Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Cold Posteriors through PAC-Bayes

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.11173 v1 pith:26ZSYVCM submitted 2022-06-22 cs.LG cs.AIstat.ML

Cold Posteriors through PAC-Bayes

classification cs.LG cs.AIstat.ML
keywords coldpac-bayesposterioreffectobjectiveselbogeneralizationinference
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We investigate the cold posterior effect through the lens of PAC-Bayes generalization bounds. We argue that in the non-asymptotic setting, when the number of training samples is (relatively) small, discussions of the cold posterior effect should take into account that approximate Bayesian inference does not readily provide guarantees of performance on out-of-sample data. Instead, out-of-sample error is better described through a generalization bound. In this context, we explore the connections between the ELBO objective from variational inference and the PAC-Bayes objectives. We note that, while the ELBO and PAC-Bayes objectives are similar, the latter objectives naturally contain a temperature parameter $\lambda$ which is not restricted to be $\lambda=1$. For both regression and classification tasks, in the case of isotropic Laplace approximations to the posterior, we show how this PAC-Bayesian interpretation of the temperature parameter captures the cold posterior effect.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Gaussian Mean Field Variational Inference can Overestimate Predictive Variance

    stat.ML 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    In conjugate BLR, MFVI overestimates expected predictive variance on in-distribution points relative to the exact posterior, with overestimation aligned to training data directions.