Highly Entangled Quantum Spin Chains on Fermat's Spiral

Olai B. Mykland; Zhao Zhang

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 34 references

Highly Entangled Quantum Spin Chains on Fermat's Spiral

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Coiling a single exactly solvable Motzkin spin chain into a spiral on a square lattice yields a frustration-free 2D Hamiltonian whose ground state has volume-law entanglement across every central cut, from two-body interactions alone.

desk verdict A genuinely simpler 2D construction of a volume-law state, but the entanglement scalings at and below the critical point are not derived correctly. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.02103 v4 pith:3CMY2O7I submitted 2025-06-02 quant-ph cond-mat.stat-mechmath-phmath.MP

Zhao Zhang , Olai B. Mykland This is my paper

classification quant-phcond-mat.stat-mechmath-phmath.MP MSC 81P4082B2082B26 PACS 03.67.Mn75.10.Jm

keywords entanglemententropyvolume-lawarealawviolationMotzkinchainfrustration-freeHamiltonianspectralgaptensornetworkphasetransition

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to show that a two-dimensional quantum spin system can violate the entanglement area law with much simpler ingredients than previously thought possible. Its construction takes one exactly solvable one-dimensional object, the deformed bicolor Motzkin chain whose ground state is a weighted superposition of random walks, and coils it into a spiral path that winds once through the square lattice, twisted around the lattice center. The resulting Hamiltonian is frustration-free — every local two-body term is minimized by the same state — and in its strongly deformed phase the unique ground state has entanglement entropy that grows with the volume of the region, not its boundary, for cuts through the center in any direction. The paper also maps an entanglement phase transition in the deformation strength, with critical and weakly entangled phases whose scalings differ from earlier coupled-chain constructions, a faster closing of the spectral gap in the volume-law phase, and a tensor network made of lower-rank tensors. If the construction holds up, the minimal local ingredient for 2D area-law violation is a twisted one-dimensional chain rather than genuinely two-dimensional vertex or tiling couplings.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the twisted bicolor Motzkin chain: the $q$-deformed Motzkin spin chain, whose ground state superposes Motzkin paths with weight $q^{\text{area}}$, laid along a spiral Hamiltonian path through the square lattice so that couplings point along different lattice directions in the four quadrants. The entanglement counting uses the Schmidt decomposition — the standard splitting of the state into correlated pieces across the cut — into a color sector and a height-fluctuation sector; the color sector contributes $\log 2$ times the total net height change of the chain segments lying on one side of the cut. For the symmetric central cuts, those segments alternate between the first and second halves of the chain, so the alternating sum telescopes to the average height at the midpoint of the chain, and the known asymptotics of that height — $\sqrt{N}$ at $q=1$, linear in $N$ for $q>1$, bounded for $q<1$, with $N\sim L^{2}$ — become the $L$, $L^{2}$, and $O(1)$ entanglement scalings. The spectral-gap results are upper bounds transferred from the one-dimensional chain by substituting its length $N=L(L+2)$, and the tensor-network section builds new rank-four tiles whose valid tilings correspond one-to-one to the Dyck walks (nonnegative up-down paths) in the ground state, yielding an upright-pyramid network that is sparser on even and odd sites.

What would settle it

Compute the genuine bipartite von Neumann entropy of the 2D ground state — the entropy of the reduced density matrix for one side of a central cut, not the height-difference estimate of Eq. (9) — for system sizes from $L=8$ up to about $L=30$ in each phase, by exact tensor-network contraction or by enumerating the Motzkin-path segments described in Appendix A, and fit the exponent. If the $q>1$ entropy does not scale as $L^{2}$, or the $q=1$ entropy grows faster than linearly in $L$, the telescoping-height argument that carries the paper's central claim is wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a frustration-free Hamiltonian on an $L\times L$ square lattice, with two-body interactions acting only along the bonds of an $L(L+2)$-site bicolor Motzkin chain wound into a spiral from the lattice center, has an exactly solvable unique ground state whose entanglement is tunable through a phase transition. Across any of the four symmetric bipartitions through the center, the leading, color-sector contribution to the entanglement entropy scales as $L^{2}$ for deformation parameter $q>1$, as $L$ at the critical point $q=1$, and as a constant for $q<1$; since $L^{2}$ is the volume of half the system, the strongly deformed ground state violates the two-dimensional area law even though every interaction term touches only two spins, whereas the earlier coupled-chain constructions needed four- or six-body vertex and tiling terms. The same twist, the paper argues, induces antiferromagnetic spin order in the radial direction, makes the spectral gap close faster with $L$ than in the coupled-chain models even where the entanglement scalings agree, and admits a holographic tensor network of rank-four tensors whose global pyramid geometry matches the coupled-chain network with fewer internal legs.

Load-bearing premise

The entanglement scaling of the 2D model rests on the heuristic step that, when the spiral chain is cut into many alternating pieces, the entanglement is set by the pieces' net height changes, which telescope to the height at the middle of the chain, rather than by their absolute height changes; the paper flags a rigorous estimation of this multi-segment structure as an open challenge.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Two-body interactions suffice to make a frustration-free 2D ground state that violates the area law: the twisted-chain Hamiltonian's local terms touch only two spins, while the coupled-chain benchmarks require four- or six-body vertex and tiling terms.
The entanglement phase transition survives the twist but changes its fingerprints: at $q=1$ the twisted model's entropy scales as $L$ (an area law) rather than $L\log L$, and for $q<1$ it saturates to $O(1)$ rather than growing as $L$, even though both constructions reach the same $L^{2}$ volume law for $q>1$.
Entanglement and spectral gap decouple: with the same $L^{2}$ volume-law entanglement as the coupled chains, the twisted model's gap closes faster, as $e^{-\beta L^{4}}$ compared with $e^{-\alpha L^{3}}$ in the colored $q>1$ phase.
The twist recipe is portable: the same construction can be applied to other 1D chains with a height-function description, and the spiral layout generalizes to two highly entangled 1D chains coupled by a quantum junction at the center.
The new tensor network gives a sparser exact representation of the entangled ground state — rank-four tensors with four internal legs instead of six, built from four tiles on even and odd sites instead of five — while preserving the global pyramid geometry of the coupled-chain network.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Beyond the paper: the construction suggests a general recipe — any 1D state whose bipartite entanglement is governed by a single midpoint height should inherit a 2D volume-law ground state from the same spiral twist, with the number of colors changing prefactors but not scalings.
Beyond the paper: because the spiral couplings are anisotropic by quadrant, adding weak couplings between adjacent turns of the spiral would test how fragile the volume-law entanglement is to genuinely 2D perturbations; the paper's model has no such inter-arc couplings, so this robustness question is open.
Beyond the paper: the faster gap closure ($e^{-\beta L^{4}}$) suggests the twisted construction sits further from a local classical description in the entangled phase than the coupled-chain models do; one concrete probe would be comparing the cost of classically simulating the ground state through its tensor network between the two constructions.
Beyond the paper: the quantum-junction generalization suggests a modular construction — several spirals joined at a central point — whose entanglement would concentrate where the chains meet; computing its scaling would be a natural next step.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Colleague,

The headline is simple: the twisted spiral construction is a real and useful idea, and the q>1 volume-law result is solid. But the paper's entanglement scalings at q=1 and q<1 are in trouble, and the authors need to fix the derivation before these numbers are quoted.

The good part first. Replacing the coupled-chain arrays with a single Motzkin chain that fills the lattice along a spiral gives a Hamiltonian with two-body interactions, which is a genuine simplification over earlier four- and six-body constructions. For q>1, the ground state is effectively a rigid mountain, the paths do not fluctuate, and the number of Bell pairs across the central cuts is read off from the height at the middle of the chain. The expectation-value formula and the substitution N=L(L+2) are both fine there. The new upright-pyramid tensor network for the Fredkin chain in Sec. 5 also seems original and useful, with lower-rank tensors.

The soft spot is the multi-segment entanglement estimate. The paper uses Eq. (8)/(A.5), which telescopes to the height at the middle of the chain, for all phases. But that telescoping only works when the height is monotone along each half of the chain—true for q>1, not true for q=1 or q<1. For a fluctuating path, the color-sector entanglement is the path-wise sum of absolute height changes over the A segments, not the sum of the expected absolute changes. For q=1 the typical fluctuation over a segment of length ~L is ~√L, with O(L) segments, so the color entropy is plausibly ~L^{3/2}, not L. For q<1, the ground state is a gapped MPS; a subsystem with O(L) disconnected intervals in the chain can carry O(L) entropy, so the claimed O(1) is not consistent with the structure of the state. The inconsistency between Eq. (9) (absolute value, which would give O(L) for q<1) and Eq. (A.5) (signed sum) is a symptom of the same problem.

This does not kill the paper. The q>1 volume law and the simpler two-body mechanism are intact. But the phase-transition scalings in Table 1 and the claims about behavior at the critical point and in the weakly entangled phase are not supported. The authors should either prove the multi-segment decomposition carefully or restrict the claims to q>1.

Who gets value: anyone working on 2D area-law violations and exactly solvable Hamiltonians will want to know about the spiral construction, but should be cautious about the critical and weak-coupling results. I'd send it to a referee, with the expectation that the EE scaling sections need revision. I would not cite the q=1 and q<1 numbers until they are fixed.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a frustration-free Hamiltonian on a square lattice whose two-body interactions follow a spiral (Fermat-spiral-like) path, embedding a q-deformed bicolor Motzkin chain in 2D. The ground state is exactly solvable as a weighted superposition of Motzkin paths, and the paper claims that across any central bipartition the entanglement entropy scales as L^2 for q>1 (volume law), as L at the critical point q=1 (area law), and as O(1) for q<1 (sub-area law), with corresponding changes in the spectral gap. The paper also reports antiferromagnetic order in the radial direction and gives a tensor-network representation of the ground state with lower-rank tensors than earlier coupled-chain constructions.

Significance. The main constructive idea—a space-filling twisted Motzkin chain whose ground state has volume-law entanglement across central cuts in a 2D lattice—is a potentially significant simplification over prior coupled-chain models that require four- or six-body interactions. The exact solvability is a genuine strength: the ground state is the known q-deformed bicolor Motzkin state, and the mechanism for the q>1 volume law (reflection-symmetric Bell pairing of the dominant mountain path) is transparent and parameter-free. The tensor-network section also offers a concrete, lower-rank representation. However, the paper's additional claims about an entanglement phase transition with a sub-area O(1) weakly entangled phase and an area-law critical point are not supported by the derivation as written; these claims are load-bearing for the paper's stated message and need to be either proved or corrected. Because the q>1 volume law appears robust, the appropriate route is a major revision rather than rejection.

major comments (3)

[Sec. 3, Eqs. (8)–(9) and Appendix A, Eq. (A.5)] The two analytic estimates of the bipartite entanglement entropy are mutually inconsistent. Eq. (9) sums |⟨h_f^s−h_i^s⟩| over all segments in one subsystem, which for the q<1 phase contributes O(1) per segment and hence O(L) in total; Eq. (8) and the second line of Eq. (A.5) instead use a signed telescoping sum that reduces to ⟨h_{L/2}⟩=O(1). The text states that Eq. (9) 'is identical with the first form of Eq. (A.5)', but the first and second forms of Eq. (A.5) are not equal in general: the replacement of the absolute value by the signed sum assumes a sign pattern that holds for the rigid q>1 mountain profile, not for typical q≤1 paths. This internal contradiction directly affects the q=1 and q<1 rows of Table 1 and needs to be resolved.
[Sec. 3, Eqs. (5)–(7)] The derivation of ⟨S_c⟩=log2 ∑_s |δh_s| assumes p_{c|δh}=∏_s 2^{-δh_s}, i.e., that every segment's net height change is realized as color Bell pairs with the complementary subsystem. For a fixed Motzkin path this need not hold: matched up–down pairs can connect two segments inside the same subsystem, or can cross the cut in numbers unrelated to the net height changes of individual segments. At q=1 the typical path-wise height difference over a segment of length ℓ∼L is of order √ℓ, much larger than the mean difference |⟨h_f⟩−⟨h_i⟩| used in Eq. (9); hence the mean-height estimate can severely underestimate the color-sector entanglement. A correct treatment requires the path-wise joint distribution of segment height changes, which Eq. (A.6) sets up but does not evaluate.
[Sec. 3, Fig. 2] The numerical evidence for the q≤1 rows is the MPS evaluation of Eq. (9), not a computation of the Schmidt entropy of the reduced density matrix. The plotted quantity is therefore the heuristic mean-height estimator, and the fits (e.g., S∼L^0.01 for q=0.99) do not by themselves establish the entanglement-entropy scaling. For the q<1 phase, a physical additivity argument gives instead S=O(L) for a gapped 1D chain cut into O(L) disjoint intervals; the O(1) entry in Table 1 is thus unlikely to survive a direct Schmidt-decomposition calculation. Please provide either a direct small-system Schmidt-entropy computation for the 2D bipartition or a rigorous bound relating Eq. (9) to the true entanglement entropy.

minor comments (3)

[Sec. 5, Eq. (11)] The text refers to 'The indices k_1,...,k_4 of A(q)', but the tensor defined in Eq. (11) is called B(q); please harmonize the notation.
[References] References [25] and [26] are the same paper by Pronko; one of the two citations should be removed.
[Table 2] The header 'uncouples chains' should read 'uncoupled chains'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the twisted-chain EE scalings are derived from prior established Motzkin-chain height asymptotics and are not fitted to the target entanglement claims.

full rationale

The derivation chain is: define a frustration-free Hamiltonian whose unique GS is the q-deformed bicolor Motzkin superposition; map a 2D bipartition cut to alternating segments of the underlying 1D chain; then use the known asymptotic height scalings of the Motzkin chain (⟨h_k⟩ ~ √k at q=1, ~k for q>1, O(1) for q<1) from Refs. [15,16] to estimate the color contribution to the EE via Eqs. (7)-(9). No free parameter is fitted to the claimed scalings, and Eq. (9) is explicitly presented as an estimator, not an identity that defines the answer. The paper also openly acknowledges the rigor gap in Appendix A ('we point out the challenge of a rigorous estimation'), which is a limitation but not a circular reduction. Many references include the current authors, but the cited 1D results were independently derived and numerically checked in prior work, and the new geometric mapping from 2D cuts to chain segments is not defined in terms of the volume-law conclusion. Concerns that Eq. (9) conflates mean height differences with the actual Schmidt entropy, or that the q=1 and q<1 rows are unsupported, are correctness or rigor objections rather than evidence that the paper's input and output are equivalent by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented entities. The paper uses known Motzkin chain results as input; the new content is the spatial embedding and the TN construction.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption The ground state of the q-deformed bicolor Motzkin chain is a weighted superposition of Motzkin paths with weight q^{area} (Refs [15,16]).
Used in Sec. 3 as the starting point for EE analysis.
domain assumption The asymptotic height scaling of the Motzkin chain: ⟨h_k⟩ ~ sqrt(k) for q=1, ~ k for q>1, and O(1) for q<1 (from Refs [15,16,30]).
Used in Sec. 3 to derive EE scalings via Eq. (8).
domain assumption The 1D spectral gap of the area-weighted Motzkin chain is exponentially small in N^2 for q>1, polynomial in N at q=1, and O(1) for q<1 (Refs [17,34,35]).
Used in Sec. 3 to derive Table 2 by substituting N=L(L+2).
domain assumption The entanglement entropy of the Motzkin GS decomposes into a color contribution proportional to net height change and a subleading height-fluctuation contribution (Refs [11,15]).
Used in Sec. 3 and Appendix A to estimate EE from height changes.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Highly Entangled Quantum Spin Chains on Fermat's Spiral." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3CMY2O7I

@misc{pith2026250602103,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Highly Entangled Quantum Spin Chains on Fermat's Spiral},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3CMY2O7I}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.02103}
}

read the original abstract

We investigate the entanglement entropy (EE) and spectral gap properties of highly entangled spin chains arranged along a Hamiltonian path on a two-dimensional (2D) lattice with geometries reminiscent of Fermat's spiral. Interpreting the interactions along the spin chain as the strongly anisotropic limit of a 2D model, with couplings oriented along different directions in different quadrants, we construct an exactly solvable ground state (GS) that exhibits volume scaling of EE across bipartition through the center in any direction. This provides another mechanism for realizing 2D GSs with local interactions that violate the entanglement area law. As in the previously studied coupled-chains paradigm, the new construction features an entanglement phase transition, but with distinct scaling at the critical point and in the weakly entangled phase, and a faster closing of the spectral gap in the highly entangled phase. The corresponding tensor network representation uses lower-rank tensors while preserving a global geometry similar to that of coupled-chains model. Finally, the Fermat-spiral layout naturally generalizes to two highly entangled 1D chains coupled by a quantum junction at the center of the 2D system.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.02103 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** (a) A square lattice with L(L + 1) spins on the vertices. (b) An L × L square lattice with spins on the edges of the square lattice that are covered by a Motzkin chain of length 2N = L(L + 2), both shown here for L = 8. Four symmetric bipartition cuts are shown in different colors. (c) The two subsystems resulting from the yellow cut in (b). The northeast subsystem is represented with the thickened black lines, wher… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Scaling of the bipartite EE S computed from Eq. (9) and the MPS representation of the GS for various linear system sizes L and for the different colored cuts in Fig. (1) (a). In (a) q = 0.99, in (b) q = 1 and in (c) q = 1.01. where Scut contains all segments in one of subsystems defined by one of the colored cuts in Fig. (1) (a) and h s i (resp. h s f ) is the height at the beginning (resp. end) of the segment s. Fo… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Order parameter ⟨S z ⟩ for (a) q > 1, and (b) q = 1. Warm color and cold colors denote respective spin up and down, and darker colors correspond to larger magnitude. The neutral muted shade represents 2D lattice sites not occupied by degrees of freedom of the 1D chain. vertical in the east and west quadrant, and horizontal in the north and south quadrant. So the system indeed interact in both directions, leading to … view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (3 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: (a) TN representation of the 2D GS of the twisted Motzkin chain, where [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: (a) The five different tiles Bi(c) for the new Fredkin tensor network. The tiles are also defined as rank-4 tensors in terms of Kronecker deltas, where the indices ki are defined as for B(q) in panel (d). We have c = (1, 0) for red arrow, c = (0, 1) for blue arrow. No …

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: The number of segments of Motzkin paths that start at height [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages

[1]

D. N. Page,Average entropy of a subsystem, Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 1291 (1993), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1291

doi:10.1103/physrevlett.71.1291 1993
[2]

Eisert, M

J. Eisert, M. Cramer and M. B. Plenio,Colloquium: Area laws for the entanglement entropy, Reviews of Modern Physics82(1), 277–306 (2010), doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.277

doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.277 2010
[3]

M.B.HastingsandT.Koma,Spectral gap and exponential decay of correlations, Com- munications in Mathematical Physics265(3), 781–804 (2006), doi:10.1007/s00220- 006-0030-4

doi:10.1007/s00220- 2006
[4]

Anshu, I

A. Anshu, I. Arad and D. Gosset,An area law for 2d frustration-free spin systems, In Proceedings of the 54th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC ’22. ACM, doi:10.1145/3519935.3519962 (2022)

arXiv 2022
[5]

Holzhey, F

C. Holzhey, F. Larsen and F. Wilczek,Geometric and renormalized en- tropy in conformal field theory, Nuclear Physics B424(3), 443 (1994), doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(94)90402-2

doi:10.1016/0550-3213(94)90402-2 1994
[7]

Gioev and I

D. Gioev and I. Klich,Entanglement entropy of fermions in any di- mension and the widom conjecture, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 100503 (2006), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.100503. 15 SciPost Physics Submission

doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.100503 2006
[8]

Vitagliano, A

G. Vitagliano, A. Riera and J. I. Latorre,Volume-law scaling for the entangle- ment entropy in spin-1/2 chains, New Journal of Physics12(11), 113049 (2010), doi:10.1088/1367-2630/12/11/113049

work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/12/11/113049 2010
[9]

Ramírez, J

G. Ramírez, J. Rodríguez-Laguna and G. Sierra,From conformal to volume law for the entanglement entropy in exponentially deformed critical spin 1/2 chains, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2014(10), P10004 (2014), doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2014/10/P10004

work page doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2014/10/p10004 2014

Show all 34 references

[10]

Ramírez, J

G. Ramírez, J. Rodríguez-Laguna and G. Sierra,Entanglement over the rainbow, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2015(6), P06002 (2015), doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2015/06/P06002

2015 doi
[11]

Bravyi, L

S. Bravyi, L. Caha, R. Movassagh, D. Nagaj and P. W. Shor,Criticality with- out frustration for quantum spin-1 chains, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 207202 (2012), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.207202

2012 doi
[12]

Movassagh and P

R. Movassagh and P. W. Shor,Supercritical entanglement in local systems: Coun- terexample to the area law for quantum matter, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences113(47), 13278 (2016), doi:10.1073/pnas.1605716113

2016 doi
[13]

Dell’Anna, O

L. Dell’Anna, O. Salberger, L. Barbiero, A. Trombettoni and V. E. Korepin,Violation of cluster decomposition and absence of light cones in local integer and half-integer spin chains, Phys. Rev. B94, 155140 (2016), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.94.155140

2016 doi
[14]

Salberger and V

O. Salberger and V. Korepin,Fredkin Spin Chain, pp. 439–458, WORLD SCIEN- TIFIC, doi:10.1142/9789813233867_0022 (2018)

2018 doi
[15]

Zhang, A

Z. Zhang, A. Ahmadain and I. Klich,Novel quantum phase transition from bounded to extensive entanglement, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences114(20), 5142 (2017), doi:10.1073/pnas.1702029114

2017 doi
[16]

Salberger, T

O. Salberger, T. Udagawa, Z. Zhang, H. Katsura, I. Klich and V. Korepin,Deformed Fredkin spin chain with extensive entanglement, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment6(6), 063103 (2017), doi:10.1088/1742-5468/aa6b1f, 1611. 04983

2017 doi
[17]

Zhang and I

Z. Zhang and I. Klich,Entropy, gap and a multi-parameter deformation of the fredkin spin chain, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical50(42), 425201 (2017), doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aa866e

2017 doi
[18]

Zhang,Entanglement blossom in a simplex matryoshka, Annals of Physics457, 169395 (2023), doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2023.169395

Z. Zhang,Entanglement blossom in a simplex matryoshka, Annals of Physics457, 169395 (2023), doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2023.169395

2023
[19]

Balasubramanian, E

S. Balasubramanian, E. Lake and S. Choi,2d hamiltonians with exotic bipartite and topological entanglement(2023), 2305.07028

2023 arXiv
[20]

Zhang,Bicolor loop models and their long range entanglement, Quantum8, 1268 (2024), doi:10.22331/q-2024-02-29-1268

Z. Zhang,Bicolor loop models and their long range entanglement, Quantum8, 1268 (2024), doi:10.22331/q-2024-02-29-1268

2024 doi
[21]

Zhang and I

Z. Zhang and I. Klich,Coupled Fredkin and Motzkin chains from quan- tum six- and nineteen-vertex models, SciPost Phys.15, 044 (2023), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.2.044

2023 doi
[22]

Zhang and I

Z. Zhang and I. Klich,Quantum lozenge tiling and entanglement phase transition, Quantum8, 1497 (2024), doi:10.22331/q-2024-10-10-1497. 16 SciPost Physics Submission

2024 doi
[23]

Sahoo, Z

S. Sahoo, Z. Zhang and J. C. Y. Teo,Coupled wire model of symmetric ma- jorana surfaces of topological superconductors, Phys. Rev. B94, 165142 (2016), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.94.165142

2016 doi
[24]

Zhang,Sequential generation of two-dimensional super-area-law states with local parent hamiltonian(2025), 2505.02914

W. Zhang,Sequential generation of two-dimensional super-area-law states with local parent hamiltonian(2025), 2505.02914

2025
[26]

A. G. Pronko,Periodic motzkin chain: Ground states and symmetries, Nuclear Physics B1017, 116963 (2025), doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2025.116963

2025
[27]

R. N. Alexander, G. Evenbly and I. Klich,Exact holographic tensor networks for the Motzkin spin chain, Quantum5, 546 (2021), doi:10.22331/q-2021-09-21-546

2021 doi
[28]

O. B. Mykland and Z. Zhang,Reconciling translational invariance and hierarchy (2025), 2507.14656

2025 arXiv
[29]

Okuyama,Holographic tensor network for double-scaled SYK, SciPost Phys.19, 083 (2025), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.19.4.083

K. Okuyama,Holographic tensor network for double-scaled SYK, SciPost Phys.19, 083 (2025), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.19.4.083

2025 doi
[30]

O. B. Mykland and Z. Zhang,Highly entangled 2d ground states: Tensor networks and correlation functions(2025), 2502.20192

2025 arXiv
[31]

R. Movassagh,Entanglement and correlation functions of the quantum motzkin spin-chain, Journal of Mathematical Physics58(3), 031901 (2017), doi:10.1063/1.4977829, https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jmp/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/1. 4977829/15803346/031901_1_online.pdf

2017 doi
[32]

Menon, A

V. Menon, A. Gu and R. Movassagh,Symmetries, correlation functions, and entan- glement of general quantum motzkin spin-chains(2024), 2408.16070

2024 arXiv
[33]

Zhang and H

Z. Zhang and H. Schou Røising,The frustration-free fully packed loop model, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical56(19), 194001 (2023), doi:10.1088/1751- 8121/acc76f

2023 doi
[34]

Levine and R

L. Levine and R. Movassagh,The gap of the area-weighted motzkin spin chain is exponentially small, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical50(25), 255302 (2017), doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aa6cc4

2017 doi
[35]

Andrei, M

R. Andrei, M. Lemm and R. Movassagh,The spin-one motzkin chain is gapped for any area weightt<1(2022), 2204.04517

2022 arXiv
[36]

R. N. Alexander, A. Ahmadain, Z. Zhang and I. Klich,Exact rainbow tensor networks for the colorful motzkin and fredkin spin chains, Phys. Rev. B100, 214430 (2019), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.100.214430. 17

2019 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

D. N. Page,Average entropy of a subsystem, Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 1291 (1993), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1291

doi:10.1103/physrevlett.71.1291 1993

[2] [2]

Eisert, M

J. Eisert, M. Cramer and M. B. Plenio,Colloquium: Area laws for the entanglement entropy, Reviews of Modern Physics82(1), 277–306 (2010), doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.277

doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.277 2010

[3] [3]

M.B.HastingsandT.Koma,Spectral gap and exponential decay of correlations, Com- munications in Mathematical Physics265(3), 781–804 (2006), doi:10.1007/s00220- 006-0030-4

doi:10.1007/s00220- 2006

[4] [4]

Anshu, I

A. Anshu, I. Arad and D. Gosset,An area law for 2d frustration-free spin systems, In Proceedings of the 54th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC ’22. ACM, doi:10.1145/3519935.3519962 (2022)

arXiv 2022

[5] [5]

Holzhey, F

C. Holzhey, F. Larsen and F. Wilczek,Geometric and renormalized en- tropy in conformal field theory, Nuclear Physics B424(3), 443 (1994), doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(94)90402-2

doi:10.1016/0550-3213(94)90402-2 1994

[6] [7]

Gioev and I

D. Gioev and I. Klich,Entanglement entropy of fermions in any di- mension and the widom conjecture, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 100503 (2006), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.100503. 15 SciPost Physics Submission

doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.100503 2006

[7] [8]

Vitagliano, A

G. Vitagliano, A. Riera and J. I. Latorre,Volume-law scaling for the entangle- ment entropy in spin-1/2 chains, New Journal of Physics12(11), 113049 (2010), doi:10.1088/1367-2630/12/11/113049

work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/12/11/113049 2010

[8] [9]

Ramírez, J

G. Ramírez, J. Rodríguez-Laguna and G. Sierra,From conformal to volume law for the entanglement entropy in exponentially deformed critical spin 1/2 chains, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2014(10), P10004 (2014), doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2014/10/P10004

work page doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2014/10/p10004 2014