Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Low mechanical loss TiO₂:GeO₂ coatings for reduced thermal noise in Gravitational Wave Interferometers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2108.04954 v2 pith:3CM42NP4 submitted 2021-08-10 physics.ins-det cond-mat.mtrl-scigr-qc

Low mechanical loss TiO₂:GeO₂ coatings for reduced thermal noise in Gravitational Wave Interferometers

classification physics.ins-det cond-mat.mtrl-scigr-qc
keywords noisethermallevelmirrorsbrowniancoatingsdetectorsdioxide
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The sensitivity of current and planned gravitational wave interferometric detectors is limited, in the most critical frequency region around 100 Hz, by a combination of quantum noise and thermal noise. The latter is dominated by Brownian noise: thermal motion originating from the elastic energy dissipation in the dielectric coatings used in the interferometer mirrors. The energy dissipation is a material property characterized by the mechanical loss angle. We have identified mixtures of titanium dioxide (TiO$_2$) and germanium dioxide (GeO$_2$) that show internal dissipations at a level of 1 $\times 10^{-4}$, low enough to provide almost a factor of two improvement on the level of Brownian noise with respect to the state-of-the-art materials. We show that by using a mixture of 44% TiO$_2$ and 56% GeO$_2$ in the high refractive index layers of the interferometer mirrors, it would be possible to achieve a thermal noise level in line with the design requirements. These results are a crucial step forward to produce the mirrors needed to meet the thermal noise requirements for the planned upgrades of the Advanced LIGO and Virgo detectors.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.