Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Strong hallucinations from negation and how to fix them

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.10543 v2 pith:2JDO5NGC submitted 2024-02-16 cs.CL cs.AI

Strong hallucinations from negation and how to fix them

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords negationrepresentationstheyhallucinationslanguagelatentlogicalperformance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Despite great performance on many tasks, language models (LMs) still struggle with reasoning, sometimes providing responses that cannot possibly be true because they stem from logical incoherence. We call such responses \textit{strong hallucinations} and prove that they follow from an LM's computation of its internal representations for logical operators and outputs from those representations. Focusing on negation, we provide a novel solution in which negation is treated not as another element of a latent representation, but as \textit{an operation over an LM's latent representations that constrains how they may evolve}. We show that our approach improves model performance in cloze prompting and natural language inference tasks with negation without requiring training on sparse negative data.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Investigating Symbolic Triggers of Hallucination in Gemma Models Across HaluEval and TruthfulQA

    cs.CL 2025-09 reject novelty 5.0

    Symbolic triggers like modifiers and named entities keep Gemma hallucination rates at 64-79% across model scales, suggesting larger models do not eliminate this failure mode.