Pith. sign in

REVIEW 11 cited by

Step-level Value Preference Optimization for Mathematical Reasoning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.10858 v2 pith:3ISFIZ7Q submitted 2024-06-16 cs.CL cs.AI

Step-level Value Preference Optimization for Mathematical Reasoning

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords preferencemodelreasoningoptimizationvaluemathematicalrewardstep-level
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) using an implicit reward model has proven to be an effective alternative to reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) for fine-tuning preference aligned large language models (LLMs). However, the overall preference annotations of responses do not fully capture the fine-grained quality of model outputs in complex multi-step reasoning tasks, such as mathematical reasoning. To address this limitation, we introduce a novel algorithm called Step-level Value Preference Optimization (SVPO). Our approach employs Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to automatically annotate step-level preferences for multi-step reasoning. Furthermore, from the perspective of learning-to-rank, we train an explicit value model to replicate the behavior of the implicit reward model, complementing standard preference optimization. This value model enables the LLM to generate higher reward responses with minimal cost during inference. Experimental results demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance on both in-domain and out-of-domain mathematical reasoning benchmarks. Our code is available at \url{https://github.com/MARIO-Math-Reasoning/Super_MARIO}.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 11 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Towards Order Fairness: Mitigating LLMs Order Sensitivity through Dual Group Advantage Optimization

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    DGAO uses reinforcement learning to optimize LLMs for both accuracy and order stability by balancing intra-group accuracy advantages and inter-group stability advantages.

  2. R1-VL: Learning to Reason with Multimodal Large Language Models via Step-wise Group Relative Policy Optimization

    cs.AI 2025-03 conditional novelty 7.0

    R1-VL uses StepGRPO with rule-based StepRAR and StepRVR rewards to let MLLMs learn step-by-step reasoning beyond imitation of positive paths.

  3. Do NOT Think That Much for 2+3=? On the Overthinking of o1-Like LLMs

    cs.CL 2024-12 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    o1-like models overthink easy tasks; self-training reduces compute use without accuracy loss on GSM8K, MATH500, GPQA, and AIME.

  4. Multi-Turn On-Policy Distillation with Prefix Replay

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    ReOPD offline-distills multi-turn agentic LLMs via teacher-prefix replay plus step-decay sampling, matching online OPD accuracy at ≥4× speed with zero tool calls.

  5. APCD: Adaptive Path-Contrastive Decoding for Reliable Large Language Model Generation

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    APCD reduces LLM hallucinations by expanding decoding paths adaptively when entropy signals uncertainty and by contrasting divergent paths to control their interaction.

  6. Unlocking Exploration in RLVR: Uncertainty-aware Advantage Shaping for Deeper Reasoning

    cs.AI 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    UCAS refines RLVR advantage signals with a logit-space self-confidence proxy for response-level modulation and asymmetric token-level penalties based on raw logit certainty to boost exploration and reduce entropy collapse.

  7. Agent Q: Advanced Reasoning and Learning for Autonomous AI Agents

    cs.AI 2024-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Agent Q integrates MCTS-guided search, self-critique, and off-policy DPO to train LLM agents that outperform behavior cloning and reinforced fine-tuning baselines in WebShop and achieve up to 95.4% success in real-wor...

  8. Multi-Turn On-Policy Distillation with Prefix Replay

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    By replaying teacher prefixes with a step-decay schedule, multi-turn on-policy distillation can run without live environment interaction, matching or slightly beating online OPD accuracy.

  9. APCD: Adaptive Path-Contrastive Decoding for Reliable Large Language Model Generation

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    APCD adaptively branches LLM decoding paths based on token entropy and contrasts divergent paths to improve factual accuracy while preserving efficiency.

  10. SpikingMamba: Towards Energy-Efficient Large Language Models via Knowledge Distillation from Mamba

    cs.NE 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    SpikingMamba distills Mamba into an SNN LLM achieving 4.76x energy savings with a 4.78% zero-shot accuracy gap that narrows to 2.23% after RL.

  11. Towards Large Reasoning Models: A Survey of Reinforced Reasoning with Large Language Models

    cs.AI 2025-01 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    The paper surveys reinforced reasoning techniques for LLMs, covering automated data construction, learning-to-reason methods, and test-time scaling as steps toward Large Reasoning Models.