figure 4 of the full manuscript. We will update the abstract to include the key numerical improvements and a direct reference to the table. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: guarantees presented as following from support-coverage mechanism without reduction to inputs

full rationale

The abstract defines VHYDRO via mixing of learned proposal with feasible transition law to ensure coverage, then states that three guarantees connect from this mechanism (stabilization of filtering, concentration on coherent regimes, sparse port-Hamiltonian recovery). No equations, fitted-parameter renamings, or self-citations appear that would make any guarantee equivalent to its inputs by construction. The error decomposition into filtering/derivative/mode-impurity/physics-residual parts is presented as a consequence of the mode-pure segments rather than a tautology. The derivation chain remains self-contained against the described mechanism.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; full derivations, assumptions, and any fitted parameters are not visible.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Variational inference can approximate the joint posterior over continuous state and discrete mode
    Implicit in any amortized variational filter
invented entities (1)
  • VHYDRO no independent evidence
    purpose: variational hybrid dynamics learner with support-safe mixing
    New method name and procedure introduced in the paper

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5797 in / 1286 out tokens · 43681 ms · 2026-05-20T21:14:35.613538+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    VHyDRO mixes the learned proposal with a feasible transition law before sampling and importance weighting... Theorem 1 (Support-safe budgeted IW/FIVO increment)... Theorem 3 (Filtering- and mode-robust sparse port-Hamiltonian recovery)

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages · 8 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

    Embed to control: A locally linear latent dynamics model for control from raw images , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

  2. [2]

    World Models

    World models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.10122 , volume=

  3. [3]

    International conference on machine learning , pages=

    Learning latent dynamics for planning from pixels , author=. International conference on machine learning , pages=. 2019 , organization=

  4. [4]

    Nature , volume=

    Mastering diverse control tasks through world models , author=. Nature , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

  5. [5]

    TD-MPC2: Scalable, Robust World Models for Continuous Control

    Td-mpc2: Scalable, robust world models for continuous control , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.16828 , year=

  6. [6]

    Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on machine learning (ICML-11) , pages=

    PILCO: A model-based and data-efficient approach to policy search , author=. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on machine learning (ICML-11) , pages=

  7. [7]

    Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

    Deep reinforcement learning in a handful of trials using probabilistic dynamics models , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

  8. [8]

    Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

    A recurrent latent variable model for sequential data , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

  9. [9]

    Deep Kalman Filters

    Deep kalman filters , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.05121 , year=

  10. [10]

    International conference on machine learning , pages=

    Probabilistic recurrent state-space models , author=. International conference on machine learning , pages=. 2018 , organization=

  11. [11]

    Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

    Filtering variational objectives , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

  12. [12]

    International conference on artificial intelligence and statistics , pages=

    Variational sequential monte carlo , author=. International conference on artificial intelligence and statistics , pages=. 2018 , organization=

  13. [13]

    Sequential Monte Carlo methods in practice , pages=

    An introduction to sequential Monte Carlo methods , author=. Sequential Monte Carlo methods in practice , pages=. 2001 , publisher=

  14. [14]

    Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology , volume=

    Particle markov chain monte carlo methods , author=. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

  15. [15]

    Technometrics , volume=

    Weighted average importance sampling and defensive mixture distributions , author=. Technometrics , volume=. 1995 , publisher=

  16. [16]

    Proceedings of the national academy of sciences , volume=

    Discovering governing equations from data by sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems , author=. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

  17. [17]

    IFAC-PapersOnLine , volume=

    Sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics with control (SINDYc) , author=. IFAC-PapersOnLine , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

  18. [18]

    Science advances , volume=

    Data-driven discovery of partial differential equations , author=. Science advances , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

  19. [19]

    science , volume=

    Distilling free-form natural laws from experimental data , author=. science , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

  20. [20]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=

    Data-driven discovery of coordinates and governing equations , author=. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

  21. [21]

    Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences , volume=

    Rapid Bayesian identification of sparse nonlinear dynamics from scarce and noisy data , author=. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

  22. [22]

    Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering , volume=

    EKF--SINDy: Empowering the extended Kalman filter with sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics , author=. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

  23. [23]

    Neural Networks , pages=

    VENI, VINDy, VICI: a generative reduced-order modeling framework with uncertainty quantification , author=. Neural Networks , pages=. 2026 , publisher=

  24. [24]

    Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

    Neural ordinary differential equations , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

  25. [25]

    Journal of Computational physics , volume=

    Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations , author=. Journal of Computational physics , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

  26. [26]

    Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

    Hamiltonian neural networks , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

  27. [27]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.04630 , year=

    Lagrangian neural networks , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.04630 , year=

  28. [28]

    Deep Lagrangian Networks: Using Physics as Model Prior for Deep Learning

    Deep lagrangian networks: Using physics as model prior for deep learning , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.04490 , year=

  29. [29]

    Physical Review E , volume=

    Port-Hamiltonian neural networks for learning explicit time-dependent dynamical systems , author=. Physical Review E , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

  30. [30]

    Computational Science and Engineering , volume=

    Data-driven identification of latent port-Hamiltonian systems , author=. Computational Science and Engineering , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

  31. [31]

    Artificial intelligence and statistics , pages=

    Bayesian learning and inference in recurrent switching linear dynamical systems , author=. Artificial intelligence and statistics , pages=. 2017 , organization=

  32. [32]

    Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences , volume=

    Model selection for hybrid dynamical systems via sparse regression , author=. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

  33. [33]

    Conference on Robot Learning , pages=

    Contactnets: Learning discontinuous contact dynamics with smooth, implicit representations , author=. Conference on Robot Learning , pages=. 2021 , organization=

  34. [34]

    International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics , pages=

    Learning contact dynamics using physically structured neural networks , author=. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics , pages=. 2021 , organization=

  35. [35]

    International conference on machine learning , pages=

    Graph networks as learnable physics engines for inference and control , author=. International conference on machine learning , pages=. 2018 , organization=

  36. [36]

    Machine Learning: Science and Technology , volume=

    Discovering symbolic laws directly from trajectories with hamiltonian graph neural networks , author=. Machine Learning: Science and Technology , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

  37. [37]

    Conference on Robot Learning , pages=

    Roboturk: A crowdsourcing platform for robotic skill learning through imitation , author=. Conference on Robot Learning , pages=. 2018 , organization=

  38. [38]

    What Matters in Learning from Offline Human Demonstrations for Robot Manipulation

    What matters in learning from offline human demonstrations for robot manipulation , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.03298 , year=

  39. [39]

    Conference on Robot Learning , pages=

    Bridgedata v2: A dataset for robot learning at scale , author=. Conference on Robot Learning , pages=. 2023 , organization=

  40. [40]

    Maniskill2: A unified benchmark for generalizable manipulation skills,

    Maniskill2: A unified benchmark for generalizable manipulation skills , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.04659 , year=

  41. [41]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

    Sapien: A simulated part-based interactive environment , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

  42. [42]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

    Partnet: A large-scale benchmark for fine-grained and hierarchical part-level 3d object understanding , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

  43. [43]

    Deep Variational Bayes Filters: Unsupervised Learning of State Space Models from Raw Data

    Deep variational bayes filters: Unsupervised learning of state space models from raw data , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.06432 , year=

  44. [44]

    Dream to Control: Learning Behaviors by Latent Imagination

    Dream to control: Learning behaviors by latent imagination , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.01603 , year=

  45. [45]

    Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences , volume=

    Bayesian autoencoders for data-driven discovery of coordinates, governing equations and fundamental constants , author=. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

  46. [46]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.20905 , year=

    Veni, vindy, vici: a variational reduced-order modeling framework with uncertainty quantification , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.20905 , year=

  47. [47]

    The Annals of Applied Statistics , pages=

    A sticky HDP-HMM with application to speaker diarization , author=. The Annals of Applied Statistics , pages=. 2011 , publisher=

  48. [48]

    International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering , volume=

    An implicit time-stepping scheme for rigid body dynamics with inelastic collisions and coulomb friction , author=. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering , volume=. 1996 , publisher=

  49. [49]

    Virtual Constraints and Hybrid Zero Dynamics for Realizing Underactuated Bipedal Locomotion

    Virtual constraints and hybrid zero dynamics for realizing underactuated bipedal locomotion , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.01127 , year=

  50. [50]

    Autonomous Robots , volume=

    Impact-invariant control: Maximizing control authority during impacts , author=. Autonomous Robots , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

  51. [51]

    Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences , volume=

    SINDy-PI: a robust algorithm for parallel implicit sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics , author=. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

  52. [52]

    Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

    Interaction networks for learning about objects, relations and physics , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

  53. [53]

    International conference on machine learning , pages=

    Neural relational inference for interacting systems , author=. International conference on machine learning , pages=. 2018 , organization=

  54. [54]

    International conference on machine learning , pages=

    Learning to simulate complex physics with graph networks , author=. International conference on machine learning , pages=. 2020 , organization=

  55. [55]

    Conference on Robot Learning , pages=

    Bayesian object models for robotic interaction with differentiable probabilistic programming , author=. Conference on Robot Learning , pages=. 2023 , organization=

  56. [56]

    International conference on machine learning , pages=

    On calibration of modern neural networks , author=. International conference on machine learning , pages=. 2017 , organization=

  57. [57]

    International conference on machine learning , pages=

    Accurate uncertainties for deep learning using calibrated regression , author=. International conference on machine learning , pages=. 2018 , organization=

  58. [58]

    International Conference on Machine Learning , pages=

    Calibrated model-based deep reinforcement learning , author=. International Conference on Machine Learning , pages=. 2019 , organization=

  59. [59]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

    Sixo: Smoothing inference with twisted objectives , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

  60. [60]

    IFAC-PapersOnLine , volume=

    Learning switching port-Hamiltonian systems with uncertainty quantification , author=. IFAC-PapersOnLine , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

  61. [61]

    Simultaneous analysis of Lasso and Dantzig selector , author=

  62. [62]

    Conference on Learning Theory , pages=

    Reconstruction from anisotropic random measurements , author=. Conference on Learning Theory , pages=. 2012 , organization=