Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 164 references

Modern tidal interaction models for rapid binary population synthesis: II. Binary black hole formation, mergers, and spins

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-26 · grok-4.3

Pith's one-line read Isolated binary evolution with updated tides produces mostly low effective spin black hole mergers for current detectors.

desk verdict The paper's new tidal implementation in COMPAS produces testable low-χ_eff predictions for isolated BBH mergers, but those outputs rest on an unbenchmarked dissipation model whose accuracy for post-mass-transfer stars is unclear. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.23773 v1 pith:2ZUNFJ4K submitted 2026-06-22 astro-ph.HE gr-qc

classification astro-ph.HEgr-qc
keywords binaryblackholestidaldissipationpopulationsynthesiseffectivespingravitationalwavesisolatedevolutionmergerratesdistribution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper updates rapid population synthesis with a new self-consistent treatment of tidal dissipation in binaries. This leads to most first-born black holes having zero spin except in chemically homogeneous evolution cases. Second-born black hole spins vary strongly with tidal efficiency and mass transfer history, and are not always orbitally synchronized before the supernova. High effective spin systems form tighter and merge faster, placing them at higher redshifts where current detectors have limited reach. As a result the observed population today is predicted to show strong bias toward low χ_eff, shifting only when detectors access higher redshifts.

What carries the argument

Self-consistent tidal dissipation implementation that determines spin synchronization efficiency from stellar mass, evolutionary stage, and mass transfer history.

What would settle it

A statistically significant sample of low-redshift merging binary black holes showing substantially more than three percent with χ_eff above 0.5 would contradict the predicted selection bias.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Using the updated tidal model in COMPAS, the intrinsic χ_eff distribution of merging binary black holes from isolated evolution is strongly biased low for present-day detectors, with roughly one third of systems below 0.05 and only about three percent above 0.5; high χ_eff binaries merge at higher redshifts due to smaller separations at black hole formation and shorter coalescence times, so the fraction above 0.5 rises to about fifteen percent once detectors reach those earlier epochs.

Load-bearing premise

The new tidal dissipation model accurately captures efficiency and its dependence on mass transfer history across all relevant stellar masses and evolutionary stages.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents predictions for BBH merger rates and χ_eff distributions from isolated binary evolution using a new self-consistent tidal dissipation implementation in COMPAS. It claims most first-born BHs form with zero spin (except chemically homogeneous evolution cases), second-born BH spins depend significantly on tidal dissipation efficiency and mass-transfer history (not always pre-SN synchronized), high-χ_eff systems preferentially merge at high redshift due to smaller separations and shorter coalescence times, and the intrinsic distribution for current detectors is biased low (∼1/3 with χ_eff < 0.05, ∼3% with χ_eff > 0.5), increasing to ∼15% >0.5 at higher redshifts accessible to future detectors.

Significance. If the tidal model holds, the results would be significant for GW astrophysics by providing falsifiable predictions for the isolated-channel contribution to the observed BBH spin distribution, including its redshift evolution, and by highlighting how tidal interactions after mass transfer shape second-born BH spins.

major comments (2)
  1. [Tidal model section (implementation and results)] The headline χ_eff fractions and redshift-evolution claim rest on the new tidal dissipation implementation. No benchmarks or comparisons against detailed stellar models (e.g., MESA grids spanning the relevant mass range and post-mass-transfer stages) are referenced to validate the efficiency or its dependence on mass-transfer history; this is load-bearing because the abstract states second-born spins “depend significantly on the efficiency of tidal dissipation and mass transfer history.”
  2. [Results on χ_eff distributions] The reported low-χ_eff bias (1/3 systems <0.05) is presented as robust, yet the model includes a free parameter for tidal dissipation efficiency whose variation range and impact on the quoted percentages are not quantified; without this, it is unclear whether the bias is a genuine prediction or an artifact of the chosen efficiency value.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Clarify in the abstract or methods the specific range of tidal dissipation efficiencies explored and whether any observational constraints were used to set it.
  2. [Methods] Add a short table or figure caption explicitly listing the free parameters retained in the new tidal model versus those fixed by the self-consistent treatment.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their insightful comments, which have helped us improve the clarity and robustness of our manuscript. Below we address each major comment in turn, outlining the revisions we intend to make.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The headline χ_eff fractions and redshift-evolution claim rest on the new tidal dissipation implementation. No benchmarks or comparisons against detailed stellar models (e.g., MESA grids spanning the relevant mass range and post-mass-transfer stages) are referenced to validate the efficiency or its dependence on mass-transfer history; this is load-bearing because the abstract states second-born spins “depend significantly on the efficiency of tidal dissipation and mass transfer history.”

    Authors: The tidal dissipation model is introduced and its implementation validated against detailed calculations in the companion paper (Paper I). However, we agree that explicit references to benchmarks, particularly for post-mass-transfer stages relevant to second-born BHs, would strengthen the presentation in this work. In the revised manuscript, we will add a new subsection in the methods that summarizes the validation performed in Paper I, including comparisons to MESA grids where available, and discuss the dependence on mass-transfer history. We will also cite additional literature on tidal synchronization in massive binaries. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The reported low-χ_eff bias (1/3 systems <0.05) is presented as robust, yet the model includes a free parameter for tidal dissipation efficiency whose variation range and impact on the quoted percentages are not quantified; without this, it is unclear whether the bias is a genuine prediction or an artifact of the chosen efficiency value.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the sensitivity to the tidal dissipation efficiency parameter was not fully explored in the submitted version. To address this, we will conduct additional simulations varying the efficiency parameter across its physically motivated range and include these results in a new figure or table in the revised manuscript. This will quantify the impact on the χ_eff distribution fractions and demonstrate the robustness of the reported low-χ_eff bias for the fiducial choice. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; outputs are simulation results from new model, not reductions to inputs

full rationale

The provided abstract and context describe predictions generated by running the COMPAS population synthesis code with a newly implemented tidal dissipation prescription. No equations, fitting procedures, or self-referential definitions are visible that would make the reported χ_eff distribution or merger rates equivalent to the model inputs by construction. The spin outcomes are stated to depend on dissipation efficiency and mass-transfer history, but this is presented as a model consequence rather than a tautology or fitted prediction. No load-bearing self-citation chain or ansatz smuggling is exhibited in the text. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks for the purpose of this circularity analysis.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger is necessarily incomplete. The central claims rest on the accuracy of the new tidal dissipation implementation and on the assumption that the simulated population represents isolated binary evolution.

free parameters (1)
  • tidal dissipation efficiency
    Abstract states that second-born BH spins depend significantly on the efficiency of tidal dissipation, indicating it functions as a key adjustable parameter.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Modern tidal interaction models for rapid binary population synthesis: II. Binary black hole formation, mergers, and spins." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2ZUNFJ4K

@misc{pith2026260623773,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Modern tidal interaction models for rapid binary population synthesis: II. Binary black hole formation, mergers, and spins},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2ZUNFJ4K}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.23773}
}
abstract

We present predictions for the merger rates and effective spin ($\chi_{\rm eff}$) distribution of binary black holes (BBHs) from isolated binary evolution, using a new self-consistent tidal dissipation implementation in the rapid binary population synthesis code COMPAS. Most of the first-born black holes (BHs) in our simulated merging BBHs are formed with zero spins, with the exception of BBHs formed from chemically homogeneous evolution. The spins of the second-born BHs with the new model depend significantly on the efficiency of tidal dissipation and mass transfer history, and crucially, are not always consistent with pre-supernova synchronization. High-$\chi_{\rm eff}$ binaries preferentially merge at high redshift due to smaller binary separations at BBH formation and shorter coalescence times, thus rendering them largely inaccessible to current gravitational wave (GW) detectors. We expect the intrinsic spin distribution of merging BBHs formed from isolated evolution to be strongly biased toward low $\chi_{\rm eff}$ with current detectors, with a third of systems having $\chi_{\rm eff} < 0.05$ and only $\sim 3\%$ with $\chi_{\rm eff}>0.5$. However, $\chi_{\rm eff}$ will increase as GW detectors become sensitive to higher redshift sources, with up to $\sim 15\%$ of systems having $\chi_{\rm eff}>0.5$.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.23773 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Yield of BBH formations and mergers, normal￾ized to total star forming mass, across the three tidal pre￾scriptions considered in this work. This figure integrates over the log-uniform distribution of simulated metallicities. For each tidal dissipation model considered in this work, we obtain BBH samples across a range of masses, separations, and metallicities. To determine potential GW sources, we select only binari… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Yield of BBHs that merge within 13.8 Gyr by for￾mation scenario, integrated over the log-uniform distribution of simulated metallicities, across the three tidal prescriptions considered in this work. In the broad context of binary evolution, we can think of our three simulations as representing choices on a con￾tinuous axis of tidal dissipation effectiveness, going from weakest (LEGACY) to strongest (PERFECT) tides.… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Evolution of a BBH progenitor that goes through common envelope with both KAPIL26 (left) and PERFECT (right) tides. The initial parameters in both cases are M1,ZAMS = 26.7M⊙, M2,ZAMS = 24.1M⊙, aZAMS = 502.5R⊙, eZAMS = 0.04, and ZZAMS = 0.0002. The important episodes shown here are: ZAMS, SMT initiated by the primary (SMT1), primary supernova (SN1), common envelope initiated by the secondary (CE2), secondary supernov… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (13 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Evolution of a BBH progenitor that goes through only SMT with both KAPIL26 (left) and PERFECT (right) tides. The initial parameters in both cases are M1,ZAMS = 36.6M⊙, M2,ZAMS = 23.6M⊙, aZAMS = 70.2R⊙, eZAMS = 0.351, and ZZAMS = 0.0005. The important episodes shown her…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Dimensionless BH spin distributions of the pri￾mary (defined as the more massive component at ZAMS) and secondary (defined as the less massive component at ZAMS), across the three simulated populations. The simulations rep￾resent a log-uniform initial stellar metallici…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Dimensionless BH spin distributions of the more massive (top panel) and less massive (bottom panel) BH components across the three simulated populations. The simulations represent a log-uniform initial stellar metallic￾ity distribution, and are not weighted to represen…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Dimensionless secondary BH spins (with sec￾ondary defined as the less massive component at ZAMS) vs. orbital period prior to secondary SN (note reversed axes), for the BBHs that merge within 13.8 Gyr as obtained with the LEGACY (top), KAPIL26 (middle), and PERFECT (bot…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Dimensionless BH spin distributions of the pri￾mary (defined as the more massive ZAMS star) (top panel) and secondary (bottom panel) for the merging BBHs across the three tidal models. The spin distributions are weighted by the appropriate metallicity-specific star for…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: χeff probability distributions of BBH mergers with the LEGACY (left), KAPIL26 (center) and PERFECT (right) tides models, broken into sub-populations corresponding to CE, SMT, and CHE formation channels. 6.1. 1D Spin Distributions We show the expected intrinsic componen…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: For the KAPIL26 population only: total BBH mass (MBH,tot = M1 +M2) vs. mass ratio (q = M2/M1) vs. effective spin (χeff ) for BBHs. q > 1 indicates that the binary experienced mass ratio reversal. All the BBHs merge within 13.8 Gyr of ZAMS formation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:f…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: For the KAPIL26 population only: effective spin (χeff ) vs. coalescence time (tcoal) for all BBHs that merge within 13.8 Gyr. 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 eff 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 P ( e ff ) z=0 z=1 z=2 z=5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The distributions of χeff for binaries at sev￾eral merger redshifts in the KAPIL26 simulation; all binaries merging at that redshift are included, weighted by their re￾spective merger rates, without accounting for observational selection effects. All distributions are…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Left panel: the distribution of χeff among detectable BBHs from the KAPIL26 population, assuming a typical O4-like sensitivity and the assumption that perfect detectors can detect all mergers in the visible Universe. Right panel: the distributions of χeff among detect…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Dimensionless BH spin distributions for the primary component at ZAMS (top panel) and the secondary component at ZAMS (bottom panel). The default KAPIL26 distribution is shown in blue, and spins obtained by using the S. S. Bavera et al. (2021a) fit on the same populat…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: χeff distributions for the merging BBHs with the KAPIL26 population using the fiducial tidal model (blue), and using the S. S. Bavera et al. (2021a) fit (purple) to de￾termine spin magnitudes. A. BAVERA ET AL. (2021) SPIN MAGNITUDES The spin magnitudes of BHs followin…
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: χeff probability distributions of merging BBHs with the KAPIL26 (left) and Z77 (right) tides models, split by the CE, SMT, and CHE formation scenarios. The distributions are weighted to reflect the metallicity-specific star formation history of the Universe as per Sec…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

164 extracted references · 153 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Evidence for additional structure in the effective spin distribution hints at multiple formation pathways in GWTC-5.0

    Alvarez-Lopez, Sofia and Heinzel, Jack and Vitale, Salvatore. Evidence for additional structure in the effective spin distribution hints at multiple formation pathways in GWTC-5.0. 2026. arXiv:2606.12205

  2. [2]

    Abac, A. G. and others. GWTC-5.0: Population Properties of Merging Compact Binaries. 2026. arXiv:2605.27226

  3. [3]

    Abac, A. G. and others. GWTC-5.0: Observations from the Second Part of the Fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Observing Run and Updates to the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog. 2026. arXiv:2605.27225

  4. [4]

    and Broekgaarden, Floor S

    Vigna-G\'omez, Alejandro and MacLeod, Morgan and Neijssel, Coenraad J. and Broekgaarden, Floor S. and Justham, Stephen and Howitt, George and de Mink, Selma E. and Vinciguerra, Serena and Mandel, Ilya. Common-Envelope Episodes that lead to Double Neutron Star formation. Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust. 2020. doi:10.1017/pasa.2020.31. arXiv:2001.09829

  5. [5]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Vick, Michelle and Lai, Dong , title = ". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2020 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1784 , url =

  6. [6]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Vick, Michelle and Lai, Dong , title = ". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2018 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty225 , url =

  7. [7]

    F., Percival , W

    Hurley, Jarrod R. and Tout, Christopher A. and Pols, Onno R. Evolution of binary stars and the effect of tides on binary populations. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2002. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05038.x. arXiv:astro-ph/0201220

  8. [8]

    , volume =

    Tidal evolution in close binary systems. , volume =. Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =. 1981 , pages =

Show all 164 references
  1. [9]

    , volume =

    Tidal friction in close binary systems. , volume =. Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =. 1977 , pages =

  2. [10]

    Flipping spins in mass transferring binaries and origin of spin-orbit misalignment in binary black holes

    Stegmann, Jakob and Antonini, Fabio. Flipping spins in mass transferring binaries and origin of spin-orbit misalignment in binary black holes. Phys. Rev. D. 2021. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.063007. arXiv:2012.06329

  3. [11]

    Dynamical Formation of Close Binaries During the Pre-main-sequence Phase

    Moe, Maxwell and Kratter, Kaitlin M. Dynamical Formation of Close Binaries During the Pre-main-sequence Phase. Astrophys. J. 2018. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaa6d2. arXiv:1706.09894

  4. [12]

    The Role of Chaos in the Circularization of Tidal Capture Binaries. I. The Chaos Boundary. Astrophys. J. doi:10.1086/176178 , adsurl =

  5. [13]

    and Taam, Ronald E

    Belczynski, Krzystof and Kalogera, Vassiliki and Rasio, Frederic A. and Taam, Ronald E. and Zezas, Andreas and Bulik, Tomasz and Maccarone, Thomas J. and Ivanova, Natalia. Compact object modeling with the startrack population synthesis code. Astrophys. J. Supp. S. 2008. doi:10...

  6. [14]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics, vol

    Stability of tidal equilibrium , author=. Astronomy and Astrophysics, vol. 92, no. 1-2, Dec. 1980, p. 167-170. , volume=

  7. [15]

    Song, H. F. and Meynet, G. and Maeder, A. and Ekstr. Close binary evolution -. Astronomy & Astrophysics , language =. 2018 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731073 , issn =

  8. [16]

    and Fragos, T

    Qin, Y. and Fragos, T. and Meynet, G. and Andrews, J. and S rensen, M. and Song, H. F. The spin of the second-born black hole in coalescing binary black holes. Astron. Astrophys. 2018. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201832839. arXiv:1802.05738

  9. [17]

    and Langer, Norbert

    Yoon, Sung-Chul and Woosley, Stan E. and Langer, Norbert. Type Ib/c supernovae in binary systems I. Evolution and properties of the progenitor stars. Astrophys. J. 2010. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/725/1/940. arXiv:1004.0843

  10. [18]

    Astrophys

    On formation of close binaries by two-body tidal capture. Astrophys. J. doi:10.1086/155143 , adsurl =

  11. [19]

    om, Sylvia and Eggenberger, Patrick and Meynet, Georges and Fragos, Tassos and Song, Han Feng , title =

    Sciarini, Luca and Ekstr\"om, Sylvia and Eggenberger, Patrick and Meynet, Georges and Fragos, Tassos and Song, Han Feng , title = ". Astron. Astrophys. 2024. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348424. arXiv:2312.08437

  12. [20]

    Chaotic dynamics of wide triples induced by galactic tides: a novel channel for producing compact binaries, mergers, and collisions

    Grishin, Evgeni and Perets, Hagai B. Chaotic dynamics of wide triples induced by galactic tides: a novel channel for producing compact binaries, mergers, and collisions. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2022. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac706. arXiv:2112.11475

  13. [21]

    Rasio, F. A. and Tout, C. A. and Lubow, S. H. and Livio, M. Tidal decay of close planetary orbits. Astrophys. J. 1996. doi:10.1086/177941. arXiv:astro-ph/9605059

  14. [22]

    Preece and Adrian S

    Holly P. Preece and Adrian S. Hamers and Patrick G. Neunteufel and Adam L. Schaefer and Christopher A. Tout , doi =. The Equilibrium Tide: An Updated Prescription for Population Synthesis Codes , url =. The Astrophysical Journal , month =. 2022 , bdsk-url-1 =

  15. [23]

    and Kiseleva, Ludmila G

    Eggleton, Peter P. and Kiseleva, Ludmila G. and Hut, Piet. The Equilibrium tide model for tidal friction. Astrophys. J. 1998. doi:10.1086/305670. arXiv:astro-ph/9801246

  16. [24]

    and Waldman, Roni , title = "

    Kushnir, Doron and Zaldarriaga, Matias and Kollmeier, Juna A. and Waldman, Roni , title = ". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2017 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx255 , url =

  17. [25]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202040174 , journal =

    Dynamical tide in stellar radiative zones - General formalism and evolution for low-mass stars , url =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202040174 , journal =

  18. [26]

    Tidal dissipation in stars and giant planets

    Ogilvie, Gordon I. Tidal dissipation in stars and giant planets. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2014. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-035941. arXiv:1406.2207

  19. [27]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =

    Tidal dissipation in evolving low-mass and solar-type stars with predictions for planetary orbital decay. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2405 , archivePrefix =. 2008.03262 , primaryClass =

  20. [28]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Duguid, Craig D and Barker, Adrian J and Jones, C A , title = ". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2020 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2216 , url =

  21. [29]

    and Pols, Onno R

    Hurley, Jarrod R. and Pols, Onno R. and Tout, Christopher A. Comprehensive analytic formulae for stellar evolution as a function of mass and metallicity. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2000. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03426.x. arXiv:astro-ph/0001295

  22. [30]

    Fits for the convective envelope mass in massive stars

    Picker, Lewis and Hirai, Ryosuke and Mandel, Ilya. Fits for the convective envelope mass in massive stars. 2024. arXiv:2402.13180

  23. [31]

    Tides in rotating barotropic fluid bodies: the contribution of inertial waves and the role of internal structure

    Ogilvie, Gordon I. Tides in rotating barotropic fluid bodies: the contribution of inertial waves and the role of internal structure. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2013. doi:10.1093/mnras/sts362. arXiv:1211.0837

  24. [32]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics , keywords =

    The dynamical tide in close binaries. Astronomy and Astrophysics , keywords =

  25. [33]

    Calibration of Equilibrium Tide Theory for Extrasolar Planet Systems

    Hansen, Brad. Calibration of Equilibrium Tide Theory for Extrasolar Planet Systems. Astrophys. J. 2010. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/723/1/285. arXiv:1009.3027

  26. [34]

    2024 , eprint=

    Rotational synchronisation of B-type binaries in 30 Doradus , author=. 2024 , eprint=

  27. [35]

    Love, A. E. H. , title = ". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 1909 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/69.6.476 , url =

  28. [36]

    and Stassun, Keivan G

    Dhital, Saurav and West, Andrew A. and Stassun, Keivan G. and Bochanski, John J. Sloan Low-Mass Wide Pairs of Kinematically Equivalent Stars (SLoWPoKES): A Catalog of Very Wide, Low-mass Pairs. Astron. J. 2010. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/139/6/2566. arXiv:1004.2755

  29. [37]

    and others

    York, Donald G. and others. The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical Summary. Astron. J. 2000. doi:10.1086/301513. arXiv:astro-ph/0006396

  30. [38]

    and others

    Abazajian, Kevork N. and others. The Seventh Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Astrophys. J. Supp. S. 2009. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/182/2/543. arXiv:0812.0649

  31. [39]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Hwang, Hsiang-Chih and Ting, Yuan-Sen and Zakamska, Nadia L , title = ". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2022 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac675 , url =

  32. [40]

    10.1051/0004-6361/202244144

    Combining HIPPARCOS and Gaia data for the study of binaries: The BINARYS tool , DOI= "10.1051/0004-6361/202244144", url= "https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202244144", journal =

  33. [41]

    Perryman, M. A. C. and others. The Hipparcos catalogue. Astron. Astrophys. 1997

  34. [42]

    10.1051/0004-6361/202243782

    Gaia Data Release 3 - Stellar multiplicity, a teaser for the hidden treasure , DOI= "10.1051/0004-6361/202243782", url= "https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202243782", journal =

  35. [43]

    Mathieu , title =

    Søren Meibom and Robert D. Mathieu , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2005 , month =. doi:10.1086/427082 , url =

  36. [44]

    J. J. Zanazzi , title =. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , abstract =. 2022 , month =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac6516 , url =

  37. [45]

    and Mayor, M

    Duquennoy, A. and Mayor, M. Multiplicity among solar - type stars in the solar neighbourhood. 2. Distribution of the orbital elements in an unbiased sample. Astron. Astrophys. 1991

  38. [46]

    Peacock, J. A. , title = ". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 1983 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/202.3.615 , url =

  39. [47]

    E. M. Leiner and R. D. Mathieu and N. M. Gosnell and A. M. Geller , title =. The Astronomical Journal , abstract =. 2015 , month =. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/150/1/10 , url =

  40. [48]

    Statistical view of orbital circularisation with 14 000 characterised TESS eclipsing binaries

  41. [49]

    10.1051/0004-6361/201833816

    Orbital properties of binary post-AGB stars , DOI= "10.1051/0004-6361/201833816", url= "https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833816", journal =

  42. [50]

    Behr and Andrew T

    Bradford B. Behr and Andrew T. Cenko and Arsen R. Hajian and Robert S. McMillan and Marc Murison and Jeff Meade and Robert Hindsley , title =. The Astronomical Journal , abstract =. 2011 , month =. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/142/1/6 , url =

  43. [51]

    Vitesses radiales et

    Prevot, L , journal=. Vitesses radiales et

  44. [52]

    10.1051/aas:2000237

    Resolved double-lined spectroscopic binaries: A neglected source of hypothesis-free parallaxes and stellar masses , DOI= "10.1051/aas:2000237", url= "https://doi.org/10.1051/aas:2000237", journal =

  45. [53]

    Evolution of the Convective Core Mass during the Main Sequence

    Shikauchi, Minori and Hirai, Ryosuke and Mandel, Ilya. Evolution of the Convective Core Mass during the Main Sequence. 2024. arXiv:2409.00460

  46. [54]

    and Fragos, Tassos and Qin, Ying and Zapartas, Emmanouil and Neijssel, Coenraad J

    Bavera, Simone S. and Fragos, Tassos and Qin, Ying and Zapartas, Emmanouil and Neijssel, Coenraad J. and Mandel, Ilya and Batta, Aldo and Gaebel, Sebastian M. and Kimball, Chase and Stevenson, Simon. The origin of spin in binary black holes: Predicting the distributions of the...

  47. [55]

    and Bulik, Tomasz and Pannarale, Francesco

    Dominik, Michal and Berti, Emanuele and O'Shaughnessy, Richard and Mandel, Ilya and Belczynski, Krzysztof and Fryer, Christopher and Holz, Daniel E. and Bulik, Tomasz and Pannarale, Francesco. Double Compact Objects III: Gravitational Wave Detection Rates. Astrophys. J. 2015. ...

  48. [56]

    Gallegos-Garcia, Monica and Berry, Christopher P. L. and Marchant, Pablo and Kalogera, Vicky. Binary Black Hole Formation with Detailed Modeling: Stable Mass Transfer Leads to Lower Merger Rates. Astrophys. J. 2021. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac2610. arXiv:2107.05702

  49. [57]

    and others

    Bavera, Simone S. and others. Probing the progenitors of spinning binary black-hole mergers with long gamma-ray bursts. Astron. Astrophys. 2022. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141979. arXiv:2106.15841

  50. [58]

    On the variation of the initial mass function

    Kroupa, Pavel. On the variation of the initial mass function. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2001. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x. arXiv:astro-ph/0009005

  51. [59]

    and de Mink, S

    Sana, H. and de Mink, S. E. and de Koter, A. and Langer, N. and Evans, C. J. and Gieles, M. and Gosset, E. and Izzard, R. G. and Bouquin, J. -B. Le and Schneider, F. R. N. Binary interaction dominates the evolution of massive stars. Science. 2012. doi:10.1126/science.1223344. ...

  52. [60]

    Tidal Spin-up of Black Hole Progenitor Stars

    Ma, Linhao and Fuller, Jim. Tidal Spin-up of Black Hole Progenitor Stars. Astrophys. J. 2023. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acdb74. arXiv:2305.08356

  53. [61]

    Most Black Holes are Born Very Slowly Rotating

    Fuller, Jim and Ma, Linhao. Most Black Holes are Born Very Slowly Rotating. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2019. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab339b. arXiv:1907.03714

  54. [62]

    and Langer, N

    Heger, A. and Langer, N. and Woosley, S. E. Presupernova evolution of rotating massive stars. 1. Numerical method and evolution of the internal stellar structure. Astrophys. J. 2000. doi:10.1086/308158. arXiv:astro-ph/9904132

  55. [63]

    Spruit, H. C. Differential rotation and magnetic fields in stellar interiors. Astron. Astrophys. 1999. arXiv:astro-ph/9907138

  56. [64]

    Supernova Fallback as Origin of Neutron Star Spins and Spin-kick Alignment

    Janka, Hans-Thomas and Wongwathanarat, Annop and Kramer, Michael. Supernova Fallback as Origin of Neutron Star Spins and Spin-kick Alignment. Astrophys. J. 2022. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac403c. arXiv:2104.07493

  57. [65]

    Inferences about supernova physics from gravitational-wave measurements: GW151226 spin misalignment as an indicator of strong black-hole natal kicks

    O'Shaughnessy, Richard and Gerosa, Davide and Wysocki, Daniel. Inferences about supernova physics from gravitational-wave measurements: GW151226 spin misalignment as an indicator of strong black-hole natal kicks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.011101. arXiv...

  58. [66]

    Spin orbit misalignment in close binaries with two compact objects

    Kalogera, Vassiliki. Spin orbit misalignment in close binaries with two compact objects. Astrophys. J. 2000. doi:10.1086/309400. arXiv:astro-ph/9911417

  59. [67]

    Revising the Spin and Kick Connection in Isolated Binary Black Holes

    Baibhav, Vishal and Kalogera, Vicky. Revising the Spin and Kick Connection in Isolated Binary Black Holes. 2024. arXiv:2412.03461

  60. [68]

    and Waldman, Roni

    Kushnir, Doron and Zaldarriaga, Matias and Kollmeier, Juna A. and Waldman, Roni. GW150914: Spin based constraints on the merger time of the progenitor system. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2016. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1684. arXiv:1605.03839

  61. [69]

    An upper limit on the spins of merging binary black holes formed through isolated binary evolution

    Marchant, Pablo and Podsiadlowski, Philipp and Mandel, Ilya. An upper limit on the spins of merging binary black holes formed through isolated binary evolution. Astron. Astrophys. 2024. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348190. arXiv:2311.14041

  62. [70]

    uller, Bernhard , title =

    Mandel, Ilya and M\"uller, Bernhard , title = ". Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2020. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3043. arXiv:2006.08360

  63. [71]

    uller, Bernhard , title =

    Kapil, Veome and Mandel, Ilya and Berti, Emanuele and M\"uller, Bernhard , title = ". Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2023. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad019. arXiv:2209.09252

  64. [72]

    and Stevenson, Simon and Thrane, Eric

    Broekgaarden, Floor S. and Stevenson, Simon and Thrane, Eric. Signatures of Mass Ratio Reversal in Gravitational Waves from Merging Binary Black Holes. Astrophys. J. 2022. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8879. arXiv:2205.01693

  65. [73]

    Astrophys

    Double white dwarfs as progenitors of R Coronae Borealis stars and type I supernovae. Astrophys. J. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/161701 , adsurl =

  66. [74]

    Astrophys

    Common Envelope Evolution and Double Cores of Planetary Nebulae. Astrophys. J. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/168974 , adsurl =

  67. [75]

    On the Binding Energy Parameter of Common Envelope Evolution

    Xu, Xiao-Jie and Li, Xiang-Dong. On the Binding Energy Parameter of Common Envelope Evolution. Astrophys. J. 2010. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/716/1/114. arXiv:1004.4957

  68. [76]

    Chemically homogeneous evolution: a rapid population synthesis approach

    Riley, Jeff and Mandel, Ilya and Marchant, Pablo and Butler, Ellen and Nathaniel, Kaila and Neijssel, Coenraad and Shortt, Spencer and Vigna-Gomez, Alejandro. Chemically homogeneous evolution: a rapid population synthesis approach. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2021. doi:10.1093/m...

  69. [77]

    de Mink, S. E. and Cantiello, M. and Langer, N. and Pols, O. R. Chemically homogeneous evolution in massive binaries. AIP Conf. Proc. 2010. doi:10.1063/1.3536387. arXiv:1010.2177

  70. [78]

    Merging binary black holes formed through chemically homogeneous evolution in short-period stellar binaries

    Mandel, Ilya and de Mink, Selma E. Merging binary black holes formed through chemically homogeneous evolution in short-period stellar binaries. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2016. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw379. arXiv:1601.00007

  71. [79]

    Abbott, B. P. and others. GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs. Phys. Rev. X. 2019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.9.031040. arXiv:1811.12907

  72. [80]

    and others

    Abbott, R. and others. GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run. Phys. Rev. X. 2021. doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.11.021053. arXiv:2010.14527

  73. [81]

    and others

    Abbott, R. and others. GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run. Phys. Rev. X. 2023. doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.13.041039. arXiv:2111.03606

  74. [82]

    and Fishbach, Maya and Zevin, Michael and Zapartas, Emmanouil and Fragos, Tassos

    Bavera, Simone S. and Fishbach, Maya and Zevin, Michael and Zapartas, Emmanouil and Fragos, Tassos. The eff - z correlation of field binary black hole mergers and how 3G gravitational-wave detectors can constrain it. Astron. Astrophys. 2022. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243724. ar...

  75. [83]

    and Zevin, Michael and Fragos, Tassos

    Bavera, Simone S. and Zevin, Michael and Fragos, Tassos. Approximations to the spin of close Black-hole-Wolf-Rayet binaries. 2021. arXiv:2105.09077

  76. [84]

    and Miller, Simona J

    Callister, Thomas A. and Miller, Simona J. and Chatziioannou, Katerina and Farr, Will M. No Evidence that the Majority of Black Holes in Binaries Have Zero Spin. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2022. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac847e. arXiv:2205.08574

  77. [85]

    and others

    Abbott, R. and others. Population of Merging Compact Binaries Inferred Using Gravitational Waves through GWTC-3. Phys. Rev. X. 2023. doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.13.011048. arXiv:2111.03634

  78. [86]

    and others

    Punturo, M. and others. The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory. Class. Quantum Grav. 2010. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/27/19/194002

  79. [87]

    Cosmic Explorer: The U.S

    Reitze, David and others. Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO. Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 2019. arXiv:1907.04833

  80. [88]

    The expected spins of gravitational wave sources with isolated field binary progenitors

    Zaldarriaga, Matias and Kushnir, Doron and Kollmeier, Juna A. The expected spins of gravitational wave sources with isolated field binary progenitors. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2018. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2577. arXiv:1702.00885

  81. [90]

    Astrophys

    Rapid Stellar and Binary Population Synthesis with COMPAS. Astrophys. J. Supp. S. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac416c , archivePrefix =. 2109.10352 , primaryClass =

  82. [92]

    On the Origin of Black-Hole Spin in High-Mass X-ray Binaries

    Qin, Ying and Marchant, Pablo and Fragos, Tassos and Meynet, Georges and Kalogera, Vicky. On the Origin of Black-Hole Spin in High-Mass X-ray Binaries. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2019. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaf97b. arXiv:1810.13016

  83. [93]

    The Progenitor stars of gamma-ray bursts

    Woosley, Stan and Heger, Alexander. The Progenitor stars of gamma-ray bursts. Astrophys. J. 2006. doi:10.1086/498500. arXiv:astro-ph/0508175

  84. [94]

    The Origin of Black Hole Spin in Galactic Low-Mass X-ray Binaries

    Fragos, Tassos and McClintock, Jeffrey E. The Origin of Black Hole Spin in Galactic Low-Mass X-ray Binaries. Astrophys. J. 2015. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/800/1/17. arXiv:1408.2661

  85. [95]

    Astrophys

    Mind Your Ps and Qs: The Interrelation between Period (P) and Mass-ratio (Q) Distributions of Binary Stars. Astrophys. J. Supp. S. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aa6fb6 , archivePrefix =. 1606.05347 , primaryClass =

  86. [96]

    Astrophys

    A Survey of Stellar Families: Multiplicity of Solar-type Stars. Astrophys. J. Supp. S. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/190/1/1 , archivePrefix =. 1007.0414 , primaryClass =

  87. [97]

    On the origin of the O- and B-type stars with high velocities (the ``run-away'' stars), and some related problems. B. Astron. I. Neth. , year = 1961, month = may, volume =

  88. [98]

    Brandt, W. N. and Podsiadlowski, Ph. The Effects of High-Velocity Supernova Kicks on the Orbital Properties and Sky Distributions of Neutron Star Binaries. 1994. arXiv:astro-ph/9412023

  89. [99]

    de Mink, S. E. and Belczynski, K. Merger rates of double neutron stars and stellar origin black holes: The Impact of Initial Conditions on Binary Evolution Predictions. Astrophys. J. 2015. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/814/1/58. arXiv:1506.03573

  90. [100]

    Suspicious Siblings: The Distribution of Mass and Spin across Component Black Holes in Isolated Binary Evolution

    Zevin, Michael and Bavera, Simone S. Suspicious Siblings: The Distribution of Mass and Spin across Component Black Holes in Isolated Binary Evolution. Astrophys. J. 2022. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac6f5d. arXiv:2203.02515

  91. [101]

    Nonparametric analysis of correlations in the binary black hole population with LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA data

    Heinzel, Jack and Mould, Matthew and Vitale, Salvatore. Nonparametric analysis of correlations in the binary black hole population with LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA data. Phys. Rev. D. 2025. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.L061305. arXiv:2406.16844

  92. [102]

    The Lives and Death-Throes of Massive Stars , year = 2017, editor =

    The multiplicity of massive stars: a 2016 view. The Lives and Death-Throes of Massive Stars , year = 2017, editor =. doi:10.1017/S1743921317003209 , archivePrefix =. 1703.01608 , primaryClass =

  93. [103]

    Modern Tidal Interaction Models for Rapid Binary Population Synthesis

    Kapil, Veome and Mandel, Ilya and Grishin, Evgeni and Fuller, Jim and Riley, Jeff and Berti, Emanuele. Modern Tidal Interaction Models for Rapid Binary Population Synthesis. I. Methods. Astrophys. J. 2026. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae5e48. arXiv:2602.10187

  94. [105]

    Accretion Feedback from newly-formed black holes and its implications for LIGO Sources

    Batta, Aldo and Ramirez-Ruiz, Enrico. Accretion Feedback from newly-formed black holes and its implications for LIGO Sources. 2019. arXiv:1904.04835

  95. [106]

    and Hu, R

    Qin, Y. and Hu, R. -C. and Meynet, G. and Wang, Y. Z. and Zhu, J. -P. and Song, H. F. and Shu, X. W. and Wu, S. C. Merging binary black holes formed through double-core evolution. Astron. Astrophys. 2023. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244712. arXiv:2301.04918

  96. [107]

    Abac, A. G. and others. GWTC-4.0: Updating the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog with Observations from the First Part of the Fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Observing Run. 2025. arXiv:2508.18082

  97. [108]

    Abac, A. G. and others. GWTC-4.0: Population Properties of Merging Compact Binaries. 2025. arXiv:2508.18083

  98. [109]

    Signatures of spin precession and nutation in isolated black-hole binaries

    Steinle, Nathan and Kesden, Michael. Signatures of spin precession and nutation in isolated black-hole binaries. Phys. Rev. D. 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.063028. arXiv:2206.00391

  99. [110]

    On the effective spin-mass ratio relation of binary black hole mergers that evolved in isolation

    Banerjee, Sambaran and Olejak, Aleksandra. On the effective spin-mass ratio relation of binary black hole mergers that evolved in isolation. 2024. arXiv:2411.15112

  100. [111]

    and Neijssel, Coenraad J

    Stevenson, Simon and Vigna-G \'o mez, Alejandro and Mandel, Ilya and Barrett, Jim W. and Neijssel, Coenraad J. and Perkins, David and de Mink, Selma E. Formation of the first three gravitational-wave observations through isolated binary evolution. Nature Commun. 2017. doi:10.1...

  101. [112]

    On the formation history of Galactic double neutron stars

    Vigna-G \'o mez, Alejandro and others. On the formation history of Galactic double neutron stars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2018. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2463. arXiv:1805.07974

  102. [113]

    Rapid Stellar and Binary Population Synthesis with COMPAS: Methods Paper II

    Mandel, Ilya and others. Rapid Stellar and Binary Population Synthesis with COMPAS: Methods Paper II. Astrophys. J. Supp. S. 2025. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/adf8d0. arXiv:2506.02316

  103. [114]

    Double Compact Objects I: The Significance of the Common Envelope on Merger Rates

    Dominik, Michal and Belczynski, Krzysztof and Fryer, Christopher and Holz, Daniel and Berti, Emanuele and Bulik, Tomasz and Mandel, Ilya and O'Shaughnessy, Richard. Double Compact Objects I: The Significance of the Common Envelope on Merger Rates. Astrophys. J. 2012. doi:10.10...

  104. [115]

    and others

    Broekgaarden, Floor S. and others. Impact of massive binary star and cosmic evolution on gravitational wave observations II. Double compact object rates and properties. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2022. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1677. arXiv:2112.05763

  105. [116]

    Merging stellar-mass binary black holes

    Mandel, Ilya and Farmer, Alison. Merging stellar-mass binary black holes. Phys. Rep. 2022. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2022.01.003. arXiv:1806.05820

  106. [117]

    Unequal-mass, highly-spinning binary black hole mergers in the stable mass transfer formation channel

    Olejak, Aleksandra and Klencki, Jakub and Xu, Xiao-Tian and Wang, Chen and Belczynski, Krzysztof and Lasota, Jean-Pierre. Unequal-mass, highly-spinning binary black hole mergers in the stable mass transfer formation channel. Astron. Astrophys. 2024. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/20245...

  107. [118]

    Wolf Rayet compact object binaries as progenitors of binary compact objects

    Korb, Erika and Mapelli, Michela and Iorio, Giuliano and Costa, Guglielmo and Dall'Amico, Marco. Wolf Rayet compact object binaries as progenitors of binary compact objects. Astron. Astrophys. 2025. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452585. arXiv:2410.08965

  108. [119]

    Tidal Dissipation in Planet-Hosting Stars: Damping of Spin-Orbit Misalignment and Survival of Hot Jupiters

    Lai, Dong. Tidal Dissipation in Planet-Hosting Stars: Damping of Spin-Orbit Misalignment and Survival of Hot Jupiters. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2012. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20893.x. arXiv:1109.4703

  109. [120]

    Evolution of binary black hole spacetimes

    Pretorius, Frans. Evolution of binary black hole spacetimes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.121101. arXiv:gr-qc/0507014

  110. [121]

    Cosmological black hole spin evolution by mergers and accretion

    Berti, Emanuele and Volonteri, Marta. Cosmological black hole spin evolution by mergers and accretion. Astrophys. J. 2008. doi:10.1086/590379. arXiv:0802.0025

  111. [122]

    Are merging black holes born from stellar collapse or previous mergers?

    Gerosa, Davide and Berti, Emanuele. Are merging black holes born from stellar collapse or previous mergers?. Phys. Rev. D. 2017. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.124046. arXiv:1703.06223

  112. [123]

    and Zevin, Michael and Amaro-Seoane, Pau and Chatterjee, Sourav and Kremer, Kyle and Rasio, Frederic A

    Rodriguez, Carl L. and Zevin, Michael and Amaro-Seoane, Pau and Chatterjee, Sourav and Kremer, Kyle and Rasio, Frederic A. and Ye, Claire S. Black holes: The next generation repeated mergers in dense star clusters and their gravitational-wave properties. Phys. Rev. D. 2019. do...

  113. [124]

    Signatures of hierarchical mergers in black hole spin and mass distribution

    Tagawa, Hiromichi and Haiman, Zolt \'a n and Bartos, Imre and Kocsis, Bence and Omukai, Kazuyuki. Signatures of hierarchical mergers in black hole spin and mass distribution. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2021. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2315. arXiv:2104.09510

  114. [125]

    Hierarchical mergers of stellar-mass black holes and their gravitational-wave signatures

    Gerosa, Davide and Fishbach, Maya. Hierarchical mergers of stellar-mass black holes and their gravitational-wave signatures. Nat. Astron. 2021. doi:10.1038/s41550-021-01398-w. arXiv:2105.03439

  115. [126]

    The Implications of High BH Spins on the Origin of BH BH Mergers

    Olejak, Aleksandra and Belczynski, Krzysztof. The Implications of High BH Spins on the Origin of BH BH Mergers. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2021. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac2f48. arXiv:2109.06872

  116. [127]

    van Son, L. A. C. and de Mink, S. E. and Callister, T. and Justham, S. and Renzo, M. and Wagg, T. and Broekgaarden, F. S. and Kummer, F. and Pakmor, R. and Mandel, I. The Redshift Evolution of the Binary Black Hole Merger Rate: A Weighty Matter. Astrophys. J. 2022. doi:10.3847...

  117. [128]

    and Farr, Will M

    Callister, Thomas A. and Farr, Will M. Parameter-Free Tour of the Binary Black Hole Population. Phys. Rev. X. 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.14.021005. arXiv:2302.07289

  118. [129]

    Cover Your Basis: Comprehensive Data-driven Characterization of the Binary Black Hole Population

    Edelman, Bruce and Farr, Ben and Doctor, Zoheyr. Cover Your Basis: Comprehensive Data-driven Characterization of the Binary Black Hole Population. Astrophys. J. 2023. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acb5ed. arXiv:2210.12834

  119. [130]

    The Emergence of Structure in the Binary Black Hole Mass Distribution

    Tiwari, Vaibhav and Fairhurst, Stephen. The Emergence of Structure in the Binary Black Hole Mass Distribution. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2021. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abfbe7. arXiv:2011.04502

  120. [131]

    GWFAST: A Fisher Information Matrix Python Code for Third-generation Gravitational-wave Detectors

    Iacovelli, Francesco and Mancarella, Michele and Foffa, Stefano and Maggiore, Michele. GWFAST: A Fisher Information Matrix Python Code for Third-generation Gravitational-wave Detectors. Astrophys. J. Supp. 2022. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac9129. arXiv:2207.06910

  121. [132]

    Forecasting the Detection Capabilities of Third-generation Gravitational-wave Detectors Using GWFAST

    Iacovelli, Francesco and Mancarella, Michele and Foffa, Stefano and Maggiore, Michele. Forecasting the Detection Capabilities of Third-generation Gravitational-wave Detectors Using GWFAST. Astrophys. J. 2022. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac9cd4. arXiv:2207.02771

  122. [133]

    Abac, A. G. and others. Open Data from LIGO, Virgo, and KAGRA through the First Part of the Fourth Observing Run. 2025. arXiv:2508.18079

  123. [134]

    and Norman, C

    Langer, N. and Norman, C. A. On the collapsar model of long gamma-ray bursts: constraints from cosmic metallicity evolution. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2006. doi:10.1086/500363. arXiv:astro-ph/0512271

  124. [135]

    and Vigna-G \'o mez, Alejandro and Stevenson, Simon and Barrett, Jim W

    Neijssel, Coenraad J. and Vigna-G \'o mez, Alejandro and Stevenson, Simon and Barrett, Jim W. and Gaebel, Sebastian M. and Broekgaarden, Floor and de Mink, Selma E. and Sz \'e csi, Dorottya and Vinciguerra, Serena and Mandel, Ilya. The effect of the metallicity-specific star f...

  125. [136]

    A Horizon Study for Cosmic Explorer: Science, Observatories, and Community

    Evans, Matthew and others. A Horizon Study for Cosmic Explorer: Science, Observatories, and Community. 2021. arXiv:2109.09882

  126. [137]

    The Science of the Einstein Telescope

    Abac, Adrian and others. The Science of the Einstein Telescope. 2025. arXiv:2503.12263

  127. [138]

    and others

    Hild, S. and others. Sensitivity Studies for Third-Generation Gravitational Wave Observatories. Class. Quantum Grav. 2011. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/28/9/094013. arXiv:1012.0908

  128. [139]

    Science Case for the Einstein Telescope

    Maggiore, Michele and others. Science Case for the Einstein Telescope. J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys. 2020. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/03/050. arXiv:1912.02622

  129. [140]

    and others

    Saleem, M. and others. The science case for LIGO-India. Class. Quantum Grav. 2022. doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac3b99. arXiv:2105.01716

  130. [141]

    Prasad, Vaishak and Sathyaprakash, B. S. Are black hole spins truly near-zero?. 2026. arXiv:2602.12859

  131. [142]

    The Critical Role of LIGO-India in the Era of Next-generation Observatories

    Pandey, Shiksha and Gupta, Ish and Chandra, Koustav and Sathyaprakash, Bangalore S. The Critical Role of LIGO-India in the Era of Next-generation Observatories. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2025. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/add15f. arXiv:2411.10349

  132. [143]

    Characterizing gravitational wave detector networks: from A ^ to cosmic explorer

    Gupta, Ish and others. Characterizing gravitational wave detector networks: from A ^ to cosmic explorer. Class. Quantum Grav. 2024. doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ad7b99. arXiv:2307.10421

  133. [144]

    and Pathak, Lalit and Sengupta, Anand S

    Shukla, Sachin R. and Pathak, Lalit and Sengupta, Anand S. Pinpointing coalescing binary neutron star sources with the IGWN, including LIGO-Aundha. Phys. Rev. D. 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.044051. arXiv:2311.15695

  134. [145]

    Spin orientations of merging black holes formed from the evolution of stellar binaries

    Gerosa, Davide and Berti, Emanuele and O'Shaughnessy, Richard and Belczynski, Krzysztof and Kesden, Michael and Wysocki, Daniel and Gladysz, Wojciech. Spin orientations of merging black holes formed from the evolution of stellar binaries. Phys. Rev. D. 2018. doi:10.1103/PhysRe...

  135. [146]

    Distinguishing black-hole spin-orbit resonances by their gravitational-wave signatures

    Gerosa, Davide and O'Shaughnessy, Richard and Kesden, Michael and Berti, Emanuele and Sperhake, Ulrich. Distinguishing black-hole spin-orbit resonances by their gravitational-wave signatures. Phys. Rev. D. 2014. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.124025. arXiv:1403.7147

  136. [147]

    Baibhav, Vishal and Gerosa, Davide and Berti, Emanuele and Wong, Kaze W. K. and Helfer, Thomas and Mould, Matthew. The mass gap, the spin gap, and the origin of merging binary black holes. Phys. Rev. D. 2020. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.043002. arXiv:2004.00650

  137. [148]

    Resonant-plane locking and spin alignment in stellar-mass black-hole binaries: a diagnostic of compact-binary formation

    Gerosa, Davide and Kesden, Michael and Berti, Emanuele and O'Shaughnessy, Richard and Sperhake, Ulrich. Resonant-plane locking and spin alignment in stellar-mass black-hole binaries: a diagnostic of compact-binary formation. Phys. Rev. D. 2013. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.104028. ...

  138. [149]

    and others

    Belczynski, K. and others. Evolutionary roads leading to low effective spins, high black hole masses, and O1/O2 rates for LIGO/Virgo binary black holes. Astron. Astrophys. 2020. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936528. arXiv:1706.07053

  139. [150]

    Explaining LIGO s observations via isolated binary evolution with natal kicks

    Wysocki, Daniel and Gerosa, Davide and O'Shaughnessy, Richard and Belczynski, Krzysztof and Gladysz, Wojciech and Berti, Emanuele and Kesden, Michael and Holz, Daniel E. Explaining LIGO s observations via isolated binary evolution with natal kicks. Phys. Rev. D. 2018. doi:10.1...

  140. [151]

    Detecting regular precession using a new gravitational waveform model directly parameterized by both precession amplitude and frequency

    Singh, Tamanjyot and Stoikos, Evangelos and Ali, Saif and Steinle, Nathan and Kesden, Michael and King, Lindsay. Detecting regular precession using a new gravitational waveform model directly parameterized by both precession amplitude and frequency. 2025. arXiv:2509.10628

  141. [152]

    and Vitale, Salvatore

    Varma, Vijay and Biscoveanu, Sylvia and Isi, Maximiliano and Farr, Will M. and Vitale, Salvatore. Hints of Spin-Orbit Resonances in the Binary Black Hole Population. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.031101. arXiv:2107.09693

  142. [153]

    A taxonomy of black-hole binary spin precession and nutation

    Gangardt, Daria and Steinle, Nathan and Kesden, Michael and Gerosa, Davide and Stoikos, Evangelos. A taxonomy of black-hole binary spin precession and nutation. Phys. Rev. D. 2021. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.124026. arXiv:2103.03894

  143. [154]

    Probing Spin Orbit Resonances with the Binary Black Hole Population

    Biscoveanu, Sylvia. Probing Spin Orbit Resonances with the Binary Black Hole Population. Astrophys. J. 2026. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae1a62. arXiv:2502.04278

  144. [155]

    and Haster, Carl-Johan and Ng, Ken K

    Biscoveanu, Sylvia and Callister, Thomas A. and Haster, Carl-Johan and Ng, Ken K. Y. and Vitale, Salvatore and Farr, Will M. The Binary Black Hole Spin Distribution Likely Broadens with Redshift. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2022. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac71a8. arXiv:2204.01578

  145. [156]

    Pathways for producing binary black holes with large misaligned spins in the isolated formation channel

    Steinle, Nathan and Kesden, Michael. Pathways for producing binary black holes with large misaligned spins in the isolated formation channel. Phys. Rev. D. 2021. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.063032. arXiv:2010.00078

  146. [157]

    Orbital characteristics of binary systems after asymmetric supernova explosions

    Kalogera, Vassiliki. Orbital characteristics of binary systems after asymmetric supernova explosions. Astrophys. J. 1996. doi:10.1086/177974. arXiv:astro-ph/9605186

  147. [158]

    and Farr, Ben

    Fishbach, Maya and Holz, Daniel E. and Farr, Ben. Are LIGO's Black Holes Made From Smaller Black Holes?. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2017. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa7045. arXiv:1703.06869

  148. [159]

    and others

    Bavera, Simone S. and others. The impact of mass-transfer physics on the observable properties of field binary black hole populations. Astron. Astrophys. 2021. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039804. arXiv:2010.16333

  149. [160]

    and Jermyn, Adam S

    Fuller, Jim and Piro, Anthony L. and Jermyn, Adam S. Slowing the spins of stellar cores. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2019. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz514. arXiv:1902.08227

  150. [161]

    A new route towards merging massive black holes. Astron. Astrophys. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628133 , adsurl =

  151. [162]

    The influence of the distribution of cosmic star formation at different metallicities on the properties of merging double compact objects. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty3087 , adsurl =

  152. [163]

    Astrophys

    The Locations of Features in the Mass Distribution of Merging Binary Black Holes Are Robust against Uncertainties in the Metallicity-dependent Cosmic Star Formation History. Astrophys. J. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acbf51 , archivePrefix =. 2209.03385 , primaryClass =

  153. [164]

    and Berti, Emanuele and Bulik, Tomasz and Mandel, Ilya and O'Shaughnessy, Richard

    Dominik, Michal and Belczynski, Krzysztof and Fryer, Christopher and Holz, Daniel E. and Berti, Emanuele and Bulik, Tomasz and Mandel, Ilya and O'Shaughnessy, Richard. Double Compact Objects II: Cosmological Merger Rates. Astrophys. J. 2013. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/779/1/72. arX...

  154. [165]

    The first decade of gravitational-wave measurements of black hole spins

    Biscoveanu, Sylvia. The first decade of gravitational-wave measurements of black hole spins. 2026. arXiv:2606.06209

  155. [166]

    , keywords =

    On the Maximum Stellar Rotation to form a Black Hole without an Accompanying Luminous Transient. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abb818 , archivePrefix =. 2005.10212 , primaryClass =

  156. [167]

    , keywords =

    Very Massive, Rapidly Spinning Binary Black Hole Progenitors through Chemically Homogeneous Evolution The Case of GW231123. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae20f1 , archivePrefix =. 2509.00154 , primaryClass =

Pith tools

Reviewed June 26, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.