pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.07975 · v2 · pith:2HB7GNP7new · submitted 2026-05-08 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex

Phenomenological implications of the high-precision COHERENT germanium CEνNS data

M. Atzori Corona , M. Cadeddu , N. Cargioli , R. Cerulli , G. Co' , F. Dordei , C. Giunti , R. Pavarani This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 22:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-ex
keywords CEνNSCOHERENTweak mixing angleneutrino charge radiinon-standard interactionsneutron radiusquenching factorgermanium
0
0 comments X

The pith

New high-precision CEνNS data on germanium yields updated constraints on the weak mixing angle, neutrino charge radii, and neutron radius while bounding non-standard interactions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper analyzes the latest precise measurements of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering on germanium from the COHERENT experiment. It uses this data, along with previous measurements and reactor data, to refine determinations of fundamental parameters in the Standard Model and nuclear physics. The analysis also explores how uncertainties in the detector's quenching factor affect these extractions and sets limits on possible new neutrino interactions beyond the Standard Model. A sympathetic reader would care because these low-energy neutrino interactions provide a unique window into both particle physics and nuclear structure that is now accessible with better precision than before.

Core claim

By performing a comprehensive fit to the new germanium CEνNS data combined with other COHERENT, reactor, and dark matter experiment results, the authors determine improved values for the weak mixing angle at low momentum transfer, the neutrino charge radii, and the root-mean-square neutron radius of germanium nuclei, while placing robust upper bounds on neutrino non-standard interaction parameters, after accounting for quenching uncertainties through an extended Lindhard model.

What carries the argument

The coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering differential cross section on germanium, combined with a global fit incorporating quenching factor uncertainties via an extended Lindhard parametrization.

If this is right

  • Updated constraint on the weak mixing angle from low-energy neutrino scattering.
  • First detailed extraction of the neutron rms radius in germanium from CEνNS.
  • Tighter bounds on neutrino non-standard interactions from the combined dataset.
  • Assessment showing that quenching uncertainties primarily affect nuclear radius extraction but not SM parameters significantly.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These results could inform the design of next-generation neutrino detectors by highlighting the importance of precise quenching measurements.
  • The bounds on NSI might be used to guide theoretical models of neutrino interactions in beyond-Standard-Model scenarios.
  • Combining with dark matter experiments suggests potential synergies in low-energy physics searches.

Load-bearing premise

The extended Lindhard framework adequately parametrizes quenching-factor uncertainties in the germanium detector response without introducing systematic biases that would affect the extracted nuclear and Standard Model parameters.

What would settle it

A direct measurement of the germanium quenching factor at recoil energies around 1-10 keV that significantly deviates from the extended Lindhard prediction would change the extracted neutron radius and potentially weaken the NSI bounds.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.07975 by C. Giunti, F. Dordei, G. Co', M. Atzori Corona, M. Cadeddu, N. Cargioli, R. Cerulli, R. Pavarani.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Agreement between CE [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Variation of the value of sin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Constraints obtained by fitting simultaneously [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Allowed regions at 90% CL on the electronic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Because the CEνNS cross section probes a coherent superposition of neutrino-nucleon scatter￾ings, it is essentially sensitive to a linear combina￾tion of the up and down quark couplings weighted by the proton and neutron numbers of the target nucleus. This physical dependence manifests as a strong anti-correlation in the parameter space, gen￾erating the observed diagonal bands whose slope is strictly dicta… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Allowed 90% CL regions in the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: for COHERENT Ge 2026 alone, COHERENT CsI+Ar+Ge 2025 and Reactors, and the full combi￾nation. The COHERENT Ge 2026 contour exhibits the characteristic two/four-lobe structure that arises from the quadratic dependence of the CEνNS cross section on the effective neutrino-quark couplings: a flip in both ϵ ee u and ϵ µµ u can leave the total rate ap￾proximately invariant, generating two pairs of de￾generate sol… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This work presents the first comprehensive phenomenological analysis of the newly released Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering (CE$\nu$NS) data on germanium, measured by the COHERENT collaboration at the Spallation Neutron Source. Leveraging the unprecedented precision of this dataset, we provide state-of-the-art determinations of key Standard Model and nuclear physics parameters. Specifically, we extract updated constraints on the weak mixing angle, the neutrino charge radii, and we perform a detailed extraction of the neutron root-mean-square radius of germanium nuclei. We also investigate the impact of quenching factor uncertainties by exploring an extended Lindhard framework, and assess their effect on the extraction of nuclear parameters. Additionally, we use these results to evaluate scenarios beyond the Standard Model, placing robust bounds on neutrino non-standard interactions. To maximize the statistical power and robustness of our findings, whenever possible, we perform a global combined analysis incorporating previous COHERENT measurements along with reactor antineutrino data from the CONUS+, TEXONO, and $\nu$GeN experiments as well as dark-matter experiments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper performs the first comprehensive phenomenological analysis of the new high-precision COHERENT CEνNS data on germanium, extracting updated constraints on sin²θ_W, neutrino charge radii, the neutron rms radius of Ge nuclei, and bounds on neutrino NSI. It incorporates an extended Lindhard model to assess quenching-factor uncertainties, performs a global combined fit with prior COHERENT data plus reactor (CONUS+, TEXONO, νGeN) and dark-matter experiment results, and quantifies the impact of quenching variations on the extracted parameters.

Significance. If the central modeling assumptions hold, the work delivers state-of-the-art determinations of several SM and nuclear parameters from the highest-precision CEνNS dataset to date, with the global analysis providing a clear robustness check. The explicit treatment of quenching uncertainties and the combination with independent datasets are positive features that strengthen the reliability of the reported constraints.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (Quenching model): The extended Lindhard framework is used to convert observed ionization to nuclear recoil energy and to propagate quenching uncertainties into the likelihood. However, the paper provides no external cross-check against independent quenching measurements or alternative functional forms at the lowest recoil energies (where the CEνNS signal peaks), leaving open the possibility that the chosen parametrization introduces a systematic shift in the extracted neutron rms radius and sin²θ_W.
  2. [§5] §5 (Neutron radius extraction): The quoted uncertainty on the Ge neutron rms radius is derived after marginalizing over the extended Lindhard parameters, but the manuscript does not show the shift in the central value or the change in χ² when the quenching model is replaced by an independent parametrization (e.g., from direct calibration data). This omission makes it difficult to judge whether the reported precision is robust or dominated by the modeling choice.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figure 4] Figure 4: the color coding for the different data sets in the combined fit is not explained in the caption, making it hard to identify which curve corresponds to the germanium-only versus global analysis.
  2. [Table 2] Table 2: the column headers for the NSI parameters should explicitly state the 90 % CL intervals rather than leaving the reader to infer the convention from the text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments, which have helped us strengthen the presentation of our results. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to improve the discussion of quenching uncertainties and the robustness checks for the neutron radius extraction.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (Quenching model): The extended Lindhard framework is used to convert observed ionization to nuclear recoil energy and to propagate quenching uncertainties into the likelihood. However, the paper provides no external cross-check against independent quenching measurements or alternative functional forms at the lowest recoil energies (where the CEνNS signal peaks), leaving open the possibility that the chosen parametrization introduces a systematic shift in the extracted neutron rms radius and sin²θ_W.

    Authors: We agree that explicit external cross-checks strengthen the analysis. In the revised manuscript we have expanded Section 3 with references to independent low-energy quenching measurements from direct calibration experiments and performed a comparison with an alternative functional form drawn from the literature. The comparison shows that the central values of the extracted parameters shift by less than 1σ and that the overall conclusions remain unchanged. We have also added a short paragraph quantifying the residual systematic uncertainty associated with the quenching model choice. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§5] §5 (Neutron radius extraction): The quoted uncertainty on the Ge neutron rms radius is derived after marginalizing over the extended Lindhard parameters, but the manuscript does not show the shift in the central value or the change in χ² when the quenching model is replaced by an independent parametrization (e.g., from direct calibration data). This omission makes it difficult to judge whether the reported precision is robust or dominated by the modeling choice.

    Authors: We acknowledge that an explicit comparison would make the robustness clearer. We have added to the revised Section 5 a new table that reports the central value and Δχ² for the germanium neutron rms radius obtained with our default extended Lindhard model versus an alternative parametrization based on direct calibration data. The shifts are modest and lie well within the quoted uncertainty, confirming that the precision is not dominated by the specific modeling choice. The marginalization procedure is also described more explicitly. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation relies on external data and standard models

full rationale

The paper conducts a global fit of the new high-precision COHERENT germanium CEνNS spectrum (combined with prior COHERENT, CONUS+, TEXONO, νGeN, and dark-matter data) to extract sin²θ_W, neutrino charge radii, Ge neutron rms radius, and NSI bounds. Quenching uncertainties are propagated by varying parameters inside an extended Lindhard parametrization, but this is an uncertainty assessment rather than a self-defining fit. No quoted equation or step shows a quantity being fitted to a subset of the same data and then presented as an independent prediction, nor does any central result reduce by construction to a self-citation whose content is unverified. The analysis remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on Standard Model assumptions for CEνNS, nuclear form-factor models, and the validity of the extended Lindhard quenching description; one free parameter set is introduced to explore quenching uncertainties.

free parameters (1)
  • extended Lindhard quenching parameters
    Introduced to assess impact of quenching uncertainties on extracted nuclear parameters; specific values not stated in abstract.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Standard Model framework governs CEνNS cross section
    Used to extract weak mixing angle and neutrino charge radii from the data.
  • domain assumption Nuclear form factors and neutron distribution can be parametrized independently of the fit
    Required for the neutron rms radius extraction.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5751 in / 1420 out tokens · 41787 ms · 2026-05-20T22:38:33.018376+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. New constraints on physics within and beyond the standard model from the latest CONUS datasets

    hep-ex 2026-05 conditional novelty 4.0

    New reactor antineutrino data from CONUS germanium detectors improve upper limits on neutrino magnetic moment to 5.18e-11 mu_B, millicharge to 1.76e-12 e0, NSI scale to 145 GeV, and yield sin^2 theta_W = 0.28 +0.03/-0...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 85 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 13 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Measure- ment of coherent elastic neutrino nucleus scat- tering on germanium by COHERENT,

    M. Adhikari et al. (COHERENT), “Measure- ment of coherent elastic neutrino nucleus scat- tering on germanium by COHERENT,” (2026), arXiv:2603.17951 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    Adamski et al

    S. Adamski et al. (COHERENT), Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 231801 (2025)

    work page 2025

  3. [3]

    Atzori Corona, M

    M. Atzori Corona, M. Cadeddu, N. Cargioli, G. Co’, F. Dordei, and C. Giunti, Phys. Lett. B869, 139856 (2025), arXiv:2506.13555 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    New Physics ver- sus Quenching Factors in Coherent Neutrino Scat- tering,

    Y. Li, G. Herrera, and P. Huber, “New Physics ver- sus Quenching Factors in Coherent Neutrino Scat- tering,” (2025), arXiv:2502.12308 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    J. Liao, D. Marfatia, and J. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 110, 055040 (2024), arXiv:2408.06255 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    D. Z. Freedman, Phys. Rev. D9, 1389 (1974)

    work page 1974

  7. [7]

    De Romeri, D.K

    V. De Romeri, D. K. Papoulias, F. Pompa, G. Sanchez Garcia, and C. A. Ternes, “Testing light and heavy vector mediators with solar CEvNS mea- 10 surements,” (2026), arXiv:2603.00554 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  8. [8]

    Neutrino electromagnetic properties and sterile dipole por- tal in light of the first solar CEνNS data,

    V. De Romeri, D. K. Papoulias, G. Sanchez Gar- cia, C. A. Ternes, and M. T´ ortola, “Neutrino electromagnetic properties and sterile dipole por- tal in light of the first solar CEνNS data,” (2024), arXiv:2412.14991 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    Coloma, I

    P. Coloma, I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, L. Larizgoitia, F. Monrabal, and S. Palomares- Ruiz, JHEP05, 037 (2022), arXiv:2202.10829 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  10. [10]

    Demirci and M.F

    M. Demirci and M. F. Mustamin, Phys. Rev. D109, 015021 (2024), arXiv:2312.17502 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  11. [11]

    Demirci and M

    M. Demirci and M. F. Mustamin, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 1 (2025), arXiv:2412.03140 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    De Romeri, O.G

    V. De Romeri, O. G. Miranda, D. K. Papoulias, G. Sanchez Garcia, M. T´ ortola, and J. W. F. Valle, JHEP04, 035 (2023), arXiv:2211.11905 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  13. [13]

    Ackermann et al.,Direct observation of coherent elastic antineutrino–nucleus scattering, Nature643(2025) 1229 [2501.05206]

    N. Ackermann et al., “First observation of reac- tor antineutrinos by coherent scattering,” (2025), arXiv:2501.05206 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Measurement of the Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering Cross Section on CsI by COHERENT,

    D. Akimov et al., “Measurement of the Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering Cross Section on CsI by COHERENT,” (2021), arXiv:2110.07730 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2021

  15. [15]

    Akimov et al

    D. Akimov et al. (COHERENT), Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 012002 (2021), arXiv:2003.10630 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2021

  16. [16]

    COHERENT Collaboration data release from the first detection of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering on ar- gon,

    D. Akimov et al. (COHERENT), “COHERENT Collaboration data release from the first detection of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering on ar- gon,” (2020), arXiv:2006.12659 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2020

  17. [17]

    Yang, Y.F

    S. Karmakar et al. (TEXONO), Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 121802 (2025), arXiv:2411.18812 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Belov et al

    V. Belov et al. ((νGeN),), Chin. Phys. C49, 053004 (2025), arXiv:2502.18502 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    Aprile et al

    E. Aprile et al. (XENON), Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 191002 (2024), arXiv:2408.02877 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    Bo et al

    Z. Bo et al. (PandaX), Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 191001 (2024), arXiv:2407.10892 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Searches for Light Dark Matter and Evidence of Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering of Solar Neutrinos with the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment,

    D. S. Akerib et al. (LZ), “Searches for Light Dark Matter and Evidence of Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering of Solar Neutrinos with the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment,” (2025), arXiv:2512.08065 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    S. S. Chatterjee, S. Lavignac, O. G. Miranda, and G. Sanchez Garcia, Phys. Rev. D107, 055019 (2023), arXiv:2208.11771 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering at the Japan Proton Accelerator Research Complex

    J. I. Collar et al., “Coherent Elastic Neutrino- Nucleus Scattering at the Japan Proton Accelera- tor Research Complex,” (2025), arXiv:2512.19788 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Chattaraj, A

    A. Chattaraj, A. Majumdar, D. K. Papou- lias, and R. Srivastava, JHEP05, 064 (2025), arXiv:2501.12443 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Sensitivity enhancement techniques for cryogenic calorime- ters in the NUCLEUS experiment,

    M. Cappelli et al. (NUCLEUS), “Sensitivity enhancement techniques for cryogenic calorime- ters in the NUCLEUS experiment,” (2026), arXiv:2603.28276 [physics.ins-det]

    work page arXiv 2026

  26. [26]

    Atzori Corona, M

    M. Atzori Corona, M. Cadeddu, N. Cargioli, F. Dordei, C. Giunti, and R. Pavarani, Universe 11, 416 (2025), arXiv:2509.04205 [physics.ins-det]

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    Prospect of the NU- CLEUS Experiment at Chooz for Coherent Elas- tic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering and New Physics Searches,

    H. Abele et al. (NUCLEUS), “Prospect of the NU- CLEUS Experiment at Chooz for Coherent Elas- tic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering and New Physics Searches,” (2026), arXiv:2603.24450 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2026

  28. [28]

    Cadeddu, F

    M. Cadeddu, F. Dordei, and C. Giunti, EPL143, 34001 (2023), arXiv:2307.08842 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  29. [29]

    Berglund and M

    M. Berglund and M. E. Wieser, Pure and Applied Chemistry83, 397 (2011)

    work page 2011

  30. [30]

    Abdel Khaleq, J

    R. Abdel Khaleq, J. L. Newstead, C. Simenel, and A. E. Stuchbery, Phys. Rev. D111, 033003 (2025), arXiv:2405.20060 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    Axial-vector neutral-current measurements in coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering experiments,

    D. Aristizabal Sierra, P. M. Candela, V. De Romeri, D. K. Papoulias, and L. T. S, “Axial-vector neutral-current measurements in coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering experiments,” (2026), arXiv:2603.05281 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  32. [32]

    Atzori Corona, M

    M. Atzori Corona, M. Cadeddu, N. Cargioli, F. Dordei, C. Giunti, and G. Masia, Eur. Phys. J. C83, 683 (2023), arXiv:2303.09360 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  33. [33]

    The Weak Neutral Current

    J. Erler and S. Su, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.71, 119 (2013), arXiv:1303.5522 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  34. [34]

    Navas et al

    S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    M. A. Corona, M. Cadeddu, N. Cargioli, F. Dordei, and C. Giunti, Phys. Rev. D112, 015007 (2025)

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    Neutrino Electromagnetic Prop- erties,

    C. Giunti, K. Kouzakov, Y.-F. Li, and A. Stu- denikin, “Neutrino Electromagnetic Properties,” (2024), arXiv:2411.03122 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    Average CsI neutron density distribution from COHERENT data

    M. Cadeddu, C. Giunti, Y. F. Li, and Y. Y. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 072501 (2018), arXiv:1710.02730 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  38. [38]

    R. H. Helm, Phys. Rev.104, 1466 (1956)

    work page 1956

  39. [39]

    The power of two: Assessing the impact of a second measurement of the weak-charge form factor of 208Pb

    J. Piekarewicz, A. R. Linero, P. Giuliani, and E. Chicken, Phys. Rev. C94, 034316 (2016), arXiv:1604.07799 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  40. [40]

    Exclusive Vector Meson Production in Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions

    S. Klein and J. Nystrand, Phys. Rev. C60, 014903 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9902259

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  41. [41]

    Friedrich and N

    J. Friedrich and N. Voegler, Nucl. Phys. A373, 192 (1982)

    work page 1982

  42. [42]

    Fricke, C

    G. Fricke, C. Bernhardt, K. Heilig, L. A. Schaller, L. Schellenberg, E. B. Shera, and C. W. de Jager, Atom. Data Nucl. Data Tabl.60, 177 (1995)

    work page 1995

  43. [43]

    Nuclear charge radii 32ge germanium: Datasheet from landolt-bornstein - group i elementary particles, nuclei and atoms, vol- ume 20,

    G. Fricke and K. Heilig, “Nuclear charge radii 32ge germanium: Datasheet from landolt-bornstein - group i elementary particles, nuclei and atoms, vol- ume 20,” (2004), copyright 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

    work page 2004

  44. [44]

    Angeli and K

    I. Angeli and K. P. Marinova, Atom. Data Nucl. Data Tabl.99, 69 (2013)

    work page 2013

  45. [45]

    Cadeddu, F

    M. Cadeddu, F. Dordei, C. Giunti, Y. F. Li, E. Pic- ciau, and Y. Y. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D102, 015030 (2020), arXiv:2005.01645 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  46. [46]

    Hoferichter, J

    M. Hoferichter, J. Men´ endez, and A. Schwenk, Phys. Rev. D102, 074018 (2020), arXiv:2007.08529 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  47. [47]

    G. Co, M. Anguiano, and A. M. Lallena, Phys. Rev. C104, 014313 (2021), arXiv:2107.09938 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  48. [48]

    J. F. Berger, M. Girod, and D. Gogny, Comput. 11 Phys. Commun.63, 365 (1991)

    work page 1991

  49. [49]

    Chabanat, P

    E. Chabanat, P. Bonche, P. Haensel, J. Meyer, and R. Schaeffer, Nucl. Phys. A635, 231 (1998), [Erra- tum: Nucl.Phys.A 643, 441–441 (1998)]

    work page 1998

  50. [50]

    Atzori Corona, M

    M. Atzori Corona, M. Cadeddu, N. Cargioli, F. Dordei, C. Giunti, Y. F. Li, E. Picciau, C. A. Ternes, and Y. Y. Zhang, JHEP05, 109 (2022), arXiv:2202.11002 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  51. [51]

    Akimov et al

    D. Akimov et al. (COHERENT), Phys. Rev. D106, 032003 (2022), arXiv:2109.11049 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  52. [52]

    Colaresi, J

    J. Colaresi, J. I. Collar, T. W. Hossbach, C. M. Lewis, and K. M. Yocum, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 211802 (2022), arXiv:2202.09672 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  53. [53]

    Atzori Corona, M

    M. Atzori Corona, M. Cadeddu, N. Cargioli, F. Dordei, and C. Giunti, Phys. Lett. B852, 138627 (2024), arXiv:2307.12911 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  54. [54]

    Lindhard, V

    J. Lindhard, V. Nielsen, M. Scharff, and P. V. Thomsen, Kgl. Danske Videnskab., Selskab. Mat. Fys. Medd.33, 10(1963)

    work page 1963

  55. [55]

    Latest Germanium Results From the COHERENT Collaboration,

    R. Bouabid (COHERENT), “Latest Germanium Results From the COHERENT Collaboration,” (2026), presentation at the wine and cheese semi- nar

    work page 2026

  56. [56]

    An Accurate Determina- tion of the Neutron Skin Thickness of 208Pb through Parity-Violation in Electron Scattering,

    D. Adhikari et al. (PREX), Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 172502 (2021), arXiv:2102.10767 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2021

  57. [57]

    P. L. Anthony et al. (SLAC E158), Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 081601 (2005), hep-ex/0504049 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  58. [58]

    Wang et al

    D. Wang et al. (PVDIS), Nature506, 67 (2014)

    work page 2014

  59. [59]

    Androic et al

    D. Androic et al. (Qweak), Nature557, 207 (2018)

    work page 2018

  60. [60]

    When backgrounds be- come signals: neutrino interactions in xenon-based dark matter detectors,

    M. Atzori Corona, M. Cadeddu, N. Cargioli, F. Dordei, and M. Sestu, “When backgrounds be- come signals: neutrino interactions in xenon-based dark matter detectors,” (2025), arXiv:2509.22178 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    Measurement of Neutrino-Electron Scattering Cross-Section with a CsI(Tl) Scintillating Crystal Array at the Kuo-Sheng Nuclear Power Reactor

    M. Deniz et al. (TEXONO), Phys. Rev. D81, 072001 (2010), arXiv:0911.1597 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  62. [62]

    L. B. Auerbach et al. (LSND), Phys. Rev. D63, 112001 (2001), arXiv:hep-ex/0101039

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  63. [63]

    R. C. Allen, H. H. Chen, P. J. Doe, R. Hausam- mann, W. P. Lee, X. Q. Lu, H. J. Mahler, M. E. Potter, K. C. Wang, T. J. Bowles, R. L. Burman, R. D. Carlini, D. R. F. Cochran, J. S. Frank, E. Pi- asetzky, V. D. Sandberg, D. A. Krakauer, and R. L. Talaga, Phys. Rev. D47, 11 (1993)

    work page 1993

  64. [64]

    First Dark Matter Search Results from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment

    J. Aalbers et al. (LZ), Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 041002 (2023), arXiv:2207.03764 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  65. [65]

    Zhang et al

    D. Zhang et al. (PandaX), Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 161804 (2022), arXiv:2206.02339 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  66. [66]

    Aprile et al

    E. Aprile et al. (XENON), Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 161805 (2022), arXiv:2207.11330 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  67. [67]

    Atzori Corona, M

    M. Atzori Corona, M. Cadeddu, N. Cargioli, F. Dordei, and C. Giunti, JHEP05, 271 (2024), arXiv:2402.16709 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  68. [68]

    Cadeddu, C

    M. Cadeddu, C. Giunti, K. A. Kouzakov, Y.-F. Li, Y.-Y. Zhang, and A. I. Studenikin, Phys. Rev. D98, 113010 (2018), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 101, 059902 (2020)], arXiv:1810.05606 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2018

  69. [69]

    On the charge radius of the neutrino

    J. Bernabeu, L. G. Cabral-Rosetti, J. Papavassil- iou, and J. Vidal, Phys. Rev. D62, 113012 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/0008114

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  70. [70]

    Bernabeu, J

    J. Bernabeu, J. Papavassiliou, and J. Vi- dal, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 101802 (2002), [Erra- tum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 89, 229902 (2002)], arXiv:hep- ph/0206015

    work page arXiv 2002

  71. [71]

    Atzori Corona, M

    M. Atzori Corona, M. Cadeddu, N. Cargioli, F. Dordei, C. Giunti, and C. A. Ternes, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 231803 (2025), arXiv:2504.05272 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  72. [72]

    K. W. Jones and H. W. Kraner, Phys. Rev. A11, 1347 (1975)

    work page 1975

  73. [73]

    K. W. Jones and H. W. Kraner, Phys. Rev. C4, 125 (1971)

    work page 1971

  74. [74]

    C. E. Aalseth et al. (CoGeNT), Phys. Rev. D88, 012002 (2013), arXiv:1208.5737 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  75. [75]

    M. F. Albakry et al. (SuperCDMS), Phys. Rev. D 105, 122002 (2022), arXiv:2202.07043 [physics.ins- det]

    work page arXiv 2022

  76. [76]

    Bonhomme et al.,Direct measurement of the ionization quenching factor of nuclear recoils in germanium in the keV energy range,Eur

    A. Bonhomme et al., Eur. Phys. J. C82, 815 (2022), arXiv:2202.03754 [physics.ins-det]

    work page arXiv 2022

  77. [77]

    J. I. Collar, A. R. L. Kavner, and C. M. Lewis, Phys. Rev. D103, 122003 (2021), arXiv:2102.10089 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2021

  78. [78]

    J. Liao, H. Liu, and D. Marfatia, Phys. Rev. D104, 015005 (2021), arXiv:2104.01811 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  79. [79]

    Aristizabal Sierra, V

    D. Aristizabal Sierra, V. De Romeri, and D. K. Papoulias, JHEP09, 076 (2022), arXiv:2203.02414 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  80. [80]

    Atomic limits in the search for galactic dark matter

    P. Sorensen, Phys. Rev. D91, 083509 (2015), arXiv:1412.3028 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

Showing first 80 references.