Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Bounds for Learning Lossless Source Coding

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2009.08562 v1 pith:2YL6TLGK submitted 2020-09-18 cs.IT cs.LGmath.IT

Bounds for Learning Lossless Source Coding

classification cs.IT cs.LGmath.IT
keywords coderssourcedatatrainingtypecoderperformancerequired
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper asks a basic question: how much training is required to beat a universal source coder? Traditionally, there have been two types of source coders: fixed, optimum coders such as Huffman coders; and universal source coders, such as Lempel-Ziv The paper considers a third type of source coders: learned coders. These are coders that are trained on data of a particular type, and then used to encode new data of that type. This is a type of coder that has recently become very popular for (lossy) image and video coding. The paper consider two criteria for performance of learned coders: the average performance over training data, and a guaranteed performance over all training except for some error probability $P_e$. In both cases the coders are evaluated with respect to redundancy. The paper considers the IID binary case and binary Markov chains. In both cases it is shown that the amount of training data required is very moderate: to code sequences of length $l$ the amount of training data required to beat a universal source coder is $m=K\frac{l}{\log l}$, where the constant in front depends the case considered.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.