Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 4 cited by

Anomalies, a mod 2 index, and dynamics of 2d adjoint QCD

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Massless 2d adjoint QCD confines—except N/2 charges when N is even

desk verdict The mod 2 index anomaly computations are the durable contribution; the R^2 phase conclusions are clearly labeled assumptions, and the paper deserves a serious referee. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.09858 v3 pith:2RGISVYS submitted 2019-08-26 hep-th cond-mat.str-el

Aleksey Cherman , Theodore Jacobson , Yuya Tanizaki , Mithat Ünsal This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thcond-mat.str-el PACS 11.15.-q11.30.Rd11.15.Pg11.10.Kk
keywords 2dadjointQCDmod2index'tHooftanomalycentersymmetrychiralbreakingBose-FermidegeneracySPTphaseMajoranafermion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper seeks to show that mixed 't Hooft anomalies, derived from a mod 2 index theorem, determine the low-energy phase of two-dimensional $SU(N)$ QCD with one massless adjoint Majorana fermion. The central result is that this theory confines test charges for $N>2$, except when $N$ is even: charges of $N$-ality $N/2$ are deconfined, because $\mathbb{Z}_N$ center symmetry breaks to $\mathbb{Z}_{N/2}$ while it stays unbroken for odd $N$. The same anomaly matching forces spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking for $N=4n,4n+2,4n+3$, and produces exact Bose-Fermi degeneracies for all states when $N$ is even despite the theory not being supersymmetric. If these conclusions are right, the massive version of the theory is also a non-trivial symmetry-protected topological phase for most $N$, including cases with numbers of interacting Majorana fermions divisible by 8.

What carries the argument

The central object is the mod 2 index of the adjoint Majorana Dirac operator: $\zeta = \dim\ker(\not{D})|_{\gamma=+1} \bmod 2$ is a topological invariant on closed orientable two-manifolds because every non-zero eigenvalue comes in a Kramers-doubled quartet. On $T^2$, evaluating $\zeta$ in spin-structure and 't Hooft-flux backgrounds gives $\zeta = \zeta_{\mathrm{free}}(s) + \frac{N}{2\pi}\int B \pmod 2$ for even $N$ and zero for odd $N$, while a charge-conjugation-twisted evaluation gives the $N=4n+3$ anomaly. The index does the work of deciding which tunneling events carry robust fermion zero modes and therefore which symmetries must break at low energies.

What would settle it

A lattice Monte Carlo computation for $SU(4)$ and $SU(6)$ adjoint QCD with a light adjoint Majorana fermion can measure $q$-string tensions from Polyakov-loop correlators on a large torus. The paper predicts $\sigma_{N/2}=0$ while $\sigma_1>0$ for even $N$; finding $\sigma_2=0$ with $\sigma_1>0$ at $N=4$ would support partial deconfinement, while $\sigma_2>0$ would refute it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that the mod 2 index $\zeta$ on $T^2$ has the form $\zeta = \zeta_{\mathrm{free}}(s) + \frac{N}{2\pi}\int B \pmod 2$ for even $N$ and vanishes for odd $N$, creating mixed anomalies between discrete chiral symmetry and center or fermion-parity symmetries. Anomaly matching then forces spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking for $N=4n,4n+2,4n+3$, and for even $N$ that same matching forces $\mathbb{Z}_N \to \mathbb{Z}_{N/2}$ breaking, so test charges of $N$-ality $N/2$ are screened while all other charges are confined. The zero-mode mechanism also explains the exact Bose-Fermi pairing of the full spectrum at even $N$, and with a negative fermion mass the gapped theory realizes non-trivial SPT phases, including $N=4n+3$ where the number of Majorana fermions is a multiple of 8.

Load-bearing premise

The central assumption is that the theory has no gapless excitations, so the 't Hooft anomalies must be matched by spontaneous symmetry breaking; if a gapless phase existed, the confinement and center-breaking conclusions would not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim is right, fundamental-representation test charges in massless 2d adjoint QCD have area-law confinement for all $N>2$ except even $N$, where only $N$-ality $N/2$ charges are screened.
  • For even $N$, the string-tension spectrum must obey $\sigma_q=\sigma_{N-q}=\sigma_{q+N/2}=\sigma_{-q+N/2}$ with $\sigma_{N/2}=0$, giving a distinctive lattice-verifiable signature.
  • The exact Bose-Fermi pairing for even $N$ means the $(-1)^F$-graded partition function on $T^2$ vanishes exactly, without any Goldstino, so the theory has supersymmetric-looking degeneracies without supersymmetry.
  • With a negative fermion mass, the gapped theory is a non-trivial SPT phase for most $N$, protected by center symmetry for even $N$ and by fermion parity plus charge conjugation for $N=4n+3$, so domain walls carry Majorana edge modes.
  • At large $N$ the even-odd distinction disappears, and bosonic and fermionic densities of states must match exactly, removing all Hagedorn growth from the graded partition function.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same anomaly logic should extend to two-dimensional gauge theories with several adjoint fermions; the mod 2 index for $N_f>1$ would predict which $N$-alities become deconfined.
  • The paper's computation on orientable manifolds leaves open non-orientable spacetimes; a natural testable extension is whether spacetime-reflection symmetries generate additional mixed anomalies, a point the paper itself flags as future work.
  • For $N=4n+1$, where no anomaly forces chiral breaking, the phase may depend on the marginal couplings; tuning $c_1,c_2$ could drive a chiral transition, giving a clean numerical test of the trivial-gapped prediction.
  • The exact Bose-Fermi cancellation at even $N$ can be read as a concrete interacting-field-theory instance of the spectral cancellations known as misaligned supersymmetry; studying finite-mass cancellations in this model could provide a proof-of-principle in two dimensions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies 2d SU(N) adjoint QCD with one massless Majorana fermion. Using a mod 2 index theorem for the Dirac operator on T^2 and S^2, the authors derive mixed 't Hooft anomalies involving discrete chiral symmetry (Z2)_chi with fermion parity, charge conjugation, and the one-form center symmetry Z_N^{[1]}. They then use anomaly matching, together with an explicit assumption that no gapless excitations exist, to conclude that chiral symmetry is spontaneously broken for N = 4n, 4n+2, and 4n+3, that center symmetry is unbroken for odd N, and that for even N it is spontaneously broken Z_N^{[1]} -> Z_{N/2}^{[1]}, implying deconfinement of test charges of N-ality N/2. The paper also shows exact Bose-Fermi degeneracies for even N, discusses the large-N limit and Hagedorn cancellations, and argues that massive deformations realize nontrivial fermionic SPT phases for most N, including N = 4n+3 where the number of Majorana fermions is a multiple of 8. A semiclassical analysis on small R x S^1 with periodic and anti-periodic boundary conditions is presented as supporting evidence.

Significance. If the central dynamical conclusions hold, the paper is an important contribution: it gives a unified anomaly-based derivation of confinement, chiral symmetry breaking, and center-symmetry realization in a non-supersymmetric 2d gauge theory, and it makes sharp falsifiable predictions (vanishing string tension of N-ality N/2, exact Bose-Fermi pairing for even N, and nontrivial SPT phases for specific N). The mod 2 index computations are explicit, internally consistent, and constitute the main technical strength of the paper: the spin-structure and 't Hooft flux dependence is worked out concretely on T^2, with an independent check on S^2 in Appendix B. The Bose-Fermi pairing claim for even N follows from the mod 2 index and the structure of the Hilbert space, and is robust even if the anomaly-matching assumptions were relaxed. I do not see circularity in the index computations themselves; however, the small-circle Hilbert-space constructions are organized by the expected anomaly pattern, and the model Hamiltonians are not derived, so they provide consistency checks rather than independent confirmation.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 5 (p. 22), Eq. (5.2)] The stated assumption that gapless excitations do not exist is load-bearing for the two headline R^2 results: spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking for N = 4n, 4n+2, 4n+3 and center breaking Z_N^{[1]} -> Z_{N/2}^{[1]} for even N. The trichotomy argument rules out intrinsic topological order, but option (b), a gapless phase, remains open. The coset central-charge computation c = 0 in Eq. (5.2) applies only to the symmetric coset model at lambda -> infinity with c1 = c2 = 0, as the text itself notes; the DLCQ numerics are suggestive but not a proof of a mass gap for all N and for the four-fermion deformations. Since the abstract and conclusions state these phase-structure results as findings, the manuscript should either supply a mass-gap argument covering the deformed theory or explicitly reclassify the R^2 conclusions as consequences of the minimal anomaly-matching scenario. As it stands, a gapless phase could in principle saturate the same anomalies without chiral symmetry breaking.
  2. [Sec. 5.1, Eq. (5.7) and footnote 13] The inference from spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking to the vanishing string tension for test charges of N-ality N/2, and hence to Z_N^{[1]} -> Z_{N/2}^{[1]}, is not a formal consequence of anomaly matching. The argument in footnote 13 is sketched in words rather than derived: it asserts that a test particle divides space into regions whose vacua must satisfy boundary conditions related by the broken 0-form symmetry, and that a non-vanishing string tension would contradict vacuum degeneracy. I do not see a rigorous derivation that rules out configurations where the domain-wall Majorana modes carry the N/2 charge but still have a finite energy cost per unit length. Since sigma_{N/2}=0 is exactly the deconfinement claim for even N, this step needs either a more precise Hamiltonian-level argument or an explicit caveat that it is part of the minimal scenario.
  3. [Sec. 7, Eqs. (7.22), (7.55), (7.57), (7.59)] The abstract and conclusions state that the R^2 results are 'confirmed by explicit calculations on small R x S^1', but the Hilbert-space spectra in Sec. 7 are obtained from model Hamiltonians whose coefficients (Delta E, epsilon, epsilon_1, epsilon_2, epsilon_4) are not matched to the underlying 2d theory. The GPY-potential calculation and the mod 2 index counting of robust zero modes are genuine semiclassical results, and they do show consistency with the anomaly pattern; however, the model Hamiltonians are constructed to satisfy the symmetry algebra and then diagonalized, so they illustrate the expected pattern rather than independently confirm the R^2 phase structure. The wording should be softened to reflect this distinction.
  4. [Sec. 5.2 and Sec. 7.2.1 (N = 5)] For N = 4n+1 the paper concludes that the theory 'can be in a trivial gapped phase', citing Fidkowski-Kitaev and showing in the N = 5 model that a singlet ground state is possible when the allowed operator ~O is included. This is plausible, but it is not a derivation from the gauge theory: the four-fermion couplings are not integrated out, and the model Hamiltonian in Eq. (7.59) simply includes all symmetry-allowed terms. This point is less central than the even-N claims, but it should be labelled as an inference rather than a result, especially because the paper also states that chiral symmetry breaking at N = 4n+1 may be parameter-dependent.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (8.18)] There is a typo in the equality of Hagedorn temperatures: the second expression should read beta^{(i)}_{H,f}, not beta^{(i)}_{H,b}.
  2. [Eq. (7.20)] The notation U_hat^{(ℓ1-ℓ2)}_S is used before defining negative powers of the center-symmetry operator; the intended meaning is clear from the context, but a one-line definition would help.
  3. [Sec. 5.1, string-tension discussion] The predicted four-fold degeneracy of string tensions, Eq. (5.7) and Fig. 2, would be a striking lattice-verifiable signature. It would be useful to state explicitly which of these degeneracies follow from the vanishing of sigma_{N/2} alone and which require additional assumptions such as unbroken charge conjugation.
  4. [Sec. 9, argument (d)] The critique of the Makeenko-Migdal argument in Ref. [35] is substantive, but the references to Chapter 8 of Ref. [157] are not self-contained; a short explanation of why the extra fermion-measure terms cannot be discarded in this context would make the objection easier to evaluate.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: central claims rest on independent mod-2 index computations and stated anomaly-matching assumptions; minor self-citations and small-circle model Hamiltonians do not make the derivation circular.

full rationale

The derivation chain is linear and non-circular. The mod-2 index theorem is stated as Theorem 1 and proved in Sec. 4.1, with citations to Witten and Dijkgraaf-Witten rather than to the authors' own prior work; Theorem 2 (Eq. 4.20) is then obtained by explicit zero-mode counting on T^2 (Sec. 4.3) and S^2 (Appendix B). The mixed 't Hooft anomalies are read off from the index, not assumed. The transition from anomaly to dynamics is explicitly conditional: Sec. 5 states 'in this paper we will assume that gapless excitations do not exist' and 'we will assume the minimal scenario that the anomalies are matched by spontaneous symmetry breaking for all values of N>=2.' This is a transparent limitation, not a circular redefinition: if a gapless phase existed, the R^2 conclusions would not follow, but the paper does not hide this dependence. The small-R x S^1 analysis in Sec. 7 uses model Hamiltonians (e.g., Eq. 7.22) chosen to satisfy the anomaly algebra, so those calculations are consistency checks rather than independent confirmations; however, the R^2 conclusions are not derived from those model Hamiltonians, and no parameters are fitted to data. The self-citations (Refs. [9,10,19-22,60]) are methodological or contextual and do not carry the central argument. No equation is shown to reduce to another by construction, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The abstract's phrase 'confirmed by explicit calculations on small R x S^1' slightly overstates the status of the semiclassical Hilbert-space illustrations, but this is an overstatement of evidence strength, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central anomaly computations rest on the mod 2 index theorem from prior work, while the dynamical conclusions add assumptions about the absence of gapless excitations, the absence of intrinsic topological order, and the minimal anomaly-matching scenario. The small-circle analysis uses model Hamiltonians with unmatched coefficients, listed as free parameters, and the SPT claims rely on external classification results from Fidkowski-Kitaev and cobordism theory.

free parameters (2)
  • c3 (four-fermion coupling set to 0) = 0
    The central SPT and anomaly claims assume the charge-conjugation symmetric point c3 = 0; a nonzero c3 would break (Z2)_C and remove the odd-N anomalies. This is a choice of parameter point, not a fit.
  • EFT model Hamiltonian coefficients (Delta E, eps, eps1, eps2, eps4)
    Introduced in Sec. 7 to illustrate symmetry-consistent spectra; they are not matched to the 2d theory. The paper states this explicitly, so they support only qualitative conclusions.
assumptions (8)
  • standard math Mod 2 index theorem for 2d Majorana Dirac operators (Theorems 1 and 2), from Witten, Atiyah-Singer, and Dijkgraaf-Witten.
    Used in Sec. 4 to compute fermion zero modes in twisted backgrounds; accepted as a background result from the cited literature.
  • domain assumption 't Hooft anomaly matching: anomalies of global symmetries must be reproduced in the low-energy theory.
    Invoked throughout Sec. 5 to convert anomalies into constraints on the ground-state structure.
  • domain assumption No gapless excitations in massless 2d adjoint QCD.
    Assumed in Sec. 5 after the coset central charge argument of Ref. [4]; the authors explicitly state 'in this paper we will assume that gapless excitations do not exist.'
  • domain assumption No intrinsic topological order in two spacetime dimensions.
    Used in Sec. 5 to restrict the possible low-energy phases matching the anomalies; cites Ref. [16].
  • domain assumption Minimal scenario: anomalies are matched by spontaneous symmetry breaking for all values of N >= 2.
    Explicitly assumed in Sec. 5; the semiclassical analysis provides evidence but not a full proof.
  • domain assumption Smooth large-N limit with fixed 't Hooft coupling and c1, c2, so even/odd differences vanish at N = infinity.
    Used in Sec. 8.1 to argue that Bose-Fermi degeneracies emerge at large odd N.
  • domain assumption For N = 4n+1, the Fidkowski-Kitaev Z8 classification implies a generic trivial gapped phase for 8k Majorana fermions.
    Used in Sec. 5.2 to conclude that chiral symmetry is not forced to break in the N = 4n+1 case.
  • domain assumption Discrete one-form symmetries cannot spontaneously break in two dimensions unless forced by an anomaly.
    Invoked in Sec. 3 to argue center symmetry remains unbroken at odd N; based on Ref. [6] and refined by the authors.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Anomalies, a mod 2 index, and dynamics of 2d adjoint QCD." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2RGISVYS

@misc{pith2026190809858,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Anomalies, a mod 2 index, and dynamics of 2d adjoint QCD},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2RGISVYS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.09858}
}
abstract

We show that $2$d adjoint QCD, an $SU(N)$ gauge theory with one massless adjoint Majorana fermion, has a variety of mixed 't Hooft anomalies. The anomalies are derived using a recent mod $2$ index theorem and its generalization that incorporates 't Hooft flux. Anomaly matching and dynamical considerations are used to determine the ground-state structure of the theory. The anomalies, which are present for most values of $N$, are matched by spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking. We find that massless $2$d adjoint QCD confines for $N >2$, except for test charges of $N$-ality $N/2$, which are deconfined. In other words, $\mathbb Z_N$ center symmetry is unbroken for odd $N$ and spontaneously broken to $\mathbb Z_{N/2}$ for even $N$. All of these results are confirmed by explicit calculations on small $\mathbb{R}\times S^1$. We also show that this non-supersymmetric theory exhibits exact Bose-Fermi degeneracies for all states, including the vacua, when $N$ is even. Furthermore, for most values of $N$, $2$d massive adjoint QCD describes a non-trivial symmetry-protected topological (SPT) phase of matter, including certain cases where the number of interacting Majorana fermions is a multiple of $8$. As a result, it fits into the classification of $(1+1)$d SPT phases of interacting Majorana fermions in an interesting way.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Bifrost-1: Bridging Multimodal LLMs and Diffusion Models with Patch-level CLIP Latents

    cs.CV 2025-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    In 2D SU(2) with a massless Majorana fermion, two of the four partition functions vanish in the continuum limit; the topological condensate approaches 0.162(3) per color degree of freedom, and there is no spontaneous ...

  2. Supercurrents and (Partial) Supersymmetry in Adjoint QCD$_2$ and Its Generalizations

    hep-th 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A conserved Lorentz covariant supercurrent is constructed in adjoint QCD2 and its generalizations, fixing the supersymmetric mass and yielding new fully supersymmetric gapless models.

  3. Fractionalization of flux tubes in 3d and screening by emergent electric charges in 2d

    hep-th 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In charge-n monopole theories on a twisted cylinder, even n gives complete screening with emergent ±2/n charges, while odd n keeps a reduced-tension confining string.

  4. Lattice study of two-dimensional SU(2) gauge theories with a single massless Majorana fermion

    hep-lat 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    For 2D SU(2) gauge theory with one massless Majorana fermion, only one of the two overlap zero-mode classes survives the continuum limit depending on boundary conditions, and a zero-mode-excluding 'topological condens...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

157 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Gauge Invariance and Mass. 2.,

    J. S. Schwinger, “Gauge Invariance and Mass. 2.,”Phys. Rev. 128 (1962) 2425–2429

    1962

  2. [2]

    A Two-Dimensional Model for Mesons,

    G. ’t Hooft, “A Two-Dimensional Model for Mesons,”Nucl. Phys. B75 (1974) 461

    1974

  3. [3]

    String spectrum of (1+1)-dimensional large N QCD with adjoint matter,

    S. Dalley and I. R. Klebanov, “String spectrum of (1+1)-dimensional large N QCD with adjoint matter,”Phys. Rev. D47 (1993) 2517–2527,arXiv:hep-th/9209049 [hep-th]

    arXiv 1993

  4. [4]

    Two-dimensional QCD coupled to adjoint matter and string theory,

    D. Kutasov, “Two-dimensional QCD coupled to adjoint matter and string theory,”Nucl. Phys. B414 (1994) 33–52,arXiv:hep-th/9306013 [hep-th]

    arXiv 1994

  5. [5]

    (1+1)-dimensional large N QCD coupled to adjoint fermions,

    G. Bhanot, K. Demeterfi, and I. R. Klebanov, “(1+1)-dimensional large N QCD coupled to adjoint fermions,”Phys. Rev. D48 (1993) 4980–4990,arXiv:hep-th/9307111 [hep-th]

    arXiv 1993

  6. [6]

    Generalized Global Symmetries,

    D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg, and B. Willett, “Generalized Global Symmetries,”JHEP 02 (2015) 172, arXiv:1412.5148 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2015

  7. [7]

    Coupling a QFT to a TQFT and Duality,

    A. Kapustin and N. Seiberg, “Coupling a QFT to a TQFT and Duality,”JHEP 04 (2014) 001, arXiv:1401.0740 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2014

  8. [8]

    Theta, Time Reversal, and Temperature,

    D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, Z. Komargodski, and N. Seiberg, “Theta, Time Reversal, and Temperature,”JHEP 05 (2017) 091, arXiv:1703.00501 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2017

Show all 157 references
  1. [9]

    Magnetic bion condensation: A New mechanism of confinement and mass gap in four dimensions,

    M. Unsal, “Magnetic bion condensation: A New mechanism of confinement and mass gap in four dimensions,”Phys. Rev. D80 (2009) 065001, arXiv:0709.3269 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Center-stabilized Yang-Mills theory: Confinement and large N volume independence,

    M. Unsal and L. G. Yaffe, “Center-stabilized Yang-Mills theory: Confinement and large N volume independence,”Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 065035, arXiv:0803.0344 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Unpaired Majorana fermions in quantum wires,

    A. Y. Kitaev, “Unpaired Majorana fermions in quantum wires,”Phys. Usp. 44 no. 10S, (2001) 131–136,arXiv:cond-mat/0010440 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2001 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Periodic table for topological insulators and superconductors,

    A. Kitaev, “Periodic table for topological insulators and superconductors,”AIP Conf. Proc. 1134 no. 1, (2009) 22–30,arXiv:0901.2686 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2009 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Topological insulators and superconductors: Tenfold way and dimensional hierarchy,

    S. Ryu, A. P. Schnyder, A. Furusaki, and A. W. W. Ludwig, “Topological insulators and superconductors: Tenfold way and dimensional hierarchy,”New J. Phys.12 (2010) 065010, arXiv:0912.2157 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2010 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Topological phases of fermions in one dimension,

    L. Fidkowski and A. Kitaev, “Topological phases of fermions in one dimension,”Phys. Rev. B 83 (Feb, 2011) 075103.https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.83.075103. – 60 –

    2011 doi

  7. [15]

    The effects of interactions on the topological classification of free fermion systems,

    L. Fidkowski and A. Kitaev, “The effects of interactions on the topological classification of free fermion systems,”Phys. Rev. B81 (2010) 134509, arXiv:0904.2197 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2010 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Classification of gapped symmetric phases in one-dimensional spin systems,

    X. Chen, Z.-C. Gu, and X.-G. Wen, “Classification of gapped symmetric phases in one-dimensional spin systems,”Phys. Rev. B83 (2011) 035107, arXiv:1008.3745 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2011 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Fermionic Symmetry Protected Topological Phases and Cobordisms,

    A. Kapustin, R. Thorngren, A. Turzillo, and Z. Wang, “Fermionic Symmetry Protected Topological Phases and Cobordisms,”JHEP 12 (2015) 052, arXiv:1406.7329 [cond-mat.str-el]. [JHEP12,052(2015)]

    2015 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Free and Interacting Short-Range Entangled Phases of Fermions: Beyond the Ten-Fold Way,

    Y.-A. Chen, A. Kapustin, A. Turzillo, and M. You, “Free and Interacting Short-Range Entangled Phases of Fermions: Beyond the Ten-Fold Way,”arXiv:1809.04958 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv

  11. [19]

    Volume Independence in the LargeN Limit and an Emergent Fermionic Symmetry,

    G. Basar, A. Cherman, D. Dorigoni, and M. Ünsal, “Volume Independence in the LargeN Limit and an Emergent Fermionic Symmetry,”Phys. Rev. Lett.111 no. 12, (2013) 121601, arXiv:1306.2960 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Bose-Fermi degeneracies in largeN adjoint QCD,

    G. Basar, A. Cherman, and D. A. McGady, “Bose-Fermi degeneracies in largeN adjoint QCD,”JHEP 07 (2015) 016, arXiv:1409.1617 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Modularity and 4D-2D spectral equivalences for large-N gauge theories with adjoint matter,

    G. Başar, A. Cherman, K. R. Dienes, and D. A. McGady, “Modularity and 4D-2D spectral equivalences for large-N gauge theories with adjoint matter,”JHEP 06 (2016) 148, arXiv:1512.07918 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Bose-Fermi cancellations without supersymmetry,

    A. Cherman, M. Shifman, and M. Unsal, “Bose-Fermi cancellations without supersymmetry,” Phys. Rev. D99 no. 10, (2019) 105001,arXiv:1812.04642 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Symmetry protected topological orders and the group cohomology of their symmetry group,

    X. Chen, Z.-C. Gu, Z.-X. Liu, and X.-G. Wen, “Symmetry protected topological orders and the group cohomology of their symmetry group,”Phys. Rev. B87 no. 15, (2013) 155114, arXiv:1106.4772 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2013 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Physics of three dimensional bosonic topological insulators: Surface Deconfined Criticality and Quantized Magnetoelectric Effect,

    A. Vishwanath and T. Senthil, “Physics of three dimensional bosonic topological insulators: Surface Deconfined Criticality and Quantized Magnetoelectric Effect,”Phys. Rev. X3 no. 1, (2013) 011016, arXiv:1209.3058 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2013 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Continuum dynamics of the 1-D Heisenberg antiferromagnetic identification with the O(3) nonlinear sigma model,

    F. D. M. Haldane, “Continuum dynamics of the 1-D Heisenberg antiferromagnetic identification with the O(3) nonlinear sigma model,”Phys. Lett. A93 (1983) 464–468

    1983

  18. [26]

    Nonlinear field theory of large spin Heisenberg antiferromagnets. Semiclassically quantized solitons of the one-dimensional easy Axis Neel state,

    F. D. M. Haldane, “Nonlinear field theory of large spin Heisenberg antiferromagnets. Semiclassically quantized solitons of the one-dimensional easy Axis Neel state,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 50 (1983) 1153–1156

    1983

  19. [27]

    Rigorous Results on Valence Bond Ground States in Antiferromagnets,

    I. Affleck, T. Kennedy, E. H. Lieb, and H. Tasaki, “Rigorous Results on Valence Bond Ground States in Antiferromagnets,”Phys. Rev. Lett.59 (1987) 799

    1987

  20. [28]

    Symmetry protection of topological phases in one-dimensional quantum spin systems,

    F. Pollmann, E. Berg, A. M. Turner, and M. Oshikawa, “Symmetry protection of topological phases in one-dimensional quantum spin systems,”Phys. Rev. B85 (Feb, 2012) 075125. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.85.075125

    2012 doi

  21. [29]

    θ Vacua in Two-dimensional Quantum Chromodynamics,

    E. Witten, “θ Vacua in Two-dimensional Quantum Chromodynamics,”Nuovo Cim. A51 (1979) 325

    1979

  22. [30]

    Symmetries and mass splittings in QCD in two-dimensions – 61 – coupled to adjoint fermions,

    J. Boorstein and D. Kutasov, “Symmetries and mass splittings in QCD in two-dimensions – 61 – coupled to adjoint fermions,”Nucl. Phys. B421 (1994) 263–277,arXiv:hep-th/9401044 [hep-th]

    1994 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Quantum mechanics of the vacuum state in two-dimensional QCD with adjoint fermions,

    F. Lenz, M. A. Shifman, and M. Thies, “Quantum mechanics of the vacuum state in two-dimensional QCD with adjoint fermions,”Phys. Rev. D51 (1995) 7060–7082, arXiv:hep-th/9412113 [hep-th]

    1995 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Two-dimensional QCD with matter in adjoint representation: What does it teach us?,

    I. I. Kogan and A. R. Zhitnitsky, “Two-dimensional QCD with matter in adjoint representation: What does it teach us?,”Nucl. Phys. B465 (1996) 99–116, arXiv:hep-ph/9509322 [hep-ph]

    1996 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Lessons from QCD in two-dimensions (N→∞ ): Vacuum structure, asymptotic series, instantons and all that

    A. R. Zhitnitsky, “Lessons from QCD in two-dimensions (N→∞ ): Vacuum structure, asymptotic series, instantons and all that...”Phys.Rev. D53 (1996) 5821–5833, arXiv:hep-ph/9510366 [hep-ph]

    1996 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Instantons and fermion condensate in adjoint QCD in two-dimensions,

    A. V. Smilga, “Instantons and fermion condensate in adjoint QCD in two-dimensions,”Phys. Rev. D49 (1994) 6836–6848,arXiv:hep-th/9402066 [hep-th]

    1994 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Screening versus confinement in (1+1)-dimensions,

    D. J. Gross, I. R. Klebanov, A. V. Matytsin, and A. V. Smilga, “Screening versus confinement in (1+1)-dimensions,”Nucl. Phys. B461 (1996) 109–130,arXiv:hep-th/9511104 [hep-th]

    1996 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Mesonic spectra of bosonized QCD in two-dimensions models,

    A. Armoni and J. Sonnenschein, “Mesonic spectra of bosonized QCD in two-dimensions models,”Nucl. Phys. B457 (1995) 81–95,arXiv:hep-th/9508006 [hep-th]

    1995 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Two-dimensional instantons with bosonization and physics of adjoint QCD(2),

    A. V. Smilga, “Two-dimensional instantons with bosonization and physics of adjoint QCD(2),” Phys. Rev. D54 (1996) 7757–7773,arXiv:hep-th/9607007 [hep-th]

    1996 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Vacuum structure and Theta states of adjoint QCD in two-dimensions,

    L. D. Paniak, G. W. Semenoff, and A. R. Zhitnitsky, “Vacuum structure and Theta states of adjoint QCD in two-dimensions,”Nucl. Phys. B487 (1997) 191–206,arXiv:hep-th/9606194 [hep-th]

    1997 arXiv

  31. [39]

    (1+1)-dimensional Yang-Mills theory coupled to adjoint fermions on the light front,

    S. S. Pinsky, “(1+1)-dimensional Yang-Mills theory coupled to adjoint fermions on the light front,”Phys. Rev. D56 (1997) 5040–5049,arXiv:hep-th/9612073 [hep-th]

    1997 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Vacuum structure of two-dimensional gauge theories on the light front,

    G. McCartor, D. G. Robertson, and S. S. Pinsky, “Vacuum structure of two-dimensional gauge theories on the light front,”Phys. Rev. D56 (1997) 1035–1049,arXiv:hep-th/9612083 [hep-th]

    1997 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Adjoint QCD in two-dimensions and the nonAbelian Schwinger mechanism,

    S. Dalley, “Adjoint QCD in two-dimensions and the nonAbelian Schwinger mechanism,”Phys. Lett. B418 (1998) 160–166,arXiv:hep-th/9708115 [hep-th]

    1998 arXiv

  34. [42]

    QCD in two-dimensions screening, confinement and novel nonAbelian solutions,

    Y. Frishman and J. Sonnenschein, “QCD in two-dimensions screening, confinement and novel nonAbelian solutions,”Nucl. Phys. B496 (1997) 285–301,arXiv:hep-th/9701140 [hep-th]

    1997 arXiv

  35. [43]

    The String tension in massive QCD in two-dimensions,

    A. Armoni, Y. Frishman, and J. Sonnenschein, “The String tension in massive QCD in two-dimensions,”Phys. Rev. Lett.80 (1998) 430–433,arXiv:hep-th/9709097 [hep-th]

    1998 arXiv

  36. [44]

    The Spectrum of multiflavor QCD in two-dimensions and the nonAbelian Schwinger equation,

    A. Armoni, Y. Frishman, J. Sonnenschein, and U. Trittmann, “The Spectrum of multiflavor QCD in two-dimensions and the nonAbelian Schwinger equation,”Nucl. Phys. B537 (1999) 503–515,arXiv:hep-th/9805155 [hep-th]

    1999 arXiv

  37. [45]

    On the transition from confinement to screening in QCD(1+1) coupled to adjoint fermions at finite N,

    F. Antonuccio and S. Pinsky, “On the transition from confinement to screening in QCD(1+1) coupled to adjoint fermions at finite N,”Phys. Lett. B439 (1998) 142–149, arXiv:hep-th/9805188 [hep-th] . – 62 –

    1998 arXiv

  38. [46]

    The Spectrum of a large N gauge theory near transition from confinement to screening,

    D. J. Gross, A. Hashimoto, and I. R. Klebanov, “The Spectrum of a large N gauge theory near transition from confinement to screening,”Phys. Rev. D57 (1998) 6420–6428, arXiv:hep-th/9710240 [hep-th]

    1998 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Condensates and vacuum structure of adjoint QCD in two-dimensions,

    T. Fugleberg, I. E. Halperin, and A. Zhitnitsky, “Condensates and vacuum structure of adjoint QCD in two-dimensions,”Nucl. Phys. B515 (1998) 509–521,arXiv:hep-ph/9705281 [hep-ph]

    1998 arXiv

  40. [48]

    The String tension in two-dimensional gauge theories,

    A. Armoni, Y. Frishman, and J. Sonnenschein, “The String tension in two-dimensional gauge theories,”Int. J. Mod. Phys.A14 (1999) 2475–2494,arXiv:hep-th/9903153 [hep-th]

    1999 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Massless QCD(2) from current constituents,

    A. Armoni, Y. Frishman, and J. Sonnenschein, “Massless QCD(2) from current constituents,” Nucl. Phys. B596 (2001) 459–470,arXiv:hep-th/0011043 [hep-th]

    2001 arXiv

  42. [50]

    On the spectrum of QCD(1+1) with SU(N(c)) currents,

    U. Trittmann, “On the spectrum of QCD(1+1) with SU(N(c)) currents,”Phys. Rev. D66 (2002) 025001, arXiv:hep-th/0110058 [hep-th]

    2002 arXiv

  43. [51]

    The Spectrum of states with one current acting on the adjoint vacuum of massless QCD(2),

    A. Abrashkin, Y. Frishman, and J. Sonnenschein, “The Spectrum of states with one current acting on the adjoint vacuum of massless QCD(2),”Nucl. Phys. B703 (2004) 320–332, arXiv:hep-th/0405165 [hep-th]

    2004 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Frishman and J

    Y. Frishman and J. Sonnenschein,Non-perturbative field theory: From two-dimensional conformal field theory to QCD in four dimensions. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 2014. http://www.cambridge.org/catalogue/catalogue.asp?isbn=9780521662659

    2014

  45. [53]

    Preliminary study of two-dimensional SU(N) Yang-Mills theory with adjoint matter by Hybrid Monte Carlo approach,

    P. Korcyl and M. Koren, “Preliminary study of two-dimensional SU(N) Yang-Mills theory with adjoint matter by Hybrid Monte Carlo approach,”PoS LA TTICE2011(2011) 071, arXiv:1111.4682 [hep-lat]

    2011 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Solving 2D QCD with an adjoint fermion analytically,

    E. Katz, G. Marques Tavares, and Y. Xu, “Solving 2D QCD with an adjoint fermion analytically,”JHEP 05 (2014) 143, arXiv:1308.4980 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Center symmetry and the Hagedorn spectrum,

    A. Armoni, T. D. Cohen, and S. Sen, “Center symmetry and the Hagedorn spectrum,”Phys. Rev. D91 no. 8, (2015) 085007,arXiv:1502.01356 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Towards finding the single-particle content of two-dimensional adjoint QCD,

    U. Trittmann, “Towards finding the single-particle content of two-dimensional adjoint QCD,” Phys. Rev. D92 no. 8, (2015) 085021,arXiv:1506.08119 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  49. [57]

    A harmonic solution for two-dimensional adjoint QCD,

    U. Trittmann, “A harmonic solution for two-dimensional adjoint QCD,”Phys. Rev. D98 no. 4, (2018) 045011, arXiv:1806.00059 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  50. [58]

    A Simple Worldsheet Black Hole,

    S. Dubovsky, “A Simple Worldsheet Black Hole,”JHEP 07 (2018) 011, arXiv:1803.00577 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Confining Strings, Infinite Statistics and Integrability,

    J. C. Donahue and S. Dubovsky, “Confining Strings, Infinite Statistics and Integrability,” arXiv:1907.07799 [hep-th]

    1907 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Dihedral symmetry inSU (N) Yang-Mills theory,

    K. Aitken, A. Cherman, and M. Unsal, “Dihedral symmetry inSU (N) Yang-Mills theory,” arXiv:1804.05845 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  53. [61]

    Fermion Path Integrals And Topological Phases,

    E. Witten, “Fermion Path Integrals And Topological Phases,”Rev. Mod. Phys.88 no. 3, (2016) 035001, arXiv:1508.04715 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2016 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Dynamical Symmetry Breaking in Asymptotically Free Field Theories,

    D. J. Gross and A. Neveu, “Dynamical Symmetry Breaking in Asymptotically Free Field Theories,”Phys. Rev. D10 (1974) 3235. – 63 –

    1974

  55. [63]

    Generalized Schwinger model and a theory of interacting photons and Majorana fermions,

    P. F. Bedaque, A. K. Das, and W.-J. Huang, “Generalized Schwinger model and a theory of interacting photons and Majorana fermions,”Phys. Rev. D44 (1991) 1818–1824

    1991

  56. [64]

    A Property of Electric and Magnetic Flux in Nonabelian Gauge Theories,

    G. ’t Hooft, “A Property of Electric and Magnetic Flux in Nonabelian Gauge Theories,”Nucl. Phys. B153 (1979) 141–160

    1979

  57. [65]

    Reading between the lines of four-dimensional gauge theories,

    O. Aharony, N. Seiberg, and Y. Tachikawa, “Reading between the lines of four-dimensional gauge theories,”JHEP 08 (2013) 115, arXiv:1305.0318 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  58. [66]

    The Hagedorn transition, deconfinement and N=4 SYM theory,

    B. Sundborg, “The Hagedorn transition, deconfinement and N=4 SYM theory,”Nucl. Phys. B573 (2000) 349–363,arXiv:hep-th/9908001 [hep-th]

    2000 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Gauge fields and space-time,

    A. M. Polyakov, “Gauge fields and space-time,”Int. J. Mod. Phys.A17S1 (2002) 119–136, arXiv:hep-th/0110196 [hep-th]

    2002 arXiv

  60. [68]

    The Hagedorn - deconfinement phase transition in weakly coupled large N gauge theories,

    O. Aharony, J. Marsano, S. Minwalla, K. Papadodimas, and M. Van Raamsdonk, “The Hagedorn - deconfinement phase transition in weakly coupled large N gauge theories,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.8 (2004) 603–696,arXiv:hep-th/0310285 [hep-th] . [,161(2003)]

    2004 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Anomaly matching, (axial) Schwinger models, and high-T super Yang-Mills domain walls,

    M. M. Anber and E. Poppitz, “Anomaly matching, (axial) Schwinger models, and high-T super Yang-Mills domain walls,”JHEP 09 (2018) 076, arXiv:1807.00093 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Vacuum structure of charge k two-dimensional QED and dynamics of an anti D-string near an O1−-plane,

    A. Armoni and S. Sugimoto, “Vacuum structure of charge k two-dimensional QED and dynamics of an anti D-string near an O1−-plane,”JHEP 03 (2019) 175, arXiv:1812.10064 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Fractionalθ angle, ’t Hooft anomaly, and quantum instantons in charge-q multi-flavor Schwinger model,

    T. Misumi, Y. Tanizaki, and M. Ünsal, “Fractionalθ angle, ’t Hooft anomaly, and quantum instantons in charge-q multi-flavor Schwinger model,”JHEP 07 (2019) 018, arXiv:1905.05781 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Charge Shielding and Quark Confinement in the Massive Schwinger Model,

    S. R. Coleman, R. Jackiw, and L. Susskind, “Charge Shielding and Quark Confinement in the Massive Schwinger Model,”Annals Phys. 93 (1975) 267

    1975

  65. [73]

    The Schwinger Model and Its Axial Anomaly,

    N. S. Manton, “The Schwinger Model and Its Axial Anomaly,”Annals Phys. 159 (1985) 220–251

    1985

  66. [74]

    Hamiltonian Formulation of the Schwinger Model: Nonconfinement and Screening of the Charge,

    S. Iso and H. Murayama, “Hamiltonian Formulation of the Schwinger Model: Nonconfinement and Screening of the Charge,”Prog. Theor. Phys.84 (1990) 142–163

    1990

  67. [75]

    Notes on gauging noneffective group actions,

    T. Pantev and E. Sharpe, “Notes on gauging noneffective group actions,” arXiv:hep-th/0502027 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  68. [76]

    GLSM’s for Gerbes (and other toric stacks),

    T. Pantev and E. Sharpe, “GLSM’s for Gerbes (and other toric stacks),”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 10 no. 1, (2006) 77–121,arXiv:hep-th/0502053 [hep-th]

    2006 arXiv

  69. [77]

    String compactifications on Calabi-Yau stacks,

    T. Pantev and E. Sharpe, “String compactifications on Calabi-Yau stacks,”Nucl. Phys. B733 (2006) 233–296,arXiv:hep-th/0502044 [hep-th]

    2006 arXiv

  70. [78]

    The index of elliptic operators: V,

    M. F. Atiyah and I. M. Singer, “The index of elliptic operators: V,”Annals of Mathematics93 no. 1, (1971) 139–149.http://www.jstor.org/stable/1970757

    1971

  71. [79]

    Developments in Topological Gravity,

    R. Dijkgraaf and E. Witten, “Developments in Topological Gravity,”Int. J. Mod. Phys.A33 no. 30, (2018) 1830029,arXiv:1804.03275 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Anomalies and Bosonization,

    R. Thorngren, “Anomalies and Bosonization,”arXiv:1810.04414 [cond-mat.str-el] . – 64 –

    arXiv

  73. [81]

    Chiral and Geometric Anomalies in Finite Systems,

    D. Radicevic, “Chiral and Geometric Anomalies in Finite Systems,”arXiv:1811.04906 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  74. [82]

    A Web of 2d Dualities:Z2 Gauge Fields and Arf Invariants,

    A. Karch, D. Tong, and C. Turner, “A Web of 2d Dualities:Z2 Gauge Fields and Arf Invariants,”arXiv:1902.05550 [hep-th]

    1902 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Notes on 8 Majorana Fermions,

    D. Tong and C. Turner, “Notes on 8 Majorana Fermions,”arXiv:1906.07199 [hep-th]

    1906 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Majorana Positivity and the Fermion Sign Problem of Quantum Monte Carlo Simulations,

    Z. C. Wei, C. Wu, Y. Li, S. Zhang, and T. Xiang, “Majorana Positivity and the Fermion Sign Problem of Quantum Monte Carlo Simulations,”Phys. Rev. Lett.116 no. 25, (2016) 250601, arXiv:1601.01994 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2016 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Characterization of Reflection Positivity: Majoranas and Spins,

    A. Jaffe and B. Janssens, “Characterization of Reflection Positivity: Majoranas and Spins,” Commun. Math. Phys.346 no. 3, (2016) 1021–1050,arXiv:1506.04197 [math-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Classification of sign-problem-free relativistic fermions on the basis of the Majorana positivity,

    T. Hayata and A. Yamamoto, “Classification of sign-problem-free relativistic fermions on the basis of the Majorana positivity,”PTEP 2017 no. 4, (2017) 043B08,arXiv:1701.07182 [hep-lat]

    2017 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking,

    G. ’t Hooft, “Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking,” in Recent Developments in Gauge Theories. Proceedings, Nato Advanced Study Institute, Cargese, France, August 26 - September 8, 1979, vol. 59, pp. 135–157. 1980

    1979

  80. [88]

    The Axial Anomaly and the Bound State Spectrum in Confining Theories,

    Y. Frishman, A. Schwimmer, T. Banks, and S. Yankielowicz, “The Axial Anomaly and the Bound State Spectrum in Confining Theories,”Nucl. Phys. B177 (1981) 157–171

    1981

  81. [89]

    ’t Hooft’s Consistency Condition as a Consequence of Analyticity and Unitarity,

    S. R. Coleman and B. Grossman, “’t Hooft’s Consistency Condition as a Consequence of Analyticity and Unitarity,”Nucl. Phys. B203 (1982) 205–220

    1982

  82. [90]

    Classifying gauge anomalies through symmetry-protected trivial orders and classifying gravitational anomalies through topological orders,

    X.-G. Wen, “Classifying gauge anomalies through symmetry-protected trivial orders and classifying gravitational anomalies through topological orders,”Phys. Rev. D88 no. 4, (2013) 045013, arXiv:1303.1803 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Anomalies of discrete symmetries in various dimensions and group cohomology,

    A. Kapustin and R. Thorngren, “Anomalies of discrete symmetries in various dimensions and group cohomology,”arXiv:1404.3230 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  84. [92]

    Conflicting Symmetries in Topologically Ordered Surface States of Three-dimensional Bosonic Symmetry Protected Topological Phases,

    G. Y. Cho, J. C. Y. Teo, and S. Ryu, “Conflicting Symmetries in Topologically Ordered Surface States of Three-dimensional Bosonic Symmetry Protected Topological Phases,”Phys. Rev. B89 no. 23, (2014) 235103,arXiv:1403.2018 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2014 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Field theory representation of gauge-gravity symmetry-protected topological invariants, group cohomology and beyond,

    J. C. Wang, Z.-C. Gu, and X.-G. Wen, “Field theory representation of gauge-gravity symmetry-protected topological invariants, group cohomology and beyond,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 no. 3, (2015) 031601,arXiv:1405.7689 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2015 arXiv

  86. [94]

    The "Parity

    E. Witten, “The "Parity" Anomaly On An Unorientable Manifold,”Phys. Rev. B94 no. 19, (2016) 195150, arXiv:1605.02391 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  87. [95]

    On time-reversal anomaly of 2+1d topological phases,

    Y. Tachikawa and K. Yonekura, “On time-reversal anomaly of 2+1d topological phases,” PTEP 2017 no. 3, (2017) 033B04,arXiv:1610.07010 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Vacuum structure of bifundamental gauge theories at finite topological angles,

    Y. Tanizaki and Y. Kikuchi, “Vacuum structure of bifundamental gauge theories at finite topological angles,”JHEP 06 (2017) 102, arXiv:1705.01949 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Global inconsistency, ’t Hooft anomaly, and level crossing in quantum mechanics,

    Y. Kikuchi and Y. Tanizaki, “Global inconsistency, ’t Hooft anomaly, and level crossing in quantum mechanics,”Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys.2017 (2017) 113B05, arXiv:1708.01962 [hep-th]. – 65 –

    2017 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Comments on Abelian Higgs Models and Persistent Order,

    Z. Komargodski, A. Sharon, R. Thorngren, and X. Zhou, “Comments on Abelian Higgs Models and Persistent Order,”SciPost Phys. 6 no. 1, (2019) 003,arXiv:1705.04786 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Walls, anomalies, and deconfinement in quantum antiferromagnets,

    Z. Komargodski, T. Sulejmanpasic, and M. Unsal, “Walls, anomalies, and deconfinement in quantum antiferromagnets,”Phys. Rev. B97 no. 5, (2018) 054418,arXiv:1706.05731 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2018 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Anomaly constraints on deconfinement and chiral phase transition,

    H. Shimizu and K. Yonekura, “Anomaly constraints on deconfinement and chiral phase transition,”Phys. Rev. D97 no. 10, (2018) 105011,arXiv:1706.06104 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  93. [101]

    Symmetric Gapped Interfaces of SPT and SET States: Systematic Constructions,

    J. Wang, X.-G. Wen, and E. Witten, “Symmetric Gapped Interfaces of SPT and SET States: Systematic Constructions,”Phys. Rev. X8 no. 3, (2018) 031048,arXiv:1705.06728 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2018 arXiv

  94. [102]

    Time-reversal breaking in QCD4, walls, and dualities in 2 + 1 dimensions,

    D. Gaiotto, Z. Komargodski, and N. Seiberg, “Time-reversal breaking in QCD4, walls, and dualities in 2 + 1 dimensions,”JHEP 01 (2018) 110, arXiv:1708.06806 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  95. [103]

    Circle compactification and ’t Hooft anomaly,

    Y. Tanizaki, T. Misumi, and N. Sakai, “Circle compactification and ’t Hooft anomaly,”JHEP 12 (2017) 056, arXiv:1710.08923 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  96. [104]

    Anomaly matching for phase diagram of massless ZN-QCD,

    Y. Tanizaki, Y. Kikuchi, T. Misumi, and N. Sakai, “Anomaly matching for phase diagram of massless ZN-QCD,”Phys. Rev. D97 (2018) 054012, arXiv:1711.10487 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Critical behavior of gauge theories and Coulomb gases in three and four dimensions,

    A. Cherman and M. Unsal, “Critical behavior of gauge theories and Coulomb gases in three and four dimensions,”arXiv:1711.10567 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  98. [106]

    Relating ’t Hooft Anomalies of 4d Pure Yang-Mills and 2dCPN −1 Model,

    M. Yamazaki, “Relating ’t Hooft Anomalies of 4d Pure Yang-Mills and 2dCPN −1 Model,” JHEP 10 (2018) 172, arXiv:1711.04360 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  99. [107]

    Time reversal, SU(N) Yang-Mills and cobordisms: Interacting topological superconductors/insulators and quantum spin liquids in 3+1D,

    M. Guo, P. Putrov, and J. Wang, “Time reversal, SU(N) Yang-Mills and cobordisms: Interacting topological superconductors/insulators and quantum spin liquids in 3+1D,”Annals Phys. 394 (2018) 244–293,arXiv:1711.11587 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2018 arXiv

  100. [108]

    C-P-T anomaly matching in bosonic quantum field theory and spin chains,

    T. Sulejmanpasic and Y. Tanizaki, “C-P-T anomaly matching in bosonic quantum field theory and spin chains,”Phys. Rev. B97 (2018) 144201, arXiv:1802.02153 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  101. [109]

    Anomaly and global inconsistency matching:θ-angles, SU (3)/U(1)2 nonlinear sigma model,SU (3) chains and its generalizations,

    Y. Tanizaki and T. Sulejmanpasic, “Anomaly and global inconsistency matching:θ-angles, SU (3)/U(1)2 nonlinear sigma model,SU (3) chains and its generalizations,”Phys. Rev. B98 no. 11, (2018) 115126,arXiv:1805.11423 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2018 arXiv

  102. [110]

    Lieb-Schultz-Mattis type theorem with higher-form symmetry and the quantum dimer models,

    R. Kobayashi, K. Shiozaki, Y. Kikuchi, and S. Ryu, “Lieb-Schultz-Mattis type theorem with higher-form symmetry and the quantum dimer models,”Phys. Rev. B99 no. 1, (2019) 014402, arXiv:1805.05367 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2019 arXiv

  103. [111]

    Candidate Phases for SU(2) Adjoint QCD4 with Two Flavors fromN = 2 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory,

    C. Cordova and T. T. Dumitrescu, “Candidate Phases for SU(2) Adjoint QCD4 with Two Flavors fromN = 2 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory,”arXiv:1806.09592 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  104. [112]

    Two-flavor adjoint QCD,

    M. M. Anber and E. Poppitz, “Two-flavor adjoint QCD,”Phys. Rev. D98 no. 3, (2018) 034026, arXiv:1805.12290 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  105. [113]

    Anomaly constraint on massless QCD and the role of Skyrmions in chiral symmetry breaking,

    Y. Tanizaki, “Anomaly constraint on massless QCD and the role of Skyrmions in chiral symmetry breaking,”JHEP 08 (2018) 171, arXiv:1807.07666 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  106. [114]

    Domain walls in high-TSU (N) super Yang-Mills theory and QCD(adj),

    M. M. Anber and E. Poppitz, “Domain walls in high-TSU (N) super Yang-Mills theory and QCD(adj),”arXiv:1811.10642 [hep-th] . – 66 –

    arXiv

  107. [115]

    Phase structure of the twistedSU (3)/U(1)2 flag sigma model onR×S1,

    M. Hongo, T. Misumi, and Y. Tanizaki, “Phase structure of the twistedSU (3)/U(1)2 flag sigma model onR×S1,”JHEP 02 (2019) 070, arXiv:1812.02259 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  108. [116]

    Adjoint QCD4, Deconfined Critical Phenomena, Symmetry-Enriched Topological Quantum Field Theory, and Higher Symmetry-Extension,

    Z. Wan and J. Wang, “Adjoint QCD4, Deconfined Critical Phenomena, Symmetry-Enriched Topological Quantum Field Theory, and Higher Symmetry-Extension,”Phys. Rev. D99 no. 6, (2019) 065013, arXiv:1812.11955 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  109. [117]

    Anomaly matching in QCD thermal phase transition,

    K. Yonekura, “Anomaly matching in QCD thermal phase transition,”JHEP 05 (2019) 062, arXiv:1901.08188 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  110. [118]

    Path Integral Measure for Gauge Invariant Fermion Theories,

    K. Fujikawa, “Path Integral Measure for Gauge Invariant Fermion Theories,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 42 (1979) 1195–1198

    1979

  111. [119]

    Path Integral for Gauge Theories with Fermions,

    K. Fujikawa, “Path Integral for Gauge Theories with Fermions,”Phys. Rev. D21 (1980) 2848. [Erratum: Phys. Rev.D22,1499(1980)]

    1980

  112. [120]

    Nonabelian Bosonization in Two-Dimensions,

    E. Witten, “Nonabelian Bosonization in Two-Dimensions,”Commun. Math. Phys.92 (1984) 455–472. [,201(1983)]

    1984

  113. [121]

    Di Francesco, P

    P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu, and D. Senechal,Conformal Field Theory. Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997. http://www-spires.fnal.gov/spires/find/books/www?cl=QC174.52.C66D5::1997

    1997

  114. [122]

    Strings from domain walls in supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory and adjoint QCD,

    M. M. Anber, E. Poppitz, and T. Sulejmanpasic, “Strings from domain walls in supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory and adjoint QCD,”Phys. Rev. D92 no. 2, (2015) 021701, arXiv:1501.06773 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  115. [123]

    Confinement in the bulk, deconfinement on the wall: infrared equivalence between compactified QCD and quantum magnets,

    T. Sulejmanpasic, H. Shao, A. Sandvik, and M. Unsal, “Confinement in the bulk, deconfinement on the wall: infrared equivalence between compactified QCD and quantum magnets,”Phys. Rev. Lett.119 no. 9, (2017) 091601,arXiv:1608.09011 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  116. [124]

    High-temperature domain walls of QCD with imaginary chemical potentials,

    H. Nishimura and Y. Tanizaki, “High-temperature domain walls of QCD with imaginary chemical potentials,”JHEP 06 (2019) 040, arXiv:1903.04014 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  117. [125]

    Anomalies and Fermion Zero Modes on Strings and Domain Walls,

    C. G. Callan, Jr. and J. A. Harvey, “Anomalies and Fermion Zero Modes on Strings and Domain Walls,”Nucl. Phys. B250 (1985) 427–436

    1985

  118. [126]

    Solitons with Fermion Number 1/2,

    R. Jackiw and C. Rebbi, “Solitons with Fermion Number 1/2,”Phys. Rev. D13 (1976) 3398–3409

    1976

  119. [127]

    Modified instanton sum in QCD and higher-groups,

    Y. Tanizaki and M. Unsal, “Modified instanton sum in QCD and higher-groups,” arXiv:1912.01033 [hep-th]

    1912 arXiv

  120. [128]

    Parity Conservation in QCD,

    C. Vafa and E. Witten, “Parity Conservation in QCD,”Phys. Rev. Lett.53 (1984) 535

    1984

  121. [129]

    Parity and CT realization in QCD,

    V. Azcoiti and A. Galante, “Parity and CT realization in QCD,”Phys. Rev. Lett.83 (1999) 1518–1520,arXiv:hep-th/9901068 [hep-th]

    1999 arXiv

  122. [130]

    Validity of the Vafa-Witten proof on absence of spontaneous parity breaking in QCD,

    X.-d. Ji, “Validity of the Vafa-Witten proof on absence of spontaneous parity breaking in QCD,”Phys. Lett. B554 (2003) 33–37,arXiv:hep-ph/0108162 [hep-ph]

    2003 arXiv

  123. [131]

    Spontaneous parity violation in QCD at finite temperature: On the Inapplicability of the Vafa-Witten theorem,

    T. D. Cohen, “Spontaneous parity violation in QCD at finite temperature: On the Inapplicability of the Vafa-Witten theorem,”Phys. Rev. D64 (2001) 047704, arXiv:hep-th/0101197 [hep-th]

    2001 arXiv

  124. [132]

    Vafa-Witten theorem and Lee-Yang singularities,

    M. Aguado and M. Asorey, “Vafa-Witten theorem and Lee-Yang singularities,”Phys. Rev. D80 (2009) 127702, arXiv:hep-th/0204130 [hep-th] . – 67 –

    2009 arXiv

  125. [133]

    Symmetry Protected Topological Phases, Anomalies, and Cobordisms: Beyond Group Cohomology,

    A. Kapustin, “Symmetry Protected Topological Phases, Anomalies, and Cobordisms: Beyond Group Cohomology,”arXiv:1403.1467 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv

  126. [134]

    Bosonic Topological Insulators and Paramagnets: a view from cobordisms,

    A. Kapustin, “Bosonic Topological Insulators and Paramagnets: a view from cobordisms,” arXiv:1404.6659 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv

  127. [135]

    Reflection positivity and invertible topological phases,

    D. S. Freed and M. J. Hopkins, “Reflection positivity and invertible topological phases,” arXiv:1604.06527 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  128. [136]

    On the cobordism classification of symmetry protected topological phases,

    K. Yonekura, “On the cobordism classification of symmetry protected topological phases,” Commun. Math. Phys.368 no. 3, (2019) 1121–1173,arXiv:1803.10796 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  129. [137]

    QCD and Instantons at Finite Temperature,

    D. J. Gross, R. D. Pisarski, and L. G. Yaffe, “QCD and Instantons at Finite Temperature,” Rev. Mod. Phys.53 (1981) 43

    1981

  130. [138]

    Emergent dimensions and branes from large-N confinement,

    A. Cherman and E. Poppitz, “Emergent dimensions and branes from large-N confinement,” Phys. Rev. D94 no. 12, (2016) 125008,arXiv:1606.01902 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  131. [139]

    QCD on a small circle,

    K. Aitken, A. Cherman, E. Poppitz, and L. G. Yaffe, “QCD on a small circle,”Phys. Rev. D96 no. 9, (2017) 096022,arXiv:1707.08971 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  132. [140]

    Large N solution of the 2-d supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory,

    M. Li, “Large N solution of the 2-d supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory,”Nucl. Phys. B446 (1995) 16–34,arXiv:hep-th/9503033 [hep-th]

    1995 arXiv

  133. [141]

    Mass spectra of supersymmetric Yang-Mills theories in (1+1)-dimensions,

    Y. Matsumura, N. Sakai, and T. Sakai, “Mass spectra of supersymmetric Yang-Mills theories in (1+1)-dimensions,”Phys. Rev. D52 (1995) 2446–2461,arXiv:hep-th/9504150 [hep-th]

    1995 arXiv

  134. [142]

    QCD and the Hagedorn spectrum,

    T. D. Cohen, “QCD and the Hagedorn spectrum,”JHEP 06 (2010) 098, arXiv:0901.0494 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  135. [143]

    The Hagedorn spectrum and largeNc QCD in 2+1 and 3+1 dimensions,

    T. D. Cohen and V. Krejcirik, “The Hagedorn spectrum and largeNc QCD in 2+1 and 3+1 dimensions,”JHEP 08 (2011) 138, arXiv:1104.4783 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  136. [144]

    Number of degrees of freedom, density of states and tachyons in string theory and CFT,

    D. Kutasov and N. Seiberg, “Number of degrees of freedom, density of states and tachyons in string theory and CFT,”Nucl. Phys. B358 (1991) 600–618

    1991

  137. [145]

    Modular invariance, finiteness, and misaligned supersymmetry: New constraints on the numbers of physical string states,

    K. R. Dienes, “Modular invariance, finiteness, and misaligned supersymmetry: New constraints on the numbers of physical string states,”Nucl. Phys. B429 (1994) 533–588, arXiv:hep-th/9402006 [hep-th]

    1994 arXiv

  138. [146]

    String theory, misaligned supersymmetry, and the supertrace constraints,

    K. R. Dienes, M. Moshe, and R. C. Myers, “String theory, misaligned supersymmetry, and the supertrace constraints,”Phys. Rev. Lett.74 (1995) 4767–4770,arXiv:hep-th/9503055 [hep-th]

    1995 arXiv

  139. [147]

    Nonlinear strings in two-dimensionalU(∞) gauge theory,

    V. A. Kazakov and I. K. Kostov, “Nonlinear strings in two-dimensionalU(∞) gauge theory,” Nucl. Phys. B176 (1980) 199–215

    1980

  140. [148]

    Computation of the Wilson Loop Functional in Two-dimensional U(infinite) Lattice Gauge Theory,

    V. A. Kazakov and I. K. Kostov, “Computation of the Wilson Loop Functional in Two-dimensional U(infinite) Lattice Gauge Theory,”Phys. Lett. 105B (1981) 453–456

    1981

  141. [149]

    Two-dimensional QCD as a string theory,

    D. J. Gross, “Two-dimensional QCD as a string theory,”Nucl. Phys. B400 (1993) 161–180, arXiv:hep-th/9212149 [hep-th]

    1993 arXiv

  142. [150]

    Two-dimensional QCD is a string theory,

    D. J. Gross and W. Taylor, “Two-dimensional QCD is a string theory,”Nucl. Phys. B400 (1993) 181–208,arXiv:hep-th/9301068 [hep-th] . – 68 –

    1993 arXiv

  143. [151]

    Twists and Wilson loops in the string theory of two-dimensional QCD,

    D. J. Gross and W. Taylor, “Twists and Wilson loops in the string theory of two-dimensional QCD,”Nucl. Phys. B403 (1993) 395–452,arXiv:hep-th/9303046 [hep-th]

    1993 arXiv

  144. [152]

    Some properties of large N two-dimensional Yang-Mills theory,

    D. J. Gross and A. Matytsin, “Some properties of large N two-dimensional Yang-Mills theory,” Nucl. Phys. B437 (1995) 541–584,arXiv:hep-th/9410054 [hep-th]

    1995 arXiv

  145. [153]

    Universality in two-dimensional gauge theory,

    D. Kutasov and A. Schwimmer, “Universality in two-dimensional gauge theory,”Nucl. Phys. B442 (1995) 447–460,arXiv:hep-th/9501024 [hep-th]

    1995 arXiv

  146. [154]

    Exact Equation for the Loop Average in Multicolor QCD,

    Yu. M. Makeenko and A. A. Migdal, “Exact Equation for the Loop Average in Multicolor QCD,”Phys. Lett. 88B (1979) 135. [Erratum: Phys. Lett.89B,437(1980)]

    1979

  147. [155]

    Quantum Chromodynamics as Dynamics of Loops,

    Yu. Makeenko and A. A. Migdal, “Quantum Chromodynamics as Dynamics of Loops,”Nucl. Phys. B188 (1981) 269. [Yad. Fiz.32,838(1980)]

    1981

  148. [156]

    Nonperturbative equivalences among large N(c) gauge theories with adjoint and bifundamental matter fields,

    P. Kovtun, M. Unsal, and L. G. Yaffe, “Nonperturbative equivalences among large N(c) gauge theories with adjoint and bifundamental matter fields,”JHEP 12 (2003) 034, arXiv:hep-th/0311098 [hep-th]

    2003 arXiv

  149. [157]

    Path integrals and quantum anomalies,

    K. Fujikawa and H. Suzuki, “Path integrals and quantum anomalies,”Oxford, UK: Clarendon (2004) 284 p(2004) . – 69 –

    2004

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.