Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

A Lorentzian path integral with shell and brane defects counts de Sitter microstates, yielding the horizon-area entropy law.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 22:33 UTC pith:2LTA7HWY

load-bearing objection New Lorentzian wormhole route to the dS and SdS area laws; worth refereeing, but the leading 1/4 exponent leans on an unproven measure-factor assumption the authors themselves flag. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2511.09624 v3 pith:2LTA7HWY submitted 2025-11-12 hep-th

Microstate counting from defects in de Sitter

Jan de Boer , Diego Liska , Kamran Salehi Vaziri This is my paper
classification hep-th MSC 83C4583C57 PACS 04.60.-m04.70.-s
keywords de Sitter entropymicrostate countingLorentzian path integralthin shellsend-of-the-world branesconical singularitiesSchwarzschild-de Sitterarea law
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tries to establish that the microscopic origin of de Sitter entropy can be understood directly in Lorentzian signature. It constructs microstates as configurations of thin shells or end-of-the-world branes, defines their overlaps via the gravitational path integral, and shows that the connected part of the overlap variance is dominated by Lorentzian wormhole topologies with conical singularities. Evaluating these saddles gives a variance that scales as exp(-A_c/4G), which implies the Hilbert space dimension is log dim H_dS = A_c/4G + O(log G). For Schwarzschild-de Sitter the same argument gives log dim H_SdS = (A_c + A_b)/4G + O(log G), so both horizons contribute. A sympathetic reader would care because this provides a concrete microstate-counting mechanism for cosmological horizons, in a purely Lorentzian framework without relying on Euclidean continuation.

Core claim

The central claim is that the variance of microstate overlaps, R_ij R_ji, is dominated not by smooth Lorentzian geometries but by complex saddles effectively described as double covers of de Sitter with a conical surplus of 4π at the cosmological horizon. This yields R_ij R_ji ~ exp(-A_c/4G), and hence log(dim H_dS) = A_c/4G + O(log G). The same construction for Schwarzschild-de Sitter, with two defects and two conical singularities, gives log(dim H_SdS) = (A_c + A_b)/4G + O(log G). The paper argues these variances are exactly what one expects from a finite-dimensional Hilbert space of dimension e^S with pseudorandom overlaps, so the area law is the statistical signature of microstate counti

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Lorentzian wormhole with a conical singularity: a double cover of the spacetime glued along a branch cut ending at a codimension-two surface, carrying a surplus angle of 4π. This is the Lorentzian effective description of a smooth complex geometry that allows topology change. The conical singularity contributes a real, negative term -A/(4G) to the action exponent, suppressing the overlap variance. A fixed-area saddle prescription selects the extremal area of the defect; the singularity attaches to the outermost shell for the cosmological horizon and to the black hole throat for the black hole horizon. From the suppressed overlaps, a resolvent analysis of the Gr

Load-bearing premise

The derivation assumes that the unknown measure factor multiplying the fixed-area path integral contributes only subleading (order log G) corrections; if it contributed at order 1/G, the exponent in the variance—and hence the entropy—would change.

What would settle it

Perform a one-loop evaluation of the fixed-area path integral for a simple Lorentzian wormhole saddle, e.g., in a two-dimensional de Sitter model, and check whether the measure factor contributes a term of order 1/G. If it does, the predicted variance exp(-A/4G) and the area-law entropy would fail.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The dimension of the de Sitter Hilbert space is finite and equals e^{A_c/4G} at leading order, so the Gibbons–Hawking entropy is a count of observer-indistinguishable microstates.
  • For Schwarzschild–de Sitter, the entropy is the sum of the cosmological and black hole horizon areas divided by 4G, matching the Bekenstein–Hawking plus Gibbons–Hawking contributions.
  • Both thin-shell and end-of-the-world brane constructions give the same variance and entropy, showing the result is insensitive to the defect type.
  • States near the cosmological horizon dominate the count, and additional internal labels or multiple shells can populate that window without violating the semiclassical approximation.
  • A worldvolume with multiple observers has a smaller horizon area and thus a smaller entropy, so the count depends on the observer's causal diamond.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the unknown measure factor in the fixed-area integral turns out to contribute at order 1/G, the entropy exponent would shift and the area law as derived would have to be corrected; the paper's own discussion flags this as the main open technical assumption.
  • The result suggests that de Sitter quantum gravity has a finite-dimensional Hilbert space with random-matrix-like overlap statistics, so late-time correlation functions and spectral form factors in de Sitter might exhibit ramp-and-plateau behavior analogous to closed-universe models.
  • The NEC-violating infalling shell that satisfies the AANEC provides a concrete, semiclassically consistent building block; a UV completion of such shells could anchor the M→0 limit that recovers empty de Sitter entropy at fixed cosmological constant.
  • The Lorentzian derivation sidesteps the absence of smooth Euclidean sections for Schwarzschild–de Sitter, so similar wormhole counting may extend to spacetimes with multiple horizons or higher genus topologies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a Lorentzian path-integral framework for counting de Sitter microstates. States are prepared by inserting thin shells or end-of-the-world branes outside an observer's static patch. The authors argue that the variance of microstate overlaps is dominated by Lorentzian wormhole topologies with conical ('crotch') singularities, and that evaluating the singular contribution to the Einstein-Hilbert action gives R_ij R_ji ~ exp(-A_c/4G). From this, via a random-matrix/Gram-matrix argument, they infer log dim H_dS = A_c/4G + O(log G), and analogously log dim H_SdS = (A_c + A_b)/4G + O(log G). Section 3 derives junction conditions and checks NEC and matching-background conditions; Section 4 computes the wormhole amplitudes. The paper candidly lists several unresolved assumptions.

Significance. If the result holds, it would give a Lorentzian derivation of the Gibbons-Hawking and Bekenstein-Hawking area laws from a microscopic counting perspective, going beyond Euclidean saddles. The paper's explicit calculation of the conical-singularity action (App. D), the detailed Israel junction analysis, and the numerical construction of defect solutions are valuable. The paper also carefully delineates the assumptions that would be needed for a UV completion. It does not fit parameters to produce the area law; the 1/4G coefficient comes from the action of the conical surplus, which is a nontrivial and appealing feature.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 4.1, Eq. (4.21)] The central exponent -(n-1)A/4G in the fixed-area path integral is derived from the singular action alone, but the integral over A in (4.20) contains an unknown measure factor. The text explicitly states 'there is an unknown measure factor ... we assume that this measure factor gives only subleading corrections.' This assumption is load-bearing: if the measure contributes e^{cA/G}, the saddle shifts and the coefficient in (4.25) and hence in (1.6)-(1.7) changes. No independent argument for c=0 is given. The claim requires either a one-loop computation or a test in a controlled model (e.g., dS JT).
  2. [Sec. 4.3, Eq. (4.35)] The threshold N ~ exp(A_c/4G) is presented as the solution of a Schwinger-Dyson equation, but the equation and its solution are not shown; only references to AdS literature are given. Since this is the step that converts the variance (4.25) into a Hilbert-space dimension, the reader cannot check that the RMT ensemble, the neglect of non-planar geometries, and the normalization of (4.34) all have the claimed consequences. Please include the SD equation, the large-N scaling, and a justification of planarity in dS.
  3. [Secs. 3.3-3.5] The paper's own classification shows that no explicit microstate configuration satisfies both the NEC and the matching-background condition. The de Sitter shell solutions that satisfy the NEC require unequal cosmological constants; the SdS solutions with a single cosmological constant violate the NEC on one shell (though AANEC is argued). The entropy computation in Sec. 4 does not depend on these conditions, so the counting is over a formal set of path-integral configurations. For the claim to be a 'microscopic origin' of entropy, the physical status of these states needs to be clarified.
  4. [Sec. 4.3, para. after (4.38)] The saturation at N ~ e^{A/4G} presumes the existence of e^{A/4G} distinct defect states. The paper appeals to 'internal labels' not present in the effective description ('we expect the shells to carry additional internal labels'). Without a construction or a bound on the number of such labels, the count is an assumption. This is not a flaw if stated as an axiom, but it should be explicit in the main derivation.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (3.29)] The metric line has a typo: 'dr^2/f(r) dr^2' should be 'dr^2/f(r)'.
  2. [Sec. 4.2 heading] The heading 'Schwarzchild-de Sitter' should be 'Schwarzschild-de Sitter'.
  3. [Sec. 4.3] Typo: 'the the most orthogonal' should read 'the most orthogonal'.
  4. [Abstract/Introduction] Several missing spaces occur, e.g., 'branesand', 'Thin shells'.
  5. [Figure captions 3/4] The definition of c via c=4πGσ appears only in the caption of Fig. 3; it would help to state the dimensionality and normalizations in the main text.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the area law emerges from the conical-singularity action, not from a fitted input or self-citation.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained in the relevant sense. States are defined by Lorentzian path integrals with defect boundary conditions; the connected overlap variance is computed by summing crotch/wormhole topologies, with the conical-singularity action contributing exp(−(n−1)A/4G) (Eqs. 4.13–4.18); the Gram-matrix rank then gives log N = A/4G via the random-matrix resolvent. At no point is the Gibbons–Hawking or Bekenstein–Hawking entropy used as an input, and no parameter is fitted to reproduce the area law. The coefficient 1/4 comes from the explicit delta-function evaluation in Sec. 4.1 and Appendix D, not from a normalization choice. The main self-citations ([15], [19], [70]) appear in broad context lists or in a contrast with QFT Hilbert spaces and are not load-bearing for the variance computation. The most important caveat is the paper's explicit assumption in Sec. 4.1 that the unknown measure factor in the fixed-area integral (4.20)–(4.21) contributes only subleading corrections. This is a genuine limitation that could affect the leading exponent if false, but it is an unverified assumption, not a circular reduction: the paper does not tune that factor to match the desired area law. Similarly, the restriction to shells near the cosmological horizon is an explicit choice in Sec. 4.3, not an input secretly equivalent to the output. Overall, no circular step is exhibited.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central derivation rests on several external frameworks and unproven assumptions, the most fragile being the fixed-area measure factor, the observer-dependent topology selection, and the existence of sufficiently many internal labels near the horizon.

axioms (6)
  • domain assumption The gravitational path integral provides statistical moments (averages) of state overlaps rather than exact values.
    Central to the whole approach, adopted from [3-7]; without it, RijRji cannot be interpreted as variance.
  • domain assumption The fixed-area prescription of Marolf [32] with an unknown measure factor that is assumed subleading.
    Section 4.1, after Eq (4.21). If the measure factor contributes at leading order, the exponent would change.
  • standard math The Louko-Sorkin crotch geometry contributes a term exp(-(n-1)A/(4G)) to the path integral.
    Eq (4.18), derived from analytic continuation of Gauss-Bonnet; used for all wormhole amplitudes.
  • domain assumption The Schwinger-Dyson equation solution gives the Gram matrix rank threshold N ~ e^{A/4G}.
    Section 4.3; adopted from AdS literature without derivation in this paper.
  • domain assumption Topologies that do not connect the observer's bra and ket are excluded from the path integral.
    Section 2, using [36-38]. If these topologies contribute, dim H = 1 and the whole counting fails.
  • ad hoc to paper The defect states carry enough internal labels to fill a Hilbert space of dimension e^{A/4G}.
    Section 4.3; the paper argues the effective description integrates over internal degrees of freedom, but this is not proven.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 33087 in / 13691 out tokens · 136092 ms · 2026-08-03T22:33:58.733845+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We explore the microscopic origin of de Sitter entropy using a Lorentzian path-integral approach. We construct a Hilbert space whose states are associated with configurations of thin shells or end-of-the-world branes, with state overlaps defined by the gravitational path integral. By considering states which are indistinguishable to an observer, we find that the variance of microstate overlaps is dominated by Lorentzian wormhole topologies with conical singularities. Evaluating these overlaps, we recover the expected area law for the entropy, relating the dimension of the de Sitter Hilbert space to the area of the cosmological horizon. Extending this analysis to Schwarzschild-de Sitter spacetime, we show that both the cosmological and black hole horizons contribute to the total entropy. Along the way, we present an explicit construction of the shell and brane configurations and examine their compatibility with relevant consistency conditions, including the null energy condition.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.09624 by Diego Liska, Jan de Boer, Kamran Salehi Vaziri.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Left, a Lorentzian manifold M with boundary Σ where the space ends (Scenario I). Right, two Lorentzian manifolds ML and MR joined along a timelike codimension-one defect Σ (Scenario II). • Branes in dS and SdS: for branes outside the cosmological horizon of the observer, the NEC is violated but AANEC is satisfied if one imposes reflective boundary conditions on the brane. • Shells in dS: solutions require … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Illustration of the two possible configurations for the defect, with the observer located [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Numerical solutions of the equation of motion ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Numerical solutions for the positions of shells of dust ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_4.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Menagerie of Euclidean constructions for 3D holographic cosmologies

    hep-th 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Generalized Euclidean wormhole constructions in 3D gravity produce holographic duals to approximately homogeneous closed baby-universe cosmologies and identify a necessary condition for the cosmological saddle to domi...

  2. Dark energy from string theory: an introductory review

    hep-th 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    String theory imposes constraints on dark energy but permits various construction attempts for de Sitter vacua and single-field exponential quintessence models despite obstructions.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 53 linked inside Pith · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Cosmological Event Horizons, Thermodynamics, and Particle Creation,

    G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, “Cosmological Event Horizons, Thermodynamics, and Particle Creation,”Phys. Rev. D15(1977) 2738–2751

    1977

  2. [2]

    Action Integrals and Partition Functions in Quantum Gravity,

    G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, “Action Integrals and Partition Functions in Quantum Gravity,”Phys. Rev. D15(1977) 2752–2756

    1977

  3. [3]

    Microscopic origin of the entropy of black holes in general relativity,

    V. Balasubramanian, A. Lawrence, J. M. Magan, and M. Sasieta, “Microscopic origin of the entropy of black holes in general relativity,”arXiv:2212.02447 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  4. [4]

    Replica wormholes and the black hole interior,

    G. Penington, S. H. Shenker, D. Stanford, and Z. Yang, “Replica wormholes and the black hole interior,”JHEP03(2022) 205,arXiv:1911.11977 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    Replica Wormholes and the Entropy of Hawking Radiation,

    A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian, and A. Tajdini, “Replica Wormholes and the Entropy of Hawking Radiation,”JHEP05(2020) 013, arXiv:1911.12333 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  6. [6]

    Microscopic origin of the entropy of astrophysical black holes,

    V. Balasubramanian, A. Lawrence, J. M. Magan, and M. Sasieta, “Microscopic origin of the entropy of astrophysical black holes,”arXiv:2212.08623 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  7. [7]

    How to Count States in Gravity,

    V. Balasubramanian and T. Yildirim, “How to Count States in Gravity,” arXiv:2506.15767 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  8. [8]

    Wave Function of the Universe,

    J. B. Hartle and S. W. Hawking, “Wave Function of the Universe,”Phys. Rev. D28(1983) 2960–2975

    1983

  9. [9]

    JT gravity as a matrix integral,

    P. Saad, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford, “JT gravity as a matrix integral,” arXiv:1903.11115 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1903

  10. [10]

    Random statistics of OPE coefficients and Euclidean wormholes,

    A. Belin and J. de Boer, “Random statistics of OPE coefficients and Euclidean wormholes,” Class. Quant. Grav.38no. 16, (2021) 164001,arXiv:2006.05499 [hep-th]. 47

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  11. [11]

    AdS 3/RMT2 Duality,

    G. Di Ubaldo and E. Perlmutter, “AdS 3/RMT2 Duality,”arXiv:2307.03707 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  12. [12]

    Modular-Invariant Random Matrix Theory and AdS3 Wormholes,

    J. Boruch, G. Di Ubaldo, F. M. Haehl, E. Perlmutter, and M. Rozali, “Modular-Invariant Random Matrix Theory and AdS3 Wormholes,”Phys. Rev. Lett.135no. 12, (2025) 121602, arXiv:2503.00101 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    Late time physics of holographic quantum chaos,

    A. Altland and J. Sonner, “Late time physics of holographic quantum chaos,”SciPost Phys. 11(2021) 034,arXiv:2008.02271 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  14. [14]

    Quantum chaos in 2D gravity,

    A. Altland, B. Post, J. Sonner, J. van der Heijden, and E. Verlinde, “Quantum chaos in 2D gravity,”arXiv:2204.07583 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  15. [15]

    A principle of maximum ignorance for semiclassical gravity,

    J. de Boer, D. Liska, B. Post, and M. Sasieta, “A principle of maximum ignorance for semiclassical gravity,”arXiv:2311.08132 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  16. [16]

    A microscopic realization of dS 3,

    S. Collier, L. Eberhardt, and B. M¨ uhlmann, “A microscopic realization of dS 3,”SciPost Phys.18no. 4, (2025) 131,arXiv:2501.01486 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Semiclassical 3D gravity as an average of large-c CFTs,

    J. Chandra, S. Collier, T. Hartman, and A. Maloney, “Semiclassical 3D gravity as an average of large-c CFTs,”JHEP12(2022) 069,arXiv:2203.06511 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  18. [18]

    Solving 3d Gravity with Virasoro TQFT,

    S. Collier, L. Eberhardt, and M. Zhang, “Solving 3d Gravity with Virasoro TQFT,” arXiv:2304.13650 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  19. [19]

    Surgery and statistics in 3d gravity,

    J. de Boer, J. Kames-King, and B. Post, “Surgery and statistics in 3d gravity,” arXiv:2506.04151 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  20. [20]

    Wormholes from Averaging over States,

    B. Freivogel, D. Nikolakopoulou, and A. F. Rotundo, “Wormholes from Averaging over States,”arXiv:2105.12771 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  21. [21]

    Wormholes from heavy operator statistics in AdS/CFT,

    M. Sasieta, “Wormholes from heavy operator statistics in AdS/CFT,”JHEP03(2023) 158, arXiv:2211.11794 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    Double-scaled SYK and de Sitter holography,

    V. Narovlansky and H. Verlinde, “Double-scaled SYK and de Sitter holography,”JHEP05 (2025) 032,arXiv:2310.16994 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    A violation of global symmetries from replica wormholes and the fate of black hole remnants,

    P.-S. Hsin, L. V. Iliesiu, and Z. Yang, “A violation of global symmetries from replica wormholes and the fate of black hole remnants,”Class. Quant. Grav.38no. 19, (2021) 194004,arXiv:2011.09444 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  24. [24]

    Coarse graining pure states in AdS/CFT,

    J. Chandra and T. Hartman, “Coarse graining pure states in AdS/CFT,” arXiv:2206.03414 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  25. [25]

    Topology in general relativity,

    R. P. Geroch, “Topology in general relativity,”J. Math. Phys.8(1967) 782–786

    1967

  26. [26]

    R. P. Geroch and G. T. Horowitz,Global structure of spacetimes, pp. 212–293. 1979

    1979

  27. [27]

    The Chronology protection conjecture,

    S. W. Hawking, “The Chronology protection conjecture,”Phys. Rev. D46(1992) 603–611

    1992

  28. [28]

    Forks in the road, on the way to quantum gravity,

    R. D. Sorkin, “Forks in the road, on the way to quantum gravity,”Int. J. Theor. Phys.36 (1997) 2759–2781,arXiv:gr-qc/9706002. 48

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  29. [29]

    Path Integrals and the Indefiniteness of the Gravitational Action,

    G. W. Gibbons, S. W. Hawking, and M. J. Perry, “Path Integrals and the Indefiniteness of the Gravitational Action,”Nucl. Phys. B138(1978) 141–150

    1978

  30. [30]

    Complex actions in two-dimensional topology change,

    J. Louko and R. D. Sorkin, “Complex actions in two-dimensional topology change,”Class. Quant. Grav.14(1997) 179–204,arXiv:gr-qc/9511023

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  31. [31]

    The power of Lorentzian wormholes,

    A. Blommaert, J. Kruthoff, and S. Yao, “The power of Lorentzian wormholes,”JHEP10 (2023) 005,arXiv:2302.01360 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  32. [32]

    Gravitational thermodynamics without the conformal factor problem: partition functions and Euclidean saddles from Lorentzian path integrals,

    D. Marolf, “Gravitational thermodynamics without the conformal factor problem: partition functions and Euclidean saddles from Lorentzian path integrals,”JHEP07(2022) 108, arXiv:2203.07421 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  33. [33]

    Euclidean and complex geometries from real-time computations of gravitational R´ enyi entropies,

    J. Held, X. Liu, D. Marolf, and Z. Wang, “Euclidean and complex geometries from real-time computations of gravitational R´ enyi entropies,”JHEP02(2025) 136,arXiv:2409.17428 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Real-time gravitational replicas: Formalism and a variational principle,

    S. Colin-Ellerin, X. Dong, D. Marolf, M. Rangamani, and Z. Wang, “Real-time gravitational replicas: Formalism and a variational principle,”JHEP05(2021) 117,arXiv:2012.00828 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  35. [35]

    Real-time gravitational replicas: low dimensional examples,

    S. Colin-Ellerin, X. Dong, D. Marolf, M. Rangamani, and Z. Wang, “Real-time gravitational replicas: low dimensional examples,”JHEP08(2021) 171,arXiv:2105.07002 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  36. [36]

    The gravitational path integral from an observer’s point of view,

    A. I. Abdalla, S. Antonini, L. V. Iliesiu, and A. Levine, “The gravitational path integral from an observer’s point of view,”JHEP05(2025) 059,arXiv:2501.02632 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Absolute entropy and the observer’s no-boundary state,

    A. Blommaert, J. Kudler-Flam, and E. Y. Urbach, “Absolute entropy and the observer’s no-boundary state,”arXiv:2505.14771 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  38. [38]

    Quantum mechanics and observers for gravity in a closed universe,

    D. Harlow, M. Usatyuk, and Y. Zhao, “Quantum mechanics and observers for gravity in a closed universe,”arXiv:2501.02359 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  39. [39]

    A background-independent algebra in quantum gravity,

    E. Witten, “A background-independent algebra in quantum gravity,”JHEP03(2024) 077, arXiv:2308.03663 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    An algebra of observables for de Sitter space,

    V. Chandrasekaran, R. Longo, G. Penington, and E. Witten, “An algebra of observables for de Sitter space,”JHEP02(2023) 082,arXiv:2206.10780 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  41. [41]

    De Sitter Space and Entanglement,

    C. Arias, F. Diaz, and P. Sundell, “De Sitter Space and Entanglement,”Class. Quant. Grav. 37no. 1, (2020) 015009,arXiv:1901.04554 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  42. [42]

    Quantization of four form fluxes and dynamical neutralization of the cosmological constant,

    R. Bousso and J. Polchinski, “Quantization of four form fluxes and dynamical neutralization of the cosmological constant,”JHEP06(2000) 006,arXiv:hep-th/0004134

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  43. [43]

    Gravitational Effects on and of Vacuum Decay,

    S. R. Coleman and F. De Luccia, “Gravitational Effects on and of Vacuum Decay,”Phys. Rev. D21(1980) 3305

    1980

  44. [44]

    Achronal averaged null energy condition,

    N. Graham and K. D. Olum, “Achronal averaged null energy condition,”Phys. Rev. D76 (2007) 064001,arXiv:0705.3193 [gr-qc]. 49

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  45. [45]

    A class of non-equilibrium states and the black hole interior,

    K. Papadodimas, “A class of non-equilibrium states and the black hole interior,” arXiv:1708.06328 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  46. [46]

    Universal construction of black hole microstates,

    A. Climent, R. Emparan, J. M. Magan, M. Sasieta, and A. Vilar L´ opez, “Universal construction of black hole microstates,”Phys. Rev. D109no. 8, (2024) 086024, arXiv:2401.08775 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    Counting microstates of out-of-equilibrium black hole fluctuations,

    V. Balasubramanian, B. Craps, J. Hernandez, M. Khramtsov, and M. Knysh, “Counting microstates of out-of-equilibrium black hole fluctuations,”JHEP06(2025) 083, arXiv:2412.06884 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    Averaged Null Energy Condition from Causality,

    T. Hartman, S. Kundu, and A. Tajdini, “Averaged Null Energy Condition from Causality,” JHEP07(2017) 066,arXiv:1610.05308 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  49. [49]

    Holographic proof of the averaged null energy condition,

    W. R. Kelly and A. C. Wall, “Holographic proof of the averaged null energy condition,”Phys. Rev. D90no. 10, (2014) 106003,arXiv:1408.3566 [gr-qc]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 91, 069902 (2015)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  50. [50]

    Role of conformal three geometry in the dynamics of gravitation,

    J. W. York, Jr., “Role of conformal three geometry in the dynamics of gravitation,”Phys. Rev. Lett.28(1972) 1082–1085

    1972

  51. [51]

    Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in general relativity,

    W. Israel, “Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in general relativity,”Nuovo Cim. B 44S10(1966) 1. [Erratum: Nuovo Cim.B 48, 463 (1967)]

    1966

  52. [52]

    Fl¨ achenhafte Verteilung der Materie in der Einsteinschen Gravitationstheorie,

    K. Lanczos, “Fl¨ achenhafte Verteilung der Materie in der Einsteinschen Gravitationstheorie,” Annalen Phys.379no. 14, (1924) 518–540

    1924

  53. [53]

    Theorems on gravitational time delay and related issues,

    S. Gao and R. M. Wald, “Theorems on gravitational time delay and related issues,”Class. Quant. Grav.17(2000) 4999–5008,arXiv:gr-qc/0007021

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  54. [54]

    A Note On Complex Spacetime Metrics,

    E. Witten, “A Note On Complex Spacetime Metrics,”arXiv:2111.06514 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  55. [55]

    Wick Rotation and the Positivity of Energy in Quantum Field Theory,

    M. Kontsevich and G. Segal, “Wick Rotation and the Positivity of Energy in Quantum Field Theory,”Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser.72no. 1-2, (2021) 673–699,arXiv:2105.10161 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  56. [56]

    Microscopic origin of the entropy of single-sided black holes,

    H. Geng and Y. Jiang, “Microscopic origin of the entropy of single-sided black holes,”JHEP 04(2025) 133,arXiv:2409.12219 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    Holography for de Sitter bubble geometries,

    A. Irakleous, F. Rondeau, and N. Toumbas, “Holography for de Sitter bubble geometries,” arXiv:2509.19423 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  58. [58]

    Inflation in AdS/CFT,

    B. Freivogel, V. E. Hubeny, A. Maloney, R. C. Myers, M. Rangamani, and S. Shenker, “Inflation in AdS/CFT,”JHEP03(2006) 007,arXiv:hep-th/0510046

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  59. [59]

    Punctuated eternal inflation via AdS/CFT,

    D. A. Lowe and S. Roy, “Punctuated eternal inflation via AdS/CFT,”Phys. Rev. D82 (2010) 063508,arXiv:1004.1402 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  60. [60]

    De Sitter horizons & holographic liquids,

    D. Anninos, D. A. Galante, and D. M. Hofman, “De Sitter horizons & holographic liquids,” JHEP07(2019) 038,arXiv:1811.08153 [hep-th]. 50

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  61. [61]

    Flow-geometry microstates,

    R. Esp ´ ındola and S. Miyashita, “Flow-geometry microstates,”arXiv:2510.18901 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  62. [62]

    De Sitter Bra-Ket wormholes,

    A. Fumagalli, V. Gorbenko, and J. Kames-King, “De Sitter Bra-Ket wormholes,”JHEP05 (2025) 074,arXiv:2408.08351 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    Bra-ket wormholes in gravitationally prepared states,

    Y. Chen, V. Gorbenko, and J. Maldacena, “Bra-ket wormholes in gravitationally prepared states,”JHEP02(2021) 009,arXiv:2007.16091 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  64. [64]

    The spectrum of pure dS 3 gravity in the static patch,

    J. Chakravarty, A. Maloney, K. Namjou, and S. F. Ross, “The spectrum of pure dS 3 gravity in the static patch,”JHEP10(2025) 021,arXiv:2505.06420 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  65. [65]

    Infinite irreducible representations of the lorentz group,

    Harish-Chandra, “Infinite irreducible representations of the lorentz group,”Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences189no. 1018, (1947) 372–401

    1947

  66. [66]

    Irreducible unitary representations of the lorentz group,

    V. Bargmann, “Irreducible unitary representations of the lorentz group,”Annals of Mathematics48no. 3, (1947) 568–640

    1947

  67. [67]

    Unitary representations of the Lorentz group,

    M. A. N. I. M. Gel’fand, “ Unitary representations of the Lorentz group,”Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat11(1947) 411–504

    1947

  68. [68]

    On unitary representations of the group of de sitter space,

    L. H. Thomas, “On unitary representations of the group of de sitter space,”Annals of Mathematics42no. 1, (1941) 113–126

    1941

  69. [69]

    A note on the representations of SO(1,d + 1),

    Z. Sun, “A note on the representations of SO(1,d + 1),”Rev. Math. Phys.37no. 01, (2025) 2430007,arXiv:2111.04591 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  70. [70]

    Hilbert space of quantum field theory in de Sitter spacetime,

    J. Penedones, K. Salehi Vaziri, and Z. Sun, “Hilbert space of quantum field theory in de Sitter spacetime,”Phys. Rev. D111no. 4, (2025) 045001,arXiv:2301.04146 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  71. [71]

    An invitation to the principal series,

    T. Anous and J. Skulte, “An invitation to the principal series,”SciPost Phys.9no. 3, (2020) 028,arXiv:2007.04975 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  72. [72]

    On the Euclidean action of de Sitter black holes and constrained instantons,

    E. K. Morvan, J. P. van der Schaar, and M. R. Visser, “On the Euclidean action of de Sitter black holes and constrained instantons,”SciPost Phys.14no. 2, (2023) 022, arXiv:2203.06155 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  73. [73]

    Microscopic origin of the entropy of de Sitter spacetime,

    Z. Wang, “Microscopic origin of the entropy of de Sitter spacetime,”arXiv:2506.03058 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  74. [74]

    Poisson,A Relativist’s Toolkit: The Mathematics of Black-Hole Mechanics

    E. Poisson,A Relativist’s Toolkit: The Mathematics of Black-Hole Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, 12, 2009

    2009

  75. [75]

    Visser,Lorentzian wormholes: From Einstein to Hawking

    M. Visser,Lorentzian wormholes: From Einstein to Hawking. 1995

    1995

  76. [76]

    S. S. Bavera,The Boundary Terms of the Einstein-Hilbert Action. Zurich, Switzerland, March, 2018. 51

    2018