Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Fisher consistency for prior probability shift

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1701.05512 v2 pith:2F67MHBS submitted 2017-01-19 stat.ML cs.LGstat.CO

classification stat.MLcs.LGstat.CO
keywords fisherconsistencyprioradjustedcde-iterateclassclassifyconsistent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We introduce Fisher consistency in the sense of unbiasedness as a desirable property for estimators of class prior probabilities. Lack of Fisher consistency could be used as a criterion to dismiss estimators that are unlikely to deliver precise estimates in test datasets under prior probability and more general dataset shift. The usefulness of this unbiasedness concept is demonstrated with three examples of classifiers used for quantification: Adjusted Classify & Count, EM-algorithm and CDE-Iterate. We find that Adjusted Classify & Count and EM-algorithm are Fisher consistent. A counter-example shows that CDE-Iterate is not Fisher consistent and, therefore, cannot be trusted to deliver reliable estimates of class probabilities.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Unsupervised Recalibration

    stat.ML 2019-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Unsupervised recalibration corrects a classifier's probabilities under label-prior shift using only its predictions on unlabeled field data, with per-subpopulation extensions and empirical comparisons.

Pith tools