Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 4 cited by

Gravitational radiation in curved spacetimes may be read off entirely from the dissipative behavior of a dual boundary fluid.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 06:13 UTC pith:2NOEA7P6

load-bearing objection Proceedings summary of a stronger companion paper, with a load-bearing flat-limit claim that looks internally inconsistent: Eq. (29) diverges as κ→0 while Eq. (16) calls the same quantity finite. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2602.00396 v2 pith:2NOEA7P6 submitted 2026-01-30 hep-th gr-qc

Nonperfect Carrollian Fluids Through Holography

Felipe Diaz This is my paper
classification hep-th gr-qc
keywords gravitational radiationAdS/CFT correspondencefluid/gravity dualityCarrollian fluidsBel-Robinson tensorCotton-York tensorholographic stress tensoralgebraically special spacetimes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper aims to show that gravitational radiation in four-dimensional anti-de Sitter spacetimes is encoded in the dissipative dynamics of the dual boundary fluid. It imports a recently proposed covariant radiation criterion, based on the Bel-Robinson tensor, into the fluid/gravity dictionary and derives that a spacetime radiates precisely when the boundary Cotton and holographic stress tensors fail to align and a certain radiative vector fails to vanish. In algebraically special spacetimes, that radiative vector is a combination of heat flux and viscous stress, so radiation is tied to non-perfect fluid behavior. A smooth flat limit of the same vector yields Carroll-covariant radiative tensors, offering a new description of gravitational radiation at null infinity. The framework is demonstrated on a canonical family of algebraically special solutions, where time-dependence generates radiation while the first-order entropy current remains conserved.

Core claim

The central claim is that, for vacuum spacetimes with an algebraically special Weyl tensor, bulk gravitational radiation reaching the boundary is essentially the dissipative part of the dual fluid's dynamics. Specifically, the radiative vector obtained from the Bel-Robinson tensor's boundary flux is proportional to a combination of the heat current and viscous stress tensor (Eq. 9) and vanishes only for perfect fluids. In the flat-space limit, this produces two Carroll-covariant quantities — a radiative scalar and a radiative vector — built from the Carrollian viscous stress and heat flux (Eq. 16), which are suggested to correspond to the news tensor at null infinity. An entropy-production f

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the radiative vector: a boundary projection of the Bel-Robinson tensor (a gravitational analogue of the electromagnetic Poynting flux, constructed from the Weyl tensor), whose vanishing, together with a Cotton-stress alignment condition, defines non-radiative spacetimes. Under the fluid/gravity dictionary, this vector evaluates to a combination of the boundary heat current and viscous stress tensor, which is why radiation is tied to non-perfect fluids. The flat limit is taken using a boundary-metric parametrization that becomes degenerate in the limit, producing the Carroll-covariant radiative scalar and vector.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a recent covariant criterion — radiation in AdS is absent exactly when the boundary Cotton and stress tensors align and a Bel-Robinson-derived radiative vector vanishes — correctly characterizes gravitational radiation, together with the assertion that the flat limit of this vector stays finite despite apparent κ^{-2} terms.

What would settle it

Find an algebraically special AlAdS spacetime whose boundary fluid is perfect (or whose radiative vector vanishes) and yet an independent, accepted method — such as a news tensor constructed at the boundary or a characteristic initial-value calculation — detects gravitational radiation; that would falsify the dictionary. Alternatively, compute the flat limit of the entropy flux law (14) and check whether the Carroll radiative scalar and vector remain finite; if the κ^{-2} terms from the explicit Robinson-Trautman components (29) cannot be cancelled, the flat-limit Carroll pair is an artifact.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If correct, every gravitational wave in the bulk corresponds to a non-trivial heat current or viscous stress in the boundary fluid; perfect fluids can never radiate.
  • The entropy-production law provides a concrete holographic measure: the divergence of the first-order entropy current equals the radiative vector plus subleading Weyl data, so bulk radiation can be probed through boundary entropy generation.
  • The flat-limit Carroll radiative pair is suggested to be the news tensor and its divergence at null infinity, giving a Carroll-covariant formulation of gravitational radiation in asymptotically flat spacetimes.
  • In the worked example, radiation occurs only for time-dependent configurations with non-perfect dual fluids; time-independent solutions do not radiate, matching expectations for stationary sources.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the suggested identification with the news tensor holds, measuring the Carrollian viscous stress and heat flux at null infinity would provide a gauge-invariant surrogate for the news tensor, potentially simplifying gravitational-wave detection in asymptotically flat settings.
  • The conservation of the first-order entropy current despite ongoing radiation suggests the radiative process is reversible to leading order; computing the flat limit of the entropy flux law may reveal higher-order Carrollian dissipative corrections and a genuinely non-conserved entropy.
  • The dependence of radiation on non-perfect fluid data suggests a classification scheme: any algebraically special AlAdS spacetime whose boundary fluid is perfect should be non-radiative; scanning known exact solutions against this criterion could test the dictionary beyond the worked example.
  • Since the radiation definition itself is assumed from a recent criterion, an independent derivation or a numerical check of that criterion on known radiative AdS spacetimes would be needed to confirm the entire chain of claims.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper embeds the Fernández-Álvarez–Senovilla (FS) criterion for gravitational radiation in asymptotically locally anti-de Sitter spacetimes into the fluid-gravity dictionary. It claims that bulk radiation is encoded in boundary dissipative data: the FS radiative vector (Eq. 6) is rewritten in fluid variables (Eq. 9), an entropy-production flux law is proposed (Eq. 14), and a flat κ→0 limit is taken to produce a Carroll radiative scalar and vector (Eq. 16). The Robinson–Trautman family is used as an explicit example, with Carroll data given in Eqs. (33)–(36) and the Carroll radiative pair in Eqs. (37)–(38). The paper is a proceedings-style summary; essentially all derivations are deferred to Ref. [63], a companion paper that includes the present author.

Significance. If the central construction were correct, it would forge a genuinely new bridge between bulk gravitational radiation, boundary dissipative hydrodynamics, and Carrollian holography. The absence of any fitting parameters, the analytic character of the relations, and the explicit Robinson–Trautman example are strengths. However, the main advertised result—the finite Carroll radiative pair in Eq. (16)—is contradicted by the paper's own explicit component (29), which contains an uncontrolled κ^{-2} divergence. Since the Carrollian half of the paper is the title's central claim, this is not a presentation issue but a load-bearing technical flaw. The quantum-gravity and higher-spin comments in the conclusions are reasonable outlooks but do not affect the assessment.

major comments (3)
  1. [Carrollian limits, Eq. (16) and Eq. (29)] The flat-limit claim is not supported by the paper's own equations. For the Robinson–Trautman boundary data, Ω=1 and b_A=0, so Eq. (29) gives P̂_u = e^{-2Φ}[κ^{-2}(∂̄Φ∂̄Φ̇−∂̄²Φ̇)(∂Φ∂Φ̇−∂²Φ̇) − (∂̄ΦΔΦ−Δ∂̄Φ)(∂ΦΔΦ−Δ∂Φ)]. The second term is κ-independent, and nothing in the RT equation (20) forces the κ^{-2} coefficient to vanish for generic time-dependent data; linearized spherical-harmonic modes with Φ̇≠0 provide an immediate counterexample. Hence lim_{κ→0}(1/Ω)P̂_u diverges. Moreover, Eq. (37) is, up to an overall sign, exactly the coefficient of κ^{-2} in Eq. (29), not a finite remainder. The assertion in Eq. (16) that a finite contribution emerges therefore requires an explicit subtraction or renormalization prescription, which is neither stated nor justified. Because the Carroll radiative pair is the advertised new result, this is an internal inconsistency, not a matter of convention.
  2. [Entropy Production; Introduction] All of the central equations (9), (14), (16), and the Robinson–Trautman boundary data (24)–(31) are quoted without derivation and attributed to Ref. [63], a companion paper with overlapping authorship. In a proceedings contribution some deferral is natural, but here the omitted steps are precisely where the claimed finiteness of the κ→0 limit would have to be exhibited. As written, the entropy-production criterion (14) and the reduction leading to (16) are not checkable from the manuscript. The authors should either reproduce the essential steps or clearly state which equations are conjectural summaries of [63] and which are established here.
  3. [Eq. (18) and Conclusions] The identification Σ_{AB} ∼ Ṅ_{AB}, Q_A ∼ D^B N_{AB} with the Bondi news tensor is presented as a suggestion, not a derivation. Given that Eq. (16) is already problematic, this map is currently unsupported. If the flat-limit issue is repaired, the authors should either prove this correspondence or explicitly label it as a conjecture with a concrete consistency check against known Bondi news expressions for the Robinson–Trautman family.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Introduction] Typo: “I˙nönü-Wigner” should be “İnönü-Wigner.”
  2. [Carrollian limits] “á la Papapetrou-Randers” should be “à la Papapetrou-Randers.”
  3. [Conclusions] The phrase “isoentropic Moutier’s cycle” is unexplained; a definition or citation is needed.
  4. [Eq. (28)] The second diagonal entry of τ^{ij}, written as ∂Φ∂̄Φ−∂²Φ̇, appears to mix terms of different derivative orders. Please check the displayed formula and the surrounding index conventions.
  5. [Carrollian limits, Eq. (16) and text before Eq. (17)] The statement that “the nonrelativistic limit ... gives rise to two nontrivial Carroll-covariant finite contributions” is in direct tension with Eq. (29). At minimum, the wording should be changed to describe the subtraction or limiting procedure actually used.
  6. [Footnotes and references] Footnote 77 defines the Hodge dual on Carroll vectors only after it is used in the main text; consider moving the definition earlier.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

The central radiation/dissipation dictionary is inherited from the authors' own Ref. [63] via load-bearing self-citation; no fitting-based circularity is present, but the flat-limit claim has a separate consistency problem.

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Introduction, Eqs. (9), (10), (14); Ref. [63]]
    "This contribution is a proceedings article based on the results presented in Ref. [63], where the detailed derivations were originally carried out. ... Using this expansion, the radiative vector for algebraically special Petrov-type spacetimes becomes [63] ... written in terms of fluid variables, gives the entropy production criterion [63]."

    The paper's central 'predictions'—the radiative vector in fluid variables (9), the flux law (10), and the entropy-production criterion (14)—are not derived in this text; each is asserted with a pointer to Ref. [63], and the paper states that the detailed derivations were carried out there. Ref. [63] is the authors' own prior collaboration (acknowledgments: 'results reported in this paper have been obtained in collaboration with G. Arenas-Henriquez, L. Ciambelli, F. Diaz, W. Jia, and D. Rivera-Betancour'). Thus the load-bearing derivation chain terminates in a same-author citation rather than in first-principles computation in this paper. This is transparent for a proceedings article, but it means the text itself does not independently establish the claimed correspondence.

full rationale

There is no fitting anywhere: all displayed relations are analytic and no parameter is tuned to data. The FS radiation criterion is an external, explicitly cited assumption (Refs. 56-59), so relying on it is an assumption, not a circularity. The Robinson-Trautman section contains self-contained explicit formulas, giving the central claim some independent content. The main circularity concern is that the general dictionary, Eqs. (9), (10), and (14), is merely imported from the authors' own Ref. [63]; the paper itself says the detailed derivations were carried out there. Separately, but not as circularity, the claimed finiteness of the flat limit (16) is not justified: the explicit RT component (29) contains an uncontrolled κ^{-2} term, and Eq. (37) matches the negative of that κ^{-2} coefficient rather than a genuine κ→0 limit, so the limit is divergent for generic RT data. Also, the statement that the RT non-radiative sector corresponds to a trivial radiative vector conflicts with the paper's own earlier warning (citing [59]) that P̂_i=0 alone is insufficient for non-radiation. These are correctness/omitted-proof concerns, not circularity, and are noted for completeness. Because the central derivation is load-bearing self-citation but retains independent example content, the circularity score is 4.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 6 axioms · 2 invented entities

No parameters are fitted to data anywhere in the paper; all relations are analytic. The RT mass parameter m and the dynamical field Φ(u,ζ,ζ̄) are inherited from the Robinson-Trautman solution space and governed by the RT equation (20), not introduced to force the results. The flat-limit coefficients (-128π²G², -256π²G²) in (16) follow from the analytic limit and are not hand-adjusted. The load-bearing inputs are the FS radiation criterion (a 2025 proposal), the standard holographic dictionary, the algebraically-special restriction on (9), and the existence/finiteness of the Carrollian κ→0 limit — all domain assumptions imported from prior work ([56-59], [62], [33,69]).

free parameters (1)
  • m (Robinson-Trautman mass parameter) = constant (Bondi-time independent, per footnote 75)
    Standard integration constant of the RT family, not fitted to data; the boundary radiative vector and entropy statements in the RT section carry explicit m dependence (e.g., Eqs 30-31). It is inherited from the solution space, not introduced ad hoc.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption FS radiation criterion for AlAdS4: no radiation iff P̂(^n)=0 with P̂_µ = -Ω²D̂_µ^{αβγ}v̂_αv̂_βv̂_γ, equivalent to αC_{ij}=βT_{ij} and a vanishing radiative vector (Eqs 2-6)
    Imported from [56-59]; Ref [59] is from 2025. The entire holographic radiation dictionary rests on this recent criterion, and the paper itself notes the difficulty of defining AdS radiation (intro, [48-55]).
  • domain assumption Standard fluid-gravity dictionary: Dirichlet BCs, holographic stress tensor via Fefferman-Graham, boundary Cotton tensor as holographic data, electric/magnetic Weyl expansion (12)-(13)
    From [62,66,70]; used to convert the FS boundary flux into Eqs (5)-(6) and the fluid decomposition (7)-(8).
  • domain assumption Algebraically special restriction: Eq (9) for the radiative vector in fluid variables is valid only for algebraically special Petrov types
    'for algebraically special Petrov-type spacetimes' (before Eq 9). The general Petrov case is not given; RT is Petrov D/II, so the example is covered.
  • domain assumption The strong Carroll structure plus Papapetrou-Randers parametrization yields a well-defined, finite κ→0 limit of the holographic radiative vector (Eqs 15-16)
    Limit prescription from [33,69]; finiteness is asserted, not shown (Eq 29 contains κ^{-2} terms).
  • standard math Robinson-Trautman line element (19) solves Einstein equations iff Φ satisfies ΔΔΦ + 3mΦ̇ = 0 (RT/Calabi flow)
    Known exact-solution fact [75,76]; used for the example's boundary data and radiative vector.
  • domain assumption Bel-Robinson tensor conservation and boundary decay properties; P̂ covariantly conserved on shell at the boundary
    From [56-61,111]; needed for the flux law (10) and the entropy-production rewrite (14).
invented entities (2)
  • Carroll radiative scalar ρ̂ and Carroll radiative vector ϒ̂_A (Eq 16) no independent evidence
    purpose: Claimed Carroll-covariant boundary observables that detect bulk gravitational radiation in the flat limit; conjecturally related to Bondi news via (18)
    Defined as limits of previously known quantities (6); composite objects, not new fundamental entities. Their only external handle is the 'suggested' Bondi-news identification (18), which is not derived, so independent falsifiability is not established.
  • Boundary entropy-production criterion (Eq 14) with 'isoentropic Moutier's cycle' interpretation no independent evidence
    purpose: Ledger connecting bulk radiation flux F̂^r_(1) to the boundary entropy current divergence
    The RT example gives ∇·s=0 (32), so the 'entropy production' reading is not tied to a demonstrated thermodynamic increase; the paper defers discussion to [68].

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 12 in / 31592 out tokens · 347208 ms · 2026-08-03T06:13:27.449317+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We embed the covariant, gauge-invariant gravitational radiation criteria of Fern\'andez-\'Alvarez and Senovilla, based in terms of conformal geometry and the Bel-Robinson tensor, into the hydrodynamic framework of gauge/gravity duality. This construction uncovers a direct correspondence between bulk gravitational waves and dissipative processes in the boundary theory, from which a natural notion of entropy production emerges. We further analyze a smooth flat limit in which the dual fluid becomes Carrollian, with dissipation governed by Carroll-covariant tensors. As an example, we apply our framework to the Robinson-Trautman family of solutions.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Carrollian limit of NS-NS and Heterotic Supergravity

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    Ultra-relativistic expansion plus dilaton scaling produces finite covariant Carrollian NS-NS and heterotic supergravity actions, with trivializable Green-Schwarz for the 1-form and finite leading Riem^{2} α' corrections.

  2. Carrollian limit of NS-NS and Heterotic Supergravity

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    A finite Carrollian limit of NS-NS and heterotic supergravity is constructed by field expansion, including a gauge sector, a Green-Schwarz mechanism analysis, and a finite leading α' correction.

  3. Quasinormal Modes of pp-Wave Spacetimes and Zero Temperature Dissipation

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Scalar quasinormal modes on pp-wave spacetimes show zero-temperature dissipation for d >= 3 via an irregular singular point acting as absorber, with exact non-dissipative spectrum for d=2 and gapped modes proven by re...

  4. Gravitational Memory Beyond Null Infinity through Finite-Distance Carrollian Screens

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Finite-distance null screens carry a Carrollian memory whose leading tracefree large-radius part reproduces the standard Bondi displacement memory in Robinson–Trautman spacetimes.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

113 extracted references · 88 linked inside Pith · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Covariant theory of asymptotic symmetries, conservation laws and central charges,

    G. Barnich and F. Brandt, “Covariant theory of asymptotic symmetries, conservation laws and central charges,” Nucl. Phys. B633, 3–82 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0111246

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  2. [2]

    Surface charge algebra in gauge theories and thermodynamic integrability,

    G. Barnich and G. Compere, “Surface charge algebra in gauge theories and thermodynamic integrability,” J. Math. Phys.49, 042901 (2008), arXiv:0708.2378 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  3. [3]

    Central Charges in the Canonical Realization of Asymptotic Symmetries: An Example from Three- Dimensional Gravity,

    J. D. Brown and M. Henneaux, “Central Charges in the Canonical Realization of Asymptotic Symmetries: An Example from Three- Dimensional Gravity,” Commun. Math. Phys.104, 207–226 (1986)

    1986

  4. [4]

    The Black hole in three-dimensional space-time,

    M. Banados, C. Teitelboim, and J. Zanelli, “The Black hole in three-dimensional space-time,” Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 1849–1851 (1992), arXiv:hep-th/9204099

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  5. [5]

    Black hole entropy from near horizon microstates,

    A. Strominger, “Black hole entropy from near horizon microstates,” JHEP02, 009 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9712251

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  6. [6]

    The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,

    J. M. Maldacena, “The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2, 231–252 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9711200

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  7. [7]

    Anti de Sitter space and holography,

    E. Witten, “Anti de Sitter space and holography,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2, 253–291 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9802150

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  8. [8]

    Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. M. Polyakov, “Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,” Phys. Lett. B428, 105–114 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9802109

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  9. [9]

    Gravitational waves in general relativity. 7. Waves from axisymmetric isolated systems,

    H. Bondi, M. G. J. van der Burg, and A. W. K. Metzner, “Gravitational waves in general relativity. 7. Waves from axisymmetric isolated systems,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A269, 21–52 (1962)

    1962

  10. [10]

    Gravitational waves in general relativity. 6. The outgoing radiation condition,

    R. K. Sachs, “Gravitational waves in general relativity. 6. The outgoing radiation condition,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A264, 309–338 (1961)

    1961

  11. [11]

    Radiative gravitational fields in general relativity I. general structure of the field outside the source,

    L. Blanchet and T. Damour, “Radiative gravitational fields in general relativity I. general structure of the field outside the source,” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A320, 379–430 (1986)

    1986

  12. [12]

    Strominger,Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory(Princeton University Press, 2018) arXiv:1703.05448 [hep- th]

    A. Strominger,Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory(Princeton University Press, 2018) arXiv:1703.05448 [hep- th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  13. [13]

    The Flat limit of three dimensional asymptotically anti-de Sitter spacetimes,

    G. Barnich, A. Gomberoff, and H. A. Gonzalez, “The Flat limit of three dimensional asymptotically anti-de Sitter spacetimes,” Phys. Rev. D 86, 024020 (2012), arXiv:1204.3288 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  14. [14]

    Aspects of the BMS/CFT correspondence,

    G. Barnich and C. Troessaert, “Aspects of the BMS/CFT correspondence,” JHEP05, 062 (2010), arXiv:1001.1541 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  15. [15]

    BMS charge algebra,

    G. Barnich and C. Troessaert, “BMS charge algebra,” JHEP12, 105 (2011), arXiv:1106.0213 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  16. [16]

    Conformal invariants,

    Fefferman, Charles and Graham, C. Robin, “Conformal invariants,” inÉlie Cartan et les mathématiques d’aujourd’hui - Lyon, 25-29 juin 1984, Astérisque No. S131 (Société mathématique de France, 1985)

    1984

  17. [17]

    Foundations of Carrollian Geometry,

    L. Ciambelli and P. Jai-akson, “Foundations of Carrollian Geometry,” (2025), arXiv:2510.21651 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Une nouvelle limite non-relativiste du groupe de Poincaré,

    J.-M. Lévy-Leblond, “Une nouvelle limite non-relativiste du groupe de Poincaré,” Ann. Inst. H. Poincare Phys. Theor. A3, 1–12 (1965)

    1965

  19. [19]

    On an analogue of the Galilei group,

    N. D. Sen Gupta, “On an analogue of the Galilei group,” Nuovo Cim. A44, 512–517 (1966)

    1966

  20. [20]

    Conformal Carroll groups and BMS symmetry,

    C. Duval, G. W. Gibbons, and P. A. Horvathy, “Conformal Carroll groups and BMS symmetry,” Class. Quant. Grav.31, 092001 (2014), arXiv:1402.5894 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  21. [21]

    Galilean Conformal Algebras and AdS/CFT,

    A. Bagchi and R. Gopakumar, “Galilean Conformal Algebras and AdS/CFT,” JHEP07, 037 (2009), arXiv:0902.1385 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  22. [22]

    Flat Holography: Aspects of the dual field theory,

    A. Bagchi, R. Basu, A. Kakkar, and A. Mehra, “Flat Holography: Aspects of the dual field theory,” JHEP12, 147 (2016), arXiv:1609.06203 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  23. [23]

    Flat holography and Carrollian fluids,

    L. Ciambelli, C. Marteau, A. C. Petkou, P. M. Petropoulos, and K. Siampos, “Flat holography and Carrollian fluids,” JHEP07, 165 (2018), arXiv:1802.06809 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  24. [24]

    (A)dS 4 in Bondi gauge,

    A. Poole, K. Skenderis, and M. Taylor, “(A)dS 4 in Bondi gauge,” Class. Quant. Grav.36, 095005 (2019), arXiv:1812.05369 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  25. [25]

    Flat space physics from AdS/CFT,

    E. Hijano, “Flat space physics from AdS/CFT,” JHEP07, 132 (2019), arXiv:1905.02729 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  26. [26]

    TheΛ-BMS 4 group of dS4 and new boundary conditions for AdS 4,

    G. Compère, A. Fiorucci, and R. Ruzziconi, “TheΛ-BMS 4 group of dS4 and new boundary conditions for AdS 4,” Class. Quant. Grav.36, 195017 (2019), [Erratum: Class.Quant.Grav. 38, 229501 (2021)], arXiv:1905.00971 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  27. [27]

    TheΛ-BMS 4 charge algebra,

    G. Compère, A. Fiorucci, and R. Ruzziconi, “TheΛ-BMS 4 charge algebra,” JHEP10, 205 (2020), arXiv:2004.10769 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  28. [28]

    Soft photon theorems from CFT Ward identites in the flat limit of AdS/CFT,

    E. Hijano and D. Neuenfeld, “Soft photon theorems from CFT Ward identites in the flat limit of AdS/CFT,” JHEP11, 009 (2020), arXiv:2005.03667 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  29. [29]

    Landau diagrams in AdS and S-matrices from conformal correlators,

    S. Komatsu, M. F. Paulos, B. C. Van Rees, and X. Zhao, “Landau diagrams in AdS and S-matrices from conformal correlators,” JHEP11, 046 (2020), arXiv:2007.13745 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  30. [30]

    Notes on flat-space limit of AdS/CFT,

    Y .-Z. Li, “Notes on flat-space limit of AdS/CFT,” JHEP09, 027 (2021), arXiv:2106.04606 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  31. [31]

    Chiral higher-spin holography in flat space: the Flato-Fronsdal theorem and lower-point functions,

    D. Ponomarev, “Chiral higher-spin holography in flat space: the Flato-Fronsdal theorem and lower-point functions,” JHEP01, 048 (2023), arXiv:2210.04036 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  32. [32]

    Towards an IR finite S-matrix in the flat limit of AdS/CFT,

    S. Duary, E. Hijano, and M. Patra, “Towards an IR finite S-matrix in the flat limit of AdS/CFT,” (2022), arXiv:2211.13711 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  33. [33]

    Flat from anti de Sitter,

    A. Campoleoni, A. Delfante, S. Pekar, P. M. Petropoulos, D. Rivera-Betancour, and M. Vilatte, “Flat from anti de Sitter,” JHEP12, 078 (2023), arXiv:2309.15182 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  34. [34]

    AdS Witten diagrams to Carrollian correlators,

    A. Bagchi, P. Dhivakar, and S. Dutta, “AdS Witten diagrams to Carrollian correlators,” JHEP04, 135 (2023), arXiv:2303.07388 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  35. [35]

    Carrollian Amplitudes from Holographic Correlators,

    L. F. Alday, M. Nocchi, R. Ruzziconi, and A. Yelleshpur Srikant, “Carrollian Amplitudes from Holographic Correlators,” (2024), arXiv:2406.19343 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    Carrollian Partition Functions and the Flat Limit of AdS,

    P. Kraus and R. M. Myers, “Carrollian Partition Functions and the Flat Limit of AdS,” (2024), arXiv:2407.13668 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    Flat-space limit of holographic pseudoentropy in (A)dS spacetimes,

    R. Fareghbal, “Flat-space limit of holographic pseudoentropy in (A)dS spacetimes,” Phys. Rev. D110, 066019 (2024), arXiv:2408.03061 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  38. [38]

    Flat limit of AdS/CFT from AdS geodesics: scattering amplitudes and antipodal matching of Liénard-Wiechert fields,

    S. Duary and S. Upadhyay, “Flat limit of AdS/CFT from AdS geodesics: scattering amplitudes and antipodal matching of Liénard-Wiechert fields,” (2024), arXiv:2411.08540 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    Flat space spinning massive amplitudes from momentum space CFT,

    R. Marotta, K. Skenderis, and M. Verma, “Flat space spinning massive amplitudes from momentum space CFT,” JHEP08, 226 (2024), arXiv:2406.06447 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    Towards a Flat Space Carrollian Hologram from AdS 4/CFT3,

    A. Lipstein, R. Ruzziconi, and A. Yelleshpur Srikant, “Towards a Flat Space Carrollian Hologram from AdS 4/CFT3,” (2025), arXiv:2504.10291 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Carrollian Amplitudes and Holographic Correlators in AdS3/CFT2,

    I. Surubaru and B. Zhu, “Carrollian Amplitudes and Holographic Correlators in AdS3/CFT2,” (2025), arXiv:2504.07650 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    Bulk Reconstruction of Scalar Excitations in Flat 3/CCFT2 and the Flat Limit from (A)dS3/CFT2,

    P.-X. Hao, K. Shinmyo, Y .-k. Suzuki, S. Takahashi, and T. Takayanagi, “Bulk Reconstruction of Scalar Excitations in Flat 3/CCFT2 and the Flat Limit from (A)dS3/CFT2,” (2025), arXiv:2505.20084 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Lectures on Carrollian Holography,

    K. Nguyen, “Lectures on Carrollian Holography,” (2025), arXiv:2511.10162 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    The Carrollian Kaleidoscope,

    A. Bagchi, A. Banerjee, P. Dhivakar, S. Mondal, and A. Shukla, “The Carrollian Kaleidoscope,” (2025), arXiv:2506.16164 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    BMS flux algebra in celestial holography,

    L. Donnay and R. Ruzziconi, “BMS flux algebra in celestial holography,” JHEP11, 040 (2021), arXiv:2108.11969 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  46. [46]

    Carrollian Perspective on Celestial Holography,

    L. Donnay, A. Fiorucci, Y . Herfray, and R. Ruzziconi, “Carrollian Perspective on Celestial Holography,” Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 071602 (2022), arXiv:2202.04702 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  47. [47]

    Bridging Carrollian and celestial holography,

    L. Donnay, A. Fiorucci, Y . Herfray, and R. Ruzziconi, “Bridging Carrollian and celestial holography,” Phys. Rev. D107, 126027 (2023), arXiv:2212.12553 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  48. [48]

    Setting the boundary free in AdS/CFT,

    G. Compere and D. Marolf, “Setting the boundary free in AdS/CFT,” Class. Quant. Grav.25, 195014 (2008), arXiv:0805.1902 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  49. [49]

    Dual Gravitons in AdS(4) / CFT(3) and the Holographic Cotton Tensor,

    S. de Haro, “Dual Gravitons in AdS(4) / CFT(3) and the Holographic Cotton Tensor,” JHEP01, 042 (2009), arXiv:0808.2054 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  50. [50]

    Topological regularization and self-duality in four-dimensional anti-de Sitter gravity,

    O. Miskovic and R. Olea, “Topological regularization and self-duality in four-dimensional anti-de Sitter gravity,” Phys. Rev. D79, 124020 (2009), arXiv:0902.2082 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  51. [51]

    The symplectic potential for leaky boundaries,

    R. McNees and C. Zwikel, “The symplectic potential for leaky boundaries,” JHEP01, 049 (2025), arXiv:2408.13203 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    AdS3 Freelance Holography, A Detailed Analysis,

    M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari and V . Taghiloo, “AdS3 Freelance Holography, A Detailed Analysis,” (2025), arXiv:2510.10692 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    Freelance holography, part I: Setting boundary conditions free in gauge/gravity corre- spondence,

    A. Parvizi, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, and V . Taghiloo, “Freelance holography, part I: Setting boundary conditions free in gauge/gravity corre- spondence,” SciPost Phys.19, 043 (2025), arXiv:2503.09371 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    Freelance holography, part II: Moving boundary in gauge/gravity correspondence,

    A. Parvizi, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, and V . Taghiloo, “Freelance holography, part II: Moving boundary in gauge/gravity correspondence,” SciPost Phys. Core8, 075 (2025), arXiv:2503.09372 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    (Anti)-de Sitter with leaky boundaries and corners,

    R. McNees and C. Zwikel, “(Anti)-de Sitter with leaky boundaries and corners,” (2025), arXiv:2512.03170 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    Novel characterization of gravitational radiation in asymptotically flat spacetimes,

    F. Fernández-Álvarez and J. M. M. Senovilla, “Novel characterization of gravitational radiation in asymptotically flat spacetimes,” Phys. Rev. D101, 024060 (2020), arXiv:1909.13796 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  57. [57]

    Gravitational radiation condition at infinity with a positive cosmological constant,

    F. Fernández-Álvarez and J. M. M. Senovilla, “Gravitational radiation condition at infinity with a positive cosmological constant,” Phys. Rev. D102, 101502 (2020), arXiv:2007.11677 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  58. [58]

    Analysis of gravitational radiation generated by type D black holes with positive cosmological constant,

    F. Fernández-Álvarez, J. Podolský, and J. M. M. Senovilla, “Analysis of gravitational radiation generated by type D black holes with positive cosmological constant,” Phys. Rev. D110, 104029 (2024), arXiv:2407.14863 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  59. [59]

    Gravitational radiation at infinity with negative cosmological constant and AdS4 holography,

    F. Fernández-Álvarez and J. M. M. Senovilla, “Gravitational radiation at infinity with negative cosmological constant and AdS4 holography,” (2025), arXiv:2507.05826 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  60. [60]

    Introduction d’un tenseur du quatriéme ordre,

    L. Bel, “Introduction d’un tenseur du quatriéme ordre,” CR Acad. Sci. Paris248, 1297 (1958)

    1958

  61. [61]

    On the bel - robinson tensor,

    I. Robinson, “On the bel - robinson tensor,” Classical and Quantum Gravity14, A331 (1997)

    1997

  62. [62]

    The fluid/gravity correspondence,

    V . E. Hubeny, S. Minwalla, and M. Rangamani, “The fluid/gravity correspondence,” inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: String theory and its Applications: From meV to the Planck Scale(2012) pp. 348–383, arXiv:1107.5780 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  63. [63]

    Radiation in fluid/gravity and the flat limit,

    G. Arenas-Henriquez, L. Ciambelli, F. Diaz, W. Jia, and D. Rivera-Betancour, “Radiation in fluid/gravity and the flat limit,” JHEP01, 086 (2026), arXiv:2508.01446 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  64. [64]

    Penrose and W

    R. Penrose and W. Rindler,SPINORS AND SPACE-TIME. VOL. 2: SPINOR AND TWISTOR METHODS IN SPACE-TIME GEOMETRY, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 1988)

    1988

  65. [65]

    Radiation from accelerated black holes in an anti-de Sitter universe,

    J. Podolsky, M. Ortaggio, and P. Krtous, “Radiation from accelerated black holes in an anti-de Sitter universe,” Phys. Rev. D68, 124004 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0307108

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  66. [66]

    Hereε i jk is the Levi-Civita tensor,R (0) i j andR (0) are the Ricci curvatures of the boundary metricg (0) , and∇ (0) is its covariant derivative with respect to the Levi-Civita connection

  67. [67]

    Radiation in holography,

    L. Ciambelli, S. Pasterski, and E. Tabor, “Radiation in holography,” JHEP09, 124 (2024), arXiv:2404.02146 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  68. [68]

    The Robinson-Trautman spacetime and its holographic fluid,

    L. Ciambelli, A. C. Petkou, P. M. Petropoulos, and K. Siampos, “The Robinson-Trautman spacetime and its holographic fluid,” PoS CORFU2016, 076 (2017), arXiv:1707.02995 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  69. [69]

    Carroll Structures, Null Geometry and Conformal Isometries,

    L. Ciambelli, R. G. Leigh, C. Marteau, and P. M. Petropoulos, “Carroll Structures, Null Geometry and Conformal Isometries,” Phys. Rev. D 100, 046010 (2019), arXiv:1905.02221 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  70. [70]

    electric

    To be precise, the electric and magnetic parts of the Weyl tensor are defined by decomposing the Weyl curvature with respect to a timelike observer. In our case, since the boundary metric is Lorentzian, the decomposition is performed with respect to a spacelike vector instead. Nevertheless, within the AdS/CFT framework it remains standard practice to refe...

  71. [71]

    Lectures on hydrodynamic fluctuations in relativistic theories,

    P. Kovtun, “Lectures on hydrodynamic fluctuations in relativistic theories,” J. Phys. A45, 473001 (2012), arXiv:1205.5040 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  72. [72]

    Ehlers, Carroll, charges and dual charges,

    N. Mittal, P. M. Petropoulos, D. Rivera-Betancour, and M. Vilatte, “Ehlers, Carroll, charges and dual charges,” JHEP07, 065 (2023), arXiv:2212.14062 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  73. [73]

    Relativistic fluids, hydrodynamic frames and their Galilean versus Carrollian avatars,

    A. C. Petkou, P. M. Petropoulos, D. R. Betancour, and K. Siampos, “Relativistic fluids, hydrodynamic frames and their Galilean versus Carrollian avatars,” JHEP09, 162 (2022), arXiv:2205.09142 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  74. [74]

    Chern-Simons action and the Carrollian Cotton tensors,

    O. Miskovic, R. Olea, P. M. Petropoulos, D. Rivera-Betancour, and K. Siampos, “Chern-Simons action and the Carrollian Cotton tensors,” JHEP12, 130 (2023), arXiv:2310.19929 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  75. [75]

    However, the line element is stable under a class of suitable coordinate transformations that allow us to reach a gauge that makesmconstant

    In principle, the mass parametermcan depend onu. However, the line element is stable under a class of suitable coordinate transformations that allow us to reach a gauge that makesmconstant

  76. [76]

    The higher-derivative character of the RT equation arises because the metric contains an explicit dependence on the Laplacian of the deformed two-sphere

  77. [77]

    The Hodge dual acts on Carroll vectors as∗V A = ˜ηBAVB where ˜ηAB = √aεAB andε AB is the Levi-Civita symbol

  78. [78]

    Black funnels and droplets from the AdS C-metrics,

    V . E. Hubeny, D. Marolf, and M. Rangamani, “Black funnels and droplets from the AdS C-metrics,” Class. Quant. Grav.27, 025001 (2010), arXiv:0909.0005 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  79. [79]

    Holographic Thermodynamics of Accelerating Black Holes,

    A. Anabalón, M. Appels, R. Gregory, D. Kubiz ˇnák, R. B. Mann, and A. Ovgün, “Holographic Thermodynamics of Accelerating Black Holes,” Phys. Rev. D98, 104038 (2018), arXiv:1805.02687 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  80. [80]

    Accelerated black holes beyond Maxwell’s electrodynamics,

    J. Barrientos, A. Cisterna, D. Kubiznak, and J. Oliva, “Accelerated black holes beyond Maxwell’s electrodynamics,” Phys. Lett. B834, 137447 (2022), arXiv:2205.15777 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

Showing first 80 references.