Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Manifold Free Riemannian Optimization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2209.03269 v1 pith:2RP4HVHE submitted 2022-09-07 math.OC cs.CGcs.NAmath.DGmath.NAstat.ML

Manifold Free Riemannian Optimization

classification math.OC cs.CGcs.NAmath.DGmath.NAstat.ML
keywords manifoldoptimizationriemanniancostframeworkfunctionmathcalmethod
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Riemannian optimization is a principled framework for solving optimization problems where the desired optimum is constrained to a smooth manifold $\mathcal{M}$. Algorithms designed in this framework usually require some geometrical description of the manifold, which typically includes tangent spaces, retractions, and gradients of the cost function. However, in many cases, only a subset (or none at all) of these elements can be accessed due to lack of information or intractability. In this paper, we propose a novel approach that can perform approximate Riemannian optimization in such cases, where the constraining manifold is a submanifold of $\R^{D}$. At the bare minimum, our method requires only a noiseless sample set of the cost function $(\x_{i}, y_{i})\in {\mathcal{M}} \times \mathbb{R}$ and the intrinsic dimension of the manifold $\mathcal{M}$. Using the samples, and utilizing the Manifold-MLS framework (Sober and Levin 2020), we construct approximations of the missing components entertaining provable guarantees and analyze their computational costs. In case some of the components are given analytically (e.g., if the cost function and its gradient are given explicitly, or if the tangent spaces can be computed), the algorithm can be easily adapted to use the accurate expressions instead of the approximations. We analyze the global convergence of Riemannian gradient-based methods using our approach, and we demonstrate empirically the strength of this method, together with a conjugate-gradients type method based upon similar principles.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Riemannian Archetypal Analysis: Interpretable non-linear data analysis on deformed star distributions

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Riemannian archetypal analysis projects data onto a manifold of geodesically convex archetype combinations via pullback geometry on deformed star distributions.

  2. Iso-Riemannian Optimization on Learned Data Manifolds

    math.OC 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Iso-Riemannian descent algorithm with convergence analysis under iso-convexity, iso-monotonicity and iso-Lipschitz conditions for optimization on learned Riemannian manifolds from data.