REVIEW 14 cited by
Do Large Language Models Know What They Don't Know?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Do Large Language Models Know What They Don't Know?
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have a wealth of knowledge that allows them to excel in various Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. Current research focuses on enhancing their performance within their existing knowledge. Despite their vast knowledge, LLMs are still limited by the amount of information they can accommodate and comprehend. Therefore, the ability to understand their own limitations on the unknows, referred to as self-knowledge, is of paramount importance. This study aims to evaluate LLMs' self-knowledge by assessing their ability to identify unanswerable or unknowable questions. We introduce an automated methodology to detect uncertainty in the responses of these models, providing a novel measure of their self-knowledge. We further introduce a unique dataset, SelfAware, consisting of unanswerable questions from five diverse categories and their answerable counterparts. Our extensive analysis, involving 20 LLMs including GPT-3, InstructGPT, and LLaMA, discovering an intrinsic capacity for self-knowledge within these models. Moreover, we demonstrate that in-context learning and instruction tuning can further enhance this self-knowledge. Despite this promising insight, our findings also highlight a considerable gap between the capabilities of these models and human proficiency in recognizing the limits of their knowledge.
Forward citations
Cited by 14 Pith papers
-
Can LLM Rerankers Predict Their Own Ranking Performance?
LLM rerankers can internally predict ranking quality via self-consistency of sampled outputs, matching SOTA external QPP while direct confidence is overconfident; supervised token-efficient methods improve calibration.
-
SciPredict: Can LLMs Predict the Outcomes of Scientific Experiments in Natural Sciences?
LLMs predict outcomes of real scientific experiments at 14-26% accuracy, comparable to human experts, but lack calibration on prediction reliability while humans demonstrate strong calibration.
-
Think Through a Bottleneck: Hourglass Reasoning for Rigorous Induction
Strict stage isolation that passes only a compressed symbolic schema and rule between LLM calls improves few-shot inductive reasoning more than self-refinement or explicit verbalization alone.
-
Look-Closer-Then-Diagnose: Confidence-Aware Ultrasound VQA via Active Zooming
Introduces Zoom-then-Diagnose paradigm and uncertainty-aware reward in GRPO for confidence-aware ultrasound VQA, reporting 39.3% improvement in lesion localization across liver, breast, and thyroid datasets.
-
Look-Closer-Then-Diagnose: Confidence-Aware Ultrasound VQA via Active Zooming
A structured Zoom-then-Diagnose paradigm with uncertainty-aware GRPO rewards improves lesion localization by 39.3% on liver, breast, and thyroid ultrasound VQA datasets by encouraging caution under ambiguity.
-
ASPI: Seeking Ambiguity Clarification Amplifies Prompt Injection Vulnerability in LLM Agents
Clarification-seeking in LLM agents amplifies prompt injection attack success from ~2% to over 30% across ten frontier models in a new 728-scenario benchmark.
-
LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own Generations
LLMs show measurable self-recognition that linearly correlates with self-preference bias in evaluations, supported by fine-tuning experiments and controls for confounders.
-
BaRA: Bayesian Adaptive Rank Allocation for Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning
BaRA adds Bayesian adaptive rank allocation to LoRA fine-tuning by activating sparse instance-specific latent factors, with a generalization bound depending on learned joint effective rank rather than fixed maximum rank.
-
SingGuard: A Policy-Adaptive Multimodal LLM Guardrail with Dynamic Reasoning
SingGuard presents a policy-adaptive multimodal LLM guardrail family with hybrid reasoning regimes and a new benchmark of 56,340 examples, claiming SOTA F1 across 35 datasets and improved policy adherence under runtim...
-
SingGuard: A Policy-Adaptive Multimodal LLM Guardrail with Dynamic Reasoning
SingGuard introduces a policy-adaptive multimodal LLM guardrail with dynamic reasoning regimes and SingGuard-Bench, reporting SOTA F1 scores across 35 datasets and improved policy-following accuracy under runtime shifts.
-
Lost in Context: Addressing Context Anxiety in Large Language Models
Context anxiety — abandoning solvable tasks over perceived token limits — is measurable and reducible by fine-tuning on anxiety-free reasoning traces, but the paper's causal mechanism is not actually tested.
-
Learning from AVA: Early Lessons from a Curated and Trustworthy Generative AI for Policy and Development Research
AVA is a specialized GenAI platform for development policy research that provides verifiable syntheses from World Bank reports and is associated with 2.4-3.9 hours of weekly time savings in a large-scale user evaluation.
-
TrustLLM: Trustworthiness in Large Language Models
TrustLLM defines eight trustworthiness principles, creates a six-dimension benchmark, and evaluates 16 LLMs showing proprietary models generally lead but some open-source ones are close while over-calibration can hurt...
-
Machine Psychometrics: A Mathematical Psychology of Artificial Intelligence
Proposes Machine Psychometrics and the Machine Mindprint as a measurement science for behavioral and metacognitive traits in artificial agents to support deployment decisions.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.