Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 7 minor 46 references

Enantioselective radical reactions can be induced by electron spin polarization: A quantum mechanism for Nature's emergent homochirality?

T0 review · 2 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Spin-polarized radical pairs can be enantioselective, with a maximum 50% enantiomeric excess.

desk verdict A clean conditional mechanism for spin-polarization-induced enantioselectivity whose bulk relevance depends on an orientation average the paper never computes. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.08287 v2 pith:3KFOXM4U submitted 2025-07-11 physics.chem-ph physics.bio-phquant-ph

Thomas P Fay This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.chem-phphysics.bio-phquant-ph
keywords enantioselectiveradicalpairreactionschirality-inducedspinselectivityelectronpolarizationspin-orbitcouplingcoherentsinglet–tripletdynamicshomochiralityenantiomericexcessrecombination
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that a reaction between two radicals can be made to favor one mirror-image product over the other simply by polarizing the electron spin of one radical. The effect comes from coherent quantum dynamics between singlet and triplet spin states, which are known to survive in room-temperature solution, working together with a spin-orbit coupling whose sign is set by molecular chirality. The author derives a quantitative yield asymmetry and shows the maximum enantiomeric excess is 50%, with realistic organic radical pairs expected to give smaller values consistent with previously observed enantioselectivities. This gives a microscopic alternative to the proposal that spin-polarized photoelectrons from magnetite caused prebiotic chiral symmetry breaking, and it suggests spin-polarized electrons as a tool for asymmetric synthesis.

What carries the argument

The central object is the prochiral radical pair $[A^{\bullet}B^{\bullet}]$ in two rapidly interconverting chiral forms R and S, each described by a spin density operator evolving under a coupled Stochastic Liouville equation, which is a master equation for the ensemble spin state. The load-bearing pieces are the electron-transfer Hamiltonian with spin-conserving coupling $V_{AB}$ and chirality-dependent spin-orbit coupling $i\Lambda_{AB}$, which defines the reactive states $|\psi_{\pm\theta}\rangle$; the exchange interaction $J$ that drives coherent singlet–triplet dynamics; the R/S interconversion rate $k_f$; and the effective spin-orbit 'superexchange' parameter $\epsilon$ that appears in the spin Hamiltonian and tilts the coherent trajectory toward the reactive state.

What would settle it

One decisive check is an ab initio calculation of the spin-orbit coupling $\Lambda_{AB}$ for the R and S forms of a specific prochiral radical pair: the theory demands $\Lambda_{AB}(R) = -\Lambda_{AB}(S)$, so a calculation showing any other relationship would falsify the mechanism; an experimental cross-check is that the enantiomeric excess must scale as $p_A \cos\chi$, vanishing when the spin-polarization axis is perpendicular to the spin-orbit axis.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that an electron transfer in a prochiral radical pair, with one electron spin polarized, reacts selectively from a chirality-dependent superposition state $|\psi_{\pm\theta}\rangle = \cos\theta|S\rangle \pm i\sin\theta|T_0\rangle$. Exchange coupling $J$ drives coherent oscillations between singlet and triplet that break the R/S reaction-rate symmetry, and in the fast-racemization limit the yield difference is $\Delta\Phi_{\max} = p_A \cos\chi \sin 2\theta / 4$, so the enantiomeric excess can reach 50% for a fully polarized spin aligned with the spin-orbit axis. The paper also shows that a Lamb-shift-like spin-orbit term $\epsilon$ can make the mechanism work even when the direct spin-orbit transfer contribution is small, and that a competing quenching channel can restore the 50% bound independent of the spin-orbit transfer magnitude.

Load-bearing premise

The mechanism requires that reversing the radical pair's chirality reverses the sign of the spin-orbit coupling term in the electron transfer, a premise imported from earlier chirality-induced spin selectivity theory; if that sign flip is not robust in a real condensed-phase pair, the predicted enantioselectivity vanishes, and it also vanishes if spin polarization relaxes faster than the coherent dynamics act.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In the fast-racemization limit the yield difference simplifies to $\Delta\Phi = (p_A \cos\chi/2) \times 2k_r \sin(2\theta)(2J + \epsilon\cos 2\theta)/(k_r^2 + 4(2J + \epsilon\cos 2\theta)^2)$, which caps the enantiomeric excess at 50%.
  • For typical organic radical pairs ($\Lambda_{AB} \approx 1\ \mathrm{cm}^{-1}$, $V_{AB} \approx 10$–$100\ \mathrm{cm}^{-1}$), the predicted excess is small, but the $\epsilon$ term and a competing quenching pathway can push it toward the 50% cap.
  • Magnetic perturbations that disrupt singlet–triplet coherence — static fields, radio-frequency fields, or magnetic isotope substitution — are predicted to alter the enantiomeric excess, giving a way to distinguish this mechanism from alternatives.
  • The mechanism applies to spin-polarized radical recombination at magnetized surfaces, identifying reactions such as redox-catalyzed cycloadditions and proton-coupled electron transfers as candidate systems for spin-controlled asymmetric synthesis.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A consequence the paper leaves implicit: reversing the magnetization direction (reversing $p_A$) should reverse the handedness of the product excess in any experiment built on this mechanism, which would be a clean control test.
  • The same coherent spin-dynamics logic could be transplanted to electrochemical asymmetric synthesis, where an external magnetic field sets the polarization axis instead of a ferromagnetic surface.
  • The 50% bound applies to a single radical-pair encounter; in a catalytic cycle with many turnovers and subsequent amplification steps, the final observable enantiomeric excess could be much larger than the per-encounter bound.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a quantum mechanism by which electron spin polarization can induce enantioselectivity in radical-pair recombination reactions. The key intermediate is a prochiral radical pair [A•B•] whose R and S forms interconvert, and whose spin-selective electron transfer is governed by chirality-dependent spin-orbit coupling. Starting from a two-state S/T0 model, the author shows that an exchange interaction creates a coherent phase difference between singlet and triplet components, so that the projection of the time-evolved state onto the chirality-dependent reactive states |ψ+θ⟩ and |ψ−θ⟩ becomes unequal; this yields an instantaneous rate asymmetry. The paper then generalizes the argument to a Stochastic Liouville Equation (SLE) description with racemization, spin-selective reaction, and quenching, and derives analytic expressions for the final yield difference ΔΦ and enantiomeric excess. The maximum ee is 50% for fully polarized spins aligned with the spin-orbit axis, with smaller values expected for typical organic radical pairs. The author connects the mechanism to prebiotic reduction of glyceronitrile at magnetite surfaces and to recent experiments on spin-controlled enantioselective catalysis, and proposes experimental tests based on magnetic-field and isotope effects.

Significance. If the mechanism is correct, it provides a concrete alternative to the photoelectron-based CISS proposal for prebiotic chiral symmetry breaking, and it suggests a new strategy for asymmetric synthesis with spin-polarized electrons. The elementary two-state derivation is transparent and formally correct, and the SLE treatment is a conventional open-quantum-system framework with analytic results that give useful bounds. The paper is also commendable for proposing falsifiable tests, such as radio-frequency field effects and magnetic isotope substitution, and for noting that all parameters are, in principle, computable. However, the bulk enantioselectivity claim is not yet established: the orientational dependence appears only through pA cosχ, and no ensemble average over molecular orientation is computed. Since an isotropic sample gives ⟨cosχ⟩=0, the central claim currently applies to an ideally oriented single pair rather than to the bulk reactions invoked for homochirality or asymmetric synthesis.

major comments (2)
  1. [Eqs. (11)-(13) and SI S1] The quantitative claim for bulk enantioselectivity is not established because the model's orientational dependence is reduced to the single factor pA cosχ, and no ensemble average over χ is computed. For a freely tumbling radical-pair ensemble, χ is uniformly distributed and ⟨cosχ⟩=0, so the predicted yield difference vanishes even if every CISS assumption is granted. The magnetite-surface scenario in Fig. 4 could provide partial orientational order, but the paper gives no orientational distribution, no estimate of ⟨cosχ⟩, and no argument that adsorption at an achiral surface correlates the molecular spin-orbit axis with the surface magnetization. Without such an average, Eq. (13) is an upper bound for an ideally oriented single pair, not a prediction for the bulk reactions invoked for homochirality or asymmetric synthesis.
  2. [Eqs. (1)-(3) and the following text] The sole chiral input is the assumption that changing chirality changes the sign of ΛAB, so that the R and S radical pairs react selectively from |ψ+θ⟩ and |ψ−θ⟩ respectively. This sign flip is imported from earlier CISS electron-transfer theory (Refs. 22 and 32) and is not independently validated for the condensed-phase radical pairs considered here. If the sign of ΛAB is not robustly tied to molecular chirality for the specific SOMO pair, the enantioselectivity vanishes identically even for fully polarized radicals. The paper should state this sensitivity explicitly and propose a concrete test, for example an ab initio calculation of the effective ΛAB for the R and S forms of a realistic radical pair, or discuss conditions under which the sign convention could fail.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Paragraph discussing Fig. 2] The statement 'θ=0.05, which corresponds to ΛAB/VAB ≈ 10' is inconsistent with Eq. (2), which gives θ=atan(ΛAB/(2VAB)); for θ=0.05 one finds ΛAB/VAB ≈ 0.1. The following numerical example (ΛAB≈1 cm−1, VAB≈10 cm−1) actually corresponds to θ≈0.05, so the ratio should be corrected.
  2. [Fig. 3 caption and main text] The caption contains 'ϵ]simeq − 2J', which should read 'ϵ ≃ −2J'; in addition, the sentence describing the Bloch sphere says the initial state 'lies along the x direct', which is missing a noun.
  3. [Abstract and main text] The word 'enantioseletive' is misspelled; it should be 'enantioselective'.
  4. [Fig. 2 caption] The caption reports 'kf is set to 100J, J, 0.01J' without stating the units of kf relative to J; please specify clearly whether these values mean kf/J = 100, 1, 0.01.
  5. [Last full paragraph of the main text] The spin-relaxation caveat is acknowledged, but no estimate is given for the proposed magnetite/glyceronitrile scenario; because the maximum ee requires kr to be comparable to J, a brief estimate of spin relaxation times relative to kr−1 would strengthen the practical relevance of the proposal.
  6. [Discussion of Metzger et al. experiments] The comparison with the observed 8.5-16% ee is only a consistency check against the 50% upper bound; no parameter set for those experiments is proposed, so the agreement should not be presented as a quantitative validation.
  7. [SI S2 and S3] There are typos in the supporting information, including 'electorn transfer' in S2 and 'surafce' in S3; in addition, the complex function f in Eq. (S6) is given without derivation, so a short derivation or a reference to a symbolic-computation notebook would aid verification.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the SLE derivation is self-contained given the stated CISS input, and the self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The derivation chain is transparent: the paper assumes a CISS-style electron-transfer Hamiltonian with a chirality-dependent sign of Lambda_AB (Eqs. 1-3), defines chirality-selective reaction operators (Eq. S3), and solves the coupled stochastic Liouville equations (Eq. S1) to obtain the yield asymmetry DeltaPhi (Eq. 11). The result is a mathematical consequence of these microscopic assumptions, not a restatement of them. In particular, the equal initial overlaps |<psi_plus/minus_theta|Psi_0>|^2 = 1/2 (Eq. 7) evolve into unequal instantaneous reaction probabilities through the exchange-induced phase (Eqs. 8-10), which is the nontrivial dynamical content. No parameter is fitted to the target enantiomeric excess; the maximum ee bound of 50% follows from the population bookkeeping Phi_R = 1/4 + DeltaPhi/2 and Phi_S = 1/4 - DeltaPhi/2, not from an imposed ee. The main chiral premise, that changing chirality changes the sign of Lambda_AB, is supported by external CISS literature (Ref. 32; experiments Refs. 19-21) as well as the author's prior work (Refs. 22-24), so the self-citations are not the sole load-bearing justification. The concern that an isotropic ensemble average <cos(chi)> = 0 would erase the effect is an applicability/orientational averaging issue, not a circularity, since the paper explicitly targets magnetized-surface settings where the polarization axis can be aligned with the molecular spin-orbit axis. The score of 1 reflects only the paper's reliance on the author's prior CISS formalism as a legitimate conditional input.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model is built on standard spin-chemistry machinery plus a chirality-dependent spin-selective electron-transfer hypothesis taken from the author's previous CISS work. The free parameters are physical inputs with illustrative values, not fitted to data. The central prediction of a 50% maximum ee arises from tuning these parameters to their ideal values; no parameter is calibrated against the Metzger experiments, so the comparison is only a bound.

free parameters (7)
  • theta (spin-orbit contribution angle)
    Defined as atan(LambdaAB/2VAB); sets the spin mixture of the reactive states. The paper uses theta=0.05 for typical organic pairs, a chosen illustration not fitted to data. If theta=0, enantioselectivity vanishes (Eq. 11).
  • J (exchange coupling)
    Singlet-triplet energy splitting that drives coherent spin evolution; the size of J controls the timescale over which the R/S rate imbalance appears. Values relative to kr and kf are chosen for figures.
  • epsilon (spin-orbit superexchange coupling)
    Lamb-shift type term in the spin Hamiltonian H+- = 2hJ|S><S| + h epsilon |psi+theta><psi+theta|; can enhance ee when it has opposite sign to J, e.g., epsilon=-2J. This is a model parameter, not measured here.
  • kf (racemization rate)
    Interconversion rate between R and S radical pair precursors; the paper derives fast (Eq. 12) and slow (Eq. 14) limits, showing ee is present across regimes.
  • kr (spin-selective reaction rate)
    Rate of electron transfer to the singlet product from the reactive spin state; in Fig. 2 set to kr=4J. The maximum ee in the fast limit occurs when kr=2(2J+epsilon cos(2theta)).
  • kQ (quenching rate)
    Spin-independent decay of the radical pair, introduced in the SI; with kf=0 it can combine with epsilon to boost ee above the sin(2theta)/2 limit. Treated as a free rate, not measured.
  • pA cos(chi) (effective spin polarization)
    The projection of the initial radical spin polarization onto the spin-orbit axis; ee is linearly proportional to it (Eqs. 11-15). The maximum of 50% requires |pA cos(chi)| = 1.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The radical pair [A.B.] exists in two rapidly interconverting chiral forms, [A.B.]R and [A.B.]S, with equal free energy and equal initial population.
    This is the chiral symmetry-breaking setup of the paper (reaction scheme after Eq. 1). It assumes racemization is fast enough to replenish the favored enantiomer.
  • domain assumption Electron transfer from the radical pair to the singlet product is selective for the spin states |psi+theta> for R and |psi-theta> for S, with the sign of LambdaAB determined by chirality.
    Imported from Ref 22 and used in Eqs. (1)-(3); this is the load-bearing chiral input.
  • domain assumption Spin relaxation and singlet-triplet dephasing are slow compared to the radical pair spin dynamics and lifetime.
    Explicitly assumed in the model (SLE has no relaxation terms); the paper acknowledges this in the discussion of spin-relaxation and limits its conclusions to strongly coupled, fast recombining pairs.
  • domain assumption The exchange coupling J dominates dipolar coupling, so dipolar terms can be neglected.
    Stated in the main text: 'Dipolar coupling between electron spins is ignored in this model for simplicity, and since for a close radical pair exchange coupling J is expected to be much stronger than dipolar coupling.'
  • domain assumption Spin-polarized radicals can be generated at magnetized ferromagnetic surfaces, e.g., via electron transfer from magnetite.
    Required for the proposed applications; the paper cites prior experiments but provides no new evidence that surface-generated radicals retain polarization in the reactive radical pair.
  • standard math The stochastic Liouville equation with Markovian reaction operators is an adequate description of the open quantum system dynamics.
    The SLE is a standard tool in spin chemistry; the reaction operators K+- with anticommutators are conventional, but their derivation from a microscopic Hamiltonian is only sketched ('it can be rigorously derived...').

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Enantioselective radical reactions can be induced by electron spin polarization: A quantum mechanism for Nature's emergent homochirality?." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3KFOXM4U

@misc{pith2026250708287,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Enantioselective radical reactions can be induced by electron spin polarization: A quantum mechanism for Nature's emergent homochirality?},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3KFOXM4U}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.08287}
}
read the original abstract

Biomolecules that constitute life on Earth are chiral, but the precise mechanism by which homochirality emerged remains a mystery. In this work it is demonstrated that reactions of radical pairs, where one of the radical electron spins is polarised, can be enantioselective. This phenomenon arises from transient coherent quantum dynamics of the radical pair electron spins, which is known to occur even in warm and noisy condensed phase environments, where energetic perturbations much smaller than thermal energy can have large effects on reactivity. A quantitative theory is presented based on the molecular theory of chirality induced spin selectivity (CISS), where electron exchange interactions and chirality-dependent spin-orbit coupling effects control enantioselectivity. This theory provides useful bounds on the maximum enantiomeric excess for these reactions, which are found to be consistent with previous experiments. The enantioseletive radical pair mechanism presented here provides an alternative mechanistic basis to a recent proposal that spin-polarised photoelectrons from magnetite provided the initial chiral symmetry breaking necessary for the inception of homochirality in Nature, as well as suggests a new strategy for asymmetric synthesis using spin-polarised electrons.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.08287 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) An illustration of the frontier orbitals of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Simulations of the time-dependent rate and yield dif [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Bloch sphere trajectories for the radical pair for differ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. An illustration of how a radical pair intermediate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    author author D. G. \ Blackmond ,\ title title The Origin of Biological Homochirality ,\ https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a032540 journal journal Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology \ volume 11 ,\ pages a032540 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a032540

  2. [2]

    Sallembien , author L

    author author Q. Sallembien , author L. Bouteiller , author J. Crassous ,\ and\ author M. Raynal ,\ title title Possible chemical and physical scenarios towards biological homochirality ,\ https://doi.org/10.1039/D1CS01179K journal journal Chemical Society Reviews \ volume 51 ,\ pages 3436 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1039/d1cs01179k

  3. [3]

    Rau ,\ title title Asymmetric photochemistry in solution ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/cr00057a003 journal journal Chemical Reviews \ volume 83 ,\ pages 535 ( year 1983 ) NoStop

    author author H. Rau ,\ title title Asymmetric photochemistry in solution ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/cr00057a003 journal journal Chemical Reviews \ volume 83 ,\ pages 535 ( year 1983 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/cr00057a003 1983

  4. [4]

    author author G. L. J. A. \ Rikken \ and\ author E. Raupach ,\ title title Enantioselective magnetochiral photochemistry ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/35016043 journal journal Nature \ volume 405 ,\ pages 932 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/35016043

  5. [5]

    author author S. F. \ Ozturk \ and\ author D. D. \ Sasselov ,\ title title On the origins of life’s homochirality: Inducing enantiomeric excess with spin-polarized electrons ,\ https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2204765119 journal journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences \ volume 119 ,\ pages e2204765119 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1073/pnas.2204765119

  6. [6]

    author author S. F. \ Ozturk , author Z. Liu , author J. D. \ Sutherland ,\ and\ author D. D. \ Sasselov ,\ title title Origin of biological homochirality by crystallization of an RNA precursor on a magnetic surface ,\ https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adg8274 journal journal Science Advances \ volume 9 ,\ pages eadg8274 ( year 2023 a ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.adg8274

  7. [7]

    author author S. F. \ Ozturk , author D. D. \ Sasselov ,\ and\ author J. D. \ Sutherland ,\ title title The central dogma of biological homochirality: How does chiral information propagate in a prebiotic network? ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0156527 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 159 ,\ pages 061102 ( year 2023 b ) NoStop

    doi:10.1063/5.0156527

  8. [8]

    author author T. S. \ Metzger , author S. Mishra , author B. P. \ Bloom , author N. Goren , author A. Neubauer , author G. Shmul , author J. Wei , author S. Yochelis , author F. Tassinari , author C. Fontanesi , author D. H. \ Waldeck , author Y. Paltiel ,\ and\ author R. Naaman ,\ title title The Electron Spin as a Chiral Reagent ,\ https://doi.org/10.10...

    work page doi:10.1002/anie.201911400

Show all 46 references
  1. [9]

    author author T. S. \ Metzger , author R. Siam , author Y. Kolodny , author N. Goren , author N. Sukenik , author S. Yochelis , author R. Abu-Reziq , author D. Avnir ,\ and\ author Y. Paltiel ,\ title title Dynamic Spin - Controlled Enantioselective Catalytic Chiral Reactions ...

    doi

  2. [10]

    author author D. K. \ Bhowmick , author T. K. \ Das , author K. Santra , author A. K. \ Mondal , author F. Tassinari , author R. Schwarz , author C. E. \ Diesendruck ,\ and\ author R. Naaman ,\ title title Spin-induced asymmetry reaction— The formation of asymmetric carbon by ...

    doi

  3. [11]

    author author B. P. \ Bloom , author Y. Paltiel , author R. Naaman ,\ and\ author D. H. \ Waldeck ,\ title title Chiral Induced Spin Selectivity ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00661 journal journal Chemical Reviews \ volume 124 ,\ pages 1950 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    doi

  4. [12]

    Wu \ and\ author J

    author author Y. Wu \ and\ author J. E. \ Subotnik ,\ title title Electronic spin separation induced by nuclear motion near conical intersections ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20831-8 journal journal Nature Communications \ volume 12 ,\ pages 700 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    doi

  5. [13]

    Bian \ and\ author J

    author author X. Bian \ and\ author J. E. \ Subotnik ,\ title title Spin- Dependent Stereochemistry : A Nonadiabatic Quantum Dynamics Case Study of S + H _ 2 → SH + H Reaction ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c03344 journal journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry Lett...

    doi

  6. [14]

    author author S. F. \ Ozturk , author D. K. \ Bhowmick , author Y. Kapon , author Y. Sang , author A. Kumar , author Y. Paltiel , author R. Naaman ,\ and\ author D. D. \ Sasselov ,\ title title Chirality-induced avalanche magnetization of magnetite by an RNA precursor ,\ journ...

    doi

  7. [15]

    author author U. E. \ Steiner \ and\ author T. Ulrich ,\ title title Magnetic field effects in chemical kinetics and related phenomena ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/cr00091a003 journal journal Chemical Reviews \ volume 89 ,\ pages 51 ( year 1989 ) NoStop

    doi

  8. [16]

    author author T. Mani ,\ title title Molecular qubits based on photogenerated spin-correlated radical pairs for quantum sensing ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0084072 journal journal Chemical Physics Reviews \ volume 3 ,\ pages 021301 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    doi

  9. [17]

    Maeda , author K

    author author K. Maeda , author K. B. \ Henbest , author F. Cintolesi , author I. Kuprov , author C. T. \ Rodgers , author P. A. \ Liddell , author D. Gust , author C. R. \ Timmel ,\ and\ author P. J. \ Hore ,\ title title Chemical compass model of avian magnetoreception ,\ ht...

    doi

  10. [18]

    author author P. J. \ Hore \ and\ author H. Mouritsen ,\ title title The Radical - Pair Mechanism of Magnetoreception ,\ https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biophys-032116-094545 journal journal Annual Review of Biophysics \ volume 45 ,\ pages 299 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    doi

  11. [19]

    Carmeli , author K

    author author I. Carmeli , author K. S. \ Kumar , author O. Heifler , author C. Carmeli ,\ and\ author R. Naaman ,\ title title Spin Selectivity in Electron Transfer in Photosystem I ,\ https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201404382 journal journal Angewandte Chemie International Edit...

    doi

  12. [20]

    author author H. J. \ Eckvahl , author N. A. \ Tcyrulnikov , author A. Chiesa , author J. M. \ Bradley , author R. M. \ Young , author S. Carretta , author M. D. \ Krzyaniak ,\ and\ author M. R. \ Wasielewski ,\ title title Direct observation of chirality-induced spin selectiv...

    doi

  13. [21]

    author author H. J. \ Eckvahl , author G. Copley , author R. M. \ Young , author M. D. \ Krzyaniak ,\ and\ author M. R. \ Wasielewski ,\ title title Detecting Chirality - Induced Spin Selectivity in Randomly Oriented Radical Pairs Photogenerated by Hole Transfer ,\ https://doi...

    doi

  14. [22]

    author author T. P. \ Fay ,\ title title Chirality- Induced Spin Coherence in Electron Transfer Reactions ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c00009 journal journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters \ volume 12 ,\ pages 1407 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    doi

  15. [23]

    author author T. P. \ Fay \ and\ author D. T. \ Limmer ,\ title title Origin of Chirality Induced Spin Selectivity in Photoinduced Electron Transfer ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c02370 journal journal Nano Letters \ volume 21 ,\ pages 6696 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    doi

  16. [24]

    author author T. P. \ Fay \ and\ author D. T. \ Limmer ,\ title title Spin selective charge recombination in chiral donor–bridge–acceptor triads ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0150269 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 158 ,\ pages 194101 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    doi

  17. [25]

    author author S. S. \ Chandran , author Y. Wu , author H.-H. \ Teh , author D. H. \ Waldeck ,\ and\ author J. E. \ Subotnik ,\ title title Electron transfer and spin–orbit coupling: Can nuclear motion lead to spin selective rates? ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0086554 journal j...

    doi

  18. [26]

    author author S. S. \ Chandran , author Y. Wu ,\ and\ author J. E. \ Subotnik ,\ title title Effect of Duschinskii Rotations on Spin - Dependent Electron Transfer Dynamics ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.2c06149 journal journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry A \ volume ...

    doi

  19. [27]

    Chiesa , author E

    author author A. Chiesa , author E. Garlatti , author M. Mezzadri , author L. Celada , author R. Sessoli , author M. R. \ Wasielewski , author R. Bittl , author P. Santini ,\ and\ author S. Carretta ,\ title title Many- Body Models for Chirality - Induced Spin Selectivity in E...

    doi

  20. [28]

    author author J. Fransson ,\ title title Chiral Induced Spin Polarized Electron Current : Origin of the Chiral Induced Spin Selectivity Effect ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5c00104 journal journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters \ volume 16 ,\ pages 4346 ( y...

    doi

  21. [29]

    Chiesa , author A

    author author A. Chiesa , author A. Privitera , author E. Garlatti , author G. Allodi , author R. Bittl , author M. R. \ Wasielewski , author R. Sessoli ,\ and\ author S. Carretta ,\ title title Chirality- Induced Spin Selectivity at the Molecular Level : A Different Perspecti...

    doi

  22. [30]

    Mims , author J

    author author D. Mims , author J. Herpich , author N. N. \ Lukzen , author U. E. \ Steiner ,\ and\ author C. Lambert ,\ title title Readout of spin quantum beats in a charge-separated radical pair by pump-push spectroscopy ,\ https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abl4254 journal jou...

    doi

  23. [31]

    author author J. P. \ Malrieu , author R. Caballol , author C. J. \ Calzado , author C. De Graaf ,\ and\ author N. Guihéry ,\ title title Magnetic Interactions in Molecules and Highly Correlated Materials : Physical Content , Analytical Derivation , and Rigorous Extraction of ...

    doi

  24. [32]

    Dalum \ and\ author P

    author author S. Dalum \ and\ author P. Hedegard ,\ title title Theory of Chiral Induced Spin Selectivity ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b01707 journal journal Nano Letters \ volume 19 ,\ pages 5253 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019 doi

  25. [33]

    author author D. J. \ Ritson \ and\ author J. D. \ Sutherland ,\ title title Synthesis of Aldehydic Ribonucleotide and Amino Acid Precursors by Photoredox Chemistry ,\ https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201300321 journal journal Angewandte Chemie International Edition \ volume 52 ,\...

    doi

  26. [34]

    author author P. D. \ Morse , author T. M. \ Nguyen , author C. L. \ Cruz ,\ and\ author D. A. \ Nicewicz ,\ title title Enantioselective counter-anions in photoredox catalysis: The asymmetric cation radical Diels - Alder reaction ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tet.2018.03.052 j...

    doi

  27. [35]

    Ma \ and\ author A

    author author Y. Ma \ and\ author A. A. \ Hussein ,\ title title Formal Pericyclic ‐ Coupled Electron Transfer : I . Stepwise Formal Diels ‐ Alder Cycloaddition Enabled by Addition ‐ Coupled Electron Transfer ,\ https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.202202354 journal journal ChemistryS...

    doi

  28. [36]

    author author A. M. \ Brugh \ and\ author M. D. E. \ Forbes ,\ title title Anomalous chemically induced electron spin polarization in proton-coupled electron transfer reactions: insight into radical pair dynamics ,\ https://doi.org/10.1039/D0SC02691C journal journal Chemical S...

    doi

  29. [37]

    Zhang , author S

    author author N. Zhang , author S. R. \ Samanta , author B. M. \ Rosen ,\ and\ author V. Percec ,\ title title Single Electron Transfer in Radical Ion and Radical - Mediated Organic , Materials and Polymer Synthesis ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/cr400689s journal journal Chemical...

    doi

  30. [38]

    author author D. R. \ Kattnig \ and\ author P. J. \ Hore ,\ title title The sensitivity of a radical pair compass magnetoreceptor can be significantly amplified by radical scavengers ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09914-7 journal journal Scientific Reports \ volume 7 ,\...

    doi

  31. [39]

    author author K. B. \ Henbest , author P. Kukura , author C. T. \ Rodgers , author P. J. \ Hore ,\ and\ author C. R. \ Timmel ,\ title title Radio Frequency Magnetic Field Effects on a Radical Recombination Reaction : A Diagnostic Test for the Radical Pair Mechanism ,\ https:/...

    doi

  32. [40]

    author author A. L. \ Buchachenko ,\ title title Magnetic Isotope Effect : Nuclear Spin Control of Chemical Reactions ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/jp011261d journal journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry A \ volume 105 ,\ pages 9995 ( year 2001 ) NoStop

    doi

  33. [41]

    author author J. E. \ Lawrence \ and\ author D. E. \ Manolopoulos ,\ title title Path integral methods for reaction rates in complex systems ,\ https://doi.org/10.1039/C9FD00084D journal journal Faraday Discussions \ volume 221 ,\ pages 9 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    doi

  34. [42]

    author author J. Blumberger ,\ title title Recent Advances in the Theory and Molecular Simulation of Biological Electron Transfer Reactions ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00298 journal journal Chemical Reviews \ volume 115 ,\ pages 11191 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    doi

  35. [43]

    author author T. P. \ Fay , author L. P. \ Lindoy ,\ and\ author D. E. \ Manolopoulos ,\ title title Spin-selective electron transfer reactions of radical pairs: Beyond the Haberkorn master equation ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5041520 journal journal The Journal of Chemical P...

    doi

  36. [44]

    author author T. P. \ Fay , author L. P. \ Lindoy ,\ and\ author D. E. \ Manolopoulos ,\ title title Electron spin relaxation in radical pairs: Beyond the Redfield approximation ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5125752 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 151 ,...

    doi

  37. [45]

    author author J. Luo ,\ title title Sensitivity enhancement of radical-pair magnetoreceptors as a result of spin decoherence ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0182172 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 160 ,\ pages 074306 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    doi

  38. [46]

    author author W. R. \ Inc. ,\ https://www.wolfram.com/mathematica title Mathematica, V ersion 14.1 ,\ note champaign, IL, 2024 NoStop

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.