pith. sign in

arxiv: 2412.06849 · v1 · pith:3C5RZIWOnew · submitted 2024-12-08 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.AI· cs.CL

GL-Fusion: Rethinking the Combination of Graph Neural Network and Large Language model

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CL
keywords graphmodelsgnn-centeredlanguagetasksachievesapproachesdata
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Recent research on integrating Large Language Models (LLMs) with Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) typically follows two approaches: LLM-centered models, which convert graph data into tokens for LLM processing, and GNN-centered models, which use LLMs to encode text features into node and edge representations for GNN input. LLM-centered models often struggle to capture graph structures effectively, while GNN-centered models compress variable-length textual data into fixed-size vectors, limiting their ability to understand complex semantics. Additionally, GNN-centered approaches require converting tasks into a uniform, manually-designed format, restricting them to classification tasks and preventing language output. To address these limitations, we introduce a new architecture that deeply integrates GNN with LLM, featuring three key innovations: (1) Structure-Aware Transformers, which incorporate GNN's message-passing capabilities directly into LLM's transformer layers, allowing simultaneous processing of textual and structural information and generating outputs from both GNN and LLM; (2) Graph-Text Cross-Attention, which processes full, uncompressed text from graph nodes and edges, ensuring complete semantic integration; and (3) GNN-LLM Twin Predictor, enabling LLM's flexible autoregressive generation alongside GNN's scalable one-pass prediction. GL-Fusion achieves outstand performance on various tasks. Notably, it achieves state-of-the-art performance on OGBN-Arxiv and OGBG-Code2.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. LLM Features Can Hurt GNNs: Concatenation Interference on Homophilous Graph Benchmarks

    cs.LG 2026-06 accept novelty 7.0

    Pure concatenation of LLM features degrades GNN accuracy on homophilous datasets, with Delta_sig metric predicting when the drop occurs better than homophily.