Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 minor 66 references

Search for new physics using single-lepton events with high multiplicities of jets and b jets in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

T0 review · 0 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-06-27 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read No excess observed in high-multiplicity jet events, excluding gluinos below 1890 GeV at 95% CL.

desk verdict Routine CMS update on an RPV gluino search that tightens the mass limit to 1890 GeV with no excess observed. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.09567 v1 pith:2NOOAC5K submitted 2026-06-08 hep-ex

CMS Collaboration This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-ex
keywords supersymmetrygluinoR-parityviolationjetmultiplicityb-jettaggingCMSdetectorLHCnewphysicssearch
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports a search for new physics in proton-proton collisions that produce one lepton and many jets, some tagged as bottom-quark jets, without requiring missing transverse momentum. It targets R-parity violating supersymmetry where gluino pairs each decay to a top, bottom, and strange quark. Background is estimated from simulation and control regions, and the sum of large-radius jet masses serves as the main discriminant. No significant excess appears in the data, which allows the analysis to set an upper limit on gluino mass. This directly constrains one class of models that could produce visible high-multiplicity final states at the LHC.

What carries the argument

Sum of large-radius jet masses, used to capture the combined effect of high jet multiplicity and high interaction energy that distinguishes the signal from standard-model background.

What would settle it

A statistically significant excess in any of the high jet-multiplicity signal regions that persists after all background uncertainties are accounted for.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In 138 fb^{-1} of 13 TeV data, the observed event yields in the signal regions agree with background predictions within uncertainties. The search therefore excludes gluino masses below 1890 GeV at 95% confidence level for the specific decay mode in which each gluino produces one top, one bottom, and one strange quark.

Load-bearing premise

The background prediction from simulation and control regions accurately models the data in the high jet-multiplicity signal region without large unaccounted systematics.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Gluino pair production with this three-quark decay is ruled out up to 1890 GeV.
  • The same data set and selection can be reinterpreted for other R-parity violating decay modes.
  • Future runs with higher luminosity will extend the mass reach if background modeling remains stable.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The result tightens the parameter space available for baryon-number-violating supersymmetry that could be accessible at the LHC.
  • Similar high-multiplicity searches without missing energy could be applied to other new-physics scenarios that produce many quarks.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a search for R-parity violating supersymmetry in 13 TeV proton-proton collisions recorded with the CMS detector, corresponding to 138 fb^{-1}. It targets single-lepton events with high jet and b-jet multiplicities (no missing transverse momentum requirement) in a gluino pair-production model where each gluino decays to top, bottom, and strange quarks. The sum of large-radius jet masses serves as the primary discriminant between signal and background. No significant excess over background predictions is observed, leading to a 95% CL exclusion of gluino masses below 1890 GeV.

Significance. If the background modeling and limit-setting procedure hold, the result supplies a competitive constraint on baryon-number-violating SUSY scenarios that is complementary to MET-based searches. The choice of the jet-mass-sum observable is well-motivated for high-multiplicity final states and represents a standard yet effective experimental technique. The analysis follows conventional CMS practices for simulation-based background estimation validated in control regions.

minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract states the exclusion limit but does not quote the exact signal cross-section assumption or the 95% CL construction method (e.g., asymptotic CLs or profile likelihood); a one-sentence clarification would improve standalone readability.
  2. Figure captions and text should explicitly define the large-radius jet algorithm (e.g., anti-kT radius) and the precise jet pT and |η| thresholds used in the multiplicity selection.
  3. A brief statement on the treatment of the dominant systematic uncertainties (jet energy scale, b-tagging, luminosity) in the limit-setting procedure would strengthen the methods section.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript, the accurate summary of the analysis, and the recommendation for minor revision. No major comments were raised.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; standard experimental limit-setting

full rationale

The paper reports a null-result search for RPV gluino production using CMS data at 13 TeV. Background estimation combines simulation with control-region validation; the 95% CL mass limit follows directly from the observed data-to-background comparison in the signal region. No equations, self-citations, or ansatze reduce the quoted exclusion to a fitted parameter or prior result by construction. The derivation chain is externally falsifiable against the recorded dataset and is therefore self-contained.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Relies on standard assumptions about detector response, jet reconstruction, and background modeling from prior CMS publications; no new free parameters or invented entities introduced in the abstract.

assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption Standard Model processes and detector effects are correctly simulated for background estimation
    Invoked to predict event yields in the signal region defined by jet multiplicity and sum of large-radius jet masses.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Search for new physics using single-lepton events with high multiplicities of jets and b jets in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2NOOAC5K

@misc{pith2026260609567,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Search for new physics using single-lepton events with high multiplicities of jets and b jets in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrts$ = 13 TeV},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2NOOAC5K}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.09567}
}
abstract

This paper presents a search for beyond the standard model physics using single-lepton events with a high multiplicity of jets, including those identified as bottom quark jets, without a requirement on missing transverse momentum. The analysis is based on proton-proton collision data collected with the CMS detector at the CERN LHC at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$. This search is sensitive to $R$-parity violating supersymmetry models, where supersymmetric particles can decay into standard-model particles through interactions that violate baryon number conservation. In particular, the signal model considered is gluino pair production, where each gluino decays into top, bottom, and strange quarks. The sum of large-radius jet masses is used to distinguish the signal from background, as it effectively captures the features of high jet multiplicity and high interaction energy. No significant excess of data over the background predictions is observed. Gluinos in this model have been excluded for masses below 1890 GeV at 95% confidence level.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.09567 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Example diagram for the simplified model used as the benchmark signal in strip detect Figure 1: Diagram of the signal model considered in this analysis. Gluinos are produced in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Distributions of Njet (left), Nb (middle), and MJ (right) for tt and signal events in two gluino mass scenarios, after applying the baseline selection, as described in Section 3. corresponding Nb bins in Nlep = 0 region are merged as well for consistency. In each (Nb , Njet) bin, the MJ template is used to predict the background and discriminate the signal from it. The dominant background in the high-Nb bins is tt, … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. shows the MJ shape comparisons between data and simulation in the κ factor measure￾ment regions for QCD multijet (left), W+jets (middle), and tt (right) in the high-Njet region. The simulation is normalized to data. 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 Events / (300 GeV) Data QCD multijet tt W+jets Other = 1200 GeV×0.01 g m~ m~g = 1800 GeV = 0 Nlep ≥ 9 Njet = 0 Nb (13 TeV) -1 CMS 138 fb 1 2 10 4 10 6 10 8 10… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The κ factors measured in control regions for the QCD multijet (yellow left), W+jets (purple middle), and tt (blue right) backgrounds. The upper and lower panels correspond to κ1 and κ2 , respectively. In each case, the three points indicate the κ values in each Njet b…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: shows the background-only post-fit MJ distributions in all analysis bins, while [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Cross section upper limits at 95% CL compared to the predicted cross section of gluino [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Upper bounds on supersymmetric particle masses

    R. Barbieri and G. F. Giudice, “Upper bounds on supersymmetric particle masses”,Nucl. Phys. B306(1988) 63,doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90171-X

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90171-x 1988

  2. [2]

    Naturalness, Chiral Symmetry, and Spontaneous Chiral Symmetry Breaking

    G. ’t Hooft, “Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking”, NATO Sci. Ser. B59(1980) 135,doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-7571-5_9

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-7571-5_9 1980

  3. [3]

    Dynamical breaking of supersymmetry

    E. Witten, “Dynamical breaking of supersymmetry”,Nucl. Phys. B188(1981) 513, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(81)90006-7. References 15

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(81)90006-7 1981

  4. [4]

    Supersymmetric technicolor

    M. Dine, W. Fischler, and M. Srednicki, “Supersymmetric technicolor”,Nucl. Phys. B189 (1981) 575,doi:10.1016/0550-3213(81)90582-4

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(81)90582-4 1981

  5. [5]

    Supercolor

    S. Dimopoulos and S. Raby, “Supercolor”,Nucl. Phys. B192(1981) 353, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(81)90430-2

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(81)90430-2 1981

  6. [6]

    Softly broken supersymmetry and SU(5)

    S. Dimopoulos and H. Georgi, “Softly broken supersymmetry and SU(5)”,Nucl. Phys. B 193(1981) 150,doi:10.1016/0550-3213(81)90522-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(81)90522-8 1981

  7. [7]

    Cancellation of quadratically divergent mass corrections in globally supersymmetric spontaneously broken gauge theories

    R. K. Kaul and P . Majumdar, “Cancellation of quadratically divergent mass corrections in globally supersymmetric spontaneously broken gauge theories”,Nucl. Phys. B199 (1982) 36,doi:10.1016/0550-3213(82)90565-X

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(82)90565-x 1982

  8. [8]

    Supersymmetry, supergravity and particle physics

    H. P . Nilles, “Supersymmetry, supergravity and particle physics”,Phys. Rept.110(1984) 1,doi:10.1016/0370-1573(84)90008-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-1573(84)90008-5 1984

Show all 66 references
  1. [9]

    The search for supersymmetry: probing physics beyond the standard model

    H. E. Haber and G. L. Kane, “The search for supersymmetry: probing physics beyond the standard model”,Phys. Rept.117(1985) 75,doi:10.1016/0370-1573(85)90051-1

    1985 doi

  2. [10]

    Supersymmetry and the scale of unification

    S. Dimopoulos, S. Raby, and F. Wilczek, “Supersymmetry and the scale of unification”, Phys. Rev. D24(1981) 1681,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.24.1681

    1981 doi

  3. [11]

    Low-energy predictions in supersymmetric grand unified theories

    L. E. Ib ´a˜nez and G. G. Ross, “Low-energy predictions in supersymmetric grand unified theories”,Phys. Lett. B105(1981) 439,doi:10.1016/0370-2693(81)91200-4

    1981 doi

  4. [12]

    The weak mixing angle and unification mass in supersymmetric SU(5)

    M. B. Einhorn and D. R. T. Jones, “The weak mixing angle and unification mass in supersymmetric SU(5)”,Nucl. Phys. B196(1982) 475, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(82)90502-8

    1982 doi

  5. [13]

    Predictions of supersymmetric grand unified theories

    W. J. Marciano and G. Senjanovi ´c, “Predictions of supersymmetric grand unified theories”,Phys. Rev. D25(1982) 3092,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.25.3092

    1982 doi

  6. [14]

    Phenomenology of the production, decay, and detection of new hadronic states associated with supersymmetry

    G. R. Farrar and P . Fayet, “Phenomenology of the production, decay, and detection of new hadronic states associated with supersymmetry”,Phys. Lett. B76(1978) 575, doi:10.1016/0370-2693(78)90858-4

    1978 doi

  7. [15]

    R-parity-violating supersymmetry

    R. Barbier et al., “R-parity-violating supersymmetry”,Phys. Rept.420(2005) 1, doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2005.08.006

    2005 doi

  8. [16]

    Minimal flavor violation supersymmetry: a natural theory forR-parity violation

    C. Cs ´aki, Y. Grossman, and B. Heidenreich, “Minimal flavor violation supersymmetry: a natural theory forR-parity violation”,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 095009, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.095009,arXiv:1111.1239

    2012 doi arXiv

  9. [17]

    Neutron-antineutron oscillation search using a 0.37 megaton-years exposure of super-kamiokande

    Super-Kamiokande Collaboration, “Neutron-antineutron oscillation search using a 0.37 megaton-years exposure of super-kamiokande”,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 012008, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.012008,arXiv:2012.02607

    2021 doi

  10. [18]

    Search forR-parity violating supersymmetry in pp collisions at√s=13 TeV using b jets in a final state with a single lepton, many jets, and high sum of large-radius jet masses

    CMS Collaboration, “Search forR-parity violating supersymmetry in pp collisions at√s=13 TeV using b jets in a final state with a single lepton, many jets, and high sum of large-radius jet masses”,Phys. Lett. B783(2018) 114, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.06.028,arXiv:1712.08920

    2018 doi arXiv

  11. [19]

    Searches forR-parity-violating supersymmetry in pp collisions at√s=8 TeV in final states with 0-4 leptons

    CMS Collaboration, “Searches forR-parity-violating supersymmetry in pp collisions at√s=8 TeV in final states with 0-4 leptons”,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 112009, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.112009,arXiv:1606.08076. 16

    2016 doi arXiv

  12. [20]

    Search forR-parity-violating supersymmetry in a final state containing leptons and many jets with the ATLAS experiment using √s=13 TeV proton-proton collision data

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search forR-parity-violating supersymmetry in a final state containing leptons and many jets with the ATLAS experiment using √s=13 TeV proton-proton collision data”,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 1023, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09761-x,arXiv:2106.09609

    2021 doi

  13. [21]

    High multiplicity searches at the LHC using jet masses

    A. Hook, E. Izaguirre, M. Lisanti, and J. G. Wacker, “High multiplicity searches at the LHC using jet masses”,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 055029, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.055029,arXiv:1202.0558

    2012 doi arXiv

  14. [22]

    Jet substructure by accident

    T. Cohen, E. Izaguirre, M. Lisanti, and H. K. Lou, “Jet substructure by accident”,JHEP 03(2013) 161,doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2013)161,arXiv:1212.1456

    2013 doi arXiv

  15. [23]

    Learning how to count: a high multiplicity search for the LHC

    S. El Hedri, A. Hook, M. Jankowiak, and J. G. Wacker, “Learning how to count: a high multiplicity search for the LHC”,JHEP08(2013) 136, doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2013)136,arXiv:1302.1870

    2013 doi arXiv

  16. [24]

    Search for massive supersymmetric particles decaying to many jets using the ATLAS detector in pp collisions at √s=8 TeV

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for massive supersymmetric particles decaying to many jets using the ATLAS detector in pp collisions at √s=8 TeV”,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 112016,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.112016,arXiv:1502.05686

    2015 doi arXiv

  17. [25]

    Search for new phenomena in final states with large jet multiplicities and missing transverse momentum at √s=8 TeV proton-proton collisions using the ATLAS experiment

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for new phenomena in final states with large jet multiplicities and missing transverse momentum at √s=8 TeV proton-proton collisions using the ATLAS experiment”,JHEP10(2013) 130,doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2013)130, arXiv:1308.1841. [Erratum:doi:10.1140/epj...

    2013 doi arXiv

  18. [26]

    Search for supersymmetry in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV in the single-lepton final state using the sum of masses of large-radius jets

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for supersymmetry in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV in the single-lepton final state using the sum of masses of large-radius jets”,JHEP08(2016) 122,doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2016)122,arXiv:1605.04608

    2016 doi arXiv

  19. [27]

    Search for supersymmetry inppcollisions at √s=13 TeV in the single-lepton final state using the sum of masses of large-radius jets

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for supersymmetry inppcollisions at √s=13 TeV in the single-lepton final state using the sum of masses of large-radius jets”,Phys. Rev. Lett.119 (2017) 151802,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.151802,arXiv:1705.04673

    2017 doi arXiv

  20. [28]

    HEPData record for this analysis, 2026.doi:10.17182/hepdata.172453

    2026 doi

  21. [29]

    Precision luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at√s=13 TeV in 2015 and 2016 at CMS

    CMS Collaboration, “Precision luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at√s=13 TeV in 2015 and 2016 at CMS”,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 800, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09538-2,arXiv:2104.01927

    2015 doi

  22. [30]

    CMS luminosity measurement for the 2017 data-taking period at√s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “CMS luminosity measurement for the 2017 data-taking period at√s=13 TeV”, CMS Physics Analysis Summary CMS-PAS-LUM-17-004, 2018

    2017

  23. [31]

    CMS luminosity measurement for the 2018 data-taking period at√s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “CMS luminosity measurement for the 2018 data-taking period at√s=13 TeV”, CMS Physics Analysis Summary CMS-PAS-LUM-18-002, 2018

    2018

  24. [32]

    The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC

    CMS Collaboration, “The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC”,JINST3(2008) S08004, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/S08004

    2008 doi

  25. [33]

    Development of the CMS detector for the CERN LHC Run 3

    CMS Collaboration, “Development of the CMS detector for the CERN LHC Run 3”, JINST19(2024) P05064,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/05/P05064, arXiv:2309.05466

    2024 doi

  26. [34]

    Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JINST15(2020) P10017, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/10/P10017,arXiv:2006.10165. References 17

    2020 doi

  27. [35]

    The CMS trigger system

    CMS Collaboration, “The CMS trigger system”,JINST12(2017) P01020, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/01/P01020,arXiv:1609.02366

    2017 doi arXiv

  28. [36]

    Performance of the CMS high-level trigger during LHC Run 2

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS high-level trigger during LHC Run 2”, JINST19(2024) P11021,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/11/P11021, arXiv:2410.17038

    2024 doi

  29. [37]

    Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC

    CMS Collaboration, “Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC”,JINST16(2021) P05014, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/16/05/P05014,arXiv:2012.06888

    2021 doi

  30. [38]

    Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JINST13(2018) P06015, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/06/P06015,arXiv:1804.04528

    2018 doi arXiv

  31. [39]

    Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker

    CMS Collaboration, “Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker”,JINST9(2014) P10009, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/9/10/P10009,arXiv:1405.6569

    2014 doi arXiv

  32. [40]

    The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations

    J. Alwall et al., “The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations”,JHEP07 (2014) 079,doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2014)079,arXiv:1405.0301

    2014 doi arXiv

  33. [41]

    A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms

    P . Nason, “A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms”,JHEP11(2004) 040,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/11/040, arXiv:hep-ph/0409146

    2004 doi arXiv

  34. [42]

    Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method

    S. Frixione, P . Nason, and C. Oleari, “Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method”,JHEP11(2007) 070, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/11/070,arXiv:0709.2092

    2007 doi arXiv

  35. [43]

    A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX

    S. Alioli, P . Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re, “A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX”,JHEP06(2010) 043, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2010)043,arXiv:1002.2581

    2010 doi arXiv

  36. [44]

    An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2

    T. Sj ¨ostrand et al., “An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2”,Comput. Phys. Commun.191(2015) 159,doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.01.024,arXiv:1410.3012

    2015 doi arXiv

  37. [45]

    A superspace module for the feynrules package

    C. Duhr and B. Fuks, “A superspace module for the feynrules package”,Comput. Phys. Commun.182(2011) 2404,doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2011.06.009,arXiv:1102.4191

    2011 doi arXiv

  38. [46]

    Ufo 2.0: the ‘universal feynman output’ format

    L. Darm ´e et al., “Ufo 2.0: the ‘universal feynman output’ format”,Eur. Phys. J. C83 (2023) 631,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11780-9,arXiv:2304.09883

    2023 doi

  39. [47]

    NNLL-fast 2.0: coloured sparticle production at the LHC Run 3 with √s=13.6 TeV

    W. Beenakker et al., “NNLL-fast 2.0: coloured sparticle production at the LHC Run 3 with √s=13.6 TeV”,SciPost Phys. Core7(2024) 072, doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysCore.7.4.072,arXiv:2404.18837

    2024 doi

  40. [48]

    Parton distributions from high-precision collider data

    R. D. Ball et al., “Parton distributions from high-precision collider data”,Eur. Phys. J. C 77(2017) 663,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5199-5

    2017 doi

  41. [49]

    Comparative study of various algorithms for the merging of parton showers and matrix elements in hadronic collisions

    J. Alwall et al., “Comparative study of various algorithms for the merging of parton showers and matrix elements in hadronic collisions”,Eur. Phys. J. C53(2008) 473, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-007-0490-5,arXiv:0706.2569. 18

    2008 doi arXiv

  42. [50]

    Merging meets matching in MC@NLO

    R. Frederix and S. Frixione, “Merging meets matching in MC@NLO”,JHEP12(2012) 061,doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2012)061,arXiv:1209.6215

    2012 doi arXiv

  43. [51]

    Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS PYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements

    CMS Collaboration, “Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS PYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements”,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 4, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7499-4,arXiv:1903.12179

    2020 doi

  44. [52]

    GEANT4—a simulation toolkit

    GEANT4 Collaboration, “GEANT4—a simulation toolkit”,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A506 (2003) 250,doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8

    2003 doi

  45. [53]

    Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector

    CMS Collaboration, “Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector”,JINST12(2017) P10003,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/10/P10003, arXiv:1706.04965

    2017 doi arXiv

  46. [54]

    The anti-kT jet clustering algorithm

    M. Cacciari, G. P . Salam, and G. Soyez, “The anti-kT jet clustering algorithm”,JHEP04 (2008) 063,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/04/063,arXiv:0802.1189

    2008 doi arXiv

  47. [55]

    FastJet user manual

    M. Cacciari, G. P . Salam, and G. Soyez, “FastJet user manual”,Eur. Phys. J. C72(2012) 1896,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-1896-2,arXiv:1111.6097

    2012 doi arXiv

  48. [56]

    Pileup subtraction using jet areas

    M. Cacciari and G. P . Salam, “Pileup subtraction using jet areas”,Phys. Lett. B659(2008) 119,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2007.09.077,arXiv:0707.1378

    2008 doi arXiv

  49. [57]

    Jet algorithms performance in 13 TeV data

    CMS Collaboration, “Jet algorithms performance in 13 TeV data”, technical report, 2017

    2017

  50. [58]

    Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV”,JINST13(2018) P05011, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/05/P05011,arXiv:1712.07158

    2018 doi arXiv

  51. [59]

    Efficient identification of boosted semileptonic top quarks at the LHC

    K. Rehermann and B. Tweedie, “Efficient identification of boosted semileptonic top quarks at the LHC”,JHEP03(2011) 059,doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2011)059, arXiv:1007.2221

    2011 doi arXiv

  52. [60]

    Search for direct pair production of supersymmetric top quarks decaying to all-hadronic final states in pp collisions at √s=8 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for direct pair production of supersymmetric top quarks decaying to all-hadronic final states in pp collisions at √s=8 TeV”,Eur. Phys. J. C76 (2016) 460,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4292-5,arXiv:1603.00765

    2016 doi arXiv

  53. [61]

    Search for direct pair production of the top squark in all-hadronic final states in proton-proton collisions at √s=8 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for direct pair production of the top squark in all-hadronic final states in proton-proton collisions at √s=8 TeV with the ATLAS detector”,JHEP 09(2014) 015,doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2014)015,arXiv:1406.1122

    2014 doi arXiv

  54. [62]

    Measurement of the cross section for t ¯t production with additional jets and b jets in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of the cross section for t ¯t production with additional jets and b jets in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JHEP07(2020) 125, doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2020)125,arXiv:2003.06467

    2020 doi

  55. [63]

    The CMS statistical analysis and combination tool: COMBINE

    CMS Collaboration, “The CMS statistical analysis and combination tool: COMBINE”, Comput. Softw. Big Sci.8(2024) 19,doi:10.1007/s41781-024-00121-4, arXiv:2404.06614

    2024 doi

  56. [64]

    Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics

    T. Junk, “Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics”, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A434(1999) 435,doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(99)00498-2, arXiv:hep-ex/9902006

    1999 doi arXiv

  57. [65]

    Presentation of search results: theCL s technique

    A. L. Read, “Presentation of search results: theCL s technique”,J. Phys. G28(2002) 2693, doi:10.1088/0954-3899/28/10/313. References 19

    2002 doi

  58. [66]

    Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics

    G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells, “Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics”,Eur. Phys. J. C71(2011) 1554, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1554-0,arXiv:1007.1727. 20 21 A The CMS Collaboration Yerevan Physics Institute, Yerevan, Armenia A. Hayrap...

    2011 doi arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed June 27, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.