REVIEW 4 cited by
Validating LLM-Generated Programs with Metamorphic Prompt Testing
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The latest paradigm shift in software development brings in the innovation and automation afforded by Large Language Models (LLMs), showcased by Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT), which has shown remarkable capacity to generate code autonomously, significantly reducing the manual effort required for various programming tasks. Although, the potential benefits of LLM-generated code are vast, most notably in efficiency and rapid prototyping, as LLMs become increasingly integrated into the software development lifecycle and hence the supply chain, complex and multifaceted challenges arise as the code generated from these language models carry profound questions on quality and correctness. Research is required to comprehensively explore these critical concerns surrounding LLM-generated code. In this paper, we propose a novel solution called metamorphic prompt testing to address these challenges. Our intuitive observation is that intrinsic consistency always exists among correct code pieces but may not exist among flawed code pieces, so we can detect flaws in the code by detecting inconsistencies. Therefore, we can vary a given prompt to multiple prompts with paraphrasing, and to ask the LLM to acquire multiple versions of generated code, so that we can validate whether the semantic relations still hold in the acquired code through cross-validation. Our evaluation on HumanEval shows that metamorphic prompt testing is able to detect 75 percent of the erroneous programs generated by GPT-4, with a false positive rate of 8.6 percent.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Falsification-Based Verification of LLM-Generated Optimization Models: Sound Test Batteries and Their Detection Limits
A sound, threshold-free battery of optimization-theoretic tests can catch unfaithful LLM-generated MILP models while never flagging faithful ones, and provably cannot catch certain error classes.
-
VeriSimpl: Robust Optimization Modeling from Natural Language using Simplification-based Verification
VeriSimpl improves natural-language-to-optimization translation by using the solver to generate simplified feasibility and variable-inference queries that an LLM checks against the problem text.
-
Guiding Human Validation of LLM-Generated Code via Verifiable Literate Programming
VLP adds an NL documentation layer with trace-linked mismatch detection and derived formal checks to make human validation of LLM code feasible, lifting pass@1 from 28.7-73.2% to 65.4-93.5%.
-
Bidirectional Empowerment of Metamorphic Testing and Large Language Models: A Systematic Survey
A systematic survey of 93 studies that maps the bidirectional relationship between metamorphic testing and LLMs, proposing a taxonomy for MT applied to LLMs and LLMs applied to MT.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.