Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Refusal Tokens: A Simple Way to Calibrate Refusals in Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.06748 v2 pith:3DMTQWZE submitted 2024-12-09 cs.LG cs.CL

classification cs.LGcs.CL
keywords refusalmodelmodelsratescategoryduringqueriesquestions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

A key component of building safe and reliable language models is enabling the models to appropriately refuse to follow certain instructions or answer certain questions. We may want models to output refusal messages for various categories of user queries, for example, ill-posed questions, instructions for committing illegal acts, or queries which require information past the model's knowledge horizon. Engineering models that refuse to answer such questions is complicated by the fact that an individual may want their model to exhibit varying levels of sensitivity for refusing queries of various categories, and different users may want different refusal rates. The current default approach involves training multiple models with varying proportions of refusal messages from each category to achieve the desired refusal rates, which is computationally expensive and may require training a new model to accommodate each user's desired preference over refusal rates. To address these challenges, we propose refusal tokens, one such token for each refusal category or a single refusal token, which are prepended to the model's responses during training. We then show how to increase or decrease the probability of generating the refusal token for each category during inference to steer the model's refusal behavior. Refusal tokens enable controlling a single model's refusal rates without the need of any further fine-tuning, but only by selectively intervening during generation.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Turning the Spell Around: Lightweight Alignment Amplification via Rank-One Safety Injection

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    ROSI bakes the refusal direction into a model's weight matrices via a rank-one update, raising refusal and jailbreak robustness with minimal measured utility cost.

  2. Linearly Decoding Refused Knowledge in Aligned Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Linear probes recover jailbreak-only answers from aligned models' hidden states, sometimes transfer from base models, and correlate with pairwise preference rankings.

Pith tools