Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Unified Detoxifying and Debiasing in Language Generation via Inference-time Adaptive Optimization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.04492 v2 pith:3E63I2QD submitted 2022-10-10 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords debiasingdetoxifyinglanguagebiasesgenerationmodelsuddiaadaptive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Warning: this paper contains model outputs exhibiting offensiveness and biases. Recently pre-trained language models (PLMs) have prospered in various natural language generation (NLG) tasks due to their ability to generate fairly fluent text. Nevertheless, these models are observed to capture and reproduce harmful contents in training corpora, typically toxic language and social biases, raising severe moral issues. Prior works on ethical NLG tackle detoxifying and debiasing separately, which is problematic since we find debiased models still exhibit toxicity while detoxified ones even exacerbate social biases. To address such a challenge, we propose the first unified framework of detoxifying and debiasing called UDDIA, which jointly formalizes these two problems as rectifying the output space. We theoretically interpret our framework as learning a text distribution mixing weighted attributes. Besides, UDDIA conducts adaptive optimization of only a few parameters during decoding based on a parameter-efficient tuning schema without any training data. This leads to minimal generation quality loss and improved rectification performance with acceptable computational cost. Experimental results demonstrate that compared to several strong baselines, UDDIA achieves debiasing and detoxifying simultaneously and better balances efficiency and effectiveness, taking a further step towards practical ethical NLG.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. IRepair: An Intent-Aware Approach to Repair Data-Driven Errors in Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    IRepair selects the transformer block with the largest gradient response to toxic examples and fine-tunes only that block, achieving better toxicity reduction with less perplexity degradation than DPO, DAPT, and DAPT+KL.

  2. Bias Unveiled: Investigating Social Bias in LLM-Generated Code

    cs.SE 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An evaluation framework and 343-task benchmark show that four code LLMs produce socially biased code, and iterative bias feedback reduces measured bias substantially.

Pith tools