Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 46 references

The Electron-Ion Collider can reveal long-lived dark hadrons through displaced decays.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 21:03 UTC pith:37U6LPJE

load-bearing objection Clean, standard dark-shower projection: the displaced dark-pion reach at the EIC is plausible, with the usual caveats about background assumptions and the hadronization model. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.16400 v1 pith:37U6LPJE submitted 2026-07-17 hep-ph hep-exnucl-ex

Long-Lived Dark Hadrons at the Electron-Ion Collider

Hooman Davoudiasl , Hongkai Liu , Ethan T. Neil This is my paper
classification hep-ph hep-exnucl-ex
keywords dark hadronsdark showersdisplaced verticeslong-lived particleselectron-ion colliderdark QCDaxion-like mediatorhidden valley
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper argues that a GeV-scale confining dark sector — a 'dark QCD' with two light quark flavors — can be discovered at the Electron-Ion Collider (EIC) through displaced decays of neutral dark pions. The authors build a minimal portal in which a new complex scalar couples feebly to electrons and dark quarks; after confinement, neutral dark pions mix with the portal's axion-like partner and inherit a small coupling to electrons, making them long-lived. Using a dark-shower simulation and an EIC geometry with a 100 µm to 1 m fiducial decay window, they predict that requiring two displaced dark-pion decays yields a nearly background-free signal. For a mediator mass of 12 GeV, beyond the kinematic reach of B-factory experiments, the EIC covers couplings g_Se down to about 10^-5 for dark pion masses near 0.1 GeV. If correct, the EIC becomes a dedicated tool for studying how dark quarks hadronize near the GeV scale.

Core claim

The central claim is that the EIC, exploiting its ability to record soft final-state particles without a hard trigger, can cover parameter space for long-lived dark hadrons that will otherwise be unexplored for years. In the benchmark model, production proceeds through a scalar mediator S produced coherently off heavy ions, which decays into dark quarks; the dark shower hadronizes into dark pions, and the neutral one decays to e+e- with proper decay length given by l ~ (fD/0.1 GeV)^-2 (m_piD/0.3 GeV)^-1 (Delta me/me)^2 (gSe/5e-5)^-4 × 0.25 m. Combining this with a simulated multiplicity and the probability for at least two decays within the fiducial volume, the paper derives 3-event contours

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the neutral dark pion's decay length, which follows from a small mixing angle between the axion-like state a and π0_D induced by dark-isospin breaking (mχ1 ≠ mχ2). This mixing transfers the electron coupling g_ae to the dark pion, giving π0_D → e+e-. The reach estimate also rests on the dark-shower simulation that sets the neutral-pion multiplicity and boost distribution, and on the fiducial-decay probability P_fid = exp(-L_min/L_bar) - exp(-L_max/L_bar) for a 100 µm–1 m volume. The combination P(≥2 fiducial decays) in the signal count N_S = σ(eA→eA S) L P is what turns the single-particle decay length into an event-level discovery metric.

Load-bearing premise

The projected reach rests on the dark-shower hadronization simulation's predicted multiplicity and momentum spectra; if a dark SU(3) with quark masses of a few tens of MeV actually produces fewer or softer neutral dark pions, the 3-event contours would shift.

What would settle it

Take the benchmark mS = 12 GeV, m_rhoD = 1.5 GeV, m_piD = 0.1 GeV with g_Se = 10^-4 at the EIC (100 fb^-1): if a complete detector simulation finds fewer than 3 candidate events with two fiducial e+e- vertices, or if an independent dark-shower generator predicts a mean neutral-pion multiplicity below ~2 per event, the claimed reach fails.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • For a 12 GeV mediator, the EIC projects at least 3 events with two displaced e+e- pairs at couplings g_Se ≈ 10^-4–10^-5 and dark pion masses down to ~0.1 GeV.
  • At 5 GeV mediator mass, B-factory data samples probe smaller couplings, while the EIC's vertex resolution gives better reach at larger couplings because g_Se = g_ae ties larger production to shorter lifetimes.
  • The EIC reach is complementary to Belle II at low dark-pion mass where off-shell production at B factories suppresses sensitivity.
  • Stable charged dark pions produce missing energy, and the veto on incoherent nuclear scattering makes the search nearly background-free.
  • The same conclusion is expected to hold for other GeV-scale confining theories with similar couplings, and for alternative portals such as a dark photon.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the equality g_Se = g_ae is relaxed, the reach contours shift: smaller g_ae relative to g_Se makes pions longer-lived and would extend the covered region at small couplings, while larger g_ae would shrink it; the paper's benchmark pins the two together.
  • The sensitivity to dark-pion multiplicity suggests a sharp test: a full detector-level simulation that verifies the simulated multiplicity of at least 2–3 neutral pions per event for mS = 12 GeV would independently corroborate or undermine the projected contours.
  • If hadronization at light dark-quark masses produces softer pion spectra than the current shower model, the fiducial-volume acceptance for boosts would change; scanning the EIC electron-beam energy between 10 and 18 GeV provides a handle to map this model-dependence.
  • The same displaced-vertex logic could apply to dark baryons: if the lightest dark baryon is long-lived and decays to a pion plus lepton, the EIC's soft-particle acceptance might probe asymmetric dark matter masses near 1 GeV that B-factory searches cannot reach.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a benchmark dark-sector model with SU(3)_D confinement at the GeV scale, two light dark quark flavors, and a complex scalar portal connecting the dark sector to electrons. The low-energy effective theory contains a long-lived flavor-diagonal dark pion π0_D whose decay to e+e− is induced by mixing with a light axion-like state a. The authors compute the production of the radial scalar S in coherent electron-ion scattering at the EIC, simulate the subsequent dark shower with the PYTHIA Hidden Valley module, and obtain 3-event reach contours in the (m_πD, g_Se) plane for m_S = 5 and 12 GeV, with E_e = 10 and 18 GeV. They argue that the EIC can probe non-B-factory parameter space, especially on-shell S production at m_S = 12 GeV and dark pion masses down to ~0.1 GeV.

Significance. If the quantitative reach is robust, this is a timely and useful phenomenological result: it identifies a concrete, low-threshold signature (multiple displaced vertices plus missing energy) for which the EIC's soft-particle capabilities are advantageous, and it demonstrates complementarity with Belle II/BaBar for m_S beyond the B-factory kinematic limit. The chiral-Lagrangian derivation in Eqs. (8)–(13) is internally consistent and transparent, and the dark-hadron spectrum inputs (m_ρD/f_D) are taken from independent lattice work [37], so the central decay-length formula is not fitted to the EIC signal. The paper also provides ancillary data files, which aids reproducibility. The main weakness is that the reach contours are mediated by a PYTHIA hadronization model in a very light-dark-quark regime that has not been validated, and by a 'nearly background free' assumption that is asserted rather than demonstrated. These issues affect the quantitative boundary of the claimed coverage, not the internal consistency of the model construction.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III, Eq. (18) and Fig. 1] The EIC reach is linear in P(≥2 fiducial decays), which is taken entirely from the PYTHIA Hidden Valley module with the spectrum of Eq. (7). At the low-m_πD edge of the claimed coverage (m_πD ≈ 0.1 GeV), the dark quark mass is m_χ = m_πD^2/m_ρD ≈ 3–7 MeV. This is far below the quark masses for which the Hidden Valley hadronization model has been calibrated against lattice data or other generators. The check that the multiplicity is insensitive to the dark quark mass is a single-parameter variation and does not validate the hadronization model itself. A factor-of-2 uncertainty in P shifts the 3-event contour by roughly sqrt(2) in g_Se; combined with the g_Se^{-4} lifetime scaling, this can change or close the low-m_πD region in Fig. 3. Please quantify this uncertainty by varying shower/hadronization parameters or cross-checking with an independent model, or restrict the claims to paramete
  2. [Section III, after Eq. (17)] The paper states 'we expect this search to be nearly background free' and uses N_S = 3 as the benchmark for the contours. No detector-level background simulation or estimate is provided for the multi-displaced-vertex plus missing-energy signature. Given the EIC environment, this assumption is load-bearing: if backgrounds are not negligible, the 3-event contours lose their significance. The reference to [34] supports the missing-energy handle but does not demonstrate a negligible background for the present two-π0_D displaced-vertex requirement. Either provide an explicit background estimate (even a conservative one) or clearly present the contours as 3-signal-event sensitivities under an assumed zero background, rather than as discovery reaches.
  3. [Section III, Fig. 2 and accompanying text] The solid black contours from BaBar are described as 'current bounds' and 'limits', but the analysis appears to be a 3-event recast using the cuts of Eq. (19), with no treatment of observed events or backgrounds in the signal region. If these are expected-sensitivity projections, they should be relabeled; if they are intended as actual limits, the observed event count and background model must be given. This does not affect the m_S = 12 GeV EIC claim directly, but it matters for the stated complementarity and for the 'otherwise unexplored' conclusion in the summary.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section II, Eq. (7) and text] The text says 'approximate SU(2) flavor symmetry' but fixes m_χ1 = 3 m_χ2. A factor-3 mass splitting is a large explicit breaking; please quantify what 'approximate' means here, and note the impact on the chiral expansion used in Eqs. (8)–(11).
  2. [Section III, Fig. 1 caption] The axis labels in the arXiv rendering appear as '10 5' and '10 4'; these should be 10^{-5} and 10^{-4}. Please ensure the final typeset figures have correct negative exponents.
  3. [Footnote 2] The statement that achieving the measured electron mass 'may entail some mild (≳20%) tuning' is left unexplored. Since the decay length in Eq. (13) depends on (Δm_e/m_e)^2, the tuning assumption affects the numerical reach; a brief quantitative statement of the allowed range of Δm_e would be useful.
  4. [Section III] The fixed value m_a = 15 MeV is not varied. The mixing angle in Eq. (10) depends on m_a^2 − m_πD^2, and near m_πD ≈ m_a the approximation in Eq. (13) breaks down. A sentence on the sensitivity to m_a, or a plot of the reach for a different m_a, would strengthen the presentation.
  5. [Section III, Eq. (7)] The chosen ratio m_ρD/f_D = 2.0/0.34 ≈ 5.88 is quoted as corresponding to the lattice value ≈5.75 from [37]. The small 2% difference should be acknowledged explicitly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the EIC reach is a self-contained Monte Carlo projection built from explicit model parameters and independent lattice inputs; self-citations are contextual, not load-bearing.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained in the relevant sense. The production cross section, decay length (Eq. 13), and event count (Eq. 18) are all explicit functions of declared model parameters (m_S, m_piD, m_rhoD, g_Se, f_D, v_Phi), none of which are fitted to the EIC signal. The dark-hadron spectrum in Eq. (7) uses m_rhoD/f_D ~ 5.75 from the external lattice QCD computation of Ref. [37], which is parameter-free and does not contain the target EIC prediction; the author overlap there does not make the input circular. The multiplicity and boost distributions entering P(>=2 fiducial decays) are generated by the PYTHIA Hidden Valley module, which is a modeling input rather than a fit to the data used to define the reach. The self-citations [32] (fiducial L_min/L_max choice) and [34] (missing-energy background handle) are contextual and non-reductive: adjusting those assumptions would shift the projected contours but would not make the prediction equal to its input by construction. The main caveat, unvalidated dark-shower hadronization, is a model-dependence/robustness concern, not circularity. No equation or fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

6 free parameters · 6 axioms · 3 invented entities

The model inputs are mostly free parameters chosen to define benchmarks; the only external physics anchors are lattice inputs [37] and the PYTHIA HV generator. No parameter is fitted to the target EIC signal, so the reach is a genuine projection rather than a fit.

free parameters (6)
  • m_S (scalar mediator mass) = 5 GeV, 12 GeV
    Treated as free phenomenological parameters for the benchmark scenarios (Section II: 'The masses of S, a, and the dark hadronic scale are treated as free phenomenological parameters').
  • m_a (axion-like mediator mass) = 15 MeV
    Fixed by hand; sets the dark pion decay mixing in Eq. (10) with m_πD ≫ m_a.
  • m_ρD (dark rho mass / confinement scale proxy) = 1.5 GeV, 3.0 GeV
    Dark hadronic scale, free parameter for benchmarks; relates to Λ_D via m_ρD = 2.0Λ_D.
  • m_πD (dark pion mass) = 100 MeV fixed for Fig. 1; scanned ~0.1-0.6 GeV in Figs 2-3
    Controls dark pion multiplicity and decay length (Eq. 13); free model parameter.
  • g_Se (electron portal coupling) = scanned 10^-5 to 10^-3
    Sets v_Φ = Δm_e/g_Se and the decay length; the main parameter the projected contours are drawn in.
  • m_χ1/m_χ2 = 3
    Dark quark mass ratio fixed by hand; sets the dark isospin breaking needed for the a–π0_D mixing through Eqs. (9)-(11).
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption m_ρD/f_D ≈ 5.75 with f_D = 0.34Λ_D holds for the GeV-scale SU(3) dark theory (from lattice QCD [37])
    Used in Eq. (7) to fix the dark hadron spectrum; taken from SU(3) lattice results for composite phenomenology.
  • domain assumption PYTHIA 8.3 Hidden Valley module reliably models dark showering and hadronization for an SU(3)_D, N_f=2 sector near the GeV scale
    Generates the multiplicity and boost distributions used in Eq. (18); no validation against lattice or data for this specific theory.
  • standard math The chiral Lagrangian (Eq. 8) with the η'_D integrated out describes π0_D–a mixing
    Standard chiral perturbation theory treatment; used to derive the mixing angle and decay length.
  • domain assumption The dimension-5 portal operator (1/M)ΦH L̄ e_R plus a separate tree-level contribution to m_e reproduces the electron mass (with ≳20% tuning)
    Stated in footnote 2; the tuning is acknowledged but not quantified in the reach projections.
  • domain assumption Coherent eA→eAS production uses a Helm form factor and Z² enhancement, with the incoherent contribution vetoed by the zero-degree calorimeter
    Standard nuclear-physics input (Ref [42]) and experimental assumption for the EIC search.
  • ad hoc to paper The search is nearly background-free given the multi-displaced-vertex + missing-energy requirements
    Asserted in Section III without a detector-level background simulation; the N_S=3 contours assume zero background.
invented entities (3)
  • Dark sector SU(3)_D with dark quarks χ1, χ2 independent evidence
    purpose: Produce dark showers and dark pions; motivated by composite/asymmetric dark matter
    Falsifiable via displaced e+e− pairs at EIC and B-factories; the benchmark predicts specific reach contours.
  • Complex scalar Φ with radial S and Goldstone a (axion-like) independent evidence
    purpose: Portal mediator to SM electrons (S production), and a provides the mixing that makes neutral dark pions decay
    S has production signature eA→eAS and a mixes into π0_D→e+e−; also subject to ALP and scalar searches.
  • Flavor-diagonal neutral dark pion π0_D independent evidence
    purpose: The long-lived displaced-vertex state searched for
    Decay π0_D→e+e− with macroscopic lifetime (Eq. 13) is a concrete, testable signature.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 8221 in / 20919 out tokens · 175995 ms · 2026-08-01T21:03:49.510876+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study a dark non-Abelian gauge sector with GeV-scale confinement. The dark sector is assumed to couple only feebly to the Standard Model, while its low-energy spectrum may contain long-lived flavor-diagonal dark pions. Signals of these states are particularly well suited to the Electron-Ion Collider (EIC), where the absence of a hard trigger requirement and the capability to record soft final-state particles offer a complementary probe of dark hadronization dynamics. We present a benchmark portal construction, discuss the mixing between an axion-like mediator and dark pions, and identify the resulting displaced-decay signature.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.16400 by Ethan T. Neil, Hongkai Liu, Hooman Davoudiasl.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Neutral dark pion multiplicity distributions for the four [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The 3-event contours for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 39 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    J. M. Cline, Dark atoms and composite dark matter, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes52, 1 (2022), arXiv:2108.10314 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  2. [2]

    Asadi, A

    P. Asadi, A. Batz, and G. D. Kribs, Rich Phenomenology from Simple Ingredients: A Review of Confining Dark Sectors, (2026), arXiv:2606.30760 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  3. [3]

    Davoudiasl and R

    H. Davoudiasl and R. N. Mohapatra, On Relating the Genesis of Cosmic Baryons and Dark Matter, New J. Phys.14, 095011 (2012), arXiv:1203.1247 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  4. [4]

    Petraki and R

    K. Petraki and R. R. V olkas, Review of asymmetric dark mat- ter, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A28, 1330028 (2013), arXiv:1305.4939 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  5. [5]

    K. M. Zurek, Asymmetric Dark Matter: Theories, Signatures, and Constraints, Phys. Rept.537, 91 (2014), arXiv:1308.0338 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  6. [6]

    T. Han, Z. Si, K. M. Zurek, and M. J. Strassler, Phenomenol- ogy of hidden valleys at hadron colliders, JHEP07, 008, arXiv:0712.2041 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

  7. [7]

    Baumgart, C

    M. Baumgart, C. Cheung, J. T. Ruderman, L.-T. Wang, and I. Yavin, Non-Abelian Dark Sectors and Their Collider Signa- tures, JHEP04, 014, arXiv:0901.0283 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  8. [8]

    Falkowski, J

    A. Falkowski, J. T. Ruderman, T. V olansky, and J. Zu- pan, Hidden Higgs Decaying to Lepton Jets, JHEP05, 077, arXiv:1002.2952 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  9. [9]

    Cohen, M

    T. Cohen, M. Lisanti, and H. K. Lou, Semivisible Jets: Dark Matter Undercover at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 171804 (2015), arXiv:1503.00009 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  10. [10]

    Schwaller, D

    P. Schwaller, D. Stolarski, and A. Weiler, Emerging Jets, JHEP 05, 059, arXiv:1502.05409 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  11. [11]

    Cohen, M

    T. Cohen, M. Lisanti, H. K. Lou, and S. Mishra-Sharma, LHC Searches for Dark Sector Showers, JHEP11, 196, arXiv:1707.05326 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  12. [12]

    Knapen, J

    S. Knapen, J. Shelton, and D. Xu, Perturbative benchmark mod- els for a dark shower search program, Phys. Rev. D103, 115013 (2021), arXiv:2103.01238 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  13. [13]

    Albouyet al., Theory, phenomenology, and experimental av- enues for dark showers: a Snowmass 2021 report, Eur

    G. Albouyet al., Theory, phenomenology, and experimental av- enues for dark showers: a Snowmass 2021 report, Eur. Phys. J. C82, 1132 (2022), arXiv:2203.09503 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  14. [14]

    Cohen, J

    T. Cohen, J. Roloff, and C. Scherb, Dark sector showers in the Lund jet plane, Phys. Rev. D108, L031501 (2023), arXiv:2301.07732 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    Cheng, X.-H

    H.-C. Cheng, X.-H. Jiang, L. Li, and E. Salvioni, Dark showers from Z-dark Z’ mixing, JHEP04, 081, arXiv:2401.08785 [hep- ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  16. [16]

    Cheng, X.-H

    H.-C. Cheng, X.-H. Jiang, and L. Li, Phenomenology of elec- troweak portal dark showers: high energy direct probes and low energy complementarity, JHEP01, 149, arXiv:2408.13304 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  17. [17]

    Bernreuther, K

    E. Bernreuther, K. B ¨ose, T. Ferber, C. Hearty, F. Kahlhoefer, A. Morandini, and K. Schmidt-Hoberg, Forecasting dark show- ers at Belle II, JHEP12, 005, arXiv:2203.08824 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  18. [18]

    Lu and C

    C.-T. Lu and C. Xi, Searching for leptophilic composite asym- metric dark sector at e+e- colliders, Phys. Rev. D112, 095027 (2025), arXiv:2509.12504 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    J. K. Adkinset al., Design of the ECCE detector for the Elec- tron Ion Collider, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A1073, 170240 (2025), arXiv:2209.02580 [physics.ins-det]

    arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    Chacko, H.-S

    Z. Chacko, H.-S. Goh, and R. Harnik, The Twin Higgs: Natural electroweak breaking from mirror symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 231802 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0506256

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  21. [21]

    Chacko, H.-S

    Z. Chacko, H.-S. Goh, and R. Harnik, A Twin Higgs model from left-right symmetry, JHEP01, 108, arXiv:hep- ph/0512088

    arXiv

  22. [22]

    Falkowski, S

    A. Falkowski, S. Pokorski, and M. Schmaltz, Twin SUSY, Phys. Rev. D74, 035003 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0604066

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  23. [23]

    Chang, L

    S. Chang, L. J. Hall, and N. Weiner, A Supersymmetric twin Higgs, Phys. Rev. D75, 035009 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0604076

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  24. [24]

    Craig, S

    N. Craig, S. Knapen, and P. Longhi, Neutral Naturalness from Orbifold Higgs Models, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 061803 (2015), arXiv:1410.6808 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  25. [25]

    Barbieri, D

    R. Barbieri, D. Greco, R. Rattazzi, and A. Wulzer, The Com- posite Twin Higgs scenario, JHEP08, 161, arXiv:1501.07803 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  26. [26]

    Chacko, N

    Z. Chacko, N. Craig, P. J. Fox, and R. Harnik, Cosmology in Mirror Twin Higgs and Neutrino Masses, JHEP07, 023, arXiv:1611.07975 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  27. [27]

    Chacko, D

    Z. Chacko, D. Curtin, M. Geller, and Y . Tsai, Cosmolog- ical Signatures of a Mirror Twin Higgs, JHEP09, 163, arXiv:1803.03263 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  28. [28]

    Batell, M

    B. Batell, M. Low, E. T. Neil, and C. B. Verhaaren, Re- view of neutral naturalness, Phys. Rept.1165, 1 (2026), arXiv:2203.05531 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2026

  29. [29]

    J. E. Juknevich, Pure-glue hidden valleys through the Higgs portal, JHEP08, 121, arXiv:0911.5616 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  30. [30]

    A. Batz, T. Cohen, D. Curtin, C. Gemmell, and G. D. Kribs, Dark sector glueballs at the LHC, JHEP04, 070, arXiv:2310.13731 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [31]

    Batell, T

    B. Batell, T. Ghosh, T. Han, and K. Xie, Heavy neutral leptons at the Electron-Ion Collider, JHEP03, 020, arXiv:2210.09287 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [32]

    Davoudiasl, R

    H. Davoudiasl, R. Marcarelli, and E. T. Neil, Displaced signals of hidden vectors at the Electron-Ion Collider, Phys. Rev. D 108, 075017 (2023), arXiv:2307.00102 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  33. [33]

    Balkin, O

    R. Balkin, O. Hen, W. Li, H. Liu, T. Ma, Y . Soreq, and M. Williams, Probing axion-like particles at the Electron-Ion Collider, JHEP02, 123, arXiv:2310.08827 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  34. [34]

    Davoudiasl and H

    H. Davoudiasl and H. Liu, Electron-ion collider as a discovery tool for invisible dark bosons, Phys. Rev. D112, 075001 (2025), arXiv:2505.08871 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Balkin, T

    R. Balkin, T. Coren, A. Jentsch, H. Liu, M. Ovchynnikov, Y . Soreq, and S. Trifinopoulos, Braking protons at the EIC: from invisible meson decay to new physics searches, (2025), arXiv:2601.00068 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Balkin, T

    R. Balkin, T. Coren, A. Jentsch, H. Liu, M. Ovchynnikov, Y . Soreq, and S. Trifinopoulos, On Exclusive Coherent Pro- duction of Bosons in Electron-Proton Collisions, (2026), arXiv:2604.08667 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  37. [37]

    DeGrand and E

    T. DeGrand and E. T. Neil, Repurposing lattice QCD results for composite phenomenology, Phys. Rev. D101, 034504 (2020), 5 [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 112, 079902 (2025)], arXiv:1910.08561 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2020

  38. [38]

    McKeen, A

    D. McKeen, A. E. Nelson, S. Reddy, and D. Zhou, Neutron stars exclude light dark baryons, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 061802 (2018), arXiv:1802.08244 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  39. [39]

    Carloni and T

    L. Carloni and T. Sjostrand, Visible Effects of Invisible Hidden Valley Radiation, JHEP09, 105, arXiv:1006.2911 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  40. [40]

    Carloni, J

    L. Carloni, J. Rathsman, and T. Sjostrand, Discerning Secluded Sector gauge structures, JHEP04, 091, arXiv:1102.3795 [hep- ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  41. [41]

    Bierlichet al., A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3, SciPost Phys

    C. Bierlichet al., A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3, SciPost Phys. Codeb.2022, 8 (2022), arXiv:2203.11601 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  42. [42]

    R. H. Helm, Inelastic and Elastic Scattering of 187-Mev Elec- trons from Selected Even-Even Nuclei, Phys. Rev.104, 1466 (1956)

    1956

  43. [43]

    Aubertet al.(BaBar), The BaBar detector, Nucl

    B. Aubertet al.(BaBar), The BaBar detector, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A479, 1 (2002), arXiv:hep-ex/0105044

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  44. [44]

    J. P. Leeset al.(BaBar), Search for Long-Lived Particles ine +e− Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 171801 (2015), arXiv:1502.02580 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  45. [45]

    Adachiet al.(Belle-II), Search for a long-lived spin-0 medi- ator in b→s transitions at the Belle II experiment, Phys

    I. Adachiet al.(Belle-II), Search for a long-lived spin-0 medi- ator in b→s transitions at the Belle II experiment, Phys. Rev. D 108, L111104 (2023), arXiv:2306.02830 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  46. [46]

    Jaeckel and A

    J. Jaeckel and A. V . Phan, Searching dark photons using dis- placed vertices at Belle II — with backgrounds, JHEP08, 062, arXiv:2312.12522 [hep-ph]. 6

    arXiv