pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.22560 · v1 · pith:3AQWFNZYnew · submitted 2026-05-21 · ✦ hep-th · math-ph· math.GN· math.MP· math.QA· math.RT

Shading A-polynomials via huge representations of U_q(mathfrak{su}_N)

Dmitry Galakhov , Alexei Morozov This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 04:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th math-phmath.GNmath.MPmath.QAmath.RT
keywords A-polynomialsquantum groupssu_Nknot complementsChern-Simons theoryClebsch-Gordan chordscharacter varietiesknot invariants
0
0 comments X

The pith

A double scaling limit of huge representations in U_q(su_N) produces classical shaded A-polynomials for SU(N) knot complements.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes constructing classical shaded A-polynomials A_a(ℓ_b, m_c) for higher-rank groups SU(N) from the character varieties of knot complements. It relies on a Clebsch-Gordan chord formalism that originates in the quantum group U_q(su_N) and has a natural interpretation in 2d WZW conformal field theories. The key step is a double scaling limit in which the deformation parameter q = e^ℏ goes to 1 while representation weights become arbitrarily large such that ℏ times each weight remains finite. A reader would care because the same limit converts the quantum difference operators that annihilate colored Jones polynomials into their classical counterparts, now generalized beyond the SU(2) case. The authors illustrate the result with explicit polynomials for the knots 3_1, 4_1 and 5_1 in the su_3 setting.

Core claim

We suggest a construction of classical shaded A-polynomials A_a(ℓ_b,m_c) associated to Lie groups SU(N) by considering a double scaling limit when q=e^ℏ, ℏ→0 and the representations are huge, in particular, highest weight vector components w_i→∞ so that ℏ w_i ∼ m_i remain finite. CG chords have a natural interpretation in terms of 2d CFTs of WZW type, or, alternatively, in terms of quantum group U_q(su_N). In the case of su_2 CG chords could be associated to Reeb chords in a knot contact homology framework, yet the formalism extends to arbitrary su_N allowing generalization of A-polynomials to arbitrary representations as well.

What carries the argument

Clebsch-Gordan chord formalism of U_q(su_N) that defines shaded indices a,b,c and converts to classical A-polynomials under double scaling of huge representations.

If this is right

  • Classical shaded A-polynomials become available for any SU(N) and any representation.
  • The same chord techniques are expected to help derive quantum A-polynomials for arbitrary Lie algebras.
  • Explicit classical polynomials are obtained for knots 3_1, 4_1 and 5_1 when the gauge group is SU(3).
  • The construction offers an alternative to knot-contact-homology augmentation polynomials that may avoid extra spurious roots.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The approach may extend directly to superalgebras, as the authors note the techniques should apply to arbitrary Lie superalgebras.
  • If the scaling works cleanly, the resulting polynomials could serve as classical limits for higher-rank colored HOMFLY polynomials and their associated difference operators.
  • The construction supplies a concrete route to test whether the character variety of a knot complement admits a natural shading by the simple roots of su_N.

Load-bearing premise

The Clebsch-Gordan chord formalism extends naturally to arbitrary su_N and the double scaling limit with huge representations produces the correct classical A-polynomials without introducing spurious roots.

What would settle it

Explicit computation of the shaded A-polynomial for the trefoil knot in the su_3 case, followed by checking whether its zero set exactly matches the expected SU(3) character variety constraint for the knot complement or contains extra roots.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.22560 by Alexei Morozov, Dmitry Galakhov.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Meridian and longitude operators on knot complement S 3 \ K A notion of a classical A-polynomial was deformed to a notion of a quantum A-polynomial [2–14] as a difference operator annihilating a Jones polynomial of a knot K as a function of representation spin r: A K( ˆℓ, mˆ |q)JK(r|q) = 0, ˆℓ JK(r|q) = JK(r + 1|q), m J ˆ K(r|q) = q rJK(r|q). (1.2) 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: All roads lead to A-polynomials relations of the present CG chord formalism to other contexts for constructing A-polynomials: knot contact homology, WZW models, 3d TQFTs and link symbols introduced in [14]. Eventually in Sec. 5 we construct examples of shaded A-polynomials for some knots in su3. 2 Quantum group Uq(g) and Reshetikhin-Turaev formalism 2.1 Quantum group Uq(g) Let us start with a brief review … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Deriving equations on CG chords via equivalences of moves. We might distinguish two types of equations for all CG chords by choosing which end in a CG chord (3.6) is pulled first in a move (a)→(b) in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: ). It should be stressed that the latter move modifies knot framing, so the procedure delivers not the same A-polynomials, rather A-polynomials with changed coordinates taking framing into account. Here we will not present a complete proof for our construction, rather we will map out possible pathways towards this goal. braid ∼= braid braid ∼= braid (a) (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Surface triangulations are formed by triplets of Stokes lines (red lines) starting from branching points (green crosses) of the spectral cover and running towards singularities. Considering two such triangulations differing by a flip as temporal slices form a “dumpling” operator. This reasoning leads to a quasi-classical calculation of Jones polynomials for representations of a large spin in the form of Hi… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: A trefoil knot 31 diagram and its braid representation. 5.2 Trefoil knot We start with the trefoil knot 31 depicted in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: A cinquefoil knot 51 diagram and its braid representation. 5.3 Cinquefoil knot The cinquefoil knot 51 depicted in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: A figure-eight knot 41 diagram and its braid representation. A task of computing respective shaded A-polynomials for the figure-eight knot depicted in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Classical A-polynomials $A(\ell,m)$ define constraints on coordinates $\ell$ and $m$ in $SL(2,\mathbb{C})$ (a complexification of $SU(2)$) character varieties associated to knot complements $S^3\setminus K$. Quantum A-polynomials $\hat A(\hat \ell,\hat m)$ are difference operators annihilating Jones polynomials believed to represent wave functions of 3d Chern-Simons theory with gauge group $SU(2)$ on a toroidal pipe surrounding the knot $K$ strand -- a boundary of the knot complements $S^3\setminus K$. We suggest a construction of classical shaded A-polynomials $A_a(\ell_b,m_c)$ associated to Lie groups $SU(N)$. We exploit a formalism of Clebsh-Gordan (CG) chords, where indices $a$, $b$, $c$ run over $1,\ldots,N-1$. CG chords have a natural interpretation in terms of 2d CFTs of WZW type, or, alternatively, in terms of quantum group $U_q(\mathfrak{su}_N)$. In the case of $\mathfrak{su}_2$ CG chords could be associated to Reeb chords in a knot contact homology (KCH) framework. KCH suggests its own analogue of A-polynomials known as augmentation polynomials allowed to have extra spurious roots in principle. Yet the CG chord formalism could be easily extended to arbitrary $\mathfrak{su}_N$ allowing us to generalize the construction of A(ugmentation)-polynomials to arbitrary $\mathfrak{su}_N$ and arbitrary representation as well. Primarily we aim at classical A-polynomials by considering a double scaling limit when $q=e^{\hbar}$, $\hbar\to 0$ and the representations are huge, in particular, highest weight vector components $w_i\to \infty$ so that $\hbar w_i\sim m_i$ remain finite. Still we expect the presented techniques would be helpful in deriving quantum A-polynomials for arbitrary Lie (super)algebras $\mathfrak{g}$. Also we discuss explicit examples of A-polynomials for knots $3_1$, $4_1$ and $5_1$ for $\mathfrak{g}=\mathfrak{su}_3$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper suggests a construction of classical shaded A-polynomials A_a(ℓ_b,m_c) for SU(N) using a double scaling limit of Clebsch-Gordan chord operators in huge representations of U_q(su_N), where q=e^ℏ, ℏ→0 and highest weights w_i→∞ with ℏ w_i ∼ m_i finite. It generalizes from the su(2) case associated with knot contact homology to higher ranks, provides explicit examples for knots 3_1, 4_1, 5_1 at su_3, and discusses extensions to quantum A-polynomials for general Lie algebras.

Significance. If the proposed limit correctly produces the classical A-polynomials matching the SL(N,C) character variety constraints, this would represent a significant advance by offering a systematic quantum-group based method to compute higher-rank A-polynomials, which are currently difficult to obtain. The explicit examples for low-crossing knots could serve as benchmarks for future work in quantum topology and representation theory.

major comments (3)
  1. [Double scaling limit construction] The central claim that the ħ→0 limit with huge representations yields the correct classical shaded A-polynomials is not supported by an independent check against the defining equations of the SU(N) character variety or other known constructions; this is load-bearing for the validity of the suggestion.
  2. [Explicit examples for su_3] In the computations for knots 3_1, 4_1 and 5_1, the resulting polynomials are presented without cross-verification against independent definitions of the SU(3) A-polynomial (e.g., via augmentation or character variety methods), leaving open the possibility of spurious roots as noted in the su_2 KCH analogue.
  3. [Extension of CG chord formalism] The extension of the Clebsch-Gordan chord formalism from su_2 to arbitrary su_N (with indices 1 to N-1) is asserted but lacks a detailed justification or reference showing that the properties necessary for the scaling limit to produce the A-polynomial are preserved.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract and introduction could benefit from a clearer statement of the main result, perhaps including one explicit example polynomial.
  2. Notation for the shaded indices a, b, c and the variables ℓ_b, m_c should be introduced with a small example to aid readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We respond point by point to the major comments below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Double scaling limit construction] The central claim that the ħ→0 limit with huge representations yields the correct classical shaded A-polynomials is not supported by an independent check against the defining equations of the SU(N) character variety or other known constructions; this is load-bearing for the validity of the suggestion.

    Authors: We agree that an independent verification against the SU(N) character variety equations would strengthen the proposal. The manuscript presents the double scaling limit as a natural generalization from the su(2) case, motivated by the structure of U_q(su_N) and CG coefficients. We will revise the introduction and conclusion to explicitly state that this remains a conjectural construction pending such checks, and we will outline a possible route for verification using known low-rank character variety data. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Explicit examples for su_3] In the computations for knots 3_1, 4_1 and 5_1, the resulting polynomials are presented without cross-verification against independent definitions of the SU(3) A-polynomial (e.g., via augmentation or character variety methods), leaving open the possibility of spurious roots as noted in the su_2 KCH analogue.

    Authors: The manuscript already references the possibility of spurious roots in the su(2) augmentation polynomial analogue. The su(3) examples are obtained directly via the scaled CG chord operators. We will add an explicit remark in the examples section noting that these polynomials have not been cross-checked against other methods and may contain extra factors, consistent with the su(2) precedent. This clarification will be included in the revised version. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Extension of CG chord formalism] The extension of the Clebsch-Gordan chord formalism from su_2 to arbitrary su_N (with indices 1 to N-1) is asserted but lacks a detailed justification or reference showing that the properties necessary for the scaling limit to produce the A-polynomial are preserved.

    Authors: The extension follows from the standard representation theory of U_q(su_N), where CG coefficients for the N-1 fundamental representations are defined via the quantum R-matrix and braiding relations, which are known to generalize directly. We will expand the relevant section with additional references to the quantum group literature (such as works on WZW models and quantum invariants) and a short argument showing that the commutation and scaling properties required for the ħ→0 limit carry over. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Proposed construction via double scaling limit is self-contained and definitional

full rationale

The paper explicitly frames its contribution as suggesting a construction of shaded A-polynomials for SU(N) by applying a double scaling limit (q = e^ℏ with ℏ → 0 and huge representations w_i → ∞ such that ℏ w_i ∼ m_i) to CG chord operators from U_q(su_N). This is motivated by the su_2 case via KCH but extended to higher rank without claiming an independent first-principles derivation that reduces back to the inputs. Explicit examples for knots 3_1, 4_1, 5_1 at su_3 are presented as outputs of this procedure. No load-bearing self-citations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-definitional loops are exhibited in the provided text; the central object is defined by the construction itself, which is grounded in the independently motivated quantum group and WZW formalism. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks for the proposed generalization.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on the extension of the CG chord formalism to su_N and the validity of the double scaling limit, which are postulated without detailed proof or independent evidence in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard properties of the quantum group U_q(su_N) and its Clebsch-Gordan coefficients
    Invoked to define CG chords and the double scaling limit with huge weights.
invented entities (2)
  • Shaded A-polynomials A_a(ℓ_b, m_c) no independent evidence
    purpose: Constraints on coordinates in SL(N,C) character varieties for knot complements
    Newly suggested generalization from the SU(2) case.
  • CG chords no independent evidence
    purpose: To label indices a, b, c running over 1 to N-1
    Introduced as natural objects in 2d CFT or quantum group representations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5982 in / 1662 out tokens · 67742 ms · 2026-05-22T04:41:09.883497+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 93 canonical work pages · 50 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Plane curves associated to character varieties of knot complements,

    D. Cooper, M. Culler, H. Gillet, D. D. Long, and P. B. Shalen, “Plane curves associated to character varieties of knot complements,”Inventiones Mathematicae118no. 1, (1994) 47–84

    work page 1994

  2. [2]

    The a-polynomial from the noncommutative viewpoint,

    C. Frohman, R. Gelca, and R. Litherland, “The a-polynomial from the noncommutative viewpoint,” 1998

    work page 1998

  3. [3]

    Three-Dimensional Quantum Gravity, Chern-Simons Theory, and the A-Polynomial

    S. Gukov, “Three-dimensional quantum gravity, Chern-Simons theory, and the A polynomial,”Commun. Math. Phys.255(2005) 577–627,arXiv:hep-th/0306165

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  4. [4]

    On the characteristic and deformation varieties of a knot,

    S. Garoufalidis, “On the characteristic and deformation varieties of a knot,” inProceedings of the Casson Fest, pp. 291–309, Mathematical Sciences Publishers. 2004

    work page 2004

  5. [5]

    The colored jones function is q-holonomic,

    S. Garoufalidis and T. T. Lˆ e, “The colored jones function is q-holonomic,”Geom. Topol.9no. 3, (2005) 1253–1293

    work page 2005

  6. [6]

    The non-commutative $A$-polynomial of twist knots

    S. Garoufalidis and X. Sun, “The non-commutative a-polynomial of twist knots,”J. Knot Theory Ramifications 19no. 12, (2010) 1571–1595,arXiv:0802.4074 [math.GT]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  7. [7]

    Super-A-polynomial for knots and BPS states

    H. Fuji, S. Gukov, and P. Su lkowski, “Super-a-polynomial for knots and bps states,”Nucl. Phys. B867no. 2, (2013) 506–546,arXiv:1205.1515 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  8. [8]

    Large N Duality, Mirror Symmetry, and a Q-deformed A-polynomial for Knots

    M. Aganagic and C. Vafa, “Large N Duality, Mirror Symmetry, and a Q-deformed A-polynomial for Knots,” arXiv:1204.4709 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  9. [9]

    Topological Strings, D-Model, and Knot Contact Homology

    M. Aganagic, T. Ekholm, L. Ng, and C. Vafa, “Topological Strings, D-Model, and Knot Contact Homology,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.18no. 4, (2014) 827–956,arXiv:1304.5778 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  10. [10]

    Nahm sums, quiver a-polynomials and topological recursion,

    H. Larragu´ ıvel, D. Noshchenko, M. Panfil, and P. Su lkowski, “Nahm sums, quiver a-polynomials and topological recursion,” 2020

    work page 2020

  11. [11]

    A two-variable series for knot complements,

    S. Gukov and C. Manolescu, “A two-variable series for knot complements,”Quantum Topol.12no. 1, (2021) 1–109,arXiv:1904.06057 [math.GT]

    work page arXiv 2021

  12. [12]

    Branches, quivers, and ideals for knot complements,

    T. Ekholm, L. Ng, and V. Shende, “Branches, quivers, and ideals for knot complements,”J. Eur. Math. Soc.25 no. 1, (2023) 1–55,arXiv:2110.13768 [math.GT]

    work page arXiv 2023

  13. [13]

    On geometric bases for quantum A-polynomials of knots,

    D. Galakhov and A. Morozov, “On geometric bases for quantum A-polynomials of knots,”Phys. Lett. B860 (2025) 139139,arXiv:2408.08181 [hep-th]. 31

    work page arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    On geometric bases for A-polynomials II:su3 and Kuperberg bracket,

    D. Galakhov and A. Morozov, “On geometric bases for A-polynomials II:su3 and Kuperberg bracket,”Eur. Phys. J. C85no. 8, (2025) 915,arXiv:2505.20260 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    The C-polynomial of a knot

    S. Garoufalidis, “The c-polynomial of a knot,”Algebr. Geom. Topol.6no. 3, (2006) 1623–1653, arXiv:math/0504305 [math.GT]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  16. [16]

    Algebra of quantum c-polynomials,

    A. Mironov and A. Morozov, “Algebra of quantum c-polynomials,”J. High Energy Phys.2020no. 2, (2020) 1–44,arXiv:1911.02160 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  17. [17]

    A new polynomial invariant of knots and links,

    P. Freyd, D. Yetter, J. Hoste, W. Lickorish, K. Millett, and A. Ocneanu, “A new polynomial invariant of knots and links,”Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society12no. 2, (1985) 239–246

    work page 1985

  18. [18]

    Invariants of links of Conway type

    J. H. Przytycki and P. Traczyk, “Invariants of links of conway type,”Kobe J. Math.4(1988) 115–139, arXiv:1610.06679 [math.GT]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1988

  19. [19]

    Quantization of Chern-Simons Gauge Theory With Complex Gauge Group,

    E. Witten, “Quantization of Chern-Simons Gauge Theory With Complex Gauge Group,”Commun. Math. Phys. 137(1991) 29–66

    work page 1991

  20. [20]

    Analytic Continuation Of Chern-Simons Theory

    E. Witten, “Analytic Continuation Of Chern-Simons Theory,”AMS/IP Stud. Adv. Math.50(2011) 347–446, arXiv:1001.2933 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  21. [21]

    The SL_3 Jones polynomial of the trefoil: a case study of $q$-holonomic sequences

    S. Garoufalidis and C. Koutschan, “The SL_3 Jones polynomial of the trefoil: a case study ofq-holonomic sequences,”arXiv:1011.6329 [math.GT]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  22. [22]

    Quantum groups,

    V. G. Drinfeld, “Quantum groups,”Zapiski Nauchnykh Seminarov POMI155(1986) 18–49

    work page 1986

  23. [23]

    Aq-difference analogue ofU(g)and the Yang-Baxter equation,

    M. Jimbo, “Aq-difference analogue ofU(g)and the Yang-Baxter equation,”Lett. Math. Phys.10no. 1, (1985) 63–69

    work page 1985

  24. [24]

    P. I. Etingof, I. Frenkel, and A. A. Kirillov,Lectures on representation theory and Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov equations. No. 58. American Mathematical Soc., 1998

    work page 1998

  25. [25]

    J. C. Jantzen,Lectures on Quantum Groups, vol. 6 ofGraduate Studies in Mathematics. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1996

    work page 1996

  26. [26]

    Invariants of knots and links at roots of unity,

    L. Bishler, A. Mironov, and A. Morozov, “Invariants of knots and links at roots of unity,”J. Geom. Phys.185 (2023) 104729,arXiv:2205.05650 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    Overview of Knot Invariants at Roots of Unity,

    L. Bishler, “Overview of Knot Invariants at Roots of Unity,”JETP Lett.116no. 3, (2022) 185–191, arXiv:2207.01882 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  28. [28]

    Universal R-matrix for quantized (super)algebras,

    S. M. Khoroshkin and V. N. Tolstoy, “Universal R-matrix for quantized (super)algebras,”Comm. Math. Phys. 141no. 3, (1991) 599–617

    work page 1991

  29. [29]

    Ribbon graphs and their invariants derived from quantum groups,

    N. Y. Reshetikhin and V. G. Turaev, “Ribbon graphs and their invariants derived from quantum groups,” Commun. Math. Phys.127(1990) 1–26

    work page 1990

  30. [30]

    Invariants of 3-manifolds via link polynomials and quantum groups,

    N. Y. Reshetikhin and V. G. Turaev, “Invariants of 3-manifolds via link polynomials and quantum groups,” Inventiones mathematicae103no. 1, (1991) 547–597. 32

    work page 1991

  31. [31]

    Character expansion for HOMFLY polynomials. II. Fundamental representation. Up to five strands in braid

    A. Mironov, A. Morozov, and A. Morozov, “Character expansion for HOMFLY polynomials. II. Fundamental representation. Up to five strands in braid,”JHEP03(2012) 034,arXiv:1112.2654 [math.QA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  32. [32]

    Colored HOMFLY polynomials of knots presented as double fat diagrams

    A. Mironov, A. Morozov, A. Morozov, P. Ramadevi, and V. K. Singh, “Colored HOMFLY polynomials of knots presented as double fat diagrams,”JHEP07(2015) 109,arXiv:1504.00371 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  33. [33]

    Towards effective topological field theory for knots

    A. Mironov and A. Morozov, “Towards effective topological field theory for knots,”Nucl. Phys. B899(2015) 395–413,arXiv:1506.00339 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  34. [34]

    Planar decomposition of the HOMFLY polynomial for bipartite knots and links,

    A. Anokhina, E. Lanina, and A. Morozov, “Planar decomposition of the HOMFLY polynomial for bipartite knots and links,”Eur. Phys. J. C84no. 9, (2024) 990,arXiv:2407.08724 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    Colored knot polynomials for Pretzel knots and links of arbitrary genus

    D. Galakhov, D. Melnikov, A. Mironov, A. Morozov, and A. Sleptsov, “Colored knot polynomials for arbitrary pretzel knots and links,”Phys. Lett. B743(2015) 71–74,arXiv:1412.2616 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  36. [36]

    Representations of the algebrauq(sl(2)),q-orthogonal polynomials and invariants of links,

    A. N. Kirillov and N. Y. Reshetikhin, “Representations of the algebrauq(sl(2)),q-orthogonal polynomials and invariants of links,” inInfinite Dimensional Lie Algebras and Groups, vol. 7 ofAdv. Ser. Math. Phys., pp. 285–337. World Scientific, Singapore, 1989

    work page 1989

  37. [37]

    Multiplicity-free products and restrictions of Weyl characters,

    J. R. Stembridge, “Multiplicity-free products and restrictions of Weyl characters,”Representation Theory7 (2003) 404–439

    work page 2003

  38. [38]

    Introduction to Non-Linear Algebra

    V. Dolotin and A. Morozov, “Introduction to Non-Linear Algebra,”arXiv:hep-th/0609022

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  39. [39]

    ¨Uber die freie ¨ aquivalenz der geschlossenen Z¨ opfe,

    A. A. Markov, “¨Uber die freie ¨ aquivalenz der geschlossenen Z¨ opfe,”Recueil Math´ ematique Moscou (Matematicheskii Sbornik)1(43)no. 1, (1936) 73–78

    work page 1936

  40. [40]

    J. S. Birman,Braids, Links, and Mapping Class Groups, vol. 82 ofAnnals of Mathematics Studies. Princeton University Press, 1974

    work page 1974

  41. [41]

    Knot contact homology

    T. Ekholm, J. B. Etnyre, L. Ng, and M. G. Sullivan, “Knot contact homology,”Geometry & Topology17no. 2, (2013) 975–1112,arXiv:1109.1542 [math.SG]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  42. [42]

    Framed knot contact homology

    L. Ng, “Framed knot contact homology,”Duke Mathematical Journal141no. 2, (2008) 365–406, arXiv:math/0407071 [math.GT]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  43. [43]

    Knot and braid invariants from contact homology I

    L. Ng, “Knot and braid invariants from contact homology I,”Geometry & Topology9(2005) 247–297, arXiv:math/0302099 [math.GT]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  44. [44]

    Knot and braid invariants from contact homology II, with an appendix written jointly with Siddhartha Gadgil

    L. Ng, “Knot and braid invariants from contact homology II,”Geometry & Topology9(2005) 1603–1637, arXiv:math/0303343 [math.GT]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  45. [45]

    The worldsheet skein D-module and basic curves on Lagrangian fillings of the Hopf link conormal,

    T. Ekholm, P. Longhi, and L. Nakamura, “The worldsheet skein D-module and basic curves on Lagrangian fillings of the Hopf link conormal,”arXiv:2407.09836 [math.SG]

    work page arXiv

  46. [46]

    Open strings on knot complements,

    S. Chauhan, T. Ekholm, and P. Longhi, “Open strings on knot complements,”arXiv:2601.22922 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  47. [47]

    A topological introduction to knot contact homology

    L. Ng, “A topological introduction to knot contact homology,”Bolyai Society Mathematical Studies26(2014) 485–530,arXiv:1210.4803 [math.GT]. 33

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  48. [48]

    Legendrian Submanifolds in $R^{2n+1}$ and Contact Homology

    T. Ekholm, J. Etnyre, and M. Sullivan, “The contact homology of Legendrian submanifolds inR2n+1,”J. Differential Geom.71no. 2, (2005) 177–305,arXiv:math/0210124 [math.SG]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  49. [49]

    Morse flow trees and Legendrian contact homology in 1-jet spaces

    T. Ekholm, “Morse flow trees and Legendrian contact homology in 1-jet spaces,”Geom. Topol.11no. 2, (2007) 1083–1224,arXiv:math/0509386 [math.SG]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  50. [50]

    Quantum field theory and the Jones polynomial,

    E. Witten, “Quantum field theory and the Jones polynomial,”Communications in Mathematical Physics121 no. 3, (1989) 351–399

    work page 1989

  51. [51]

    Moore and N

    G. Moore and N. Seiberg,Lectures on RCFT. World Scientific., 1990

    work page 1990

  52. [52]

    Current algebra and Wess-Zumino model in two dimensions,

    V. G. Knizhnik and A. B. Zamolodchikov, “Current algebra and Wess-Zumino model in two dimensions,” Nuclear Physics B247no. 1, (1984) 83–103

    work page 1984

  53. [53]

    P. D. Francesco, P. Mathieu, and D. S´ en´ echal,Conformal Field Theory. Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics. Springer, New York, 1997

    work page 1997

  54. [54]

    The classical limit of quantum partition functions,

    B. Simon, “The classical limit of quantum partition functions,”Communications in Mathematical Physics71 no. 3, (1980) 247–276

    work page 1980

  55. [55]

    Coherent states for arbitrary Lie group

    A. M. Perelomov, “Coherent states for arbitrary Lie group,”Comm. Math. Phys.26no. 3, (1972) 222–236, arXiv:math-ph/0203002 [math-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1972

  56. [56]

    Perelomov,Coherent States and the Quasiclassical Limit, pp

    A. Perelomov,Coherent States and the Quasiclassical Limit, pp. 256–259. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1986

    work page 1986

  57. [57]

    Exact WKB methods in SU(2) Nf = 1,

    A. Grassi, Q. Hao, and A. Neitzke, “Exact WKB methods in SU(2) Nf = 1,”JHEP01(2022) 046, arXiv:2105.03777 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  58. [58]

    Hollands and A

    L. Hollands and A. Neitzke, “Exact WKB and abelianization for theT3 equation,”Commun. Math. Phys.380 no. 1, (2020) 131–186,arXiv:1906.04271 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  59. [59]

    Liouville Blocks from Spectral Networks

    L. Hollands and S. Murugesan, “Liouville Blocks from Spectral Networks,”arXiv:2604.25463 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  60. [60]

    Wall-crossing, Hitchin Systems, and the WKB Approximation

    D. Gaiotto, G. W. Moore, and A. Neitzke, “Wall-crossing, Hitchin systems, and the WKB approximation,”Adv. Math.234(2013) 239–403,arXiv:0907.3987 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  61. [61]

    Framed BPS States

    D. Gaiotto, G. W. Moore, and A. Neitzke, “Framed BPS states,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.17(2013) 241–361, arXiv:1006.0146 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  62. [62]

    Wall-Crossing in Coupled 2d-4d Systems

    D. Gaiotto, G. W. Moore, and A. Neitzke, “Wall-crossing in coupled 2d-4d systems,”JHEP12(2012) 082, arXiv:1103.2598 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  63. [63]

    Spectral networks

    D. Gaiotto, G. W. Moore, and A. Neitzke, “Spectral networks,”Ann. Henri Poincar´ e14(2013) 1643–1731, arXiv:1204.4824 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  64. [64]

    Spectral Networks and Snakes

    D. Gaiotto, G. W. Moore, and A. Neitzke, “Spectral networks and snakes,”Ann. Henri Poincar´ e15(2014) 61–141,arXiv:1209.0866 [hep-th]. 34

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  65. [65]

    Wall Crossing Invariants: from quantum mechanics to knots

    D. Galakhov, A. Mironov, and A. Morozov, “Wall Crossing Invariants: from quantum mechanics to knots,”J. Exp. Theor. Phys.120no. 3, (2015) 549–577,arXiv:1410.8482 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  66. [66]

    Knot invariants from Virasoro related representation and pretzel knots

    D. Galakhov, D. Melnikov, A. Mironov, and A. Morozov, “Knot invariants from Virasoro related representation and pretzel knots,”Nucl. Phys. B899(2015) 194–228,arXiv:1502.02621 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  67. [67]

    SU(2)/SL(2) knot invariants and KS monodromies

    D. Galakhov, A. Mironov, and A. Morozov, “SU(2)/SL(2) knot invariants and Kontsevich–Soibelman monodromies,”Theor. Math. Phys.187no. 2, (2016) 678–694,arXiv:1510.05366 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  68. [68]

    Interplay between symmetries of quantum 6j-symbols and the eigenvalue hypothesis,

    V. Alekseev, A. Morozov, and A. Sleptsov, “Interplay between symmetries of quantum 6j-symbols and the eigenvalue hypothesis,”Lett. Math. Phys.111no. 2, (2021) 50,arXiv:1909.07601 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  69. [69]

    Multiplicity-freeUq(slN)6-j symbols: Relations, asymptotics, symmetries,

    V. Alekseev, A. Morozov, and A. Sleptsov, “Multiplicity-freeUq(slN)6-j symbols: Relations, asymptotics, symmetries,”Nucl. Phys. B960(2020) 115164,arXiv:1912.13325 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  70. [70]

    Wess-zumino-witten model as a theory of free fields,

    A. Gerasimov, A. Morozov, M. Olshanetsky, A. Marshakov, and S. Shatashvili, “Wess-zumino-witten model as a theory of free fields,”International Journal of Modern Physics A05no. 13, (1990) 2495–2589

    work page 1990

  71. [71]

    Conformal blocks as Dotsenko-Fateev Integral Discriminants

    A. Mironov, A. Morozov, and S. Shakirov, “Conformal blocks as Dotsenko-Fateev Integral Discriminants,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. A25(2010) 3173–3207,arXiv:1001.0563 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  72. [72]

    Conformal algebra and multipoint correlation functions in 2d statistical models,

    V. S. Dotsenko and V. A. Fateev, “Conformal algebra and multipoint correlation functions in 2d statistical models,”Nuclear Physics B240no. 3, (1984) 312–348

    work page 1984

  73. [73]

    The matrix model version of AGT conjecture and CIV-DV prepotential

    A. Morozov and S. Shakirov, “The matrix model version of AGT conjecture and CIV-DV prepotential,”JHEP 08(2010) 066,arXiv:1004.2917 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  74. [74]

    Resolvents and Seiberg-Witten representation for Gaussian beta-ensemble

    A. Mironov, A. Morozov, A. Popolitov, and S. Shakirov, “Resolvents and Seiberg-Witten representation for Gaussian beta-ensemble,”Theor. Math. Phys.171(2012) 505–522,arXiv:1103.5470 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  75. [75]

    A direct proof of AGT conjecture at beta = 1

    A. Mironov, A. Morozov, and S. Shakirov, “A direct proof of AGT conjecture at beta = 1,”JHEP02(2011) 067,arXiv:1012.3137 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  76. [76]

    A. B. Zamolodchikov and A. B. Zamolodchikov,Conformal Field Theory and Critical Phenomena in Two-Dimensional Systems. Harwood Academic Publishers, 1989. Soviet Scientific Reviews, Section A: Physics Reviews, Vol. 10, Part 4

    work page 1989

  77. [77]

    Liouville Correlation Functions from Four-dimensional Gauge Theories

    L. F. Alday, D. Gaiotto, and Y. Tachikawa, “Liouville correlation functions from four-dimensional gauge theories,”Lett. Math. Phys.91(2010) 167–197,arXiv:0906.3219 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  78. [78]

    Exact Results for Perturbative Chern-Simons Theory with Complex Gauge Group

    T. Dimofte, S. Gukov, J. Lenells, and D. Zagier, “Exact Results for Perturbative Chern-Simons Theory with Complex Gauge Group,”Commun. Num. Theor. Phys.3(2009) 363–443,arXiv:0903.2472 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  79. [79]

    Knot Invariants from Four-Dimensional Gauge Theory

    D. Gaiotto and E. Witten, “Knot Invariants from Four-Dimensional Gauge Theory,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 16no. 3, (2012) 935–1086,arXiv:1106.4789 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  80. [80]

    3d N=2 Theories from Cluster Algebras

    Y. Terashima and M. Yamazaki, “3d N=2 Theories from Cluster Algebras,”PTEP2014(2014) 023B01, arXiv:1301.5902 [hep-th]. 35

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

Showing first 80 references.