Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

The Minimax Complexity of Distributed Optimization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2109.00534 v1 pith:2TGOUK3S submitted 2021-09-01 math.OC cs.LG

classification math.OCcs.LG
keywords algorithmscommunicationsettingboundsintermittentoptimizationcomplexityconvex
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this thesis, I study the minimax oracle complexity of distributed stochastic optimization. First, I present the "graph oracle model", an extension of the classic oracle complexity framework that can be applied to study distributed optimization algorithms. Next, I describe a general approach to proving optimization lower bounds for arbitrary randomized algorithms (as opposed to more restricted classes of algorithms, e.g., deterministic or "zero-respecting" algorithms), which is used extensively throughout the thesis. For the remainder of the thesis, I focus on the specific case of the "intermittent communication setting", where multiple computing devices work in parallel with limited communication amongst themselves. In this setting, I analyze the theoretical properties of the popular Local Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) algorithm in convex setting, both for homogeneous and heterogeneous objectives. I provide the first guarantees for Local SGD that improve over simple baseline methods, but show that Local SGD is not optimal in general. In pursuit of optimal methods in the intermittent communication setting, I then show matching upper and lower bounds for the intermittent communication setting with homogeneous convex, heterogeneous convex, and homogeneous non-convex objectives. These upper bounds are attained by simple variants of SGD which are therefore optimal. Finally, I discuss several additional assumptions about the objective or more powerful oracles that might be exploitable in order to develop better intermittent communication algorithms with better guarantees than our lower bounds allow.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. What's in a Smoothness Constant? Tighter Rates for Local SGD with Bounded Second-order Heterogeneity

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Local SGD provably improves over Mini-batch SGD under bounded second-order heterogeneity in the general convex setting, with nearly tight upper and lower bounds.

  2. What Makes Local Updates Effective: The Role of Data Heterogeneity and Smoothness

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Under bounded second-order heterogeneity, local updates are shown to achieve faster convergence than mini-batch SGD in several convex and non-convex regimes, with matching lower bounds.

Pith tools